Languish.org

General Category => Off the Record => Topic started by: Vince on March 10, 2009, 12:51:57 PM

Title: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Vince on March 10, 2009, 12:51:57 PM
Might as well get one started...

Six more weeks until the draft.    :-[

Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Grey Fox on March 10, 2009, 01:22:05 PM
4 month till LFFL 2010.

:(
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Strix on March 10, 2009, 01:28:31 PM
Steelers are starting to shed dead weight, McFadden and Anthony Smith.

That is all!
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: JacobL on March 10, 2009, 03:52:53 PM
QuoteRAY LEWIS' NEW CONTRACT IS A SEVEN-YEAR DEAL
Posted by Aaron Wilson on March 10, 2009, 4:43 p.m.

Baltimore Ravens All-Pro middle linebacker Ray Lewis' contract, which he officially signed Monday, is a seven-year, incentive-laden pact, according to NFL Players Association records.

It's not a three-year, $22 million contract as originally reported.

Per Jason Cole of Yahoo! Sports, Lewis received $15.5 million in guaranteed money in an intricate structure that pays the two-time NFL Defensive Player of the Year a total of $10 million during the 2009 season. According to the article, Lewis gets a $6.25 million signing bonus, a $2.75 million roster bonus and a $1 million base salary.

The Ravens have option-year decisions to make in 2010 and 2011. A 10-time Pro Bowl selection, Lewis has a $1.25 million option bonus in 2010 with a $4.25 million base salary.

His 2011 option bonus goes up to $2 million with a base salary raise of an additional $250,000 from his 2010 compensation level.

An NFLPA source told Cole: "The reason for doing it this way is to deal with the salary cap, assuming that there's a cap again. It's just a way of handling the proration on the signing bonus and the other money."

Per NFLPA records we've seen, Lewis is due the following base salaries: $1 million in 2009, $4.25 million 2010, $4.5 million in 2011, $4.95 million in 2012, $5.4 million in 2013, $5.85 million in 2014 and $6.3 million in 2015.

Of course, it's extremely unlikely that Lewis will be playing middle linebacker when he's 40 years old. Lewis turns 34 in May.


Interesting way to do a deal. :D
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Benedict Arnold on March 10, 2009, 03:54:54 PM
Vince's thread wasn't good enough for you? ;)
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Berkut on March 10, 2009, 03:55:29 PM
In other news, the Bills signed Terrell Owens.

Ballsy move, I guess. At least it might trick some locals into giving a shit, one way or the other.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: JacobL on March 10, 2009, 03:56:14 PM
Quote from: Benedict Arnold on March 10, 2009, 03:54:54 PM
Vince's thread wasn't good enough for you? ;)
Apparently not good enough to stay on the first page. ;)

Orlando Pace is getting cut also.


edit:  I actually did a quick look but didn't see it somehow.  Besides that is an off season thread and mine covers the regular reason also.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: katmai on March 10, 2009, 04:40:38 PM
Quote from: Strix on March 10, 2009, 01:28:31 PM
Steelers are starting to shed dead weight, McFadden and Anthony Smith.

That is all!

Hey strix me hard drive died over weekend, so that's why i didn't get LFBB setup.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Benedict Arnold on March 11, 2009, 03:25:03 PM
Quote from: katmai on March 10, 2009, 04:40:38 PM
Hey strix me hard drive died over weekend, so that's why i didn't get LFBB setup.

It is the works though?  As per usual, count me in.  Hell, I think I was a player in the KAPland league before you.  I have: seniority!
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Stonewall on March 11, 2009, 03:48:33 PM
Quote from: Strix on March 10, 2009, 01:28:31 PM
Steelers are starting to shed dead weight, McFadden and Anthony Smith.

That is all!

McFadden was a good player, but not worth the money Arizona gave him.  Smith was just a roster spot taken by someone who choked when it was his turn to play.  We need a 3rd wide receiver.  As much as I think Sweed has potential, he's clearly not ready to feature regularly in the offense and Hines Ward has seen better days.  Receiver is a huge need, as is the O-Line and D-Line.  Thankfully the D-Line problems are more to do with age than performance. 
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Strix on March 12, 2009, 08:55:33 AM
Quote from: Stonewall on March 11, 2009, 03:48:33 PM
McFadden was a good player, but not worth the money Arizona gave him.  Smith was just a roster spot taken by someone who choked when it was his turn to play.  We need a 3rd wide receiver.  As much as I think Sweed has potential, he's clearly not ready to feature regularly in the offense and Hines Ward has seen better days.  Receiver is a huge need, as is the O-Line and D-Line.  Thankfully the D-Line problems are more to do with age than performance.

Everything I am hearing from the "experts" it seems to indicate that this year's draft is deep in talent when it comes to the receiver position. Hopefully we can grab a good one in the 3rd or 4th round.

I am hopeful that the O-Line continues to gel and improves. Talent is great but often working together for an extended time can make up for some talent issues.

It's a pipe dream but sure would be nice to grab Marvin Harrison for that 3rd receiver spot.  ;)
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Stonewall on March 12, 2009, 11:52:09 AM
Yeah, I agree on receiver being a deep position this year.  Sweed has tons of potential.  His Texas highlights are impressive.  I know he can catch the ball.  Hopefully it was rookie jitters.  I remember how awful Plaxico was in his first season and he turned out to be an excellent receiver. 
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: JacobL on March 12, 2009, 03:13:02 PM
It seems sadly people prefer this thread to mine for some foolish reason.

per PFT

Quote

Kurt Warner might get to keep his $2 million, after all.

A league source tells us that the Arizona Cardinals are shopping receiver Anquan Boldin to potential trade partners.

Warner recently has suggested that he'd devote a portion of his salary to signing Boldin to a new contract.  (We don't think Warner really means it.)

Boldin, a six-year veteran, is signed through 2010.  He has wanted for roughly a year a significant increase from his current range of $2.5 million to $3 million.

With teammate Larry Fitzgerald at $10 million per year, Boldin is believed to want at least $9 million annually.

Boldin previously has requested a trade.  At one point after the Super Bowl, Boldin said that he would not sign a new deal with the Cardinals, and that he wanted to be dealt to a new team.  More recently, he had softened in his position, expressing a willingness to consider a new long-term contract to stay with the team.


Arizona needs to just completely come out and admit they are trading him.  Wouldn't exactly shock people if he suddenly goes to the Eagles for one of their 2 1st rounders and maybe some small change with it.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadImmortalMan on March 12, 2009, 04:52:39 PM
Has anybody seen any decent draft predictions?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Vince on March 12, 2009, 04:57:33 PM
Quote from: JacobL on March 12, 2009, 03:13:02 PM
It seems sadly people prefer this thread to mine for some foolish reason.

:yeah:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: JacobL on March 12, 2009, 05:00:07 PM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on March 12, 2009, 04:52:39 PM
Has anybody seen any decent draft predictions?
Most mock drafts are still fairly horrible.  I would wait till at least 3 weeks before to expect any to be even close to accurate.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Vince on March 12, 2009, 07:57:29 PM
Looks like Jay Cutler will be gone from Denver soon...

QuoteAfter apparently blowing off the team's owner Pat Bowlen twice, Cutler then took a confernce call with the front office this week and heard what he wanted to hear according to the Denver Post:

According to an NFL source, Broncos quarterback Jay Cutler came away from a conference call with team officials Monday believing that for the right deal, he would be traded between now and the NFL draft, which begins April 25.

Broncos coach Josh McDaniels would not comment, but a source close to the team said Broncos officials had a different interpretation of how the conference call went.

McDaniels was joined on one end of the conference call by Broncos owner Pat Bowlen, general manager Brian Xanders and chief operating officer Joe Ellis. Cutler was in Nashville, Tenn., during the call and was accompanied by his agent, Bus Cook.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on March 12, 2009, 08:07:55 PM
I knew that when they disrespected Plummer that it would bite them in the ass.  Cutler brought nothing that Plummer didn't already bring, except for an enormous, insatiable ego.  Denver will reap what they've sown.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: katmai on March 12, 2009, 09:04:51 PM
Quote from: Benedict Arnold on March 11, 2009, 03:25:03 PM
Quote from: katmai on March 10, 2009, 04:40:38 PM
Hey strix me hard drive died over weekend, so that's why i didn't get LFBB setup.

It is the works though?  As per usual, count me in.  Hell, I think I was a player in the KAPland league before you.  I have: seniority!

::) considering i have been the one creating and maintaning the leagues since kapland doubtful :p

And i'll have the league setup by tomorrow, busy running around with my dad this evening as he's in town for a short layover before heading to San Antoino on R&R
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on March 12, 2009, 09:06:13 PM
This thread is for football.  If you Mexicans want to start a thread about faggoty baseball, then start one, rather than polluting this one.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Benedict Arnold on March 13, 2009, 04:13:03 AM
Quote from: Vince on March 12, 2009, 04:57:33 PM
:yeah:
Gotta support my CNY bro!  Hehe.  We should organize a Utica-Rome Languish Meet. 8)
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Vince on March 13, 2009, 07:17:59 AM
Quote from: Benedict Arnold on March 13, 2009, 04:13:03 AM
Quote from: Vince on March 12, 2009, 04:57:33 PM
:yeah:
Gotta support my CNY bro!  Hehe.  We should organize a Utica-Rome Languish Meet. 8)

As long as there isn't 2 feet of snow on the ground sure.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on March 13, 2009, 07:26:29 AM
Quote from: JacobL on March 12, 2009, 03:13:02 PM
It seems sadly people prefer this thread to mine for some foolish reason.
Now the threads are merged, so you can be happy again.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Benedict Arnold on March 13, 2009, 03:39:25 PM
Quote from: Vince on March 13, 2009, 07:17:59 AM
As long as there isn't 2 feet of snow on the ground sure.
So... July?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Syt on March 14, 2009, 01:18:55 PM
Are the Ravens gay?
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffailblog.files.wordpress.com%2F2009%2F03%2Ffail-owned-tackle-fail.jpg&hash=0611307c4daff394e74ec4a4cb1768eddcfa8db0)
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Benedict Arnold on March 15, 2009, 04:22:45 PM
Quote from: katmai on March 12, 2009, 09:04:51 PM
::) considering i have been the one creating and maintaning the leagues since kapland doubtful :p
Even the one IP set up?

Also, It's good to see the Broncos imploding.  Fuckers.  Cutler is being such a bitch about the whole situation.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on March 15, 2009, 04:39:04 PM
Cutler's still in junior high school.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: katmai on March 15, 2009, 05:48:44 PM
Quote from: Benedict Arnold on March 15, 2009, 04:22:45 PM
Quote from: katmai on March 12, 2009, 09:04:51 PM
::) considering i have been the one creating and maintaning the leagues since kapland doubtful :p
Even the one IP set up?


Yep i was commish of that one as well :P
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Vince on March 15, 2009, 08:23:22 PM
Quote from: Benedict Arnold on March 13, 2009, 03:39:25 PM
Quote from: Vince on March 13, 2009, 07:17:59 AM
As long as there isn't 2 feet of snow on the ground sure.
So... July?

:D  Better make it August just to be safe. 
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on March 16, 2009, 08:03:19 PM
Yeah!

http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d5d80f48fa8&template=without-video-with-comments&confirm=true

Quote
Posted about 1 hour ago

Patriots appear primed to make a deal with Panthers for Peppers

Vic Carucci   

The trade that sent Matt Cassel and Mike Vrabel to the Kansas City Chiefs appears to be only the first phase of some major wheeling and dealing by the New England Patriots this offseason.

The second phase, NFL sources say, is likely to involve a trade that would send Carolina Panthers defensive end Julius Peppers to the Patriots in exchange for the second-round pick (34th overall) they received from the Chiefs on Feb. 28.

According to league sources, the Patriots and Panthers are hoping to complete the deal at some point between the March 22-25 NFL owners meetings and the start of the draft on April 25.

Peppers, on whom the Panthers have placed a franchise tag that assures him of a one-year contract worth $16.68 million, would be converted to outside linebacker in New England's 3-4 defense.

The Patriots already were looking ahead to the possibility of acquiring Peppers when they shipped Cassel and Vrabel to Kansas City, NFL sources say, because they wanted to clear the salary-cap space necessary to sign Peppers to a new contract that would put him among the higher-paid defensive players in the league. After signing Cassel to a one-year, franchise-tag tender contract worth $14.65 million, New England had nearly $30 million in cap money devoted to two quarterbacks (including $14.62 million for Tom Brady).

Once the Patriots were convinced that Brady would be fully recovered from the season-ending knee injury he suffered last year, they were comfortable with trading his replacement to the Chiefs and putting the wheels in motion to bolster a defense that has gotten particularly old at linebacker. Vrabel and fellow linebacker Tedy Bruschi are well into the twilight of their respective careers.

NFL sources say the Panthers would welcome the chance to unload Peppers for a second-round draft pick, even though it would be well below his market value, because it would be less costly than signing a first-rounder. The Panthers already have made some belt-tightening financial moves within their front office.

This, in part, could help answer the lingering question of why the Patriots were willing to take only a second-round pick for Cassel and Vrabel rather than possibly go for a higher choice as part of a three-way deal involving the Denver Broncos, who were ready to give up Jay Cutler for Cassel. Without an additional second-round pick, the Patriots might not be able to pursue Peppers.

League sources also point out that the Panthers don't have a first-round choice after trading it to the Philadelphia Eagles and aren't scheduled to draft until 59th overall (near the bottom of the second round). The 34th spot would give Carolina the second pick of the second round and a chance to land a player with a first-round rating who was pushed down to that spot for whatever reason.

Also, according to NFL sources, there is a third phase to the Patriots' offseason strategy. They would like to further beef up their linebacking corps by adding an inside linebacker in the draft. They are known to believe that USC's Rey Maualuga would be a great fit for their scheme, especially when paired with Jerod Mayo, their 2008 first-round pick who was the NFL's top defensive rookie. However, some early projections suggest it might be a long shot for Maualuga to be available for the Patriots with the 23rd overall pick.

Patriots coach Bill Belichick is known for making excellent decisions when it comes to acquiring players, but at least one NFL player-personnel evaluator questions whether Peppers would be a good fit in New England.

"This is a guy who totally went on strike two years ago because he wasn't happy with his contract," said the player personnel source, who requested anonymity. "He's also very long (in the torso), which is not ideal for a 3-4 outside linebacker. And he can't drop into coverage. He's very stiff.

"But one of the things (the Patriots) are looking at is the fact that, in passing situations, they can have Peppers up front with (Richard) Seymour and (Jarvis) Green. That makes it easier for them to take (nose tackle Vince) Wilfork out of the game in (passing situations) and just play him on running downs."
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on March 16, 2009, 10:28:24 PM
Well, that's the end of the Patriots '09 season.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadImmortalMan on March 17, 2009, 12:05:45 AM
Oh, I didn't realize they traded Vrabel too. There goes the only redeeming thing the Pats had.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on March 17, 2009, 08:32:48 AM
Quote from: Neil on March 16, 2009, 10:28:24 PM
Well, that's the end of the Patriots '09 season.

That and Brady is too busy playing with his new Brazilian vagina and not rehabbing his knee.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: katmai on March 17, 2009, 08:53:41 AM
Quote from: Cindy Brady on March 17, 2009, 08:32:48 AM
Quote from: Neil on March 16, 2009, 10:28:24 PM
Well, that's the end of the Patriots '09 season.

That and Brady is too busy playing with his new Brazilian vagina

I can't blame him in that regard.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on March 17, 2009, 08:57:34 AM
Quote from: katmai on March 17, 2009, 08:53:41 AM
Quote from: Cindy Brady on March 17, 2009, 08:32:48 AM
Quote from: Neil on March 16, 2009, 10:28:24 PM
Well, that's the end of the Patriots '09 season.

That and Brady is too busy playing with his new Brazilian vagina

I can't blame him in that regard.
I can.  He's getting paid a fortune to rehab that knee.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on March 17, 2009, 08:57:45 AM
Quote from: katmai on March 17, 2009, 08:53:41 AM
Quote from: Cindy Brady on March 17, 2009, 08:32:48 AM
Quote from: Neil on March 16, 2009, 10:28:24 PM
Well, that's the end of the Patriots '09 season.

That and Brady is too busy playing with his new Brazilian vagina

I can't blame him in that regard.

It was a wonder he knew where to put his wang, since he was too busy servicing belichoke's ass.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Vince on March 17, 2009, 08:58:17 AM
Quote from: Neil on March 17, 2009, 08:57:34 AM
Quote from: katmai on March 17, 2009, 08:53:41 AM
Quote from: Cindy Brady on March 17, 2009, 08:32:48 AM
Quote from: Neil on March 16, 2009, 10:28:24 PM
Well, that's the end of the Patriots '09 season.

That and Brady is too busy playing with his new Brazilian vagina

I can't blame him in that regard.
I can.  He's getting paid a fortune to rehab that knee.

So you want him to be healthy going into the season?!?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on March 17, 2009, 10:29:59 AM
Quote from: Vince on March 17, 2009, 08:58:17 AM
So you want him to be healthy going into the season?!?
It doesn't matter.  Brady or no Brady, the Patriots are punkass bitches with no chance to win, especially now that other teams are sweeping for BelliCams.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on March 17, 2009, 04:15:30 PM
Stallworth to be charged with vehicular manslaughter and reckless driving! :o

http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/29694639/
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Strix on March 21, 2009, 07:53:13 AM
Ravens sign LJ Smith!  :D

Isn't that like Heap Part Deux? LJ Smith was good at times but seems to always be injured most of the year.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on March 21, 2009, 08:26:31 AM
Quote from: Strix on March 21, 2009, 07:53:13 AM
Ravens sign LJ Smith!  :D

Isn't that like Heap Part Deux? LJ Smith was good at times but seems to always be injured most of the year.
Smith's a good player, but I'm not sure what the point of signing him was.  He's not a better player than Daniel Wilcox, who was a valuable special teamer and sturdy blocker, and Heap will definitely start.  Moreover, Smith is a low-impact signing due to the fact he'll be a backup, and the fact that Cam Cameron's offence relies less on the TE position than Brian Billick's did.  Smith isn't a good blocking tight end, so I don't know what they were doing with that one.

1.5 million is pretty cheap, but Wilcox was only making 965k last year.  Why pay more for a guy who brings less?  Especially when you already have Todd Heap and Derrick Mason?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on March 22, 2009, 05:16:35 PM
Your Wonderlic scores for your favorite potiental draft pick:

http://www.faniq.com/blog/2009-NFL-Wonderlic-Scores-Matt-Stafford-Impresses-Blog-20999
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Vince on March 22, 2009, 05:46:50 PM
I could get my draft fix sooner!  Yay!

http://www.profootballweekly.com/PFW/Features/NFL+Features/2009/holbrook032209.htm (http://www.profootballweekly.com/PFW/Features/NFL+Features/2009/holbrook032209.htm)

QuoteOwners might consider moving NFL draft to late February

By Mike Holbrook
March 22, 2009

Indications are strong that the annual NFL owners meeting to be held March 22-25 in Dana Point, Calif., could be one of the most compelling gatherings in many years.

And the country's economic woes appear to be a big reason why.

Not only will the owners be hearing from the NFL's Competition Committee on a number of rules changes to impact games during the season, but whispers are growing louder that the league may be ready to consider making dramatic changes to the offseason schedule, including changing the dates for the postseason all-star games, the Scouting Combine, the draft and veteran free agency.

Multiple inside sources throughout the league have told PFW that the economic climate, coupled with the uncertainty of the next Collective Bargaining Agreement with the players in addition to the potential for an uncapped year in 2010 and a potential lockout in '11, have made cost-cutting measures a top priority.

The decision by commissioner Roger Goodell to take a 20 percent pay cut in annual salary and to eliminate 169 league jobs back in February might have been the prelude to bigger and bolder budgetary decisions, though nothing has been decided yet.

For instance, the draft has been held in late April or early May since 1977. However, there are a number of movers and shakers in the league who believe that veteran free agency should follow the draft, and with the CBA still to be agreed upon for the next contract, this issue could be a bargaining chip for owners.

Those same league insiders would like to see the draft moved to late February, with free agency to commence following rookie minicamps, most likely in mid-to-late March.

"They need to get the draft put ahead of free agency," one veteran talent evaluator told PFW.

If the draft were to be held two months earlier, it obviously would compress the time allowed to evaluate talent. All-star games for college seniors would be affected, as would the Scouting Combine.

The Senior Bowl, the most popular all-star game for player evaluation in the league and a traditional gathering spot for NFL coaches, GMs and scouts in the week before the Super Bowl, has been held in Mobile, Ala., for years. However, Senior Bowl organizers are looking for an NFL venue to move their event to and have given Tampa, Fla., exclusive negotiating rights to become the long-term home of the game.

The East-West Shrine Game, an all-star bowl game for college seniors that began in 1925 and spent 80 years in the San Francisco area before moving to Texas in 2006, is also seriously considering moving to Tampa.

By having both big senior showcases in the same city, the games could work in unison to attract the best talent and give prospects an opportunity to practice for two weeks in front of NFL decision makers, plus play games on back-to-back weekends.

The Combine would be held in early February following the Super Bowl. With little time for players to work out on their own and hold pro days at their school, the Combine would become even more important for prospects to show NFL scouts what they can do. It wouldn't be a surprise if the number of invitees to the Combine was increased to accommodate more prospects.

The biggest upside for the league and its 32 teams in combining the Senior Bowl and East-West Shrine Game in the same city along with an expanded Combine is tremendous travel savings. Expenses have grown exponentially over the years, with teams sending scouts across the country from all-star game to all-star game and from pro day to pro day. By making travel more efficient for scouts and personnel men, the league believes each team could save millions of dollars.

One other key factor in holding the draft earlier is that it is likely to limit the amount of input from the head coach and his assistants. It will force teams to rely more on their scouting staffs and personnel departments. The earlier draft will reward well-organized and talented scouting departments and expose less-talented, less-informed scouts.

With the league streamlining the draft in recent years and moving in the direction of making the first two rounds a prime-time event, the timing of a late-February draft would be excellent in terms of taking place during one of TV's key sweeps months. It also would be at a relatively dead time in the sports calendar — before college basketball's March Madness or baseball's spring training and well before the NBA or NHL playoffs begin.

The earlier draft would allow teams to select for need with younger players first, then see what they've got in minicamps before deciding whom to pursue in free agency. The system currently encourages teams to fill roster needs with veteran free agents before the draft.

Pro days won't go away. In fact, less-heralded draft-eligible players who aren't drafted could still hold pro days to showcase their skills when working out with juniors who are being evaluated in anticipation of the following year's draft. As a result, teams would be encouraged to start collecting information for the next draft as soon as possible and have their scouting departments be prepared to hit the ground running in the fall.

Finally, pushing up the draft would naturally create a lengthy break from league business — allowing for ample downtime in May and June — something that many league insiders believe is desperately needed to prevent burnout and the feeling of being on a treadmill that they can't get off.

"Some way, somehow, the NFL needs to find a way to give the league more of a break," a top executive told PFW. "It's like a treadmill that keeps getting faster and faster. They need to have a bigger window between the draft and free agency, regardless of which one comes first."
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on March 22, 2009, 09:35:59 PM
Sorry, but anything written in Pro Football Weekly is only marginally more credible than if it were posted from an .ru site.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Benedict Arnold on March 27, 2009, 02:30:02 PM
George still grasping for one last shot at glory: http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news;_ylt=Akv4VbSw4q_NTkLVdMPkfg45nYcB?slug=ms-thegameface032709&prov=yhoo&type=lgns (http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news;_ylt=Akv4VbSw4q_NTkLVdMPkfg45nYcB?slug=ms-thegameface032709&prov=yhoo&type=lgns).  Enjoy.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on March 27, 2009, 02:34:59 PM
Quote from: Benedict Arnold on March 27, 2009, 02:30:02 PM
George still grasping for one last shot at glory: http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news;_ylt=Akv4VbSw4q_NTkLVdMPkfg45nYcB?slug=ms-thegameface032709&prov=yhoo&type=lgns (http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news;_ylt=Akv4VbSw4q_NTkLVdMPkfg45nYcB?slug=ms-thegameface032709&prov=yhoo&type=lgns).  Enjoy.

^_^
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on April 02, 2009, 04:32:20 PM
PTI says Cutler is being traded to the Bears!
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on April 02, 2009, 04:47:54 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on April 02, 2009, 04:32:20 PM
PTI says Cutler is being traded to the Bears!
That would be awesome.  Cutler would finally prove himself to be a total loser.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: katmai on April 02, 2009, 04:52:54 PM
Cutler for Orton and 2 picks.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: JacobL on April 02, 2009, 05:00:09 PM
QuoteJay Cutler told FOXSports.com Wednesday night that he thought he would be traded to an NFC team. He was right. However, it was not the team to which everyone had him linked.

Cutler has been traded to the Chicago Bears for two first-round picks, a third-round pick and quarterback Kyle Orton, FOXSports.com has learned. Denver will receive Chicago's first- and third-round pick in this year's draft, and Chicago's first-round pick in 2010, along with Orton. The Bears get Cutler and the Broncos' fifth-round pick this year.

Denver will be fine, Chicago will continue to suck.  Cutler is going to have fun throwing to Hester and 2 decent TEs and no one else.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Vince on April 02, 2009, 05:10:19 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on April 02, 2009, 04:32:20 PM
PTI says Cutler is being traded to the Bears!

Oh Thank God!  I was afraid he'd get traded to NY.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on April 02, 2009, 05:11:08 PM
Quote from: JacobL on April 02, 2009, 05:00:09 PM
QuoteJay Cutler told FOXSports.com Wednesday night that he thought he would be traded to an NFC team. He was right. However, it was not the team to which everyone had him linked.

Cutler has been traded to the Chicago Bears for two first-round picks, a third-round pick and quarterback Kyle Orton, FOXSports.com has learned. Denver will receive Chicago's first- and third-round pick in this year's draft, and Chicago's first-round pick in 2010, along with Orton. The Bears get Cutler and the Broncos' fifth-round pick this year.

Denver will be fine, Chicago will continue to suck.  Cutler is going to have fun throwing to Hester and 2 decent TEs and no one else.
Indeed.  And even then, Hester isn't really that great a receiver.  He's pretty good, but he hasn't got the size or physicality to be truly great in today's game.

Now I'm torn.  I like Orton and want him to do well, but the Broncos are evil.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on April 02, 2009, 05:11:51 PM
Quote from: Vince on April 02, 2009, 05:10:19 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on April 02, 2009, 04:32:20 PM
PTI says Cutler is being traded to the Bears!

Oh Thank God!  I was afraid he'd get traded to NY.
As opposed to the guy you guys have now?  Nobody.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Vince on April 02, 2009, 05:18:57 PM
Quote from: Neil on April 02, 2009, 05:11:51 PM
Quote from: Vince on April 02, 2009, 05:10:19 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on April 02, 2009, 04:32:20 PM
PTI says Cutler is being traded to the Bears!

Oh Thank God!  I was afraid he'd get traded to NY.
As opposed to the guy you guys have now?  Nobody.

After last year's disaster with Favre I'd rather not give away the farm on another QB that would screw up at the end of the season. 
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on April 02, 2009, 05:21:42 PM
The jets need Jeff George.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Vince on April 02, 2009, 05:24:09 PM
Quote from: Ed Anger on April 02, 2009, 05:21:42 PM
The jets need Jeff George.

Nah we need a couple more Buckeye Alumni. 
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on April 02, 2009, 05:27:31 PM
Quote from: Vince on April 02, 2009, 05:24:09 PM
Quote from: Ed Anger on April 02, 2009, 05:21:42 PM
The jets need Jeff George.

Nah we need a couple more Buckeye Alumni.

Maybe they'll get another Mangold caliber player.

The Jets will regret losing the Nuge. REGRET IT.  :P
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Vince on April 02, 2009, 05:38:48 PM
Quote from: Ed Anger on April 02, 2009, 05:27:31 PM

Maybe they'll get another Mangold caliber player.

The Jets will regret losing the Nuge. REGRET IT.  :P

I would love seeing the Jets draft Chris Wells or Brian Robiskie.

Nuge will be shot out of the pirate ship cannon in Raymond James Stadium by a mob of angry Bucs fans after he screws up like he always does.   :P
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on April 02, 2009, 05:46:41 PM
Quote from: Vince on April 02, 2009, 05:38:48 PM
Nuge will be shot out of the pirate ship cannon in Raymond James Stadium by a mob of angry Bucs fans after he screws up like he always does.
The Bucs signed him?  How could anyone be so desperate for a kicker?  It's not like there's a shortage, and even some kid out of college could be brought in.  Why get a player who doesn't give you a chance to win?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on April 02, 2009, 05:47:03 PM
Hopefully, Beanie Wells won't screw his leg up talking on the phone. Or walking.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: JacobL on April 02, 2009, 06:00:14 PM
Quote from: Neil on April 02, 2009, 05:46:41 PM
Quote from: Vince on April 02, 2009, 05:38:48 PM
Nuge will be shot out of the pirate ship cannon in Raymond James Stadium by a mob of angry Bucs fans after he screws up like he always does.
The Bucs signed him?  How could anyone be so desperate for a kicker?  It's not like there's a shortage, and even some kid out of college could be brought in.  Why get a player who doesn't give you a chance to win?
Tired of their kicker not having the leg to actually make it go 50 yards let alone kick a 50 yard field goal accurately.  They figure just getting the ball further is a nice start even if it is a miss.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Grey Fox on April 02, 2009, 07:04:18 PM
Chicago :lol:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Barrister on April 02, 2009, 07:19:56 PM
I think its a good deal for Chicago. :uffda:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on April 02, 2009, 07:22:53 PM
Quote from: Barrister on April 02, 2009, 07:19:56 PM
I think its a good deal for Chicago. :uffda:
Which NFC North QB will Cutler start a feud with, distracting the team and resulting in yet another year outside the playoffs by the Bears?

As a Vikes fan, you must be happy.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on April 08, 2009, 04:42:18 AM
Kyle Boller is a St. Louis Ram.

The implosion of his career is now complete.   Sorry, Kyle.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on April 08, 2009, 08:47:13 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on April 08, 2009, 04:42:18 AM
Kyle Boller is a St. Louis Ram.

The implosion of his career is now complete.   Sorry, Kyle.
What are you talking about?  That's great news for him.  Bulger will go down, just like he does every year, and rather than playing in the toughest division in the NFL, Boller will be playing in the softest.  It's like being sent to a AAA-league to develop.

Boller is all set to begin his rise to glory.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on April 08, 2009, 11:46:42 AM
Quote from: Neil on April 02, 2009, 07:22:53 PM
Which NFC North QB will Cutler start a feud with, distracting the team and resulting in yet another year outside the playoffs by the Bears?

As a Vikes fan, you must be happy.

Cutler will start some shit with Sage, who will immediately helicopter into the Bears sidelines, killing Cutler and everyone around him.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Valmy on April 08, 2009, 01:18:51 PM
Rumors are flying Ocho Cinco is headed to a NFC East team...oh dear Hod please say it ain't so Snyder.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on April 08, 2009, 01:20:02 PM
Quote from: Valmy on April 08, 2009, 01:18:51 PM
Rumors are flying Ocho Cinco is headed to a NFC East team...oh dear Hod please say it ain't so Snyder.

Good. I'm tired of his shit and his fragility.

Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Grey Fox on April 08, 2009, 01:22:47 PM
Quote from: Ed Anger on April 08, 2009, 01:20:02 PM
Quote from: Valmy on April 08, 2009, 01:18:51 PM
Rumors are flying Ocho Cinco is headed to a NFC East team...oh dear Hod please say it ain't so Snyder.

Good. I'm tired of his shit and his fragility.

Sure because we will hear less of him when he joins the Giants? The Eagles or god forbid the Cowboys.

:bleeding:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Valmy on April 08, 2009, 01:23:31 PM
Quote from: Grey Fox on April 08, 2009, 01:22:47 PM
Sure because we will hear less of him when he joins the Giants? The Eagles or god forbid the Cowboys.

:bleeding:

Oh please let him join the Cowgirls.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on April 08, 2009, 01:26:10 PM
Quote from: Grey Fox on April 08, 2009, 01:22:47 PM
Quote from: Ed Anger on April 08, 2009, 01:20:02 PM
Quote from: Valmy on April 08, 2009, 01:18:51 PM
Rumors are flying Ocho Cinco is headed to a NFC East team...oh dear Hod please say it ain't so Snyder.

Good. I'm tired of his shit and his fragility.

Sure because we will hear less of him when he joins the Giants? The Eagles or god forbid the Cowboys.

:bleeding:

As long as he isn't fucking over the Bungles, I DON'T CARE.

I don't watch sportscenter, so my exposure would be limited, unlike now, where every local sports jackass has to have a segment on the newscast.

Ocho Cinco's time in Cincy has past. He sell by date is over.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Grey Fox on April 08, 2009, 01:39:42 PM
Quote from: Ed Anger on April 08, 2009, 01:26:10 PM
As long as he isn't fucking over the Bungles, I DON'T CARE.

I don't watch sportscenter, so my exposure would be limited, unlike now, where every local sports jackass has to have a segment on the newscast.

Ocho Cinco's time in Cincy has past. He sell by date is over.

Tank Johnson will take care of that.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Vince on April 08, 2009, 01:40:27 PM
Quote from: Ed Anger on April 08, 2009, 01:26:10 PM
Quote from: Grey Fox on April 08, 2009, 01:22:47 PM
Quote from: Ed Anger on April 08, 2009, 01:20:02 PM
Quote from: Valmy on April 08, 2009, 01:18:51 PM
Rumors are flying Ocho Cinco is headed to a NFC East team...oh dear Hod please say it ain't so Snyder.

Good. I'm tired of his shit and his fragility.

Sure because we will hear less of him when he joins the Giants? The Eagles or god forbid the Cowboys.

:bleeding:

As long as he isn't fucking over the Bungles, I DON'T CARE.

I don't watch sportscenter, so my exposure would be limited, unlike now, where every local sports jackass has to have a segment on the newscast.

Ocho Cinco's time in Cincy has past. He sell by date is over.

Coles just can't screw over a team like Chad. 
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Vince on April 08, 2009, 01:41:08 PM
Quote from: Valmy on April 08, 2009, 01:18:51 PM
Rumors are flying Ocho Cinco is headed to a NFC East team...oh dear Hod please say it ain't so Snyder.

Well rumors are that the Giants are trading for Braylon Edwards so it's not them. 
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on April 08, 2009, 01:42:08 PM
Quote from: Grey Fox on April 08, 2009, 01:39:42 PM
Quote from: Ed Anger on April 08, 2009, 01:26:10 PM
As long as he isn't fucking over the Bungles, I DON'T CARE.

I don't watch sportscenter, so my exposure would be limited, unlike now, where every local sports jackass has to have a segment on the newscast.

Ocho Cinco's time in Cincy has past. He sell by date is over.

Tank Johnson will take care of that.

Oh Mike Brown,  you naughty owner.

The Bungles might have some D now.  :lol:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on April 08, 2009, 02:01:48 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on April 08, 2009, 11:46:42 AM
Quote from: Neil on April 02, 2009, 07:22:53 PM
Which NFC North QB will Cutler start a feud with, distracting the team and resulting in yet another year outside the playoffs by the Bears?

As a Vikes fan, you must be happy.

Cutler will start some shit with Sage, who will immediately helicopter into the Bears sidelines, killing Cutler and everyone around him.
:lol:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on April 08, 2009, 02:04:02 PM
No Housh, no Oucho Stinko.  Are the Bengals actually going to have an offence left?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Barrister on April 08, 2009, 02:05:22 PM
SO tell me (since I now have to care about Sage Rosenfels):

-whats the "helicopter" story with him?   :huh:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on April 08, 2009, 02:11:53 PM
Quote from: Ed Anger on April 08, 2009, 01:42:08 PM
Oh Mike Brown,  you naughty owner.

The Bungles might have some D now.  :lol:
Some, but assuming Palmer stays healthy, he'll be throwing passes to tired old Coles.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on April 08, 2009, 02:13:57 PM
Quote from: Barrister on April 08, 2009, 02:05:22 PM
SO tell me (since I now have to care about Sage Rosenfels):

-whats the "helicopter" story with him?   :huh:
When he was a backup for the Texans, he lost them a game against the Colts by trying to jump through the air to gain extra yards on a scramble.  He got hit in midair, went spinning around, the ball went flying and his fumble was returned for a touchdown.

He was trying to be the man, but instead performed a legendary failure.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on April 08, 2009, 02:16:06 PM
Quote from: Neil on April 08, 2009, 02:04:02 PM
No Housh, no Oucho Stinko.  Are the Bengals actually going to have an offence left?

Cedric Benson.. snicker.

Sorry. Not much, other than Carson. The backups to WhoseyourMama and Ocho Attention Whore Cinco was mediocre. or in jail.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Barrister on April 08, 2009, 02:21:55 PM
Quote from: Neil on April 08, 2009, 02:13:57 PM
Quote from: Barrister on April 08, 2009, 02:05:22 PM
SO tell me (since I now have to care about Sage Rosenfels):

-whats the "helicopter" story with him?   :huh:
When he was a backup for the Texans, he lost them a game against the Colts by trying to jump through the air to gain extra yards on a scramble.  He got hit in midair, went spinning around, the ball went flying and his fumble was returned for a touchdown.

He was trying to be the man, but instead performed a legendary failure.

Thanks.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on April 08, 2009, 02:26:53 PM
Quote from: Barrister on April 08, 2009, 02:21:55 PM
Quote from: Neil on April 08, 2009, 02:13:57 PM
Quote from: Barrister on April 08, 2009, 02:05:22 PM
SO tell me (since I now have to care about Sage Rosenfels):

-whats the "helicopter" story with him?   :huh:
When he was a backup for the Texans, he lost them a game against the Colts by trying to jump through the air to gain extra yards on a scramble.  He got hit in midair, went spinning around, the ball went flying and his fumble was returned for a touchdown.

He was trying to be the man, but instead performed a legendary failure.

Thanks.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3_hi7gOjE0 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3_hi7gOjE0)

Here's a link.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on April 08, 2009, 02:27:14 PM
Quote from: Barrister on April 08, 2009, 02:21:55 PM
Quote from: Neil on April 08, 2009, 02:13:57 PM
Quote from: Barrister on April 08, 2009, 02:05:22 PM
SO tell me (since I now have to care about Sage Rosenfels):

-whats the "helicopter" story with him?   :huh:
When he was a backup for the Texans, he lost them a game against the Colts by trying to jump through the air to gain extra yards on a scramble.  He got hit in midair, went spinning around, the ball went flying and his fumble was returned for a touchdown.

He was trying to be the man, but instead performed a legendary failure.

Thanks.

The video:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3_hi7gOjE0

Note the score and time left (field position as well).  Also, Matt Schaub with the "WTF" look on his face.  :lol:

Beaten.  :mad:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on April 08, 2009, 05:32:33 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on April 08, 2009, 02:27:14 PM
Note the score and time left (field position as well).  Also, Matt Schaub with the "WTF" look on his face.  :lol:

Beaten.  :mad:

I don't care what anybody says, I gotta give props to a QB with that kind of moxie.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on April 08, 2009, 05:34:00 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on April 08, 2009, 05:32:33 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on April 08, 2009, 02:27:14 PM
Note the score and time left (field position as well).  Also, Matt Schaub with the "WTF" look on his face.  :lol:

Beaten.  :mad:

I don't care what anybody says, I gotta give props to a QB with that kind of moxie.
I like his moxie.  I don't like his decision-making process.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on April 08, 2009, 05:43:48 PM
Quote from: Neil on April 08, 2009, 05:34:00 PMI like his moxie.  I don't like his decision-making process.

[PrivateTrip]
Nigga forgot to duck, thas'all.
[/PrivateTrip]
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on April 08, 2009, 05:44:22 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on April 08, 2009, 05:32:33 PM
I don't care what anybody says, I gotta give props to a QB with that kind of moxie.

Yeah, he'd been kicking ass the whole game, and was just being aggressive and all, which is generally awesome, but fuck...he really just didn't need to at that point.  Then he just totally fell apart, lost the fumble on the next possession, then threw a game ending pick.  I have to agree with Neil here.  Balls of steel are usually good, but balls of steel combined with poor decision making is a disaster waiting to happen.  I doubt he'll do anything like that again though.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on April 15, 2009, 06:07:29 AM
The NFL schedules are out:

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4068983
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on April 15, 2009, 08:30:54 AM
Ravens schedule looks good, what with them playing the AFC West and the NFC North this year.  In a freak occurance, their schedule is actually tougher than that of the first-place Steelers, since Indy is a tougher team than the Titans and the Patriots are tougher than Miami.  Still, there's no reason to expect the Ravens not to win at least 10 games, and likely 12.

I'm amused to see the Cowboys get so many prime-time games when their prospects are so poor.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Valmy on April 15, 2009, 08:37:02 AM
The Redskins have the NFC West this year and NFC games against Detroit and St. Louis.  Surely even the they can get to the playoffs with that out of division cupcake schedule.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on April 15, 2009, 08:49:44 AM
Four of Houston's six division games are clustered right around their bye week (2x Colts, Titans, Jags).  Jets, San Francisco, Oakland, Seattle, New England at home.  Arizona, Cincy, Buffalo, St. Louis, and Miami on the road.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on April 15, 2009, 08:51:10 AM
Quote from: Valmy on April 15, 2009, 08:37:02 AM
The Redskins have the NFC West this year and NFC games against Detroit and St. Louis.  Surely even the they can get to the playoffs with that out of division cupcake schedule.
You mean the AFC West?  San Diego will be tough for Washington, and their game against Oakland is late enough that they'll probably have given up on Russell and be playing Jeff 'Victory Machine' Garcia.  Also, St. Louis has Kyle 'The Ultimate Weapon' Boller, although since you have them in Week 2, Bulger will likely still be unhurt.  Just watch out for Haynesworth crippling Bulger, bringing in the Unstoppable Force.

With the NFC South and their own brutal division games, it's going to be a tough year for the Redskins.  Then again, every year is a tough year for the NFC East teams, as they are very competitive with each other.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on April 15, 2009, 08:57:46 AM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on April 15, 2009, 08:49:44 AM
Four of Houston's six division games are clustered right around their bye week (2x Colts, Titans, Jags).  Jets, San Francisco, Oakland, Seattle, New England at home.  Arizona, Cincy, Buffalo, St. Louis, and Miami on the road.
This is the year for Houston to make a move.  The Colts are confused by their change in leadership and the Titans are demoralized by the fact that the Ravens took away their dream season, their quarterback is a very old man and their backup is the biggest bust since Leaf.  As for the Jags, we'll see if they can recover.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Vince on April 15, 2009, 09:26:49 AM
On paper all the AFC East team's schedules look very hard. 
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Valmy on April 15, 2009, 09:31:28 AM
Quote from: Neil on April 15, 2009, 08:51:10 AM
You mean the AFC West?

Yes :blush:

QuoteWith the NFC South and their own brutal division games, it's going to be a tough year for the Redskins.  Then again, every year is a tough year for the NFC East teams, as they are very competitive with each other.

Hope springs eternal!  Besides surely the Eagles and Cowboys are in decline.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on April 15, 2009, 09:37:46 AM
Quote from: Valmy on April 15, 2009, 09:31:28 AM
Hope springs eternal!  Besides surely the Eagles and Cowboys are in decline.
Maybe, maybe not.  It's not exactly clear that the Redskins are on the wax either.  The NFL certainly doesn't think the Cowboys are on the decline.  I rather expect a swath of articles on how they'll go undefeated.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Grey Fox on April 15, 2009, 10:11:46 AM
I want to play Fantasy Football again :(
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Barrister on April 15, 2009, 01:37:26 PM
Quote from: Neil on April 15, 2009, 08:30:54 AM
Still, there's no reason to expect the Ravens not to win at least 10 games,

:lmfao:

Don't et me wrong - the Ravens could very well wind up winning 10-12 games.  But to say there's no reason not to expect?  This is the NFL, the ultimate in league parity.  Any team can beat you on any given day.  Looking at the Ravens schedule, there are only 2 games that could/should be gimmies - against the Lions and the Raiders.  Other than that while there are games the Ravens should win (against the Chiefs, Browns x 2, Bengals x2) those are far from guaranteed wins.

And since someone needs to stand up for the NFC North, again excepting the hapless Lions all of those teams could be challenges for you...
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: sbr on April 15, 2009, 01:48:19 PM
Quote from: Neil on April 15, 2009, 08:30:54 AM
  Still, there's no reason to expect the Ravens not to win at least 10 games, and likely 12.

I'm amused to see the Cowboys get so many prime-time games when their prospects are so poor.
The loss of the defensive coordinator, the loss of Bart Scott, still no real playmakers at WR, the possibility of the dreaded sophomore slump by a possibly already overrated QB, a much tougher schedule with games at

San Diego
New England
Minnesota
Green Bay

Along with home games against Indy and Chicago
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on April 15, 2009, 02:15:08 PM
The loss of Bart Scott isn't actually a loss at all.  People have been predicting the doom of the Ravens every time a linebacker goes somewhere else.  Sharper, Hartwell, Boulware and Thomas were all predicted to take the key of the Ravens defence with them.  And yet the Ravens keep on doing well.  They'll miss Ryan, but the same principle holds true.  The Ravens D remained a force to be reckoned with after Marvin Lewis left, and after Mike Nolan left.  The WR issue isn't a serious issue, as while the team lacks a big, fast TO or Randy Moss-type receiver, you can't say that Derrick Mason doesn't make plays.  With Mark Clayton and Demetrius Williams, I have to say that I like the Ravens chances.  If you look at the way the receiving corps is built, it's a lot like the Steelers, who won a couple of Superbowls in the last decade.

The possibility of a sophomore slump isn't a serious concern.  It's always possible that any player in the league might blow a tire and fall apart.  Trying to predict that sort of thing is pointless and impossible.  It's hard to say that Flacco is overrated, since it seems to me that he's considered a good, but pedestrian QB.  It's not like we're talking about Brett Favre here.

As for the games, Baltimore matches up well against San Diego, and to a lesser extent New England.  Minnesota and Green Bay both suck.  Indy will almost certainly beat the Ravens due to their freaky Raven-killing mojo, but Chicago will not.  Cutler is trash, and will most certainly get jacked up.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: derspiess on April 15, 2009, 02:30:51 PM
Seems like the Bungles play the Broncos almost every year.  Not that I mind it *this* year, mind you :)
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on April 15, 2009, 05:34:22 PM
2009 strength of schedule rankings

Rank, Team, Opponents' 2008 winning %

Quote
28. Baltimore Ravens   .438
29. Pittsburgh Steelers    .434

12 wins?  Uh, yeah.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: sbr on April 15, 2009, 06:09:35 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on April 15, 2009, 05:34:22 PM
2009 strength of schedule rankings

Rank, Team, Opponents' 2008 winning %

Quote
28. Baltimore Ravens   .438
29. Pittsburgh Steelers    .434

12 wins?  Uh, yeah.

Last year the Steelers played the hardest schedule in NFL history, based on the previous year's winning percentage. (https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi195.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fz133%2Fsbr32%2Fsmilies%2Fshrug.gif&hash=192f9aca171f53ae2576f66866352c133c7ea785)
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on April 15, 2009, 06:13:48 PM
Quote from: sbr on April 15, 2009, 06:09:35 PM
Last year the Steelers played the hardest schedule in NFL history, based on the previous year's winning percentage. (https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi195.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fz133%2Fsbr32%2Fsmilies%2Fshrug.gif&hash=192f9aca171f53ae2576f66866352c133c7ea785)

Yeah, and how many squeakers did they pull out of their asses in the last half of the season? More than they'd want.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Strix on April 15, 2009, 07:28:10 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on April 15, 2009, 06:13:48 PM
Quote from: sbr on April 15, 2009, 06:09:35 PM
Last year the Steelers played the hardest schedule in NFL history, based on the previous year's winning percentage. (https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi195.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fz133%2Fsbr32%2Fsmilies%2Fshrug.gif&hash=192f9aca171f53ae2576f66866352c133c7ea785)

Yeah, and how many squeakers did they pull out of their asses in the last half of the season? More than they'd want.

Two more than the Ravens did.  :P
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on April 15, 2009, 07:36:50 PM
Quote from: Strix on April 15, 2009, 07:28:10 PMTwo more than the Ravens did.  :P


You are why the mod features here suck.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: katmai on April 15, 2009, 07:38:45 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on April 15, 2009, 07:36:50 PM
Quote from: Strix on April 15, 2009, 07:28:10 PMTwo more than the Ravens did.  :P


You are why the mod features here suck.

:lol:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: derspiess on April 16, 2009, 02:39:26 PM
For anyone interested, here is a look at how far things have come in the NFL from the days of watching game film on projectors.  The guy mentioned as the "Vicar of Video" ( :bleeding: the author is known for his horrible terminology ) is my brother.

http://www.bengals.com/news/article-1/cyber-draft/43a39f5e-b53c-4f50-abbb-2fddba7a846c
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Savonarola on April 20, 2009, 12:09:35 PM
Lions have a new logo:

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcmsimg.freep.com%2Fapps%2Fpbcsi.dll%2Fbilde%3FSite%3DC4%26amp%3BDate%3D20090420%26amp%3BCategory%3DSPORTS01%26amp%3BArtNo%3D90420033%26amp%3BRef%3DAR%26amp%3BProfile%3D1049%26amp%3BMaxW%3D550%26amp%3BMaxH%3D650%26amp%3Btitle%3D0&hash=8cfbac7084812a8bfa6b2b13c243cf9ceb431a54)

Can't you just feel the excitement building already?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadImmortalMan on April 20, 2009, 12:26:51 PM
OMG! Brilliant! The only thing left to do now is draft three or four new wide receivers, and the turnaround will be complete!
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Savonarola on April 20, 2009, 12:31:43 PM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on April 20, 2009, 12:26:51 PM
OMG! Brilliant! The only thing left to do now is draft three or four new wide receivers, and the turnaround will be complete!

It's going to be tough to do that without Matt Millen.

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fblacksportsonline.com%2Findex%2Fmatt-stupidity-millen.jpg&hash=1fdc7c39d50d1a342ab5cf4163356dd6293103f0)

The rumor from ground control is that he'll be replacing Emmit Smith on ESPN.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on April 20, 2009, 01:26:08 PM
Matt Millen can always go to the new UFL. I'm sure there is a team receptive to his 11 WR offense.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on April 20, 2009, 01:28:22 PM
It's funny listening to the talking heads talking about how nobody wants the #1 overall pick for fear of being embarassed by a huge bust.  I thought to myself:  "How is it possible for Detroit to be any more embarassed than they already are?"
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on April 20, 2009, 01:30:11 PM
Quote from: Savonarola on April 20, 2009, 12:31:43 PM
The rumor from ground control is that he'll be replacing Emmit Smith on ESPN.
It's shocking that someone who was so very, very bad as a GM would be not that bad as an analyst.  Maybe he should have spent more time analyzing the faults of the Lions and less time analyzing college wide receivers.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Savonarola on April 20, 2009, 01:31:18 PM
Quote from: Neil on April 20, 2009, 01:28:22 PM
It's funny listening to the talking heads talking about how nobody wants the #1 overall pick for fear of being embarassed by a huge bust.  I thought to myself:  "How is it possible for Detroit to be any more embarassed than they already are?"

Short of going 0-16 again, I really don't know; but if there is a way The Lions will find it.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Grey Fox on April 22, 2009, 09:27:26 AM
For those who have it, how's NFL Sunday Ticket?

Around here, it comes bundle with NHL Center Ice (yay!) and MLD Extra Innings for 30$/month
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on April 22, 2009, 11:14:12 AM
Quote from: Grey Fox on April 22, 2009, 09:27:26 AM
For those who have it, how's NFL Sunday Ticket?
I enjoy it very much.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Grey Fox on April 22, 2009, 11:17:08 AM
I'm thinking about it. One can only watch so many Patriot, Jets & Giants games.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Vince on April 22, 2009, 05:01:25 PM
Quote from: Grey Fox on April 22, 2009, 11:17:08 AM
I'm thinking about it. One can only watch so many Patriot, Jets & Giants games.

Heretic!  You can never watch enough Jets games.   :P
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on April 22, 2009, 05:14:14 PM
Quote from: Vince on April 22, 2009, 05:01:25 PM
Quote from: Grey Fox on April 22, 2009, 11:17:08 AM
I'm thinking about it. One can only watch so many Patriot, Jets & Giants games.

Heretic!  You can never watch enough Jets games.   :P
Watching a Jets game last year was like being drowned in a vat of media semen by Brett Favre.

I'm glad he's retired once and for all.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on April 22, 2009, 05:21:24 PM
Quote from: Neil on April 22, 2009, 05:14:14 PM
Quote from: Vince on April 22, 2009, 05:01:25 PM
Quote from: Grey Fox on April 22, 2009, 11:17:08 AM
I'm thinking about it. One can only watch so many Patriot, Jets & Giants games.

Heretic!  You can never watch enough Jets games.   :P
Watching a Jets game last year was like being drowned in a vat of media semen by Brett Favre.

I'm glad he's retired once and for all.

Watching any game last year was like being drowned in a vat of Favre spunk. Especially if that fuck Kornheiser was yapping.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on April 22, 2009, 05:27:58 PM
Quote from: Ed Anger on April 22, 2009, 05:21:24 PM
Watching any game last year was like being drowned in a vat of Favre spunk. Especially if that fuck Kornheiser was yapping.
He does seem to have the most 'media' opinion possible, and an inability to shut up about it, doesn't he?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on April 22, 2009, 05:30:01 PM
Quote from: Neil on April 22, 2009, 05:27:58 PM
Quote from: Ed Anger on April 22, 2009, 05:21:24 PM
Watching any game last year was like being drowned in a vat of Favre spunk. Especially if that fuck Kornheiser was yapping.
He does seem to have the most 'media' opinion possible, and an inability to shut up about it, doesn't he?

He is the Tim of announcers.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on April 22, 2009, 09:36:26 PM
Quote from: Savonarola on April 20, 2009, 12:09:35 PM
Lions have a new logo:

Can't you just feel the excitement building already?

I like it, but its not gonna to help them stop sucking.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Grey Fox on April 23, 2009, 06:48:47 AM
Quote from: Vince on April 22, 2009, 05:01:25 PM
Quote from: Grey Fox on April 22, 2009, 11:17:08 AM
I'm thinking about it. One can only watch so many Patriot, Jets & Giants games.

Heretic!  You can never watch enough Jets games.   :P

The real problem is that it's usually a freaking Patriot game.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on April 23, 2009, 07:14:42 AM
Quote from: Grey Fox on April 23, 2009, 06:48:47 AM
The real problem is that it's usually a freaking Patriot game.
Bandwagonners (like Tim) love the Patriots.  After they lose a bunch this season and next season, missing the playoffs, you won't have to worry about that anymore.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on April 23, 2009, 07:17:55 AM
Hopefully, one good hit this pre-season, and we the fans won't have to see Tom Brady for awhile. Assuming he is ready, since it seems he would rather travel the world than rehab.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Grey Fox on April 23, 2009, 07:25:41 AM
Quote from: Neil on April 23, 2009, 07:14:42 AM
Quote from: Grey Fox on April 23, 2009, 06:48:47 AM
The real problem is that it's usually a freaking Patriot game.
Bandwagonners (like Tim) love the Patriots.  After they lose a bunch this season and next season, missing the playoffs, you won't have to worry about that anymore.

I wish but the channels I get are Patriot Locals
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on April 23, 2009, 07:31:58 AM
Quote from: Ed Anger on April 23, 2009, 07:17:55 AM
Hopefully, one good hit this pre-season, and we the fans won't have to see Tom Brady for awhile. Assuming he is ready, since it seems he would rather travel the world than rehab.
I doubt he'll play in the preseason.  We'll have to wait until week 1 for the career-ender on Brady.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Strix on April 23, 2009, 09:35:32 AM
Jets moving preseason camp to Cortland, NY...

Are the Jets placing themselves in position to poach Western NY fans once the Bills move to Toronto?

Talk amongst yourselves!
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: charliebear on April 23, 2009, 09:38:46 AM
Quote from: Savonarola on April 20, 2009, 01:31:18 PM
Quote from: Neil on April 20, 2009, 01:28:22 PM
It's funny listening to the talking heads talking about how nobody wants the #1 overall pick for fear of being embarassed by a huge bust.  I thought to myself:  "How is it possible for Detroit to be any more embarassed than they already are?"

Short of going 0-16 again, I really don't know; but if there is a way The Lions will find it.

Any bets this year?  You picking that the Lions would at least finish average was one of the easiest bets I've won.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadImmortalMan on April 23, 2009, 11:16:54 AM
Quote from: charliebear on April 23, 2009, 09:38:46 AM
Quote from: Savonarola on April 20, 2009, 01:31:18 PM
Quote from: Neil on April 20, 2009, 01:28:22 PM
It's funny listening to the talking heads talking about how nobody wants the #1 overall pick for fear of being embarassed by a huge bust.  I thought to myself:  "How is it possible for Detroit to be any more embarassed than they already are?"

Short of going 0-16 again, I really don't know; but if there is a way The Lions will find it.

Any bets this year?  You picking that the Lions would at least finish average was one of the easiest bets I've won.


They'll get a fresh new rookie quarterback, and the weight of the entire team will be on his shoulders. How well you think that's gonna go?  :P
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Savonarola on April 23, 2009, 11:33:18 AM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on April 23, 2009, 11:16:54 AM
Quote from: charliebear on April 23, 2009, 09:38:46 AM


Any bets this year?  You picking that the Lions would at least finish average was one of the easiest bets I've won.


They'll get a fresh new rookie quarterback, and the weight of the entire team will be on his shoulders. How well you think that's gonna go?  :P

Better than last year.  I think the Lions will be terrible, but not as terrible as last year; say 2-14.

Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on April 23, 2009, 02:39:08 PM
Tony Gonzales traded to the Falcons for a 2nd round pick in 2010.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on April 23, 2009, 05:15:25 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on April 23, 2009, 02:39:08 PM
Tony Gonzales traded to the Falcons for a 2nd round pick in 2010.

Tony becomes a first-round fantasy draft pick again.

Fucking Atlanta's offense is going to be sick this season.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Grey Fox on April 23, 2009, 05:44:50 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on April 23, 2009, 05:15:25 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on April 23, 2009, 02:39:08 PM
Tony Gonzales traded to the Falcons for a 2nd round pick in 2010.

Tony becomes a first-round fantasy draft pick again.

Fucking Atlanta's offense is going to be sick this season.

:yeah:

Sadly my luck of getting their RB & both of their WR is probably not going to happen again.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Vince on April 23, 2009, 05:53:31 PM
Less than 48 hours until the draft.   :cool:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on April 23, 2009, 07:01:50 PM
Why hasn't Rex Francorum shown me seven or eight mock drafts?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on April 23, 2009, 07:12:26 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on April 23, 2009, 05:15:25 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on April 23, 2009, 02:39:08 PM
Tony Gonzales traded to the Falcons for a 2nd round pick in 2010.

Tony becomes a first-round fantasy draft pick again.

Fucking Atlanta's offense is going to be sick this season.
Provided that Ryan holds it together, although I think he'll be fine.

The NFC South is now home to solid QB talent.  The exception is Tampa Bay, who decided that they didn't want Jeff Garcia the Winning Machine.  They'd rather have such luminaries as Luke McCown, Brian Griese and Byron Leftwich running their offence.  Maybe, if Detroit takes Stafford, they can trade for Daunte Culpepper and complete their stable of failures.

Ever since Kiffin left, Tampa Bay has gone completely retarded.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Vince on April 23, 2009, 07:24:56 PM
Quote from: Neil on April 23, 2009, 07:01:50 PM
Why hasn't Rex Francorum shown me seven or eight mock drafts?

http://www.hailredskins.com/MockDraft.htm (http://www.hailredskins.com/MockDraft.htm)

Good enough?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: sbr on April 24, 2009, 03:01:38 AM
Quote from: Grey Fox on April 22, 2009, 09:27:26 AM
For those who have it, how's NFL Sunday Ticket?

Around here, it comes bundle with NHL Center Ice (yay!) and MLD Extra Innings for 30$/month
I had it the last 5 or so years and I loved it.  Unfortunately I can't afford it this year so I will be stuck with watching the fucking Seahawks every Sunday again.

Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on April 24, 2009, 11:14:09 PM
Stafford is the pick for Detroit.  http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4097641
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on April 24, 2009, 11:27:02 PM
Quote from: Neil on April 23, 2009, 07:01:50 PM
Why hasn't Rex Francorum shown me seven or eight mock drafts?
Did he make the transition to the new board?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on April 24, 2009, 11:28:34 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on April 24, 2009, 11:14:09 PM
Stafford is the pick for Detroit.  http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4097641
Crazy to risk that much money. That poor guy is gonna be hammered into the ground until he turns into a David Carr clone.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: sbr on April 24, 2009, 11:46:11 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on April 24, 2009, 11:28:34 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on April 24, 2009, 11:14:09 PM
Stafford is the pick for Detroit.  http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4097641
Crazy to risk that much money. That poor guy is gonna be hammered into the ground until he turns into a David Carr clone.
Yep.

At least they got him signed and he will be around all off-season, that could give him a slim fighting chance, unlikely though.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on April 25, 2009, 07:26:22 AM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on April 24, 2009, 11:28:34 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on April 24, 2009, 11:14:09 PM
Stafford is the pick for Detroit.  http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4097641
Crazy to risk that much money. That poor guy is gonna be hammered into the ground until he turns into a David Carr clone.
Especially in that division.  Minnesota is a sack machine and Chicago should be (although they had an off year last year).  Still, it wasn't like it was quarterback talent that was holding the Lions back.  John Kitna would throw for 4,000 yards per season.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on April 25, 2009, 08:13:54 AM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on April 24, 2009, 11:28:34 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on April 24, 2009, 11:14:09 PM
Stafford is the pick for Detroit.  http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4097641
Crazy to risk that much money. That poor guy is gonna be hammered into the ground until he turns into a David Carr clone.

They should Carson Palmer the guy. He can watch Dante Culpepper play next year. Too bad Kitna isn't around, he was a good teacher.

But since this is the Lions, Stafford will play and get his first concussion in week 1.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on April 25, 2009, 09:10:42 AM
Quote from: Ed Anger on April 25, 2009, 08:13:54 AM
They should Carson Palmer the guy. He can watch Dante Culpepper play next year. Too bad Kitna isn't around, he was a good teacher.

But since this is the Lions, Stafford will play and get his first concussion in week 1.
Well, after Flacco and Ryan last year, everybody thinks that rookies should be able to walk right in and start winning.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on April 25, 2009, 09:22:26 AM
Quote from: Ed Anger on April 25, 2009, 08:13:54 AM
But since this is the Lions, Stafford will play and get his first concussion in week 1.

Eric Hipple, Thy Will Be Done.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on April 27, 2009, 08:25:07 AM
Dunta Robinson is threatening to hold out if the Texans franchise him.  It's starting to get a little ridiculous with this guy.  He supposedly turned down an offer with $23 million guaranteed the year after coming back from a massive injury and not looking so hot, which is why they ended up wanting to franchise him in the first place.   

$23 million.  That's some pretty...er...good money....for a guy who has never been to a Pro Bowl, and who they're still not sure will ever be the same again.  If they franchise him, that would be ~$10 million or so for one year.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on April 28, 2009, 01:31:06 PM
I think that Brian Cushing might be retarded.  He wears his hat like a moron.

Also, somebody made Bellichick wear a suit on draft day!
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on April 28, 2009, 01:41:54 PM
Quote from: Neil on April 28, 2009, 01:31:06 PM
I think that Brian Cushing might be retarded.  He wears his hat like a moron.

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.championshipfootballclinics.com%2Fimages%2FCushing%2520at%2520Rosebowl.jpg&hash=ef5f9eb2a025b823461c099eb6c44d23da3ddddf)

Looks like the thing covering his head so he doesn't die when he smashes into people is worn properly.  I don't give a fuck about anything else.

Edit:
QuoteAlso, somebody made Bellichick wear a suit on draft day!

I'm not sure I believe you. :mellow:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on April 28, 2009, 01:50:39 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on April 28, 2009, 01:41:54 PM
The thing covering his head so he doesn't die when he smashes into people looks fine to me.  I don't give a fuck about anything else.
You'll care when he accidentally tackles Mario Williams just as Williams is about to sack Peyton Manning in the endzone, and the ball goes to Reggie Wayne for a touchdown, allowing the Colts to win the division and causing the Texans to miss the playoffs.  Moreover, Williams' knee ligaments will all explode.

Just looking at him wearing his baseball cap, you know that there's something horribly wrong with him.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on April 28, 2009, 01:52:26 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on April 28, 2009, 01:41:54 PM
I'm not sure I believe you. :mellow:
:lol:

How many times did you edit that post?

Yeah, I saw the video on the NFL Network.  I was shocked.  The suit didn't quite fit, but it was there.  Rather than looking homeless, he looked like a Wal-Mart assistant manager or something.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on April 28, 2009, 02:15:21 PM
Quote from: Neil on April 28, 2009, 01:52:26 PM
:lol:

How many times did you edit that post?

Yeah, I saw the video on the NFL Network.  I was shocked.  The suit didn't quite fit, but it was there.  Rather than looking homeless, he looked like a Wal-Mart assistant manager or something.

:lol:  About 10.  The first few times, my brain simply couldn't wrap itself the idea that the dude had worn a suit, (edit: or that someone had actually seen him wearing one) and was churning out suggestions so he at least wouldn't look homeless.  Striking stuff out that was too much, like a collared shirt, etc.  Then I started changing everything in the post around.  Like this one ( :P).
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: derspiess on April 28, 2009, 02:30:13 PM
Quote from: Neil on April 28, 2009, 01:50:39 PM
Just looking at him wearing his baseball cap, you know that there's something horribly wrong with him.

Is it off to the center and/or with the bill raised up too high?  Dudes who wear hats that way look like they have gone full retard.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on April 28, 2009, 02:34:43 PM
Quote from: derspiess on April 28, 2009, 02:30:13 PM
Is it off to the center and/or with the bill raised up too high?  Dudes who wear hats that way look like they have gone full retard.

It was a bit off center, but I don't think it was on purpose like some of them do, so he looked slightly retarded with greasy long hair, all roided up, etc. 

Edit:  He doesn't appear to be able to put one on straight.
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fassets.houstontexans.com%2Fuploads%2Fphoto%2Ftop_story%2F10113.jpg&hash=bbe6a3107ad23717b29ea9859ab5c07f40ae7106)

Eh heh heh.  There's a video interview with him here: http://www.houstontexans.com/index2.html
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on April 28, 2009, 02:43:28 PM
Of the 3 USC linebackers, he did look like the biggest douchebag of the bunch. And Rey Maualuga would be on an episode of Dog the bounty hunter running from the Dog.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: sbr on April 28, 2009, 06:13:11 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on April 28, 2009, 02:34:43 PM
Quote from: derspiess on April 28, 2009, 02:30:13 PM
Is it off to the center and/or with the bill raised up too high?  Dudes who wear hats that way look like they have gone full retard.

It was a bit off center, but I don't think it was on purpose like some of them do, so he looked slightly retarded with greasy long hair, all roided up, etc. 

Edit:  He doesn't appear to be able to put one on straight.


Eh heh heh.  There's a video interview with him here: http://www.houstontexans.com/index2.html
It's his fancy ponytail that keep the hat from fitting right; he sounds as intelligent as a box of hammers.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: katmai on April 28, 2009, 06:14:28 PM
But he went to USC!

:lol:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on April 28, 2009, 07:14:27 PM
Quote from: Neil on April 28, 2009, 01:52:26 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on April 28, 2009, 01:41:54 PM
I'm not sure I believe you. :mellow:
:lol:

How many times did you edit that post?

Yeah, I saw the video on the NFL Network.  I was shocked.  The suit didn't quite fit, but it was there.  Rather than looking homeless, he looked like a Wal-Mart assistant manager or something.

He looked hilarious, and totally uncomfortable.  What a dickhead.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: JacobL on April 28, 2009, 08:51:56 PM
QuoteJets waived QB Brett Favre off their reserve/retired list.
This could mean nothing, or it could mean something. Players waived off the retired list become free agents, and there have been some rumors lately that Favre is contemplating a return. Something had to spur this transaction, because the Jets would've just left Favre on reserve/retired otherwise. It's possible Favre wants to sign a one-year contract to retire as a Packer. It's also possible that the Vikings want him again.

According to rotoworld

:lol:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Sophie Scholl on April 29, 2009, 01:28:42 AM
A list of undrafted free agent signings, sadly from a Patriotard fansite.  http://www.nepatriotsdraft.com/2009/04/2009-undrafted-free-agent-signings-list.html (http://www.nepatriotsdraft.com/2009/04/2009-undrafted-free-agent-signings-list.html)
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on April 29, 2009, 09:45:10 AM
http://www.thebrushback.com/draftgrades.htm

QuotePete Carroll must feel pretty stupid. He said Sanchez wasn't even ready for the NFL, and the kid turned out to be the greatest quarterback in the history of the game. Grade: A plus plus

QuoteThis surprise selection was actually intended as a smokescreen until the Raiders realized you had to keep whatever players you selected. Grade: F

QuoteEverybody's criticizing the choice of Moreno here. Perhaps the Broncos should have drafted someone the experts were higher on, like Vince Young or Reggie Bush. Grade: D

QuoteJerry is a tough, passionate warrior who will immediately upgrade the Falcons front seven. But he's not Mark Sanchez, so fuck him. Grade: F minus minus

:D
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Barrister on April 29, 2009, 11:12:07 AM
Apparently the Jets released Brett Favre, thus making him eligible to sign with any team he might choose if he decided to unretire again.

:shifty:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on April 29, 2009, 11:22:25 AM
Quote from: Barrister on April 29, 2009, 11:12:07 AM
Apparently the Jets released Brett Favre, thus making him eligible to sign with any team he might choose if he decided to unretire again.

:shifty:
That has-been should just stay retired.  He's got nothing left, and he's only damaging himself by staying on.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Barrister on April 29, 2009, 11:31:20 AM
Quote from: Neil on April 29, 2009, 11:22:25 AM
Quote from: Barrister on April 29, 2009, 11:12:07 AM
Apparently the Jets released Brett Favre, thus making him eligible to sign with any team he might choose if he decided to unretire again.

:shifty:
That has-been should just stay retired.  He's got nothing left, and he's only damaging himself by staying on.

He'd be an upgrade from Tavaris Jackson and Sage Rosenfels... :shifty:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on April 29, 2009, 11:41:56 AM
Quote from: Barrister on April 29, 2009, 11:31:20 AM
He'd be an upgrade from Tavaris Jackson and Sage Rosenfels... :shifty:
For the first couple weeks, maybe.  As the season drags on, and he turns into an interception machine, you might rethink that.  I guess it boils down to what do you want from the Vikings?  Would you like them to try and develop in areas that they can improve?  Or would you rather use a roster spot and a chunk of the salary cap on a player who can't get you to the playoffs?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: JacobL on April 29, 2009, 11:50:46 AM
Quote from: Barrister on April 29, 2009, 11:12:07 AM
Apparently the Jets released Brett Favre, thus making him eligible to sign with any team he might choose if he decided to unretire again.

:shifty:
Quote from: JacobL on April 28, 2009, 08:51:56 PM
QuoteJets waived QB Brett Favre off their reserve/retired list.
This could mean nothing, or it could mean something. Players waived off the retired list become free agents, and there have been some rumors lately that Favre is contemplating a return. Something had to spur this transaction, because the Jets would've just left Favre on reserve/retired otherwise. It's possible Favre wants to sign a one-year contract to retire as a Packer. It's also possible that the Vikings want him again.

According to rotoworld

:lol:

You don't say? :P
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Sophie Scholl on April 30, 2009, 01:29:22 AM
Quote from: Barrister on April 29, 2009, 11:31:20 AM
He'd be an upgrade from Tavaris Jackson and Sage Rosenfels... :shifty:
There's a few servicable quarterbacks still on the open market or availible for minimal cost from teams where they're residing as second or third stringers.  All of whom probably have a better chance of lasting a full season and costing a tiny fraction of the amount Favre would command in salary figures.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on May 05, 2009, 05:11:58 AM
Ozzie stockpiles Mormons.

QuoteA few days before the start of their first minicamp, the Ravens shuffled their quarterback group, signing John Beck to a one-year contract and cutting third-stringer Todd Bouman.

Beck, a 2007 second-round pick of the Miami Dolphins, is expected to compete against Troy Smith for the Ravens' backup quarterback job.

"He was a very productive college player, but what also impressed our scouts was how competitive he is," Ravens general manager Ozzie Newsome said Monday. "We like to bring in good athletes who love to compete and he fits that."

Beck, 27, who was released by the Dolphins last week, reportedly drew interest from six teams. He eventually chose the Ravens over the Jacksonville Jaguars.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: katmai on May 05, 2009, 07:38:10 PM
I'm shocked, shocked i say to hear this.

QuoteReport: Favre to meet with Vikings coach Childress

1 hour, 6 minutes ago


MINNEAPOLIS (AP)—Just when Brett Favre looked to finally be out, the Minnesota Vikings could be pulling him back in.

Citing an anonymous source “with direct knowledge of the discussions between the two parties,” ESPN reported Tuesday that Favre is scheduled to meet with Vikings coach Brad Childress later this week about a possible comeback with Minnesota.

Favre’s agent, Bus Cook, did not immediately return a phone call to his Mississippi office left by The Associated Press.

Childress and Vikings spokesman Bob Hagan also did not immediately return messages.

Both Favre and Cook have said this spring that Favre intends to stay retired. But Favre’s statement after he was released by the New York Jets last week left the door open.

“At this time, I am retired and have no intention of returning to football,” he said.

Those three little words—“At this time”—set off rampant speculation that he was indeed considering a second return to action.

Childress said Friday he had been too busy to concentrate on Favre, but did acknowledge the subject would soon be broached.

“We talk about everything,” Childress said then, “from what’s going on in the United States on the front page today. … We talk about everything, so yeah, I’m sure we’ll talk about that.”

It wouldn’t be the first time.

Favre spent 16 seasons in Green Bay, retiring in 2008 after leading the Packers to the NFC title game. He changed his mind a few months later, which set up a long and messy soap opera that ultimately led to his trade to the Jets.

It was believed all along that Favre, after hearing Green Bay’s plans to go with Aaron Rodgers at quarterback, wanted to come to NFC North rival Minnesota so he could exact some revenge on the Packers.

But the Packers would have none of it. The team filed tampering charges against the Vikings, alleging improper contact between Favre and Vikings offensive coordinator Darrell Bevell, a friend of Favre’s from his days as Green Bay’s quarterbacks coach.

The league cleared the Vikings of all charges. Green Bay included in the trade to New York a clause that made it all but impossible for the Jets to turn around and ship Favre to the Vikings.

But when the Jets granted the 39-year-old Favre his release last week, it made him a free agent who is eligible to sign with any team he chooses. And many experts say the Vikings are a quarterback away from being a legitimate Super Bowl contender.

With unproven veterans Sage Rosenfels and Tarvaris Jackson slated to duke it out in training camp for the starting job, it would come as no surprise that the Vikings would at least consider adding a three-time MVP who holds the career records in every major statistical passing category, including interceptions.

But the move would not come without questions.

After an impressive start to his first and only season in New York—he threw a career-high six touchdown passes in a win over Arizona in Week 4— Favre’s production dipped considerably over the final five games while he dealt with shoulder and biceps injuries. He threw nine interceptions in that span and the Jets stumbled to a 1-4 finish.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on May 05, 2009, 08:13:58 PM
Well, looks like the Vikings are ready to write off their season.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Sophie Scholl on May 06, 2009, 02:39:05 AM
 :bleeding: Not again... again.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: sbr on May 07, 2009, 05:08:08 PM
Nope, not again.

QuoteThe Minnesota Vikings will not sign free-agent quarterback Brett Favre(notes), a source close to the team told Yahoo! Sports on Thursday.

In a phone call that took place sometime in the last day, the source said Favre told Vikings coach Brad Childress that he wanted to remain retired. Favre is expected to publicly explain his decision soon.

Favre, who announced his first retirement in March 2008 after spending 16 seasons with the Green Bay Packers, decided to resume his career last summer and was traded to the New York Jets in August. After one season in New York, Favre retired again and was subsequently released by the Jets on April 29.

Just days after his release from the Jets, speculation began that the Vikings were interested in bringing in a veteran to compete with Sage Rosenfels(notes), who was acquired this offseason from the Houston Texans. Rosenfels is atop the depth chart heading into training camp, with Tarvaris Jackson and John David Booty(notes) also on the roster.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news;_ylt=Alyd_f3QkLt.._r4ny8UHOJDubYF?slug=ys-favre050709&prov=yhoo&type=lgns

Thank goodness.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: katmai on May 07, 2009, 06:17:47 PM
Heh let's see if he's singing same song in July.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on May 07, 2009, 06:25:47 PM
Bungles signed Roy Williams, so I assume he'll hit hard, yet play shitty pass defense like he normally does.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on May 07, 2009, 06:40:35 PM
Quote from: Ed Anger on May 07, 2009, 06:25:47 PM
Bungles signed Roy Williams, so I assume he'll hit hard, yet play shitty pass defense like he normally does.
That's a mistake on your part.  It would be safer to assume that he'll horsecollar a few guys, giving up first downs on critical drives, and then get knocked out for the season by an injury (possibly sustained while horsecollaring someone).
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on May 07, 2009, 06:43:00 PM
Quote from: Neil on May 07, 2009, 06:40:35 PM
Quote from: Ed Anger on May 07, 2009, 06:25:47 PM
Bungles signed Roy Williams, so I assume he'll hit hard, yet play shitty pass defense like he normally does.
That's a mistake on your part.  It would be safer to assume that he'll horsecollar a few guys, giving up first downs on critical drives, and then get knocked out for the season by an injury (possibly sustained while horsecollaring someone).

If he horsecollars at least 1 Steeler, it will all be worth it.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on May 07, 2009, 06:45:20 PM
Quote from: Ed Anger on May 07, 2009, 06:43:00 PM
Quote from: Neil on May 07, 2009, 06:40:35 PM
Quote from: Ed Anger on May 07, 2009, 06:25:47 PM
Bungles signed Roy Williams, so I assume he'll hit hard, yet play shitty pass defense like he normally does.
That's a mistake on your part.  It would be safer to assume that he'll horsecollar a few guys, giving up first downs on critical drives, and then get knocked out for the season by an injury (possibly sustained while horsecollaring someone).

If he horsecollars at least 1 Steeler, it will all be worth it.
It certainly would be amusing to see Hines Ward's shinbone explode out of his leg.  The downside to this is that he might try that shit on Derrick Mason.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on May 07, 2009, 07:32:01 PM
Quote from: Neil on May 07, 2009, 06:45:20 PM
Quote from: Ed Anger on May 07, 2009, 06:43:00 PM
Quote from: Neil on May 07, 2009, 06:40:35 PM
Quote from: Ed Anger on May 07, 2009, 06:25:47 PM
Bungles signed Roy Williams, so I assume he'll hit hard, yet play shitty pass defense like he normally does.
That's a mistake on your part.  It would be safer to assume that he'll horsecollar a few guys, giving up first downs on critical drives, and then get knocked out for the season by an injury (possibly sustained while horsecollaring someone).

If he horsecollars at least 1 Steeler, it will all be worth it.
It certainly would be amusing to see Hines Ward's shinbone explode out of his leg.  The downside to this is that he might try that shit on Derrick Mason.

This is true; he's got three broken legs under his belt, two more and he's an ace.  So look out.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Savonarola on May 12, 2009, 03:15:18 PM
QuoteFord ranked second-worst NFL owner; Ilitch No. 1 in NHL
The Detroit News
Mike Ilitch is the best owner in the NHL, according to Sports Illustrated, while William Clay Ford is ranked the second-worst in the NFL.

SI.com ranked the five best and five worst owners in the four major sports using the following criteria:

* Team's success or failure on the field.


* Willingness to spend money to improve the team.

* Stability and capabilities of the front office and management.

* Amenities at the team's venue.

* Club's culture and interactivity with fans.

Here are the rankings:

NFL

Five Best

1. Rooney Family, Pittsburgh Steelers

2. Robert Kraft, New England Patriots

3. Mara and Tisch Families, New York Giants

4. Jeffrey Lurie, Philadelphia Eagles

5. Steve Bisciotti, Baltimore Ravens

Five Worst

1. Al Davis, Oakland Raiders

2. William Clay Ford, Detroit Lions

3. Dan Snyder, Washington Redskins

4. Mike Brown, Cincinnati Bengals

5. Denise DeBartolo York, San Francisco 49ers

MLB

Five Best

1. John Henry/Tom Werner/Larry Lucchino, Boston Red Sox

2. Arturo Moreno, Los Angeles Angels

3. William DeWitt, St. Louis Cardinals

4. Steinbrenner Family, New York Yankees

5. Stuart Sternberg, Tampa Bay Rays

Five Worst

1. Peter Angelos, Baltimore Orioles

2. Tom Hicks, Texas Rangers

3. David Glass, Kansas City Royals

4. Jeffrey Loria, Florida Marlins

5. Ted Lerner, Washington Nationals

NBA

Five Best

1. Jerry Buss, Los Angeles Lakers

2. Peter Holt, San Antonio Spurs

3. Mark Cuban, Dallas Mavericks

4. Les Alexander, Houston Rockets

5. Dan Gilbert, Cleveland Cavaliers

Five Worst

1. Donald T. Sterling, Los Angeles Clippers

2. Cablevision/James Dolan, New York Knicks

3. Michael Heisley, Memphis Grizzlies

4. Chris Cohan, Golden State Warriors

5. Robert Johnson/Michael Jordan, Charlotte Bobcats

NHL

Five Best

1. Mike Ilitch, Detroit Red Wings

2. Jeffrey Vanderbeek, New Jersey Devils

3. Mario Lemieux/Ron Burkle, Pittsburgh Penguins

4. San Jose Sports and Entertainment, San Jose Sharks

5. Peter Karmanos, Carolina Hurricanes

Five Worst

1. Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment, Toronto Maple Leafs

2. Alan Cohen, Florida Panthers

3. Charles Wang, New York Islanders

4. Atlanta Spirit, Atlanta Thrashers

5. Predator Holdings, LLC Nashville Predators

I feel bad for WC Ford; he tried so hard to be the worst owner in the NFL and still came up short.   :(
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Valmy on May 12, 2009, 03:21:46 PM
QuoteNFL

Five Worst

1. Al Davis, Oakland Raiders

2. William Clay Ford, Detroit Lions

3. Dan Snyder, Washington Redskins

MLB

Five Worst

1. Peter Angelos, Baltimore Orioles


I am so blessed.  :cry:

Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadImmortalMan on May 12, 2009, 04:04:49 PM
Is this currently worst, or historically worst? If the latter I'd like to nominate the Vikings for their 1337 trading skillz. And don't forget:

With the second pick in the 1984 NBA Draft, the Portland Trailblazers select: Sam Bowie!!    :P
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Savonarola on May 12, 2009, 04:15:05 PM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on May 12, 2009, 04:04:49 PM
Is this currently worst, or historically worst? If the latter I'd like to nominate the Vikings for their 1337 trading skillz. And don't forget:

With the second pick in the 1984 NBA Draft, the Portland Trailblazers select: Sam Bowie!!    :P

Current worst, I think.  All the owners listed are currently active.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: sbr on May 12, 2009, 04:20:18 PM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on May 12, 2009, 04:04:49 PM
Is this currently worst, or historically worst? If the latter I'd like to nominate the Vikings for their 1337 trading skillz. And don't forget:

With the second pick in the 1984 NBA Draft, the Portland Trailblazers select: Sam Bowie!!    :P
hey that pick was reasonable when it was made, it just turned out horribly.  :cry:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: citizen k on May 22, 2009, 01:44:27 AM
Quote
CANYON, Texas (AP)—Former NFL quarterback Ryan Leaf has been indicted by a Randall County grand jury on drug and burglary charges. The indictment handed up Wednesday in Canyon charged the 33-year-old former San Diego Chargers quarterback and former West Texas A&M quarterbacks coach with one count of burglary to a habitation, seven counts of obtaining a controlled substance by fraud and one count of delivery of a simulated controlled substance.
The indictment said Leaf presented an incomplete medical history to several physicians between January 2008 and September 2008 to get or try to obtain the painkiller Hydrocodone.
It was not clear whether Leaf had an attorney. Canyon police Lt. Dale Davis said Leaf is suspected of breaking into a Canyon apartment on Oct. 30 and stealing Hydrocodone, which had been prescribed to an injured football player. "There were signs of a forced entry," Davis said. "A window in the back of the home was (damaged)."
The count of delivery of a simulated controlled substance alleges Leaf gave an individual a substance he said was Hydrocodone but was not that drug.
James Farren, Randall County criminal district attorney, said Leaf has been undergoing drug rehabilitation in British Columbia, the Amarillo Globe-News reported.
Farren told the newspaper that efforts were under way to try to convince Leaf to return to the United States on his own.
"We have not found any evidence implicating anyone other than Mr. Leaf in this case ... but believe there's additional evidence implicating him in other events," Farren said. He would not elaborate.
Leaf, a Great Falls, Mont., native, led Washington State to the Pacific-10 Conference championship and Rose Bowl appearance. The Chargers made him the second pick of the 1998 NFL draft. He played for the Chargers from 1998-2000 and also played for the Dallas Cowboys in 2001. He threw for 3,666 yards and 14 touchdowns in his career.

Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Admiral Yi on May 22, 2009, 01:56:26 AM
Has the Michael Vick release already been mentioned?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: katmai on May 22, 2009, 02:00:54 AM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on May 22, 2009, 01:56:26 AM
Has the Michael Vick release already been mentioned?

Yes by you.


:P
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Admiral Yi on May 22, 2009, 02:02:53 AM
Quote from: katmai on May 22, 2009, 02:00:54 AM
Yes by you.


:P
:huh:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on June 12, 2009, 12:30:00 PM
The Falcons released Vick, I'm surprised they didn't do that already, it wasn't like anyone would trade anything for him.

http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/31314880/ns/sports-nfl/
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on June 17, 2009, 05:38:19 AM
Ohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohplease.

Reverend Ray Ray would show him the light.

QuoteThe Ravens have not contacted the Denver Broncos about disgruntled wide receiver Brandon Marshall, but they are doing their homework on the Pro Bowl playmaker, a team source said Tuesday.

It might take first- and third-round draft picks to acquire Marshall, one of the top young wide receivers in the game, but he would immediately shore up an area that is considered a weakness for the Ravens.

The Chicago Bears, who traded for Denver quarterback Jay Cutler this offseason, also might be interested in Marshall. It's not known whether the Broncos are considering trading Marshall, but they dealt Cutler when he asked them to.

Nicknamed "the Beast," Marshall has caught more than 100 passes each of the past two seasons. The major concern with Marshall is his lengthy list of off-the-field issues, which includes 13 police incidents since 2004 and a pending misdemeanor battery charge.

The Ravens had trade talks for the Arizona Cardinals' Anquan Boldin two months ago in an attempt to improve at wide receiver.

"We're interested in anybody that can help our team," coach John Harbaugh said Tuesday. "He [Marshall] plays for the Broncos, and he's under contract. He's not a guy that we're concerned with right now. We'll just have to see what happens."

Marshall requested a trade from the Broncos after skipping the team's mandatory minicamp last week. His holdout is the result of medical trust issues with the Broncos (he said the team misdiagnosed his hip injury last season) and a desire for a new contract.

Marshall's agent, Kennard McGuire, couldn't be reached for comment, but Marshall addressed his trade request on his Web site, writing: "To whom it may concern. Life is filled with change, and where I am in my life now change is probably best. It's hard leaving an organization ran by one of the best owners in all of sports, and someone who's been there for me through my ups and downs. The hardest thing was hearing Mr. B [Pat Bowlen] wish me luck in the future, but we both came to the conclusion that this is probably the best thing for me to grow on and off the field.

"I thank the Denver fans who embraced my emotion and play on the field and showing me love every time I step outside my door."

If traded, Marshall, whose contract expires after the season (unless the NFL goes into an uncapped season), would probably seek a deal averaging $9 million per season.

This could be a risky move based on Marshall's legal history, which includes charges ranging from domestic violence to driving under the influence to retail theft.

Marshall faces a trial later this summer on two misdemeanor battery charges stemming from an altercation with his former girlfriend.

"Their background matters," Harbaugh said. "We want to bring guys in here that are what we consider Ravens. So, any player that we bring in here, we've got to be convinced that he's a man of integrity, a high-character guy, and that our players can respect him in the locker room. That's going to be true whether it's in a draft or free agency or any guys we choose to re-sign. We look at that real hard because we think those are the type of people that you win with, and we're never going to compromise on that."

Another issue with Marshall is his health. He had hip surgery on March 31 and hopes to be ready by the start of training camp in late July.

But Marshall has been rehabilitating his hip at his Orlando, Fla., home because of his problems with the Broncos' medical staff.

On his Web site, Marshall wrote: "It's kind of funny now but some of my coaches thought I was getting 'big-headed' and just didn't want to practice but I needed some fine tuning.

"What made last year so weird was that I got two MRIs, one in camp and the second around week six and was told nothing was wrong but come to find out THERE WAS A BIT OF A PROBLEM after all," Marshall added. "LOL. I guess that's part of the business. So after all that, I'm now even more excited about playing this season at 100%. This year I can help my team more and hopefully we can get to the playoffs."

Still, this could be the Ravens' best chance at adding a big-play receiver. Marshall, 6 feet 4, 230 pounds, would appear to be a perfect fit for the Ravens, who could team him with strong-armed quarterback Joe Flacco for the next decade.

In his three-year career in Denver, Marshall has caught 226 passes for 2,899 yards and 15 touchdowns and built a reputation for breaking tackles for long gains.

There are question marks regarding the Ravens' receivers. The top three -- Derrick Mason (shoulder), Mark Clayton (foot) and Demetrius Williams (ankle) -- have missed significant time in offseason minicamps.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Sophie Scholl on June 17, 2009, 07:02:21 PM
Denver imploding. :cool:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on June 17, 2009, 07:18:04 PM
Quote from: Judas Iscariot on June 17, 2009, 07:02:21 PM
Denver imploding. :cool:
Indeed.  The one team who might be worse than the Jets will probably be the Broncos.

Hopefully the Ravens can profit from Denver's meltdown.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: PDH on June 17, 2009, 07:45:01 PM
Yeah, whoever gets Marshall gets 2-3 games before he slaps some tart and ends up with the rest of the year off to think about what he has done.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on June 17, 2009, 08:04:51 PM
Quote from: PDH on June 17, 2009, 07:45:01 PM
Yeah, whoever gets Marshall gets 2-3 games before he slaps some tart and ends up with the rest of the year off to think about what he has done.
Ray Lewis can straighten him out.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: katmai on June 18, 2009, 05:00:44 AM
Quote from: Judas Iscariot on June 17, 2009, 07:02:21 PM
Denver imploding. :cool:

That is actually what i've heard from one of their players this past week :lol:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Vince on June 18, 2009, 07:17:02 AM
Quote from: Neil on June 17, 2009, 07:18:04 PM
Quote from: Judas Iscariot on June 17, 2009, 07:02:21 PM
Denver imploding. :cool:
Indeed.  The one team who might be worse than the Jets will probably be the Broncos.

Hopefully the Ravens can profit from Denver's meltdown.

Pfft.  Rex Ryan will lead the Jets to a Super Bowl. 
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on June 18, 2009, 08:12:52 AM
Quote from: Vince on June 18, 2009, 07:17:02 AM
Quote from: Neil on June 17, 2009, 07:18:04 PM
Quote from: Judas Iscariot on June 17, 2009, 07:02:21 PM
Denver imploding. :cool:
Indeed.  The one team who might be worse than the Jets will probably be the Broncos.

Hopefully the Ravens can profit from Denver's meltdown.

Pfft.  Rex Ryan will lead the Jets to a Super Bowl.
Who's going to throw the ball?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: sbr on June 18, 2009, 05:37:01 PM
Quote from: Neil on June 18, 2009, 08:12:52 AM
Quote from: Vince on June 18, 2009, 07:17:02 AM
Quote from: Neil on June 17, 2009, 07:18:04 PM
Quote from: Judas Iscariot on June 17, 2009, 07:02:21 PM
Denver imploding. :cool:
Indeed.  The one team who might be worse than the Jets will probably be the Broncos.

Hopefully the Ravens can profit from Denver's meltdown.

Pfft.  Rex Ryan will lead the Jets to a Super Bowl.
Who's going to throw the ball?
Kellen Clemens

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi195.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fz133%2Fsbr32%2FRandom%2520forum%2520crap%2Fimages.jpg&hash=534092ae02c6e3239552a8997de915d3e0418fbf)
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on June 22, 2009, 04:55:55 AM
WTF

MIAMI - Former NFL quarterback Bernie Kosar has filed for bankruptcy protection in Miami.

Kosar's Chapter 11 filing Friday lists assets between $1 million and $10 million and liabilities of between $10 million and $50 million.

Kosar owes almost $1.5 million in "unsecured debt" to the Cleveland Browns, who he played for from 1985 to 1993. Kosar also owes his ex-wife Babette $3 million and $725,000 (from a personal loan) to the owner of the Cleveland Gladiators of the Arena Football League. He owes a bank more than $9 million for bad real estate deals.

The 45-year-old Kosar got divorced in 2007 and last year saw his steakhouse go out of business.

Kosar, who also played for Dallas and Miami, retired from the NFL in 1996.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on June 22, 2009, 08:14:55 AM
Well, it's pretty common for NFL players to have major financial problems after they retire.  Unless you're Dan Marino, the endorsements dry up.  It will be pretty unlikely for big QB stars going forward, simply because they can expect to earn over a hundred million dollars in salary and endorsements over their career, and white people have a hard time going through that kind of money.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Sophie Scholl on June 22, 2009, 07:43:28 PM
The way DHB is going, he might not even get signed.  He's spent almost all of the OTA period with various hamstring issues, and the few times he was on the field he looked like crap.  That would be icing on the damned cake to celebrate Raider incompetence.  The media would have a fething field day with it.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on June 22, 2009, 07:50:29 PM
Quote from: Judas Iscariot on June 22, 2009, 07:43:28 PM
The way DHB is going, he might not even get signed.  He's spent almost all of the OTA period with various hamstring issues, and the few times he was on the field he looked like crap.  That would be icing on the damned cake to celebrate Raider incompetence.  The media would have a fething field day with it.
To be fair, the media already had a field day on draft weekend.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Sophie Scholl on June 22, 2009, 07:56:45 PM
Quote from: Neil on June 22, 2009, 07:50:29 PM
To be fair, the media already had a field day on draft weekend.
True enough, but this would send them into a frothing frenzy.  Damned Raider haters. <_<  Of course, it might be the smart move.  If he can't hack it, it'll save having to pay out a first round salary and all the cap chaos that that causes.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on June 26, 2009, 07:04:01 PM
Almost there...almost there....

QuotePro Bowl linebacker Terrell Suggs said Friday that he is nearing a long-term deal with the Ravens, a contract that surprisingly won't make him the highest-paid defensive player in the NFL.

The league deadline to reach a new contract with players who have received the franchise tag is July 15. If no deal can be struck, Suggs would play under the franchise tag for a second straight season, earning $10.2 million this year.

"We are close to an agreement. We just have a few little things to work out," Suggs told The Baltimore Sun. "I don't want to go into great detail, but it's things like the years of the agreement and incentives, but the basic framework has been done."

Suggs, 26, is considered one of the rising defensive stars in the NFL. Some NFL observers have contended Suggs would test the free-agent market in March, when he would be one of the top players available.

But the Ravens' top pass rusher said Friday that he'd "be very surprised if this contract isn't done soon." He also denied rumors that this contract will make him one of the highest paid defensive players in the NFL.

"No, that's not true," he said. "But that's cool if people want to believe that. Being one of the highest paid players has never been my motivation. I just wanted to be paid what is fair, what I think I've earned."

A Ravens spokesman had no comment.

There has been speculation that Suggs is looking for a contract similar to the one given in 2007 to the Indianapolis Colts' Dwight Freeney, whose six-year, $72 million ($30 million guaranteed) made him the highest paid defender in league history at the time.

"I wish," Suggs said of getting a Freeney-type deal. "Again, I don't want to go into details but once it comes out I think everybody will be shocked, and they are going to say, what took so long to get this done?"

After being tagged last year, Suggs skipped all of training camp, missing 23 days of practice. He still made his third Pro Bowl last season, leading the Ravens with eight sacks and finishing third on the team with a career-best 102 tackles.

But Suggs said he wouldn't be the last one to arrive this year.

"I'll be there when camp opens," he said. "I'd like to be there because this is where the fans get robbed if a player doesn't report on time because it hurts his team."

Suggs said he has been cleared to practice at the start of training camp. His right shoulder -- which he injured in the AFC divisional playoff game at Tennessee -- is fully recovered.

"It took me longer to start training this off season because of the shoulder," he said, "but the shoulder is fine."
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Sophie Scholl on June 26, 2009, 08:35:36 PM
Here's to hoping it goes through.  Damned punks like Peppers make way too much money and upset the balance.  I like seeing guys like Nnamdi and Suggs make deserving bank though.  If it's going to be paid out those who deserve it should get it.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Savonarola on June 26, 2009, 09:00:04 PM
From prideofdetroit.com:

Quote•Thanks to a new lifting program, the Lions' upper-body strength is up 21%.  That's great to hear.

It is indeed, I expect the Lions to win 21% more games this year.   :)
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: JacobL on July 04, 2009, 03:36:35 PM
Per Rotoworld

   Steve McNair has been found dead due to a fatal gunshot wound to the head, according to Nashville police.

Newschannel Five in Tennessee has the news first. McNair was found in downtown Nashville. Police said it looked like a double homicide. A woman was also found dead on the premises. We'll update more news when we have it, but it's a heart-stopping tragic story on our nation's birthday. Our thoughts and wishes go out to McNair's family.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on July 04, 2009, 03:38:48 PM
Well, that sucks.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on July 04, 2009, 03:40:26 PM
Squee?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on July 04, 2009, 04:03:56 PM
Wow.  That sucks.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Vince on July 04, 2009, 04:47:40 PM
Jeez that sucks. 
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: citizen k on July 09, 2009, 05:48:10 PM
Some good NFL news:

http://www.krem.com/sharedcontent/northwest/sports/seahawks/stories/NW_070809WAB-mt-rainier-climb-summit-TP.1f6db1b3.html (http://www.krem.com/sharedcontent/northwest/sports/seahawks/stories/NW_070809WAB-mt-rainier-climb-summit-TP.1f6db1b3.html)
Mora, Goodell, Silvi reach Mount Rainier summit

09:13 PM PDT on Wednesday, July 8, 2009

KING5.com Staff and Associated Press



MOUNT RAINIER NATIONAL PARK, Wash. - A group including NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell and Seahawks coach Jim Mora reached the summit of Mount Rainier Wednesday.
A spokesman for United Way of King County says the team made it to the summit of the 14,411-foot volcano at 9:15 a.m. and was back at Camp Muir by about 2:30 p.m. The climb is a fundraiser for the Seattle charity.
The climb was led by Ed Viesturs, the only American climber to summit all fourteen 8,000-meter peaks without supplemntal oxygen, and Peter Whittaker, co-owner of Rainier Mountaineering Inc. and a mountain guide for more than 25 years.
Jered Erlandson says a guide called base camp to report that nearly everyone made it to the summit of Washington's highest peak. One person in the group sustained a minor injury Monday and didn't attempt the summit.
Also making the climb was KING 5 Sports Director Paul Silvi and KING 5 photojournalist Pete Cassam.
The climb has raised about $380,000.
The "Climb for the Community" is sponsored by the United Way of King County Response for Basic Needs. Please show your support for people in need by giving $5 and asking five friends to do the same. It's a small way to make a BIG impact in people's lives. Together, we can help keep people in their homes and food on the table during this difficult time. So give $5, $50 or $500. Any gift you give will make a difference. Please go to www.UWKC.org/climb.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Sophie Scholl on July 09, 2009, 06:31:19 PM
Should have tossed Goodell in. :menace:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: citizen k on July 09, 2009, 06:54:07 PM
Quote from: Judas Iscariot on July 09, 2009, 06:31:19 PM
Should have tossed Goodell in. :menace:

It still has its peak, for now.

Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Sophie Scholl on July 09, 2009, 07:05:13 PM
Quote from: citizen k on July 09, 2009, 06:54:07 PM
Quote from: Judas Iscariot on July 09, 2009, 06:31:19 PM
Should have tossed Goodell in. :menace:

It still has its peak, for now.
So chain him to the top to appease the football and volcano gods.  It's a win-win.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on July 13, 2009, 05:07:12 PM
Well, shit.

QuoteRavens receiver Mason retires from NFL
In the most surprising move of the Ravens' offseason, wide receiver Derrick Mason has abruptly announced his retirement.

"I have had a tremendous career and I played for two great teams. I had fun," Mason told jocklife.com, a Web site that shares an office building with Mason's agent. "In my career, I have been able to do everything but win a Super Bowl. I've had the opportunity to play on great teams and with great players. After 12 years, I have seen it all and done it all," Mason said. "Right now, I am content with the decision I am making. All good things come to an end, and I am ready to see what else life has to offer."

Mason's retirement comes nine days after quarterback Steve McNair, a longtime friend and teammate, was shot and killed in Nashville, Tenn.

"I have been thinking about this since the season ended," Mason said. "Emotionally I am just not that enthused. I have not been that enthused to get up and work out ... it was getting to that point. This decision has nothing to do with the contract situation; I have made enough money, more than enough money. Emotionally there are things that are more important. It's time right now. I don't know what's going to happen from here, but it's going to be really nice to see what life has in store for me. What I want people to remember about my NFL career is that I played hard ... played hard in practice and the game. I tried to make everyone better and would do anything to help."

The Ravens didn't immediately respond to a phone call from The Baltimore Sun. That leaves the Ravens with Mark Clayton and Demetrius Williams as their top wide receivers.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on July 13, 2009, 05:13:35 PM
Quote"I have been thinking about this since the season ended,"

That's good.  Glad you waited until 2 weeks before training camp opens to figure it all out.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: katmai on July 13, 2009, 05:15:12 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on July 13, 2009, 05:13:35 PM
Quote"I have been thinking about this since the season ended,"

That's good.  Glad you waited until 2 weeks before training camp opens to figure it all out.

I'm sure he was blackmailed by NFL to wait till now to mess with Ravens plans.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on July 13, 2009, 05:17:43 PM
Quote from: katmai on July 13, 2009, 05:15:12 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on July 13, 2009, 05:13:35 PM
Quote"I have been thinking about this since the season ended,"

That's good.  Glad you waited until 2 weeks before training camp opens to figure it all out.

I'm sure he was blackmailed by NFL to wait till now to mess with Ravens plans.

Yeah, he was blackmailed, alright.  Was it: impending drug test?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on July 13, 2009, 05:28:55 PM
Quote from: katmai on July 13, 2009, 05:15:12 PMI'm sure he was blackmailed by NFL to wait till now to mess with Ravens plans.

In all honesty, Steve McGSW's death was probably the final shot, and it went to his head.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on July 13, 2009, 05:51:18 PM
Ah fuck.  That's really terrible news for the team.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on July 13, 2009, 05:53:05 PM
Quote from: Neil on July 13, 2009, 05:51:18 PM
Ah fuck.  That's really terrible news for the team.

Yeah, puts them in one hell of a hole at WR, as well as Flacco's 2nd year development.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on July 13, 2009, 05:55:35 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on July 13, 2009, 05:07:12 PM
That leaves the Ravens with Mark Clayton and Demetrius Williams as their top wide receivers.

Wow.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on July 13, 2009, 05:56:59 PM
Fuck it, they may not have any choice but to make a play for Marshall now, even with the contract ending next season.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on July 13, 2009, 06:00:20 PM
Hey Plax is still available, right?  :P

Edit:  While they're at it, if they sign Burress, they might as well go after Matt Jones as well. 
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on July 13, 2009, 06:03:10 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on July 13, 2009, 05:53:05 PM
Quote from: Neil on July 13, 2009, 05:51:18 PM
Ah fuck.  That's really terrible news for the team.

Yeah, puts them in one hell of a hole at WR, as well as Flacco's 2nd year development.
Someone drive a dumptruck full of money up to Brandon Marshall's house, stat.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Sophie Scholl on July 13, 2009, 06:33:05 PM
 In response to the reports that WR Derrick Mason is retiring, here is a statement from the Ravens Senior Vice President of Public and Community Relations, Kevin Byrne: "For any player to retire, he has to send a letter to the NFL stating this. Derrick Mason has not done that."
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: sbr on July 13, 2009, 06:48:29 PM
Quote from: Judas Iscariot on July 13, 2009, 06:33:05 PM
In response to the reports that WR Derrick Mason is retiring, here is a statement from the Ravens Senior Vice President of Public and Community Relations, Kevin Byrne: "For any player to retire, he has to send a letter to the NFL stating this. Derrick Mason has not done that."
Sounds like someone grasping at straws.

Big blow to the Ravens though.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Sophie Scholl on July 13, 2009, 08:30:43 PM
Quote from: sbr on July 13, 2009, 06:48:29 PM
Quote from: Judas Iscariot on July 13, 2009, 06:33:05 PM
In response to the reports that WR Derrick Mason is retiring, here is a statement from the Ravens Senior Vice President of Public and Community Relations, Kevin Byrne: "For any player to retire, he has to send a letter to the NFL stating this. Derrick Mason has not done that."
Sounds like someone grasping at straws.

Big blow to the Ravens though.
From the Ravens' Facebook updates.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: sbr on July 13, 2009, 11:45:22 PM
Quote from: Judas Iscariot on July 13, 2009, 08:30:43 PM
Quote from: sbr on July 13, 2009, 06:48:29 PM
Quote from: Judas Iscariot on July 13, 2009, 06:33:05 PM
In response to the reports that WR Derrick Mason is retiring, here is a statement from the Ravens Senior Vice President of Public and Community Relations, Kevin Byrne: "For any player to retire, he has to send a letter to the NFL stating this. Derrick Mason has not done that."
Sounds like someone grasping at straws.

Big blow to the Ravens though.
From the Ravens' Facebook updates.

I wasn't doubting the validity of the statement, just saying that it was wishful thinking.  The formal letter to the NFL is the last step; it isn't likely to be sent the day the decision is made, doesn't mean the player has to keep playing.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Sophie Scholl on July 15, 2009, 02:21:50 PM
Suggs signs a 6-year deal. :)  No details yet on how much it's for.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on July 15, 2009, 02:50:29 PM
Quote from: Judas Iscariot on July 15, 2009, 02:21:50 PM
Suggs signs a 6-year deal. :)  No details yet on how much it's for.
Rumourmill says $63 million.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Alcibiades on July 15, 2009, 05:30:10 PM
Ouch.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on July 15, 2009, 08:28:34 PM
Quote from: Neil on July 15, 2009, 02:50:29 PM
Quote from: Judas Iscariot on July 15, 2009, 02:21:50 PM
Suggs signs a 6-year deal. :)  No details yet on how much it's for.
Rumourmill says $63 million.

QuoteRavens, Suggs reach six-year, $63M deal
Linebacker will receive $33 million in bonuses; Newsome: 'This is a good day for the Ravens franchise'


In signing Terrell Suggs to one of the most lucrative contracts -- six years, $63 million -- in NFL history Wednesday, the Ravens contend that it is more of an investment in the future than a reward for his first six seasons with the team.

His $33 million in bonus money tops all defensive players and ranks only behind Indianapolis Colts quarterback Peyton Manning, who received $34 million in bonuses.

Suggs' $38 million in guaranteed money exceeds the totals for Jared Allen ($31 million) and Dwight Freeney ($30 million), two pass rushers who have NFL sacks titles (something Suggs has yet to accomplish).


So, did the Ravens overpay Suggs?

"Just because you sign one of these mega deals, I think he understands it doesn't mean that you've arrived as a player," Ravens coach John Harbaugh said.

"And a lot of what we've done in signing 'Sizzle' to this, is we're anticipating the player he's going to be over the course of the next six years."

Making him the highest-paid linebacker in the league was probably the only way the Ravens could have locked up Suggs before Wednesday, the NFL deadline for teams to sign their franchise tag players to a new deal.

Suggs, 26, would have been among the top five free agents next offseason and would likely have received similar offers from other teams.

An emerging playmaker, Suggs went to his third Pro Bowl after leading the Ravens with eight sacks and returning two interceptions for touchdowns. He has recorded 53 career sacks, which is second-most in team history and ranks eighth in the NFL since 2003.

Suggs is also durable, never missing a game in his six-year career. In his 101st straight game (the longest current streak on the team), he sacked Pittsburgh's Ben Roethlisberger twice in the AFC championship game despite playing with a shoulder injury.

That's why the Ravens were willing to give him a $10.1 million signing bonus and a $23 million option bonus due in March. He is scheduled to make $40 million over the first two years of the deal.

"I'm just looking forward to showing them that they didn't make a mistake and that you've got the right guy," Suggs said. "I'm only 26 years of age, and my best years are ahead of me. I can only get smarter as my years of experience pile up."

The Ravens and Suggs have been negotiating a long-term deal since February 2008, the first time the team used the franchise tag on Suggs. The team put the tag on Suggs again earlier this year.

The sides made significant progress 2 1/2 weeks ago, when the Ravens increased the guaranteed money, a league source said. An agreement was reached around midnight Wednesday in a three-way call with Suggs, his agent and general manager Ozzie Newsome.

"This is a good day for the Ravens franchise," Newsome said.

If no deal had been struck on Wednesday, the sides would have had to wait until after the season to sign a deal and Suggs would have earned $10.2 million this year under the tag.

Throughout the past few weeks, Suggs had publicly expressed optimism that the deal would get done.

"I wasn't sure this deal was going to get done even though I kept saying it was close," he said. "I thought the chances were about 50-50, and I definitely didn't want to get franchised again.

He added, "I am glad it is over, and now we can get back to football. Getting this done took compromises on both ends. I wanted to stay in purple and black, the Ravens wanted to keep me in purple and black, and they stepped up and showed me that. This means a lot to me and my family. Now I can be a Raven for the better part of my career."

It was only a year ago when there was a little acrimony when the Ravens used the tag on Suggs.

The sides even settled on a new designation for the tag, "a hybrid defensive end-linebacker," before reaching arbitration. It allowed Suggs to get paid more than a franchise linebacker but less than a defensive end.

He then attended some meetings during offseason workouts and reported back to play in the final two preseason games, which gave him enough time to get ready for the regular-season opener.

Last season, Suggs led the Ravens in sacks for the third time in his career and finished third on the team with a career-best 102 tackles.

"I was already excited to start training camp, and now having Terrell there makes it that much better," Harbaugh said. "He's a foundation for our defense to stay at the highest level. Having him in training camp will take him to higher levels."

The Ravens have a history of locking up their first-round picks who live up to expectations. They have given sizable deals to Ray Lewis, Jonathan Ogden, Chris McAlister, Todd Heap and Ed Reed over the years.

That's why Suggs said he could never envision leaving the Ravens.

"Some people just fit the Raven identity, and I'm convinced that I'm one of them," Suggs said. "Some people, when they retire -- like Dick Butkus and Walter Payton, they'll always be Bears. Tom Brady will always be a Patriot. Ray Lewis, he'll always be a Raven. I think this has given me the opportunity to solidify that I will always be a Raven."
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadImmortalMan on July 16, 2009, 11:03:27 AM
I heard on the radio that Favre is practicing with a high school team in Miss and is stringing the Vikes along until training camp starts to decide if he's coming back yet again.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on July 16, 2009, 11:18:14 AM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on July 16, 2009, 11:03:27 AM
I heard on the radio that Favre is practicing with a high school team in Miss and is stringing the Vikes along until training camp starts to decide if he's coming back yet again.
The sports media is pretty tiresome, the way they allow themselves to be manipulated, year in and year out.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on July 16, 2009, 12:06:09 PM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on July 16, 2009, 11:03:27 AM
I heard on the radio that Favre is practicing with a high school team in Miss and is stringing the Vikes along until training camp starts to decide if he's coming back yet again.

It is good that HS kids are learning to intercept passes from an NFL QB.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on July 16, 2009, 12:27:06 PM
Quote from: Ed Anger on July 16, 2009, 12:06:09 PM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on July 16, 2009, 11:03:27 AM
I heard on the radio that Favre is practicing with a high school team in Miss and is stringing the Vikes along until training camp starts to decide if he's coming back yet again.

It is good that HS kids are learning to intercept passes from an NFL QB.
Gunslings.  The proper term for Favre passes is gunslings, especially when they are intercepted.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: sbr on July 16, 2009, 10:50:56 PM
Quote from: Neil on July 16, 2009, 12:27:06 PM
Quote from: Ed Anger on July 16, 2009, 12:06:09 PM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on July 16, 2009, 11:03:27 AM
I heard on the radio that Favre is practicing with a high school team in Miss and is stringing the Vikes along until training camp starts to decide if he's coming back yet again.

It is good that HS kids are learning to intercept passes from an NFL QB.
Gunslings.  The proper term for Favre passes is gunslings, especially when they are intercepted.
:lmfao:

Very true
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on July 19, 2009, 09:22:33 AM
Just noticed this, the Madden 10 ratings:

http://maddennfl.easports.com/cover.action

Tony Homo an 87? Fuck that shit.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on July 19, 2009, 09:28:04 AM
Quote from: Ed Anger on July 19, 2009, 09:22:33 AM
Tony Homo an 87? Fuck that shit.

No shit.  He should be a 92.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on July 19, 2009, 09:39:54 AM
Quote from: Ed Anger on July 19, 2009, 09:22:33 AM
Just noticed this, the Madden 10 ratings:

http://maddennfl.easports.com/cover.action

Tony Homo an 87? Fuck that shit.
They've included a new mechanic that makes him an 87 during most of the season, but a 57 during December and January and a 27 in 4th quarters/OT during that period.

I'm more annoyed by the love they're giving the Patriots, even though it was categorically proven that they suck last season.  And they rate the Cowboys higher than the Ravens, even though Baltimore handed Dallas the most humiliating defeat in the history of the team, in front of their fans, their all-time greats, and the world.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on July 19, 2009, 09:40:54 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on July 19, 2009, 09:28:04 AM
Quote from: Ed Anger on July 19, 2009, 09:22:33 AM
Tony Homo an 87? Fuck that shit.

No shit.  He should be a 92.
Well, he did break up with Jessica Simpson.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on July 19, 2009, 09:43:42 AM
Quote from: Neil on July 19, 2009, 09:40:54 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on July 19, 2009, 09:28:04 AM
Quote from: Ed Anger on July 19, 2009, 09:22:33 AM
Tony Homo an 87? Fuck that shit.

No shit.  He should be a 92.
Well, he did break up with Jessica Simpson.

I'd ding him a few extra points just for that. Because Ms. Simpson has a nice personality and huge knockers.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on July 19, 2009, 09:49:18 AM
Quote from: Ed Anger on July 19, 2009, 09:43:42 AM
Quote from: Neil on July 19, 2009, 09:40:54 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on July 19, 2009, 09:28:04 AM
Quote from: Ed Anger on July 19, 2009, 09:22:33 AM
Tony Homo an 87? Fuck that shit.

No shit.  He should be a 92.
Well, he did break up with Jessica Simpson.

I'd ding him a few extra points just for that. Because Ms. Simpson has a nice personality and huge knockers.
He can do better.  He's the QB of the Cowboys.

Besides, she's kind of spoiled.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on July 19, 2009, 12:48:10 PM
Quote from: Neil on July 19, 2009, 09:39:54 AM
Quote from: Ed Anger on July 19, 2009, 09:22:33 AM
Just noticed this, the Madden 10 ratings:

http://maddennfl.easports.com/cover.action

Tony Homo an 87? Fuck that shit.
They've included a new mechanic that makes him an 87 during most of the season, but a 57 during December and January and a 27 in 4th quarters/OT during that period.


:lol:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on July 19, 2009, 01:25:27 PM
Quote from: Neil on July 19, 2009, 09:39:54 AMAnd they rate the Cowboys higher than the Ravens, even though Baltimore handed Dallas the most humiliating defeat in the history of the team, in front of their fans, their all-time greats, and the world.

Goddamn, that was hilarious game.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on July 19, 2009, 01:59:18 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on July 19, 2009, 01:25:27 PM
Quote from: Neil on July 19, 2009, 09:39:54 AMAnd they rate the Cowboys higher than the Ravens, even though Baltimore handed Dallas the most humiliating defeat in the history of the team, in front of their fans, their all-time greats, and the world.

Goddamn, that was hilarious game.
They had it on the NFL network a couple of weeks ago.  It was just as sweet the second time around.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Sophie Scholl on July 19, 2009, 02:06:39 PM
Quote from: Ed Anger on July 19, 2009, 09:22:33 AM
Just noticed this, the Madden 10 ratings:

http://maddennfl.easports.com/cover.action

Tony Homo an 87? Fuck that shit.
:lol: Well, it's official.  The AFC West has apparently become such a joke they aren't even in Madden anymore.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on July 19, 2009, 03:26:21 PM
Sage has a 50 carrying rating.  :D
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on July 19, 2009, 03:38:22 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on July 19, 2009, 03:26:21 PM
Sage has a 50 carrying rating.  :D
But a 99 helicopter-in-midair-while-fumbling rating.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on July 19, 2009, 03:48:41 PM
Quote from: Neil on July 19, 2009, 03:38:22 PM
But a 99 helicopter-in-midair-while-fumbling rating.

Hey everyone's good at something.

Edit:  Except Ethan Albright, apparently.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Grey Fox on July 20, 2009, 09:28:01 AM
so how far are we from LFFL now?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on July 20, 2009, 06:07:45 PM
QuoteMcNair had alcohol in his system
Ex-Ravens QB had BAC twice legal limit for driving when he died


NASHVILLE, Tenn. - Authorities say former Ravens quarterback Steve McNair had a blood-alcohol level twice Tennessee's legal limit for driving when his girlfriend shot him to death.

Tennessee Assistant Medical Examiner Feng Li said Monday that a toxicology report showed a trace amount of marijuana in the body of Sahel Kazemi. Police say the 20-year-old Kazemi shot McNair July 4 in a Nashville condo before killing herself.

Police say McNair was likely asleep when he was shot twice in the head and twice in the chest.

Li said there was no way to tell from the report how long before McNair's death he had been drinking.

Kazemi was arrested for drunken driving in Nashville two days before the shooting. Police video of the arrest showed her telling the officer that she was high.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on July 20, 2009, 06:09:22 PM
Ah, nothing like hitting the bargin bins and flea markets right before training camp.  It's, like, as if fahdiz ran a pro team.

QuoteHackett, 3 other wide receivers to try out for Ravens
Club seeks depth at position after Mason's surprise retirement announcement


The Ravens made their first move since Derrick Mason's retirement announcement, inviting four mid-level wide receivers for a tryout on Friday.

While all the names can't be confirmed, it is believed that D.J. Hackett will be the most recognizable receiver at the workout.

Hackett, 28, was released by the Carolina Panthers after catching 13 passes for 181 yards and no touchdowns last season. The 6-foot-2, 208-pound receiver turned down a tryout with the Ravens earlier this offseason because he was dealing with his wife's pregnancy.

"D.J. just wants to play football," said Kevin Robinson, Hackett's agent. "He is certainly intrigued by the opportunity."

A Ravens official couldn't confirm any names or whether a workout had been scheduled.

The agents for receivers Amani Toomer and Justin McCareins said they wouldn't be at the workout. Other free-agent receivers available include: Drew Bennett, Darrell Jackson, Robert Ferguson, Koren Robinson and Ike Hilliard.

There has been speculation that Marvin Harrison, who is considered the top free-agent receiver left, might wait until the middle of training camp before making a decision.

The Ravens are looking to add some depth at wide receiver in the wake of Mason's unexpected retirement announcement. Mason, the Ravens' top receiver the past four seasons, is expected to meet this week with coach John Harbaugh, who returns from vacation in a couple of days.

Based on the fact that the Ravens aren't going after a big-name receiver, it appears that the team sees some hope in changing Mason's mind. Mason, who was limited this entire offseason while recovering from shoulder surgery, might have been sidelined for the first couple of weeks of training camp anyway.

So, the Ravens might be content on waiting through mid-August on Mason's final decision.

With Mason's uncertain status, the Ravens need to add a wide receiver with NFL experience. The Ravens' top four receivers are Mark Clayton, Demetrius Williams, Marcus Smith and Kelley Washington.

In his first three NFL seasons (all with the Seattle Seahawks), Hackett averaged 35 receptions and caught a total of nine touchdowns. He signed a two-year, $3.5 million contract with the Panthers in 2008 but was cut after recording career lows in receptions, yards and touchdowns.

Quarterbacks, rookies and select veterans report to Ravens training camp on Monday (July 27).
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: katmai on July 20, 2009, 08:09:55 PM
gf i'll make up league this week, for a draft around 21st of Aug
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on July 20, 2009, 08:11:07 PM
Hopefully they can talk Mason out of retirement.  Otherwise, somebody give Marvin Harrison a blank cheque.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on July 20, 2009, 08:15:28 PM
Quote from: katmai on July 20, 2009, 08:09:55 PM
gf i'll make up league this week, for a draft around 21st of Aug
I'll be there.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on July 20, 2009, 08:25:50 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on July 20, 2009, 08:15:28 PM
Quote from: katmai on July 20, 2009, 08:09:55 PM
gf i'll make up league this week, for a draft around 21st of Aug
I'll be there.
Tom Brady's going to get injured again.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on July 21, 2009, 07:18:15 AM
Quote from: Neil on July 20, 2009, 08:25:50 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on July 20, 2009, 08:15:28 PM
Quote from: katmai on July 20, 2009, 08:09:55 PM
gf i'll make up league this week, for a draft around 21st of Aug
I'll be there.
Tom Brady's going to get injured again.

I watch this once a week:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LuClWeD9ouI&feature=related

Just to fuel my rage.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: charliebear on July 23, 2009, 08:07:16 AM
We're #32!  Woo Hoo!   :punk:

http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/powerRankings?GT1=39002 (http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/powerRankings?GT1=39002)
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Grey Fox on July 23, 2009, 08:10:26 AM
Quote from: katmai on July 20, 2009, 08:09:55 PM
gf i'll make up league this week, for a draft around 21st of Aug

:yeah:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Valmy on July 23, 2009, 08:17:02 AM
Quote from: charliebear on July 23, 2009, 08:07:16 AM
We're #32!  Woo Hoo!   :punk:

http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/powerRankings?GT1=39002 (http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/powerRankings?GT1=39002)

The Redskins add a bunch of good players and they are only ranked #17 behind ten loss teams from last year?

Good they always do bad when the media crowns them pre-season champs.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on July 23, 2009, 08:56:49 AM
Quote from: Valmy on July 23, 2009, 08:17:02 AM
Quote from: charliebear on July 23, 2009, 08:07:16 AM
We're #32!  Woo Hoo!   :punk:

http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/powerRankings?GT1=39002 (http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/powerRankings?GT1=39002)

The Redskins add a bunch of good players and they are only ranked #17 behind ten loss teams from last year?

Good they always do bad when the media crowns them pre-season champs.
It's precamp.  Who cares where they have anybody?  Everything will change in the next six weeks.  The Steelers are going to have a hard time repeating when all the other women that Worthlessberger raped start coming out of the woodwork to get their cheques.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: ehrie on July 23, 2009, 09:30:56 AM
I'm in again this year. The Languish Cup shall be mine.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: JacobL on July 23, 2009, 04:10:45 PM
per PFT
QuoteAs expected, the 2010 NFL draft will get started on Friday Thursday night, and it will become a three-day affair.

The draft gets rolling with the first round on Thursday night, April 22, at 7:30 p.m. ET.

Rounds two and three will be held on Friday night, April 23, beginning at 6:30 p.m. ET.

And then they'll wrap it all up beginning at 10:00 a.m. ET on Saturday, April 24.

:bleeding: :Joos


And an espn link for good measure

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4351601
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on July 23, 2009, 04:14:37 PM
Quote from: charliebear on July 23, 2009, 08:07:16 AM
http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/powerRankings?GT1=39002 (http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/powerRankings?GT1=39002)

The Ravens, after appearing in the AFC Championship game, are ranked 12th, behind 4 other teams that, oh, didn't appear in the AFC Championship game.
Once again, the league and MSSM  conspire against Baltimore.  Typical.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Strix on July 23, 2009, 04:14:42 PM
Quote from: Neil on July 23, 2009, 08:56:49 AM
The Steelers are going to have a hard time repeating when all the other women that Worthlessberger raped start coming out of the woodwork to get their cheques.

Is the Raven's defense planning a press conference or something soon?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on July 23, 2009, 04:16:29 PM
Quote from: Strix on July 23, 2009, 04:14:42 PM
Is the Raven's defense planning a press conference or something soon?

Nah, they've raped Rapistburger before.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: derspiess on July 23, 2009, 04:19:01 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on July 23, 2009, 04:14:37 PM
Once again, the league and MSSM  conspire against Baltimore.  Typical.

Ah, it's that time of year again.  I was starting to miss the whining.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on July 23, 2009, 04:19:58 PM
Quote from: derspiess on July 23, 2009, 04:19:01 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on July 23, 2009, 04:14:37 PM
Once again, the league and MSSM  conspire against Baltimore.  Typical.

Ah, it's that time of year again.  I was starting to miss the whining.

Strap yourself in, baby.  I'm just getting warmed up.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on July 23, 2009, 06:36:42 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on July 23, 2009, 04:14:37 PM
Quote from: charliebear on July 23, 2009, 08:07:16 AM
http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/powerRankings?GT1=39002 (http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/powerRankings?GT1=39002)

The Ravens, after appearing in the AFC Championship game, are ranked 12th, behind 4 other teams that, oh, didn't appear in the AFC Championship game.
Once again, the league and MSSM  conspire against Baltimore.  Typical.
I assume that they're considering Mason retired.  If Mason goes and they don't sign a legitimate receiver, there's a legitimate knock on the team.  Unless the Ravens are going to start videotaping opposing players in the toilets, Patriots-style, they'll have a hard time making it to the Superbowl with Clayton and Williams.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on July 23, 2009, 06:53:08 PM
Quote from: Neil on July 23, 2009, 06:36:42 PMI assume that they're considering Mason retired.  If Mason goes and they don't sign a legitimate receiver, there's a legitimate knock on the team.  Unless the Ravens are going to start videotaping opposing players in the toilets, Patriots-style, they'll have a hard time making it to the Superbowl with Clayton and Williams.

He's been harping all year about extending his contract past this season, which they said they wouldn't talk about.
He had the most serious surgery of his career after last season.
One of his best friends blew his brains out, and ruined his summer.
Harbaugh's camp is not the Camp Cream Puff they were used to under Billick, and to be avoided at all costs.

He'll be in camp by the 3rd preseason game.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on July 23, 2009, 06:57:21 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on July 23, 2009, 06:53:08 PM
Quote from: Neil on July 23, 2009, 06:36:42 PMI assume that they're considering Mason retired.  If Mason goes and they don't sign a legitimate receiver, there's a legitimate knock on the team.  Unless the Ravens are going to start videotaping opposing players in the toilets, Patriots-style, they'll have a hard time making it to the Superbowl with Clayton and Williams.

He's been harping all year about extending his contract past this season, which they said they wouldn't talk about.
He had the most serious surgery of his career after last season.
One of his best friends blew his brains out, and ruined his summer.
Harbaugh's camp is not the Camp Cream Puff they were used to under Billick, and to be avoided at all costs.

He'll be in camp by the 3rd preseason game.
I hope so.  The fact that he hasn't filed any paperwork is promising.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on July 23, 2009, 07:01:43 PM
Quote from: Neil on July 23, 2009, 06:57:21 PM
I hope so.  The fact that he hasn't filed any paperwork is promising.


Personally, I think it was McNair's death that put that zap on his head.

QuoteOn Tuesday night, Harbaugh had a "man-to-man" talk with Mason at the receiver's house -- their first sitdown since Mason's retirement announcement on July 13 -- and they discussed everything from his family to the team to the death of Steve McNair.

Harbaugh told The Baltimore Sun that he couldn't put a percentage on the chances of Mason coming back.

"I don't have an opinion on whether he'll be back because I have no idea," Harbaugh said. "Nothing's changed and Derrick was very clear about that through our conversation.

"I'm hopeful that he'll be back because he's a good player. A Derrick Mason who is fully committed and focused on football makes us a better team."

Mason did not return phone calls from The Sun. His agent previously said the earliest Mason would speak to the media would be the end of the month.

Veteran players report to Ravens training camp Wednesday. The first full-team practice open to the public is July 31.

Asked whether the team has placed a timetable for Mason to make a final decision, Harbaugh said, "We're staying away from that now. That's between Derrick's agent and [general manager Ozzie Newsome]."

The Ravens are being very cautious not to pressure Mason. Because he probably would have been limited the first couple of weeks anyway (he is recovering from offseason shoulder surgery), the team could probably wait for Mason's decision until mid-August.

Team officials are likely taking this sensitive approach because they believe Mason's announcement was motivated by a personal situation. There had been speculation earlier that Mason, who is entering the final year of his contract, was trying to gain leverage for a new deal.

By the time Harbaugh had finished talking to Mason on Tuesday, he said it was clear that the receiver's announcement "wasn't a tactic of any kind."

"We love him and care about him," Harbaugh said. "I told him that we want him on our team but we respect his decision either way."
....
"I think Derrick will give us an honest decision," Harbaugh said. "If he comes back, it will be full-go, 100 percent. If he doesn't, it'll be full-go, 100 percent into the next phase of his life. He's kind of at a fork in the road and he wants to make the best possible decision."
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadImmortalMan on July 23, 2009, 07:41:26 PM
So, is one of the teams going to move to LA, or is that just a rumor?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on July 23, 2009, 07:51:29 PM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on July 23, 2009, 07:41:26 PM
So, is one of the teams going to move to LA, or is that just a rumor?

Rumor, just like every year.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: sbr on July 24, 2009, 12:35:07 AM
The Ravens are going to suck, and it won't be because of their receivers.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on July 24, 2009, 07:58:40 AM
2010 NFL Draft is gonna have some changes.

QuoteNFL shifts draft start to prime time
First round will take place on Thursday as event moves to three days


NEW YORK - The NFL is making its already popular draft even more television-friendly, moving the first round to Thursday night.

Next year's draft will switch from a two-day, weekend format to a three-day event with the opening round in prime time for the first time.

The NFL said Thursday that the first round will begin at 7:30 p.m. on April 22. The second and third rounds will open at 6:30 p.m. on Friday and the last four rounds will start Saturday morning.

The draft will continue to be televised by ESPN and NFL Network and held at Radio City Music Hall. It was a Saturday-Sunday event from 1995-2009.

Thursday is typically the most-watched night of television. A total of 39 million viewers watched the draft this year.

I don't like it.  No sir, not one bit.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on July 24, 2009, 08:03:35 AM
Aren't they still doing real TV around the end of April?  Does the NFL really want to put the draft on and watch it get stomped out by CSI, or whatever the fuck it is that people watch on Thursdays?

It's not like the draft is really compelling television anyways.  Fifteen minutes of talking head assholes talking about how the pretty-boy QB that didn't go in the Top 5 has really slipped (complete with footage of said pretty-boy bursting into tears), followed by five seconds of interesting developments, as the new player is announced.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Valmy on July 24, 2009, 08:11:06 AM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on July 23, 2009, 07:41:26 PM
So, is one of the teams going to move to LA, or is that just a rumor?

LA already has a professional football team.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Grey Fox on July 24, 2009, 08:11:48 AM
If they do like the NHL sure.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on July 24, 2009, 08:11:50 AM
There went my weekend long nap with that stupid draft change.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on July 24, 2009, 08:21:28 AM
Quote from: Valmy on July 24, 2009, 08:11:06 AM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on July 23, 2009, 07:41:26 PM
So, is one of the teams going to move to LA, or is that just a rumor?

LA already has a professional football team.
The Avengers don't count.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on July 24, 2009, 08:09:55 PM
QuoteRavens sign receiver Bennett to one-year deal
Team adds 30-year-old wide-out after trying out group of four


The void left by the sudden retirement of Ravens wide receiver Derrick Mason has been filled by another former Tennessee Titan.

The club announced a one-year deal with Drew Bennett after the 30-year-old veteran completed a tryout with three other receivers Friday morning and passed a physical later this afternoon.

"At this time of year, it's good to be able to pick up a player who has been very productive in the league, and that includes against our defense," Ravens general manager Ozzie Newsome said in a statement. "Drew has been very competitive against us. We obviously liked his workout today. We wanted to make sure he was healthy and that he still had the things we've seen against us and on film."

Prior to climbing into a car waiting to transport him from the team's training facility in Owings Mills to take his physical, Bennett -- who met with the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, the Atlanta Falcons, Cleveland Browns and Titans this offseason -- said he thought he did what was necessary in the workout.

"I'm used to it now," Bennett said. "[I've] been to a couple of these, but I thought it went well. I feel good, I feel healthy, I feel strong, all the corny stuff you're supposed to say when you have a workout. But I feel like I'm in good shape, and it went well. I caught the ball well, I feel comfortable."

Bennett beat out former Seattle Seahawk D.J. Hackett, former Detroit Lion Chris Hannon and rookie Justin Brown at Friday's workout.

Hackett, 28, who has caught 118 passes for 1,575 yards and nine touchdowns in five seasons, was thought to be Bennett's primary competitor. But Hackett sounded glum about his prospects after the workout.

"I'm going back home," he said. "The workout went good. Just running routes. Everything went fine."

The 6-foot-5, 196-pound Bennett joins Ernie Wheelwright as the tallest wide receiver on the Ravens' roster and provides the offense with a big red-zone target, something it has been lacking for years.

In eight years, Bennett has caught 307 passes for 4,412 yards and 28 touchdowns. He had his best season in 2004, when he registered 80 receptions for 1,247 yards and 11 touchdowns with the Titans.

But in his last two seasons – both with the St. Louis Rams – he caught a combined 34 passes for 379 yards and three touchdowns. Bennett broke a bone in his left foot in the season opener against the Philadelphia Eagles last September and missed the remainder of the season.

Bennett, who waived by the Rams two years into a six-year, $30 million deal, said the recovery process was lengthy, but insisted that the foot is completely healed.

"I thought it was going to be six to eight weeks, and really it was bothering me all the way up until February," he said. "It took a little while to get back into where I don't feel it at all. It's been probably three months now since I've had any problems with it or felt it at all."

Bennett's medical history did not seem to scare off the Ravens.

"Drew's situation is a lot like [tight end] L.J. Smith, who we added earlier this offseason," Newsome said. "Both are proven veterans coming off injuries, and they are looking for the opportunity to resurrect their careers."

Bennett could bolster a receiving corps gutted by Mason's decision to retire earlier this month. Without Mason who led the Ravens in receiving in three of the last four seasons, the offense is left with Mark Clayton, Demetrius Williams, Marcus Smith and Kelley Washington -- a foursome that combined for 55 receptions and four touchdowns last season.

Like many Ravens fans, Bennett said he is hoping that Mason changes his mind.

"D-Mase is still a good friend of mine, so I would love a chance -- especially coming to a team with new guys -- to be able to have somebody that you're comfortable with right off the bat," Bennett said. ... But I think D-Mase will find his way. He's always been very passionate, and I think if he's ready to take the next step in his life, then so be it. And if he's not, then he'll be back."

Note: With rookies reporting Monday to training camp, the Ravens have two unsigned draft picks, offensive tackle Michael Oher (first round) and defensive end-linebacker Paul Kruger (second round). It is believed that the Ravens are closer to signing Oher.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadImmortalMan on July 24, 2009, 08:12:32 PM
Hmmm. Let's just get somebody...tall.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: JacobL on July 26, 2009, 09:38:25 PM
QuoteThe Drew Bennett era in Baltimore ends
Posted by Mike Florio on July 26, 2009 10:12 PM ET
The Drew Bennett experiment in Baltimore has ended.

After a grand total of two days.

Bennett worked out for the team on Friday and signed a one-year deal.  General Manager Ozzie Newsome raved about Bennett.

And now Bennett is retiring.

The news first surfaced on the Twitter page of ESPN Future's Adam Schefter.

Bennett's agent is circulating a statement regarding the situation.  We've received a copy of it.

"After returning home from Baltimore this weekend, a previous knee injury flared up, making me realizing that I am unable to play another NFL season," Bennett said in the statement.  "Therefore, I have decided to retire from the National Football League.  I want to thank coach [John] Harbaugh, [offensive coordinator Cam] Cameron and Ozzie Newsome for offering me the opportunity to be a part of their outstanding organization, and apologize to them for this unfortunate situation.

"The Ravens are a first-class organization that I was truly excited to join.  After an offseason of workouts and rehab, I thought I was ready to play again, but it became apparent over this weekend that while my mind is willing, my body will not be able to make it through another NFL season.  I have been blessed to have the opportunity to play in the NFL for as long as I have, but it is time for me to move on to the next chapter in my life."

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/07/26/the-drew-bennett-era-in-baltimore-ends/
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: sbr on July 26, 2009, 09:46:37 PM
 :lol:

Next.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: sbr on July 26, 2009, 09:58:30 PM
In other shocking news Brett Favre has not decided if he wants t play football yet.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=txvikingsfavre&prov=st&type=lgns
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on July 26, 2009, 10:05:54 PM
I guess Harbaugh's camp is really intimidating.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Alcibiades on July 26, 2009, 10:06:15 PM
:lol:

Seriously, two days?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Alcibiades on July 26, 2009, 10:06:52 PM
Quote from: sbr on July 26, 2009, 09:58:30 PM
In other shocking news Brett Favre has not decided if he wants t play football yet.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=txvikingsfavre&prov=st&type=lgns

Gawd he is really milking it.   :rolleyes:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on July 26, 2009, 10:08:25 PM
Quote from: Alcibiades on July 26, 2009, 10:06:52 PM
Quote from: sbr on July 26, 2009, 09:58:30 PM
In other shocking news Brett Favre has not decided if he wants t play football yet.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=txvikingsfavre&prov=st&type=lgns

Gawd he is really milking it.   :rolleyes:
Favre has really devastated his legacy.  He went from being a good ole' boy who was gunslinging for love of the game, to a hard-bitten, calculating media-whore.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: sbr on July 26, 2009, 10:19:14 PM
Quote from: Neil on July 26, 2009, 10:08:25 PM
Quote from: Alcibiades on July 26, 2009, 10:06:52 PM
Quote from: sbr on July 26, 2009, 09:58:30 PM
In other shocking news Brett Favre has not decided if he wants t play football yet.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=txvikingsfavre&prov=st&type=lgns

Gawd he is really milking it.   :rolleyes:
Favre has really devastated his legacy.  He went from being a good ole' boy who was gunslinging for love of the game, to a hard-bitten, calculating media-whore.

It is too bad, for almost all of his career, up to just last year, he was one of the things to love about the NFL; you could he loved to play the game, he was a good ole boy, never missed a game, played the day after his father passed away and was one of, if not the best ever.  Now no matter how fair it is, he will always be seen as the guy who couldn't make a decision, or was an attention whore. 
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on July 26, 2009, 10:30:00 PM
Quote from: sbr on July 26, 2009, 10:19:14 PM
Quote from: Neil on July 26, 2009, 10:08:25 PM
Quote from: Alcibiades on July 26, 2009, 10:06:52 PM
Quote from: sbr on July 26, 2009, 09:58:30 PM
In other shocking news Brett Favre has not decided if he wants t play football yet.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=txvikingsfavre&prov=st&type=lgns

Gawd he is really milking it.   :rolleyes:
Favre has really devastated his legacy.  He went from being a good ole' boy who was gunslinging for love of the game, to a hard-bitten, calculating media-whore.

It is too bad, for almost all of his career, up to just last year, he was one of the things to love about the NFL; you could he loved to play the game, he was a good ole boy, never missed a game, played the day after his father passed away and was one of, if not the best ever.  Now no matter how fair it is, he will always be seen as the guy who couldn't make a decision, or was an attention whore.
Yeah.  I mean, the assholes in the media are fueling the whole thing, what with them running their mouths about how every game he plays could be his last in a particular stadium, or on Monday Night Football, or whatever, for the last three or four years.  I remember one December where the Packers got raped to death by Kyle Boller's Ravens on Monday Night Football, and Madden and Michaels wouldn't shut up about how it might be Favre's last Monday Night.  And they were still doing it this year.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on July 27, 2009, 03:53:35 AM
Quote from: Alcibiades on July 26, 2009, 10:06:15 PM
:lol:

Seriously, two days?

Guess the ibuprofen didn't work.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Grey Fox on July 27, 2009, 08:50:09 AM
Katmai, the week has passed.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on July 27, 2009, 08:54:49 AM
Quote from: Grey Fox on July 27, 2009, 08:50:09 AM
Katmai, the week has passed.
Guess what:  The season doesn't start for another five weeks.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Grey Fox on July 27, 2009, 08:55:58 AM
My point exactly.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on July 27, 2009, 03:06:52 PM
You know, I'm getting pretty tired of Roger Goodell.  He's shooting his mouth off about Michael Vick, who he's conditionally reinstated.  The guy was busted for dogfighting, which isn't a serious crime at all.  Don't be an ass.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: sbr on July 27, 2009, 05:01:51 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4359354 (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4359354)

QuoteNEW YORK -- Michael Vick is back in the NFL. Now all he needs is a team to play for.

Vick, free after serving 18 months in prison for running a dogfighting ring, was reinstated with conditions by NFL commissioner Roger Goodell on Monday. He could participate in regular-season games as early as October.

Vick can immediately take part in preseason practices, workouts and meetings and can play in the final two preseason games -- if he can find a team that will sign him. A number of teams have already said they would not.

Once the season begins, Vick may participate in all team activities except games, and Goodell said he would consider Vick for full reinstatement by Week 6 (Oct. 18-19) at the latest.

According to ESPN's Sal Paolantonio, a source close to Vick expressed "shock" over the severity of Vick's punishment and said Vick will reapply for full reinstatement as early as Week 1.

Goodell suspended Vick indefinitely in August 2007 after the former Atlanta Falcons quarterback admitted bankrolling a dogfighting operation on his property in Virginia. At the time, Goodell said Vick must show remorse before he would consider reinstating him.

"I accept that you are sincere when you say that you want to, and will, turn your life around, and that you intend to be a positive role model for others," Goodell said in his letter to Vick. "I am prepared to offer you that opportunity. Whether you succeed is entirely in your hands."

"Needless to say, your margin for error is extremely limited," the letter said. "I urge you to take full advantage of the resources available to support you and to dedicate yourself to rebuilding your life and your career. If you do this, the NFL will support you."

Vick, once the highest-paid player in the league, said he was grateful for a second chance.

"I would like to express my sincere gratitude and appreciation to commissioner Goodell for allowing me to be readmitted to the National Football League," Vick said in a statement released by his agent, Joel Segal. "I fully understand that playing football in the NFL is a privilege, not a right, and I am truly thankful for the opportunity I have been given.

"As you can imagine, the last two years have given me time to revaluate my life, mature as an individual and fully understand the terrible mistakes I have made in the past and what type of life I must lead moving forward."

The announcement came after a busy first week of freedom for Vick, who met with union leaders and Goodell on consecutive days last week. His 23-month federal sentence ended when an electronic monitor was removed from his ankle early on July 20 at his home in Hampton, Va.

He met with DeMaurice Smith, executive director of the NFL Players Association, last Tuesday and, on Wednesday, he sat down with Goodell at a security firm in Allendale, N.J.

Goodell suggested that preventing Vick from playing at the start of the regular season wasn't a punishment but an opportunity for the quarterback to gradually make a transition back into the league.

"I have thought about every alternative, but I think this gives him the best chance for success," Goodell said. "We are not looking for failure here. We are looking to see a young man succeed."

But Vick's issues are far from over and he needs a team to call his own. Already, the owners of the New York Giants and New York Jets said they have no interest in the 29-year-old quarterback, who was officially released by the Falcons last month.

Vick filed for bankruptcy protection last July, listing assets of about $16 million and debts of more than $20 million, and has a hearing about his plan to repay his creditors on Friday in Newport News, Va. That plan is built around his ability to make NFL-type money again.

He's unlikely to command anything close to the 10-year, $130 million contract he once had with the Falcons, or to get endorsement deals after the grisly details of his involvement in the dogfighting ring.

Vick finally pleaded guilty after his three co-defendants had already done so. They told of how Vick participated in the killing of dogs that didn't perform well in test fights by shooting, hanging, drowning or slamming them to the ground.

Vick's appearances at federal court in Richmond, Va., all came with large groups of protesters outside. Many were with PETA and held signs depicting photographs of Pit Bulls ravaged in dogfights and decrying the brutality in the gruesome details that emerged in the case.

A smaller group came to show support for Vick wearing jerseys with his No. 7.

Vick has already taken some steps to begin rebuilding his image and showing remorse.

He met with the president of the Humane Society of the United States while serving the first 18 months of his federal sentence in the prison at Leavenworth, Kan. He plans to work with HSUS in a program designed to steer inner city youth away from dogfighting. He was not permitted to work with the program while in custody.

"I know that he's thrilled, and I'm happy to have the process moving in the right direction," NFLPA executive director DeMaurice Smith said.

"It's been a long process," Segal added. "He's thrilled for the opportunity to resume his playing career. He understands he has a lot to prove."
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on July 27, 2009, 05:18:08 PM
Quote from: Neil on July 27, 2009, 03:06:52 PM
You know, I'm getting pretty tired of Roger Goodell.  He's shooting his mouth off about Michael Vick, who he's conditionally reinstated.  The guy was busted for dogfighting, which isn't a serious crime at all.  Don't be an ass.

Fuck Oogie.  Country ass nigger deserved more than what he got.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Sophie Scholl on July 27, 2009, 05:36:56 PM
Know what I'd love to see?  Favre dick around even longer, and then say he is ready to come back.  Which will then be promptly followed by the Vikings saying that they've moved on, but he's free to look elsewhere.  Fucker.  I hope he gets paralyzed if he plays.  He has so totally destroyed his legacy it's amazing.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: katmai on July 27, 2009, 07:20:55 PM
Sorry foxy, my pop is in town till tomorrow.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on July 27, 2009, 09:49:42 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on July 27, 2009, 05:18:08 PM
Quote from: Neil on July 27, 2009, 03:06:52 PM
You know, I'm getting pretty tired of Roger Goodell.  He's shooting his mouth off about Michael Vick, who he's conditionally reinstated.  The guy was busted for dogfighting, which isn't a serious crime at all.  Don't be an ass.

Fuck Oogie.  Country ass nigger deserved more than what he got.
For dogfighting?  Fuck off.  He deserved a slap on the wrist.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Alcibiades on July 27, 2009, 10:39:41 PM
Quote from: Neil on July 27, 2009, 09:49:42 PM
For dogfighting?  Fuck off.  He deserved a slap on the wrist.

You live in a country of savages.   ^_^
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on July 28, 2009, 04:00:05 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcxMsC3ny8g

Christ.

Edit:  NFL Network is showing that Fins - Jets game from 2000.  Heh heh.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Vince on July 28, 2009, 10:10:26 AM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on July 28, 2009, 04:00:05 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcxMsC3ny8g

Christ.

Edit:  NFL Network is showing that Fins - Jets game from 2000.  Heh heh.

The Monday Night Miracle.   ^_^

One of the few bright spots for NY in the Jets - Fins rivalry. 
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Valmy on July 28, 2009, 10:15:48 AM
Quote from: Vince on July 28, 2009, 10:10:26 AM
One of the few bright spots for NY in the Jets - Fins rivalry. 

I don't really recall that many great things happening for the Fins either since 1974.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on July 28, 2009, 05:24:15 PM
Favre has said that he's not coming back.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Barrister on July 28, 2009, 05:53:44 PM
Too bad - it would have been fun to have Favre wearing purple.

But I heard faint rumblings that the Vikings should now go after Vick.  No fucking way.  I'll take Sage or Tavaris over Vick any day.  It has nothing to do with dog-killing, but everything to do with being a shitty quarterback who'se been away from the game for 2 years.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on July 28, 2009, 05:55:16 PM
Quote from: Barrister on July 28, 2009, 05:53:44 PM
Too bad - it would have been fun to have Favre wearing purple.

But I heard faint rumblings that the Vikings should now go after Vick.  No fucking way.  I'll take Sage or Tavaris over Vick any day.  It has nothing to do with dog-killing, but everything to do with being a shitty quarterback who'se been away from the game for 2 years.
Besides, Tavaris is Vick, except not quite as nifty a runner.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on July 28, 2009, 07:56:18 PM
Quote from: Valmy on July 28, 2009, 10:15:48 AM
Quote from: Vince on July 28, 2009, 10:10:26 AM
One of the few bright spots for NY in the Jets - Fins rivalry. 

I don't really recall that many great things happening for the Fins either since 1974.

True dat, yo.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: sbr on July 28, 2009, 08:40:02 PM
Eagles Defensive Coordinator Jim Johnson has lost his battle with cancer.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slu...v=ap&type=lgns


QuoteEagles chairman Jeffrey Lurie praised Johnson for his leadership skills and the person he was.

"For 10 years, Jim Johnson was an exceptional coach for the Philadelphia Eagles, but more importantly, he was an outstanding human being," Lurie said. "As an integral part of the Eagles family, Jim epitomized the traits of what a great coach should be—a teacher, a leader, and a winner ... It was easy to feel close to him."
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: katmai on July 29, 2009, 02:26:00 AM
Grey Fox,

League has been created, all folks interested please pm me or post in this thread again and i'll send info to join...

so let's see if Foxy can defend his title the lucky little quacker.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Sophie Scholl on July 29, 2009, 02:26:49 AM
In.  Just need to think of a name...
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: katmai on July 29, 2009, 02:29:44 AM
Quote from: Judas Iscariot on July 29, 2009, 02:26:49 AM
In.  Just need to think of a name...
PM sent
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: katmai on July 29, 2009, 02:32:51 AM
Okay sent emails to all the managers from last year who i have addresses for as well.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Sophie Scholl on July 29, 2009, 02:46:43 AM
The L.A. Stallions are ready.  Let's just hope none of the players have handguns. ;)
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Liep on July 29, 2009, 04:35:32 AM
I seem to always forget my Yahoo ID.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Vince on July 29, 2009, 06:54:09 AM
I'm in. 
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Grey Fox on July 29, 2009, 07:30:27 AM
Quote from: katmai on July 29, 2009, 02:26:00 AM
Grey Fox,

League has been created, all folks interested please pm me or post in this thread again and i'll send info to join...

so let's see if Foxy can defend his title the lucky little quacker.

:yeah:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: ulmont on July 29, 2009, 08:01:47 AM
Quote from: katmai on July 29, 2009, 02:26:00 AM
League has been created, all folks interested please pm me or post in this thread again and i'll send info to join...

Sure, hook me up.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on July 29, 2009, 08:04:59 AM
After <number> years of disappointment, The BurgerMakers! will surely emerge victorious in this coming season.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: ehrie on July 29, 2009, 08:59:04 AM
I am: in. Same name as last year: Chewable Steriods
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Barrister on July 29, 2009, 09:28:16 AM
I will be in as well.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: katmai on July 29, 2009, 01:08:26 PM
Quote from: ehrie on July 29, 2009, 08:59:04 AM
I am: in. Same name as last year: Chewable Steriods

Must have been that name in other league, LFFL you were Extra Special Teams
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: frunk on July 29, 2009, 01:09:02 PM
I'm in.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on July 29, 2009, 05:38:04 PM
Any more room for me, bitches?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: JacobL on July 29, 2009, 05:46:45 PM
QuotePosted by ESPN.com's Pat Yasinskas

Remember those Creamsicle uniforms the Bucs used to wear? They're coming back this year. For one game anyway.

The Bucs just announced they're holding a Friday press conference to reveal they're going to break out their throwback uniforms for the Nov. 8 game against Green Bay.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on July 29, 2009, 05:50:17 PM
Quote from: JacobL on July 29, 2009, 05:46:45 PM
QuotePosted by ESPN.com's Pat Yasinskas

Remember those Creamsicle uniforms the Bucs used to wear? They're coming back this year. For one game anyway.

The Bucs just announced they're holding a Friday press conference to reveal they're going to break out their throwback uniforms for the Nov. 8 game against Green Bay.

Aw, hell.  Bay of Pigs, baby.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on July 29, 2009, 06:00:14 PM
Quote from: katmai on July 29, 2009, 02:26:00 AM
Grey Fox,

League has been created, all folks interested please pm me or post in this thread again and i'll send info to join...

so let's see if Foxy can defend his title the lucky little quacker.
I'm in!
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: ehrie on July 29, 2009, 06:08:10 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on July 29, 2009, 06:00:14 PM
Quote from: katmai on July 29, 2009, 02:26:00 AM
Grey Fox,

League has been created, all folks interested please pm me or post in this thread again and i'll send info to join...

so let's see if Foxy can defend his title the lucky little quacker.
I'm in!

Tainted.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: ehrie on July 29, 2009, 06:09:11 PM
Quote from: katmai on July 29, 2009, 01:08:26 PM
Quote from: ehrie on July 29, 2009, 08:59:04 AM
I am: in. Same name as last year: Chewable Steriods

Must have been that name in other league, LFFL you were Extra Special Teams

Ah yup you are right. My first go around in LFFL I was Chewable Steriods. Last year was EST. Going throwback this year.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: katmai on July 29, 2009, 07:07:08 PM
pm sent to seedy, timmay i sent email to address you had on record
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on July 29, 2009, 07:12:54 PM
Quote from: JacobL on July 29, 2009, 05:46:45 PM
QuotePosted by ESPN.com's Pat Yasinskas

Remember those Creamsicle uniforms the Bucs used to wear? They're coming back this year. For one game anyway.

The Bucs just announced they're holding a Friday press conference to reveal they're going to break out their throwback uniforms for the Nov. 8 game against Green Bay.
:lol:

Why would the Bucs want to remember the old days?  The oldtime Bucs are the only team that could give the 2000s Detroit Lions a run for their money in terms of being the worst team in history.  Especially given that the colours were ugly and their pirate was homoerotic.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on July 29, 2009, 07:41:48 PM
Quote from: katmai on July 29, 2009, 07:07:08 PM
pm sent to seedy, timmay i sent email to address you had on record

Awesome password.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: katmai on July 29, 2009, 07:45:29 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on July 29, 2009, 07:41:48 PM
Quote from: katmai on July 29, 2009, 07:07:08 PM
pm sent to seedy, timmay i sent email to address you had on record

Awesome password.

thanks,
love the team name.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Alcibiades on July 29, 2009, 07:48:56 PM
Invite plz
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on July 30, 2009, 05:40:47 AM
With the Ravens signing Oher yesterday, the Ratbirds, Steelheads and Jets are the only teams that have signed their entire rookie draft classes.

As for the rest of you, your favorite team sucks.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Vince on July 30, 2009, 07:36:34 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on July 30, 2009, 05:40:47 AM
With the Ravens signing Oher yesterday, the Ratbirds, Steelheads and Jets are the only teams that have signed their entire rookie draft classes.

As for the rest of you, your favorite team sucks.

I wouldn't consider that too big an accomplishment for NY considering their draft class was only three guys. 
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on July 30, 2009, 07:38:44 AM
Quote from: Vince on July 30, 2009, 07:36:34 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on July 30, 2009, 05:40:47 AM
With the Ravens signing Oher yesterday, the Ratbirds, Steelheads and Jets are the only teams that have signed their entire rookie draft classes.

As for the rest of you, your favorite team sucks.

I wouldn't consider that too big an accomplishment for NY considering their draft class was only three guys.
That, and one of them was a certain bust.  The media has tricked me into hating Sanchez, and so he will fail.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on July 30, 2009, 08:00:51 AM
I noticed on the interwebs that Troy Smith tossed a 99 yard TD pass in practice.

Fucker must have been having flashbacks back to Ohio State.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on July 30, 2009, 09:41:33 AM
Quote from: Ed Anger on July 30, 2009, 08:00:51 AM
I noticed on the interwebs that Troy Smith tossed a 99 yard TD pass in practice.

Fucker must have been having flashbacks back to Ohio State.
Hopefully the Ravens will have Troy practice hard so that they don't need to call a timeout everytime he steps onto the field.  It drove me crazy all last year.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on July 30, 2009, 10:35:56 AM
Quote from: katmai on July 29, 2009, 07:07:08 PM
pm sent to seedy, timmay i sent email to address you had on record

The Puerto Rican Ninjas ride again! :pirate
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Grey Fox on July 30, 2009, 10:48:12 AM
This is nice, especially for Timmy,  Stattracker will be free this year.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on July 30, 2009, 10:50:02 AM
Quote from: Grey Fox on July 30, 2009, 10:48:12 AM
This is nice, especially for Timmy,  Stattracker will be free this year.
Huzzah! :w00t:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Barrister on July 30, 2009, 10:50:48 AM
When is the draft?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Grey Fox on July 30, 2009, 10:53:35 AM
Never, so far it's set at Autopick Draft
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on July 30, 2009, 10:59:36 AM
Quote from: Neil on July 30, 2009, 09:41:33 AM
Quote from: Ed Anger on July 30, 2009, 08:00:51 AM
I noticed on the interwebs that Troy Smith tossed a 99 yard TD pass in practice.

Fucker must have been having flashbacks back to Ohio State.
Hopefully the Ravens will have Troy practice hard so that they don't need to call a timeout everytime he steps onto the field.  It drove me crazy all last year.

Now that everybody and their dead grandmother is going to be doing that stupid Wildcat shit, it shouldn't be as much of a problem.

Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Sophie Scholl on July 30, 2009, 04:52:00 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on July 30, 2009, 05:40:47 AM
With the Ravens signing Oher yesterday, the Ratbirds, Steelheads and Jets are the only teams that have signed their entire rookie draft classes.

As for the rest of you, your favorite team sucks.

I hoping the Raiders waive DHB.  Bitch thinks he deserves a big pay day.  He spent almost all of the workout days sitting in the trainer's room nursing hamstring injuries.  Hey pal, all you have going for you is speed, if you can't run you're fucking useless.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on July 30, 2009, 05:08:26 PM
Quote from: Judas Iscariot on July 30, 2009, 04:52:00 PM
I hoping the Raiders waive DHB.  Bitch thinks he deserves a big pay day.  He spent almost all of the workout days sitting in the trainer's room nursing hamstring injuries.  Hey pal, all you have going for you is speed, if you can't run you're fucking useless.

Any idea how much they signed him for?  I haven't seen any numbers yet.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on July 30, 2009, 05:12:29 PM
Quote from: Grey Fox on July 30, 2009, 10:48:12 AM
This is nice, especially for Timmy,  Stattracker will be free this year.
I wonder why?  Yahoo never does anything out of kindness.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Vince on July 30, 2009, 05:24:33 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on July 30, 2009, 05:08:26 PM
Quote from: Judas Iscariot on July 30, 2009, 04:52:00 PM
I hoping the Raiders waive DHB.  Bitch thinks he deserves a big pay day.  He spent almost all of the workout days sitting in the trainer's room nursing hamstring injuries.  Hey pal, all you have going for you is speed, if you can't run you're fucking useless.

Any idea how much they signed him for?  I haven't seen any numbers yet.

AP reports 5 years/38 mill.  23.5 guaranteed. 
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on July 30, 2009, 05:28:28 PM
Quote from: Vince on July 30, 2009, 05:24:33 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on July 30, 2009, 05:08:26 PM
Quote from: Judas Iscariot on July 30, 2009, 04:52:00 PM
I hoping the Raiders waive DHB.  Bitch thinks he deserves a big pay day.  He spent almost all of the workout days sitting in the trainer's room nursing hamstring injuries.  Hey pal, all you have going for you is speed, if you can't run you're fucking useless.

Any idea how much they signed him for?  I haven't seen any numbers yet.

AP reports 5 years/38 mill.  23.5 guaranteed.
:lol:

23.5 million for a guy who probably won't make the team?  As much as I want the Raiders to shape up and bring justice to the Broncos and Chargers, they keep doing stupid shit like this.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on July 30, 2009, 05:38:07 PM
Quote from: Vince on July 30, 2009, 05:24:33 PM
AP reports 5 years/38 mill.  23.5 guaranteed.

:blink:

Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: sbr on July 30, 2009, 05:46:38 PM
Quote from: Neil on July 30, 2009, 05:12:29 PM
Quote from: Grey Fox on July 30, 2009, 10:48:12 AM
This is nice, especially for Timmy,  Stattracker will be free this year.
I wonder why?  Yahoo never does anything out of kindness.

Probably because ESPN has given out free stat tracking for years, I would imagine Yahoo! is losing customers to ESPN.  I know that is why the 2 fantasy baseball league I am in moved to ESPN this year.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Vince on July 30, 2009, 05:49:20 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on July 30, 2009, 05:38:07 PM
Quote from: Vince on July 30, 2009, 05:24:33 PM
AP reports 5 years/38 mill.  23.5 guaranteed.

:blink:

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gawowDLv1HHPEJnMp5u1zsDFS5LwD99P1MAG1 (http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gawowDLv1HHPEJnMp5u1zsDFS5LwD99P1MAG1)

It's a nice payday for a guy that can run fast in no pads at the combine.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Sophie Scholl on July 30, 2009, 05:51:31 PM
 :blink: :bleeding:
"Sports agent Alvin Keels tweeted the deal had $23.5 million guaranteed and $38.25 million in base salary with a maximum value of $54 million, according to his league source."
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on July 30, 2009, 06:34:31 PM
Quote from: Vince on July 30, 2009, 05:24:33 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on July 30, 2009, 05:08:26 PM
Quote from: Judas Iscariot on July 30, 2009, 04:52:00 PM
I hoping the Raiders waive DHB.  Bitch thinks he deserves a big pay day.  He spent almost all of the workout days sitting in the trainer's room nursing hamstring injuries.  Hey pal, all you have going for you is speed, if you can't run you're fucking useless.

Any idea how much they signed him for?  I haven't seen any numbers yet.

AP reports 5 years/38 mill.  23.5 guaranteed.
Wow that's insane
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on July 31, 2009, 05:47:05 PM
Got a $5 bet with a coworker over who signs Vick;  I say the Raidahs, he says the Cowboys.  Any other possibilities out there, you think?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on July 31, 2009, 05:52:20 PM
Supposedly the bungles were mildly interested, but with Carson looking out for his kid brother, I doubt there is really a spot for him.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Barrister on July 31, 2009, 05:53:41 PM
I can't see either.

The Raidahs may love taking in rejects, but they haven't given up on Russell yet.  The Cowboys haven't given up on Romo either.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on July 31, 2009, 06:22:22 PM
Quote from: Barrister on July 31, 2009, 05:53:41 PM
I can't see either.

The Raidahs may love taking in rejects, but they haven't given up on Russell yet.  The Cowboys haven't given up on Romo either.
Even if they do give up on Russell, didn't they sign Jeff Garcia?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Barrister on July 31, 2009, 06:31:10 PM
Quote from: Neil on July 31, 2009, 06:22:22 PM
Quote from: Barrister on July 31, 2009, 05:53:41 PM
I can't see either.

The Raidahs may love taking in rejects, but they haven't given up on Russell yet.  The Cowboys haven't given up on Romo either.
Even if they do give up on Russell, didn't they sign Jeff Garcia?

Did they?

Poor Jeff...  :(
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on July 31, 2009, 06:32:25 PM
The Raiders need Jeff George.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: sbr on July 31, 2009, 06:33:35 PM
The Patriots wouldn't shock me; Belichek loves versatile players and they have strong enough leadership to keep Vick from getting sideways at all.  They are one of the few teams to still be considering him.  I also think they like to take on "troubled" players and turn them around; see Dillon, Cory and Moss, Randy.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on July 31, 2009, 06:34:46 PM
Hopefully, the pats will sign vick, and his new batch of dogs will maul Brady.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Barrister on July 31, 2009, 06:36:57 PM
googling "michael vick team rumors" the two that get mentioned on the first page were Seattle and New England.

Both make more sense than the Raiders or Cowgirls.  A team with a strong #1 who wouldn't be threatened, but be willing to gamble on a troubled #2 or #3.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on July 31, 2009, 06:49:24 PM
Quote from: Barrister on July 31, 2009, 06:31:10 PM
Quote from: Neil on July 31, 2009, 06:22:22 PM
Quote from: Barrister on July 31, 2009, 05:53:41 PM
I can't see either.

The Raidahs may love taking in rejects, but they haven't given up on Russell yet.  The Cowboys haven't given up on Romo either.
Even if they do give up on Russell, didn't they sign Jeff Garcia?
Did they?

Poor Jeff...  :(
If anyone can return the Raiders to relevance, it's Garcia.  Really, it's offensive stability that they need.  Their D isn't terrible, but the awesomeness and will to win of Garcia might pay dividends.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on July 31, 2009, 06:50:55 PM
Quote from: sbr on July 31, 2009, 06:33:35 PM
The Patriots wouldn't shock me; Belichek loves versatile players and they have strong enough leadership to keep Vick from getting sideways at all.  They are one of the few teams to still be considering him.  I also think they like to take on "troubled" players and turn them around; see Dillon, Cory and Moss, Randy.
Why would Vick play in New England?  They wouldn't pay him what a shittier team would, and he'd have to live in the most racist part of the US six months out of the year, which wouldn't be good for his recovery.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: sbr on July 31, 2009, 07:01:39 PM
Quote from: Neil on July 31, 2009, 06:50:55 PM
Quote from: sbr on July 31, 2009, 06:33:35 PM
The Patriots wouldn't shock me; Belichek loves versatile players and they have strong enough leadership to keep Vick from getting sideways at all.  They are one of the few teams to still be considering him.  I also think they like to take on "troubled" players and turn them around; see Dillon, Cory and Moss, Randy.
Why would Vick play in New England?  They wouldn't pay him what a shittier team would, and he'd have to live in the most racist part of the US six months out of the year, which wouldn't be good for his recovery.

He may not have the luxury of being choosy; he may also see being a part of a winning team and appearing to be a good citizen as more important in the short term than money or a bigger role on a losing team.  In "on-the-field" football terms it would be the best thing for Vick, IMO.  I have no idea what exactly he is looking for, or how many offers he may get.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on August 01, 2009, 02:38:44 AM
Training camp! ^_^

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.texansbullpen.com%2F09photogallery%2FPreseason%2F2009-07-31-TrainingCamp%2FPhotos%2FDSC_0155.JPG&hash=7efbfbdb9e38e1a8711f92ad8f6c252fab284a4c)

55 looks like he might be fucking up there.

Oh and the first bootleg of the Texans training camp: 

http://www.texansbullpen.com/09photogallery/Preseason/2009-07-31-TrainingCamp/Photos/DSC_0148.JPG

Ended like this, which probably would have been fatal for Schaub if they were on different teams or something: http://www.texansbullpen.com/09photogallery/Preseason/2009-07-31-TrainingCamp/Photos/DSC_0151.JPG
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 01, 2009, 06:33:29 AM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on August 01, 2009, 02:38:44 AM
55 looks like he might be fucking up there.
Looks like he's holding him, in order to make up for getting beat bad.  That's a good time to hold.

Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on August 01, 2009, 07:13:08 AM
Quote from: Neil on August 01, 2009, 06:33:29 AM
Looks like he's holding him, in order to make up for getting beat bad.  That's a good time to hold.

Day 1 of Training Camp:  Chris Myers continues to suck.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on August 01, 2009, 08:11:06 AM
Once again, it's the Summer of Ray.

QuoteWhile many questions remain after the Ravens' first full-team practice of training camp, one was answered resoundingly Friday: Fans still have a love affair with No. 52.

Ray Lewis rankled some of his most ardent supporters five months ago when he didn't make it clear during free agency that he wanted to return to the Ravens. But a fervent announced crowd of 11,078 welcomed the middle linebacker with open arms at McDaniel College.

When Lewis stepped onto the field to start his 14th training camp, fans shrieked and started chanting his name. One woman asked for a kiss and he obliged with a peck on the cheek. In the crowd, Lewis' jersey was the most popular. Down the street at Harry's Main Street Grille, someone carried a sign that read: "Ray-vens."

"I don't want to ever go anywhere," said Lewis, who re-signed for $44.5 million over seven years (essentially $22 million over three seasons). "I'm bred here, and I'm going to end my career here. [Signing elsewhere] is just not worth what's invested in my city, what I give back to my city and what my city gives back to me. There's no greater reward than that. I love Baltimore."

This is Lewis' town. And this remains Lewis' defense and team.

At 34, he is the oldest player on the Ravens. But his teammates contend that only makes him wiser.

The 10-time Pro Bowl linebacker is still the unequivocal leader.

"He's like King Leonidas; he's been out there and fought the war," said Tavares Gooden, who will start beside Lewis for the first time this season. "He just doesn't do it one time. He doesn't play hard for one week. He does it all the time. So, you can't question him. That's when you say, 'Let me follow him because I want to be great.' "

This year, the Ravens will have to hustle to follow Lewis. After bulking up to 260 pounds last season (to help him provide more of a punch on tackles), he has slimmed down 15 pounds after talking to new linebackers coach Vic Fangio.

With a four-man rotation ( Haloti Ngata, Kelly Gregg, Justin Bannan and Brandon McKinney) clogging up the middle, Lewis wanted to be fast enough to meet running backs at the hole.

"Ray is like the Michael Jordan on this team," free safety Ed Reed said. "His work ethic is totally off the charts. His intensity and his character and what he knows about the game is what makes you want to get better. Ray is just that father on the field that's getting guys lined up and they can learn to play the game by just watching them."

There has been some concern about how the departure of coordinator Rex Ryan will affect the defense. But the Lewis Factor has been in effect for the past decade.

Under three coordinators (Marvin Lewis to Mike Nolan to Ryan), the Ravens' defense has finished sixth or better for nine of the past 10 seasons. The common thread on the field has been Lewis.

"If it's anybody's defense, it's Ray's defense," coach John Harbaugh said. "Obviously, a great tradition has been built here, and you've got to say that he's been what it's been built around."

Lewis' excellence is matched only by his longevity.

He has already played more seasons than the other great linebackers in NFL history - Dick Butkus (nine seasons), Jack Lambert (11) and Mike Singletary (12). With the Ravens, Lewis is the only player remaining from the team that won the 2001 Super Bowl and represents the last link to the inaugural 1996 season.

"Many times when guys get older, they really lose their passion for the game before they lose their physical abilities," Fangio said. "But football is in [Lewis'] blood. I think he'll be one of those guys that we'll have to kick out of here rather than retire on his own."

There seemed to be a chance that Lewis might exit Baltimore over the offseason.

A few days before the Pro Bowl, Lewis acknowledged in an interview with the NFL Network that he would be interested in both the Dallas Cowboys and the New York Jets. Then, leading up to the start of free agency, Cowboys linebacker DeMarcus Ware said Lewis told him it was his "dream" to play in Dallas.

Asked about his "flirtations" with other teams, Lewis said with a laugh: "I flirt when I pass by a beautiful woman walking down the street. That doesn't mean I talk to her."

Now, Lewis is back with the Ravens, where he wants to reward the cheers with another championship.

"Making plays for me is the easiest thing I can do. Influencing men is what my challenge is every day," Lewis said. "When you ask me if I'm good, I'm only better because what's around me is better. Every year, they said, 'Your defense is getting old.' But it's hard to be old when you're always No. 1 or No. 2. Those things will energize me day in and day out to come back and always be a better leader."
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 01, 2009, 08:25:39 AM
I wonder if Tavares Gooden knows who Leonidas actually is, or if he just thinks that he was some guy that kicked a negro down a well.

Also, they forgot L.T.s 13 seasons on their list of all-time greats that Ray has outlasted.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on August 01, 2009, 09:11:47 AM
hy Neil, Mike Oher's first practice was yesterday.  All signs point to: beast.

QuoteOne of the first things you notice about Michael Oher is his explosion. When he comes off the snap of the ball, he can get an opponent's attention quickly. Upon first contact, he can make heads turn, which he did Friday in his first full practice as a Raven.

"Strong. Just so strong - as in really strong," Ravens outside linebacker Terrell Suggs said of Oher, the former University of Mississippi offensive tackle and the Ravens' top draft pick in April.

There were many other compliments.

"If that man keeps working, he is going to be an absolute beast," said Ravens defensive tackle Justin Bannan, who butted heads with Oher several times Friday.

It was a solid debut for Oher at the practice fields on the McDaniel College campus. Oher had missed the first three days because of a contract holdout, but on Day 4, he started making a name for himself.

Oher, the No. 23 overall pick in the first round, will wear No. 74. You can see what the Ravens liked in him and why they might pay Oher as much as $13.8 million over the next five years.

At 6 feet 4 and 310 pounds, Oher is built like two brick houses. Usually, when offensive tackles come out of college, they have a frame like a power forward or have too much baby fat.

Oher is a tweener, and this big man can run.

"He is in really good shape, really good condition," Ravens offensive line coach John Matsko said. "The offseason program really helped him, and he did a really good job on his running test."

It wasn't so easy with some of the other tests on the field. If you're a rookie offensive lineman, you don't want to have your NFL baptism against a team that has as much depth on the defensive line as the Ravens.

During a two-hour morning practice, Oher had to go against Trevor Pryce, Bannan and Brandon McKinney. On passing downs, he had to battle Suggs or Pryce. And this wasn't an offseason minicamp.

"It was full throttle, full speed, and this is what it's all about," Oher said. "I wasn't nervous. I was ready to practice. I did some positive things, and some things that weren't so good. But I have to stay positive and stay focused because I can get a lot better."

Agreed.

The athleticism in Oher is clearly evident. There are times when he can overpower an opponent on a running play, as he did against tackle Dwan Edwards. There were two occasions when he double-teamed with left tackle Jared Gaither on an unbalanced line, and they just blew defensive linemen away.

But Oher has a lot of work to do, especially in pass protection. He has a tendency to stand too high and get overextended. He is still confused about the playbook and appears to step to his left when he should step to his right and step to his right when he should step to the left.

But that passion, brute strength and athleticism is always on display.

"I got to keep working on the fundamentals of the game," Oher said. "I like Coach Matsko. He wants you to be hard-working, and he wants you to be physical and nasty. He wants you to step on peoples' throats."

You have to love that mentality. But football isn't all physical, especially for offensive linemen. It's also a thinking man's game, and Matsko says Oher is picking up the offense quickly.

"He has some work to do, like they all do," Matsko said. "When you're first starting out, you are nowhere near where you want to be. You just keep working, and each time you put your hand in the ground, you have to do better than the last time.

"Michael is very willing, and has a big, big heart with great determination. He's a lot of fun to be around, is very bright and has great retention."

All signs point to Oher's becoming a good offensive lineman. The Ravens might have gotten a glimpse of his future Friday.

"He probably was a little nervous, but he had a good first day," Bannan said. "He is athletic and really quick. When you're a rookie, you need to be like a sponge and soak everything up, and then apply it. But I ain't telling him a thing. I don't want him getting the upper hand on me. Eventually, he is going to be a beast out there."
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on August 01, 2009, 09:16:41 AM
I'm sure the Bungles first round pick is too busy consuming the contents of an entire Gold Star chili franchise.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 01, 2009, 09:58:54 AM
Excellent.  The stout Ravens line of last year will hopefully be even better.  Recent Ravens line picks (Grubbs, Yanda, Chester and Gaither on the offence, Ngata on the defence) have been  pretty damn good, so there's no reason to expect Oher to be anything short of great.  A line like Gaither, Grubbs, Birk, Yanda/Chester, Oher means serious business.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on August 01, 2009, 10:03:25 AM
You forgot that Buddy Lee himself, Kelly Gregg, is back and 100% healthy.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 01, 2009, 10:15:49 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on August 01, 2009, 10:03:25 AM
You forgot that Buddy Lee himself, Kelly Gregg, is back and 100% healthy.
It's a good D-line too.  Ngata, Gregg and Pryce, plus Edwards, Bannan and McKinney.  The only place where the Ravens D isn't marquee is at cornerback.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: sbr on August 01, 2009, 10:18:58 AM
Quote from: Neil on August 01, 2009, 06:33:29 AM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on August 01, 2009, 02:38:44 AM
55 looks like he might be fucking up there.
Looks like he's holding him, in order to make up for getting beat bad.  That's a good time to hold.

Yes indeed, a hold is much better than a sack.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: sbr on August 01, 2009, 03:56:30 PM
Derek Mason has returned from his sabbatical, should be at practice tomorrow.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=ap-ravens-masonreturns&prov=ap&type=lgns
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on August 01, 2009, 06:01:31 PM
Whew.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on August 01, 2009, 06:28:10 PM
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.texansbullpen.com%2F09photogallery%2FPreseason%2F2009-08-01-TrainingCamp%2FPhotos%2FDSC_0154.JPG&hash=a4d2c12f27bea26cd22271b07e9d22f36220dfd8)

:lol:  Nice catch by the dude who takes all these photos.

Edit:  Hey they signed Cushing today too.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 02, 2009, 11:01:36 AM
Quote from: sbr on August 01, 2009, 03:56:30 PM
Derek Mason has returned from his sabbatical, should be at practice tomorrow.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=ap-ravens-masonreturns&prov=ap&type=lgns
Even earlier than expected.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 02, 2009, 11:03:36 AM
Vince Young Texans jersey?  That's just weird.  And he's a divisional opponent, to boot.

College football fans are weird.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: citizen k on August 02, 2009, 07:33:07 PM
A$$hole.

QuoteCurry missing on second day of Seahawks' camp

By GREGG BELL
AP SPORTS WRITER

RENTON, Wash. -- Seahawks top draft choice Aaron Curry remains unsigned and absent on the second day of Seattle's training camp.

Seattle finished the first of two practices Saturday without the No. 4 overall pick.

The Seahawks are counting on Curry to start at outside linebacker.

The team and Curry's representatives continue to negotiate in what Seahawks general manager Tim Ruskell has called a "nonstop" effort.

Ruskell has said the sticking point is Curry's representatives basing their position on the $28 million guaranteed that fifth overall pick Mark Sanchez got from the New York Jets.

The Seahawks believe top quarterbacks traditionally get richer deals than players at other positions.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on August 02, 2009, 07:59:25 PM
Quote from: Neil on August 02, 2009, 11:03:36 AM
Vince Young Texans jersey?  That's just weird.  And he's a divisional opponent, to boot.

College football fans are weird.

I'm inclined to think that dude happened to have that jersey made prior to the draft in anticipation of the Texans picking Vince Young #1, and since authentic Reebok customized jerseys are like $250, it's the only one he's got...so..you know...that's what he has to wear when he checks out TC.

Or he's just a tool.  :P
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 02, 2009, 08:43:51 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on August 02, 2009, 07:59:25 PM
Quote from: Neil on August 02, 2009, 11:03:36 AM
Vince Young Texans jersey?  That's just weird.  And he's a divisional opponent, to boot.

College football fans are weird.

I'm inclined to think that dude happened to have that jersey made prior to the draft in anticipation of the Texans picking Vince Young #1, and since authentic Reebok customized jerseys are like $250, it's the only one he's got...so..you know...that's what he has to wear when he checks out TC.

Or he's just a tool.  :P
Only retards thought that the Texans would pick Young.  And it turns out that Mario Williams has performed better than any of the other top 10 picks in that draft, with the possible exception of D'Brickashaw Ferguson.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on August 02, 2009, 08:46:08 PM
I see Beanie Wells sprained his ankle already. Enjoy the injuries Cardinals fans.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Strix on August 05, 2009, 09:08:11 AM
Quote from: CBSSportslineALBANY, N.Y. -- Eli Manning has agreed to a new six-year, $97 million contract extension with the New York Giants that will make him the highest-paid player in the NFL with an average salary of roughly $15.3 million.

A person close to the talks who asked not to be identified because the deal was not signed says Manning is guaranteed $35 million under the deal which will keep him with the Giants through the 2015 season.

Manning, who led the Giants to a Super Bowl upset of the New England Patriots in February 2008 and was named the MVP of the game, was in the final year of the contract he signed as the No. 1 overall pick in 2004.

Manning took over as the Giants starter midway through his rookie season and he has led New York to the playoffs in each of the past four seasons.

:bleeding:

He hasn't even cracked the top 10 in Passer Rating in his career during any season and he becomes the highest paid? WTF Giants!

He actually threw less TD's last season than in any season he started.  Granted he cut his interceptions in half but I am not sure that merits being given such a hefty raise. He was still the 11th most intercepted QB last season.

He basically gives you 20-24 TD's and 15-18 INT's a season with a passer rating in the high 70's. I am not sure that even makes him the most valuable player on his team let alone in the NFL.

Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on August 05, 2009, 09:18:07 AM
Quote from: Neil on August 02, 2009, 08:43:51 PM
Only retards thought that the Texans would pick Young.  And it turns out that Mario Williams has performed better than any of the other top 10 picks in that draft, with the possible exception of D'Brickashaw Ferguson.

To be honest, Ferguson was the only one in that draft that I didn't have to sort of....convince myself....that he'd be useful (for obvious reasons).  Mario Williams wasn't even really on the radar, of course.  It was either Bush, Young, or Ferguson, with Reggie Bush, obviously, being the primary one. 

They did get Eric Winston later (3rd round) in that draft though, and he has become an excellent RT.  They drafted Charles Spencer one pick ahead of Winston to be their LT, but his leg got destroyed by Ron Dayne, and he plays....somewhere else now.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 05, 2009, 10:38:53 AM
Quote from: Strix on August 05, 2009, 09:08:11 AM
Quote from: CBSSportslineALBANY, N.Y. -- Eli Manning has agreed to a new six-year, $97 million contract extension with the New York Giants that will make him the highest-paid player in the NFL with an average salary of roughly $15.3 million.

A person close to the talks who asked not to be identified because the deal was not signed says Manning is guaranteed $35 million under the deal which will keep him with the Giants through the 2015 season.

Manning, who led the Giants to a Super Bowl upset of the New England Patriots in February 2008 and was named the MVP of the game, was in the final year of the contract he signed as the No. 1 overall pick in 2004.

Manning took over as the Giants starter midway through his rookie season and he has led New York to the playoffs in each of the past four seasons.

:bleeding:

He hasn't even cracked the top 10 in Passer Rating in his career during any season and he becomes the highest paid? WTF Giants!

He actually threw less TD's last season than in any season he started.  Granted he cut his interceptions in half but I am not sure that merits being given such a hefty raise. He was still the 11th most intercepted QB last season.

He basically gives you 20-24 TD's and 15-18 INT's a season with a passer rating in the high 70's. I am not sure that even makes him the most valuable player on his team let alone in the NFL.
Superbowl-winning QBs get a lot of money, especially if their clutch play resulted in the Superbowl win.  People who have their deals done this year make more money than people who got their deals in 04 or 05, like Peyton or Tom Brady.  When their contracts run out after the 2010 season, and assuming they're both still playing at a high level, Eli's deal will look like chickenfeed next to what they'll get.

Besides, look at the Giants.  They don't really have any marquee players.  Their big wideout is done forever.  They have a platoon back system.  Their loudmouth, overrated ex-TE is trying to avoid getting his ass kicked by Drew Brees, and while Boss is good, he's not going to conquer the league or become a national personality.  Their D is full of workmen, but only Pierce really has a big name, and even then he's second-flight.  Eli is the face of the franchise, and so he gets paid extra.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Vince on August 05, 2009, 10:56:31 AM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on August 05, 2009, 09:18:07 AM
Quote from: Neil on August 02, 2009, 08:43:51 PM
Only retards thought that the Texans would pick Young.  And it turns out that Mario Williams has performed better than any of the other top 10 picks in that draft, with the possible exception of D'Brickashaw Ferguson.

To be honest, Ferguson was the only one in that draft that I didn't have to sort of....convince myself....that he'd be useful (for obvious reasons).  Mario Williams wasn't even really on the radar, of course.  It was either Bush, Young, or Ferguson, with Reggie Bush, obviously, being the primary one. 

They did get Eric Winston later (3rd round) in that draft though, and he has become an excellent RT.  They drafted Charles Spencer one pick ahead of Winston to be their LT, but his leg got destroyed by Ron Dayne, and he plays....somewhere else now.

I'm a little surprised D'Brick is held in such high regard from that draft class.  Don't get me wrong that's the guy I wanted the Jets to draft and I'm a big proponent of building the lines first but even up until last year there were still annoying Jets fans bitching about passing on Leinhart/Cutler claiming D'Brick was a bust.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Vince on August 05, 2009, 10:59:19 AM
Quote from: Strix on August 05, 2009, 09:08:11 AM
:bleeding:

He hasn't even cracked the top 10 in Passer Rating in his career during any season and he becomes the highest paid? WTF Giants!

He actually threw less TD's last season than in any season he started.  Granted he cut his interceptions in half but I am not sure that merits being given such a hefty raise. He was still the 11th most intercepted QB last season.

He basically gives you 20-24 TD's and 15-18 INT's a season with a passer rating in the high 70's. I am not sure that even makes him the most valuable player on his team let alone in the NFL.

After all the BS the Mannings pulled to get Eli drafted by the Giants I'm not surprised Eli (or maybe Archie?) could convince them to give him an massive extension.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on August 05, 2009, 11:02:33 AM
Quote from: Vince on August 05, 2009, 10:56:31 AM
I'm a little surprised D'Brick is held in such high regard from that draft class.  Don't get me wrong that's the guy I wanted the Jets to draft and I'm a big proponent of building the lines first but even up until last year there were still annoying Jets fans bitching about passing on Leinhart/Cutler claiming D'Brick was a bust.

Well remember, I was looking at it from the perspective of a Texans fan in 2006.  IIRC, their LT in 05 was...I believe that was when they tried to get Chester Pitts to play LT.  He's a guard, not a tackle, and holy shit, it really didn't work out.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Vince on August 06, 2009, 08:26:31 AM
Who knew Vince Young was a part-time comedian?
 
http://www.esquire.com/features/what-ive-learned/vince-young-biography-0909 (http://www.esquire.com/features/what-ive-learned/vince-young-biography-0909)

QuoteI don't know when I'll start again. But I will be the next black quarterback to win a Super Bowl. And I will be in the Hall of Fame.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: ehrie on August 06, 2009, 08:48:41 AM
Quote from: Neil on August 05, 2009, 10:38:53 AM
Quote from: Strix on August 05, 2009, 09:08:11 AM
Quote from: CBSSportslineALBANY, N.Y. -- Eli Manning has agreed to a new six-year, $97 million contract extension with the New York Giants that will make him the highest-paid player in the NFL with an average salary of roughly $15.3 million.

A person close to the talks who asked not to be identified because the deal was not signed says Manning is guaranteed $35 million under the deal which will keep him with the Giants through the 2015 season.

Manning, who led the Giants to a Super Bowl upset of the New England Patriots in February 2008 and was named the MVP of the game, was in the final year of the contract he signed as the No. 1 overall pick in 2004.

Manning took over as the Giants starter midway through his rookie season and he has led New York to the playoffs in each of the past four seasons.

:bleeding:

He hasn't even cracked the top 10 in Passer Rating in his career during any season and he becomes the highest paid? WTF Giants!

He actually threw less TD's last season than in any season he started.  Granted he cut his interceptions in half but I am not sure that merits being given such a hefty raise. He was still the 11th most intercepted QB last season.

He basically gives you 20-24 TD's and 15-18 INT's a season with a passer rating in the high 70's. I am not sure that even makes him the most valuable player on his team let alone in the NFL.
Superbowl-winning QBs get a lot of money, especially if their clutch play resulted in the Superbowl win.  People who have their deals done this year make more money than people who got their deals in 04 or 05, like Peyton or Tom Brady.  When their contracts run out after the 2010 season, and assuming they're both still playing at a high level, Eli's deal will look like chickenfeed next to what they'll get.

Besides, look at the Giants.  They don't really have any marquee players.  Their big wideout is done forever.  They have a platoon back system.  Their loudmouth, overrated ex-TE is trying to avoid getting his ass kicked by Drew Brees, and while Boss is good, he's not going to conquer the league or become a national personality.  Their D is full of workmen, but only Pierce really has a big name, and even then he's second-flight.  Eli is the face of the franchise, and so he gets paid extra.

Justin Tuck is workman? O_o
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on August 06, 2009, 09:01:27 AM
So..the offensive strategy against the Texans looks like it's going to be the Tecmo Bowl style "run backwards -> heave ball as far as possible -> touchdown" type deal.  Dunta Robinson is holding out and Jacques Reeves broke his leg, leaving a bunch of new guy corners.  They're having to bring in washed up type veterans like Deltha O'Neal and Mike McKenzie to at least have some experience out there. :bleeding:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 06, 2009, 09:19:34 AM
Quote from: Vince on August 05, 2009, 10:56:31 AM
I'm a little surprised D'Brick is held in such high regard from that draft class.  Don't get me wrong that's the guy I wanted the Jets to draft and I'm a big proponent of building the lines first but even up until last year there were still annoying Jets fans bitching about passing on Leinhart/Cutler claiming D'Brick was a bust.
Those Jets fans are kinda stupid though.  Passing on Leinart's noodle arm and Cutler's inconsistant play (and massive ego) is looking pretty clever to me.  How did Leinart do as QB, even though he had one of the top two receiving tandems in the NFL?  What did Cutler do when the pressure was on last year?  Cutler is 17-20 as a starter, and hasn't made the playoffs once, on a team that made the playoffs every year under Jake Plummer.  Leinart is 7-9, and some of those wins belond to Kurt Warner coming in as backup.  Based on their records, the Jets would be better trying to sign Plummer (68-67) out of retirement.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 06, 2009, 09:30:14 AM
Quote from: ehrie on August 06, 2009, 08:48:41 AM
Justin Tuck is workman? O_o
Not really.  And neither is Umenyiora.  Neither one of them is the face of the franchise though.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Vince on August 06, 2009, 05:48:38 PM
Quote from: Neil on August 06, 2009, 09:19:34 AM
Those Jets fans are kinda stupid though.  Passing on Leinart's noodle arm and Cutler's inconsistant play (and massive ego) is looking pretty clever to me.  How did Leinart do as QB, even though he had one of the top two receiving tandems in the NFL?  What did Cutler do when the pressure was on last year?  Cutler is 17-20 as a starter, and hasn't made the playoffs once, on a team that made the playoffs every year under Jake Plummer.  Leinart is 7-9, and some of those wins belond to Kurt Warner coming in as backup.  Based on their records, the Jets would be better trying to sign Plummer (68-67) out of retirement.

Hey no disagreement from me. 

<rant>
Those Jets fans are really stupid.  In the 2006 draft they bitch and moaned because the Jets passed on the flashy player Leinhart who according to them would magically turn the team around and lead them to a Super Bowl single-handedly.  Point out the Jets OL was terrible and was the worst part of the offense and they would just ignore it saying building the line wasn't important.  Those same fans every year cling to each young QB NY brings in during preseason turning on the guy they sackrode a year before.  Wouldn't you know the Jets draft OL early that year and now have the one of the better OLs in football while Leinhart is lucky if he makes backup in Arizona. 

This year the New Hotness(tm) is Sanchez.  These same fans are arguing that so long as Sanchez doesn't vomit, cry, faint or run out of the building during preseason he should be anointed the starter regardless of how he plays.  It's annoying as hell debating with these people.   
</rant>
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 06, 2009, 07:21:30 PM
Poor Jets.  They have no chance of winning their division, what with Brady coming back to lend his arm to the Cheatriots and the Dolphins having a better D and better QB.  And the wildcard scene isn't pretty, what with strong second-place contenders in place for 3 of the 4 divisions.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 06, 2009, 09:03:28 PM
Well, all the teams that passed on Crabtree are looking pretty smart right now.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadImmortalMan on August 06, 2009, 10:25:49 PM
Quote from: Neil on August 06, 2009, 09:03:28 PM
Well, all the teams that passed on Crabtree are looking pretty smart right now.

:nelson @ 49ers
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: katmai on August 07, 2009, 12:02:12 AM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on August 06, 2009, 10:25:49 PM
Quote from: Neil on August 06, 2009, 09:03:28 PM
Well, all the teams that passed on Crabtree are looking pretty smart right now.

:nelson @ 49ers
:Embarrass: :mad:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Vince on August 07, 2009, 11:12:55 AM
Quote from: Neil on August 06, 2009, 07:21:30 PM
Poor Jets.  They have no chance of winning their division, what with Brady coming back to lend his arm to the Cheatriots and the Dolphins having a better D and better QB.  And the wildcard scene isn't pretty, what with strong second-place contenders in place for 3 of the 4 divisions.

Jets will make the playoffs you watch.  Rex Ryan will turn the Jets D into one of the best in football.  Bart Scott will be the Ray Ray of the AFC East and make Brady wish he stayed on IR.   :menace:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Liep on August 07, 2009, 11:15:16 AM
Quote from: Vince on August 07, 2009, 11:12:55 AM

Jets will make the playoffs you watch.  Rex Ryan will turn the Jets D into one of the best in football.  Bart Scott will be the Ray Ray of the AFC East and make Brady wish he stayed on IR.   :menace:

Ahh, August. The month before Jets fans loose hope.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Sophie Scholl on August 07, 2009, 05:58:44 PM
Quote from: katmai on August 07, 2009, 12:02:12 AM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on August 06, 2009, 10:25:49 PM
Quote from: Neil on August 06, 2009, 09:03:28 PM
Well, all the teams that passed on Crabtree are looking pretty smart right now.

:nelson @ 49ers
:Embarrass: :mad:
Say what you will about DHB, but at this rate, even if he only has one catch all season he'll still make the Raiders look like the smarter Bay Area team. :cool:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 07, 2009, 06:03:48 PM
Quote from: Vince on August 07, 2009, 11:12:55 AM
Quote from: Neil on August 06, 2009, 07:21:30 PM
Poor Jets.  They have no chance of winning their division, what with Brady coming back to lend his arm to the Cheatriots and the Dolphins having a better D and better QB.  And the wildcard scene isn't pretty, what with strong second-place contenders in place for 3 of the 4 divisions.

Jets will make the playoffs you watch.  Rex Ryan will turn the Jets D into one of the best in football.  Bart Scott will be the Ray Ray of the AFC East and make Brady wish he stayed on IR.   :menace:
Sure, just like Marvin Lewis made the Bengals into a defensive powerhouse, or Mike Nolan revitalized San Francisco.  Or the way Billick turned Baltimore into the highest scoring team in NFL history, right?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on August 07, 2009, 06:07:02 PM
Quote from: Neil on August 07, 2009, 06:03:48 PM
Sure, just like Marvin Lewis made the Bengals into a defensive powerhouse, or Mike Nolan revitalized San Francisco.  Or the way Billick turned Baltimore into the highest scoring team in NFL history, right?

You also forgot such notables as future HOF Jamie Sharper with the Texans, and Wheaties Box Cover Boy Adalius Thomas with the Cheatriots.  Big careers there.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 07, 2009, 06:17:31 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on August 07, 2009, 06:07:02 PM
Quote from: Neil on August 07, 2009, 06:03:48 PM
Sure, just like Marvin Lewis made the Bengals into a defensive powerhouse, or Mike Nolan revitalized San Francisco.  Or the way Billick turned Baltimore into the highest scoring team in NFL history, right?

You also forgot such notables as future HOF Jamie Sharper with the Texans, and Wheaties Box Cover Boy Adalius Thomas with the Cheatriots.  Big careers there.
Or Edgerton Hartwell's legendary run with the Falcons, or whoever Chris McAlister ends up with.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on August 07, 2009, 07:29:08 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on August 07, 2009, 06:07:02 PM
You also forgot such notables as future HOF Jamie Sharper

Jamie Sharper is way too underappreciated in Houston.  He was no Ray Lewis or LT or anything, but he sure as hell manned up and did his job, even when most of the rest of the team just didn't bother.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on August 08, 2009, 04:51:12 PM
What a shocking development  :rolleyes:

http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/32343676/ns/sports/

QuoteDid Roethlisberger accuser brag about sex?
Woman who made rape claim reportedly 'did not appear to be upset'

updated 5 minutes ago

RENO, Nev. - The woman suing quarterback Ben Roethlisberger for alleged sexual assault has been accused of bragging about having consensual sex with him to a co-worker.

According to court documents filed late Friday, Angela Antonetti said the woman who made the rape claim "did not appear to be upset, stressed-out or nervous" about her time with the Pittsburgh Steelers star during a 2008 celebrity golf tournament at Lake Tahoe.

Antonetti says her Harrah's hotel-casino co-worker "appeared happy and boastful" about it and later said she thought she might be pregnant from the encounter.

Lawyer Cal Dunlap, who represents the woman, declined to comment.

In her lawsuit, the 31-year-old Nevada woman says the two-time Super Bowl winner raped her, a claim he vehemently denies.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on August 08, 2009, 06:29:28 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on August 08, 2009, 04:51:12 PM
What a shocking development  :rolleyes:

Fuck you.  Tyson's alleged victim did the same thing, and his black ass still went to jail.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Strix on August 08, 2009, 06:41:47 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on August 08, 2009, 06:29:28 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on August 08, 2009, 04:51:12 PM
What a shocking development  :rolleyes:

Fuck you.  Tyson's alleged victim did the same thing, and his black ass still went to jail.

Tyson didn't win two Superbowls.  ;)
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on August 08, 2009, 07:08:05 PM
Seahawks sign Curry

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/08/08/seahawks-get-curry-under-contract/
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: citizen k on August 08, 2009, 08:06:39 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on August 08, 2009, 07:08:05 PM
Seahawks sign Curry

...the deal is for six years and $60 million, with $34 million guaranteed, according to a league source.


Seattle is getting hosed by a rookie. The third overall draft pick "just" got $31 million guaranteed.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 08, 2009, 10:30:21 PM
Quote from: Strix on August 08, 2009, 06:41:47 PM
Tyson didn't win two Superbowls.  ;)
Worthlessberger isn't being tried in Pittsburgh.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Strix on August 08, 2009, 10:32:41 PM
Quote from: Neil on August 08, 2009, 10:30:21 PM
Quote from: Strix on August 08, 2009, 06:41:47 PM
Tyson didn't win two Superbowls.  ;)
Worthlessberger isn't being tried in Pittsburgh.

Unlike the Ravens, the Steelers travel well as a franchise. Just like Starbucks you can find fans on any street corner in the United States. Tyson was a big fish in a little circle. You say "Big Ben" anywhere in the US and it isn't a clock tower in London that first comes to people's minds.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Sophie Scholl on August 08, 2009, 10:36:58 PM
There are Bandwagon Bitches nationwide, it's true.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 08, 2009, 10:38:01 PM
Quote from: Strix on August 08, 2009, 10:32:41 PM
Quote from: Neil on August 08, 2009, 10:30:21 PM
Quote from: Strix on August 08, 2009, 06:41:47 PM
Tyson didn't win two Superbowls.  ;)
Worthlessberger isn't being tried in Pittsburgh.

Unlike the Ravens, the Steelers travel well as a franchise. Just like Starbucks you can find fans on any street corner in the United States. Tyson was a big fish in a little circle. You say "Big Ben" anywhere in the US and it isn't a clock tower in London that first comes to people's minds.
I very much doubt that.

Besides, bandwagoners or no, Nevada will execute Roethlisberger.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadImmortalMan on August 09, 2009, 02:33:08 AM
Quote from: Neil on August 08, 2009, 10:38:01 PM
Quote from: Strix on August 08, 2009, 10:32:41 PM
Quote from: Neil on August 08, 2009, 10:30:21 PM
Quote from: Strix on August 08, 2009, 06:41:47 PM
Tyson didn't win two Superbowls.  ;)
Worthlessberger isn't being tried in Pittsburgh.

Unlike the Ravens, the Steelers travel well as a franchise. Just like Starbucks you can find fans on any street corner in the United States. Tyson was a big fish in a little circle. You say "Big Ben" anywhere in the US and it isn't a clock tower in London that first comes to people's minds.
I very much doubt that.

Besides, bandwagoners or no, Nevada will execute Roethlisberger.


Mrs. MIM has Jury duty...


:menace:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on August 09, 2009, 03:24:32 AM
Quote from: citizen k on August 08, 2009, 08:06:39 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on August 08, 2009, 07:08:05 PM
Seahawks sign Curry

...the deal is for six years and $60 million, with $34 million guaranteed, according to a league source.


Seattle is getting hosed by a rookie. The third overall draft pick "just" got $31 million guaranteed.
He's can't miss, not like the quaterbacks that everyone's been slobbering over.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 09, 2009, 06:57:48 AM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on August 09, 2009, 03:24:32 AM
Quote from: citizen k on August 08, 2009, 08:06:39 PM
Seattle is getting hosed by a rookie. The third overall draft pick "just" got $31 million guaranteed.
He's can't miss, not like the quaterbacks that everyone's been slobbering over.
Really?  Tell that to Brian Bosworth.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Strix on August 09, 2009, 10:27:09 AM
Quote from: Neil
Really?  Tell that to Brian Bosworth.

Bosworth never missed. It's just that Jackson ran him over like Timmay trying to cross I-95 in rush hour.  :lmfao:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on August 09, 2009, 10:29:06 AM
Quote from: Neil on August 08, 2009, 10:38:01 PM
Quote from: Strix on August 08, 2009, 10:32:41 PM
Quote from: Neil on August 08, 2009, 10:30:21 PM
Quote from: Strix on August 08, 2009, 06:41:47 PM
Tyson didn't win two Superbowls.  ;)
Worthlessberger isn't being tried in Pittsburgh.

Unlike the Ravens, the Steelers travel well as a franchise. Just like Starbucks you can find fans on any street corner in the United States. Tyson was a big fish in a little circle. You say "Big Ben" anywhere in the US and it isn't a clock tower in London that first comes to people's minds.
I very much doubt that.

Besides, bandwagoners or no, Nevada will execute Roethlisberger.

Rapistburger.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: derspiess on August 09, 2009, 01:50:56 PM
As much as I dislike Roethlisberger, I can't bring myself to engage in any of this schadenfreude.  This whole thing smelled of "crazy stuipid bitch trying to grab money" from the beginning.

Moving on to *real* criminals, I went to Bungles training camp yesterday.  Kinda cool since I hadn't been to one in the while, but I probably watched no more than 10-15 plays since I was busy chasing my kid all over the place.  After the fake scrimmage (shoulderpads & helmets only), they had a "family barbecue" & my kid threw a ball that hit Carson Palmer in the knee. 
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 09, 2009, 02:35:17 PM
Quote from: derspiess on August 09, 2009, 01:50:56 PM
As much as I dislike Roethlisberger, I can't bring myself to engage in any of this schadenfreude.  This whole thing smelled of "crazy stuipid bitch trying to grab money" from the beginning.
To be sure.  On the other hand, it's yet another opportunity to mock that guy's stupidity.
QuoteMoving on to *real* criminals, I went to Bungles training camp yesterday.  Kinda cool since I hadn't been to one in the while, but I probably watched no more than 10-15 plays since I was busy chasing my kid all over the place.  After the fake scrimmage (shoulderpads & helmets only), they had a "family barbecue" & my kid threw a ball that hit Carson Palmer in the knee.
Be careful.  If your kid wrecks that fragile knee, how will you feel?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: katmai on August 09, 2009, 02:57:08 PM
Quote from: Judas Iscariot on August 07, 2009, 05:58:44 PM
Quote from: katmai on August 07, 2009, 12:02:12 AM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on August 06, 2009, 10:25:49 PM
Quote from: Neil on August 06, 2009, 09:03:28 PM
Well, all the teams that passed on Crabtree are looking pretty smart right now.

:nelson @ 49ers
:Embarrass: :mad:
Say what you will about DHB, but at this rate, even if he only has one catch all season he'll still make the Raiders look like the smarter Bay Area team. :cool:
well considering crabtree's agent has said je has no idea what this cousin/advisor is talking about I'll be expecting him in uniform by opening day
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: derspiess on August 09, 2009, 03:15:38 PM
Quote from: Neil on August 09, 2009, 02:35:17 PM
Be careful.  If your kid wrecks that fragile knee, how will you feel?

No shit-- we'd have to move away.  Then again, it would be cool if my 18-month old had a strong enough arm to do that with a nerf ball.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on August 09, 2009, 05:30:23 PM
I bet Sanchez's heart skipped a beat when Mangold injured his knee in camp.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on August 09, 2009, 05:30:59 PM
Also folks, Hall of Fame preseason game tonight. The Vince Young agony tour begins tonight.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 09, 2009, 07:49:59 PM
Quote from: Ed Anger on August 09, 2009, 05:30:59 PM
Also folks, Hall of Fame preseason game tonight. The Vince Young agony tour begins tonight.
That's 1 INT for VY.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on August 09, 2009, 07:54:40 PM
All former AFL teams should revert to their original uniforms.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Grey Fox on August 09, 2009, 08:06:14 PM
It sucks that they keep using the "Titans".
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on August 09, 2009, 08:39:46 PM
That was a nice little tribute to John Madden.
Not always my favorite commentator, he's always been there in the NFL since my earliest memories.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on August 09, 2009, 08:52:53 PM
Thank God football is here again.

Edit:  They should shut up about Vick.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: derspiess on August 09, 2009, 09:27:59 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on August 09, 2009, 07:54:40 PM
All former AFL teams should revert to their original uniforms.

Yep.  Particularly, the Chiefs should wear the old Dallas Texans uniforms & use the same logo to confuse the hell out of everyone.

The Bungles aren't doing the "Legacy Weekends" thing this season, as they weren't one of the original 8 AFL teams :( 
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on August 09, 2009, 09:47:49 PM
I want Lekkerkerker's autograph.  Quite a name.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 09, 2009, 10:13:47 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on August 09, 2009, 08:52:53 PM
Edit:  They should shut up about Vick.
I'm shocked that he hasn't signed with the Bengals yet.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Valmy on August 09, 2009, 10:21:01 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on August 09, 2009, 08:52:53 PM
Thank God football is here again.

I am sorry Major League Baseball has more in common with an actual football season than the crapy NFL preseason games.

I never watch a football game until the first snap that counts.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Valmy on August 09, 2009, 10:22:39 PM
Quote from: derspiess on August 09, 2009, 09:27:59 PM
The Bungles aren't doing the "Legacy Weekends" thing this season, as they weren't one of the original 8 AFL teams :( 

Um...the Dolphins were also an AFL expansion team are they not doing it either?  If not that is crap, the Bengals and the Dolphins were both AFL teams as much as the other 8 darnit.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on August 09, 2009, 10:24:23 PM
Quote from: Valmy on August 09, 2009, 10:21:01 PM
I never watch a football game until the first snap that counts.

But by doing this, you miss all of Vince Young's playing time!
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Valmy on August 09, 2009, 10:26:30 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on August 09, 2009, 10:24:23 PM
But by doing this, you miss all of Vince Young's playing time!

I sorta consider his career over at this point, I will be overjoyed if he proves me wrong but he had his chance and didn't get it done.

This is the NFL you don't get too many second chances.  That is also why I don't see Chris Sims starting again which is kinda shitty since he lost his job through his spleen rupturing but oh well.  Colt McCoy will be the next Longhorn hope to finally produce an NFL QB after Bobby Layne.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on August 09, 2009, 10:33:43 PM
Hell it's only Kyle Orton in front of Simms, so it's not like it's some insurmountable obstacle for the dude.  Kerry Collins is getting pretty old and his liver just has to be ready to quit soon too.

Not that I give a flying shit about them after they leave Texas and go play for teams not called the Houston Texans.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Valmy on August 09, 2009, 10:35:13 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on August 09, 2009, 10:33:43 PM
Hell it's only Kyle Orton in front of Simms, so it's not like it's some insurmountable obstacle for the dude.  Kerry Collins is getting pretty old and his liver just has to be ready to quit soon too.

Not that I give a flying shit about them after they leave Texas and go play for teams not called the Houston Texans.

Well...to the extent that I give a shit I wish them well.

It is not like the endless monotony of mediocre seasons the Redskins have produced since 1992 have really given me much to be entertained by.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Vince on August 10, 2009, 06:23:15 AM
Quote from: Ed Anger on August 09, 2009, 05:30:23 PM
I bet Sanchez's heart skipped a beat when Mangold injured his knee in camp.

He's gonna be okay!   ^_^

Mangold is the best damn player on that line.  The Jets can't lose him.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 10, 2009, 06:31:34 AM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on August 09, 2009, 10:33:43 PM
Hell it's only Kyle Orton in front of Simms, so it's not like it's some insurmountable obstacle for the dude.  Kerry Collins is getting pretty old and his liver just has to be ready to quit soon too.
Yeah, but Young is in a bad spot.  He's in danger of being relegated to third string.  When Collins is done, there's no guarantee that the Titans will go to Vince Young.  He's in real danger of showing up on 'Top 10 Draft Busts' in a couple of years.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on August 10, 2009, 08:33:03 AM
Quote from: Valmy on August 09, 2009, 10:21:01 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on August 09, 2009, 08:52:53 PM
Thank God football is here again.

I am sorry Major League Baseball has more in common with an actual football season than the crapy NFL preseason games.

I never watch a football game until the first snap that counts.

Communist.  <_<
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Valmy on August 10, 2009, 08:35:46 AM
Quote from: Neil on August 10, 2009, 06:31:34 AM
Yeah, but Young is in a bad spot.  He's in danger of being relegated to third string.  When Collins is done, there's no guarantee that the Titans will go to Vince Young.  He's in real danger of showing up on 'Top 10 Draft Busts' in a couple of years.

I find that hard to believe.  He did win Rookie of the year and take them to the playoffs before we went emo, Vince Young is fucking John Elway compared to Heath Shuler God knows.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Valmy on August 10, 2009, 08:37:01 AM
Quote from: Ed Anger on August 10, 2009, 08:33:03 AM
Communist.  <_<

Not even Stalin would have forced his political prisoners to pay that much to watch practice.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on August 10, 2009, 08:38:42 AM
Quote from: Valmy on August 10, 2009, 08:37:01 AM
Quote from: Ed Anger on August 10, 2009, 08:33:03 AM
Communist.  <_<

Not even Stalin would have forced his political prisoners to pay that much to watch practice.

Yes, he would have.

Plus you missed AJ Trapasso run a fake punt 40 yards for a TD. His goofy white boy run was hilarious.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 10, 2009, 08:52:02 AM
Quote from: Valmy on August 10, 2009, 08:37:01 AM
Quote from: Ed Anger on August 10, 2009, 08:33:03 AM
Communist.  <_<

Not even Stalin would have forced his political prisoners to pay that much to watch practice.
If you already get TV, it doesn't cost anything. :huh:

At any rate, that's a common saying by people who are stupid.  Just because the first-stringers aren't playing the whole game doesn't make it practice.  And given that the guys who are playing most of the game are battling for roster spots or starting positions, I guarantee you that most of them aren't half-assing it either.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Vince on August 10, 2009, 08:56:14 AM
Quote from: Valmy on August 10, 2009, 08:37:01 AM
Quote from: Ed Anger on August 10, 2009, 08:33:03 AM
Communist.  <_<

Not even Stalin would have forced his political prisoners to pay that much to watch practice.

Why pay when you can just follow the Twitter feeds?   ;)
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: derspiess on August 10, 2009, 09:17:30 AM
Quote from: Valmy on August 09, 2009, 10:22:39 PM
Um...the Dolphins were also an AFL expansion team are they not doing it either?  If not that is crap, the Bengals and the Dolphins were both AFL teams as much as the other 8 darnit.

Dolphins: I would say yes. 

But the Bengals were founded after the merger deal had been done so as much as I hate to say it, they were sort of a "yes & no" AFL team.  Paul Brown didn't like the AFL (one of his few faults), and the only reason he started the Bengals as an AFL franchise was that he was promised it would be an NFL franchise after the merger.

I *would* like to see the Bungles & Browns play each other in throwback uniforms, espec. since the Bengals original uniform was identical to the Browns, with the exception of the janky "BENGALS" lettering on the helmet.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: derspiess on August 10, 2009, 09:22:22 AM
Quote from: Neil on August 10, 2009, 08:52:02 AM
At any rate, that's a common saying by people who are stupid.  Just because the first-stringers aren't playing the whole game doesn't make it practice.  And given that the guys who are playing most of the game are battling for roster spots or starting positions, I guarantee you that most of them aren't half-assing it either.

Yup.  I like going to pre-season games because I can relax & just watch some individual players I'm interested in.  I do feel sorry for the suckers who pay to see those games, though.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on August 10, 2009, 09:22:31 AM
I'd like to see the old Bengals uniforms burned. With Odell Thurman in them.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Valmy on August 10, 2009, 09:22:51 AM
Quote from: Neil on August 10, 2009, 08:52:02 AM
At any rate, that's a common saying by people who are stupid.  Just because the first-stringers aren't playing the whole game doesn't make it practice.  And given that the guys who are playing most of the game are battling for roster spots or starting positions, I guarantee you that most of them aren't half-assing it either.

Any "game" where the score is meaningless is practice.  I am sure players go hard in practice to and good on them.  I don't wan't to see it though.

QuoteIf you already get TV, it doesn't cost anything.

Yeah I am talking about the fans actually at the games.  Anyway it is a personal preference I used to watch preseason all the time until one day it suddenly popped into my head 'why am I watching this crap?'
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 10, 2009, 09:41:05 AM
Quote from: Valmy on August 10, 2009, 09:22:51 AM
Any "game" where the score is meaningless is practice.  I am sure players go hard in practice to and good on them.  I don't wan't to see it though.
Fortunately, the score in a preseason game determines who wins and who loses the game.  Therefore, since the score is not meaningless, a preseason game is not practice.

You see?  I have defeated your weak definitional argument.  Now burn an offering to Me.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Valmy on August 10, 2009, 09:43:17 AM
Quote from: Neil on August 10, 2009, 09:41:05 AM
You see?  I have defeated your weak definitional argument.  Now burn an offering to Me.

Hey knock yourself out watching meaningless games I don't watch them...just like I don't really care about College Bowl Games.  At least those sort of count for warm fuzzies for next season.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on August 10, 2009, 09:46:11 AM
Quote from: Valmy on August 10, 2009, 09:43:17 AM
just like I don't really care about College Bowl Games. 

Unamerican.  <_<

Reported to the House Unamerican activities committee.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Valmy on August 10, 2009, 09:46:58 AM
Quote from: Ed Anger on August 10, 2009, 09:46:11 AM
Unamerican.  <_<

Reported to the House Unamerican activities committee.

Oh come now.  How many non-Ohio State bowl games do you actually watch anymore?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on August 10, 2009, 09:49:02 AM
Quote from: Valmy on August 10, 2009, 09:46:58 AM
Quote from: Ed Anger on August 10, 2009, 09:46:11 AM
Unamerican.  <_<

Reported to the House Unamerican activities committee.

Oh come now.  How many non-Ohio State bowl games do you actually watch anymore?

My wife has to use a crowbar to get me off the couch.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Grey Fox on August 10, 2009, 09:51:26 AM
But that has nothing to do with football.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: charliebear on August 10, 2009, 10:42:48 AM
Pre-season starts soon :XD: :bleeding:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Grey Fox on August 10, 2009, 11:14:59 AM
We need 1 more team in the LFFL.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadImmortalMan on August 10, 2009, 11:24:39 AM
Quote from: Grey Fox on August 10, 2009, 11:14:59 AM
We need 1 more team in the LFFL.

Sounds fun, but I've never done fantasy football and I'd be pretty lost.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 10, 2009, 11:30:07 AM
Quote from: Valmy on August 10, 2009, 09:43:17 AM
Quote from: Neil on August 10, 2009, 09:41:05 AM
You see?  I have defeated your weak definitional argument.  Now burn an offering to Me.

Hey knock yourself out watching meaningless games I don't watch them...just like I don't really care about College Bowl Games.  At least those sort of count for warm fuzzies for next season.
Whether you watch them or not isn't the issue.  What is at issue is your use of the word 'practice' to describe these games.  I couldn't care less if you watch them or not.  All that matters to Me is that, deep down, you know for certain that you are less than I, and that you weep and gnash your teeth for having mischaracterized these games.

As for college bowl games...  Does any college football actually count for anything?  I wouldn't know, because I'm not likely to watch it.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: sbr on August 10, 2009, 06:21:41 PM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on August 10, 2009, 11:24:39 AM
Quote from: Grey Fox on August 10, 2009, 11:14:59 AM
We need 1 more team in the LFFL.

Sounds fun, but I've never done fantasy football and I'd be pretty lost.

Did you just join?

When is the draft, I might be able to join if MIM didn't and I can make the draft.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Barrister on August 10, 2009, 06:49:58 PM
Quote from: Neil on August 10, 2009, 08:52:02 AM
Quote from: Valmy on August 10, 2009, 08:37:01 AM
Quote from: Ed Anger on August 10, 2009, 08:33:03 AM
Communist.  <_<

Not even Stalin would have forced his political prisoners to pay that much to watch practice.
If you already get TV, it doesn't cost anything. :huh:

At any rate, that's a common saying by people who are stupid.  Just because the first-stringers aren't playing the whole game doesn't make it practice.  And given that the guys who are playing most of the game are battling for roster spots or starting positions, I guarantee you that most of them aren't half-assing it either.

The better question is why would you watch a boring pre-season game when there was a regular-season CFL game on at the same time?   :huh:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadImmortalMan on August 10, 2009, 07:02:06 PM
Quote from: sbr on August 10, 2009, 06:21:41 PM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on August 10, 2009, 11:24:39 AM
Quote from: Grey Fox on August 10, 2009, 11:14:59 AM
We need 1 more team in the LFFL.

Sounds fun, but I've never done fantasy football and I'd be pretty lost.

Did you just join?

When is the draft, I might be able to join if MIM didn't and I can make the draft.

I did not, so fire away.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Barrister on August 10, 2009, 07:06:02 PM
I'm still going to join up.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 10, 2009, 07:24:47 PM
Quote from: Barrister on August 10, 2009, 06:49:58 PM
The better question is why would you watch a boring pre-season game when there was a regular-season CFL game on at the same time?   :huh:
The NFL game is less likely to be a blowout, and tends to have a higher level of play, even with the backups in.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: katmai on August 10, 2009, 08:04:07 PM
only one spot left open so somebody better join!
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on August 10, 2009, 08:06:27 PM
Quote from: katmai on August 10, 2009, 08:04:07 PM
only one spot left open so somebody better join!
When's the draft?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on August 10, 2009, 08:14:26 PM
Quote from: Valmy on August 09, 2009, 10:26:30 PM
Colt McCoy will be the next Longhorn hope to finally produce an NFL QB after Bobby Layne.

This is why Texas fans will always suffer.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on August 10, 2009, 08:18:22 PM
Hey Neil, another Ravens LB is born.  Move over, Jameel McClain.

QuoteEllerbe another undrafted Ravens gem
Rookie linebacker has caught attention of veterans


Mike Preston
August 9, 2009

On draft weekend in April, University of Georgia linebacker Dannell Ellerbe kept watching the clock and waiting for the phone to ring. No NFL team called during the two days, as each hour passed slowly.

A lot of teams called shortly after the draft was over, but a dream and reportedly $2,000 more in bonus money persuaded Ellerbe to sign a free-agent contract with the Ravens.

And now the fight is on.

"I just want to prove myself and show everybody that I'm good enough to play in the NFL," Ellerbe said. "It's a personal matter."

Something certainly has Ellerbe stirred up and motivated. It usually takes rookies a few practices to catch on to the speed of the NFL game, including practices, but Ellerbe has been jacking up running backs from Day 1.

He has been so impressive that Pro Bowl outside linebacker Terrell Suggs doesn't call him by his name, but his jersey number. That's usually reserved for players like Suggs, and No. 52, Ray Lewis.

"No. 48, right from the beginning, you could see that he had talent and came here to hit," Suggs said. "He has been playing well. He has a good feel for the game, and he swarms to the ball. A lot of rookies come here but don't move well at first because they don't know where they're going. No. 48 never had that problem."


Ellerbe began training camp on the third team, but with starting inside linebacker Tavares Gooden in and out of the lineup with injuries, Ellerbe has split time on both the first and second teams.

When training camp opened at the end of July, Gooden was expected to challenge Jameel McClain for a starting inside position next to Lewis. Move over. Ellerbe is in the mix.

"The fact is that he has been a standout player for us in training camp, and it's going to be a great battle," said Eric DeCosta, the Ravens' director of player personnel. "We're working him with different personnel groups trying to get him acclimated with the system. He has all the physical ability in the world, and now we're all trying to put him in position to make plays."

Ellerbe, 6 feet 1, isn't a typical Ravens inside linebacker. The Ravens prefer their linebackers sleek so they can run and cover a lot of ground. Ellerbe is more of a thumper. In football terms, he's more of a downhill type who attacks the line of scrimmage.

"He is very strong at the point of attack," DeCosta said. "He has to shore some things up, obviously, but with his aggressiveness, demeanor, reckless style, violence and heavy hands, you have to believe that he could become a really good player in this league."

Right now, here's what you're thinking: If he was that good, then why wasn't he drafted?

One reason is off-the-field issues. In 2006, when Ellerbe was 20, he was suspended for three games after being arrested and charged with a DUI, underage possession of alcohol, theft of automobile and giving false information to police.

He also had a serious knee injury that cut his playing time as a senior, dropping his tackles from a team-leading 93 as a junior to 33 in 2008.

"There might have been some things he did in college when he was young that probably hurt him," DeCosta said. "There are also some guys who just slip through the cracks like a Bart Scott or Priest Holmes. He is an aggressive kid, very explosive and has been outstanding for us."

The Ravens thought Ellerbe was worth drafting, but didn't want to use another pick on a linebacker after taking Utah's Paul Kruger in the second round and Texas Christian's Jason Phillips in the fifth.

But they pounced on Ellerbe as soon as the draft was over. It was surprising that Ellerbe signed with the Ravens, a team loaded with young linebackers, such as Gooden, McClain, Prescott Burgess, Antwan Barnes, Phillips and Kruger.

"We always practiced hard at Georgia, and you always play hard in the SEC," Ellerbe said. "It was like a blessing to sign here. Even though I didn't get drafted, I still can come here and learn from the best. It's like a perfect fit.

"You have guys like Ray Lewis and Terrell Suggs, they have helped me. In the coaches' room, Ray is always telling me what we did right and what we did wrong. I'm beginning to become comfortable with this defense in and out."

The next step for Ellerbe is seeing the game under real playing conditions. He knows there is practice speed and then there is preseason game speed. The NFL has two more notches, one for regular season and another for the postseason.

Ellerbe isn't afraid. He has matured through some tough times on the field and off.

"That draft weekend was one of the worst times in my life," he said. "I don't think I'm over it now, I'm just dealing with it better. I won't be over it until I prove myself in the NFL."
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: sbr on August 10, 2009, 08:48:07 PM
Quote from: katmai on August 10, 2009, 08:04:07 PM
only one spot left open so somebody better join!

I would join but would like to know when the draft is before I commit; I don't like having my team auto-picked if I can't be there.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: ulmont on August 10, 2009, 08:51:25 PM
Quote from: sbr on August 10, 2009, 08:48:07 PM
Quote from: katmai on August 10, 2009, 08:04:07 PM
only one spot left open so somebody better join!

I would join but would like to know when the draft is before I commit; I don't like having my team auto-picked if I can't be there.

I think it's an auto-pick no matter what, you just choose the priority order.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Barrister on August 10, 2009, 09:22:12 PM
I have no idea what my yahoo ID is.   :lol:

Can anyone remember?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Sophie Scholl on August 10, 2009, 09:51:30 PM
Quote from: Barrister on August 10, 2009, 09:22:12 PM
I have no idea what my yahoo ID is.   :lol:

Can anyone remember?
Yukonlawguy
:thumbsup:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: sbr on August 11, 2009, 12:22:27 AM
Quote from: ulmont on August 10, 2009, 08:51:25 PM
Quote from: sbr on August 10, 2009, 08:48:07 PM
Quote from: katmai on August 10, 2009, 08:04:07 PM
only one spot left open so somebody better join!

I would join but would like to know when the draft is before I commit; I don't like having my team auto-picked if I can't be there.

I think it's an auto-pick no matter what, you just choose the priority order.

If this is true I will take the last spot, if it is still open.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: katmai on August 11, 2009, 12:26:58 AM
It was reverted back to autodraft when last team joined, i'm moved it back to the live draft of 5pm EDT on Aug 23rd (Sunday)
And if you can't be there you can at least set your preferences for players and hope to luck out. :P
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: sbr on August 11, 2009, 12:35:30 AM
Quote from: katmai on August 11, 2009, 12:26:58 AM
It was reverted back to autodraft when last team joined, i'm moved it back to the live draft of 5pm EDT on Aug 23rd (Sunday)
And if you can't be there you can at least set your preferences for players and hope to luck out. :P

Perfect I have another fantasy draft the day before (EUOT) but nothing that day.

I am in for sure.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Barrister on August 11, 2009, 12:55:09 AM
Quote from: katmai on August 11, 2009, 12:26:58 AM
It was reverted back to autodraft when last team joined, i'm moved it back to the live draft of 5pm EDT on Aug 23rd (Sunday)
And if you can't be there you can at least set your preferences for players and hope to luck out. :P

So is there room for one or two more teams?   :huh:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: katmai on August 11, 2009, 12:59:30 AM
the league was set for 20 teams from last year...which a few people complained was too much, so i reduced it to 18.

Before rocky joined the other day we had 16 teams, his team made 17.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Sophie Scholl on August 11, 2009, 01:18:30 AM
I vote for 20.  It's more fun dammit!  Plus, if we have interested people, why block them out of a Languish/KAPland tradition?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: katmai on August 11, 2009, 01:40:59 AM
Quote from: Judas Iscariot on August 11, 2009, 01:18:30 AM
I vote for 20.  It's more fun dammit!  Plus, if we have interested people, why block them out of a Languish/KAPland tradition?

that is my personal feelings on matter.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Liep on August 11, 2009, 01:42:51 AM
Quote from: katmai on August 11, 2009, 12:26:58 AM
5pm EDT on Aug 23rd (Sunday)

Is 23 in CEST?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Liep on August 11, 2009, 01:44:10 AM
And 20 teams is good. It's always fun to see who gets stuck with a RB that doesn't produce and is then left with 2nd string backups. :P Damn you Cadillac! :(
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: katmai on August 11, 2009, 02:00:08 AM
Quote from: Liep on August 11, 2009, 01:42:51 AM
Quote from: katmai on August 11, 2009, 12:26:58 AM
5pm EDT on Aug 23rd (Sunday)

Is 23 in CEST?

sounds about right.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Strix on August 11, 2009, 03:36:21 AM
Hey, why did I get left off LFFL again?

Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Grey Fox on August 11, 2009, 06:44:45 AM
You didn't show interest?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Strix on August 11, 2009, 10:02:46 AM
Quote from: Grey Fox on August 11, 2009, 06:44:45 AM
You didn't show interest?

I didn't see a post with an ID and password to show interest?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Liep on August 11, 2009, 10:18:24 AM
Quote from: katmai on July 29, 2009, 02:26:00 AM
League has been created, all folks interested please pm me or post in this thread again and i'll send info to join...

so let's see if Foxy can defend his title the lucky little quacker.

Though, I still count 1 or 3 spots.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Strix on August 11, 2009, 10:25:34 AM
Well, if any spots left than could someone send me ID and password?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on August 12, 2009, 12:56:20 PM
Cushing sprained his knee. Out until at least the third preseason game.  Yay.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Barrister on August 12, 2009, 12:59:43 PM
I am definitely in and will register tonight.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: JacobL on August 13, 2009, 07:52:58 PM
rotoworld

QuoteESPN.com's Chris Mortensen reports the Eagles have signed Michael Vick to a two-year contract. Vick's agent has confirmed the deal.
Despite their training camp injuries, the Eagles are gunning for a Super Bowl title this season. ESPN's Jon Gruden suggested that they see Vick as a "missing piece," with offensive guru Andy Reid finding creative ways to utilize his talent. The Dungy/Vick team placed a high priority on stability, and the Joe Banner/Tom Heckert/Reid trio provide plenty of ballast. Vick is no threat to Donovan McNabb's starting job, but it may be an indication that Kevin Kolb's knee injury is more serious than originally believed.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 13, 2009, 07:57:12 PM
Well, given McNabb's tendency to get hurt or require benching, it's important that they have a better backup than Kevin Kolb.  Then again, Vick might not be that good anymore.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Grey Fox on August 13, 2009, 08:07:18 PM
Eagles vs Pats.

Gawd, that's awful :x
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Grey Fox on August 13, 2009, 08:10:03 PM
Also, congratulations on the Eagles offence fucking up their 1st play :lol:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 13, 2009, 08:10:43 PM
Quote from: Grey Fox on August 13, 2009, 08:07:18 PM
Eagles vs Pats.

Gawd, that's awful :x
Since Kevin Kolb is pretty much done, he should do the NFL a favour and throw an errant pass through Tom Brady's heart.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on August 13, 2009, 09:19:10 PM
Come to think of it, Philly signing Michael Vick makes sense from a PR standpoint:  after all, these fans are the ones that threw batteries at Santa, cheered when opponents get injured, and had the only stadium with an actual jail and magistrate in it.
Of course they're not going to have to have a problem with a dogkilling Federal convict.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 13, 2009, 09:21:58 PM
At least the NFL has it's priorities straight, even if the justice system doesn't.  Vick is only suspended until Week 6, whereas Stallworth got the season for his homicide.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on August 13, 2009, 09:36:38 PM
Brady looked so good.   :ccr
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Vince on August 13, 2009, 09:51:00 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on August 13, 2009, 09:36:38 PM
Brady looked so good.   :ccr

I saw him on Entourage last week and it looked like the fire was gone. The way he delivered those lines....no emotion whatsoever.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Alcibiades on August 13, 2009, 10:02:58 PM
Quote from: Neil on August 13, 2009, 09:21:58 PM
At least the NFL has it's priorities straight, even if the justice system doesn't.  Vick is only suspended until Week 6, whereas Stallworth got the season for his homicide.

:lol:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on August 13, 2009, 10:06:37 PM
Quote from: Vince on August 13, 2009, 09:51:00 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on August 13, 2009, 09:36:38 PM
Brady looked so good.   :ccr

I saw him on Entourage last week and it looked like the fire was gone. The way he delivered those lines....no emotion whatsoever.

He looked pretty firey to me out on the field.
Brady went 10 of 15 for 100 yards with the two touchdowns and an interception and he was pretty upset with himself when made that mistake.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Valmy on August 13, 2009, 10:09:48 PM
Thank Hod Vick did not end up with the Redskins.  My nightmare: averted.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on August 13, 2009, 10:15:46 PM
Quote from: Valmy on August 13, 2009, 10:09:48 PM
Thank Hod Vick did not end up with the Redskins.  My nightmare: averted.

New nightmare, Vick makes the decisive play in an Eagles win over the Redskins in the playoffs.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: HisMajestyBOB on August 13, 2009, 10:26:28 PM
Oh God, I just looked up the stats on the Redskins-Ravens game. I'm glad I didn't see that travesty with my own eyes.:bleeding:


QuoteThank Hod Vick did not end up with the Redskins.  My nightmare: averted.

There is that, yes.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Barrister on August 13, 2009, 11:15:11 PM
Quote from: Barrister on August 12, 2009, 12:59:43 PM
I am definitely in and will register tonight.

Frozen Yukoners are registered.   :bowler:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on August 14, 2009, 04:54:00 AM
Quote from: HisMajestyBOB on August 13, 2009, 10:26:28 PM
Oh God, I just looked up the stats on the Redskins-Ravens game. I'm glad I didn't see that travesty with my own eyes.:bleeding:

Yes, the Foreskins looked that bad.  It was beautiful.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Caliga on August 14, 2009, 05:39:23 AM
:bleeding:

I definitely have to ditch the Eagles now and decide on another team.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Grey Fox on August 14, 2009, 06:12:20 AM
I like the Eagles now that it's not the entirely all the McNabb show.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 14, 2009, 07:11:33 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on August 14, 2009, 04:54:00 AM
Quote from: HisMajestyBOB on August 13, 2009, 10:26:28 PM
Oh God, I just looked up the stats on the Redskins-Ravens game. I'm glad I didn't see that travesty with my own eyes.:bleeding:

Yes, the Foreskins looked that bad.  It was beautiful.
Now they've set the expectation that the offence will gain 500 yards in the regular season.  Repeatedly.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on August 14, 2009, 07:45:09 AM
I hope Suzy Kolber is safe after the MNF Steelers game.  :(
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Caliga on August 14, 2009, 07:55:34 AM
Quote from: Grey Fox on August 14, 2009, 06:12:20 AM
I like the Eagles now that it's not the entirely all the McNabb show.
McNabb reminds me of Randall Cunningham.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Valmy on August 14, 2009, 08:02:13 AM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on August 13, 2009, 10:15:46 PM
New nightmare, Vick makes the decisive play in an Eagles win over the Redskins in the playoffs.

The Redskins are going to make the playoffs?! :w00t: :yeah:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 14, 2009, 08:43:56 AM
Quote from: Valmy on August 14, 2009, 08:02:13 AM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on August 13, 2009, 10:15:46 PM
New nightmare, Vick makes the decisive play in an Eagles win over the Redskins in the playoffs.

The Redskins are going to make the playoffs?! :w00t: :yeah:
It does seem pretty unlikely, but those wildcard spots in the NFC are wide open.  Unfortunately, the Redskins are playing in a division that's fairly good, what with the Giants, Eagles and pre-December Cowboys, and so it's pretty unlikely that they'll contend.  Not impossible though, especially if one of the Redskins QBs turns out to actually be good.

Still, getting shutout by the Ravens in preseason is not a good sign.  I mean, losing isn't so bad, especially since backups and guys who are going to get cut play most of the game anyways.  But getting shut out?  That means that nobody made a play.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: sbr on August 14, 2009, 08:47:43 AM
Quote from: Neil on August 14, 2009, 08:43:56 AM
Quote from: Valmy on August 14, 2009, 08:02:13 AM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on August 13, 2009, 10:15:46 PM
New nightmare, Vick makes the decisive play in an Eagles win over the Redskins in the playoffs.

The Redskins are going to make the playoffs?! :w00t: :yeah:
It does seem pretty unlikely, but those wildcard spots in the NFC are wide open.  Unfortunately, the Redskins are playing in a division that's fairly good, what with the Giants, Eagles and pre-December Cowboys, and so it's pretty unlikely that they'll contend.  Not impossible though, especially if one of the Redskins QBs turns out to actually be good.

Still, getting shutout by the Ravens in preseason is not a good sign.  I mean, losing isn't so bad, especially since backups and guys who are going to get cut play most of the game anyways.  But getting shut out?  That means that nobody made a play.

The Lions went 4-0 last preseason, there is absolutely nothing to be taken from any of it.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Caliga on August 14, 2009, 08:49:09 AM
Quote from: sbr on August 14, 2009, 08:47:43 AMThe Lions went 4-0 last preseason, there is absolutely nothing to be taken from any of it.
Their opponents all probably used their scrimmage teams against the Lions.  Why bother playing your starters?  You'd have nothing useful to learn from a Lions game. :)
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: sbr on August 14, 2009, 09:09:24 AM
Quote from: Caliga on August 14, 2009, 08:49:09 AM
Quote from: sbr on August 14, 2009, 08:47:43 AMThe Lions went 4-0 last preseason, there is absolutely nothing to be taken from any of it.
Their opponents all probably used their scrimmage teams against the Lions.  Why bother playing your starters?  You'd have nothing useful to learn from a Lions game. :)

As far as I can remember no one thought the Lions were going to be that bad last year; I don't think people expected them to compete for a playoff spot again but no one except my brother, the biggest pessimist in the world saw that coming.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Valmy on August 14, 2009, 09:16:49 AM
Quote from: Neil on August 14, 2009, 08:43:56 AM
It does seem pretty unlikely, but those wildcard spots in the NFC are wide open.  Unfortunately, the Redskins are playing in a division that's fairly good, what with the Giants, Eagles and pre-December Cowboys, and so it's pretty unlikely that they'll contend.  Not impossible though, especially if one of the Redskins QBs turns out to actually be good.

Still, getting shutout by the Ravens in preseason is not a good sign.  I mean, losing isn't so bad, especially since backups and guys who are going to get cut play most of the game anyways.  But getting shut out?  That means that nobody made a play.

The Redskins are not going anywhere with Jason Campbell at QB.  Actually the whole offense has all the explosive power of very very wet gunpowder.

If they win it will because the defense has an amazing season.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 14, 2009, 09:18:16 AM
Quote from: sbr on August 14, 2009, 08:47:43 AM
The Lions went 4-0 last preseason, there is absolutely nothing to be taken from any of it.
Of course there is.  What that tells me is that the Lions players should probably all be backups.  It also tells me that the quarterback position is a big problem for the Lions, as the preseason is much more forgiving for that position.

At any rate, the Lions going 4-0 in the preseason last year does nothing to reject my assertion, that getting shut out in the preseason bodes poorly for a team.  It's not definitive, and on any given Thursday night and all that, but it's pretty bad when nobody on either side of the ball can make a big play, all the way down the 80-something guys you have at camp.

For example, in last year's preseason, two teams got shut out:  The Chiefs and the Bengals.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 14, 2009, 10:47:28 AM
Jesus Christ, Jeff Lurie is a douche.  Signs a guy to his team, and then goes on TV and self-righteously bashes him for a half hour.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 14, 2009, 05:56:59 PM
Tonight is the first game that the Living Legend, Kyle Boller, will be playing his first game as a Ram.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on August 14, 2009, 10:06:55 PM
Goodness.  Kyle Orton looks awful so far.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Sophie Scholl on August 14, 2009, 10:11:18 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on August 14, 2009, 10:06:55 PM
Goodness.  Kyle Orton looks awful so far.
I thought he looked good outside of the redzone.  I'm so torn on him.  I loved him when he was with the Bears, but now I have to hate him that he's a Bronco. :(
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on August 14, 2009, 10:36:42 PM
Quote from: Judas Iscariot on August 14, 2009, 10:11:18 PM
I thought he looked good outside of the redzone.  I'm so torn on him.  I loved him when he was with the Bears, but now I have to hate him that he's a Bronco. :(

He just keeps (or kept now, since Simms is in) throwing picks. 
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on August 15, 2009, 06:23:56 AM
Quote from: Caliga on August 14, 2009, 07:55:34 AM
Quote from: Grey Fox on August 14, 2009, 06:12:20 AM
I like the Eagles now that it's not the entirely all the McNabb show.
McNabb reminds me of Randall Cunningham.

Then you have a shitty memory.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 15, 2009, 07:02:37 AM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on August 14, 2009, 10:06:55 PM
Goodness.  Kyle Orton looks awful so far.
The Broncos knew what they were doing when they traded Cutler.  Orton is a QB who is used to protection and will make the occasional play for you, but is unlikely to take the team on his back.  With Denver's depleted offence and terrible defence, that's not going to work like it did with the Bears.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Vince on August 15, 2009, 07:19:51 AM
Well after last night's Jets preseason game much as I hate to admit it Sanchez has the edge over Clemens at QB.  Rex Ryan continues to turn the Jets into last year's version of the Ravens with a rookie QB, 3-headed beast at RB and improved defense. 
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on August 15, 2009, 09:42:01 AM
Quote from: Vince on August 15, 2009, 07:19:51 AM
Rex Ryan continues to turn the Jets into last year's version of the Ravens with a rookie QB, 3-headed beast at RB and improved defense.

There's only one difference: bad Jets mojo.  J-E-S-T JEST JEST JEST
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 15, 2009, 09:47:35 AM
Mind you, playing the Rams is a little different from playing a team that isn't horrible.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Strix on August 15, 2009, 11:19:50 AM
Quote from: Neil on August 15, 2009, 09:47:35 AM
Mind you, playing the Rams is a little different from playing a team that isn't horrible.

So, it wasn't that much difference from scrimmaging themselves?  :P
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 15, 2009, 11:54:32 AM
Quote from: Strix on August 15, 2009, 11:19:50 AM
Quote from: Neil on August 15, 2009, 09:47:35 AM
Mind you, playing the Rams is a little different from playing a team that isn't horrible.

So, it wasn't that much difference from scrimmaging themselves?  :P
Ouch.  I dunno, it seems to me that the Jets are part of that middle ground of teams that are going to win a respectable number of games, but aren't going to the playoffs.  They should be able to secure third place in their division.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Strix on August 15, 2009, 12:26:42 PM
Quote from: Neil on August 15, 2009, 11:54:32 AM
Ouch.  I dunno, it seems to me that the Jets are part of that middle ground of teams that are going to win a respectable number of games, but aren't going to the playoffs.  They should be able to secure third place in their division.

It will be an interesting battle for 2nd to last in that Division. Thomas Jones is coming off his best season as a Pro but he is turning 31 in a week or so. Will we see the 3.6 or 4.5 yards per carry guy? And with Washington holding out does that mean Thomas gets ground down even more with carries? And even if Washington signs soon will he even be effective as most hold out RB's seem to have a lot of injuries as a result of missing the preseason workouts. Throw a rookie QB without any outstanding wideouts in to the mix and you have a recipe for potentially something horrific. Oh, did I forget to mention a rookie Coach as well?

On the upside, I think the Jets will have a much better defense.  I think Ryan will bring toughness and a nasty character to the team with the help of the key defections from the Ravens.

Buffalo is of course the wild card in the equation. Their defense should be good. The major issue is Lynch getting suspended. It might help or hurt the team. It could help them by letting Owens be more of the offense at the beginning which could also backfire once Lynch returns. I think Rhodes and Jackson can replace Lynch well until his return especially with Buffalo switching to a no huddle style offense. Jauron is under pressure to win. If he along with his coaches can stop losing their usual 2-3 games a season because of their handling of the game than Buffalo should be a cold stone lock to finish at least 3rd in the Division.

On the downside (or upside if you aren't a Buffalo fan), the over/under is game 7 for Owens to throw Edwards and the coaching staff under the bus than back up over Jauron's still twitching corpse.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on August 15, 2009, 04:12:22 PM
 :lol: Well #83 won't be making the Lions roster.  Stafford hit him in the hands twice on that drive (including his first NFL pass, a deep-ish throw) and both times he dropped the pass. 

E:  Hey he finally caught one!  E2: Aaaannd....another drop.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: sbr on August 15, 2009, 06:06:25 PM
Owens is always good his first year on a new team, and with a one year contract I don't see him throwing anyone under the bus this year at all.  The Bills should be pretty good if Edwards can do anything.  I see them porbably finishing second in that division, which should put them in the playoffs.  The Jets will probably give them a run but I can't see them doing it this year.  I see a freefall for the 'Phins this year.

EDIT: This is all without looking at the teams' schedules, just my "feelings" about the quality of the teams.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on August 15, 2009, 06:56:41 PM
I expect to see the Bills lose plenty of games with the score 38-35.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on August 15, 2009, 06:58:24 PM
Ugh...the weather is supposedly pretty shitty in Kansas City.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on August 15, 2009, 09:25:11 PM
 :lol:  Bad Rex spotted.

"Fuck it I'm going deep" *throws to no one*
*fumbles for no reason on the next play*

Ahaha the punter fucked it all up, but just picked up the ball and ran for a first down.  And the Rex Grossman experiment seems to already be over.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: sbr on August 15, 2009, 09:30:50 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on August 15, 2009, 09:25:11 PM
:lol:  Bad Rex spotted.

"Fuck it I'm going deep" *throws to no one*
*fumbles for no reason on the next play*

Ahaha the punter fucked it all up, but just picked up the ball and ran for a first down.  And the Rex Grossman experiment seems to already be over.

:o

Who is Sexy Rex playing for?  I didn't know anyone signed him.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on August 15, 2009, 09:31:49 PM
Quote from: sbr on August 15, 2009, 09:30:50 PM
:o

Who is Sexy Rex playing for?  I didn't know anyone signed him.

The Texans picked him up to be their third string guy, but he really stunk the place up in this first preseason game.  Three snaps and Kubiak benched him.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 15, 2009, 10:45:51 PM
Quote from: Strix on August 15, 2009, 12:26:42 PM
Quote from: Neil on August 15, 2009, 11:54:32 AM
Ouch.  I dunno, it seems to me that the Jets are part of that middle ground of teams that are going to win a respectable number of games, but aren't going to the playoffs.  They should be able to secure third place in their division.

It will be an interesting battle for 2nd to last in that Division. Thomas Jones is coming off his best season as a Pro but he is turning 31 in a week or so. Will we see the 3.6 or 4.5 yards per carry guy? And with Washington holding out does that mean Thomas gets ground down even more with carries? And even if Washington signs soon will he even be effective as most hold out RB's seem to have a lot of injuries as a result of missing the preseason workouts. Throw a rookie QB without any outstanding wideouts in to the mix and you have a recipe for potentially something horrific. Oh, did I forget to mention a rookie Coach as well?

On the upside, I think the Jets will have a much better defense.  I think Ryan will bring toughness and a nasty character to the team with the help of the key defections from the Ravens.

Buffalo is of course the wild card in the equation. Their defense should be good. The major issue is Lynch getting suspended. It might help or hurt the team. It could help them by letting Owens be more of the offense at the beginning which could also backfire once Lynch returns. I think Rhodes and Jackson can replace Lynch well until his return especially with Buffalo switching to a no huddle style offense. Jauron is under pressure to win. If he along with his coaches can stop losing their usual 2-3 games a season because of their handling of the game than Buffalo should be a cold stone lock to finish at least 3rd in the Division.

On the downside (or upside if you aren't a Buffalo fan), the over/under is game 7 for Owens to throw Edwards and the coaching staff under the bus than back up over Jauron's still twitching corpse.
Jauron is an idiot.  Miami and the Faggotriots will fight it out for first, the Jets will be third and Buffalo will be in the basement.  Buffalo has an alright defence, a good RB, a passable QB and a good WR tandem, but they have the second-worst coach in the NFL right now (Wade Phillips is total shit).  And that's why they'll continue to lose those 2-3 games a year.  It's not like Jauron has never been under pressure to win before.  It's just that he can't win.  He makes Rich Kotite look like John fucking Madden.

The real wildcard is Chad Pennington.  If he stays healthy and plays within himself like last year, Miami is a force to be reckoned with in that division.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Vince on August 17, 2009, 08:37:31 PM
Buddy Ryan would be proud. 

http://nfl.fanhouse.com/2009/08/17/sources-raiders-coach-tom-cable-punched-assistant-during-alterc/#cont (http://nfl.fanhouse.com/2009/08/17/sources-raiders-coach-tom-cable-punched-assistant-during-alterc/#cont)

QuoteOakland Raiders head coach Tom Cable punched defensive assistant Randy Hanson in the jaw during an Aug. 5 altercation at the team's training camp headquarters at the Napa Valley Marriott, two sources told FanHouse.

National Football Post first reported Monday that Hanson, a third-year assistant who is in his first season with the team under the title "assistant coach-defense," had been hit by another member of the coaching staff, but did not specify the attacker.

Two NFL sources have told FanHouse that the assailant was Cable and "that Hanson never saw it coming."

Neither Hanson nor the coach who threw the punch were identified in a Napa, Calif., police report taken Aug. 6 at Queen of the Valley Hospital. But one well-placed NFL source told FanHouse of the attacker: "It's a well-known coach. Very well-known."

Pressed to confirm the identity of the attacker, the source said, "It was Cable who hit him."

Cable said after the Raiders' Monday afternoon practice in Napa: "It's an internal issue. I'm not going to comment on that." Bay Area reporters sent out Tweets saying follow up questions were cut off by a Raiders official.

Earlier, as players took the practice field, they were heard chanting "Cable Bumaye!" (Cable Kill Him) -- a reference to the infamous chant made famous by boxing fans in Zaire when Muhammad Ali knocked out George Foreman in the 8th round during the Rumble in the Jungle fight in 1974.

According to Napa Police Lt. Brian McGovern, police followed procedure in responding to the downtown Napa hospital when Hanson arrived to receive treatment for what was described as an injured jaw. X-rays were taken. The results are not known, although one NFL source told FanHouse Hanson sustained a fractured jaw as a result of the punch.

Hanson told police the alleged assault took place at the Raiders' training camp site the day before, but he refused to name the attacker, which is hindering a police investigation into whether misdemeanor or even felony assault charges may be filed. A jaw fracture could warrant felony charges, but the fact the victim is unwilling to pursue the matter criminally is not surprising, given the cloistered nature of the tight-knit NFL coaching fraternity.

The police report is not public record, McGovern said, because of concern for privacy rights of the alleged victim.

"The victim didn't even want any police action taken," McGovern told FanHouse, "but we were following hospital policy that authorities be contacted in cases where there may have been an assault."

McGovern said Napa Police consider the matter closed at this point, "unless we are re-contacted by the victim, and the victim changes their mind that they want us to follow through and pursue an investigation. At this point we're not doing anything else with it."

Another NFL source told FanHouse that Hanson was in the middle of a conversation with defensive coordinator John Marshall when the alleged attack occurred.

Hanson previously served under former Raiders coach Lane Kiffin as an assistant defensive backs coach. The two clashed famously in Sept. 2008 when Hanson was suspended by Kiffin after the defensive assistant openly questioned the Raiders' game plan following a 41-14 season-opening loss to the then-Mike Shanahan-coached Denver Broncos.

"It's a good thing that Shanahan didn't have our players," Hanson reportedly blurted out in the presence of other coaches, "or else he would have beaten us 1,000-0."

Kiffin suspended Hanson for five days, causing a rift among a divided Raiders coaching staff that caused owner Al Davis to intervene. By that time, Kiffin and former defensive coordinator Rob Ryan were openly battling over defensive philosophy. By Week 1 of the '08 season, Davis already was compiling a dossier to document reasons to dismiss Kiffin. The Hanson incident was one more page for the report.

Asked about the Hanson outburst, Kiffin said last September, "Randy had some personal issues going on. Randy still did some work for us, but he spent some time at home to get some things straight in his personal life."

Raiders senior executive John Herrera told the National Football Post that Cable would address the latest Hanson controversy following the team's practice on Sunday, but that did not happen.

The Raiders have a single 3:30 p.m. PT practice Monday, after which Cable is expected to answer questions about the alleged assault.

Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on August 17, 2009, 09:47:00 PM
Damn Vince, looks like it's more than "one source" who say he broke his jaw!

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/08/17/the-2009-raiders-cable-bumaye/

QuoteThe 2009 Raiders: "Cable, Bumaye!"
Posted by Gregg Rosenthal on August 17, 2009 8:52 PM ET
To no one's surprise, Raiders head coach Tom Cable failed to shed much light on his alleged assault of defensive assistant Randy Hanson in comments to the press Monday night.

According to the Oakland Tribune's Jerry McDonald, Cable said, "It's an internal matter and that's all I'm going to say."

Cable repeated it two more times just in case reporters thought he might crack.

Oakland's players, however, said it all with their actions before practice started.  The team reportedly started chanting "Cable, Bumaye!" while in warmups.

The hilarious and impressive reference is to Muhammad Ali's fight with George Foreman in Zaire, where the pro-Ali crowd's chant can roughly be translated to "Kill him!"

It's a safe bet that some enterprising Raiders fan is manufacturing T-shirts as we speak with the phrase on it.  Or at least someone should be.  [Editor's note:  Sorry, Gregg . . . we've already diverted your salary for the month to the "Orton Hears A Boo" bumper stickers.]

The team may be finding humor in the situation -- heck, it might become a rallying cry -- but Cable could face serious repercussions from the incident.  The chant certainly won't dispel multiple reports that Cable broke Hanson's jaw.

One also has to wonder about Hanson's future with the team.  He didn't hear the chant because he was the only Raiders coach absent from practice Monday.

When Hanson hears what happened, he might not enjoy the "Cable, Bumaye!" chant as much as we do.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on August 18, 2009, 06:57:49 AM
The Sex Cannon managed to pull a hammy during his crappy three snap preseason debut with the Texans the other day, and is out 4 to 5 weeks.

The Texans went ahead and signed a different third string guy.  :P

e:  They also released their uniform combos for this year, and they haven't given up on the red/red ketchup bottle look just yet.  They've also decided to bust out with white/white against the Jets, and blue/blue against the Colts.  How many uniform combos can you use in a year??  Houston, just at a glance, is going with...five. 

I wonder if it would be possible to just have some different combo for each game.  Fuck it.  Get some lime green in there.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: derspiess on August 18, 2009, 09:21:47 AM
Quote from: Neil on August 15, 2009, 10:45:51 PM
The real wildcard is Chad Pennington.  If he stays healthy and plays within himself like last year, Miami is a force to be reckoned with in that division.

I hope to see Miami do more wildcat, particularly now that they have Pat White :)
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Valmy on August 18, 2009, 09:48:31 AM
Unfortunately for Miami this is Chad Pennington's year for a major injury.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on August 18, 2009, 10:46:41 AM
Fucking Farve, give it up! <_<
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadImmortalMan on August 18, 2009, 10:56:07 AM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on August 18, 2009, 10:46:41 AM
Fucking Farve, give it up! <_<

I heard on the radio on the way to work today that Favre was in a jet belonging to the Vikes.  :rolleyes:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on August 18, 2009, 10:59:40 AM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on August 18, 2009, 10:56:07 AM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on August 18, 2009, 10:46:41 AM
Fucking Farve, give it up! <_<

I heard on the radio on the way to work today that Favre was in a jet belonging to the Vikes.  :rolleyes:
Pending a physical he's signing.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4406963
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Grey Fox on August 18, 2009, 11:04:32 AM
:yeah:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadImmortalMan on August 18, 2009, 11:19:37 AM
I guess since Vick was taken they had to do something.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on August 18, 2009, 11:21:50 AM
Rosenfels patented "Helicopter" sneak attack incoming.  Favre's career will finally be ended.

Edit:  Really though, wasn't Sage actually doing pretty well up there so far?  As in "won't set the record for INTs" well?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Barrister on August 18, 2009, 11:41:55 AM
I for one am ready to become a Favre fan.   :cool:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Valmy on August 18, 2009, 11:47:21 AM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on August 18, 2009, 10:59:40 AM
Pending a physical he's signing.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4406963

That is hilarious :lmfao:

Crazy old interception throwin dude.  I could actually respect Favre's desire to keep playing if he stopped doing the attention whoring fake retirement every year.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Valmy on August 18, 2009, 11:47:46 AM
Quote from: Barrister on August 18, 2009, 11:41:55 AM
I for one am ready to become a Favre fan.   :cool:

Yeah well we will see how you feel after the first of his patented soul crushing INTs.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Vince on August 18, 2009, 01:46:30 PM
Quote from: Valmy on August 18, 2009, 11:47:46 AM
Quote from: Barrister on August 18, 2009, 11:41:55 AM
I for one am ready to become a Favre fan.   :cool:

Yeah well we will see how you feel after the first of his patented soul crushing INTs.

I miss my soul  :cry:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Barrister on August 18, 2009, 02:58:00 PM
Quote from: Valmy on August 18, 2009, 11:47:46 AM
Quote from: Barrister on August 18, 2009, 11:41:55 AM
I for one am ready to become a Favre fan.   :cool:

Yeah well we will see how you feel after the first of his patented soul crushing INTs.

Dude - the alternatives are Tavaris Jackson and Sage Rosenfels.

I think I can put up with Favre's occasional INTs as long as he can actually play.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Valmy on August 18, 2009, 03:01:20 PM
Quote from: Barrister on August 18, 2009, 02:58:00 PM
I think I can put up with Favre's occasional INTs as long as he can actually play.

Famous last words.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: derspiess on August 18, 2009, 03:08:49 PM
Quote from: Valmy on August 18, 2009, 09:48:31 AM
Unfortunately for Miami this is Chad Pennington's year for a major injury.

Yeah, it will be unfortunate, since neither Henne nor Pat White are ready to fill a starting role.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Valmy on August 18, 2009, 03:10:02 PM
Quote from: derspiess on August 18, 2009, 03:08:49 PM
Yeah, it will be unfortunate, since neither Henne nor Pat White are ready to fill a starting role.

Well maybe this will be the year he breaks the trend.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Barrister on August 18, 2009, 04:37:53 PM
Quote from: Valmy on August 18, 2009, 03:01:20 PM
Quote from: Barrister on August 18, 2009, 02:58:00 PM
I think I can put up with Favre's occasional INTs as long as he can actually play.

Famous last words.

We shall see.

All I know is that he has to be better than the Sage/Tavaris option.  I'm not guaranteeing they'll win the division or anything - but this gives them the best chance of doing it.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on August 18, 2009, 04:38:49 PM
Jeff George: Available.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Sophie Scholl on August 18, 2009, 04:53:55 PM
Quote from: Barrister on August 18, 2009, 04:37:53 PM
All I know is that he has to be better than the Sage/Tavaris option.  I'm not guaranteeing they'll win the division or anything - but this gives them the best chance of doing it.
Till he falls apart in December and drags your team out of contention because he refuses to be benched.  Beeb, look at the Jets last year, do you really want that? 
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on August 18, 2009, 05:08:22 PM
Why in the world would you want some old dude "gunslinging" (ESPN speak for "throwing picks") the ball all over the field when you've got a guy like Adrian Peterson and a monster defense (or at least the Dline is really good)?  Rosenfels and Jackson can both hand the ball off and throw the occasional pass to keep the D honest.  You don't need Brett Favre for that.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Barrister on August 18, 2009, 05:12:35 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on August 18, 2009, 05:08:22 PM
Why in the world would you want some old dude "gunslinging" (ESPN speak for "throwing picks") the ball all over the field when you've got a guy like Adrian Peterson and a monster defense (or at least the Dline is really good)?  Rosenfels and Jackson can both hand the ball off and throw the occasional pass to keep the D honest.  You don't need Brett Favre for that.

I don't want him throwing the ball all over the place.  Their strength is in the run game, so they should stick with that.

But having Jackson "manage the game" (ESPN speak for "not being able to pass") didn't get them very far last year.  They need a bit more of a passing threat, without turning it into a run-and-gun offense.  I think Favre can do that.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on August 18, 2009, 05:35:53 PM
Quote from: Barrister on August 18, 2009, 05:12:35 PM
I don't want him throwing the ball all over the place.  Their strength is in the run game, so they should stick with that.

It's Brett Favre though.  That's what he does.  "I THINK IT'S TIME FOR AN AUDIBLE AND AN INTERCEPTION!  WOO!  I'M HAVING FUN AT LEAST" *cut to Wranglers commercial*

QuoteBut having Jackson "manage the game" (ESPN speak for "not being able to pass") didn't get them very far last year.  They need a bit more of a passing threat, without turning it into a run-and-gun offense.  I think Favre can do that.

Hell...it got them to the playoffs, didn't it?  More than the New York Favres can say for last year. vOv  But hey...If Vikes fans are happy about it and looking forward to things, well...good deal.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Admiral Yi on August 18, 2009, 05:37:33 PM
What's the deal on the wildcat offense?  I haven't seen a Dolphins game since Larry Czonka was in uniform.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 18, 2009, 06:33:33 PM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on August 18, 2009, 05:37:33 PM
What's the deal on the wildcat offense?  I haven't seen a Dolphins game since Larry Czonka was in uniform.
It was a gimmick set used last year to victimize bad defenses.  Good defenses destroyed it.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 18, 2009, 06:34:13 PM
Fucking Favre.   <_<

Well, the Vikings playoff hopes are finished.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Alcibiades on August 18, 2009, 07:12:13 PM
I hate him so much right now.  *contemplates burning Favre jersey*
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: derspiess on August 18, 2009, 10:03:44 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on August 18, 2009, 05:35:53 PM
It's Brett Favre though.  That's what he does.  "I THINK IT'S TIME FOR AN AUDIBLE AND AN INTERCEPTION!  WOO!  I'M HAVING FUN AT LEAST" *cut to Wranglers commercial*

:lol:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on August 18, 2009, 10:16:56 PM
I for one am glad to see Brett Favre back in the league.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Alcibiades on August 18, 2009, 10:18:01 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on August 18, 2009, 10:16:56 PM
I for one am glad to see Brett Favre back in the league.
:rolleyes:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 19, 2009, 07:56:52 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on August 18, 2009, 10:16:56 PM
I for one am glad to see Brett Favre back in the league.
Why do you hate the Vikings and people who watch sports shows?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on August 19, 2009, 05:53:14 PM
Quote from: Neil on August 19, 2009, 07:56:52 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on August 18, 2009, 10:16:56 PM
I for one am glad to see Brett Favre back in the league.
Why do you hate the Vikings and people who watch sports shows?

It's not that big of a deal, as the not even Brett Favre can overcome Viking-Taint;  it's their curse for building a dome.
And it's also a big fuck-you to the Packers, who should've let him stay play until his arm fell off, but noooo....

Besides, Packer fans are annoying, and anything that gives them gas is a plus.  Not annoying in the Redneck-Redskins way or Obnoxious-Dickhead-Steelers way, but in the Minivan-Driving-Older-White-Woman-In-The-Office-Who-Thinks-Her-Computer-Hates-Her-And-Who's-A-New-Grandmother-Here-Look-At-All-The-Pictures way.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Barrister on August 19, 2009, 06:06:32 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on August 19, 2009, 05:53:14 PM
Quote from: Neil on August 19, 2009, 07:56:52 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on August 18, 2009, 10:16:56 PM
I for one am glad to see Brett Favre back in the league.
Why do you hate the Vikings and people who watch sports shows?

It's not that big of a deal, as the not even Brett Favre can overcome Viking-Taint;  it's their curse for building a dome.

Viking-Taint. :rolleyes:   You think they played in Detroit or something.

Besides the Colts seemed to have done okay for themselves in a Dome...
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on August 19, 2009, 06:12:36 PM
Quote from: Barrister on August 19, 2009, 06:06:32 PM
Viking-Taint. :rolleyes:   You think they played in Detroit or something.

Besides the Colts seemed to have done okay for themselves in a Dome...

The Colts never played in the Norris Division who, of all the NFL's divisions, had the most sacred trust to play football the way it was meant to be played.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Alcibiades on August 19, 2009, 06:12:47 PM
Their quarterback is actually a horse.  Literally.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: alfred russel on August 19, 2009, 06:59:26 PM
The 49ers are at hotel in which I'm staying. They seem like all right guys, and they aren't making any noise to keep me up at night. There seem to be some loser fans showing up though.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on August 19, 2009, 07:00:56 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on August 19, 2009, 06:59:26 PM
The 49ers are at hotel in which I'm staying. They seem like all right guys, and they aren't making any noise to keep me up at night. There seem to be some loser fans showing up though.

Training camp curfew.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 19, 2009, 07:09:53 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on August 19, 2009, 05:53:14 PM
Quote from: Neil on August 19, 2009, 07:56:52 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on August 18, 2009, 10:16:56 PM
I for one am glad to see Brett Favre back in the league.
Why do you hate the Vikings and people who watch sports shows?

It's not that big of a deal, as the not even Brett Favre can overcome Viking-Taint;  it's their curse for building a dome.
And it's also a big fuck-you to the Packers, who should've let him stay play until his arm fell off, but noooo....

Besides, Packer fans are annoying, and anything that gives them gas is a plus.  Not annoying in the Redneck-Redskins way or Obnoxious-Dickhead-Steelers way, but in the Minivan-Driving-Older-White-Woman-In-The-Office-Who-Thinks-Her-Computer-Hates-Her-And-Who's-A-New-Grandmother-Here-Look-At-All-The-Pictures way.
Packer fans are rare enough here that I don't have a problem with them.  At any rate, so far the decision to let Favre go has held up alright.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: derspiess on August 19, 2009, 10:04:04 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on August 19, 2009, 06:59:26 PM
There seem to be some loser fans showing up though.

My favorites are the groupies, who are targeting one or two players & wait there in the lobby for hours, only to be promptly snubbed if their players even show up at all.  And most of them are fooling themselves to think they have a shot at an NFL player.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: alfred russel on August 19, 2009, 10:41:42 PM
Quote from: derspiess on August 19, 2009, 10:04:04 PM
Quote from: alfred russel on August 19, 2009, 06:59:26 PM
There seem to be some loser fans showing up though.

My favorites are the groupies, who are targeting one or two players & wait there in the lobby for hours, only to be promptly snubbed if their players even show up at all.  And most of them are fooling themselves to think they have a shot at an NFL player.

No women showed up, but a couple of losers showed up in team jerseys. And I do mean losers--a couple of flabby overweight guys of about 30 who showed up in a car that was probably 15 years old. One had a mohawk.

I think the team is gone, and it was supposed to be a secret they were here.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: sbr on August 20, 2009, 08:05:57 PM
Plaxico Burress agreed to a plea deal that will give him a 2 year prison sentence.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news;_ylt=Atj06W3.wX.Hh8Mh40Qy5b9DubYF?slug=ap-burress-weaponscharges&prov=ap&type=lgns

QuoteNEW YORK (AP)—Facing the prospect of spending at least 3 1/2 years behind bars, one-time Super Bowl star Plaxico Burress(notes) on Thursday accepted a plea bargain with a two-year prison sentence for accidentally shooting himself in the thigh at a Manhattan nightclub.

The former New York Giants wide receiver pleaded guilty to one count of attempted criminal possession of a weapon, a lesser charge than he had faced. He will be sentenced Sept. 22, and lawyer Benjamin Brafman said he expects Burress to begin serving his sentence immediately after.

Burress got into a black SUV without speaking to reporters outside Manhattan state Supreme Court, but Brafman said, "After an agonizing period of discussion, Plaxico decided that he wanted to do this, to put this behind him as quickly as possible."

The ex-football star was indicted earlier this month on two counts of criminal possession of a weapon and one count of reckless endangerment. He faced a minimum sentence of 3 1/2 years if convicted at trial.

Hours after his court appearance, the NFL announced commissioner Roger Goodell had suspended Burress and said he is ineligible to sign with any team until he completes his jail term. Goodell, who met with Burress and his representatives last week, said Burress will be reinstated upon completion of his sentence.

Burress' guilty plea ends months of haggling between Brafman and the Manhattan district attorney's office. The case went to a grand jury after negotiations broke down, apparently because District Attorney Robert Morgenthau was insisting that Burress serve at least two years in prison.

Morgenthau did not comment on Burress' guilty plea.

Assistant District attorney John Wolfstaetter said in court that Thursday was Burress' last chance to accept the deal.

Burress, looking subdued and wearing a dark blue suit, first entered a plea of not guilty to the initial charges against him. After Brafman informed Judge Michael Melkonian that Burress had decided to plead to the lesser charge, Burress said, "Guilty" to attempted weapons possession in the second degree.

Brafman said the 32-year-old Burress was thinking of his family in taking the plea, but the attorney questioned the recommended prison sentence.

"This was not an intentional criminal act," Brafman said. "In my judgment, a two-year prison sentence is a very severe punishment."

With time off for good behavior, Burress will likely serve 20 months. He will be monitored during an additional two years after his release, which could come as early as the spring of 2011.

The Giants cut ties with Burress in April, but his former teammates said they were saddened by Thursday's news.

"He is a friend of mine, a great teammate. We won a championship with him. I am saddened by the news—two years," quarterback Eli Manning(notes) said. "Again, I just wish the best for him and his family and try to support him any way we can."

Pro Bowl defensive end Justin Tuck(notes) said his heart sank when he learned of the plea.

"Today when I heard the news, my heart went out to him and his family, and obviously I'm just hoping that everything turns out all right in the end," Tuck said.

Burress, who caught the winning touchdown for the Giants over the New England Patriots in the final minute of the 2008 Super Bowl, and former teammate Antonio Pierce(notes) were at the Latin Quarter nightclub in late November when a gun tucked into Burress' waistband slipped down his leg and fired, shooting him in the right thigh. The bullet narrowly missed a nightclub security guard who was standing inches away, prosecutors said. It lodged in the floor and was recovered by a bartender.

The gun was not licensed in New York or in New Jersey, where Burress lived. His license to carry a concealed weapon in the state of Florida had expired in May 2008.

Prosecutors said Pierce drove Burress to a hospital, then took the gun to his own home in New Jersey. It was later delivered to Burress' home.

Pierce was not indicted. The grand jury also did not indict the nightclub security guard who carried the gun to Pierce's car or the hospital staff members who failed to notify police that Burress had been shot. Pierce did not speak to reporters at Giants training camp on Thursday.


Not exactly shocking if you have been following the case; it does amuse me that he gets 2 years for shooting himself and Stallworth served 24 days of a 30 day sentence for actually killing someone.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 20, 2009, 08:21:32 PM
Quote from: sbr on August 20, 2009, 08:05:57 PM
Not exactly shocking if you have been following the case; it does amuse me that he gets 2 years for shooting himself and Stallworth served 24 days of a 30 day sentence for actually killing someone.
Looks like the right to bear arms isn't as important as one might think.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: derspiess on August 20, 2009, 09:03:30 PM
Shit, Chad Johnson actually kicked a decent-looking PAT & had a solid kickoff :huh:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 20, 2009, 09:06:29 PM
Quote from: derspiess on August 20, 2009, 09:03:30 PM
Shit, Chad Johnson actually kicked a decent-looking PAT & solid kickoff :huh:
He may be washed up as a receiver, but that doesn't mean that he can't contribute!
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on August 20, 2009, 09:10:18 PM
Quote from: derspiess on August 20, 2009, 09:03:30 PM
Shit, Chad Johnson actually kicked a decent-looking PAT & had a solid kickoff :huh:
Why was he kicking?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: derspiess on August 20, 2009, 09:11:28 PM
Quote from: Neil on August 20, 2009, 09:06:29 PM
Quote from: derspiess on August 20, 2009, 09:03:30 PM
Shit, Chad Johnson actually kicked a decent-looking PAT & solid kickoff :huh:
He may be washed up as a receiver, but that doesn't mean that he can't contribute!

:thumbsup:  In all seriousness though, those were NFL-caliber kicks.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: derspiess on August 20, 2009, 09:13:03 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on August 20, 2009, 09:10:18 PM
Quote from: derspiess on August 20, 2009, 09:03:30 PM
Shit, Chad Johnson actually kicked a decent-looking PAT & had a solid kickoff :huh:
Why was he kicking?

They pulled Shayne Graham due to a slight ankle injury, and for whatever reason they split kicking duties between him & the punter.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: sbr on August 20, 2009, 09:39:45 PM
I love me some Ocho Cinqo. 
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadImmortalMan on August 21, 2009, 01:08:19 AM
Quote from: Neil on August 20, 2009, 09:06:29 PM
Quote from: derspiess on August 20, 2009, 09:03:30 PM
Shit, Chad Johnson actually kicked a decent-looking PAT & solid kickoff :huh:
He may be washed up as a human being, but that doesn't mean that he can't contribute!


FYP
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on August 21, 2009, 07:02:17 AM
Quote from: sbr on August 20, 2009, 08:05:57 PM
Not exactly shocking if you have been following the case; it does amuse me that he gets 2 years for shooting himself and Stallworth served 24 days of a 30 day sentence for actually killing someone.

Different jurisdictions.
Besides, Stallworth's accident was was qualified by the fact that the victim had committed pedestrian error.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: sbr on August 21, 2009, 01:44:54 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on August 21, 2009, 07:02:17 AM
Quote from: sbr on August 20, 2009, 08:05:57 PM
Not exactly shocking if you have been following the case; it does amuse me that he gets 2 years for shooting himself and Stallworth served 24 days of a 30 day sentence for actually killing someone.

Different jurisdictions.
Besides, Stallworth's accident was was qualified by the fact that the victim had committed pedestrian error.

I didn't intend to directly compare them, but it is hard to not make the connection.  Burress is also going to serve more time in prison than Michael Vick, Leonard Little who killed someone while driving drunk about 10 years ago, and more than Mike Tyson did for raping a woman in Indianapolis.

I do think Burress should serve at least a year, if for nothing else, than for packing heat in the pocket of a pair fo sweatpants.  If you aren't prepared to roll with a proper holster at least buy a goddamn pair of Wranglers and tuck the thing into your waistband.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadImmortalMan on August 21, 2009, 02:31:11 PM
Quote from: sbr on August 21, 2009, 01:44:54 PM
I do think Burress should serve at least a year, if for nothing else, than for packing heat in the pocket of a pair fo sweatpants.  If you aren't prepared to roll with a proper holster at least buy a goddamn pair of Wranglers and tuck the thing into your waistband.

Heh. Burress got his own punishment already. He shot himself. Plus he got the humiliation of having shot his damn self. The court should have just laughed at him and sent him home.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: PRC on August 21, 2009, 03:12:29 PM
I was listening to the radio and heard that the Raiders head coach punched out one of the assistant coaches who was really a snitch for Al Davis.  Why is that organization even still in business?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Sophie Scholl on August 21, 2009, 03:53:39 PM
Quote from: PRC on August 21, 2009, 03:12:29 PM
I was listening to the radio and heard that the Raiders head coach punched out one of the assistant coaches who was really a snitch for Al Davis.  Why is that organization even still in business?
We Raider fans trying to replace the Jews as God's favorite whipping boys. :Joos
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on August 21, 2009, 04:10:25 PM
Quote from: PRC on August 21, 2009, 03:12:29 PM
I was listening to the radio and heard that the Raiders head coach punched out one of the assistant coaches who was really a snitch for Al Davis.  Why is that organization even still in business?
There are conflicting reports on that.

Some say the head coach sucker punched the assistant and broke his jaw. Others say he flipped the assistant out of his chair into a cabinet and broke his jaw that way.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 21, 2009, 07:03:10 PM
Quote from: sbr on August 21, 2009, 01:44:54 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on August 21, 2009, 07:02:17 AM
Quote from: sbr on August 20, 2009, 08:05:57 PM
Not exactly shocking if you have been following the case; it does amuse me that he gets 2 years for shooting himself and Stallworth served 24 days of a 30 day sentence for actually killing someone.

Different jurisdictions.
Besides, Stallworth's accident was was qualified by the fact that the victim had committed pedestrian error.

I didn't intend to directly compare them, but it is hard to not make the connection.  Burress is also going to serve more time in prison than Michael Vick, Leonard Little who killed someone while driving drunk about 10 years ago, and more than Mike Tyson did for raping a woman in Indianapolis.

I do think Burress should serve at least a year, if for nothing else, than for packing heat in the pocket of a pair fo sweatpants.  If you aren't prepared to roll with a proper holster at least buy a goddamn pair of Wranglers and tuck the thing into your waistband.
Yeah, well Burress' crime is more serious than Vick's, and Mike Tyson was only convicted because it was the early 90s.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Valmy on August 21, 2009, 07:18:15 PM
Quote from: Judas Iscariot on August 21, 2009, 03:53:39 PM
We Raider fans trying to replace the Jews as God's favorite whipping boys. :Joos

The Jews sit around waiting for the Messiah and the Raider fans sit around waiting for Al Davis to die.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Sophie Scholl on August 21, 2009, 08:33:20 PM
And still we wait!  Oy vey!  Through our Diaspora to Los Angeles and back again to the Promised Land of Oakland, we waited.  We still wait, we will continue to wait till the moment promised to us, the moment that will reward our years of hardship and suffering, our years of being ridiculed and mocked.  Soon now, soon...
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: citizen k on August 21, 2009, 08:43:13 PM
Quote from: Judas Iscariot on August 21, 2009, 08:33:20 PM
And still we wait! .... Soon now, soon...

I was with you until, "Soon now, soon".

Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Sophie Scholl on August 21, 2009, 08:59:32 PM
Quote from: citizen k on August 21, 2009, 08:43:13 PM
Quote from: Judas Iscariot on August 21, 2009, 08:33:20 PM
And still we wait! .... Soon now, soon...

I was with you until, "Soon now, soon".
:lol: It's the only way to keep the faith.  Just one more day, just one more day...
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on August 21, 2009, 09:26:55 PM
Quote from: Judas Iscariot on August 21, 2009, 08:33:20 PM
And still we wait!  Oy vey!  Through our Diaspora to Los Angeles and back again to the Promised Land of Oakland, we waited.  We still wait, we will continue to wait till the moment promised to us, the moment that will reward our years of hardship and suffering, our years of being ridiculed and mocked.  Soon now, soon...

Fuck you.  You had the 1970s, scarring my childhood forever.  You and Al Davis can go piss up a rope.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 21, 2009, 09:40:54 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on August 21, 2009, 09:26:55 PM
Quote from: Judas Iscariot on August 21, 2009, 08:33:20 PM
And still we wait!  Oy vey!  Through our Diaspora to Los Angeles and back again to the Promised Land of Oakland, we waited.  We still wait, we will continue to wait till the moment promised to us, the moment that will reward our years of hardship and suffering, our years of being ridiculed and mocked.  Soon now, soon...

Fuck you.  You had the 1970s, scarring my childhood forever.  You and Al Davis can go piss up a rope.
Were the 70s Raiders so bad?  Better them than the Steelers.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: PRC on August 21, 2009, 09:48:39 PM
"Dollar" Bill Wirtz died... so will Al Davis.  The question is who gets the team when he goes?  It's worked out well for the Blackhawks.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on August 21, 2009, 09:52:20 PM
Quote from: PRC on August 21, 2009, 09:48:39 PM
"Dollar" Bill Wirtz died... so will Al Davis.  The question is who gets the team when he goes?  It's worked out well for the Blackhawks.
Jeff George
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on August 21, 2009, 10:21:14 PM
Quote from: Neil on August 21, 2009, 09:40:54 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on August 21, 2009, 09:26:55 PM
Quote from: Judas Iscariot on August 21, 2009, 08:33:20 PM
And still we wait!  Oy vey!  Through our Diaspora to Los Angeles and back again to the Promised Land of Oakland, we waited.  We still wait, we will continue to wait till the moment promised to us, the moment that will reward our years of hardship and suffering, our years of being ridiculed and mocked.  Soon now, soon...

Fuck you.  You had the 1970s, scarring my childhood forever.  You and Al Davis can go piss up a rope.
Were the 70s Raiders so bad?  Better them than the Steelers.

Yes, they were far more evullier and skerrier.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadImmortalMan on August 22, 2009, 01:07:02 AM
Well I have to admit I've never heard anyone use the term "promised land" in reference to Oakland before.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Sophie Scholl on August 22, 2009, 03:41:17 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on August 21, 2009, 09:26:55 PM
Fuck you.  You had the 1970s, scarring my childhood forever.  You and Al Davis can go piss up a rope.
Yeah, but one problem:  I was born in 1982.  I was stuck inheriting them via the old man with none of the triumph, only the tragedy.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on August 22, 2009, 06:57:11 AM
Quote from: Judas Iscariot on August 22, 2009, 03:41:17 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on August 21, 2009, 09:26:55 PM
Fuck you.  You had the 1970s, scarring my childhood forever.  You and Al Davis can go piss up a rope.
Yeah, but one problem:  I was born in 1982.  I was stuck inheriting them via the old man with none of the triumph, only the tragedy.

LOLZ, Jay Schroeder.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: PDH on August 22, 2009, 07:49:27 AM
Judas must realize his faith is misplaced.  Sure, they WERE the Oakland Raiders, they are no more.  They left, they ran off.  What returned was not the Raiders, but some dusty old fart's dream of what was.

Maybe, maybe when Al Davis dies the team will be the Raiders again.  There is no hope until then.  As a former Upper Californian, I realize this.  It has been a long time since 1980...
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: callmeclemens on August 22, 2009, 01:29:34 PM
Raiders signed Jeff Garcia in the off season, he's pretty sweet still right?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 22, 2009, 01:54:58 PM
Quote from: callmeclemens on August 22, 2009, 01:29:34 PM
Raiders signed Jeff Garcia in the off season, he's pretty sweet still right?
Yes.  The only problem is that the Raiders will start that bust from LSU, no matter what.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on August 22, 2009, 03:06:32 PM
Roethlisberger strikes back!

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/08/22/roethlisberger-continues-relentless-assault-on-his-accuser/
QuoteRoethlisberger continues relentless assault on his accuser
Posted by Mike Florio on August 22, 2009 12:04 AM ET
Three days after releasing e-mail messages described as the "tip of the investigative iceberg" and publicly demanding that the woman suing Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger abandon her case immediately, Roethlisberger has filed a motion to dismiss the claims against him, support by a 43-page legal brief and 29 exhibits.

We've obtained a copy of everything that has been filed.  (And, consequently, the hard drive on the official PFT Commodore 64 is now full.)

Put simply, the attack against the plaintiff is among the most aggressive I've seen in nearly 18 years of practicing law.

"Plaintiff is a disturbed and calculating woman," Roethlisberger's memorandum states at the outset of the "Introduction" section, "who, together with counsel, fabricated a claim of sexual assault against a two-time Super Bowl winning quarterback to save her job and extort a large monetary payoff."

Roethlisberger also alleged that the plaintiff and her counsel hinted that criminal charges would be filed absent a settlement.  Roethlisberger, in turn, accuses the plaintiff and her lawyer of committing a felony under Nevada law:  "A person who, with the intent to . . . gain any money . . . threatens directly or indirectly to accuse any person of a crime . . . is guilty of a category B felony . . . ."

Roethlisberger also claims that the plaintiff obtained her U.S. Naturalization through false statements, falsely received disability benefits to cover a leave of absence from work, and has "defiled the sanctity of this Court with unsubstantiated and salacious allegations of sexual assault."

The memorandum attaches various affidavits that, in Roethlisberger's view, support the contention that the plaintiff is "an admitted sex addict," that she was "excited about the prospect of having sex with" Roethlisberger, and that she told one of her co-workers that she was interested in having sex with him.

Though the memo contains no express admission by Roethlisberger that a sexual encounter occurred between Roethlisberger and the plaintiff, he never denies it -- and the text of the memorandum strongly implies it:  "Plaintiff boasted that her sex encounter with Mr. Roethlisberger as the 'best ever' and that she did not care if it ever happened again because the sex was 'soooo good.'"

Roethlisberger requests that the plaintiff be required to submit to an "immediate medical examination," alleging that "there is no question that Plaintiff is unstable mentally."

So, regardless of the merits of the case (and, frankly, it doesn't look good at this point for the plaintiff), Roethlisberger's lawyers are using the "nuts and sluts" defense by calling the plaintiff both a nut and a slut.

That said, it's their prerogative to attempt to approve either or both things, if they so choose.  There's a chance it will backfire, however.

But there's also a chance that the approach will cause her to give up, especially if the contention that her charges have been fabricated is true.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: PDH on August 22, 2009, 03:25:26 PM
"Nuts and sluts" defense?  That sounds horribly wrong...
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 22, 2009, 03:26:07 PM
Good.  Crush the bitch.

It's nice that we've come far enough as a society that a woman crying rape can be thoroughly debunked.  Fifteen years ago, she'd already be cashing her cheque.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on August 22, 2009, 04:07:38 PM
I'm going to laugh when that backfires on Rapistburger.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 22, 2009, 04:57:44 PM
Tavaris Jackson looks like the better QB so far.  LOL.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Sophie Scholl on August 22, 2009, 06:20:03 PM
Quote from: Neil on August 22, 2009, 01:54:58 PM
Quote from: callmeclemens on August 22, 2009, 01:29:34 PM
Raiders signed Jeff Garcia in the off season, he's pretty sweet still right?
Yes.  The only problem is that the Raiders will start that bust from LSU, no matter what.
To do otherwise makes for a slide in AL Davis's overhead presentations.  You must believe in Jamarcus!  Or your ass is fired.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Vince on August 22, 2009, 06:29:56 PM
Quote from: Judas Iscariot on August 22, 2009, 06:20:03 PM
To do otherwise makes for a slide in AL Davis's overhead presentations.  You must believe in Jamarcus!  Or your ass is fired.

I'm sure Cable will knock his ass out if Al gets too uppity.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 22, 2009, 06:42:04 PM
Quote from: Judas Iscariot on August 22, 2009, 06:20:03 PM
Quote from: Neil on August 22, 2009, 01:54:58 PM
Quote from: callmeclemens on August 22, 2009, 01:29:34 PM
Raiders signed Jeff Garcia in the off season, he's pretty sweet still right?
Yes.  The only problem is that the Raiders will start that bust from LSU, no matter what.
To do otherwise makes for a slide in AL Davis's overhead presentations.  You must believe in Jamarcus!  Or your ass is fired.
I wonder which owner is crazier:  The current Al Davis, or the Vince McMahon character.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on August 22, 2009, 06:50:12 PM
The Brownies look alright, but they are playing against the Lions.

And Bernie Kosar ain't bad in the booth.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Vince on August 22, 2009, 11:06:03 PM
Quote from: Neil on August 22, 2009, 06:42:04 PM
I wonder which owner is crazier:  The current Al Davis, or the Vince McMahon character.

I'd pay good money to see Al Davis take out Bob Kraft with a steel chair to the head.  :menace:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on August 23, 2009, 12:23:07 AM
Quote from: Ed Anger on August 22, 2009, 06:50:12 PM
And Bernie Kosar ain't bad in the booth.

Of course he isn't.  :mad:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on August 23, 2009, 09:31:13 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on August 23, 2009, 12:23:07 AM
Quote from: Ed Anger on August 22, 2009, 06:50:12 PM
And Bernie Kosar ain't bad in the booth.

Of course he isn't.  :mad:

I'm used to Anthony Munoz's preseason commentary, which consists of cliches, old stories from the Bengals glory days and mumbling into the mic.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: sbr on August 23, 2009, 10:34:29 AM
Quote from: Ed Anger on August 23, 2009, 09:31:13 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on August 23, 2009, 12:23:07 AM
Quote from: Ed Anger on August 22, 2009, 06:50:12 PM
And Bernie Kosar ain't bad in the booth.

Of course he isn't.  :mad:

I'm used to Anthony Munoz's preseason commentary, which consists of cliches, old stories from the Bengals glory days and mumbling into the mic.

Does he only work the first quarter?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on August 23, 2009, 10:43:16 AM
Quote from: sbr on August 23, 2009, 10:34:29 AM
Does he only work the first quarter?

Careful, Ed will smother you in your sleep with his David Klingler Fathead wall decal.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: sbr on August 23, 2009, 10:46:17 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on August 23, 2009, 10:43:16 AM
Quote from: sbr on August 23, 2009, 10:34:29 AM
Does he only work the first quarter?

Careful, Ed will smother you in your sleep with his David Klingler Fathead wall decal.

Kinky.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Grey Fox on August 23, 2009, 10:46:39 AM
LFFL draft is tonite!
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Liep on August 23, 2009, 10:52:35 AM
Quote from: Grey Fox on August 23, 2009, 10:46:39 AM
LFFL draft is tonite!

Crickey! It's an awful time of the night to place such an event, it gives me 3 hours of sleep afterwards before I gotta get to work.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on August 23, 2009, 11:00:56 AM
Ah, the joys of Raider camp.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news;_ylt=AjYyvc9AFM5Z1P_Bd6M_3nxDubYF?slug=ms-raiderscamp082009&prov=yhoo&type=lgns
QuoteFisticuffs, insubordination not new for Raiders


By Michael Silver, Yahoo! Sports  Aug 20, 1:14 pm EDT

NAPA, Calif. – The 80-year-old legend sat silently in a motorized cart, watching his most-dreaded football nightmare play out in all its twisted splendor. There were Al Davis' Oakland Raiders on Wednesday morning, hosting the third of four joint training camp practices with the San Francisco 49ers, getting physically and verbally abused by their cross-Bay rivals and meekly submitting to the butt-whipping.

"I love it when they can't compete!" 49ers cornerback Nate Clements(notes) screamed after intercepting Raiders quarterback JaMarcus Russell(notes) in a lopsided red-zone drill, setting off a barrage of condescending cackles from the visitors in red and gold.

As his obviously intimidated offense continued to struggle, and the 49ers celebrated each interception with cocksure elation, Davis couldn't have been thrilled by his team's passivity. Yet in one sense, the Raiders' lack of fight could have been construed as a promising sign. After learning earlier this week that the NFL will investigate an Aug. 5 incident in which defensive assistant Randy Hanson was hospitalized with a fractured jaw – reportedly sustained during an altercation with head coach Tom Cable, who has denied his involvement – Davis has once again been confronted with a culture steeped in incidents involving internal turmoil.

(On Wednesday night a source close to Hanson told Yahoo! Sports that the coach is back in a hospital because of swelling in his jaw. The source insisted Cable "is definitely" responsible for the injury and that "I was told Tom had to be pulled off of him two times.")

Violent confrontations between employees is nothing new for a franchise that has compiled the NFL's worst overall record (24-72) during the past six seasons. Interviews with numerous current and former players, coaches and front-office employees reveal a consistent pattern of physically charged clashes, most of which went unreported. In addition, the principals rarely incurred overt discipline, creating the impression that lawlessness is a way of life in Raiderland.

"It's never a dull moment," says USC receivers coach John Morton, who worked for the Raiders in various capacities from 1997-2004. "It's hard to be a Raider – it's not for everybody. If you're a player or coach, you've got to have thick skin. And every time you hear something about the Raiders, it's something that's kind of crazy."

Added another former Raiders assistant who recently worked for the team: "The environment sucks there. Everybody just wants their side to do well so Al doesn't call them out. Trust me, after what just happened with Cable, this staff already knows they're fired."

Given that Davis, among NFL owners, has unrivaled involvement in the day-to-day operation of his franchise, there's no question that he bears a great deal of responsibility for the contentious environment.

"I just think that's Al's way," says Packers cornerback Charles Woodson(notes), who spent his first eight NFL seasons (1998-2005) in Oakland. "There are forces pulling you every which way, and it just seems like people are never on the same page."

Or, as one Raiders veteran said earlier this week in response to the Cable incident, "Just another day at the office around here. You know how that goes. It's always something."

Among the incidents recalled by that player and some of his former teammates and coaches was a practice-field confrontation at the team's Alameda, Calif., training headquarters late in 2004 between Morton, then the team's tight ends coach, and tight end Teyo Johnson(notes). It occurred three days before the final regular-season game after Johnson, an underachieving '03 second-round NFL draft pick, ran the wrong route in practice.

Several witnesses say that, after Morton loudly upbraided Johnson for his mistake, the player angrily got in the coach's face and shoved him in the chest. The two men screamed at one another in close proximity before they were separated by players and coaches.

"No, he didn't push me," Morton insists. "He got up in my face and chest-bumped me or something. He just snapped and started going off – you know, a player being macho. You've got to know your limitations."

The confrontation brought an end to practice, and as Johnson walked off the field, one former player remembers Davis' odd reaction: "He was standing in the north end zone and as Teyo walked by Al said, 'Teyo – you can't win 'em all.' "

According to the same player Johnson was not disciplined by Davis or then-coach Norv Turner. Johnson remained on the roster until the following summer, when he was released at the end of the preseason. Morton was not retained after the '04 season.

"They fired the coach and kept the player," the former player said. "That's what they do in Oakland."

In October of 2005 another incident occurred, this time with the coach as the aggressor. According to several people who witnessed the incident, Martin Bayless, then Oakland's defensive backs coach, got physical with then-rookie cornerback Stanford Routt(notes) in the Oakland Coliseum locker room following the Raiders' 38-17 victory over the Buffalo Bills.

Witnesses say Bayless was enraged that Routt, who is still with the team, had refused to enter the game as part of the field-goal rush unit, forcing a veteran to race onto the field in his place. Bayless, who did not return messages seeking comment, chewed out Routt at the player's locker shortly after the game, and things quickly escalated.

"[Bayless] jacked him up into his locker and shoved him down," recalls one witness who played for the '05 Raiders.

These as-yet-unreported incidents came in the wake of a high-profile 2003 assault by linebacker Bill Romanowski on teammate Marcus Williams. Punched by Romanowski following a practice-field dispute, Williams sustained a serious eye injury that effectively ended his career. He later filed a civil suit against his Romanowski and was ultimately awarded $340,000 in damages.

"That [punch] got the publicity, but I saw so many things like that," says one former Raiders player who is now with another team. "I saw a player push a coach and get his game check taken away. Other players would cuss out coaches and get away with it. One coach made a smartass comment and a player pushed him almost to the ground. I saw a coach take a swing at a player. Coaches were verbally going after other coaches. And guys were getting drunk in meetings or coming to practice still drunk from the night before. They'd throw up before we went out on the field, or you could smell the liquor on their breath."

Some of the franchise's dysfunction was revealed last Sept. 30 when Davis, in a televised news conference that lasted more than 90 minutes, announced that he had fired second-year coach Lane Kiffin and was promoting Cable, then the offensive line coach, as the interim replacement. Davis said he was firing Kiffin "for cause" – meaning he intended to withhold the balance of the coach's contract – and part of his case included Kiffin's treatment of Hanson, the team's second-year assistant defensive backs coach.

After Hanson reportedly made a derogatory remark in a coach's meeting following the team's 41-14 defeat to the Denver Broncos in the '08 season opener, Kiffin suspended him for five days without Davis' knowledge.

Following the season, Davis retained Cable as head coach but purged defensive coordinator Rob Ryan and the rest of the team's defensive assistants – except for Hanson, who remained on the staff with a new title.

According to several sources, Hanson was seen as a Davis favorite and confidante, and thus was resented by numerous players and coaches, particularly Cable.

"Randy Hanson thought he was the smartest guy in the world," one former Raiders player says. "In our first game [in '07], we went up against [offensive coordinator] Mike Martz and the Lions, and he went around bragging that he had 'cracked the code.' That game [a 36-21 Detroit victory] was a joke – we were out there guessing and getting our asses kicked. In the fourth quarter Martz didn't call a single play that Randy Hanson had ever seen. Yeah, he sure 'cracked that code.' "

Hanson, several former and current players say, was suspected by his peers of feeding information to Davis.

"The guy's considered a snitch," says one player who was with the team in 2007. "Al would come to practice every Thursday and see what we had installed, so if Rob [Ryan] or Lane wanted to put something in the game plan without him knowing, they'd have to put it in for the Friday practice or the [Saturday] walk-through. But [Davis] would find out and get mad, and they thought Hanson was the guy telling him. We didn't trust him, either."

It's unclear whether Cable's potential mistrust of Hanson precipitated the Aug. 5 incident that landed the assistant in the hospital, but several sources familiar with the two men believe this was the case. On Monday, AOL FanHouse reported that Cable had hit Hanson and that the assistant "never saw it coming." A police report taken at Queen of the Valley Hospital in Napa on Aug. 6 identified neither Hanson nor the attacker.

Hanson was not at practice on Monday when the FanHouse report surfaced and has not been spotted in at the Raiders' facilities since (as of Wednesday evening). At the start of their Monday afternoon practice a group of Raiders made light of the incident, chanting "Cable, Bumaye" – a reference to the "Ali, Bumaye" chant in Zaire during the 1974 "Rumble In The Jungle" heavyweight fight between Muhammad Ali and George Foreman. (The chant translates to "Cable Kill Him!)

On Monday Cable declined to discuss the reported incident, calling it an internal matter. He reversed course in a conversation that evening with ESPN analyst Mark Schlereth, his former teammate at the University of Idaho, claiming "nothing happened" – words he repeated to a large gathering of reporters after the first joint practice with the 49ers on Tuesday morning.

Hanson, according to one friend, is deliberately sitting back on the advice of his lawyers while Cable and other Raiders officials make potentially damning statements. It is believed by some in the organization that Davis will compensate Hanson for his trouble and attempt to remedy the situation by shifting him to the personnel department.

Photo Cable with Russell during last week's preseason opener.
(Jed Jacobsohn/Getty)

On Wednesday, as Romanowski looked on as a credentialed camp visitor, the Raiders' offensive unit appeared shell-shocked in its competition with the fired-up 49ers, who grew louder with each interception or pass-breakup. Afterward, Cable blamed himself for the struggles, telling reporters he'd instructed Russell to "cut it loose" near the end zone, which led to unnecessary risks.

However, Cable questioned his players' passive reaction to the beat-down, adding, "Those kinds of things happen to you in a game, so you've got to be able to handle those adversity moments and just get back on the horse and go again. I didn't think we did a very good job of that, but I may have put them in a negative situation, too."

If Cable is found by the league to be culpable in the Hanson incident, he may have put his players in a negative situation that could set a tenuous tone for the '09 season and put his job in jeopardy.

Then again, as his owner could certainly attest, you can't win 'em all.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: sbr on August 23, 2009, 11:14:07 AM
Why is the league investigating an incident between two coaches?  I guess I understand the cops getting involved if it could be an assault case but the league should leave it alone, IMO.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on August 23, 2009, 11:20:37 AM
Quote from: sbr on August 23, 2009, 11:14:07 AM
Why is the league investigating an incident between two coaches?  I guess I understand the cops getting involved if it could be an assault case but the league should leave it alone, IMO.
Wouldn't the league investigate a fight between two players that landed one in the hospital if it was believed that the team wouldn't do anything about it?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 23, 2009, 11:35:43 AM
Quote from: sbr on August 23, 2009, 11:14:07 AM
Why is the league investigating an incident between two coaches?  I guess I understand the cops getting involved if it could be an assault case but the league should leave it alone, IMO.
The new Commish is aggressive with behavior issues.  I'm sure he'd get involved if Al Davis punched Jerry Jones.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: sbr on August 23, 2009, 11:58:57 AM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on August 23, 2009, 11:20:37 AM
Quote from: sbr on August 23, 2009, 11:14:07 AM
Why is the league investigating an incident between two coaches?  I guess I understand the cops getting involved if it could be an assault case but the league should leave it alone, IMO.
Wouldn't the league investigate a fight between two players that landed one in the hospital if it was believed that the team wouldn't do anything about it?

Probably, but just because you can, doesn't mean you should.  Also for some reason it feels different to me when it is 2 coaches instead of 2 players, can't quite pinpoint why though.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: sbr on August 23, 2009, 11:59:50 AM
Quote from: Neil on August 23, 2009, 11:35:43 AM
Quote from: sbr on August 23, 2009, 11:14:07 AM
Why is the league investigating an incident between two coaches?  I guess I understand the cops getting involved if it could be an assault case but the league should leave it alone, IMO.
The new Commish is aggressive with behavior issues.  I'm sure he'd get involved if Al Davis punched Jerry Jones.

I bet he would; do you think he would get involved when Jerreh beat Al to death with his own motorized scooter though?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Strix on August 23, 2009, 12:30:43 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on August 23, 2009, 11:20:37 AM
Wouldn't the league investigate a fight between two players that landed one in the hospital if it was believed that the team wouldn't do anything about it?

I doubt it providing nothing illegal occurred and/or no charges were pressed.

I don't remember the league issuing any statements when Steve Smith attacked Ken Lucas and broke his orbital socket (or when he broke Bright's nose several years earlier) in training camp.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: sbr on August 23, 2009, 12:45:34 PM
Quote from: Strix on August 23, 2009, 12:30:43 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on August 23, 2009, 11:20:37 AM
Wouldn't the league investigate a fight between two players that landed one in the hospital if it was believed that the team wouldn't do anything about it?

I doubt it providing nothing illegal occurred and/or no charges were pressed.

I don't remember the league issuing any statements when Steve Smith attacked Ken Lucas and broke his orbital socket (or when he broke Bright's nose several years earlier) in training camp.

Nor when Romanowski broke a teammate's face, as mentioned in the article.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on August 23, 2009, 02:15:00 PM
I see the Ravens picked up Nader Abdallah. Good to see Ohio State folks end up somewhere. If he lasts there.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 23, 2009, 03:21:20 PM
Quote from: Ed Anger on August 23, 2009, 02:15:00 PM
I see the Ravens picked up Nader Abdallah. Good to see Ohio State folks end up somewhere. If he lasts there.
That's a tough team to make it on as a D lineman, what with Ngata, Gregg, Pryce, McKinney, Bannan and Edwards.  If he lasts, it'll be because he can play on the end.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 23, 2009, 03:53:46 PM
Only seven minutes to the start of the LFFL draft.  One that will result in my victory.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Alcibiades on August 23, 2009, 03:58:31 PM
Can't seem to connect to the live draft.  Trickery by you Neil?

What kind of name is Neil by the way?  Really don't like it.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Strix on August 23, 2009, 03:59:13 PM
Quote from: Neil on August 23, 2009, 03:53:46 PM
Only seven minutes to the start of the LFFL draft.  One that will result in my victory.

It's a hollow victory without my participation. It makes you the Tommy Maddox of Languish. Sure you can win the Championship and be the MVP but it's only the XFL.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on August 23, 2009, 04:16:07 PM
Quote from: Strix on August 23, 2009, 12:30:43 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on August 23, 2009, 11:20:37 AM
Wouldn't the league investigate a fight between two players that landed one in the hospital if it was believed that the team wouldn't do anything about it?

I doubt it providing nothing illegal occurred and/or no charges were pressed.

I don't remember the league issuing any statements when Steve Smith attacked Ken Lucas and broke his orbital socket (or when he broke Bright's nose several years earlier) in training camp.
The team suspended Smith didn't it?

Taglibue was in charge for the 2nd.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: callmeclemens on August 23, 2009, 04:18:39 PM
Quote from: Strix on August 23, 2009, 12:30:43 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on August 23, 2009, 11:20:37 AM
Wouldn't the league investigate a fight between two players that landed one in the hospital if it was believed that the team wouldn't do anything about it?

I doubt it providing nothing illegal occurred and/or no charges were pressed.

I don't remember the league issuing any statements when Steve Smith attacked Ken Lucas and broke his orbital socket (or when he broke Bright's nose several years earlier) in training camp.

I'm surely it would vary from team to team as a PR thing, and lets face it do we think raiders fans really care?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on August 23, 2009, 04:20:10 PM
Quote from: Alcibiades on August 23, 2009, 03:58:31 PM
Can't seem to connect to the live draft.  Trickery by you Neil?

What kind of name is Neil by the way?  Really don't like it.
I couldn't get into it either. It would just load and load and load. <_<
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: sbr on August 23, 2009, 04:21:26 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on August 23, 2009, 04:20:10 PM
Quote from: Alcibiades on August 23, 2009, 03:58:31 PM
Can't seem to connect to the live draft.  Trickery by you Neil?

What kind of name is Neil by the way?  Really don't like it.
I couldn't get into it either. It would just load and load and load. <_<

Somone in the draft I was just in had problems connecting to the Yahoo draft with FF; I used Chrome perfectly.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Alcibiades on August 23, 2009, 04:26:16 PM
Couldn't connect with firefox or IE at first.  FF finally connected at the beginning of the second round for me.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on August 23, 2009, 04:30:02 PM
Finally got in.

The computer picked Michael Turner, Darren MacFadden, Marqus Colston and Dwayne Bowe.  That's pretty good.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: katmai on August 23, 2009, 05:35:56 PM
Happy with my team, but will be screwed if/when Rivers goes down.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Alcibiades on August 23, 2009, 05:39:57 PM
Wish I even had a Rivers caliber play on my team.  :weep:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on August 23, 2009, 05:41:38 PM
The mighty BURGER MAKERS! :

QB Matt Ryan (ATL)
QB Jeff Garcia (OAK)

RB Maurice Jones-Drew (JAX)
RB Willis McGahee (BAL)
RB Tim Hightower (ARI)
RB Chris Brown (HOU)
RB Ladell Betts (PIT)

WR Brandon Marshall (DEN)
WR Roddy White (ATL)
WR Brian Robiskie (CLE)
WR Steve Smith (NYG)

TE Kevin Boss (NYG)
TE Martellus Bennett (DAL)

K Kris Brown (HOU)
K Ryan Succop (KC)

D Tennessee
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 23, 2009, 05:42:02 PM
My team is alright.  I'm a little thin at wideout, but we'll see.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 23, 2009, 05:46:37 PM
The Fighting Nixons are:

QB Kurt Warner (Cardinals)
QB Jamarcus Russell (Raiders)
QB Kyle Boller (Rams)

RB Adrian Peterson (Vikings)
RB Marshawn Lynch (Bills)
RB Carnell Williams (Buccaneers)
RB Tashard Choice (Cowboys)

WR Anthony Gonzalez (Colts)
WR Derrick Mason (Ravens)
WR Bernard Berrian (Vikings)
WR Justin Gage (Titans)
WR Chris 'Thug Life' Henry (Bengals)

TE Todd Heap (Ravens)

K Phil Dawson (Browns)

D Miami Dolphins
D Cleveland Browns
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Alcibiades on August 23, 2009, 05:46:53 PM
Burger fucked me on two picks.

edit-  pick any three players on your team and they're better than all of mine, Neil.  :lol:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on August 23, 2009, 05:51:57 PM
The Puerto Rican Ninjas

QB         
Chad Pennington (Mia)
Trent Edwards (Buf)        

WR         
Dwayne Bowe (KC)
Marques Colston (NO)
Donald Driver (GB)
Davone Bess (Mia)   
Dennis Northcutt (Det)
Antwaan Randle El (Was)

RB         
Michael Turner (Atl)
Darren McFadden (Oak)
Fui Vakapuna (Cin)

TE         
Jeremy Shockey (NO)
Benjamin Watson (NE)

K   
Josh Brown (StL)

DEF         
New England
Seattle

      
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 23, 2009, 05:52:51 PM
Quote from: Alcibiades on August 23, 2009, 05:46:53 PM
Burger fucked me on two picks.

edit-  pick any three players on your team and they're better than all of mine, Neil.  :lol:
Kyle Boller, Phil Dawson, Tashard Choice.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on August 23, 2009, 05:55:51 PM
Quote from: Alcibiades on August 23, 2009, 05:46:53 PM
Burger fucked me on two picks.

Kinda funny.  On that Matt Ryan one, I had just signed on, saw I didn't have a QB yet, then noticed that it was my turn to pick and was counting down.  :lol:  "Hey Matt Ryan!" *click*

Who was the other dude?  Roddy White?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Barrister on August 23, 2009, 06:37:03 PM
The Frozen Yukoners:

Peyton Manning
TJ Houshmandzadeh
Hines Ward
Kevin Curtis
Ryan Grant
Willie Parker
Visanthe Shiancoe
Sammy Morris
Joe Flacco
Michael Clayton
Donald Lee
Jabar Gaffney
Matt Prater
Joe Nedey
Philadelphia Defense
Buffalo Defense

I'm pretty happy with the team.  Picking Manning #1 garnered some scorn, but I dare you to come up with a more reliable #1 pick than that.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Barrister on August 23, 2009, 06:39:34 PM
I may have been too defensive - I have backups at every position.  In particualar I may have picked Flacco way too early to serve as nothing more than a backup QB.  But we shall see...

If nothing else it should annoy Seedy and Neil for me to have him and not play him week after week. :lol:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 23, 2009, 06:45:49 PM
Quote from: Barrister on August 23, 2009, 06:39:34 PM
If nothing else it should annoy Seedy and Neil for me to have him and not play him week after week. :lol:
You'll regret it when Flacco puts up big numbers.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Barrister on August 23, 2009, 06:48:09 PM
Quote from: Neil on August 23, 2009, 06:45:49 PM
Quote from: Barrister on August 23, 2009, 06:39:34 PM
If nothing else it should annoy Seedy and Neil for me to have him and not play him week after week. :lol:
You'll regret it when Flacco puts up big numbers.

Bigger than Manning? :yeahright:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 23, 2009, 06:49:36 PM
Quote from: Barrister on August 23, 2009, 06:48:09 PM
Quote from: Neil on August 23, 2009, 06:45:49 PM
Quote from: Barrister on August 23, 2009, 06:39:34 PM
If nothing else it should annoy Seedy and Neil for me to have him and not play him week after week. :lol:
You'll regret it when Flacco puts up big numbers.

Bigger than Manning? :yeahright:
Definitely.  Manning had a good run, but his time is over.  You're living in the Age of Joe Flacco.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Sophie Scholl on August 23, 2009, 06:54:59 PM
Uh oh.  Career over for Flacco.  He received Neil QB taint.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Barrister on August 23, 2009, 06:58:36 PM
Quote from: Judas Iscariot on August 23, 2009, 06:54:59 PM
Uh oh.  Career over for Flacco.  He received Neil QB taint.

:yes:

I wonder how long he holds on to Boller.   :lol:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 23, 2009, 07:08:00 PM
Quote from: Judas Iscariot on August 23, 2009, 06:54:59 PM
Uh oh.  Career over for Flacco.  He received Neil QB taint.
Not true.  What about Jeff Garcia?  He's been delivering for years.

Brian Billick is the one with the taint.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Grey Fox on August 23, 2009, 07:29:38 PM
My team sucks.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Sophie Scholl on August 23, 2009, 08:03:08 PM
Quote from: Grey Fox on August 23, 2009, 07:29:38 PM
My team sucks.
I am:  Cautiously optimistic.  Now with my luck, I'll finish in last.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Barrister on August 23, 2009, 08:13:13 PM
You know even now I don't quite follow who everyone is.

Can you fill in the blanks for me?

-   Frozen Wetbacks   katmai
-   Chewable Steriods   ???
-   Fricken Lasers   ???
-   Frozen Yukoners   Barrister
-   Dallas Egos   von moltke
-   L.A. Stallions   BA
-   Fabertown Punks   ???
-   The BurgerMakers!   Mad Burger Maker
-   Gang Green   ???  (probably Vince)
-   Toothsome Logic   ???
-   Fighting Nixons   Neil
-   Puerto Rican Ninjas   Tim
-   Meh Dinks   ???
-   Dirty Danes   Leip
-   Cincy Jailbirdz   der speiss
-   Jews Kittens and U   ???  (probably Seedy)
-   Newfoundland Newfs   ???
-   ATL Punters   ???
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Grey Fox on August 23, 2009, 08:20:32 PM
-   Frozen Wetbacks   katmai
-   Chewable Steriods   Ehrie
-   Fricken Lasers   frunk
-   Frozen Yukoners   Barrister
-   Dallas Egos   von moltke
-   L.A. Stallions   BA
-   Fabertown Punks   Grey Fox
-   The BurgerMakers!   Mad Burger Maker
-   Gang Green   Vince
-   Toothsome Logic   Scipio
-   Fighting Nixons   Neil
-   Puerto Rican Ninjas   Tim
-   Meh Dinks   ???
-   Dirty Danes   Leip
-   Cincy Jailbirdz   der speiss
-   Jews Kittens and U   looks like Seedy
-   Newfoundland Newfs   Rocky
-   ATL Punters   - ???
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: ulmont on August 23, 2009, 08:22:40 PM
-   Frozen Wetbacks   katmai
-   Chewable Steriods   Ehrie
-   Fricken Lasers   frunk
-   Frozen Yukoners   Barrister
-   Dallas Egos   von moltke
-   L.A. Stallions   BA
-   Fabertown Punks   Grey Fox
-   The BurgerMakers!   Mad Burger Maker
-   Gang Green   Vince
-   Toothsome Logic   Scipio
-   Fighting Nixons   Neil
-   Puerto Rican Ninjas   Tim
-   Meh Dinks   Alci
-   Dirty Danes   Leip
-   Cincy Jailbirdz   der speiss
-   Jews Kittens and U   looks like Seedy
-   Newfoundland Newfs   Rocky
-   ATL Punters   - Ulmont
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Barrister on August 23, 2009, 08:27:17 PM
Danke.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Sophie Scholl on August 23, 2009, 08:35:36 PM
 :lol: I think I should just have Neil change my name back to Benedict Arnold, everyone still refers to me as such.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Barrister on August 23, 2009, 08:37:23 PM
So the additions from last year are Seedy and FB?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on August 23, 2009, 08:39:44 PM
Quote from: Barrister on August 23, 2009, 06:37:03 PM
The Frozen Yukoners:


I'm pretty happy with the team.  Picking Manning #1 garnered some scorn, but I dare you to come up with a more reliable #1 pick than that.
Tom Brady. :contract:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Sophie Scholl on August 23, 2009, 08:44:08 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on August 23, 2009, 08:39:44 PM
Quote from: Barrister on August 23, 2009, 06:37:03 PM
The Frozen Yukoners:


I'm pretty happy with the team.  Picking Manning #1 garnered some scorn, but I dare you to come up with a more reliable #1 pick than that.
Tom Brady. :contract:
He was untouchable after week 1 last year.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Barrister on August 23, 2009, 08:46:07 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on August 23, 2009, 08:39:44 PM
Quote from: Barrister on August 23, 2009, 06:37:03 PM
The Frozen Yukoners:


I'm pretty happy with the team.  Picking Manning #1 garnered some scorn, but I dare you to come up with a more reliable #1 pick than that.
Tom Brady. :contract:

:rolleyes:

Auto-draft gave me Tom Brady last year.  Somehow that didn't work out so well for me...
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: ulmont on August 23, 2009, 08:58:59 PM
Quote from: Barrister on August 23, 2009, 08:37:23 PM
So the additions from last year are Seedy and FB?

I was not in last year's league.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Liep on August 23, 2009, 09:28:55 PM
I have some weak spots in my team this year, especially in week 4. But Moss will come through in the end. Go Brady? :O
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Alcibiades on August 23, 2009, 09:35:58 PM
I have meh dinks....which had a horrible draft so I'm really a non-factor. :lol:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on August 23, 2009, 09:38:22 PM
Alci is Meh Dinks.

E: Well shit.  I took way too long to submit that, I guess.  :P
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: ulmont on August 23, 2009, 09:42:36 PM
Quote from: Alcibiades on August 23, 2009, 09:35:58 PM
I have meh dinks....which had a horrible draft so I'm really a non-factor. :lol:

Trust me, my draft was not the stunning glory I had hoped for.  On the other hand, I managed to avoid Plaxico.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Liep on August 23, 2009, 09:54:14 PM
Quote from: katmai on August 23, 2009, 05:35:56 PM
Happy with my team, but will be screwed if/when Rivers goes down.

Yeah, I'd say the Wetbacks are my favourite this year.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Admiral Yi on August 23, 2009, 10:53:54 PM
I'm rooting for the Dane, as a I always do.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on August 24, 2009, 08:49:35 PM
Ravens first team defense is ready for the season.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Sophie Scholl on August 24, 2009, 08:57:33 PM
Their run defense was a little suspect now and again, but they do look decent overall.  I'm digging Gruden as a commentator.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on August 24, 2009, 09:00:48 PM
Quote from: Judas Iscariot on August 24, 2009, 08:57:33 PM
Their run defense was a little suspect now and again, but they do look decent overall.  I'm digging Gruden as a commentator.

Washington makes everybody's run defense suspect.  He's a shifty little shit.
And yeah, Chucky's pretty cool to listen to.  Definitely the type of commentary persona you want on MNF.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 24, 2009, 09:18:15 PM
Quote from: Judas Iscariot on August 24, 2009, 08:57:33 PM
I'm digging Gruden as a commentator.
Indeed.  He's six trillion times better than Collinsworth.

Troy Smith is looking like your average Ohio State player in the NFL:  Total Failure On Every Down.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on August 24, 2009, 09:19:24 PM
A very interesting article from ESPN for your sucker Bengals fans out there.


(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsports.espn.go.com%2Fphoto%2F2009%2F0824%2Fnfl_e_bengalsbanner_300.jpg&hash=a9c977809f43704ea9106706cc92bacb7928878e)

QuoteBengals mired in mediocrity

GEORGETOWN, Ky. -- The revolution marches on in a lush-green field three miles from the Georgetown Scott County Airport. If the billboards and the urinal-cake campaign didn't do it, didn't stir the Cincinnati Bengals out of an 18-year slumber, surely Andrew Simon's banner will.

Simon was 8 years old the last time Cincinnati won a playoff game. Now he's a 27-year-old instigator, plunking down $1,000 for a guy named Bud to fly his single-engine prop plane over Bengals camp for an hour with a tersely worded message for team president Mike Brown. Simon's cell phone rings on an unseasonably cool Friday night during training camp. There is a problem: Bud is being denied access to the airport runway. But the fan uprising must carry on, so the plane lands near a church, and a banner that says "101-187-1 ... HIRE A GM!" is attached.

The tiny red-and-white plane manages to take off, banner in tow, and buzzes over the Bengals' scrimmage, over Brown, who's seated on a patio. By all accounts, the leader of Bengaldom is unfazed. He fixes his eyes on the football field. Another hopeful summer trudges on.

"What plane?" Bengals coach Marvin Lewis says jokingly after the flyby. "I think [Brown] feels like it's a waste of natural resources. I mean, that's all he says about it. He says, 'Well, if they've got that kind of money, they ought to buy some tickets.'"

It's hard, explaining futility, when it takes hold of a franchise for the better part of 18 years and refuses to let go. When it comes in a league built for parity and collides with a family legacy.

Members of the local media say Mike Brown talks to them only once a year, and that the son of football legend Paul Brown is somewhat of a recluse. Mike Brown is 72 years old, is one of only a handful of NFL owners to also serve as general manager, and, in the 18 years since his father's passing, has watched the team suffer through 17 non-winning seasons.

His critics say he runs the franchise like a mom-and-pop organization while corporate America crushes him. They say he doesn't have the football mind to make personnel decisions, and cares more about money than winning. They don't really know him, and Brown seems to like it that way.

He is standing at the edge of the field, near some staffers wearing T-shirts that say, "Fight Back." Like most summers, Brown is quietly hopeful. He believes this team is ready to move past its labels as dysfunctional, abysmal and occasionally criminal. Then again, he believes that every year.

"Would I have done a few things differently? Sure I would," Brown says. "But that isn't what motivates me or concerns me as much as what we can do about the next step.

"Do I think we will be perpetually down? I do not. I've seen every team in this league when it was down. And the lesson from that is you can come back and fly high."

The family legacy

You try stepping into these footsteps: Paul Brown won a national championship in his second year at Ohio State. He founded two professional teams, led the Cleveland Browns to seven titles and invented the single-bar face mask. About the only thing he didn't accomplish was becoming a lawyer -- he left law school at the age of 23 to become football coach at his hometown Massillon Washington High School football team in Ohio.

But Mike did get a law degree, after playing quarterback at Dartmouth, after following his dad around a football field at the age of 5. It was natural that Mike would immerse himself in his father's greatest passion. Bengals fans don't know this, says Jack Brennan, a former newspaper reporter in Cincinnati who now serves as the Bengals' PR director, but the younger Brown was a central -- albeit quiet -- figure in helping the city land the pro franchise in 1967.

People close to Mike say he's a throwback who would probably be more comfortable in that era, at least 40 years ago. He has been known to go canoeing in a dress shirt, a pair of khakis and fancy work shoes. "That's just Mike," a friend says, without elaborating.

The Bengals are Brown's only business interest, a family business, and kin make up more than half of the names listed in the administration section of the Bengals' Web site. His daughter, Katie Blackburn, is the team's executive vice president. Just below Mike's name on the organizational list is his brother Pete, who is senior vice president of player personnel.

When Paul ran the team, former Bengals coach Forrest Gregg says, Mike was making decisions right alongside him. They'd watch film on Mondays with the coaching staff, a rarity for men in ownership positions. Because Mike also serves as GM, it is assumed that he not only puts his final stamp on personnel decisions, but that he has an active role in evaluating players.

"It's a lot of work," says Gregg, who coached the Bengals to a Super Bowl in 1981. "I just think that he wants to be involved in the decision-making of the team. Just like [Cowboys owner] Jerry Jones. ... That's their philosophy about running the team.

"Mike knows football. He has spent his whole life in it."

In a different era, Paul Brown had his hand in just about everything. He was the Bengals' GM, principal owner and head coach for the first eight seasons. He made it to the playoffs by 1970. He had a knack for talent, plucking Boobie Clark out of Bethune-Cookman and knowing he was a perfect fit for the offense. It was before the days of massive scouting staffs, draftniks and all-night video reviews.

Would Paul Brown have been able to successfully run his team today without a GM? Would he have picked someone from the outside to help, like the family owned Steelers have done with Kevin Colbert? Only one thing is certain -- that after Brown died in 1991, the losses started to pile up. The Bengals went 52-108 in the 1990s, and were stung by draft busts.

There was the David Klingler pick in 1992, a move that was supposed to secure the team's quarterback of the future, and the Akili Smith debacle in 1999. The Bengals were offered nine draft picks for their high selection that year, but were locked into Smith, a massively talented but unproven quarterback from Oregon. Smith started just 17 games and was released in 2002.

It has been reported in various media outlets that the Bengals have only one or two scouts on staff and rely heavily on their coaches to evaluate personnel. Brown disputes that and says he has six scouts on staff.

"There's a million things you can say about [the struggles]," says Dave Lapham, a former Bengals offensive lineman under Paul Brown who is now the team's color analyst. "I don't think it's any one thing. I think everybody's clothes are dirty when something like that happens, all the way from Mike Brown to everybody in the organization all the way down to the bottom.

"You know, part of what happened, in my opinion, was that Paul Brown died. Paul Brown was a football genius. And I think Mike went through an adjustment without being able to run some things by Paul and get Paul's opinion on things."

Loyal to a fault?

He is unfailingly loyal. That, Lapham says, might be Mike Brown's biggest undoing. In a calculated world in which the New England Patriots know exactly when to cut bait, even when it means saying goodbye to loyal veterans who have toiled away on Super Bowl teams (i.e., Corey Dillon, Willie McGinest), the Bengals have been known to hold on (Chris Henry).

Brown kept his first coach, David Shula, for 4½ years as Shula compiled a 19-53 record. The Bengals have had just four different coaches during their 101-187-1 stretch during the past 18 seasons.

He's stuck with players through suspensions and despite rap sheets. The 2006 season had more players arrested (nine) than victories (eight). The most notable case was Henry, who, after arrests for driving under the influence, marijuana possession and assault during his first three seasons, was waived in April 2008. Brown said Henry had forfeited his right to be a Bengal and that his conduct couldn't be tolerated. Four months later, after a spate of injuries, Cincinnati re-signed him to a two-year contract.

"These guys aren't John Dillinger," Brown says. "Even the ones who are in the worst of troubles by our standards. But there's no question that they misstepped, and they paid a pretty severe price in a couple of places. We paid a price because we were painted with that brush. Our reputation was undercut.

"We lived through it. I think it's behind us now. I don't see them as bad people. I think they made mistakes. Some of them went elsewhere and played and nothing was said about it the minute they left here. But around here, it piled up. We had too much of it, and we suffered because of it."

From a fan's viewpoint

Simon knows all about suffering. He's standing outside a bachelor party in downtown Cincinnati on a recent Friday night, and he can see Paul Brown Stadium in the distance. He says he can't bear another season. One of his first memories was John Taylor's catch in Super Bowl XXIII, the one that capped a 92-yard 49ers' march and sealed the Bengals' loss, the one that signaled the end.

"I went every Sunday," Simon says. "I'm a very optimistic sports fan. I trusted the team. Then I started looking at what other successful teams do, what the Patriots do, the Colts do and the Steelers do. I started seeing how different it was from the way the Bengals approached things. I got more and more angry and frustrated."

Roughly 18 months ago, Simon started the Who Dey Revolution, a blog that he says is dedicated to demanding comprehensive reform to the decisions and approach of Bengals management. Last year, his group placed hundreds of urinal cakes in the restrooms at Paul Brown Stadium as part of a "Put Your Yellow on Brown" campaign. The small orange cakes had Brown's record printed on them along with the words, "Get Pissed."

Who Dey, by the way, is the chant that fans used to shout during the franchise's glory days of the 1980s. It goes, Who dey! Who dey! Who dey think gonna beat dem Bengals? NOBODY!

Simon hates it, the fact the answer to that question nowadays is EVERYBODY.

Simon is a business student, and he knows all about strategic advertising. That's why he took $19 donations -- a dollar for every year Brown has been team president -- and booked several airplane flybys during camp with different messages pointed directly at Brown. He wanted the banners to be shown on HBO's "Hard Knocks," which picked Cincinnati as this year's camp destination.

Maybe then, he thought, his message would get out to the people. In the first two weeks of the series, the Who Deys were ignored.

Hope returns each season

There's a story behind the numbers, the Bengals insist. Yes, they've had just one winning season in 18, and haven't sniffed a playoff win since the 1990 season. But four of those 18 years ended 8-8, two more were 7-9, and 2005 could've erased all of it.

Cincinnati was one of the hottest teams in the NFL in '05, went 11-5 under quarterback Carson Palmer and had home-field advantage for a playoff game against Pittsburgh. Just after Palmer uncorked his first pass of the day, a 66-yarder, he crumpled to the ground after defensive end Kimo von Oelhoffen rolled into his knee. The Steelers went on to win the Super Bowl; the Bengals slithered back into mediocrity.

The team goes where Palmer goes, Brown says, and that's why Palmer's elbow injury last year was so devastating. The Bengals finished 4-11-1. Lewis likes to coin a preseason theme for each season. The 2008 theme was "Now."

But the sun is still warm, and there is hope for a new season. Palmer is back and mentoring everyone from the rookies to the Twitter-happy Chad Ochocinco. When the cameras are rolling, the team has made a point to show its new and scrubbed-up side.

"I've been here for seven years," Palmer says. "This is the best this team's been mentally going into camp. They're excited, hungry, and ready to work, knowing that we have a lot of work ahead of us.

"It's a lot better group of guys. A lot of family guys, a lot of guys that are professionals and understand how lucky we are to have these jobs and how lucky we are to be able to come and do what we do for work every day."

Will it finally be enough to turn around Bengaldom? Brown believes it is every year. The horn sounds near the end of practice, and Brown is ready to cut off the interview. Actually, he's ready to cut it off after the first minute.

One question makes him light up for a second. He's asked about the biggest lesson his father taught him.

"I think there are over 1,000 answers to it," he says. "And yet if I were to tell you one thing I remember ... It was that you just got up every day and you went about what you did and you did the best you could do, and it didn't matter what was going sideways or what was going up.

"You could be riding high or you could be low. But you'd better go out there and persevere."

Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: callmeclemens on August 25, 2009, 05:48:32 PM
Dear Mark Sanchez,
Why did you let Kellen Clemens out perform you last night? Hell you pretty much let Eric Ainge out perform you?

Dear New York Jets,
Please get Rex Grossman, if we're going to suck really hard this season can we atleast pretend fundamentals don't exsist at the quarterback position?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on August 25, 2009, 05:58:34 PM
I'm prepared for another year of mediocrity.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on August 25, 2009, 06:01:05 PM
Quote from: Ed Anger on August 25, 2009, 05:58:34 PM
I'm prepared for another year of mediocrity.
Wow, you're optimistic about the Bengals chances!  :D
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadImmortalMan on August 25, 2009, 06:03:15 PM
We need to move a team to Vegas. That would revitalize the league. The Dallas Cowboys' cheerleaders would have nothing on Vegas. They could only show the games on pay-per-view.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on August 25, 2009, 06:03:18 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on August 25, 2009, 06:01:05 PM
Quote from: Ed Anger on August 25, 2009, 05:58:34 PM
I'm prepared for another year of mediocrity.
Wow, you're optimistic about the Bengals chances!  :D

I see no reason to get my hopes up. Ravens and Steelers are going to rape them in the division.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on August 25, 2009, 06:04:05 PM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on August 25, 2009, 06:03:15 PM
We need to move a team to Vegas. That would revitalize the league. The Dallas Cowboys' cheerleaders would have nothing on Vegas. They could only show the games on pay-per-view.

I think the new UFL has a Vegas team. But it is going to be like the XFL: Hilariously bad.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Vince on August 25, 2009, 06:21:07 PM
Quote from: callmeclemens on August 25, 2009, 05:48:32 PM
Dear Mark Sanchez,
Why did you let Kellen Clemens out perform you last night? Hell you pretty much let Eric Ainge out perform you?

Dear New York Jets,
Please get Rex Grossman, if we're going to suck really hard this season can we atleast pretend fundamentals don't exsist at the quarterback position?

Had to DVR the game because I had class so I haven't seen it yet but I expected Sanchez to get his ass handed to him since this is the Ravens we're talking about.  Unless KC stages a major comeback Sanchez is probably still going to start in the opener. 
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 25, 2009, 07:08:56 PM
Quote from: callmeclemens on August 25, 2009, 05:48:32 PM
Dear Mark Sanchez,
Why did you let Kellen Clemens out perform you last night? Hell you pretty much let Eric Ainge out perform you?
He played the first team D.  Clemens and Ainge were playing the second-stringers and guys who won't make the team.  That's why I'm not worried that the Ravens' special teams play looked like a bunch of limp-dicked faggots last night.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: citizen k on August 26, 2009, 01:40:15 AM
Seahawks sign Edgerrin James for one year contract.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: callmeclemens on August 26, 2009, 07:37:59 AM
Quote from: Vince on August 25, 2009, 06:21:07 PM



Had to DVR the game because I had class so I haven't seen it yet but I expected Sanchez to get his ass handed to him since this is the Ravens we're talking about.  Unless KC stages a major comeback Sanchez is probably still going to start in the opener.



His first pass was a pick six. There's no way In hell we can give this team back to Kellen, does anyone Remember Thanksgiving 07? 34-3.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: callmeclemens on August 26, 2009, 07:41:25 AM
Has anyone heard the Names of the UFL Teams:
Las Vega Locamotives
New York Sentinals
San Fransisco Rock Fish
Orlando Tuskers
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Grey Fox on August 26, 2009, 07:55:39 AM
It's the California Redwoods
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Valmy on August 26, 2009, 07:57:28 AM
Quote from: callmeclemens on August 26, 2009, 07:41:25 AM
Has anyone heard the Names of the UFL Teams:
Las Vega Locamotives
New York Sentinals
San Fransisco Rock Fish
Orlando Tuskers

No and I anticipate this will be the last time I hear them.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: derspiess on August 26, 2009, 08:34:25 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on August 24, 2009, 09:19:24 PM
A very interesting article from ESPN for your sucker Bengals fans out there.

Yeah I mentioned the banner guy before.  He may have a point, but he needs to get a life.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Valmy on August 26, 2009, 08:38:15 AM
Quote from: Ed Anger on August 25, 2009, 06:03:18 PM
I see no reason to get my hopes up. Ravens and Steelers are going to rape them in the division.

With Cedric Benson carrying the ball you are destined to always lose to Oklahoma....I mean destined for glory.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on August 26, 2009, 08:40:06 AM
Quote from: Valmy on August 26, 2009, 08:38:15 AM
Quote from: Ed Anger on August 25, 2009, 06:03:18 PM
I see no reason to get my hopes up. Ravens and Steelers are going to rape them in the division.

With Cedric Benson carrying the ball you are destined to always lose to Oklahoma....I mean destined for glory.

Every Bengals fan seems to think he is young Corey Dillon and young Rudi Johnson reborn.  :huh:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: derspiess on August 26, 2009, 08:54:23 AM
Quote from: Ed Anger on August 26, 2009, 08:40:06 AM
Every Bengals fan seems to think he is young Corey Dillon and young Rudi Johnson reborn.  :huh:

That's one guy my brother doesn't talk up too much.  Not sure why.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Savonarola on August 26, 2009, 09:11:31 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on August 24, 2009, 09:19:24 PM


Bengals mired in mediocrity

Some teams have all the luck.   :(
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on August 26, 2009, 09:16:20 AM
Quote from: derspiess on August 26, 2009, 08:54:23 AM
Quote from: Ed Anger on August 26, 2009, 08:40:06 AM
Every Bengals fan seems to think he is young Corey Dillon and young Rudi Johnson reborn.  :huh:

That's one guy my brother doesn't talk up too much.  Not sure why.

Cedric was lazy with the Bears.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: callmeclemens on August 26, 2009, 11:08:49 AM
NFL.com Reports Bucs are dealing either Leftwich or McCown.
My best guess is McCown. Any other idea's
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Vince on August 26, 2009, 01:16:11 PM
Quote from: callmeclemens on August 26, 2009, 07:37:59 AMHis first pass was a pick six. There's no way In hell we can give this team back to Kellen, does anyone Remember Thanksgiving 07? 34-3.

To be fair the week before the Dallas Thanksgiving Turkey Shoot the Jets upset the Steelers.  Nobody at QB that year would've done well in 2007 with that surrounding cast.

But I digress...Sanchez is now the starter.  Let's see what the kid can do.  Per ESPN:

QuoteWhat the football world expected became reality Wednesday when the Jets' quarterbacks were informed that Mark Sanchez is the new starter.

Uncharted Territory

No Jets rookie started the first game of a season since Dick Jamieson started the first game in franchise history in 1960 when the Jets were known as the New York Titans.

The last Jets rookie QB to start a game was Matt Robinson on Nov. 27, 1977 at home against Pittsburgh.

So when Sanchez starts in Week 1, he'll do something even Joe Namath didn't do. Namath made his first start as a rookie in the Jets' third game of the 1965 season.

Rookie pass attempts by Jets QBs drafted in first round:
Year    Quarterback    Attempts
2009    Mark Sanchez    ?
2000    Chad Pennington    5
1983    Ken O'Brien    0
1976    Richard Todd    162
1965    Joe Namath    340
1962    Sandy Stephens    0
Source: ESPN Stats & Information

Sanchez will start the Jets' third preseason game Saturday night against the New York Giants -- and, more importantly, the team's regular-season opener at Houston against the Texans.

"I feel that the best move for our franchise and our team is to go with Mark as our quarterback," Jets first-year head coach Rex Ryan said Wednesday.

It wasn't a question of if Sanchez would be named the starter, but when. Even though he struggled some against the Baltimore Ravens on Monday night, the Jets have seen enough moxie and talent from Sanchez to make this year's fifth overall pick the face of the franchise.

"I think Mark gives us the best opportunity to win," Ryan said.

The designation of Sanchez as the Jets' starter was first reported by FoxSports.com.

The Jets traded up in the draft to select Sanchez, who was signed to a five-year deal that could be worth up to $60 million, including $28 million guaranteed.

Vying to become the Jets' starter, Sanchez, drafted out of Southern California, got off to a wretched start Monday night but finished with a flourish in a 24-23 preseason loss.

Starting for the first time, Sanchez handed off the ball on the game's opening play from scrimmage. Then he forced a pass while being hit in the stomach by middle linebacker Ray Lewis. The ball was intercepted by Haloti Ngata, who rumbled 25 yards for a touchdown to make it 7-0 with 52 seconds elapsed.

"Not obviously the way you want to start. I thought I was doing the right thing; I felt Ray come free on the right side from the protection," Sanchez said. "I was checking it down to the flat, perfect. Haloti just jumped right in front of the ball and made a really athletic play."

Mike and Mike in the Morning

ESPN NFL analyst Chris Mortensen confirms the news that Mark Sanchez has won the starting QB job with the Jets. Plus, he goes over other QB battles and talks about the Cowboys' stadium issue.

More Podcasts »

Sanchez nearly had his second pass picked off, too. On his final play, however, he threw his first NFL touchdown pass -- a 19-yarder to running back Leon Washington with 5:50 left in the second quarter.

Sanchez went 3-for-8 for 43 yards. He didn't experience success until the Ravens removed several players from the first-team defense, including Lewis and safety Ed Reed.

Ryan spent the previous 10 years building the Baltimore defense, but there was no way he could fully explain to Sanchez the experience of going up against the wickedly effective unit.

"You put a young guy like Sanchez in there and you see our defense, it can be difficult," Lewis said. "You saw his eyes get big, and he was jumping around in the pocket. Bottom line: We gave a lot of looks and disguises and we confused him a little bit."

To say the least.

AFC East blog

Graham ESPN.com's Tim Graham writes about all things AFC East in his division blog.

• Blog network: NFL Nation

"Oh, they were flying. They were flying around," Sanchez said. "You practice for it and you see it on film. These guys were doing it. You're trying to keep one eye on Ed Reed and one eye on Ray Lewis and a D-lineman gets you."

Clemens, who started New York's other exhibition game, was 5-for-10 for 60 yards. Like Sanchez, he had an interception returned for a touchdown and threw a TD pass (a 28-yarder to David Clowney in the third quarter).

Sanchez finally started to move the offense on his final drive Monday night. A short pass to Washington on a third-and-12 went for 16 yards, and a run by Washington for 15 yards on a third-and-10 set up the TD pass.

"I'm proud of the way he responded," Ryan said of Sanchez. "It ain't going to be perfect; sometimes you have these type of nights. You've got to give credit where credit is due, and most of that goes to their defense."
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: derspiess on August 26, 2009, 04:24:50 PM
Quote from: Vince on August 26, 2009, 01:16:11 PM
But I digress...Sanchez is now the starter.  Let's see what the kid can do.  Per ESPN:

Hopefully he's still alive in Week 17 when they play the Bungles :D
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on August 26, 2009, 04:28:33 PM
Just picked up Edgerin James for LFFL.  :cool:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: derspiess on August 26, 2009, 04:47:04 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on August 26, 2009, 04:28:33 PM
Just picked up Edgerin James for LFFL.  :cool:

Sucker...
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on August 26, 2009, 05:11:52 PM
Quote from: derspiess on August 26, 2009, 04:47:04 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on August 26, 2009, 04:28:33 PM
Just picked up Edgerin James for LFFL.  :cool:

Sucker...

Not bad for a backup.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Vince on August 26, 2009, 06:00:00 PM
Quote from: derspiess on August 26, 2009, 04:24:50 PM
Quote from: Vince on August 26, 2009, 01:16:11 PM
But I digress...Sanchez is now the starter.  Let's see what the kid can do.  Per ESPN:

Hopefully he's still alive in Week 17 when they play the Bungles :D

I've suffered through multiple seasons of the Jets resorting to their fourth and fifth stringers at QB. 

Another year of that wouldn't surprise me.   :P
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Sophie Scholl on August 26, 2009, 06:56:19 PM
Vince, we should organize a Utica Languish meetup for October 25th to watch the Raiders and Jets game.  Got a preferred sports bar in the area?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on August 26, 2009, 08:31:21 PM
Cable Bumaye!

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4424500&campaign=rss&source=NFLHeadlines
QuotePolice: Cable will be questioned

Updated: August 26, 2009, 6:16 PM ET
By Colleen Dominguez
ESPN

The Napa, Calif., police department plans to question Oakland Raiders coach Tom Cable about his alleged role in a skirmish that left assistant coach Randy Hanson with a broken bone in his face.

A department spokesperson said Wednesday that Cable would be interviewed as part of the ongoing investigation in the near future, but a date was not specified.

The department has been contacted by NFL security and said it is cooperating with the league, the spokesperson said.

Hanson was hospitalized following the Aug. 5 attack that he told police was initiated by a member of the Raiders coaching staff at the team's training camp hotel in Napa. According to reports, Cable attacked Hanson during a meeting with some of the team's defensive coaches.

Last week, Cable said "nothing happened."

"When all the facts come out, everything will be fine," he said.

Hanson has spoken to Napa police and has not been seen at Raiders camp since the incident. The case was initially closed and then reopened Friday when Hanson agreed to cooperate with authorities.

"Hanson's future with the team is currently being addressed," a Raiders executive said Wednesday.

Meanwhile, Hanson has retained an attorney specializing in employment law, potentially signaling yet another lawsuit for team owner Al Davis, who's already locked in a legal battle with former Oakland coach Lane Kiffin.

Collen Dominguez is a reporter for ESPN. Information from The Associated Press was used in this report.

Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on August 27, 2009, 05:43:34 AM
A photo the Jest fans should get used to, since this is what their season will usually look like.

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.baltimoresun.com%2Fmedia%2Fphoto%2F2009-08%2F48846022.jpg&hash=9082636fa4ab5629b99621ce711aa671cecbd11b)

J-E-S-T JEST JEST JEST
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Vince on August 27, 2009, 11:12:12 AM
Seedy I'll be the first person to tell you the Jets will probably start 0-4 since they play Houston, NE, Tennessee and New Orleans. 

Worse still I found out the QB position coach for Sanchez on the Jets is the same guy that was the position coach for Kyle Boller on the Ravens.   :pinch:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on August 27, 2009, 11:55:57 AM
Yeah right.  The Houston secondary is about as creampuff as they get, and the run D is questionable at best so far.  Good confidence builder for Sanchez (unless Mario Williams gets to him and kills him, I guess) and the Jets.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Grey Fox on August 27, 2009, 08:40:02 PM
I guess Joe Buck & Troy Aikman had really nothing to say in the last 30mins or so.

Freaking Rain Delay, this is football!
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: JacobL on August 27, 2009, 09:36:42 PM
Lightning delay :P
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on August 28, 2009, 07:02:54 AM
Carson really should have chosen his local endorsements more carefully:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qui334kzeTE&feature=player_embedded

Also, you fuckers will have less of me to worry about on Sunday, as the wife ordered DirectTV and got me the NFL package. I'll be asleep in front of 12 games a week this year.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Vince on August 28, 2009, 09:07:39 AM
Quote from: Ed Anger on August 28, 2009, 07:02:54 AM
Also, you fuckers will have less of me to worry about on Sunday, as the wife ordered DirectTV and got me the NFL package. I'll be asleep in front of 12 games a week this year.

You got Superfan with that, right? 
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on August 28, 2009, 09:10:45 AM
Quote from: Vince on August 28, 2009, 09:07:39 AM
Quote from: Ed Anger on August 28, 2009, 07:02:54 AM
Also, you fuckers will have less of me to worry about on Sunday, as the wife ordered DirectTV and got me the NFL package. I'll be asleep in front of 12 games a week this year.

You got Superfan with that, right?

Whatever the 300 dollar package is. Sunday Ticket.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Valmy on August 28, 2009, 09:16:12 AM
Quote from: Ed Anger on August 28, 2009, 07:02:54 AM
Also, you fuckers will have less of me to worry about on Sunday, as the wife ordered DirectTV and got me the NFL package. I'll be asleep in front of 12 games a week this year.

Your wife must really love you...or must really want to get rid of you every Sunday.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on August 28, 2009, 09:18:32 AM
Quote from: Valmy on August 28, 2009, 09:16:12 AM
Quote from: Ed Anger on August 28, 2009, 07:02:54 AM
Also, you fuckers will have less of me to worry about on Sunday, as the wife ordered DirectTV and got me the NFL package. I'll be asleep in front of 12 games a week this year.

Your wife must really love you...or must really want to get rid of you every Sunday.

For her lesbian threesomes. yeah.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 28, 2009, 02:56:33 PM
Quote from: Ed Anger on August 28, 2009, 09:10:45 AM
Quote from: Vince on August 28, 2009, 09:07:39 AM
Quote from: Ed Anger on August 28, 2009, 07:02:54 AM
Also, you fuckers will have less of me to worry about on Sunday, as the wife ordered DirectTV and got me the NFL package. I'll be asleep in front of 12 games a week this year.

You got Superfan with that, right?

Whatever the 300 dollar package is. Sunday Ticket.
$300?  Sunday Ticket is only $160 in Canada, and those are with Canadian dollars.

I know this because I got mine set up Wednesday night.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on August 28, 2009, 03:04:52 PM
Quote from: Neil on August 28, 2009, 02:56:33 PM
Quote from: Ed Anger on August 28, 2009, 09:10:45 AM
Quote from: Vince on August 28, 2009, 09:07:39 AM
Quote from: Ed Anger on August 28, 2009, 07:02:54 AM
Also, you fuckers will have less of me to worry about on Sunday, as the wife ordered DirectTV and got me the NFL package. I'll be asleep in front of 12 games a week this year.

You got Superfan with that, right?

Whatever the 300 dollar package is. Sunday Ticket.
$300?  Sunday Ticket is only $160 in Canada, and those are with Canadian dollars.

I know this because I got mine set up Wednesday night.

I better check my bill.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on August 28, 2009, 03:07:46 PM
Yep, 300 bucks. We got 5 months of the all the channels TV package for free for ordering it. Which is 60/month.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Grey Fox on August 28, 2009, 04:07:03 PM
Neil and Ed, the Canadian package is cheaper because half of it is paid by your provider. Probably because you have to sign up for atleast 1 year.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: derspiess on August 28, 2009, 04:16:22 PM
Quote from: Ed Anger on August 28, 2009, 07:02:54 AM
Carson really should have chosen his local endorsements more carefully:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qui334kzeTE&feature=player_embedded

Yeah, he should've gone with Bluegrass sausage or Glier's Goetta. 

Anyway, at least he's not doing those horrible commercials Archie Griffin was doing for that local college.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 28, 2009, 06:33:16 PM
Quote from: Grey Fox on August 28, 2009, 04:07:03 PM
Neil and Ed, the Canadian package is cheaper because half of it is paid by your provider. Probably because you have to sign up for atleast 1 year.
What?

You're telling me that Shaw is paying $140 out of their own pocket in order to get me NFL Sunday Ticket?  I very much doubt that.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: callmeclemens on August 28, 2009, 07:39:07 PM
Direct Tv has a really sweet loop hole, atleast it's good for me.
I just have them make my local channels New York channels, though I don't live in New York.

All this to watch the Jets lose for 4 months, then watch good morning new york the rest of the year.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Strix on August 29, 2009, 11:20:11 AM
Quote from: CBSSportslineBrady tosses two TDs before leaving with sore shoulder; Pats win
   
LANDOVER, Md. -- Officially, Tom Brady has a "sore shoulder," the result of being crushed to the turf by massive Albert Haynesworth. It caused enough discomfort for him to spend quite a while on the bench flexing and rotating his throwing arm, trying to work out whatever kinks where there.

It could be nothing. It could be something. Actually, anything that involves Brady is always something, especially in a season in which he's trying to come back from a major knee injury.

Brady hurt his shoulder in the New England Patriots' 27-24 victory over the Washington Redskins on Friday night. It was late in the first half when he was pressed to the ground by All-Pro defensive tackle Haynesworth after a third down incomplete pass.

"Anytime someone 350 pounds falls on him, it's going to hurt him," New England right tackle Matt Light said. "You just know it's part of the game, and Tom's been through it before and you know he can take it."

Brady went to the bench, where he stretched his arm repeatedly as the half came to a close and again after returning from the locker room after halftime.

Brady did not play in the second half, even though most of the first-team offense returned for the first drive of the third quarter. He then left the sideline and returned to the locker room.

In the fourth quarter, the Patriots announced Brady's injury as a sore shoulder, a diagnosis that gave coach Bill Belichick a twitch in his both of his shoulders. The Patriots coach was his classic self, displaying the annoyed shrug so familiar when anyone asks him about an injury. Despite the team's announcement, Belichick said Brady had only "some bumps and bruises, just like everybody else who played in the game." He also said that he had not planned for Brady to play any of the second half.

Brady did not speak to reporters after the game.

If one assumes Brady is fine, he has to feel good about his performance. He and counterpart Jason Campbell put on a regular season show in preseason, combining for 359 yards, six scoring drives and no interceptions.

In the game that traditionally serves as the dress rehearsal for the real stuff that begins in two weeks, Brady went 12 for 19 passes for 150 yards and two touchdowns. Randy Moss had his way with the Redskins secondary, catching six passes for 90 yards and both of Brady's TDs.

Campbell had been feeling the heat after a 4-for-13 start to the preseason, including 1 for 7 last week, with no touchdowns in either game from the first-team offense. On Friday, he played the first half and first drive of the second half, finishing a hot-and-cold 13 for 22 for 209 yards.

Asked if he'd answered his critics, Campbell said: "It's never enough. It will be something. Next week it will be that he didn't hit the big ball to Santana [Moss]."

He paused for a beat, laughed and said: "Nah, I was just joking. It really doesn't bother me at all."

Campbell went 4 for 4 on the opening drive, then had three straight three-and-outs before another scoring drive that featured a 73-yard completion to tight end Chris Cooley, who kept his balance along the sideline to take the ball inside the 10. Campbell finished the drive with a 4-yard run after a nice move that faked out linebacker Paris Lenon.

"I was very pleased," coach Jim Zorn said. "He was very much into the game. He was competing hard and doing the things that you want. We missed on a couple of long ones, but he came back and was running the show."

Brady and Campbell played to a 17-17 draw. Then came the backups -- and a trio of interceptions -- before the game was decided by Stephen Gostkowski's 31-yard field goal with 8 seconds remaining.

New England's Kevin O'Connell, contending for the No. 2 job, was intercepted twice. Washington's Colt Brennan, trying to stay on the roster, was picked off for the third straight game, this one returned 99 yards for a touchdown by Jonathan Wilhite. Brennan helped redeem himself with a 33-yard touchdown pass to rookie Marko Mitchell, who moved closer to securing a roster spot as the No. 5 receiver.

Tim felt a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced. I fear something terrible has happened in Patriotard land.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on August 29, 2009, 11:44:03 AM
He's fine.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on August 29, 2009, 01:02:42 PM
I felt a thrill when a giant black man fell on Tom Brady.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on August 29, 2009, 01:05:16 PM
Quote from: Ed Anger on August 29, 2009, 01:02:42 PM
I felt a thrill when a giant black man fell on Tom Brady.

He'll just be listed "probable - shoulder" for the rest of the year.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on August 29, 2009, 02:29:43 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on August 29, 2009, 01:05:16 PM
Quote from: Ed Anger on August 29, 2009, 01:02:42 PM
I felt a thrill when a giant black man fell on Tom Brady.

He'll just be listed "probable - shoulder" for the rest of the year.

Stop ruining my thrills. You are a worse buzzkill than Beeb. Fag.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Valmy on August 29, 2009, 02:56:18 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on August 29, 2009, 11:44:03 AM
He's fine.

We will see what you say when he is out for the year in week 1 again.

Face it: Brady is becoming old.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: PDH on August 29, 2009, 02:58:28 PM
Brady should have never married that Brazilian Transsexual, it ruined his career.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on August 29, 2009, 02:58:47 PM
Quote from: PDH on August 29, 2009, 02:58:28 PM
Brady should have never married that Brazilian Transsexual, it ruined his career.

Brady does love the cock.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Sophie Scholl on August 29, 2009, 03:02:46 PM
He's no Peyton "Iron" Manning.  He's turning into "Glass Joe" Brady.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on August 29, 2009, 03:05:33 PM
Quote from: Valmy on August 29, 2009, 02:56:18 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on August 29, 2009, 11:44:03 AM
He's fine.

We will see what you say when he is out for the year in week 1 again.

Face it: Brady is becoming old.

I don't know why you guys are making such a big deal over this, if it was the regular season he would have played the 2nd half.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: sbr on August 29, 2009, 06:59:53 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on August 29, 2009, 03:05:33 PM
Quote from: Valmy on August 29, 2009, 02:56:18 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on August 29, 2009, 11:44:03 AM
He's fine.

We will see what you say when he is out for the year in week 1 again.

Face it: Brady is becoming old.
You better be right, I just drafted him in my fantasy league.
I don't know why you guys are making such a big deal over this, if it was the regular season he would have played the 2nd half.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Liep on August 29, 2009, 07:19:56 PM
Quote from: sbr on August 29, 2009, 06:59:53 PM
You better be right, I just drafted him in my fantasy league.

According to the tweets you should be fine, though, if tweets ever did something right I never heard about it.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 29, 2009, 10:25:33 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on August 29, 2009, 11:44:03 AM
He's fine.
You wish.  It's all over for you.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on August 30, 2009, 07:02:44 AM
The Ravens first team defense has only allowed 3 total points in 3 preseason games.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Strix on August 30, 2009, 10:32:47 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on August 30, 2009, 07:02:44 AM
The Ravens first team defense has only allowed 3 total points in 3 preseason games.

Now you know how it feels to be the NIT Champion in College Basketball.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 30, 2009, 11:00:34 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on August 30, 2009, 07:02:44 AM
The Ravens first team defense has only allowed 3 total points in 3 preseason games.
And Flacco's looking good too.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Syt on August 30, 2009, 11:16:44 AM
I've been looking at NFL.com's online video subscription. However, as I get 3 or 4 live matches per week during the regular season on ESPN I guess I'll skip their "bargain" 240 USD offer.

And slightly OT: Can someone recommend me a college team to root for?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on August 30, 2009, 12:12:29 PM
Quote from: Syt on August 30, 2009, 11:16:44 AM
I've been looking at NFL.com's online video subscription. However, as I get 3 or 4 live matches per week during the regular season on ESPN I guess I'll skip their "bargain" 240 USD offer.

And slightly OT: Can someone recommend me a college team to root for?

1) Please don't call them 'matches'. thanks.

2) College teams. USC, Alabama, Florida, Ohio State, Penn State, Notre Dame, Texas, Oklahoma. You can't go wrong with the established powers.

Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Barrister on August 30, 2009, 12:14:08 PM
Quote from: Syt on August 30, 2009, 11:16:44 AM
I've been looking at NFL.com's online video subscription. However, as I get 3 or 4 live matches per week during the regular season on ESPN I guess I'll skip their "bargain" 240 USD offer.

And slightly OT: Can someone recommend me a college team to root for?

The thing about NCAA teams is that there are over 100.

Don't you have a sister or something in Pittsburgh - maybe cheer for Pitt?

Maybe good ole Notre Dame?  It has a huge following so gets tons of coverage (the one team, Notre Dame, has an exclusive deal with NBC.  NBC only broadcasts Notre Dame games).  But it's been pretty mediocre, which is both good and bad.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Admiral Yi on August 30, 2009, 12:29:04 PM
Quote from: Syt on August 30, 2009, 11:16:44 AM
And slightly OT: Can someone recommend me a college team to root for?
Olde skool: Penn State.

Glitz and glam: Texas Tech.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Strix on August 30, 2009, 12:37:58 PM
Syracuse is a good school!

A bit down on their luck lately but a new coach, so they can only get better. They have a good history with a lot of ex-NFL players and HoFers plus a National Title. They aren't a popular bandwagon choice so you won't get razzed for that.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on August 30, 2009, 01:03:22 PM
Quote from: Strix on August 30, 2009, 10:32:47 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on August 30, 2009, 07:02:44 AM
The Ravens first team defense has only allowed 3 total points in 3 preseason games.

Now you know how it feels to be the NIT Champion in College Basketball.

Keep talking, Rapistburger.  Santonio Holmes still hasn't broken the plane of the endzone, or put his other foot down in Tampa. 
There will be a reckoning.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on August 30, 2009, 01:07:47 PM
Quote from: Syt on August 30, 2009, 11:16:44 AM
However, as I get 3 or 4 live matches per week

:bleeding:

QuoteAnd slightly OT: Can someone recommend me a college team to root for?

Definitely not Ohio State.  Too gay.  Unless you like to wear bright red gay sweater vests and lose on the road.  Or suck massive cock.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Syt on August 30, 2009, 01:14:01 PM
Quote from: Barrister on August 30, 2009, 12:14:08 PM
Quote from: Syt on August 30, 2009, 11:16:44 AM
I've been looking at NFL.com's online video subscription. However, as I get 3 or 4 live matches per week during the regular season on ESPN I guess I'll skip their "bargain" 240 USD offer.

And slightly OT: Can someone recommend me a college team to root for?

The thing about NCAA teams is that there are over 100.

Don't you have a sister or something in Pittsburgh - maybe cheer for Pitt?

Maybe good ole Notre Dame?  It has a huge following so gets tons of coverage (the one team, Notre Dame, has an exclusive deal with NBC.  NBC only broadcasts Notre Dame games).  But it's been pretty mediocre, which is both good and bad.

Yeah, her husband is a native Pittsburgher. However, Panthers don't get any coverage here. Guess I'll stick with the Pittsburgh support, though. :)
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Syt on August 30, 2009, 01:14:24 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on August 30, 2009, 01:07:47 PM
Quote from: Syt on August 30, 2009, 11:16:44 AM
However, as I get 3 or 4 live matches per week

:bleeding:

What? Lack of coverage? Or use of "match"?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on August 30, 2009, 01:17:36 PM
Quote from: Syt on August 30, 2009, 01:14:24 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on August 30, 2009, 01:07:47 PM
Quote from: Syt on August 30, 2009, 11:16:44 AM
However, as I get 3 or 4 live matches per week

:bleeding:

What? Lack of coverage? Or use of "match"?

MATCH MATCH MATCH

Let's see...you're German, and there is a traditional German settlement history that would cover Penn State, Wisconsin or Iowa. 
None of these teams kill Jews though and only one team wears black, so root for Iowa.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on August 30, 2009, 01:42:06 PM
My scarlet sweater vest is stylish. And isn't worn out in public. Or much at all.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on August 30, 2009, 01:43:39 PM
Quote from: Ed Anger on August 30, 2009, 01:42:06 PM
My scarlet sweater vest is stylish. And isn't worn out in public. Or much at all.

Eat shit and die.  I hope your wife gets assraped by Mike Tomczak.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Valmy on August 30, 2009, 02:02:44 PM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on August 30, 2009, 12:29:04 PM
Olde skool: Penn State.

Glitz and glam: Texas Tech.

Texas Tech?  Have you ever been to Lubbock?  Nay the Glitz and Glam resides in Austin Texas.  Root for Texas Syt you know you want to.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Admiral Yi on August 30, 2009, 02:07:18 PM
Quote from: Valmy on August 30, 2009, 02:02:44 PM
Have you ever been to Lubbock?
I doubt Syt has either.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on August 30, 2009, 02:29:50 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on August 30, 2009, 01:43:39 PM
Quote from: Ed Anger on August 30, 2009, 01:42:06 PM
My scarlet sweater vest is stylish. And isn't worn out in public. Or much at all.

Eat shit and die.  I hope your wife gets assraped by Mike Tomczak.

She might enjoy that.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on August 30, 2009, 02:32:57 PM
I seem to remember Sweetass mentioning a sister at Ft. Riley. So, maybe Kansas? Mangino will eat your soul.



(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi79.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fj141%2FECKoolAid%2Flolsports%2Fsorry-but-no.jpg&hash=a4ff468c415d174fe947fd1cd6716dc7bea6b9be)
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Syt on August 30, 2009, 02:40:12 PM
Quote from: Ed Anger on August 30, 2009, 02:32:57 PM
I seem to remember Sweetass mentioning a sister at Ft. Riley. So, maybe Kansas? Mangino will eat your soul.



(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi79.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fj141%2FECKoolAid%2Flolsports%2Fsorry-but-no.jpg&hash=a4ff468c415d174fe947fd1cd6716dc7bea6b9be)

The deployment history of her husband since the 1980s: Germany, Ft. Knox, South Korea, El Paso, Germany, Ft. Bragg, Ft. Sill. He's retired now and works as IT guy in his hometown of Pittsburgh.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on August 30, 2009, 02:43:10 PM
I just wanted to post the mangino pic. And baby mangino.

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fscoringathome.files.wordpress.com%2F2008%2F11%2F20081105babymangino.jpg&hash=e1a1d543c3869a2f7203ae550c0cb0cbf3fbbb00)

Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: sbr on August 30, 2009, 03:09:43 PM
The Oregon Ducks are a fun team to root for.  They usually have enough talent to think they could challenge USC for the Pac-10 title, only to find some fun new way to not do so.  Knee injuries to Dennis Dixon (and all sorts of other injury problems, usually to the 1,2 and 3 string QB in successive weeks), blowing 20 point 2nd half leads to Stanford at home, heart breaking soul crushing losses to the arch rival Beavers.  It is really an entertaining way to spend an autumn. :cry:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Kleves on August 30, 2009, 03:55:08 PM
Root for UW. They have nowhere to go but up.  :)
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: JacobL on August 30, 2009, 04:12:44 PM
   Patriots waived QB Kevin O'Connell.
O'Connell probably won't pass through waivers unclaimed, but he's getting a dose of reality after a horrific preseason. The 94th overall pick in 2008 completed just 46% of his passes in three appearances, with a minuscule 4.1 YPA and two picks to no touchdowns. It's a breath of fresh air that New England admitted this mistake so early. Most teams would've waited for a "light" to flip on with a third-round pick. The Pats knew it wasn't happening.

Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Strix on August 30, 2009, 04:20:53 PM
Quote from: JacobL on August 30, 2009, 04:12:44 PM
   Patriots waived QB Kevin O'Connell.
O'Connell probably won't pass through waivers unclaimed, but he's getting a dose of reality after a horrific preseason. The 94th overall pick in 2008 completed just 46% of his passes in three appearances, with a minuscule 4.1 YPA and two picks to no touchdowns. It's a breath of fresh air that New England admitted this mistake so early. Most teams would've waited for a "light" to flip on with a third-round pick. The Pats knew it wasn't happening.

Be honest here. Brady's injury scared the shit out of Patriot's management. They are scrambling to find a decent back-up who may end up starting some games. O'Connell and Walter just won't cut it.

It makes me wonder just how bad Brady's shoulder got hurt.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on August 30, 2009, 04:25:02 PM
Quote from: Strix on August 30, 2009, 04:20:53 PM
Quote from: JacobL on August 30, 2009, 04:12:44 PM
   Patriots waived QB Kevin O'Connell.
O'Connell probably won't pass through waivers unclaimed, but he's getting a dose of reality after a horrific preseason. The 94th overall pick in 2008 completed just 46% of his passes in three appearances, with a minuscule 4.1 YPA and two picks to no touchdowns. It's a breath of fresh air that New England admitted this mistake so early. Most teams would've waited for a "light" to flip on with a third-round pick. The Pats knew it wasn't happening.

Be honest here. Brady's injury scared the shit out of Patriot's management. They are scrambling to find a decent back-up who may end up starting some games. O'Connell and Walter just won't cut it.

It makes me wonder just how bad Brady's shoulder got hurt.

Information minister Tim Goebbels will tell you everything is fine. The Patriots will win every Superbowl for a thousand years.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 30, 2009, 04:28:58 PM
The Bengals signed their first-round bust.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on August 30, 2009, 04:51:27 PM
Quote from: Strix on August 30, 2009, 04:20:53 PM
Quote from: JacobL on August 30, 2009, 04:12:44 PM
   Patriots waived QB Kevin O'Connell.
O'Connell probably won't pass through waivers unclaimed, but he's getting a dose of reality after a horrific preseason. The 94th overall pick in 2008 completed just 46% of his passes in three appearances, with a minuscule 4.1 YPA and two picks to no touchdowns. It's a breath of fresh air that New England admitted this mistake so early. Most teams would've waited for a "light" to flip on with a third-round pick. The Pats knew it wasn't happening.

Be honest here. Brady's injury scared the shit out of Patriot's management. They are scrambling to find a decent back-up who may end up starting some games. O'Connell and Walter just won't cut it.

It makes me wonder just how bad Brady's shoulder got hurt.
Ridiculous to the point of being laughable.  :lol:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on August 30, 2009, 04:55:29 PM
Quote from: Neil on August 30, 2009, 04:28:58 PM
The Bengals signed their first-round bust.

All the Skyline and Gold Star Chili franchises breathe a sigh of relief as that tubbo's attention turns from eating to playing poorly for the bengals.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 30, 2009, 05:24:27 PM
Quote from: Ed Anger on August 30, 2009, 04:55:29 PM
Quote from: Neil on August 30, 2009, 04:28:58 PM
The Bengals signed their first-round bust.

All the Skyline and Gold Star Chili franchises breathe a sigh of relief as that tubbo's attention turns from eating to playing poorly for the bengals.
Let's be fair.  A guy who holds out that long obviously isn't all that concerned about playing.  You'll only have to worry about him for two seasons tops.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: PDH on August 30, 2009, 06:22:26 PM
Quote from: Kleves on August 30, 2009, 03:55:08 PM
Root for UW. They have nowhere to go but up.  :)
Yeah!!!!

Oh wait, you mean the OTHER UW...
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Alcibiades on August 30, 2009, 07:43:51 PM
Speaking of family, your niece is at Ohio state now, right monkeybutt?  Might have to tailgate last weekend of September out there. :perv:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 30, 2009, 07:54:21 PM
Quote from: Alcibiades on August 30, 2009, 07:43:51 PM
Speaking of family, your niece is at Ohio state now, right monkeybutt?  Might have to tailgate last weekend of September out there. :perv:
Goddaughter.  You'll be tapping his goddaughter.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Alcibiades on August 30, 2009, 08:16:58 PM
In which NSFW topic should I post the pictures in the backroom?   :elvis:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 30, 2009, 08:31:02 PM
Quote from: Alcibiades on August 30, 2009, 08:16:58 PM
In which NSFW topic should I post the pictures in the backroom?   :elvis:
Well, you are a member, so member pics would probably be alright.  Still, it is significant enough that you could probably start a new thread.

If possible, avoid posting photographs of your penis.  Thank you.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Vince on August 30, 2009, 09:09:11 PM
Quote from: Judas Iscariot on August 26, 2009, 06:56:19 PM
Vince, we should organize a Utica Languish meetup for October 25th to watch the Raiders and Jets game.  Got a preferred sports bar in the area?

No preference on a place I haven't been to a sports bar for football since I moved back from Syracuse.  Just let me know
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on August 31, 2009, 09:44:27 AM
Ah...the Monday night beatdown of the Texans begins in only a few short hours.  Of course, quite a few of the mook Houston fans have already gone into total panic mode and are beginning to squeal about firing Kubiak and the brand new DC after two preseason games, so I guess it doesn't really matter how bad it gets. 

Hey maybe they'll win (it's not good enough fire Kubiak it's only a preseason game he sucks).

Edit: Syt:  Penn State.   Fairly close to Pittsburgh, more TV time than Pitt.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on August 31, 2009, 02:37:24 PM
Favre has a cracked rib!

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/trainingcamp09/news/story?id=4434939

Also, Bruschi retired.

Farewell old friend.  :cry: :cheers:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: alfred russel on August 31, 2009, 03:01:05 PM
Quote from: Vince on August 30, 2009, 09:09:11 PM
Quote from: Judas Iscariot on August 26, 2009, 06:56:19 PM
Vince, we should organize a Utica Languish meetup for October 25th to watch the Raiders and Jets game.  Got a preferred sports bar in the area?

No preference on a place I haven't been to a sports bar for football since I moved back from Syracuse.  Just let me know


Are you from Syracuse? Have you eaten at Dinosaur's? I love that place, and it's not a bad place to catch a game.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 31, 2009, 03:05:43 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on August 31, 2009, 02:37:24 PM
Favre has a cracked rib!

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/trainingcamp09/news/story?id=4434939

Also, Bruschi retired.
A prima donna laid low, a cheater calls it quits.

A good day.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadImmortalMan on August 31, 2009, 04:05:09 PM
Quote
Favre, who signed a $25 million deal with the Vikings on Aug. 18, completed just one pass for four yards over two series in his Minnesota debut just days later.

That's an ROI of $6,250,000/yd.


I wonder what Hershel Walker is up to these days anyway.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Valmy on August 31, 2009, 04:06:58 PM
Favre is still going to play so there is nothing all that exciting to this story.  He will just hurt a bit more when he throws those interceptions.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Berkut on August 31, 2009, 04:07:22 PM
Tedy Bruschi is going to retire.

Sad because the greatest Arizona Wildcat ever is done playing football.

Good because I can go back to hating the Pats.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Valmy on August 31, 2009, 04:07:26 PM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on August 31, 2009, 04:05:09 PM
That's an ROI of $6,250,000/yd.

Pre-season yards do not count.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on August 31, 2009, 04:10:50 PM
Quote from: Neil on August 31, 2009, 03:05:43 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on August 31, 2009, 02:37:24 PM
Favre has a cracked rib!

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/trainingcamp09/news/story?id=4434939

Also, Bruschi retired.
a cheater calls it quits.


:yeahright:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on August 31, 2009, 04:34:27 PM
Quote from: Berkut on August 31, 2009, 04:07:22 PM
Tedy Bruschi is going to retire.

Sad because the greatest Arizona Wildcat ever is done playing football.

Good because I can go back to hating the Pats.

When a player I like go to the pats, I enact the damnatio memoriae.

Vrabel? Erased
Galloway? Gone from memory
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 31, 2009, 04:59:49 PM
Quote from: Berkut on August 31, 2009, 04:07:22 PM
Tedy Bruschi is going to retire.

Sad because the greatest Arizona Wildcat ever is done playing football.

Good because I can go back to hating the Pats.
McAlister has a legitimate Super Bowl ring.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Alcibiades on August 31, 2009, 05:02:50 PM
Why did the ravens release mcalister exactly?  :unsure:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on August 31, 2009, 05:10:06 PM
Quote from: Alcibiades on August 31, 2009, 05:02:50 PM
Why did the ravens release mcalister exactly?  :unsure:
He was getting injured and pulling down big time money.  It's hard to pay a guy $11 million a season when he's missed most of the last two seasons (especially a 10-year vet at a position as youth-oriented as cornerback), and the Ravens needed cap space.

They don't have any corner that is as good as McAlister right now, but they have several guys who are fairly good.  McAlister still isn't rehabed from his injury, but provided his knee can hold up, he'll be playing somewhere, although not for $11 million.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Alcibiades on August 31, 2009, 05:12:14 PM
Too bad..
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on August 31, 2009, 05:41:06 PM
Hey...Travis "Fuck Trent Green" Johnson has been traded to the Chargers.   :( 
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on August 31, 2009, 08:47:49 PM
Eh.  Aside from the dumbass moment on the first play of the game (the Vikes actually ran right where Travis Johnson's fatass used to be heh) and the occasional inability to tackle, the defense looked better than I thought it would with the FNG's out in the secondary (no Berrian though), and Cushing still not playing, etc.  They at least showed up for the most part, so that helps.

Schaub seems to just have a sprained ankle when it looked like he slipped a little running out of bounds.  Doesn't look like a big deal.  I'm actually more concerned about the fullback, #44.   Nevermind...he's playing.  :)
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Alcibiades on August 31, 2009, 08:50:00 PM
Peterson looked good on the first play of the game...otherwise you guys didn't manage to kill Favre as I had hoped.  Put him on his back a few times though. :)
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on August 31, 2009, 08:51:45 PM
Quote from: Alcibiades on August 31, 2009, 08:50:00 PM
Peterson looked good on the first play of the game...otherwise you guys didn't manage to kill Favre as I had hoped.  Put him on his back a few times though. :)

Yeah, I think I counted 5, maybe 6 knockdowns, plus the two sacks (and including the silly roughing call), but none of them were as hard as I would have liked.  No more broken ribs, I don't think.

Hey look at DanO heaving the ball around.  Edit:  And still looking like a backup.  :P

Fuck Brett Favre.  I want blood.  They need Travis Johnson right now.  Resign him just long enough to step on Favre's throat and laugh about it.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: derspiess on August 31, 2009, 10:14:39 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on August 31, 2009, 02:37:24 PM
Also, Bruschi retired.

Farewell old friend.  :cry: :cheers:

He always annoyed me with the way he spoke.  Did he have a speech impediment or something?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on August 31, 2009, 10:29:51 PM
Quote from: derspiess on August 31, 2009, 10:14:39 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on August 31, 2009, 02:37:24 PM
Also, Bruschi retired.

Farewell old friend.  :cry: :cheers:

He always annoyed me with the way he spoke.  Did he have a speech impediment or something?
Maybe I don't notice it because I've heard him speak so often, but I don't think he sounds weird. :unsure:

http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=4434484
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Vince on September 01, 2009, 06:23:49 AM
Quote from: alfred russel on August 31, 2009, 03:01:05 PM
Quote from: Vince on August 30, 2009, 09:09:11 PM
Quote from: Judas Iscariot on August 26, 2009, 06:56:19 PM
Vince, we should organize a Utica Languish meetup for October 25th to watch the Raiders and Jets game.  Got a preferred sports bar in the area?

No preference on a place I haven't been to a sports bar for football since I moved back from Syracuse.  Just let me know



Are you from Syracuse? Have you eaten at Dinosaur's? I love that place, and it's not a bad place to catch a game.


I lived there for 4 years until I moved back to Utica.  Yeah Dinosaur's is good eatin... :mmm:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on September 01, 2009, 11:32:24 PM
NFL live says Orton dislocated his finger pretty badly and might miss the first couple of days. :pinch:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on September 02, 2009, 08:00:35 AM
So, here's something funny.  The Bengals' first-round bust, who held out for almost the entire preseason (something that pretty much ends his chances of contributing to the team this year, and seriously reduces his prospects for long-term NFL success) has broken his foot, and will miss more time.

The NFL needs a rookie payscale.  The Bengals need a GM, and a player that has an ounce of character.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Valmy on September 02, 2009, 08:03:40 AM
Quote from: Neil on September 02, 2009, 08:00:35 AM
The Bengals need a player that has an ounce of character.

They have him, his name is Quan Cosby :punk:

http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-fantasy/09000d5d81230b30
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on September 02, 2009, 08:11:33 AM
Quote from: Valmy on September 02, 2009, 08:03:40 AM
They have him, his name is Quan Cosby :punk:

http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-fantasy/09000d5d81230b30

:punk:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on September 02, 2009, 08:15:16 AM
Quote from: Valmy on September 02, 2009, 08:03:40 AM
Quote from: Neil on September 02, 2009, 08:00:35 AM
The Bengals need a player that has an ounce of character.

They have him, his name is Quan Cosby :punk:

http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-fantasy/09000d5d81230b30
He played pro baseball.  No character in him.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Berkut on September 02, 2009, 08:46:55 AM
Quote from: Neil on August 31, 2009, 04:59:49 PM
Quote from: Berkut on August 31, 2009, 04:07:22 PM
Tedy Bruschi is going to retire.

Sad because the greatest Arizona Wildcat ever is done playing football.

Good because I can go back to hating the Pats.
McAlister has a legitimate Super Bowl ring.

McAlister was certainly a great Wildcat, but he was a juco transfer, and never had the charisma or connection with the school that Bruschi has had,and hopefully will continue to have.

He did utterly dominate the game though. Two years of opposing QBs simple not throwing to his side of the field.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: derspiess on September 02, 2009, 09:19:05 AM
Quote from: Neil on September 02, 2009, 08:00:35 AM
and a player that has an ounce of character.
:yeahright:

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.athlonsports.com%2Fd%2F7697-1%2FCarsonPalmer.jpg&hash=170a0e5d475671932d47aebf004a961fc69942b6)
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on September 02, 2009, 09:56:06 AM
Quote from: derspiess on September 02, 2009, 09:19:05 AM
Quote from: Neil on September 02, 2009, 08:00:35 AM
and a player that has an ounce of character.
:yeahright:

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.athlonsports.com%2Fd%2F7697-1%2FCarsonPalmer.jpg&hash=170a0e5d475671932d47aebf004a961fc69942b6)
Well, I can't knock Carson on his character.  Only his durability.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: derspiess on September 02, 2009, 10:10:31 AM
Quote from: Neil on September 02, 2009, 09:56:06 AM
Well, I can't knock Carson on his character.  Only his durability.

I wouldn't call his durability any worse than the average starting QB.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on September 03, 2009, 06:00:59 AM
Quote from: Alcibiades on August 31, 2009, 05:02:50 PM
Why did the ravens release mcalister exactly?  :unsure:

Because everybody got tired of him biting on the same Marvin Harrison stutter step.  I mean, jeez, even my grandmother could've adjusted for coverage after a few years of getting beaten on the same play.

Also, too much money, and he pissed Harbaugh off.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on September 03, 2009, 06:03:11 AM
Quote from: derspiess on August 31, 2009, 10:14:39 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on August 31, 2009, 02:37:24 PM
Also, Bruschi retired.

Farewell old friend.  :cry: :cheers:

He always annoyed me with the way he spoke.  Did he have a speech impediment or something?

Stroke victims usually do.

Fuck Bruschi.  Dickhead.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: derspiess on September 03, 2009, 08:45:48 PM
WTF is up with the Snickers NFL sponsorship.  When I saw it in Madden 10 I thought it was only in the game.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: HisMajestyBOB on September 03, 2009, 09:01:43 PM
Quote from: derspiess on September 03, 2009, 08:45:48 PM
WTF is up with the Snickers NFL sponsorship.  When I saw it in Madden 10 I thought it was only in the game.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gqbNQ1D6IUk
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Valmy on September 03, 2009, 09:03:59 PM
Quote from: HisMajestyBOB on September 03, 2009, 09:01:43 PM
Quote from: derspiess on September 03, 2009, 08:45:48 PM
WTF is up with the Snickers NFL sponsorship.  When I saw it in Madden 10 I thought it was only in the game.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gqbNQ1D6IUk

Oh my god I loved that commercial when it first came out...that was 1997 or so I think.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: derspiess on September 03, 2009, 09:11:36 PM
From the scoreboard:
GET DRAFTED BY THE CINCINNUTTI BENGALS....   BE A CHOMPIAN...   SUIT UP WITH THE CINCINNUTTI BENGALS

:bleeding:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: HisMajestyBOB on September 03, 2009, 09:18:17 PM
 :lmfao:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on September 04, 2009, 12:03:14 PM
The Bills just fired their offensive coordinator.

WTF? That's the third one this week isn't it? The season hasn't even started yet.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: callmeclemens on September 04, 2009, 12:06:12 PM
Can the jets pleae stop romancing me with 3rd string quarterbacks int the pre season, first Ratliff and now Ainge.

Ratliff Pre Season 2008
32-47  499 yds  4td 1 int

Ainge
28-49   435 yds   4tds  oint
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on September 04, 2009, 04:39:44 PM
Quote from: callmeclemens on September 04, 2009, 12:06:12 PM
Can the jets pleae stop romancing me with 3rd string quarterbacks int the pre season, first Ratliff and now Ainge.

Ratliff Pre Season 2008
32-47  499 yds  4td 1 int

Ainge
28-49   435 yds   4tds  oint
Remember that 3rd string quarterbacks play 3rd string defences.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Barrister on September 04, 2009, 05:13:06 PM
I'm surprised that the fact that Adam "Pacman" Jones came *this close* to signing with the Winnipeg Blue Bombers didn't get any comment in this thread.  :lol:

QuotePacman video gets bad Blue review
Players relieved they won't have 'cancer' in room
By: Ed Tait

4/09/2009 1:00 AM | Comments: 5
Print E–mail Report Error It's hardly compelling, but it's entertaining in a bizarre, train-wreck sort of way.

The video of Adam (Pacman) Jones' online chat with his fans Tuesday night, which ultimately spiked his chances of playing in the CFL, has dominated the discussion in the Winnipeg Blue Bombers' clubhouse in the last couple of days. And the consensus is pretty clear: This tightly knit crew -- which said collectively they would welcome Jones with open arms when news of his possible foray north first broke -- is now positively thrilled the organization pulled the plug on Pacman wearing the Blue and Gold.

"I checked it out and I was just shaking my head the whole time I was watching it," Bomber running back Fred Reid said. "It's uncalled for, and to have it on live TV... it's inappropriate. I can understand where the coaches came from and their decision not to sign him after all. We don't need that attitude in this locker-room right now. He's talking like he's bigger than everything."

In case you missed it -- and if you did, save yourself the 44 minutes you'll never get back -- Jones' video features him first indicating he had signed in the fledgling UFL before correcting himself. But it also includes him boasting about scoring a couple TDs a game and exiting as soon as an NFL team called because he had an "out" in his contract (which doesn't exist).

Most of all, he comes across as cocky and still full of bravado -- exactly the kind of attitude that could have drawn all the wrong kinds of attention for a team that has had its challenges through a 3-5 start, but is still in position to make a run at the post-season.

"I haven't seen it yet, but I'm going to go home and watch it right away," said centre Obby Khan. "I heard it's priceless. It sounds like, essentially, that video got him cut. Congratulations to Pacman for that.

"Thing is, we govern ourselves in here. We do a great job in here, more so than in the six years I've been in the league. The guys are great. There's great camaraderie, great teamwork, and everyone's friends in here. So if we were to invite a cancer in, it would be quickly expelled from the locker-room, from the body. I wasn't worried about that. Even if he did come and he was a cancer, we would have handled it."

Asked if he had watched the now-notorious video, Bomber head coach Mike Kelly said: "My eyes were burning. It's unfortunate that type of behaviour can be broadcast all around the world. It just wasn't something I thought was conducive to our football club."

Veteran linebacker Ike Charlton, a guy with NFL experience, just shook his head in disbelief when asked if he had watched Jones and his antics.

"It's a guy that doesn't understand the magnitude of the situation," he said. "It's a guy that doesn't understand what's at stake. It's a guy that doesn't care. It's a case where you had another opportunity to get another chance to play and do something you love, but you continue to draw red flags and put yourself in predicaments you can't get out of.

"He just don't understand the talent level up here. It was a dumb move by him. I can guarantee he don't have a clue about the CFL game. For him to come in here and say this is going to happen, that is going to happen... you can tell right there he don't understand how the game is played here."

http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/sports/football/bombers/pacman-video-gets-bad-blue-review-57212997.html
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on September 04, 2009, 05:21:47 PM
Quote from: HisMajestyBOB on September 03, 2009, 09:01:43 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gqbNQ1D6IUk

This was in the related videos:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CmSCh5ZkMqk&NR=1

:D
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on September 04, 2009, 05:25:16 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on September 04, 2009, 12:03:14 PM
The Bills just fired their offensive coordinator.

WTF? That's the third one this week isn't it? The season hasn't even started yet.

It can't touch the sheer, palpable tension surrounding the secret Cleveland starter QB.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: sbr on September 04, 2009, 05:30:18 PM
Quote from: HisMajestyBOB on September 03, 2009, 09:01:43 PM
Quote from: derspiess on September 03, 2009, 08:45:48 PM
WTF is up with the Snickers NFL sponsorship.  When I saw it in Madden 10 I thought it was only in the game.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gqbNQ1D6IUk

Loved that when it came out.  :lol:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: sbr on September 04, 2009, 05:31:18 PM
Quote from: Barrister on September 04, 2009, 05:13:06 PM

http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/sports/football/bombers/pacman-video-gets-bad-blue-review-57212997.html

Got a link to the video?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Barrister on September 04, 2009, 05:33:47 PM
I don't, but surely it must be on youtube (which I can't access from work).
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Vince on September 04, 2009, 05:42:34 PM
Quote from: callmeclemens on September 04, 2009, 12:06:12 PM
Can the jets pleae stop romancing me with 3rd string quarterbacks int the pre season, first Ratliff and now Ainge.

Ratliff Pre Season 2008
32-47  499 yds  4td 1 int

Ainge
28-49   435 yds   4tds  oint

Well the way Clemens played last night Ainge might be the backup.  Of course the way the Jets go through QBs Ainge could be starting at some point this season.   ;)
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on September 04, 2009, 06:37:12 PM
The NFL Network's love affair with the Jets is a little ridiculous.  The hardon for Sanchez is one thing, but Vernon 'Bust' Gholston?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on September 04, 2009, 08:01:21 PM
Quote from: Neil on September 04, 2009, 06:37:12 PM
The NFL Network's love affair with the Jets is a little ridiculous.  The hardon for Sanchez is one thing, but Vernon 'Bust' Gholston?

What do you have against the Ghost Buster?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on September 04, 2009, 08:32:52 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on September 04, 2009, 08:01:21 PM
Quote from: Neil on September 04, 2009, 06:37:12 PM
The NFL Network's love affair with the Jets is a little ridiculous.  The hardon for Sanchez is one thing, but Vernon 'Bust' Gholston?

What do you have against the Ghost Buster?
He sucks.

Also, why would anyone call him that?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on September 04, 2009, 08:35:45 PM
Quote from: Neil on September 04, 2009, 08:32:52 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on September 04, 2009, 08:01:21 PM
Quote from: Neil on September 04, 2009, 06:37:12 PM
The NFL Network's love affair with the Jets is a little ridiculous.  The hardon for Sanchez is one thing, but Vernon 'Bust' Gholston?

What do you have against the Ghost Buster?
He sucks.

Also, why would anyone call him that?
I just came up with it when I saw your post.

Also, I'm a bit drunk. -_-
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on September 05, 2009, 07:01:30 PM
Well Oakland cut Garcia.  It looks like they've written the season off.

Somebody's going to get a top-shelf backup.  Actually, it should be the Ravens.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: dps on September 05, 2009, 07:07:56 PM
Quote from: Neil on September 05, 2009, 07:01:30 PM
Well Oakland cut Garcia.  It looks like they've written the season off.

Not necessarily, it could just mean that Al Davis hasn't regained the eye for talent that he used to have but lost sometime around the first time Art Shell was his head coach.  Or regained his sanity, either.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Sophie Scholl on September 06, 2009, 12:02:12 AM
Pfft, Al Davis will come to your house and give you an overhead presentation on Jamarcus Russell is God.  He's old, spare him the travel and just accept it.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Barrister on September 06, 2009, 12:09:05 AM
Quote from: Neil on September 05, 2009, 07:01:30 PM
Well Oakland cut Garcia.

What???
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on September 06, 2009, 12:50:18 AM
Quote from: Neil on September 05, 2009, 07:01:30 PM
Well Oakland cut Garcia. 

fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff

Anyone want to trade for a backup QB?  :frusty:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on September 06, 2009, 08:08:45 AM
The Ravens cut 5 wide receivers, and keep only 4.  W.T.F.

On the team: Derrick Mason, Mark Clayton, Kelley Washington, and Demetrius Williams.
Cut:  Justin Harper, Yamon Figurs, Jayson Foster, Ernie Wheelwright and Eron Riley.

Disappointed that Riley got cut.  He played his balls off in the Atlanta preseason game.

They're also fucking around with the DBs.  Traded Derrick Martin to the Packers for OL Moll.

This preseason, Martin was experimenting at both the cornerback and safety spots, and he said the Packers have expressed interest in him at safety.

The Ravens also released offensive tackles Joe Reitz and Stefan Rodgers, guards Tre' Stallings and Bryan Mattison, tight ends Isaac Smolko and Davon Drew (a fifth-round pick in April), cornerback Evan Oglesby, rookie running back Cedric Peerman (a sixth rounder in April), rookie linebacker William VanDeSteeg, rookie fullback Jason Cook, rookie center Robby Felix, rookie safety K.J. Gerard and defensive tackle Nadir Abdallah.

Mattison is the son of defensive coordinator Greg Mattison.

They trade Martin and cut Oglesby, yet keep that penalty flag magnet Frank Walker, who can't cover a wall with paint.  Oh well.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: PDH on September 06, 2009, 08:32:24 AM
They cut Martin because he was a Wyoming Cowboy.   :mad:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on September 06, 2009, 09:50:11 AM
WOW.

NE trades Richard Seymour to Oakland for 2011 1st rd pick.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on September 06, 2009, 09:56:35 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on September 06, 2009, 09:50:11 AM
WOW.

NE trades Richard Seymour to Oakland for 2011 1st rd pick.
2011?  Really?  That's thinking ahead.

And Oakland is priming itself for complete failure this year.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Strix on September 06, 2009, 10:15:40 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on September 06, 2009, 09:50:11 AM
WOW.

NE trades Richard Seymour to Oakland for 2011 1st rd pick.

Brady's injury must be that bad if they are starting to rebuild before the season even begins.  ;)
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on September 06, 2009, 10:19:56 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on September 06, 2009, 09:50:11 AM
WOW.

NE trades Richard Seymour to Oakland for 2011 1st rd pick.
:bleeding:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on September 06, 2009, 10:31:50 AM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on September 06, 2009, 10:19:56 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on September 06, 2009, 09:50:11 AM
WOW.

NE trades Richard Seymour to Oakland for 2011 1st rd pick.
:bleeding:

:nelson
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: sbr on September 06, 2009, 10:35:45 AM
That was rather unexpected.  I have to give the Patriots the benefit of the doubt on it though, thye are pretty good at shipping guys out of town right as they hit the downhill side of their careers.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on September 06, 2009, 11:02:08 AM
Quote from: sbr on September 06, 2009, 10:35:45 AM
That was rather unexpected.  I have to give the Patriots the benefit of the doubt on it though, thye are pretty good at shipping guys out of town right as they hit the downhill side of their careers.
Are you soft of Patriotardism?

We should set up a Commission of Inquiry to root out these snakes in our ranks.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Barrister on September 06, 2009, 11:09:49 AM
Yeah, I can see that move actually.  The guy is almost 30, has had some injuries, and 1st round pics are always useful.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: PDH on September 06, 2009, 11:12:34 AM
Quote from: Barrister on September 06, 2009, 11:09:49 AM
Yeah, I can see that move actually.  The guy is almost 30, has had some injuries, and 1st round pics are always useful.
30, eh?  A bit young for Al Davis, but in a few years he will mature.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Vince on September 06, 2009, 11:14:40 AM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on September 06, 2009, 10:19:56 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on September 06, 2009, 09:50:11 AM
WOW.

NE trades Richard Seymour to Oakland for 2011 1st rd pick.
:bleeding:

Why are you upset that's going to be a top 5 pick? 
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: sbr on September 06, 2009, 11:19:44 AM
Quote from: Neil on September 06, 2009, 11:02:08 AM
Quote from: sbr on September 06, 2009, 10:35:45 AM
That was rather unexpected.  I have to give the Patriots the benefit of the doubt on it though, thye are pretty good at shipping guys out of town right as they hit the downhill side of their careers.
Are you soft of Patriotardism?

We should set up a Commission of Inquiry to root out these snakes in our ranks.

I am not a Patriots fan but I don't always hate a team/coach/QB/player because they are significantly better than mine.  I also seem to end up with Brady on my Fantasy Football team more often than not. :mancrush:

I also think the "THEY R CHEETERZZ!!"group are similar to the "death panel" people in the US health care debate: either deliberately spreading false information or painfully ignorant.  I have heard many people who know what they are talking about --ex-coaches and players-- say that filming a team's pre-game walk-through will not do much of anything to help, if that even happened.  I am also pretty sure that every team "accidentally" caught plays being signaled in from the sidelines, the Pat's are just the ones to be caught.

Thirdly I cannot think of one player who has become better after leaving the Bellichek/Brady Patriots.  I can only think of one, the CB Assanti Samuel, who played at a similar level after leaving.

:)
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on September 06, 2009, 12:09:51 PM
Condemned from his own mouth!

I hearby sentence you to be hanged by the neck until dead.  However, at the request of your government, your sentence is commuted to Timmification.

I'm also accepting applications to head a Commission of Inquiry to look into the possibility that we have been infiltrated by organized Patriotards whose loyalty lies not with goodness, decency or Languish, but with Boston and its associated web of evil.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on September 06, 2009, 01:11:57 PM
Quote from: Neil on September 06, 2009, 12:09:51 PM
Condemned from his own mouth!

I hearby sentence you to be hanged by the neck until dead.  However, at the request of your government, your sentence is commuted to Timmification.

I'm also accepting applications to head a Commission of Inquiry to look into the possibility that we have been infiltrated by organized Patriotards whose loyalty lies not with goodness, decency or Languish, but with Boston and its associated web of evil.

The Ordos Bandwagonicus wishes to talk to sbr.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on September 06, 2009, 01:55:22 PM
Merriman arested for battery.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/09/06/shawne-merriman-busted-for-battery-false-imprisonment/
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on September 06, 2009, 01:56:22 PM
QuoteThis year, the question is whether Merriman will be able to play after allegedly assaulting a D-level television celebrity named Tila Tequila.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

TILA TEQUILA?  :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Liep on September 06, 2009, 02:32:54 PM
The real criminals here are the D-level celebrities. :angry:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on September 06, 2009, 05:15:56 PM
Quote from: Ed Anger on September 06, 2009, 01:56:22 PM
QuoteThis year, the question is whether Merriman will be able to play after allegedly assaulting a D-level television celebrity named Tila Tequila.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

TILA TEQUILA?  :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Wasn't that the girl juicing the Olympic swimming kid for all his cash?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on September 06, 2009, 08:05:15 PM
Quote from: Ed Anger on September 06, 2009, 01:56:22 PM
QuoteThis year, the question is whether Merriman will be able to play after allegedly assaulting a D-level television celebrity named Tila Tequila.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

TILA TEQUILA?  :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.datzhott.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2009%2F06%2Ftila_t.jpg&hash=3e0ead326d3a690665ac021ce0c8803c726cfa35)
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on September 07, 2009, 08:29:20 AM
I'd expect a man with his money to have better taste.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on September 07, 2009, 09:13:28 AM
Quote from: Ed Anger on September 07, 2009, 08:29:20 AM
I'd expect a man with his money to have better taste.

Well, in all honesty, since he was busted for roids, he's been a D-level player.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on September 07, 2009, 09:28:44 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on September 07, 2009, 09:13:28 AM
Quote from: Ed Anger on September 07, 2009, 08:29:20 AM
I'd expect a man with his money to have better taste.

Well, in all honesty, since he was busted for roids, he's been a D-level player.
The best part of all this is Charger fans.  For years, they've been crowing like they have the smartest front office in the league, because they got Merriman and Rivers for Manning.  Merriman has, between his injuries, his inability to play without the juice, and now his probably suspension, taken himself out of that conversation.  Now, the trade was for Phillip Rivers, who has been a good QB so long as the other team puts 9 in the box to stop the Chargers' running game, for Eli Manning, who is a somewhat above average QB that for one night was the greatest QB in the history of the NFL.  I don't recall Rivers ever taking his team on his back to make an unbelievable drive that drove a stake through the heart of the most evil team in the history of professional sports.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Strix on September 07, 2009, 09:49:04 AM
Quote from: Neil on September 07, 2009, 09:28:44 AM
The best part of all this is Charger fans.  For years, they've been crowing like they have the smartest front office in the league, because they got Merriman and Rivers for Manning.  Merriman has, between his injuries, his inability to play without the juice, and now his probably suspension, taken himself out of that conversation.  Now, the trade was for Phillip Rivers, who has been a good QB so long as the other team puts 9 in the box to stop the Chargers' running game, for Eli Manning, who is a somewhat above average QB that for one night was the greatest QB in the history of the NFL.  I don't recall Rivers ever taking his team on his back to make an unbelievable drive that drove a stake through the heart of the most evil team in the history of professional sports.

I'd say the trade was even at best (leaning towards the Chargers side). And I am not sure I'd say that Manning was "the greatest QB in the history of the NFL" for one night. The last drive was exciting and memorable but the Giants only scored 17 points. And the last drive to win the game was the result of an amazing catch by Tyree.

Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on September 07, 2009, 09:54:52 AM
Quote from: Strix on September 07, 2009, 09:49:04 AM
Quote from: Neil on September 07, 2009, 09:28:44 AM
The best part of all this is Charger fans.  For years, they've been crowing like they have the smartest front office in the league, because they got Merriman and Rivers for Manning.  Merriman has, between his injuries, his inability to play without the juice, and now his probably suspension, taken himself out of that conversation.  Now, the trade was for Phillip Rivers, who has been a good QB so long as the other team puts 9 in the box to stop the Chargers' running game, for Eli Manning, who is a somewhat above average QB that for one night was the greatest QB in the history of the NFL.  I don't recall Rivers ever taking his team on his back to make an unbelievable drive that drove a stake through the heart of the most evil team in the history of professional sports.

I'd say the trade was even at best (leaning towards the Chargers side). And I am not sure I'd say that Manning was "the greatest QB in the history of the NFL" for one night. The last drive was exciting and memorable but the Giants only scored 17 points. And the last drive to win the game was the result of an amazing catch by Tyree.
Manning deserves a lot of credit for getting that throw off though.  Tyree made a showtime catch, but to me the most impressive part of that play was Manning avoiding the sack.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Barrister on September 07, 2009, 10:51:58 AM
I dunno, I think I would say that Rivers is a better QB than Manning, straight up, so I suppose that was a good trade.

But of course if any Charger fan tries to use that as proof of how smart their front office is, it's also clear that Brees is a better QB than either of them.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on September 07, 2009, 05:19:31 PM
Hey CdM.  Guess which former Raven nicknamed Zeus got arrested for burglary?

Also, do you think the Ravens are going to sign Neal?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on September 07, 2009, 05:21:38 PM
Quote from: Neil on September 07, 2009, 05:19:31 PM
Hey CdM.  Guess which former Raven nicknamed Zeus got arrested for burglary?

Yeah.  Apparently he broke into his ex's house that was for sale, and took a dump in the toilet right before it was to be shown by the  realtor.  Too funny.  God Bless that crazy blind fuck.

QuoteAlso, do you think the Ravens are going to sign Neal?

Yes, but not until after Week 1.  Unless the Jest get to him first.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Strix on September 08, 2009, 09:00:05 AM
Quote from: CBSSportslineGiants suspect spy motives as QB Woodson goes to 'Skins

EAST RUTHERFORD, N.J. -- There's nothing like adding a little intrigue, secrecy and skullduggery to a season-opening contest between two longtime NFC East rivals, the New York Giants and Washington Redskins.
   
The Redskins' signing of former Giants quarterback Andre' Woodson to their practice squad on Sunday has New York coach Tom Coughlin and players thinking the move is as sinister as a twist in a Tom Clancy novel. Or some plot hatched by the Skins' northern Virginia neighbor, the CIA.

Woodson spent all of last season on the Giants' practice squad and was among New York's final cuts this weekend. He knows all the plays and, even worse, all the audible calls.

Coughlin was blunt in saying it was obvious why Woodson was signed.

"I have been a part of it," Coughlin said Monday when asked whether he has ever signed a player released by a team he was about to play. "I have seen it done. A guy doesn't get in the door two seconds, and he is in a classroom being grilled."

The cloak and dagger decision will force the Giants to change some audible calls for Eli Manning, Coughlin said.

Redskins coach Jim Zorn insisted Woodson wasn't signed just for this week.

""Oh, yeah. Yeah," Zorn said. "And that's something that I would be frustrated with, too, and I do understand that, that it makes it look like we're jumping on that, but that wasn't the major issue with the find."

Zorn said the Redskins scouted Woodson coming out of college and decided to take a chance on him after New York let him go.

"He might be able to help us a little bit," Zorn said. "He knows their stuff. He certainly knew their snap count and just the obvious things, but we're not trying to glean every little [detail], we're not going to put him under the microscope."

Giants backup quarterback David Carr smiled when asked about the signing, and acknowledged he sent a text message Woodson early Monday.

"Don't give out our secrets, Wood," Carr said. "That's what I told him. I haven't got a message back. I'm sure he is in meetings. I'm sure I'll hit him up this afternoon."

Carr then quipped he told Woodson that he didn't know any of the Giants' plays, anyway.

"We'll see how Woody handles it," Carr said. "I'm sure he'll handle it the right way. We'll find out early on if they know what is going on. I'm sure we'll have a plan. We're not going in there without having an answer for them knowing any of our checks, because we do do a lot of that stuff."

Standing in front of a locker that did not have his nameplate on Monday, Woodson said that he didn't hesitate to sign with the Skins after they called.

Washington's move, however, was suspicious.

When Chase Daniel was cut on Saturday, he said he was told he would get the quarterback spot on the practice squad if he cleared waivers. Instead, the Redskins went with Woodson. Daniel was signed to the Saints' practice squad.

While disappointed and frustrated, Woodson said he had no hard feelings toward the Giants. He also said he knows the Giants' playbook and realizes who is paying him now.

"I'm definitely a little bit familiar with it," he said. "Right now, anything to help the Redskins out, I'm willing to do."

Giants offensive tackle David Diehl said the move was part of the game.

"We're going to have to change a few things verbiage-wise, like we do each and every week," Diehl said. "We play this team two times a year and every time we play them we come up with little different things, a little different terminology to keep them on edge."

Defensive end Justin Tuck was coy at first when asked he if knew what the Giants' offense was going to run in training camp after hearing Manning bark out the same audible calls day after day.

Then he got serious.

"Think about it with our offense. We know what some words mean, but we don't know when it's a live word," Tuck said. "He can say (something) and tell everyone in the huddle to disregard it when he says it."

Manning downplayed the signing. He said the Redskins don't know what plays the Giants are running and that the audible calls -- which can change a play entirely or the direction it is being run -- might be hard to decipher.

"I don't know if they will be able to hear everything we're doing, and we're at home, so I'm not real concerned about it," Manning said.

The mystery will play out Sunday.

Coughlin is so full of shit. He did this every year when the Jags played the Steelers back in the day (probably twice a year).
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Savonarola on September 08, 2009, 12:57:22 PM
And it's desperation marketing time in Detroit:

QuoteWe are excited to introduce to you our ALL NEW
"All You Can Eat" Seat!

Come enjoy Detroit Lions football with all the Eckrich hot dogs, bratwursts, nachos and cheese, chips, popcorn and soft drinks you can tackle!

The seats are $15 more than the non "All you can eat" seats.  It's a good ploy, now the Lion's fan won't know if it is indgestion or the Lion's performance that makes him feel sick to your stomach.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on September 08, 2009, 01:16:58 PM
So a team picked up a player from a division rival, with the intention of getting the inside scoop?  Stop the presses.  Someone alert Tim Ortiz so he can tell the world.  This is certainly something that has never happened at least a two dozen times every season.  It is not, I repeat, not routine.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: crazy canuck on September 08, 2009, 01:47:11 PM
I have to say that watching my son learn fundamentals of football gives me a whole new appreciation for the sport and the athleticism needed to play it.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Strix on September 08, 2009, 04:39:36 PM
Quote from: crazy canuck on September 08, 2009, 01:47:11 PM
I have to say that watching my son learn fundamentals of football gives me a whole new appreciation for the sport and the athleticism needed to play it.

To be honest, athleticism is the easiest part of the game. It really isn't that hard to find people athletic enough to play it. Intelligence and determination is what separates good players from bad players. The determination to practice, practice, and practice some more along with the various "optional" conditioning isn't something every player is prepared to do. And if you are able to find a person with both the athleticism and the determination required than you have to find someone with the intelligence to along with it. What good is running a 4.40 if you can't run a proper route or understand how the audible just called changes the play?

I suppose, if you are big enough than you don't need any of the three and can be a tackle or nose guard but beyond that you better possess some degree of athleticism, determination, or intelligence otherwise you'll be the guy looking like a jack ass during film review after the game.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on September 08, 2009, 06:03:48 PM
QuoteThe Ravens worked out free-agent wide receiver David Tyree on Tuesday, general manager Ozzie Newsome confirmed to the team's Web site.

Tyree, 29, is taking a physical, which could be the final step to the Ravens signing him. This marks the Ravens' first attempt to upgrade their wide receiver group since the final major cutdown last weekend.

Tyree was cut by the New York Giants just two years after being one of their Super Bowl stars. The 6-foot, 206-pound receiver is best known for making the "helmet catch" on the Giants' game-winning drive to beat the New England Patriots in February 2008.

Last season, Tyree was placed on injured reserve for a knee injury suffered during training camp. A sixth-round pick in 2003, he has 54 receptions in 73 career games.

The Ravens currently have four receivers on their roster: Derrick Mason, Mark Clayton, Demetrius Williams and Kelley Washington.

When asked Monday whether the Ravens were in talks to add another wide receiver, coach John Harbaugh said, "We're always in talks to make our team better. You know that's the answer I'm going to give you. We can play with four [receivers], because with our offense, we can put any number of players out there that we want. It's a little more difficult on defense. The team puts four wide receivers out there, or five wide receivers, you've got to be able to match. On offense, we can put one wide receiver out there if we want, if we need to, and we've got some flexibility with our players and guys we can put on the field."

All things considered, I think they still should've made a play for Brandon Marshall.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on September 08, 2009, 06:34:15 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on September 08, 2009, 06:03:48 PM
All things considered, I think they still should've made a play for Brandon Marshall.
I sort of agree, but I have the feeling that Denver would have been very demanding.

Question:  Is Michael Crabtree's NFL career over?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Vince on September 08, 2009, 06:44:26 PM
Quote from: Neil on September 08, 2009, 06:34:15 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on September 08, 2009, 06:03:48 PM
All things considered, I think they still should've made a play for Brandon Marshall.
I sort of agree, but I have the feeling that Denver would have been very demanding.

Question:  Is Michael Crabtree's NFL career over?

Did it ever begin?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Admiral Yi on September 08, 2009, 06:59:21 PM
Quote from: crazy canuck on September 08, 2009, 01:47:11 PM
I have to say that watching my son learn fundamentals of football gives me a whole new appreciation for the sport and the athleticism needed to play it.
How much football have you played in your life?
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on September 08, 2009, 07:04:32 PM
Quote from: Vince on September 08, 2009, 06:44:26 PM
Quote from: Neil on September 08, 2009, 06:34:15 PM
Question:  Is Michael Crabtree's NFL career over?

Did it ever begin?
Well, he got drafted.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on September 08, 2009, 08:12:02 PM
Quote from: Neil on September 08, 2009, 07:04:32 PM
Quote from: Vince on September 08, 2009, 06:44:26 PM
Quote from: Neil on September 08, 2009, 06:34:15 PM
Question:  Is Michael Crabtree's NFL career over?

Did it ever begin?
Well, he got drafted.

Fuck it.  Pull an Elway.  Let San Fran dump him on someone else for next year's #1.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on September 08, 2009, 08:17:19 PM
Hey Neil, check this out.

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.baltimoresun.com%2Fmedia%2Fphoto%2F2009-09%2F49118634.jpg&hash=7e4d6d840ac5f21148d7718363d4ae53cc580b49)

QuoteRavens' feathered mascots to debut
Zoo training, caring for 2 new birds


Several weeks ago, the Ravens' equipment staff received a package in the mail containing what appeared to be a tiny pair of jockstraps. What the heck, they asked, are we supposed to do with them?

Eventually, someone got word to Gabrielle Dow, the team's vice president of marketing, who told the equipment staff that it wasn't a mistake. They were actually tiny diapers, and the team needed them to outfit two new ravens, not two new Ravens.

Birds. Not football players.

Rise and Conquer - two West African ravens - were purchased by the team recently as part of a partnership with the Maryland Zoo in Baltimore, which will oversee their training and care. The birds will be a prominent part of the team's pre-game festivities and will also make regular appearances in the community.

Although the team did have birds named Rise and Conquer who took part in pre-game festivities, those birds were owned and trained by an Atlanta couple who contracted their use for home games. They had to travel the 575 miles between the two cities for each appearance.

The team couldn't come to an agreement with the birds' owners to continue the relationship, and the original Rise died recently of disease in the ankle joint. Because the birds were so popular with fans, especially kids, the Ravens began to look into acquiring a pair of mascots who could live in Baltimore full time.

The Ravens soon found out they couldn't actually get an animal license in the state of Maryland, so they reached out to the Baltimore zoo, which agreed to form a partnership with the team. Amy Eveleth, the zoo's Embassy Collection manager, agreed to find a pair of baby ravens and train them to interact with people, because the ravens the zoo already owned were far from friendly.

So far it has worked out extremely well. The birds, who are brothers, were born April 16 in Alabama, and Eveleth began training them in Baltimore when they were around 7 weeks old. Rise and Conquer will make their public debut at a news conference today at the Baltimore zoo and attend their first Ravens game Sunday when the team opens against the Kansas City Chiefs. The birds will likely also be on display at the zoo as part of every Purple Friday, in the zoo's Basecamp Discovery exhibit.

"I think the really neat part about it is that the birds are home," Dow said. "Now the fans can see them, and kids can see them when they go to schools. That's what's so important about Amy. Now we're going to train them to be friendly, to be in the public eye, and to see fans on game day. Our fans can be near them and feel their presence."

Rise and Conquer aren't exactly cuddly. Up close, their sharp beaks are close to 3 inches long, and their talons are wiry and intimidating. They devour meatballs, a staple of their zoo diet. But they have a majestic wingspan and you can't help but feel a little bit in awe when Eveleth holds one on her arm.

"They have very different personalities, so it's very different to watch them," Eveleth said. "Rise is pretty timid and hangs back, letting Conquer go at things first. But once he figures out Conquer isn't having a problem, he jumps right in."

As a species, ravens are extremely intelligent, with the ability to recognize faces and learn repeatable behavior. Eveleth and the Embassy staff trained them to remain calm in front of 70,000 screaming fans in part by blasting music played on 98 Rock while the birds are in their cages. They also live next to parrots who squawk constantly.

One thing the birds won't do is fly inside the stadium. Although it is possible to train them to do it, it's extremely stressful to the birds.

Eveleth said she expects the ravens to be extremely popular in the community, probably on a par with the zoo's penguins, who make at least three appearances in the community per week. Fans can have their picture taken with the birds outside the stadium as a part of Ravens Walk, and yes, the birds will be suited up in full Ravens gear.

"They can't wait," Eveleth said. "They have their little outfits all ready. We put little helmets on them with shoulder pads and white pants. It's great."
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Neil on September 08, 2009, 08:40:22 PM
Nice.  Nothing beats a good animal mascot.  Just like the Dolphins had, back when they had balls.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Sophie Scholl on September 09, 2009, 02:32:05 AM
Was wondering what happened to the old Rise and Conquer when I saw that they were debuting new ones.  Now I know!  I like the fact that they're local and part of the B'more Zoo now.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: citizen k on September 09, 2009, 02:49:53 AM
Quote from: Judas Iscariot on September 09, 2009, 02:32:05 AM
Was wondering what happened to the old Rise and Conquer when I saw that they were debuting new ones.  Now I know!  I like the fact that they're local and part of the B'more Zoo now.

The Seahawk mascot will eat them for lunch.

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.spokesmanreview.com%2Fstories%2F2006%2Fjan%2F19%2Fsrx_hawk_01-19-2006_Q06J40L.jpg&hash=201453f66392e376879ebfd3d766d64a64d9de35)

Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Ed Anger on September 09, 2009, 07:01:15 AM
Quoteprobably on a par with the zoo's penguins

Careful now. Rico is nuts.

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nick.com%2Fshows%2Fpenguins-of-madagascar%2Fimages%2Fcharacters%2Frico.gif&hash=8b708d61dc5ecd5e3dc927fbaf6a5d62ea17ea35)
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Valmy on September 09, 2009, 08:10:29 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on September 08, 2009, 08:17:19 PM
Hey Neil, check this out.

Damn.  It makes me wish Daniel Snyder would get some real redskins.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: citizen k on September 09, 2009, 09:59:39 AM
Quote from: Valmy on September 09, 2009, 08:10:29 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on September 08, 2009, 08:17:19 PM
Hey Neil, check this out.

Damn.  It makes me wish Daniel Snyder would get some real redskins.

Yeah, and Tampa could hire some Somali pirates.



Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: crazy canuck on September 09, 2009, 10:54:09 AM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on September 08, 2009, 06:59:21 PM
Quote from: crazy canuck on September 08, 2009, 01:47:11 PM
I have to say that watching my son learn fundamentals of football gives me a whole new appreciation for the sport and the athleticism needed to play it.
How much football have you played in your life?

None.  This is all new to me.  I played round ball.

I have always viewed football in the way strix described above - just a bunch of large men pushing eachother around with a handful of skill positions where athleticism is required.

But what I am learning is that there is a lot of technique and skill required of all positions. 
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: derspiess on September 09, 2009, 12:01:38 PM
Quote from: Valmy on September 09, 2009, 08:10:29 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on September 08, 2009, 08:17:19 PM
Hey Neil, check this out.

Damn.  It makes me wish Daniel Snyder would get some real redskins.

What would Cleveland get?  The Brown family?  :unsure:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: charliebear on September 09, 2009, 12:08:16 PM
The Lions still suck.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Valmy on September 09, 2009, 12:13:14 PM
Quote from: derspiess on September 09, 2009, 12:01:38 PM
What would Cleveland get?  The Brown family?  :unsure:

Cincinnati is using them at the moment.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: Sophie Scholl on September 09, 2009, 02:37:53 PM
Quote from: Valmy on September 09, 2009, 12:13:14 PM
Quote from: derspiess on September 09, 2009, 12:01:38 PM
What would Cleveland get?  The Brown family?  :unsure:

Cincinnati is using them at the moment.
I bet their fans would be more than willing to ship them over.  In pieces. :lol:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: derspiess on September 09, 2009, 02:40:35 PM
Quote from: Judas Iscariot on September 09, 2009, 02:37:53 PM
Quote from: Valmy on September 09, 2009, 12:13:14 PM
Quote from: derspiess on September 09, 2009, 12:01:38 PM
What would Cleveland get?  The Brown family?  :unsure:

Cincinnati is using them at the moment.
I bet their fans would be more than willing to ship them over.  In pieces. :lol:

:ph34r:
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: jimmy olsen on September 09, 2009, 04:31:12 PM
Barry Sander's son is only 14 and already runs a 4.44 40 :o

http://highschool.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=986035
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on September 09, 2009, 05:05:47 PM
Quote from: Valmy on September 09, 2009, 08:10:29 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on September 08, 2009, 08:17:19 PM
Hey Neil, check this out.

Damn.  It makes me wish Daniel Snyder would get some real redskins.

He's too busy suing ticketholders.
For Redskins Fans, Hard Luck Runs Into Team's Hard Line (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/02/AR2009090203887.html)

QuoteOn Oct. 8, the Redskins sued Hill in Prince George's County Circuit Court for backing out of a 10-year ticket-renewal agreement after the first year. The team sought payment for every season through 2017, plus interest, attorneys' fees and court costs.
The team won a default judgment of $66,364.

Class act, that Danny.
Title: Re: NFL Offseason Thread
Post by: CountDeMoney on September 09, 2009, 05:13:10 PM
Quote from: charliebear on September 09, 2009, 12:08:16 PM
The Lions still suck.

http://www.theonion.com/content/video/nfl_players_mentor_troubled?utm_source=a-section