Languish.org

General Category => Off the Record => Topic started by: viper37 on October 25, 2015, 10:23:26 PM

Title: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: viper37 on October 25, 2015, 10:23:26 PM
Let's use this thread instead of the regular tv/movies one.

No spoiler tags here, discuss at will.  Ye be warned.



So, Glenn is gone, because of that untrustwhorthy asshole.  Rick seems fucked, how will he get out of there?  The door is on the side where the walkers are coming, unless there's a way to exit from the back and avoid the walkers there.

Should be interesting next week.  They sure learnt to keep up the suspense now.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoiler's thread
Post by: Eddie Teach on October 25, 2015, 10:32:55 PM
What was Daryl up to that he had to leave all of a sudden?

There should be doors on both sides in the front of the RV and besides, Rick is faster than the walkers. I think that scene was more a teaser scare than a real danger.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoiler's thread
Post by: viper37 on October 25, 2015, 10:36:43 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on October 25, 2015, 10:32:55 PM
What was Daryl up to that he had to leave all of a sudden?
I have no idea.  I thought he was going back to Alexandria, but then we never see him turn around and he just comes back to the car.


Quote
There should be doors on both sides in the front of the RV and besides, Rick is faster than the walkers. I think that scene was more a teaser scare than a real danger.
what happenned to his hand, he was cut or he was bitten when his blade broke?  If he was cut and there's walker's blood on his hand, what does that mean?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoiler's thread
Post by: PRC on October 25, 2015, 10:44:35 PM
I enjoyed the first season of this show.  Then the whole Governer storyline bored the shit out of me and I gave it up.  Is it worth getting back into?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoiler's thread
Post by: viper37 on October 25, 2015, 11:37:24 PM
Quote from: PRC on October 25, 2015, 10:44:35 PM
I enjoyed the first season of this show.  Then the whole Governer storyline bored the shit out of me and I gave it up.  Is it worth getting back into?
Yes.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoiler's thread
Post by: The Brain on October 26, 2015, 12:02:32 AM
SPOILERS!
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoiler's thread
Post by: Tonitrus on October 26, 2015, 12:04:38 AM
Quote from: viper37 on October 25, 2015, 10:36:43 PM
what happenned to his hand, he was cut or he was bitten when his blade broke?  If he was cut and there's walker's blood on his hand, what does that mean?

From what I saw, he was hacking at those walkers with a knife, and one of them had a machete (which he switched to to finish off that last one) stuck in its collarbone that cut his hand while he was hacking.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoiler's thread
Post by: katmai on October 26, 2015, 12:07:37 AM
Meh Glenn has been dead in comics for bit. So kinda figured not if but when.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoiler's thread
Post by: Tonitrus on October 26, 2015, 12:12:02 AM
Quote from: katmai on October 26, 2015, 12:07:37 AM
Meh Glenn has been dead in comics for bit. So kinda figured not if but when.

Meh, from I've seen, comparing TV/comics timeline, he was about due to kick off, but not as zombie food.  That just makes me wonder if they're even going to have the Negan character at all, or if someone else takes Glenn's place there (maybe Daryl, who doesn't exist in the comics at all).

The only really bad part about Glenn's death though, is that it was rather lame how it went down.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoiler's thread
Post by: Martinus on October 26, 2015, 01:50:23 AM
Quote from: The Brain on October 26, 2015, 12:02:32 AM
SPOILERS!

This. For fucks sake.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoiler's thread
Post by: viper37 on October 26, 2015, 08:14:11 AM
Quote from: Martinus on October 26, 2015, 01:50:23 AM
Quote from: The Brain on October 26, 2015, 12:02:32 AM
SPOILERS!

This. For fucks sake.
The Walking Dead spoiler's thread
The title should have given you some clues.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoiler's thread
Post by: crazy canuck on October 26, 2015, 08:21:25 AM
Darryl did turn back after he heard Rick's speech.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoiler's thread
Post by: lustindarkness on October 26, 2015, 09:48:53 AM
This is fucking bullshit. I dealt with 3 seasons worth of TWD spoilers on the TV/Movie thread. Fuck you all assholes! :mad:


Yes, I'm pissed. Either they killed Glen in a stupid way by a hated character OR he somehow rolled under the trash bin and the walkers had been tearing apart Nick just so that the show can play with my feelings and leave me hanging for two weeks (next week is a 90 minute Morgan flashback episode it seems).

Fuck y'all again. Assholes.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoiler's thread
Post by: KRonn on October 26, 2015, 10:07:52 AM
Great season so far, but I'm really bummed about Glenn's possible/likely demise. I don't know why they didn't try the fire escape stairs; it had some debris on it but they probably could have climbed over it. I'd think going up is a standard way of escaping walkers.

Rick appeared to have cut his hand on the broken knife. Those guys that attacked him in the RV were the survivors that Morgan let go. Denim guy had picked up a gun from a dead Alexandria resident after Morgan faced down him and his minions. Really bad move by Morgan to have allowed such dangerous opponents to live and escape but hopefully he'll begin to learn better.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoiler's thread
Post by: crazy canuck on October 26, 2015, 10:32:25 AM
Quote from: lustindarkness on October 26, 2015, 09:48:53 AM
This is fucking bullshit. I dealt with 3 seasons worth of TWD spoilers on the TV/Movie thread. Fuck you all assholes! :mad:


Yes, I'm pissed. Either they killed Glen in a stupid way by a hated character OR he somehow rolled under the trash bin and the walkers had been tearing apart Nick just so that the show can play with my feelings and leave me hanging for two weeks (next week is a 90 minute Morgan flashback episode it seems).

Fuck y'all again. Assholes.

I hadn't thought about that.  Maybe they are just tearing Nick apart.  Glen didnt seem to be in pain.  He really just seemed to be gathering his wits about him.  Lets hope.  Glen and Darryl are the main reasons I watch the show.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoiler's thread
Post by: Solmyr on October 26, 2015, 01:23:08 PM
Quote from: crazy canuck on October 26, 2015, 10:32:25 AM
Quote from: lustindarkness on October 26, 2015, 09:48:53 AM
This is fucking bullshit. I dealt with 3 seasons worth of TWD spoilers on the TV/Movie thread. Fuck you all assholes! :mad:


Yes, I'm pissed. Either they killed Glen in a stupid way by a hated character OR he somehow rolled under the trash bin and the walkers had been tearing apart Nick just so that the show can play with my feelings and leave me hanging for two weeks (next week is a 90 minute Morgan flashback episode it seems).

Fuck y'all again. Assholes.

I hadn't thought about that.  Maybe they are just tearing Nick apart.  Glen didnt seem to be in pain.  He really just seemed to be gathering his wits about him.  Lets hope.  Glen and Darryl are the main reasons I watch the show.

Um, he absolutely did look to be in pain, and there are shots of his chest that the zombies are tearing at, no Nick anywhere in sight. He's dead.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoiler's thread
Post by: viper37 on October 26, 2015, 01:26:24 PM
Quote from: lustindarkness on October 26, 2015, 09:48:53 AM
This is fucking bullshit. I dealt with 3 seasons worth of TWD spoilers on the TV/Movie thread. Fuck you all assholes! :mad:


Yes, I'm pissed. Either they killed Glen in a stupid way by a hated character OR he somehow rolled under the trash bin and the walkers had been tearing apart Nick just so that the show can play with my feelings and leave me hanging for two weeks (next week is a 90 minute Morgan flashback episode it seems).

Fuck y'all again. Assholes.

5 fan theories that keep hope alive (http://www.thewrap.com/is-that-walking-dead-character-really-dead-5-fan-theories-that-keep-hope-alive/)
6. Lady Melisandre Resurrects Glenn
:P
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoiler's thread
Post by: Solmyr on October 26, 2015, 01:37:47 PM
Actually, after reading this I am not so sure anymore...

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1520211/board/nest/249753948
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoiler's thread
Post by: crazy canuck on October 26, 2015, 01:39:06 PM
Quote from: Solmyr on October 26, 2015, 01:23:08 PM
Quote from: crazy canuck on October 26, 2015, 10:32:25 AM
Quote from: lustindarkness on October 26, 2015, 09:48:53 AM
This is fucking bullshit. I dealt with 3 seasons worth of TWD spoilers on the TV/Movie thread. Fuck you all assholes! :mad:


Yes, I'm pissed. Either they killed Glen in a stupid way by a hated character OR he somehow rolled under the trash bin and the walkers had been tearing apart Nick just so that the show can play with my feelings and leave me hanging for two weeks (next week is a 90 minute Morgan flashback episode it seems).

Fuck y'all again. Assholes.

I hadn't thought about that.  Maybe they are just tearing Nick apart.  Glen didnt seem to be in pain.  He really just seemed to be gathering his wits about him.  Lets hope.  Glen and Darryl are the main reasons I watch the show.

no Nick anywhere in sight.

Exactly, they fell together yet Nick is nowhere to be seen.  Nick could be on top of Glen, covering Glen's body and all we see is Glen's face.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoiler's thread
Post by: Josephus on October 26, 2015, 02:21:00 PM
I think Glen is dead. Otherwise it's a nasty tease.

That said: on Talking Dead, the writer/producer sent a note saying "You will be seeing Glen again in some form"...meaning a zombie?

RE: Rick. Whilst he can outpace the zombies, they do seem to be an awful lot of them on all sides, right? But iI've no doubt he will be rescued somehow.

Techncial issue: Are we going to talk comic book spoilers too?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoiler's thread
Post by: crazy canuck on October 26, 2015, 02:27:38 PM
Quote from: Josephus on October 26, 2015, 02:21:00 PM
RE: Rick. Whilst he can outpace the zombies, they do seem to be an awful lot of them on all sides, right? But iI've no doubt he will be rescued somehow.

Techncial issue: Are we going to talk comic book spoilers too?

Re: Rick, I wonder how they are going to deal with the cut - I suppose that leads to your technical question...
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoiler's thread
Post by: Josephus on October 26, 2015, 05:03:37 PM
Quote from: crazy canuck on October 26, 2015, 02:27:38 PM
Quote from: Josephus on October 26, 2015, 02:21:00 PM
RE: Rick. Whilst he can outpace the zombies, they do seem to be an awful lot of them on all sides, right? But iI've no doubt he will be rescued somehow.

Techncial issue: Are we going to talk comic book spoilers too?

Re: Rick, I wonder how they are going to deal with the cut - I suppose that leads to your technical question...
Yes. I dont read the comics, but on Talking Dead they alluded to something from the comic book that may affect Rick and his wound.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoiler's thread
Post by: Martinus on October 26, 2015, 05:08:00 PM
Quote from: viper37 on October 26, 2015, 08:14:11 AM
Quote from: Martinus on October 26, 2015, 01:50:23 AM
Quote from: The Brain on October 26, 2015, 12:02:32 AM
SPOILERS!

This. For fucks sake.
The Walking Dead spoiler's thread
The title should have given you some clues.

Yes, it is spelled SPOILERS! There is no apostrophye in a plural form - it only exists in the possessive Singular.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoiler's thread
Post by: Josquius on October 26, 2015, 05:36:53 PM
Glenn. Has to be dead.
At first it seemed they were going to a very unlikely survival with him being under the idiot's body and getting covered in gore as the other guy is eaten but considering the camera angles they shift to and the sheer amount of walkers around him... it would be stupid if they did that. I could see it protecting him for perhaps 5 minutes (though with his face sticking out...) but no rescue seems to be forthcoming. The walkers aren't going anywhere until they've eaten through the other guy to Glen (plus- his face is right there).
Kind of lame for him to go like that though, I was wondering why he didn't go up the fire escape either.

I was kind of confused about everything that was going on this episode. So...the horn took a large chunk of the horde away from the road, a bunch of civilians had been hiding in the woods watching them go (why? surely after building the fence they weren't needed anymore).
And...everyone completely fucks up getting away from the zombies. How?
The whole situation seems bizzarely set up to cause the maximum amount of red shirt deaths (and take down Glen too).

Rick... he shouldn't be in danger. But...the people he killed outside with the gun- were they kids? It was hard to get a good look. They certainly seemed quite small. He seems to be having issues over that.
I wonder whats up with his hand. Killing Glen would be one thing but killing Rick would just mess up the show.
Especially since we're running out of characters its easy to put a name to now.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoiler's thread
Post by: Grey Fox on October 26, 2015, 10:04:21 PM
So far when a member of the group dies, the actor/actress is on the Talking Dead that follows the episode. Yuen wasn't on that show. Imo, he's not 100% dead. Probably will be our Zombified. Plus they kept imphasing Glenn is wearing Maggie's dad watch.

I guess the show will finally modify Rick like the comic did.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoiler's thread
Post by: Tonitrus on October 26, 2015, 10:11:03 PM
I dunno...it seems that when zombies successfully eat someone, there isn't much left to become a zombie.

This zombie virus is ultimately self-defeating.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoiler's thread
Post by: Phillip V on October 26, 2015, 10:22:34 PM
Show is racist if the only Asian dies.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoiler's thread
Post by: viper37 on October 26, 2015, 10:47:43 PM
Quote from: Josephus on October 26, 2015, 02:21:00 PM
Techncial issue: Are we going to talk comic book spoilers too?
Use the spoiler tag then, please.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoiler's thread
Post by: Jaron on October 26, 2015, 10:51:51 PM
Quote from: Tonitrus on October 26, 2015, 10:11:03 PM
I dunno...it seems that when zombies successfully eat someone, there isn't much left to become a zombie.

This zombie virus is ultimately self-defeating.

Isn't everyone infected though? So it seems as long as humans exist/breed there will be new zombies. I am not sure if it passes from mothers to infants, but I assume it does.

Don't zombies continue to decay? I assume at some point (10 years? 20 years?) the bodies would have decayed so much that the initial zombie horde would no longer be a great threat.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josquius on October 27, 2015, 03:02:40 AM
Quote from: Tonitrus on October 26, 2015, 10:11:03 PM
I dunno...it seems that when zombies successfully eat someone, there isn't much left to become a zombie.

This zombie virus is ultimately self-defeating.
Zombies are shit.
Most of the time they don't successfully overwhelm and eat someone, they just manage to bite them before they get away.

Though yes. Traditional zombies stand little chance of overthrowing civilization even with people collectively acting dumb.
It seems likely that in the walking dead world it's just the us like that. Sean of the Dead is set in the same universe. :p
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tamas on October 27, 2015, 05:10:22 AM
Somebody somewhere claimed the zombies in Walking Dead are a metaphor to life in general: it is not that hard to avoid or overcome the difficulties presented, but they are ever-present, and one day you will let your guard down, or run out of luck, and you are fucked.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoiler's thread
Post by: Solmyr on October 27, 2015, 06:32:51 AM
Quote from: Phillip V on October 26, 2015, 10:22:34 PM
Show is racist if the only Asian dies.

Every black dude on the show so far has died.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Grey Fox on October 27, 2015, 07:20:47 AM
There are atleast 2 alive right now that we know their name. Crazy.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: viper37 on October 27, 2015, 09:13:12 AM
Quote from: Tyr on October 27, 2015, 03:02:40 AM
Quote from: Tonitrus on October 26, 2015, 10:11:03 PM
I dunno...it seems that when zombies successfully eat someone, there isn't much left to become a zombie.

This zombie virus is ultimately self-defeating.
Zombies are shit.
Most of the time they don't successfully overwhelm and eat someone, they just manage to bite them before they get away.

Though yes. Traditional zombies stand little chance of overthrowing civilization even with people collectively acting dumb.
It seems likely that in the walking dead world it's just the us like that. Sean of the Dead is set in the same universe. :p
basically, get out of the big cities, build in the desert or mountains, clear trees to get a clear line of vision and build high walls.  Organize supply raids in groups, extend walls as needed to build farms and cultivate your own food, kill zombies as they appear.
But, as we learn, the real dangers ain't the zombies, it's what the people do once there's no authority.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: KRonn on October 27, 2015, 10:22:02 AM
But, as we learn, the real dangers ain't the zombies, it's what the people do once there's no authority.

Yep, that seems the biggest factor. The walkers/zombies, though deadly, are often more like a side issue or nuisance to work around, except of course when they herd up.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Grey Fox on October 27, 2015, 10:36:01 AM
but the latest episode also shows that giving the right circumstances Zombies are a real threat.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: crazy canuck on October 27, 2015, 10:39:37 AM
Quote from: Grey Fox on October 27, 2015, 10:36:01 AM
but the latest episode also shows that giving the right circumstances Zombies are a real threat.

Sure, the world can be a dangerous place from time to time but that is the exception rather than the rule.  Like Tamas said, a number of observers have commented that the zombie apocalypse is a good metaphor for all the dangers we face.  Sometimes Life Bites.  :D but most of the time the danger is in the background.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: lustindarkness on October 27, 2015, 10:58:00 AM
Walkers = http://languish.org/forums/index.php/topic,12981.0.html ?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Scipio on October 27, 2015, 11:13:58 AM
When will they finally kill Carl?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on October 27, 2015, 11:16:52 AM
Quote from: Scipio on October 27, 2015, 11:13:58 AM
When will they finally kill Carl?

But Carl's the future of mankind. they can't kill him.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Grey Fox on October 27, 2015, 11:22:26 AM
Quote from: Scipio on October 27, 2015, 11:13:58 AM
When will they finally kill Carl?

Rick, Carl & imo, Darryl will make it to the end of the series.

I don't get Carl hate. He's the only child that understand that the world has changed.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: KRonn on October 27, 2015, 01:20:55 PM
I like Carl. The kid has come a long way, progressed from a young kid into a strong and competent youngster in tough times.
It's kind of scary though wondering who will be on the chopping block to get killed off. 
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: viper37 on October 27, 2015, 05:21:14 PM
Quote from: Grey Fox on October 27, 2015, 10:36:01 AM
but the latest episode also shows that giving the right circumstances Zombies are a real threat.
the zombies became a threat because humans attacked other humans and that made a lot of noise.  Without it, the zombies would have been herded peacefully far away from Alexandria.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tonitrus on October 27, 2015, 09:18:48 PM
More "evidence" that Glenn survives. (note: link may have comics spoilers)

http://io9.com/the-walking-deads-latest-mystery-may-already-have-been-1738856384
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on October 28, 2015, 04:19:51 PM
interesting, but I don't see the video they're talking about that purports to show picture of Glenn in future episode.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josquius on October 28, 2015, 04:26:42 PM
http://www.etonline.com/news/171976_exclusive_has_the_walking_dead_cast_paul_jesus_monroe_see_first_look_photos_from_set/

But it appears to be a behind the scenes photo. It could be they were just filming scenes for an episode with Glenn in the same place as an episode without him.

But...it does all seem rather suspicious that there's such a big mystery around it. Makes me suspect he may well be back- somebody comes running in to save him from the horde right after we left the scene?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Grey Fox on October 28, 2015, 05:41:47 PM
The whisperers...
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on October 28, 2015, 07:02:11 PM
to be honest I'm find with Glenn dying now. I think that having him miraculously survive a horde of zombies may cheapen it all. Since the little girl died coming out of the tool shed, I've gotten used to the idea that main characters die on The Walking Dead, that's always been its appeal.

Comic Spoiler:

[spoiler]And though I don't read the comics, I'm to understand that Glenn dies in it (albeit in different circumstnces involving a baseball bat([/spoiler]
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Queequeg on October 29, 2015, 02:46:09 AM
Quote from: KRonn on October 27, 2015, 10:22:02 AM
But, as we learn, the real dangers ain't the zombies, it's what the people do once there's no authority.

Yep, that seems the biggest factor. The walkers/zombies, though deadly, are often more like a side issue or nuisance to work around, except of course when they herd up.
IDK.  I kind of suspect that the big problem, at least initially, would be mental illness.  You'd quickly be seeing cases of PTSD like we can't even imagine.  People aren't programmed to fight off reanimated stinking corpses of their loved ones that are trying to break open their chest cavity and eat their organs raw.  I think a lot of people would give up.  I might.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tamas on October 29, 2015, 05:12:48 AM
Quote from: Queequeg on October 29, 2015, 02:46:09 AM
Quote from: KRonn on October 27, 2015, 10:22:02 AM
But, as we learn, the real dangers ain't the zombies, it's what the people do once there's no authority.

Yep, that seems the biggest factor. The walkers/zombies, though deadly, are often more like a side issue or nuisance to work around, except of course when they herd up.
IDK.  I kind of suspect that the big problem, at least initially, would be mental illness.  You'd quickly be seeing cases of PTSD like we can't even imagine.  People aren't programmed to fight off reanimated stinking corpses of their loved ones that are trying to break open their chest cavity and eat their organs raw.  I think a lot of people would give up.  I might.

I think PTSD is overrated. Our great-grandpas and grandfathers went through horrors in the World Wars we can't even imagine. But they (most of them) dealt with it and built normal lives.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: lustindarkness on October 29, 2015, 06:49:21 AM
Quote from: Tamas on October 29, 2015, 05:12:48 AM
Quote from: Queequeg on October 29, 2015, 02:46:09 AM
Quote from: KRonn on October 27, 2015, 10:22:02 AM
But, as we learn, the real dangers ain't the zombies, it's what the people do once there's no authority.

Yep, that seems the biggest factor. The walkers/zombies, though deadly, are often more like a side issue or nuisance to work around, except of course when they herd up.
IDK.  I kind of suspect that the big problem, at least initially, would be mental illness.  You'd quickly be seeing cases of PTSD like we can't even imagine.  People aren't programmed to fight off reanimated stinking corpses of their loved ones that are trying to break open their chest cavity and eat their organs raw.  I think a lot of people would give up.  I might.

I think PTSD is overrated. Our great-grandpas and grandfathers went through horrors in the World Wars we can't even imagine. But they (most of them) dealt with it and built normal lives.

You have no idea what you are talking about.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Queequeg on October 29, 2015, 07:52:15 AM
Quote from: Tamas on October 29, 2015, 05:12:48 AM
Quote from: Queequeg on October 29, 2015, 02:46:09 AM
Quote from: KRonn on October 27, 2015, 10:22:02 AM
But, as we learn, the real dangers ain't the zombies, it's what the people do once there's no authority.

Yep, that seems the biggest factor. The walkers/zombies, though deadly, are often more like a side issue or nuisance to work around, except of course when they herd up.
IDK.  I kind of suspect that the big problem, at least initially, would be mental illness.  You'd quickly be seeing cases of PTSD like we can't even imagine.  People aren't programmed to fight off reanimated stinking corpses of their loved ones that are trying to break open their chest cavity and eat their organs raw.  I think a lot of people would give up.  I might.

I think PTSD is overrated. Our great-grandpas and grandfathers went through horrors in the World Wars we can't even imagine. But they (most of them) dealt with it and built normal lives.

World War One veterans went on to live normal lives?

They threw a second, bigger world war 20 years later.  The Russian Revolution.  Nazism.  Fascism.   :huh:
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: viper37 on October 29, 2015, 08:17:16 AM
Quote from: Tamas on October 29, 2015, 05:12:48 AM
I think PTSD is overrated. Our great-grandpas and grandfathers went through horrors in the World Wars we can't even imagine. But they (most of them) dealt with it and built normal lives.
It was called "shell-shock" then.  Or treated as cowardice, hence why many got shot/hanged by their own troops.
but even in modern war, where PTSD is diagnosed, the majority of soldiers don't come back with PTSD.  That does not make it overrated, imho. It's like saying "malaria is overrated, most of our soldiers in WWII died from ennemy bullets, not some silly microbe".  Yet, we vaccinate soldiers against all kind of diseases for the places they are sent to.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: viper37 on October 29, 2015, 08:18:03 AM
Quote from: Queequeg on October 29, 2015, 07:52:15 AM
Quote from: Tamas on October 29, 2015, 05:12:48 AM
Quote from: Queequeg on October 29, 2015, 02:46:09 AM
Quote from: KRonn on October 27, 2015, 10:22:02 AM
But, as we learn, the real dangers ain't the zombies, it's what the people do once there's no authority.

Yep, that seems the biggest factor. The walkers/zombies, though deadly, are often more like a side issue or nuisance to work around, except of course when they herd up.
IDK.  I kind of suspect that the big problem, at least initially, would be mental illness.  You'd quickly be seeing cases of PTSD like we can't even imagine.  People aren't programmed to fight off reanimated stinking corpses of their loved ones that are trying to break open their chest cavity and eat their organs raw.  I think a lot of people would give up.  I might.

I think PTSD is overrated. Our great-grandpas and grandfathers went through horrors in the World Wars we can't even imagine. But they (most of them) dealt with it and built normal lives.

World War One veterans went on to live normal lives?

They threw a second, bigger world war 20 years later.  The Russian Revolution.  Nazism.  Fascism.   :huh:
that's normal behavior.  it's the european peace that came after WWII that was abnormal ;)
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tamas on October 29, 2015, 12:49:11 PM
Fine, fine, I was wrong!
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tamas on October 29, 2015, 12:50:40 PM
BUT I still disagree with Psellus: people wouldn't throw up their hands and die by the masses during a zombie apocalypse just because they couldn't face the new reality. Some would. Decisive majority would struggle on to survive.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Eddie Teach on October 29, 2015, 01:00:34 PM
Quote from: Tamas on October 29, 2015, 12:50:40 PM
BUT I still disagree with Psellus: people wouldn't throw up their hands and die by the masses during a zombie apocalypse just because they couldn't face the new reality. Some would. Decisive majority would struggle on to survive.

I think most zombie apocalypse scenarios have the majority dying before they even really know what's happening.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tamas on October 29, 2015, 01:02:13 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on October 29, 2015, 01:00:34 PM
Quote from: Tamas on October 29, 2015, 12:50:40 PM
BUT I still disagree with Psellus: people wouldn't throw up their hands and die by the masses during a zombie apocalypse just because they couldn't face the new reality. Some would. Decisive majority would struggle on to survive.

I think most zombie apocalypse scenarios have the majority dying before they even really know what's happening.

:rolleyes: ok, majority of survivors of the initial apocalypse, then.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: lustindarkness on November 01, 2015, 10:49:44 PM
Morgan's episode was The Good, even if a bit slow, very well done.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Razgovory on November 01, 2015, 11:54:20 PM
Quote from: lustindarkness on October 29, 2015, 06:49:21 AM
Quote from: Tamas on October 29, 2015, 05:12:48 AM
Quote from: Queequeg on October 29, 2015, 02:46:09 AM
Quote from: KRonn on October 27, 2015, 10:22:02 AM
But, as we learn, the real dangers ain't the zombies, it's what the people do once there's no authority.

Yep, that seems the biggest factor. The walkers/zombies, though deadly, are often more like a side issue or nuisance to work around, except of course when they herd up.
IDK.  I kind of suspect that the big problem, at least initially, would be mental illness.  You'd quickly be seeing cases of PTSD like we can't even imagine.  People aren't programmed to fight off reanimated stinking corpses of their loved ones that are trying to break open their chest cavity and eat their organs raw.  I think a lot of people would give up.  I might.

I think PTSD is overrated. Our great-grandpas and grandfathers went through horrors in the World Wars we can't even imagine. But they (most of them) dealt with it and built normal lives.

You have no idea what you are talking about.

In his defense, the term "PTSD" gets thrown around quite a bit to describe a wide variety of combat related mental illness.  Everything from conversion disorders to brain damage.  When you see people with very severe problems in the news they often use "PTSD" to describe it when it's actually something far more serious like psychosis.  Not to say it "PTSD" isn't bad, flashbacks are not fun, but it's not the same as having the irresistible compulsion to kill everyone you meet.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on November 02, 2015, 10:05:08 AM
Quote from: lustindarkness on November 01, 2015, 10:49:44 PM
Morgan's episode was The Good, even if a bit slow, very well done.

Right. Forgot about this thread.

Yes, I was quite impressed. Brilliant acting by both. Well staged. Found it quite gripping. An Emmy winner for sure. (Or Grammy, whatever they give out TV awards for)
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: KRonn on November 02, 2015, 10:21:12 AM
Great episode. I wasn't expecting a full 90 mins on Morgan but found it an interesting change of pace and also a much needed backstory on Morgan.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: crazy canuck on November 02, 2015, 11:12:06 AM
It was a very good episode.  But I think their timing of showing this standalone bit was poor.  We were all waiting to see what was going happened to Rick.  I really don't care much about Morgan's backstory now.  It would have been a lot better if we had seen that earlier in the season.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on November 02, 2015, 11:21:30 AM
Maybe CC. But it was probably a matter of pacing the story. It's only 4 episodes in? If they did it earlier, people would whine that there's not enough action. I guess they wanted to start off quickly. Where would you have thrown it in? It had to be after the wolf attack, IMO, because it adds mystery to Morgan's character. Why is he using a javelin pole and not a gun? It could have replaced episode 3, perhaps, but that would have been problematic because episodes 2 and 3 were happening at the same time.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: crazy canuck on November 02, 2015, 11:39:05 AM
Quote from: Josephus on November 02, 2015, 11:21:30 AM
Maybe CC. But it was probably a matter of pacing the story. It's only 4 episodes in? If they did it earlier, people would whine that there's not enough action. I guess they wanted to start off quickly. Where would you have thrown it in? It had to be after the wolf attack, IMO, because it adds mystery to Morgan's character. Why is he using a javelin pole and not a gun? It could have replaced episode 3, perhaps, but that would have been problematic because episodes 2 and 3 were happening at the same time.

The question of using the pole rather than all of the guns he once had was introduced when Moran first encountered the Wolves - remember the scene where he fights them off in the forest, puts them in a car and leaves them without killing them.  The way they wrote the episodes doesn't allow it to be fit in anywhere particularly well.  That really goes to my point that as a stand alone episode it was great but in the flow of this series it was awkward since it just delayed the telling the of the story the audience was anxious to hear.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: lustindarkness on November 02, 2015, 12:15:47 PM
:hmm: TWD delaying the answer of a cliffhanger for another week? Nah, never would happen.  :rolleyes:
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: crazy canuck on November 02, 2015, 12:17:26 PM
Well yeah.  That's the point.  They turned what was an excellent episode into mere filler to delay the story line we really wanted to see answered. 
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: lustindarkness on November 02, 2015, 12:54:46 PM
I was The Sad when Tabitha died. :(
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: crazy canuck on November 02, 2015, 12:56:38 PM
Brain, did you hack his account  :mad:
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: lustindarkness on November 02, 2015, 12:56:52 PM
Oh, BTW, I think the voice at the end asking for the gate to be opened is Rick, kinda hard to tell.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: lustindarkness on November 02, 2015, 12:57:46 PM
Quote from: crazy canuck on November 02, 2015, 12:56:38 PM
Brain, did you hack his account  :mad:

:lol: No, I was sad, poor goat never did any harm to anyone.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Queequeg on November 02, 2015, 01:24:22 PM
Quote from: Tamas on October 29, 2015, 12:50:40 PM
BUT I still disagree with Psellus: people wouldn't throw up their hands and die by the masses during a zombie apocalypse just because they couldn't face the new reality. Some would. Decisive majority would struggle on to survive.
Within a key period, a large part of the population would not be able to deal with the fact that the dead are rising up and eating the living.  And then after that there'd be PTSD to deal with.  IDK what would happen.  Neither would you.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on November 02, 2015, 06:10:09 PM
I often think how I would survive in that world. Join a group and go on a long walk ,a la TWD, or would I hole up in an apartment with as much food as i can loot hope for the best. I think I'd hole myself up.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Eddie Teach on November 02, 2015, 06:48:41 PM
Quote from: Josephus on November 02, 2015, 06:10:09 PM
I often think how I would survive in that world. Join a group and go on a long walk ,a la TWD, or would I hole up in an apartment with as much food as i can loot hope for the best. I think I'd hole myself up.

You'll probably change your mind after a few months or years of isolation.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Admiral Yi on November 02, 2015, 06:55:49 PM
I think people would try to band with others who are a net asset to survival and try to ditch those who are a net liability.  So much like high school.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tonitrus on November 02, 2015, 08:36:04 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on November 02, 2015, 06:48:41 PM
Quote from: Josephus on November 02, 2015, 06:10:09 PM
I often think how I would survive in that world. Join a group and go on a long walk ,a la TWD, or would I hole up in an apartment with as much food as i can loot hope for the best. I think I'd hole myself up.

You'll probably change your mind after a few months or years of isolation.

Well, realistically, his holed-up-in-an-apartment food would last a few weeks tops.  Even less time if one assumes the water system to apartment blocks effectively shuts down.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on November 02, 2015, 10:00:50 PM
Quote from: Tonitrus on November 02, 2015, 08:36:04 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on November 02, 2015, 06:48:41 PM
Quote from: Josephus on November 02, 2015, 06:10:09 PM
I often think how I would survive in that world. Join a group and go on a long walk ,a la TWD, or would I hole up in an apartment with as much food as i can loot hope for the best. I think I'd hole myself up.

You'll probably change your mind after a few months or years of isolation.

Well, realistically, his holed-up-in-an-apartment food would last a few weeks tops.  Even less time if one assumes the water system to apartment blocks effectively shuts down.

Bottled water :)

But yeah, my plan doesn't have longterm appeal. But I could go out scavenging now and then. It's just than, I'm almost 50, won't survive long battling zombies at my age.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Eddie Teach on November 02, 2015, 10:52:38 PM
Quote from: Josephus on November 02, 2015, 10:00:50 PM
It's just than, I'm almost 50, won't survive long battling zombies at my age.

So is Morgan. And Carol.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josquius on November 03, 2015, 02:56:27 AM
It was OK.  Still doesn't really answer the real questions. Like just how did he get so Fucked up. Clearing people and writing crazy shit like that... I thought rick had already pulled him back?
Why is it people are surviving happily until the moment they meet a protagonist when suddenly stupid disease overrides survival?
Just what is the W guys issue?

Though I guess it does confirm that WD  zombies hate animals
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on November 03, 2015, 07:47:31 AM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on November 02, 2015, 10:52:38 PM
Quote from: Josephus on November 02, 2015, 10:00:50 PM
It's just than, I'm almost 50, won't survive long battling zombies at my age.

So is Morgan. And Carol.

Both of them can kick the shit out of me.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Grey Fox on November 03, 2015, 09:19:52 AM
In a zombie apocalypse, I would be in charge. Like that guy from Book of Eli.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: crazy canuck on November 03, 2015, 11:13:01 AM
Quote from: Josephus on November 03, 2015, 07:47:31 AM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on November 02, 2015, 10:52:38 PM
Quote from: Josephus on November 02, 2015, 10:00:50 PM
It's just than, I'm almost 50, won't survive long battling zombies at my age.

So is Morgan. And Carol.

Both of them can kick the shit out of me.

Both needed some toughening up in the beginning too.  Carol's character development is a great part of the show.  Go back and watch some of those early episodes on Netflix and watch how her character started out.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on November 03, 2015, 11:32:30 AM
Quote from: crazy canuck on November 03, 2015, 11:13:01 AM
Quote from: Josephus on November 03, 2015, 07:47:31 AM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on November 02, 2015, 10:52:38 PM
Quote from: Josephus on November 02, 2015, 10:00:50 PM
It's just than, I'm almost 50, won't survive long battling zombies at my age.

So is Morgan. And Carol.

Both of them can kick the shit out of me.

Both needed some toughening up in the beginning too.  Carol's character development is a great part of the show.  Go back and watch some of those early episodes on Netflix and watch how her character started out.

yes, I remember her from the first season. Wife-beater husband and zombie daughter. She has been through a lot.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: KRonn on November 03, 2015, 01:47:39 PM
Quote from: crazy canuck on November 03, 2015, 11:13:01 AM
Quote from: Josephus on November 03, 2015, 07:47:31 AM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on November 02, 2015, 10:52:38 PM
Quote from: Josephus on November 02, 2015, 10:00:50 PM
It's just than, I'm almost 50, won't survive long battling zombies at my age.

So is Morgan. And Carol.

Both of them can kick the shit out of me.

Both needed some toughening up in the beginning too.  Carol's character development is a great part of the show.  Go back and watch some of those early episodes on Netflix and watch how her character started out.

Yeah, Carol has gone through a huge character development change. She's become pretty damn awesome actually.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: crazy canuck on November 03, 2015, 01:56:19 PM
Quote from: KRonn on November 03, 2015, 01:47:39 PM
Quote from: crazy canuck on November 03, 2015, 11:13:01 AM
Quote from: Josephus on November 03, 2015, 07:47:31 AM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on November 02, 2015, 10:52:38 PM
Quote from: Josephus on November 02, 2015, 10:00:50 PM
It's just than, I'm almost 50, won't survive long battling zombies at my age.

So is Morgan. And Carol.

Both of them can kick the shit out of me.

Both needed some toughening up in the beginning too.  Carol's character development is a great part of the show.  Go back and watch some of those early episodes on Netflix and watch how her character started out.

Yeah, Carol has gone through a huge character development change. She's become pretty damn awesome actually.

Scary is the way I would describe it.  I am not sure the good hearted Carol is actually still in there.  Part of what makes the character great in this series.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: KRonn on November 03, 2015, 02:42:34 PM
Agreed on that. I'm waiting to see what her character becomes. She could certainly become more scary, or perhaps continue to be a strong member of the group. So far a tough minded person, and one who is able to play the sweet home maker and ingratiating herself with everyone, mainly as a ploy to keep a watch on things and others. She has certainly shown her tough resourcefulness a number of times before Alexandria, such as at Terminus where she smeared Walker blood on her to mingle with the Walkers, then get close enough to blow up a fuel tank at Terminus to help the group escape. Scary or unpredictable in how she killed a couple of sick people back at the prison.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Admiral Yi on November 03, 2015, 02:45:50 PM
You can trick a zombie with makeup?  I thought they operated on smell or something like that.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: crazy canuck on November 03, 2015, 02:59:11 PM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on November 03, 2015, 02:45:50 PM
You can trick a zombie with makeup?  I thought they operated on smell or something like that.

That's why she used Walker blood. ;)
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tonitrus on November 03, 2015, 09:35:15 PM
Quote from: crazy canuck on November 03, 2015, 02:59:11 PM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on November 03, 2015, 02:45:50 PM
You can trick a zombie with makeup?  I thought they operated on smell or something like that.

That's why she used Walker blood. ;)

Yeah, I think they established that in the first couple episodes of the show, that smearing yourself in zombie guts makes for legit zombie-camo.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on November 04, 2015, 08:49:00 AM
..which might be how Glenn escapes.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: crazy canuck on November 04, 2015, 09:45:39 AM
Quote from: Josephus on November 04, 2015, 08:49:00 AM
..which might be how Glenn escapes.

:cool:
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: KRonn on November 04, 2015, 10:49:54 AM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on November 03, 2015, 02:45:50 PM
You can trick a zombie with makeup?  I thought they operated on smell or something like that.

Early in the shows (first season maybe) when we first meet Michone (when she rescued Andrea) she traveled with two zombies she pulled along with chains. They had their arms and lower jaws ripped off as apparently when they can't eat they become docile, don't attack and aren't really dangerous. Later in the series someone else briefly did the same thing, I forget who. If I remember right, Michone would later say that those two were her ex-husband and his friend or something, and that they had failed her in some way, maybe ran off and didn't protect her baby from walkers. When they died and turned she used them as walker shields. Not sure how they died, I assume they got sick, don't think or know if Michone killed them.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tonitrus on November 09, 2015, 01:04:48 AM
Boring, filler/talky episode.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on November 09, 2015, 06:35:05 AM
There were a couple times in that tunnel, Maggie's English accent really came to the fore. She's done a good job of hiding it up to this point, but if you listen you'll really notice it in this episode.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: crazy canuck on November 09, 2015, 09:17:24 AM
Quote from: Josephus on November 09, 2015, 06:35:05 AM
There were a couple times in that tunnel, Maggie's English accent really came to the fore. She's done a good job of hiding it up to this point, but if you listen you'll really notice it in this episode.

Yeah, I thought the same thing.  Also, a bit of a let down to see Rick simply running down the road without any explanation of how he got that far.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: viper37 on November 09, 2015, 09:58:36 AM
Next week we will learn if Daryl&co all survive the trip.  We will see if Michonne gets back in town, maybe.  Then we will go back to Alexandria to see these walls buckle under the massive weight of all those walkers.  Then the black sniper girl in the tower will valiantly snipe a hundred walkers until they swarm the base of that tower and make it crash on the ground killing her shortly after.

Also, about Glenn, getting himself splattered by Nicholas blood would not do much to protect him from the zombies.  You need zombie blood, but Nicholas was still human, he hadn't turn yet.

Oh, and why do they insist on using small knives instead of long spears?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: lustindarkness on November 09, 2015, 10:13:52 AM
It was an OK episode. Two things that bothered me:
1) Why would Rick lead that horde to the community? (other than it was in the script). 2) No Carol in this episode :(.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on November 09, 2015, 01:50:00 PM
I don't think he led them there. They were heading there, he was running from them.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: viper37 on November 09, 2015, 01:55:44 PM
Quote from: lustindarkness on November 09, 2015, 10:13:52 AM
It was an OK episode. Two things that bothered me:
1) Why would Rick lead that horde to the community? (other than it was in the script). 2) No Carol in this episode :(.
#1, as seen in the episode where rick is trapped in his truck with a horde of walkers coming at him, they were directly heading for Alexandria.  At this point, there is nothing a guy running can do to divert them from anywhere.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on November 09, 2015, 02:47:15 PM
Interestingly, to me, the father in law of the actor who plays Rick is this guy:

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi152.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fs175%2Fjosephus-07%2Fian%2520anderston.jpg&hash=8795704697e891ded84be4ae09bcc0dc98e3dbfe) (http://s152.photobucket.com/user/josephus-07/media/ian%20anderston.jpg.html)
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: viper37 on November 09, 2015, 02:48:17 PM
And that would be...?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Pedrito on November 09, 2015, 03:09:28 PM
Quote from: viper37 on November 09, 2015, 02:48:17 PM
And that would be...?
Jethro Tull's lead singer Ian Anderson

L.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: viper37 on November 09, 2015, 03:17:52 PM
ah ok, the guys who won a metal of the year award instead of Metallica so many years ago.  Got it, thanks :)
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josquius on November 09, 2015, 04:13:59 PM
Sewer zombies were interesting, how rotten they were....
Which leads to a thought- surely the brain will be one of the earlier parts to go?
So...the knife through the head to kill them thing....its some kind of magical mumbo jumbo rather than destroy the brain (which when you think about it never really made sense- a knife anywhere in the head does it, not a specific part...)
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: viper37 on November 09, 2015, 04:26:23 PM
Quote from: Tyr on November 09, 2015, 04:13:59 PM
Sewer zombies were interesting, how rotten they were....
Which leads to a thought- surely the brain will be one of the earlier parts to go?
So...the knife through the head to kill them thing....its some kind of magical mumbo jumbo rather than destroy the brain (which when you think about it never really made sense- a knife anywhere in the head does it, not a specific part...)
I think it's been established in zombie lore since... Night of the living dead, maybe? That you need to destroy the brain to kill a zombie.
And apparently, "destroy the brain" means piercing it anywhere or smashing it.  So, anything that pierces the brain anywhere will do.

Why?  I don't know.

Which part of the body should decompose first in a sewer, the brain or the heart, I don't know.

Also, I do not know how a virus that kills the host could maintain control over the entire body by simply residing in the brain, and how it could actively nourrish itself by being isolated from all other parts of the body.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on November 09, 2015, 06:08:46 PM
Quote from: viper37 on November 09, 2015, 03:17:52 PM
ah ok, the guys who won a metal of the year award instead of Metallica so many years ago.  Got it, thanks :)

Yup. He's not the son in law of all them though...just the lead singer, flautist and codpiece wearer.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tonitrus on November 09, 2015, 08:21:18 PM
Quote from: viper37 on November 09, 2015, 04:26:23 PM
Quote from: Tyr on November 09, 2015, 04:13:59 PM
Sewer zombies were interesting, how rotten they were....
Which leads to a thought- surely the brain will be one of the earlier parts to go?
So...the knife through the head to kill them thing....its some kind of magical mumbo jumbo rather than destroy the brain (which when you think about it never really made sense- a knife anywhere in the head does it, not a specific part...)
I think it's been established in zombie lore since... Night of the living dead, maybe? That you need to destroy the brain to kill a zombie.
And apparently, "destroy the brain" means piercing it anywhere or smashing it.  So, anything that pierces the brain anywhere will do.

Why?  I don't know.

Which part of the body should decompose first in a sewer, the brain or the heart, I don't know.

Also, I do not know how a virus that kills the host could maintain control over the entire body by simply residing in the brain, and how it could actively nourrish itself by being isolated from all other parts of the body.

Yeah, they kinda tried to explain it in S1 at the CDC by implying that the zombie virus kinda "jump started" the very basic, bare minimum survival function of the human brain (e.g. eat to live).  Which still doesn't explain overall zombie-rot...but naturally, fantasy has to kick in at some point.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Admiral Yi on November 09, 2015, 08:50:47 PM
Quote from: Josephus on November 09, 2015, 06:08:46 PM
flautist

Check out the big brain on Jo Jo.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: viper37 on November 10, 2015, 09:31:40 AM
Quote from: Tonitrus on November 09, 2015, 08:21:18 PM
Which still doesn't explain overall zombie-rot...
I guess since there is circulatory system, there is nothing to repair tissue damage occuring over time.

But anyway, zombies or vampires or werevolves, at some point, like you say, fantasy has to kick in.  there's only so much they can do.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: KRonn on November 10, 2015, 10:03:38 AM
Quote from: viper37 on November 09, 2015, 09:58:36 AM
Next week we will learn if Daryl&co all survive the trip.  We will see if Michonne gets back in town, maybe.  Then we will go back to Alexandria to see these walls buckle under the massive weight of all those walkers.  Then the black sniper girl in the tower will valiantly snipe a hundred walkers until they swarm the base of that tower and make it crash on the ground killing her shortly after.

Also, about Glenn, getting himself splattered by Nicholas blood would not do much to protect him from the zombies.  You need zombie blood, but Nicholas was still human, he hadn't turn yet.

Oh, and why do they insist on using small knives instead of long spears?
More suspense as the next week's previews show Daryl being injured. On this week's show they hadn't heard from Sasha and Benjamin. Michone had already gotten back though, three of them, and the wounded guy is in the clinic being treated. He was the one the medical tech was trying to figure out how to treat.

As for spear or knife, I often wonder about this too. For me, I'd want a long weapon so I don't have to get in close with more risk of getting bitten. But I think for one thing that they can keep a knife in a sheath where with a spear they'd need to keep it in hand, or I guess they could make a sheath for it like Michone with her sword.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: viper37 on November 10, 2015, 10:07:13 AM
Quote from: KRonn on November 10, 2015, 10:03:38 AM
More suspense as the next week's previews show Daryl being injured. On this week's show they hadn't heard from Sasha and Benjamin. Michone had already gotten back though, three of them, and the wounded guy is in the clinic being treated. He was the one the medical tech was trying to figure out how to treat.
ah, right, I totally forgot that, thanks :)

Quote
As for spear or knife, I often wonder about this too. For me, I'd want a long weapon so I don't have to get in close with more risk of getting bitten. But I think for one thing that they can keep a knife in a sheath where with a spear they'd need to keep it in hand, or I guess they could make a sheath for it like Michone with her sword.
Well, having a knife on you while you walk the streets of Alexandria, I get it.  But when you go out on a supply run, imho, it's more practical to have a spear.  But I suppose it's easier to have actors use a knife than train them to use a spear.  And it likely reduces risks of injuries when they fight real people instead of a special effect doll.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josquius on November 10, 2015, 11:31:07 AM
I was thinking about the spear thing yesterday too.
When it comes to going out scavenging I'm not so sure which is best but for e.g. zombies at the fence, a spear would be much better
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: crazy canuck on November 10, 2015, 11:41:11 AM
Quote from: Tyr on November 10, 2015, 11:31:07 AM
I was thinking about the spear thing yesterday too.
When it comes to going out scavenging I'm not so sure which is best but for e.g. zombies at the fence, a spear would be much better

The series has moved off of the original premise which was that even scratch could cause a living person to turn.  Remember back when they used to put on body armour if they were going to engage in close combat with the Walkers.  Once the only risk became being bitten by very slow moving creatures knives became more viable.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on November 10, 2015, 12:20:47 PM
Quote from: viper37 on November 10, 2015, 09:31:40 AM
Quote from: Tonitrus on November 09, 2015, 08:21:18 PM
Which still doesn't explain overall zombie-rot...
I guess since there is circulatory system, there is nothing to repair tissue damage occuring over time.

But anyway, zombies or vampires or werevolves, at some point, like you say, fantasy has to kick in.  there's only so much they can do.

yeah. I have some issues with the zombie myth (for instance if they eat their prey, where are they all coming from?) but yeah, at some point you have to allow for the fact that...zombies are fantastical creatures.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on November 10, 2015, 12:23:40 PM
Quote from: crazy canuck on November 10, 2015, 11:41:11 AM
Quote from: Tyr on November 10, 2015, 11:31:07 AM
I was thinking about the spear thing yesterday too.
When it comes to going out scavenging I'm not so sure which is best but for e.g. zombies at the fence, a spear would be much better

The series has moved off of the original premise which was that even scratch could cause a living person to turn.  Remember back when they used to put on body armour if they were going to engage in close combat with the Walkers.  Once the only risk became being bitten by very slow moving creatures knives became more viable.

Don't forget it's death that causes you to turn, not a scratch, nor a bite. The bite, I imagine, causes infection which causes you to die.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on November 10, 2015, 12:24:17 PM
So a new character is announced:

http://www.ew.com/article/2015/11/10/the-walking-dead-jeffrey-dean-morgan-negan?hootPostID=f1f2d06b4544dea2ccce4388668cbd74

comic book spoiler: [spoiler]Glenn's killer?[/spoiler]
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: crazy canuck on November 10, 2015, 12:29:46 PM
Quote from: Josephus on November 10, 2015, 12:23:40 PM
Quote from: crazy canuck on November 10, 2015, 11:41:11 AM
Quote from: Tyr on November 10, 2015, 11:31:07 AM
I was thinking about the spear thing yesterday too.
When it comes to going out scavenging I'm not so sure which is best but for e.g. zombies at the fence, a spear would be much better

The series has moved off of the original premise which was that even scratch could cause a living person to turn.  Remember back when they used to put on body armour if they were going to engage in close combat with the Walkers.  Once the only risk became being bitten by very slow moving creatures knives became more viable.

Don't forget it's death that causes you to turn, not a scratch, nor a bite. The bite, I imagine, causes infection which causes you to die.

That is not how it worked early in the series.  A person did not need to die to be turned.  A scratch would could do it.  But that fell away after, iirc, season 1.  The zombies were too dangerous to tell the story I guess.

Quote from: Josephus on November 10, 2015, 12:20:47 PM
Quote from: viper37 on November 10, 2015, 09:31:40 AM
Quote from: Tonitrus on November 09, 2015, 08:21:18 PM
Which still doesn't explain overall zombie-rot...
I guess since there is circulatory system, there is nothing to repair tissue damage occuring over time.

But anyway, zombies or vampires or werevolves, at some point, like you say, fantasy has to kick in.  there's only so much they can do.

yeah. I have some issues with the zombie myth (for instance if they eat their prey, where are they all coming from?) but yeah, at some point you have to allow for the fact that...zombies are fantastical creatures.

There can still be zombies because everyone who dies, whether zombie caused or not, becomes a zombie.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josquius on November 10, 2015, 12:35:48 PM
Quote from: Josephus on November 10, 2015, 12:23:40 PM
Quote from: crazy canuck on November 10, 2015, 11:41:11 AM
Quote from: Tyr on November 10, 2015, 11:31:07 AM
I was thinking about the spear thing yesterday too.
When it comes to going out scavenging I'm not so sure which is best but for e.g. zombies at the fence, a spear would be much better

The series has moved off of the original premise which was that even scratch could cause a living person to turn.  Remember back when they used to put on body armour if they were going to engage in close combat with the Walkers.  Once the only risk became being bitten by very slow moving creatures knives became more viable.

Don't forget it's death that causes you to turn, not a scratch, nor a bite. The bite, I imagine, causes infection which causes you to die.

Yes, my original thought  re: cc was: maybe it was after the 'everybody is infected' revelation that they toned down this stuff?
Before they were  treating it is an infectious disease so being very cautious.
Though I'm sure I can remember several major armour incidents at the prison so that's not right.

Certainly though agreed that scratches don't seem to be a big deal these days. Though bites certainly mean instant death for some reason.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on November 10, 2015, 01:18:26 PM
Well body armour would still be a must if going out into the hordes; best way to prevent being bitten, no?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: viper37 on November 10, 2015, 01:31:07 PM
Quote from: Josephus on November 10, 2015, 12:20:47 PM
Quote from: viper37 on November 10, 2015, 09:31:40 AM
Quote from: Tonitrus on November 09, 2015, 08:21:18 PM
Which still doesn't explain overall zombie-rot...
I guess since there is circulatory system, there is nothing to repair tissue damage occuring over time.

But anyway, zombies or vampires or werevolves, at some point, like you say, fantasy has to kick in.  there's only so much they can do.

yeah. I have some issues with the zombie myth (for instance if they eat their prey, where are they all coming from?) but yeah, at some point you have to allow for the fact that...zombies are fantastical creatures.
ah, I thought about that too.
In the Walking Dead universe, initially people get sick, they die, they transform into zombies.  It seems to happen to a small percentage of the population though, if we look at Fear the Walking Dead, maybe 10-20% of the pop, max, or otherwise, some areas maybe worst than others.
Than what happens is people don't know how to react yet, so zombies attack them and bite them, the victim flees to avoid being devoured but end up becoming a zombie.
Then, there are all the people who would die without medical support, something that tends to happen when society collapses.  They turn into zombies, they bite other people.

By the end of the first week, you could easily have 80%+ of the population in a big city transformed into zombies.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: viper37 on November 10, 2015, 01:34:12 PM
Quote from: crazy canuck on November 10, 2015, 12:29:46 PM
That is not how it worked early in the series.  A person did not need to die to be turned.  A scratch would could do it.  But that fell away after, iirc, season 1.  The zombies were too dangerous to tell the story I guess.
Yes, they always needed to die first.  The blond girl that died with the governor had a sister who got bitten by a zombie.  She eventually passed away and near immediatly resurrected as a zombie.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tonitrus on November 16, 2015, 01:02:17 AM
Good episode.

I'm presuming that those other peeps are from Negan's group.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Eddie Teach on November 16, 2015, 02:58:16 AM
Who is Negan?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Siege on November 16, 2015, 09:49:41 AM
I should not have read this thread.....
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Eddie Teach on November 16, 2015, 10:38:02 AM
This episode reinforced the old adage: even during the apocalypse, for every beautiful woman there's a man who's tired of fucking her.  :wacko:
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: crazy canuck on November 16, 2015, 11:58:07 AM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on November 16, 2015, 10:38:02 AM
This episode reinforced the old adage: even during the apocalypse, for every beautiful woman there's a man who's tired of fucking her.  :wacko:

You have some serious issues.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Eddie Teach on November 16, 2015, 12:06:43 PM
True, but not sure what that has to do with my post.  :hmm:
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: KRonn on November 16, 2015, 01:24:13 PM
Interesting episode. It introduced a new group of nasty people, but unlike the nihilist wolves this group is well armed and being as dangerous still has that aspect in common with the wolves.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tonitrus on November 16, 2015, 01:56:57 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on November 16, 2015, 02:58:16 AM
Who is Negan?

I believe the actor has already been cast (Jeffrey Dean Morgan), so his presence on the show should be inevitable...[spoiler]...but he is the next expected major baddie from the comics. (and would fit with the show/comic timeline for him to appear soon) [/spoiler]

Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Admiral Yi on November 16, 2015, 01:57:53 PM
More importantly, what are his Negan super powers?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Eddie Teach on November 16, 2015, 02:13:15 PM
Seriously though, CC, boggles the mind someone would step out on http://i95rocks.com/files/2014/02/christian-serratos-peta.jpg (http://i95rocks.com/files/2014/02/christian-serratos-peta.jpg) (pic linked cause of nudity). Especially a burly, hairy ginger.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tonitrus on November 16, 2015, 02:19:59 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on November 16, 2015, 02:13:15 PM
Seriously though, CC, boggles the mind someone would step out on http://i95rocks.com/files/2014/02/christian-serratos-peta.jpg (http://i95rocks.com/files/2014/02/christian-serratos-peta.jpg) (pic linked cause of nudity). Especially a burly, hairy ginger.

Oh, I'd have to agree...Serratos is definitely a HOTTie...but I don't think it has implied that their relationship was much more than just physical (unless I forgot some details somewhere). 

But naturally, there will inevitably be some drama from it.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: citizen k on November 16, 2015, 03:05:06 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on November 16, 2015, 02:13:15 PM
Especially a burly, hairy ginger.

He's supposed to be an American and so are you, so there's no need to call him "ginger". He's a redhead.  :contract:



Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Eddie Teach on November 16, 2015, 03:08:27 PM
 :blush:

Brits just use the term so much more often than we do.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on November 16, 2015, 06:07:48 PM
I found myself snoozing through a lot of that dialogue...why was it implied they stopped fucking? Or  more seriously, were they fucking? We saw them do it once, but I never took them for an item.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: crazy canuck on November 16, 2015, 06:23:17 PM
Quote from: Josephus on November 16, 2015, 06:07:48 PM
I found myself snoozing through a lot of that dialogue...why was it implied they stopped fucking? Or  more seriously, were they fucking? We saw them do it once, but I never took them for an item.

There were some short scenes with her being concerned about him not returning iirc. 

I thought last show was all about him going through some kind of existential crisis and wanting to just stay put but he got over that.  It wasn't about him deciding that he wanted one woman over another.  More like a "love the one you're with" vibe.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tonitrus on November 16, 2015, 06:43:09 PM
Quote from: crazy canuck on November 16, 2015, 06:23:17 PM
Quote from: Josephus on November 16, 2015, 06:07:48 PM
I found myself snoozing through a lot of that dialogue...why was it implied they stopped fucking? Or  more seriously, were they fucking? We saw them do it once, but I never took them for an item.

There were some short scenes with her being concerned about him not returning iirc. 

I thought last show was all about him going through some kind of existential crisis and wanting to just stay put but he got over that.  It wasn't about him deciding that he wanted one woman over another.  More like a "love the one you're with" vibe.

Well, it does create a build up for a plot point from the comics...[spoiler]where Ford has an affair with another women (who apparently is already dead in the TV series...one of the Alexandrians killed a couple episodes ago) that leads to him and Rosita breaking up...so I am guessing they're just going to be trading out the no-name girl with an already establish character.[/spoiler]
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: viper37 on November 17, 2015, 12:49:42 AM
Quote from: crazy canuck on November 16, 2015, 06:23:17 PM
Quote from: Josephus on November 16, 2015, 06:07:48 PM
I found myself snoozing through a lot of that dialogue...why was it implied they stopped fucking? Or  more seriously, were they fucking? We saw them do it once, but I never took them for an item.

There were some short scenes with her being concerned about him not returning iirc. 

I thought last show was all about him going through some kind of existential crisis and wanting to just stay put but he got over that.  It wasn't about him deciding that he wanted one woman over another.  More like a "love the one you're with" vibe.
I'd say he dies somewhere in the next 2 episodes.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josquius on November 17, 2015, 03:39:56 PM
Well that was a dull episode.
Daryll is going soft?
Soldier guy wants to die?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Grey Fox on November 22, 2015, 10:03:06 PM
Watching this live is a different experience. So many ads, its almost like football.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: lustindarkness on November 22, 2015, 10:34:48 PM
Next week will be action packed awesomeness.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Phillip V on November 22, 2015, 10:59:16 PM
Shane, Jr. gonna get Carl?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tonitrus on November 23, 2015, 01:04:25 AM
Quote from: Phillip V on November 22, 2015, 10:59:16 PM
Shane, Jr. gonna get Carl?

That plot line is a stupid distraction...the show doesn't need stupid teenage jealousy/angst.  Though by around this time, in the comic at least, Carl...[spoiler] is supposed to have one of his eyes shot out...maybe that punk will do it.  Then we'll get eyepatch-Carl for a while.[/spoiler]
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: lustindarkness on November 23, 2015, 02:01:21 PM
Oh, and yesterday I forgot to gloat. I was right! :P

Quote from: lustindarkness on October 26, 2015, 09:48:53 AM
This is fucking bullshit. I dealt with 3 seasons worth of TWD spoilers on the TV/Movie thread. Fuck you all assholes! :mad:


Yes, I'm pissed. Either they killed Glen in a stupid way by a hated character OR he somehow rolled under the trash bin and the walkers had been tearing apart Nick just so that the show can play with my feelings and leave me hanging for two weeks (next week is a 90 minute Morgan flashback episode it seems).

Fuck y'all again. Assholes.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Eddie Teach on November 23, 2015, 02:18:51 PM
You were also wrong. It was four weeks.  :P
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: lustindarkness on November 23, 2015, 02:25:44 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on November 23, 2015, 02:18:51 PM
You were also wrong. It was four weeks.  :P

I know, those assholes.  :mad:
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: KRonn on November 23, 2015, 02:48:40 PM
The Glenn escaping story line could have been done better. What they did mostly works for me as I like Glen (and all of Rick's group) but it was a bit over the top writing. First it showed him falling with his head away from the dumpster, and so many walkers that you'd have to think he'd get bitten even with Nicholas on top of him. They needed to have something else to make it more believable, not sure what. Maybe something else on the ground blocking at leat some of the walkers on one side from getting at him while he slid away.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on November 23, 2015, 03:00:48 PM
I think most of us figured that he'd be able to get away while they chopped up Nick. But I agree it was a bit unbelievable. Too many of them to really get away unscathed.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: crazy canuck on November 23, 2015, 03:10:02 PM
One part I liked is when he found the open window off the alley and he paused and gave his head a shake. 
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josquius on November 23, 2015, 05:10:15 PM
Ok. What the hell happened with Glenn.  I've watched it a bunch of times and...how did he get away there?  Surely he was pinned by all those bodies. ...
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: crazy canuck on November 23, 2015, 06:47:23 PM
Quote from: Tyr on November 23, 2015, 05:10:15 PM
Ok. What the hell happened with Glenn.  I've watched it a bunch of times and...how did he get away there?  Surely he was pinned by all those bodies. ...

There was only one body on top of him.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Siege on November 23, 2015, 08:23:01 PM
Wortless crap.
That chinese guy survived.
Now he is going back to effing the hot jewish girl.
At least he didn't touch the super hottie with the JSS (jewish sex sucks) thing.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Siege on November 23, 2015, 08:31:01 PM
I can't believe Rick doesn't see a threat in the wife beater kid. I can see that trouble coming from a mile away.
Right now the bigestest threats to Rick's Raiders are:
1- Morgan and his refusal to kill and hiding that asshole in the basement. Major ideological difference with Rick. This will only end bad. After someone has died.
2- Wife beater kid. The son of the asshole you kill will always try to kill yours.
3- General stupidity. Someone is going to do something stupid. You can't fix stupid.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Siege on November 23, 2015, 08:43:11 PM
(https://racheltsoumbakos.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/twd-dd-meme-4.jpg)
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Eddie Teach on November 23, 2015, 09:07:04 PM
Quote from: Siege on November 23, 2015, 08:23:01 PM
Wortless crap.
That chinese guy survived.
Now he is going back to effing the hot jewish girl.
At least he didn't touch the super hottie with the JSS (jewish sex sucks) thing.

Korean guy effing a Southern white girl(not a British Jew, this is called acting).
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on November 23, 2015, 09:12:55 PM
Quote from: Siege on November 23, 2015, 08:23:01 PM
Wortless crap.
That chinese guy survived.
Now he is going back to effing the hot jewish girl.
At least he didn't touch the super hottie with the JSS (jewish sex sucks) thing.

Super hottie? She's like 15
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: katmai on November 23, 2015, 09:14:23 PM
Quote from: Josephus on November 23, 2015, 09:12:55 PM
Quote from: Siege on November 23, 2015, 08:23:01 PM
Wortless crap.
That chinese guy survived.
Now he is going back to effing the hot jewish girl.
At least he didn't touch the super hottie with the JSS (jewish sex sucks) thing.

Super hottie? She's like 15
Clearly you have forgotten who you are talking to, Siegy ain't interested if above legal age.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Grey Fox on November 23, 2015, 10:24:13 PM
Jewish Sex Sucks is pretty funny, actually.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josquius on November 24, 2015, 04:00:56 AM
Quote from: crazy canuck on November 23, 2015, 06:47:23 PM
Quote from: Tyr on November 23, 2015, 05:10:15 PM
Ok. What the hell happened with Glenn.  I've watched it a bunch of times and...how did he get away there?  Surely he was pinned by all those bodies. ...

There was only one body on top of him.
And the zombies.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on November 24, 2015, 12:22:00 PM
Quote from: katmai on November 23, 2015, 09:14:23 PM
Quote from: Josephus on November 23, 2015, 09:12:55 PM
Quote from: Siege on November 23, 2015, 08:23:01 PM
Wortless crap.
That chinese guy survived.
Now he is going back to effing the hot jewish girl.
At least he didn't touch the super hottie with the JSS (jewish sex sucks) thing.

Super hottie? She's like 15
Clearly you have forgotten who you are talking to, Siegy ain't interested if above legal age.

Right. Yeah. Forgot.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: crazy canuck on November 24, 2015, 02:47:01 PM
Quote from: Tyr on November 24, 2015, 04:00:56 AM
Quote from: crazy canuck on November 23, 2015, 06:47:23 PM
Quote from: Tyr on November 23, 2015, 05:10:15 PM
Ok. What the hell happened with Glenn.  I've watched it a bunch of times and...how did he get away there?  Surely he was pinned by all those bodies. ...

There was only one body on top of him.
And the zombies.

I didn't see any zombies on top of him.  They were all tearing at the body that was on top of him.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tonitrus on November 30, 2015, 02:12:35 AM
I thought that for a mid-season finale, it was kinda weak.   :sleep:
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Eddie Teach on November 30, 2015, 02:23:20 AM
Probably a mistake not splitting off the season at the tower falling over, they couldn't up the ante any more, nor could they resolve that in one episode.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Jaron on November 30, 2015, 02:44:31 AM
Which super hottie is Siege referring to? Beth?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tonitrus on November 30, 2015, 02:53:17 AM
Quote from: Jaron on November 30, 2015, 02:44:31 AM
Which super hottie is Siege referring to? Beth?

Enid.  The teenage girl that Carl has the hots for.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Eddie Teach on November 30, 2015, 02:56:14 AM
I suspect he had the hots for Beth before that.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Jaron on November 30, 2015, 02:56:28 AM
:lol: Classic Siege.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tonitrus on November 30, 2015, 02:57:35 AM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on November 30, 2015, 02:56:14 AM
I suspect he had the hots for Beth before that.

Impossibru...she was way legal.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Eddie Teach on November 30, 2015, 02:59:07 AM
Carl, that is.  :sleep:
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Jaron on November 30, 2015, 03:00:30 AM
Yeah, the actress who played Beth is 30 now, but she was supposed to be in her mid/late teen years, right?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tonitrus on November 30, 2015, 03:01:04 AM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on November 30, 2015, 02:59:07 AM
Carl, that is.  :sleep:

I'm still probably right.  :P
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Eddie Teach on November 30, 2015, 03:04:33 AM
Quote from: Jaron on November 30, 2015, 03:00:30 AM
Yeah, the actress who played Beth is 30 now, but she was supposed to be in her mid/late teen years, right?

Yeah. There was one scene where she was determined to have her first drink.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: lustindarkness on November 30, 2015, 07:43:42 AM
Quote from: Tonitrus on November 30, 2015, 02:12:35 AM
I thought that for a mid-season finale, it was kinda weak.   :sleep:
Maybe not weak, but it felt short, rushed, and like always too many damn comercial breaks.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Grey Fox on November 30, 2015, 08:43:37 AM
Quote from: lustindarkness on November 30, 2015, 07:43:42 AM
Quote from: Tonitrus on November 30, 2015, 02:12:35 AM
I thought that for a mid-season finale, it was kinda weak.   :sleep:
Maybe not weak, but it felt short, rushed, and like always too many damn comercial breaks.

AMC sure does seem to have lots of those. I watched almost all the episodes (save the last 2, actually) on demand & the live pacing is so different.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: crazy canuck on November 30, 2015, 11:34:46 AM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on November 30, 2015, 02:23:20 AM
Probably a mistake not splitting off the season at the tower falling over, they couldn't up the ante any more, nor could they resolve that in one episode.

I agree.  One thing I was wondering about regarding casting.  The walkers have been around for about two years or more.  The town had food but was rationing and now there are two overweight people in the main cast - the fraudulent egg head and the pseudo doctor.  Are they overweight in the comics as well?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on November 30, 2015, 01:25:52 PM
I always watch TWD about a half hour late, that way I skip all the commercials.

Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: crazy canuck on November 30, 2015, 01:50:09 PM
Quote from: Josephus on November 30, 2015, 01:25:52 PM
I always watch TWD about a half hour late, that way I skip all the commercials.

I start watching at about half past the hour to do the same thing.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: viper37 on November 30, 2015, 02:59:10 PM
Quote from: crazy canuck on November 30, 2015, 11:34:46 AM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on November 30, 2015, 02:23:20 AM
Probably a mistake not splitting off the season at the tower falling over, they couldn't up the ante any more, nor could they resolve that in one episode.

I agree.  One thing I was wondering about regarding casting.  The walkers have been around for about two years or more.  The town had food but was rationing and now there are two overweight people in the main cast - the fraudulent egg head and the pseudo doctor.  Are they overweight in the comics as well?
the guy on Lost never became skinny ;)
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: crazy canuck on November 30, 2015, 04:28:56 PM
Quote from: viper37 on November 30, 2015, 02:59:10 PM
Quote from: crazy canuck on November 30, 2015, 11:34:46 AM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on November 30, 2015, 02:23:20 AM
Probably a mistake not splitting off the season at the tower falling over, they couldn't up the ante any more, nor could they resolve that in one episode.

I agree.  One thing I was wondering about regarding casting.  The walkers have been around for about two years or more.  The town had food but was rationing and now there are two overweight people in the main cast - the fraudulent egg head and the pseudo doctor.  Are they overweight in the comics as well?
the guy on Lost never became skinny ;)

Yeah, but at least it was understandable that he started out being fat.  Hard to explain that this far into the apocalypse.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josquius on December 01, 2015, 02:30:52 AM
I'm kind of relieved they didn't end the series on a cliff hanger. Does look like they were set for the sheltered kid saying mom to turn the zombies on them followed by fade to black.
I have to find issue with their plan here. Taking the kids with them too?  Wouldn't it be better for some of the fit people only to leave and draw the attention of the zombies away from that house? 
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Eddie Teach on December 01, 2015, 02:54:57 AM
Quote from: Tyr on December 01, 2015, 02:30:52 AM
I'm kind of relieved they didn't end the series on a cliff hanger. Does look like they were set for the sheltered kid saying mom to turn the zombies on them followed by fade to black.
I have to find issue with their plan here. Taking the kids with them too?  Wouldn't it be better for some of the fit people only to leave and draw the attention of the zombies away from that house?

They wouldn't have been able to draw all the zombies away, so there'd be fewer defenders in an unsecured house.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: viper37 on December 01, 2015, 09:35:40 AM
Quote from: crazy canuck on November 30, 2015, 04:28:56 PM
Quote from: viper37 on November 30, 2015, 02:59:10 PM
Quote from: crazy canuck on November 30, 2015, 11:34:46 AM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on November 30, 2015, 02:23:20 AM
Probably a mistake not splitting off the season at the tower falling over, they couldn't up the ante any more, nor could they resolve that in one episode.

I agree.  One thing I was wondering about regarding casting.  The walkers have been around for about two years or more.  The town had food but was rationing and now there are two overweight people in the main cast - the fraudulent egg head and the pseudo doctor.  Are they overweight in the comics as well?
the guy on Lost never became skinny ;)

Yeah, but at least it was understandable that he started out being fat.  Hard to explain that this far into the apocalypse.
none of the characters have lost weight, so it's not significant.  I'm pretty sure the lesbian cop gained some weight too.

Living in a city like that, with walls and gates, it's probably the best way to gain some weight.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: katmai on December 01, 2015, 09:40:29 AM
Quote from: viper37 on December 01, 2015, 09:35:40 AM

  I'm pretty sure the lesbian cop gained some weight too.

Only because actress was pregnant me thinks :P
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Siege on December 01, 2015, 09:41:13 AM
Oh come on. You gonna tell me you don't find Enid super hott? You guys are full of shit. Or afraid to say what you really think. Cant wait for the tecjnological singularity so we all look 25.

About the ending, i was seriously considering taping that kids mouth before walking out. I knew he was gonna freak out.

Rick got a big problem. Both kids from the blonde chick he is persuing are worthless and a threat to his kids. He will have to choose eventually.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: katmai on December 01, 2015, 09:44:22 AM
Quote from: Siege on December 01, 2015, 09:41:13 AM
Oh come on. You gonna tell me you don't find Enid super hott? You guys are full of shit.

No you horny hebe.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: viper37 on December 01, 2015, 09:47:05 AM
Quote from: katmai on December 01, 2015, 09:40:29 AM
Quote from: viper37 on December 01, 2015, 09:35:40 AM

  I'm pretty sure the lesbian cop gained some weight too.

Only because actress was pregnant me thinks :P
that's possible.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Siege on December 01, 2015, 09:47:15 AM
By the way, did you guys notice Maggie's jeans when she was climbing away from the walkers?

I hope Glenn gets eaten by a jewish zombie.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Siege on December 01, 2015, 09:49:06 AM
Quote from: katmai on December 01, 2015, 09:44:22 AM
Quote from: Siege on December 01, 2015, 09:41:13 AM
Oh come on. You gonna tell me you don't find Enid super hott? You guys are full of shit.

No you horny hebe.
I aint horny.
I just a man.
Do you ever stop being a man?
Do you stop noticing hott girls?
No wonder the West is doomed.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: katmai on December 01, 2015, 09:50:22 AM
Quote from: viper37 on December 01, 2015, 09:47:05 AM
Quote from: katmai on December 01, 2015, 09:40:29 AM
Quote from: viper37 on December 01, 2015, 09:35:40 AM

  I'm pretty sure the lesbian cop gained some weight too.

Only because actress was pregnant me thinks :P
that's possible.
Sorry i meant i know she was pregnant.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Siege on December 01, 2015, 09:59:57 AM
Do you guys think Enid was a wolf?
I think there is more to her story, pre Alexandria safe zone, that we haven't seen yet.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Grey Fox on December 01, 2015, 10:06:18 AM
I think Enid is inconsequential and I am not turned on by actresses that look like 15 years old.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: katmai on December 01, 2015, 10:10:31 AM
Quote from: Grey Fox on December 01, 2015, 10:06:18 AM
I think Enid is inconsequential and I am not turned on by actresses that look like 15 years old.
Cause she is 16.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josquius on December 01, 2015, 10:22:51 AM
Quote from: Siege on December 01, 2015, 09:41:13 AM
Oh come on. You gonna tell me you don't find Enid super hott? You guys are full of shit. Or afraid to say what you really think. Cant wait for the tecjnological singularity so we all look 25.

About the ending, i was seriously considering taping that kids mouth before walking out. I knew he was gonna freak out.

Rick got a big problem. Both kids from the blonde chick he is persuing are worthless and a threat to his kids. He will have to choose eventually.

Even trying to put aside my disgust for paedophilia a d trying to analyse her levelly; no.

I mean seriously. Having a weird thing for one kid....sure. ok.  But its every single under age girl you see on TV.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: crazy canuck on December 01, 2015, 11:04:53 AM
Quote from: Tyr on December 01, 2015, 02:30:52 AM
I'm kind of relieved they didn't end the series on a cliff hanger. Does look like they were set for the sheltered kid saying mom to turn the zombies on them followed by fade to black.
I have to find issue with their plan here. Taking the kids with them too?  Wouldn't it be better for some of the fit people only to leave and draw the attention of the zombies away from that house?

Yeah, I didn't understand why they all had to leave.  The only danger was running out of food and water.  Something that could be solved if Rick took a small group to draw the herd away.  That after all was the plan that started this season off.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Grey Fox on December 01, 2015, 11:13:02 AM
Quote from: katmai on December 01, 2015, 10:10:31 AM
Quote from: Grey Fox on December 01, 2015, 10:06:18 AM
I think Enid is inconsequential and I am not turned on by actresses that look like 15 years old.
Cause she is 16.

Excellent.

I am not turned on by 16 years old persons.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Siege on December 01, 2015, 11:16:01 AM
Carol vs Arya stark.
Who winns?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: KRonn on December 01, 2015, 11:25:49 AM
They seriously needed to speak to that young kid to make sure he doesn't do anything stupid.  I can see why they all left but it's seriously unnerving for those "rookies" to walk through an army of walkers.

I kept waiting for Glenn and Enid to get to a car and make some noise outside the walls to draw the walkers off.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Eddie Teach on December 01, 2015, 12:16:22 PM
Quote from: Siege on December 01, 2015, 09:41:13 AM
Oh come on. You gonna tell me you don't find Enid super hott? You guys are full of shit. Or afraid to say what you really think. Cant wait for the tecjnological singularity so we all look 25.

She ain't got shit on Rosita or Beth.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Siege on December 01, 2015, 12:55:58 PM
Beth, maybe. Close call.
Rosita, who's that?
If i don't know who that is, she ain't got my attention, so she ain't hot.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Grey Fox on December 01, 2015, 01:47:38 PM
Really? I thought Rosita was pretty much how you think women should look.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Eddie Teach on December 01, 2015, 02:08:20 PM
Army fatigues aren't kosher.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on December 01, 2015, 09:55:38 PM
Quote from: Siege on December 01, 2015, 09:47:15 AM
By the way, did you guys notice Maggie's jeans when she was climbing away from the walkers?


Could a been a stunt guy's jeans you were looking at.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on December 01, 2015, 09:57:36 PM
Quote from: crazy canuck on December 01, 2015, 11:04:53 AM
Quote from: Tyr on December 01, 2015, 02:30:52 AM
I'm kind of relieved they didn't end the series on a cliff hanger. Does look like they were set for the sheltered kid saying mom to turn the zombies on them followed by fade to black.
I have to find issue with their plan here. Taking the kids with them too?  Wouldn't it be better for some of the fit people only to leave and draw the attention of the zombies away from that house?

Yeah, I didn't understand why they all had to leave.  The only danger was running out of food and water.  Something that could be solved if Rick took a small group to draw the herd away.  That after all was the plan that started this season off.

Not sure. Herd was in the house. Would take them a while to formulate a plan to draw that many away. I think the house wasn't safe anymore.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Siege on December 02, 2015, 09:11:23 AM
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hollywoodtake.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fstyles%2Flarge%2Fpublic%2F2015%2F10%2F16%2Fwalking-dead-jss-predictions.jpg%3Fitok%3DxpWCaSJT&hash=d494795cee4a135476b082b673556e6c43db6fcd)
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Siege on December 02, 2015, 09:16:02 AM
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fia.media-imdb.com%2Fimages%2FM%2FMV5BNDk4NzI1OTIzNl5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwOTMwMzg3NTE%40._V1_UY1200_CR85%2C0%2C630%2C1200_AL_.jpg&hash=81c8bced649b09bcc7b52e27dd80f6fe20f2738a)
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Valmy on December 02, 2015, 10:18:51 AM
Quote from: Grey Fox on December 01, 2015, 01:47:38 PM
Really? I thought Rosita was pretty much how you think women should look.

Too old, too fat.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: viper37 on December 02, 2015, 11:47:42 AM
Quote from: crazy canuck on December 01, 2015, 11:04:53 AM
Quote from: Tyr on December 01, 2015, 02:30:52 AM
I'm kind of relieved they didn't end the series on a cliff hanger. Does look like they were set for the sheltered kid saying mom to turn the zombies on them followed by fade to black.
I have to find issue with their plan here. Taking the kids with them too?  Wouldn't it be better for some of the fit people only to leave and draw the attention of the zombies away from that house?

Yeah, I didn't understand why they all had to leave.  The only danger was running out of food and water.  Something that could be solved if Rick took a small group to draw the herd away.  That after all was the plan that started this season off.

they can't stay, they are overrun by zombies inside the house, thanks to the stupid teenage kid that tried to kill Carl.  It's only a matter of time before they can climb the stairs, and even if they couldn't, there is no food and no water over there.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: viper37 on December 02, 2015, 11:49:16 AM
Quote from: Siege on December 02, 2015, 09:11:23 AM
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hollywoodtake.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fstyles%2Flarge%2Fpublic%2F2015%2F10%2F16%2Fwalking-dead-jss-predictions.jpg%3Fitok%3DxpWCaSJT&hash=d494795cee4a135476b082b673556e6c43db6fcd)

see, that is a very hott woman.

The other one might be pretty 10 years down the road.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: lustindarkness on February 14, 2016, 09:09:03 PM
Mid season premiere explosive start.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: lustindarkness on February 14, 2016, 10:08:06 PM
Quote from: lustindarkness on February 14, 2016, 09:09:03 PM
Mid season premiere explosive start.
Best episode in a while.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Eddie Teach on February 15, 2016, 12:13:10 AM
Quote from: lustindarkness on February 14, 2016, 09:09:03 PM
Mid season premiere explosive start.

I loved that. "Nah, we ARE gonna kill you." /bikers all disappear in explosion
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Grey Fox on February 15, 2016, 08:44:41 AM
I was pleasently surprised that Gimple & crew didn't whimper on the Bazooka. :thumbsup:

I am sad to see New chick family go all at once.

Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on February 15, 2016, 10:04:09 AM
So did we always know zombies are drawn to fire. And if so, isnt' the war over now? Every time there's a horde, light a fire?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Grey Fox on February 15, 2016, 10:17:42 AM
We knew. It's in, iirc, season 2.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: viper37 on February 15, 2016, 01:56:13 PM
Quote from: Josephus on February 15, 2016, 10:04:09 AM
So did we always know zombies are drawn to fire.
is it the fire or the noise the fire makes?

Quote
And if so, isnt' the war over now? Every time there's a horde, light a fire?
Well, the thing with fire is, it's pretty hard to control.  You light it, you try to create a path to were you want it to go, but then the wind comes and the fire shifts.  Or there's rain and it stops and you have a horde of zombies attracted to it nearby.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josquius on February 15, 2016, 03:30:28 PM
Walking Dead writers meetings typically go something like this: "So what do we do about plot thread x that we've started?" "......no idea. Lets just kill the guys involved."
Thus the kids were removed.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Norgy on February 15, 2016, 03:32:23 PM
I imagined it's the noise the walkers are drawn to.
I also think it seems like a poor idea to have a biker gang in the apocalypse due to fuel shortages.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: katmai on February 15, 2016, 03:52:11 PM
Quote from: Tyr on February 15, 2016, 03:30:28 PM
Walking Dead writers meetings typically go something like this: "So what do we do about plot thread x that we've started?" "......no idea. Lets just kill the guys involved."
Thus the kids were removed.
Um no.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Crazy_Ivan80 on February 15, 2016, 04:27:42 PM
Quote from: Norgy on February 15, 2016, 03:32:23 PM
I imagined it's the noise the walkers are drawn to.
I also think it seems like a poor idea to have a biker gang in the apocalypse due to fuel shortages.

maybe they mean a bicyclegang, but are too ashamed to admit it?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Norgy on February 15, 2016, 04:39:45 PM
There's no need to put down the Dutch just for the sake of it, CI.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on February 15, 2016, 10:38:27 PM
Quote from: Crazy_Ivan80 on February 15, 2016, 04:27:42 PM
Quote from: Norgy on February 15, 2016, 03:32:23 PM
I imagined it's the noise the walkers are drawn to.
I also think it seems like a poor idea to have a biker gang in the apocalypse due to fuel shortages.

maybe they mean a bicyclegang, but are too ashamed to admit it?

They had bicyclegang in the script. But then one of the assistants wrote down "bike gang" on a restaurant napkin, and that's what happened.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tonitrus on February 16, 2016, 03:28:39 AM
Quote from: katmai on February 15, 2016, 03:52:11 PM
Quote from: Tyr on February 15, 2016, 03:30:28 PM
Walking Dead writers meetings typically go something like this: "So what do we do about plot thread x that we've started?" "......no idea. Lets just kill the guys involved."
Thus the kids were removed.
Um no.

Indeed.  New girl and kids go down in a similar way in the comics.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Eddie Teach on February 16, 2016, 03:38:17 AM
So, comic writers have meeting, things go down like Tyr said?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Jaron on February 16, 2016, 03:50:29 AM
is Carl dead as a MRF
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josquius on February 16, 2016, 05:15:35 AM
Quote from: katmai on February 15, 2016, 03:52:11 PM
Quote from: Tyr on February 15, 2016, 03:30:28 PM
Walking Dead writers meetings typically go something like this: "So what do we do about plot thread x that we've started?" "......no idea. Lets just kill the guys involved."
Thus the kids were removed.
Um no.
It was a big anti climax for the "you killed my dad!" Plot line.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Eddie Teach on February 16, 2016, 05:26:38 AM
Quote from: Jaron on February 16, 2016, 03:50:29 AM
is Carl dead as a MRF

He's as dead as Ralphie at the end of A Christmas Story.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: katmai on February 16, 2016, 05:47:13 AM
Quote from: Jaron on February 16, 2016, 03:50:29 AM
is Carl dead as a MRF
Um no.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tonitrus on February 16, 2016, 06:52:27 AM
Quote from: Jaron on February 16, 2016, 03:50:29 AM
is Carl dead as a MRF

One-eyed Carl is also from the comic
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: lustindarkness on February 16, 2016, 09:44:00 AM
I wonder if the RPG impacting surface water on the pond would really detonate? :unsure: Maybe we can test this, anyone have a pool we can test this in? Oh yeah, and an RPG launcher?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Norgy on February 16, 2016, 10:56:20 AM
Well, you guys are the ones that get RPGs handed out with your Happy Meals (supposedly), so I suggest you do it. Mono probably has a pool he hasn't told us about.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: citizen k on February 18, 2016, 12:26:41 AM
"Richonne" will become a reality next week.  :secret:


Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Norgy on February 18, 2016, 06:13:48 AM
Apparently, Telltale Games will release a Michonne game now in spring too.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Eddie Teach on February 18, 2016, 06:51:01 AM
Quote from: citizen k on February 18, 2016, 12:26:41 AM
"Richonne"

I hope we'll get rid of those stupid couple portmanteaus come the apocalypse.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: crazy canuck on February 21, 2016, 10:17:12 PM
Quote from: Tyr on February 16, 2016, 05:15:35 AM
Quote from: katmai on February 15, 2016, 03:52:11 PM
Quote from: Tyr on February 15, 2016, 03:30:28 PM
Walking Dead writers meetings typically go something like this: "So what do we do about plot thread x that we've started?" "......no idea. Lets just kill the guys involved."
Thus the kids were removed.
Um no.
It was a big anti climax for the "you killed my dad!" Plot line.

:huh:

What was anti-climactic about that?

Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: lustindarkness on February 21, 2016, 10:43:03 PM
Another great episode, a lot more light hearted.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: crazy canuck on February 21, 2016, 11:58:25 PM
Quote from: lustindarkness on February 21, 2016, 10:43:03 PM
Another great episode, a lot more light hearted.

Agreed.  That was very good.

How did Jesus get on the roof so quickly?  Law of averages?  :D
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Phillip V on February 22, 2016, 02:14:10 AM
The show is great for mixed race relationships.  Bring on the interracial babies. :w00t:
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Eddie Teach on February 22, 2016, 06:13:10 AM
Quote from: crazy canuck on February 21, 2016, 11:58:25 PM
How did Jesus get on the roof so quickly?  Law of averages?  :D

Law of Murphy.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tonitrus on February 22, 2016, 12:40:29 PM
Quote from: crazy canuck on February 21, 2016, 11:58:25 PM
Quote from: lustindarkness on February 21, 2016, 10:43:03 PM
Another great episode, a lot more light hearted.

Agreed.  That was very good.

How did Jesus get on the roof so quickly?  Law of averages?  :D

Helped by, from what I am seeing so far (watching in progress)...Rick and Daryl being total fucking idiots.  :P
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josquius on February 22, 2016, 03:10:11 PM
I liked this episode.
Always good when things happen in daylight and you can see what is going on.
But stupid people- :(
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: lustindarkness on March 07, 2016, 09:30:37 AM
Pretty crazy episode last night. Next two will end the season with a bang.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Grey Fox on March 07, 2016, 10:48:56 AM
4 to go!
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tonitrus on March 07, 2016, 09:33:36 PM
Dang this thread...and the local cable company.

Not sure if I should pony up for the Amazon Prime same-day, or cheapskate out and wait for the episodes to slowly filter out to no-login required AMC.com availability (which is like 2-3 weeks behind).  <_<
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: katmai on March 07, 2016, 09:37:19 PM
I went and got Sling app for $20 a month as gives me AMC/IFC/Viceland and el rey network.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tonitrus on March 07, 2016, 09:41:33 PM
Quote from: katmai on March 07, 2016, 09:37:19 PM
I went and got Sling app for $20 a month as gives me AMC/IFC/Viceland and el rey network.

Holy crap, it has TCM*...I might have to cut the GCI cord (though I'd still need to pay for their internet  :P ).


*Though I'd have to figure out how to DVR the movies somehow.  :sleep:



Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tonitrus on March 07, 2016, 09:45:57 PM
Quote from: Tonitrus on March 07, 2016, 09:41:33 PM
Quote from: katmai on March 07, 2016, 09:37:19 PM
I went and got Sling app for $20 a month as gives me AMC/IFC/Viceland and el rey network.

Holy crap, it has TCM*...I might have to cut the GCI cord (though I'd still need to pay for their internet  :P ).


*Though I'd have to figure out how to DVR the movies somehow.  :sleep:

From what I can find...you have to watch AMC live, which I can rarely do with my work schedule.  :mad:
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Eddie Teach on March 07, 2016, 09:57:54 PM
You get to see WD and BCS though?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tonitrus on March 07, 2016, 10:15:26 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on March 07, 2016, 09:57:54 PM
You get to see WD and BCS though?

Not if I am not at home when it's broadcast I won't.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: katmai on March 07, 2016, 11:02:14 PM
Quote from: Tonitrus on March 07, 2016, 09:45:57 PM


From what I can find...you have to watch AMC live, which I can rarely do with my work schedule.  :mad:
Not sure what your schedule is but yes AMC is live only, but like last night Walking dead was on at 5pm for first airing (sling seems to be on EST) and then rebroadcast at 8:30 and 9:30pm
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Grey Fox on March 08, 2016, 06:09:43 AM
I shelled out the 4$ required for AMC back in September after years of torrents. Gotta say, live broadcast is stressfull.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Eddie Teach on March 08, 2016, 06:46:45 AM
Quote from: Tonitrus on March 07, 2016, 10:15:26 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on March 07, 2016, 09:57:54 PM
You get to see WD and BCS though?

Not if I am not at home when it's broadcast I won't.

But do you get to see them on AMC's website?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on March 08, 2016, 09:29:32 AM
I know they made a big deal about it being dark and all.....but still, their plan rested on finding a zombie whose face resembled Gregory's (or whatever his name is). Bit of a stretch.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josquius on March 08, 2016, 10:24:19 AM
Well that was pretty cool.

Would the guards have known what the guy looks like? It strikes me those goons probably wouldn't.

Probable spoiler for future episodes:
[spoiler]had something ruined for me..... reedus I'd leaving the show. Hence daryl is going to die :([/spoiler]
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Grey Fox on March 08, 2016, 11:06:37 AM
I don't think so.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on March 08, 2016, 11:45:49 AM
If they didn't know what he looked like, why go through the pains of breaking his nose.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: crazy canuck on March 08, 2016, 12:43:29 PM
Quote from: Josephus on March 08, 2016, 11:45:49 AM
If they didn't know what he looked like, why go through the pains of breaking his nose.

He negotiated the "deal" with them so at least some of them knew what he looked like.  But the guards probably didn't have a good idea so Rick's group only needed a rough approximation.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josquius on March 09, 2016, 03:41:47 AM
Quote from: Josephus on March 08, 2016, 11:45:49 AM
If they didn't know what he looked like, why go through the pains of breaking his nose.
They didn't know who would be on guard duty. Might have been a guy who had seen him up close and has a good memory.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: lustindarkness on March 14, 2016, 11:39:35 AM
Carol and Maggie :thumbsup:
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on March 14, 2016, 02:05:22 PM
Quote from: lustindarkness on March 14, 2016, 11:39:35 AM
Carol and Maggie :thumbsup:

Probably one of my top 5 Walking Dead episodes.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josquius on March 15, 2016, 03:28:43 AM
So. There go the odd we are all neegan people.
Or probably not as I've heard spoilers that suggests they're a big enemy.
Wonder what they have to so with the W people.

At first I thought carol was putting on her weak act so they'd drop their guard but....it seems she did go soft somehow?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on March 15, 2016, 08:08:41 AM
I don't think Negan is related to Wolves. I don't think we've seen the last of Negan, becuase it's no secret they cast someone as Negan and we haven't seen him yet.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Solmyr on March 15, 2016, 11:32:39 AM
People are betting on Glenn, Carol, and/or Daryl dying this season.

Edit: And Abraham.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josquius on March 15, 2016, 11:34:19 AM
Daryls actor is leaving so.....
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Phillip V on March 15, 2016, 11:44:09 AM
Quote from: Tyr on March 15, 2016, 11:34:19 AM
Daryls actor is leaving so.....
Source?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: lustindarkness on March 15, 2016, 01:12:13 PM
Quote from: Solmyr on March 15, 2016, 11:32:39 AM
People are betting on Glenn, Carol, and/or Daryl dying this season.

Edit: And Abraham.


Or maybe all four.  :o :cry:
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Phillip V on March 15, 2016, 01:29:51 PM
Quote from: lustindarkness on March 15, 2016, 01:12:13 PM
Quote from: Solmyr on March 15, 2016, 11:32:39 AM
People are betting on Glenn, Carol, and/or Daryl dying this season.

Edit: And Abraham.


Or maybe all four.  :o :cry:

Big payroll savings if that happens.  AMC needs to return money to shareholders.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Grey Fox on March 16, 2016, 08:55:24 AM
Quote from: Tyr on March 15, 2016, 11:34:19 AM
Daryls actor is leaving so.....

Just because someone thought he was selling his house.

It wasn't his house.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: viper37 on March 16, 2016, 09:47:26 AM
Quote from: Phillip V on March 15, 2016, 01:29:51 PM
Quote from: lustindarkness on March 15, 2016, 01:12:13 PM
Quote from: Solmyr on March 15, 2016, 11:32:39 AM
People are betting on Glenn, Carol, and/or Daryl dying this season.

Edit: And Abraham.


Or maybe all four.  :o :cry:

Big payroll savings if that happens.  AMC needs to return money to shareholders.
drop in ratings too, so, less money for shareholders.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: lustindarkness on March 20, 2016, 09:18:27 PM
Good episode. Looks like the season finale will be heartbreaking (like always).
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on March 21, 2016, 09:28:13 AM
I liked the cute fat girl.  :(
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josquius on March 21, 2016, 03:36:25 PM
Walking Dead- So, an episode where the buffed up lvl 15 warriors take out the lvl 1 mages to try and level them up and make them less useless.
Woops.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tonitrus on March 21, 2016, 04:43:02 PM
Quote from: lustindarkness on March 15, 2016, 01:12:13 PM
Quote from: Solmyr on March 15, 2016, 11:32:39 AM
People are betting on Glenn, Carol, and/or Daryl dying this season.

Edit: And Abraham.


Or maybe all four.  :o :cry:

Well, Glenn is supposed to die (from the comics, anyway) early on in the interactions with the Saviors...but doing the Glenn-death tease mid-season, just to kill him in the finale would be mega-lame.  :P

Being that Daryl is a non-comic character, maybe they'll trade Glenn's death with his? :hmm:
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: citizen k on March 21, 2016, 04:45:39 PM
Quote from: Tonitrus on March 21, 2016, 04:43:02 PM
Quote from: lustindarkness on March 15, 2016, 01:12:13 PM
Quote from: Solmyr on March 15, 2016, 11:32:39 AM
People are betting on Glenn, Carol, and/or Daryl dying this season.

Edit: And Abraham.


Or maybe all four.  :o :cry:

Well, Glenn is supposed to die (from the comics, anyway) early on in the interactions with the Saviors...but doing the Glenn-death tease mid-season, just to kill him in the finale would be mega-lame.  :P

Being that Daryl is a non-comic character, maybe they'll trade Glenn's death with his? :hmm:

My deathwatch:

Daryl
Glenn
Abraham
Carol

Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tonitrus on March 21, 2016, 05:03:59 PM
Quote from: Solmyr on March 15, 2016, 11:32:39 AM
People are betting on Glenn, Carol, and/or Daryl dying this season.

Edit: And Abraham.

Was justing reading the comic wiki, and from that, it seems Abraham in that universe was the one who takes the arrow to the head.

Maybe he will be the one killed instead of Glenn.  It kinda works...start a love interest with Sasha to get the fire kindled, then have him taken out.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: katmai on March 21, 2016, 06:19:59 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on March 08, 2016, 06:46:45 AM
Quote from: Tonitrus on March 07, 2016, 10:15:26 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on March 07, 2016, 09:57:54 PM
You get to see WD and BCS though?

Not if I am not at home when it's broadcast I won't.

But do you get to see them on AMC's website?
Nope
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tonitrus on March 21, 2016, 07:23:07 PM
Quote from: katmai on March 21, 2016, 06:19:59 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on March 08, 2016, 06:46:45 AM
Quote from: Tonitrus on March 07, 2016, 10:15:26 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on March 07, 2016, 09:57:54 PM
You get to see WD and BCS though?

Not if I am not at home when it's broadcast I won't.

But do you get to see them on AMC's website?
Nope

BCS had a couple episodes that don't require login, but TWD is popular enough to not need to do that (to log in and watch, you need to have a cable service that carries AMC anyway).

My alternative has been to prop up Bezos by shelling out the cash to Amazon.  I figure it's not really all that pricey.  It'd make more sense if I dumped my cable TV though.  :P
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: 11B4V on March 21, 2016, 07:32:25 PM
Quote from: Josephus on March 21, 2016, 09:28:13 AM
I liked the cute fat girl.  :(

When that happened my daughter and other jumped out of their seat.  I said well that will leave a mark. :lol:
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Phillip V on March 22, 2016, 07:41:55 AM
Another good, thoughtful episode.  Daryl and Carol's brief 30-second exchange at the beginning ended up being the entire episode (and series?).  Very memorable.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on March 22, 2016, 08:06:12 AM
I'd be shocked if Daryll dies. I know the rumours, but that's probably intentional red herring.

Carol perhaps. She's  a popular character, but if she leaves the group again, then maybe her storyline is over.

My picks:

1. Carol
2. Abraham
3. Glenn
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Phillip V on March 22, 2016, 09:13:43 AM
Quote from: Josephus on March 21, 2016, 09:28:13 AM
I liked the cute fat girl.  :(

When that hit, my first thought was one-eyed Carl for some reason.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on March 22, 2016, 10:14:33 AM
Quote from: Phillip V on March 22, 2016, 09:13:43 AM
Quote from: Josephus on March 21, 2016, 09:28:13 AM
I liked the cute fat girl.  :(

When that hit, my first thought was one-eyed Carl for some reason.

They should give her one good eye to Carl
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josquius on March 22, 2016, 11:45:00 AM
Abraham has been on course for death for a while.
Would be funny if he is the last one standing
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: KRonn on March 26, 2016, 03:23:51 PM
With Carol leaving the colony and the group going out to look for her in what appears will be various small groups, I expect some of them will be hard pressed by roving bands of Neganites searching for them after the attack on that one Negan compound.

Silly Carol. I can understand her having a change of mindset after all the killing and wanting to leave to avoid more killing to defend her friends, but on her own she'll have to kill just to survive. I love her character though.

Anyhow, with a couple of episodes left I expect there will be a cliffhanger at the season finale and I also expect one of the group to be killed. No idea who though.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on March 27, 2016, 09:14:16 PM
Odds on it being Daryll just went up. I think it's definately going to be him or Carol. Glenn still a good bet.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: lustindarkness on March 27, 2016, 09:37:09 PM
I think that was a shoulder shot. Now next week he may not survive the full 90 minutes of the season finale.
Or worst, they show him "possibly" dying and make us wait a few months to find out. <_<
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Grey Fox on March 28, 2016, 06:07:47 AM
Darryl might die, not positive he's Lucille victim tho.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: KRonn on March 28, 2016, 08:24:05 AM
Quote from: lustindarkness on March 27, 2016, 09:37:09 PM
I think that was a shoulder shot. Now next week he may not survive the full 90 minutes of the season finale.
Or worst, they show him "possibly" dying and make us wait a few months to find out. <_<

Yeah, I think it was a wound, as we heard Dwight say something like "it's not that bad". So I'm thinking that Daryl won't be the one killed off in the finale since he's already been hit which is his shock to viewers/fans. I agree that it's possible that we won't find out his fate until the next season.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josquius on March 28, 2016, 03:34:57 PM
So.....that guy who stole darylls bike last series.....
If hes part of the bigger bad guy group . .. Who was it chasing him at the time?

Also not sure I get what's going on with Carol.  She's going crazy? Having doubts about her new found  bad assery?

One immersion  breaker in the series.... I find it bizzare how they continue to find recently killed off groups.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: katmai on March 28, 2016, 03:42:59 PM
Quote from: Tyr on March 28, 2016, 03:34:57 PM
So.....that guy who stole darylls bike last series.....
If hes part of the bigger bad guy group . .. Who was it chasing him at the time?

The saviors aka bigger bad guy group. He was trying to leave them in the episode Daryl met them in the forest.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josquius on March 28, 2016, 03:51:36 PM
Are there two enemy groups?  (3? Saviours, Ws, Neegan)
As he seems to be pretty high ranked with them now, leading that war party.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on March 28, 2016, 04:13:09 PM
I think Saviours are led by Neagan
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: katmai on March 28, 2016, 04:38:14 PM
Quote from: Josephus on March 28, 2016, 04:13:09 PM
I think Saviours are led by Neagan
:yes:
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Phillip V on March 29, 2016, 02:11:50 AM
I want to see a main character die of strep throat or diarrhea.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Siege on March 29, 2016, 07:35:16 PM
Quote from: lustindarkness on February 16, 2016, 09:44:00 AM
I wonder if the RPG impacting surface water on the pond would really detonate? :unsure: Maybe we can test this, anyone have a pool we can test this in? Oh yeah, and an RPG launcher?

No. It doesn't.
Reason is rockets accelerate incrementally. They come out at a slower speed and then pick up, thus not fast enough to detonate on water at the range depicted in the show.

Even worst, the explosion in which the biker gang goes belly up is completely off. There is no way any type of known RPG round can detonate in a surface explosion covering that much area. If it was an HE round it would explode with a kill radius of 10 meters and a fragmentation maximum of 150 meters, which would definitively not do what happened in the show. And an AP round would just make a little hole on the asphalt with the bikers looking at each other.

More importantly, RPG7 rounds do not have proximity fuse, so they would actually have to impact the target to detonate. Due to the target being motorcycles, my money would be on the round just flying between the bikes and going off on the distance.

By the way, when the RPG7 round detonates when shooting at a low flying rotary wing aircraft, it is not a proximity fuse, but the maximum range self detonation fuse, which goes off after 4.5 seconds of flight, between 920 and 1100 meters, depending on the round.

Anyway.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josquius on March 30, 2016, 01:29:40 PM
Quote from: Phillip V on March 29, 2016, 02:11:50 AM
I want to see a main character die of strep throat or diarrhea.

They had the mystery disease in the prison.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Norgy on March 31, 2016, 12:38:08 PM
It's certainly getting more brutal and cold with every season.
To the point where I tend to side with Morgan rather than Rick.

Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Solmyr on April 03, 2016, 02:10:59 PM
The hype is over 9000!
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: lustindarkness on April 03, 2016, 09:37:58 PM
I hate The Walking Dead writers, producers, etc, each and every last one of them.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on April 03, 2016, 09:41:23 PM
Looks like we'll be speculating for a while yet.  :lol:
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Zoupa on April 03, 2016, 11:22:32 PM
I went and read the Walking Dead comic wiki to see who Negan clubs to death, because that was such a cheap gimmick.

It's pretty much all this show has left at this point though.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Norgy on April 04, 2016, 04:19:02 AM
Fuck that ending.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: lustindarkness on April 04, 2016, 06:39:10 AM
I understand that the network likes to generate buzz wroth these cliffhangers,  bit all they generate is hate from the fans.  Such a great scene, a great episodes really, to ruin it in the end? It felt cheap.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Grey Fox on April 04, 2016, 06:58:04 AM
I am done with the Walking dead. I am not angry, I was done 3 episodes ago, I just can't care anymore.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Solmyr on April 04, 2016, 08:24:34 AM
Quote from: Grey Fox on April 04, 2016, 06:58:04 AM
I am done with the Walking dead. I am not angry, I was done 3 episodes ago, I just can't care anymore.

You'll be back next season. :contract:
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on April 04, 2016, 09:52:33 AM
Quote from: Grey Fox on April 04, 2016, 06:58:04 AM
I am done with the Walking dead. I am not angry, I was done 3 episodes ago, I just can't care anymore.

Pourquoi? :huh:
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Grey Fox on April 04, 2016, 10:13:43 AM
Quote from: Josephus on April 04, 2016, 09:52:33 AM
Quote from: Grey Fox on April 04, 2016, 06:58:04 AM
I am done with the Walking dead. I am not angry, I was done 3 episodes ago, I just can't care anymore.

Pourquoi? :huh:

I find it boring, every minute of the show I see is a minute I spend wondering who will die. I am not enjoying it anymore.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on April 04, 2016, 11:16:51 AM
good critique of last night's show here:

http://www.avclub.com/tvclub/walking-dead-season-finale-swings-misses-234745
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josquius on April 04, 2016, 12:13:48 PM
1: Well that's an anti-climax on Daryll being shot. Though I'm relieved to see an outcome- at first it looked like they were going on end the episode on everyone being surrounded, then I noticed we hadn't reached the end yet.

2: In the US hunting shops typically carry night vision goggles right? Just realised I haven't seen a single pair on the show. :hmm:

3: Horse riding neo-knights? That was cool.

4: Typical stupid villains. All that fuss and right when they have our guys they don't kill them all.

5: Dumb cliffhanger.  I wonder if they left it vague who gets beaten just so they can save some money on contract renegotiations. "Play ball or you're it!"
At least they didn't just kill one of the no-name characters; black chick no 2. and the guy from Alexandria.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: crazy canuck on April 04, 2016, 12:19:41 PM
Quote from: Tyr on April 04, 2016, 12:13:48 PM
4: Typical stupid villains. All that fuss and right when they have our guys they don't kill them all.

Yeah, they were making him look like a Dark Age warlord concerned about keeping enough peasants in the field.  But he had the ring leaders of the group that had just killed what he described as too many of his own people.  It was indeed stupid for him to keep any of them alive.

My vote for the guy that gets killed is the guy originally from Alexandria - forget his name.  We didnt really see him this season and for some reason he got in the RV.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Norgy on April 04, 2016, 01:10:32 PM
I agree with cc. It's probably him.

Or Carl.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: lustindarkness on April 04, 2016, 02:01:16 PM
This is what actually happens now: Carl joins forces with Negan and become his pupil. When they meet again Carl kills Rick and throws him off a catwalk.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tonitrus on April 04, 2016, 03:36:54 PM
Agree that not revealing the beat-down victim was lame.

My guess is either:

Daryl: because of the already known actor-selling-his-house-speculation, and that he does not even exist in the comic (so is expendable, even if a fan-loved character)

Abraham: because he was supposed to have died instead of Denise (per the comic).  So unless they decided they liked the character enough the keep, his clock is ticking.  Argument against?  It doesn't feel like they've fully finished the romance angle with him and Sasha yet.

Glenn: The one who is supposed to be dead.

Wild Card: As mentioned above...based on whomever they cannot resign a contract to.  Seriously...the series is reaching the point where in most, actors start shedding away due to boredom/typecast fears/money.  TWD is one of those shows where, it is popular enough that if they don't pay through the nose, and multiple cast member decide to bail/demand high salary, then AMC is so screwed.   
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Solmyr on April 04, 2016, 03:39:46 PM
Eugene, because he said goodbye this episode and he gave Rick his bullet-making instructions which will become important next season.

Aaron, because AMC is lame and nobody will care about his death.

Or maybe they filmed it that way because Negan was finally killing the series. :P
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tonitrus on April 04, 2016, 03:42:31 PM
Quote from: Solmyr on April 04, 2016, 03:39:46 PM
Eugene, because he said goodbye this episode and he gave Rick his bullet-making instructions which will become important next season.

Agreed, I should have included him.  Especially as they made his character kinda lame.

Aaron?  Kill the primary gay character with a baseball bat beating?  Not sure AMC has the balls to do that.  Plus, he is currently the primary, from-Alexandria character.  They gotta keep some representation.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on April 04, 2016, 03:45:25 PM
Quote from: Tonitrus on April 04, 2016, 03:36:54 PM
Agree that not revealing the beat-down victim was lame.

My guess is either:

Daryl: because of the already known actor-selling-his-house-speculation, and that he does not even exist in the comic (so is expendable, even if a fan-loved character)

Abraham: because he was supposed to have died instead of Denise (per the comic).  So unless they decided they liked the character enough the keep, his clock is ticking.  Argument against?  It doesn't feel like they've fully finished the romance angle with him and Sasha yet.

Glenn: The one who is supposed to be dead.

Wild Card: As mentioned above...based on whomever they cannot resign a contract to.  Seriously...the series is reaching the point where in most, actors start shedding away due to boredom/typecast fears/money.  TWD is one of those shows where, it is popular enough that if they don't pay through the nose, and multiple cast member decide to bail/demand high salary, then AMC is so screwed.

Boy, you hedged your bets. :P
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tonitrus on April 04, 2016, 03:46:07 PM
Quote from: Josephus on April 04, 2016, 03:45:25 PM
Boy, you hedged your bets. :P

In my defense, so did the show.  :P
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on April 04, 2016, 03:46:11 PM
Could very well be Eugene.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tonitrus on April 04, 2016, 07:05:08 PM
Also, I am hating the seemingly pointless turning of Carol from a top badass to the weakest link.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on April 04, 2016, 07:18:36 PM
The Carol storyline has been the weakest of this half season. Yes I think we're supposed to feel her guilt, that she can't cope in this world of dog-eat-dog; but it just doesn't suit her. Wasn't that long ago she took out two little girls for their final walk in the flowers. It seems an unconvincing turn and I'm just not interested.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tonitrus on April 04, 2016, 07:22:19 PM
I mean, I guess they could be playing the "she killed/burned some people, then executed a little girl, so while she was a badass, she was also basically insane" angle, and now all of that has caught up to her.  But it still isn't working very well.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: viper37 on April 05, 2016, 12:15:45 AM
Quote from: Tyr on April 04, 2016, 12:13:48 PM
1: Well that's an anti-climax on Daryll being shot. Though I'm relieved to see an outcome- at first it looked like they were going on end the episode on everyone being surrounded, then I noticed we hadn't reached the end yet.
It should have ended right there.

Quote
2: In the US hunting shops typically carry night vision goggles right? Just realised I haven't seen a single pair on the show. :hmm:
Aren't these things working with batteries?  You'd need to constantly find new batteries to make it work as you can't recharge them.

Quote
4: Typical stupid villains. All that fuss and right when they have our guys they don't kill them all.
Well, that's presumably how they grew to such a large number, by integrating part of their victim's groups.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Solmyr on April 05, 2016, 09:33:35 AM
Maybe Negan kills Glenn after all, next season he'll marry Maggie and they'll have the future Batman as a kid. :P

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fbkk6K93.jpg&hash=1d48dd1abb4986a7eec7c4487e401b2dc9f42f89)
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: crazy canuck on April 05, 2016, 11:46:13 AM
Quote from: Josephus on April 04, 2016, 07:18:36 PM
The Carol storyline has been the weakest of this half season. Yes I think we're supposed to feel her guilt, that she can't cope in this world of dog-eat-dog; but it just doesn't suit her. Wasn't that long ago she took out two little girls for their final walk in the flowers. It seems an unconvincing turn and I'm just not interested.

Agreed.  The story arc of weak abused Carole turning into strong self sufficient Carole was one of the best parts of the show.  It is hard to understand why they decided to make her weak again.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: KRonn on April 05, 2016, 12:16:21 PM
Quote from: crazy canuck on April 05, 2016, 11:46:13 AM
Quote from: Josephus on April 04, 2016, 07:18:36 PM
The Carol storyline has been the weakest of this half season. Yes I think we're supposed to feel her guilt, that she can't cope in this world of dog-eat-dog; but it just doesn't suit her. Wasn't that long ago she took out two little girls for their final walk in the flowers. It seems an unconvincing turn and I'm just not interested.

Agreed.  The story arc of weak abused Carole turning into strong self sufficient Carole was one of the best parts of the show.  It is hard to understand why they decided to make her weak again.

Agreed on that. I kind of just want the story line to be resolved, not much interest in it except that it's Carol's character which I really like. I try to understand her change of heart on things after all the killing, so there is good reasoning behind it. Just that it all happened so fast and didn't come out of a heinous event, but it was probably a culmination of all she'd done before. Remember her having to kill the young girl and prior to that at the prison she killed a couple diseased people to try and stop the spread of a serious illness. That all didn't sit well with her after a while, on top of whatever else she was feeling.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josquius on April 05, 2016, 12:39:29 PM
I'm just not sure where the break point game.
There was no visible time where it would be logical for her to suddenly stop being so tough and revert back to genuinely being weak.
Perhaps due to having to always fake it in Alexandria she came to like being seen that way, yearn for days goneby, etc...?

QuoteAren't these things working with batteries?  You'd need to constantly find new batteries to make it work as you can't recharge them.
There should be plenty of rechargable batteries lying about (I guess the goggles will have internal ones?). Alexandria has stable power. I'm sure other groups have a generator or two.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on April 05, 2016, 05:27:37 PM
Quote from: viper37 on April 05, 2016, 12:15:45 AM
4: Typical stupid villains. All that fuss and right when they have our guys they don't kill them all
Well, that's presumably how they grew to such a large number, by integrating part of their victim's groups.

Yeah, that's key to their MO. They're empire builders not mass murderers. They want Alexandria as one of their puppet states.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Solmyr on April 06, 2016, 05:17:14 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4AUQWOjV6dY
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Siege on April 10, 2016, 09:12:28 PM
I don't know.
Would empire building work that way?
I mean, killing one off at the start?
That would only work with groups that were not tight and not blood related.

If i were empire building on such an scenario, i would be torn between roman style and medieval. Due to total state of decay in which the world is, i think medieval is the way to go.
Create vassals of weaker gangs, offering protection and asking only for military aid whenever i call. Conquer some rivals, spread the wealth around, make sure no one vassal is stronger than you. Be nice to your friends and vassals, hard to your enemies, unforgiving to traitors and rebel vassals.
I don't think is rocket science. Why can't a TV show get it right?

Anyway, if by some reason i were to ask for tribute, half your shit is too punitive for empire building, no matter what's your style. I think a 3rd or less.

My point is, an "state" based on such punitive "economics" as Negans is, would be selected out by natural selection and be destroyed either internally or by outside conquest.

Which, might be the point of the show?
Nah. They are too stupid to get it right.
The last few seasons the "survivors " have made far too many mistakes than in real life would have selected them out of the gene pool by now.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Admiral Yi on April 10, 2016, 09:47:05 PM
Quote from: Siege on March 29, 2016, 07:35:16 PM
No. It doesn't.
Reason is rockets accelerate incrementally. They come out at a slower speed and then pick up, thus not fast enough to detonate on water at the range depicted in the show.

Even worst, the explosion in which the biker gang goes belly up is completely off. There is no way any type of known RPG round can detonate in a surface explosion covering that much area. If it was an HE round it would explode with a kill radius of 10 meters and a fragmentation maximum of 150 meters, which would definitively not do what happened in the show. And an AP round would just make a little hole on the asphalt with the bikers looking at each other.

More importantly, RPG7 rounds do not have proximity fuse, so they would actually have to impact the target to detonate. Due to the target being motorcycles, my money would be on the round just flying between the bikes and going off on the distance.

By the way, when the RPG7 round detonates when shooting at a low flying rotary wing aircraft, it is not a proximity fuse, but the maximum range self detonation fuse, which goes off after 4.5 seconds of flight, between 920 and 1100 meters, depending on the round.

Anyway.

I thought RPGs had HEAT warheads.  No?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Siege on April 11, 2016, 04:39:48 AM
HEAT rounds are explosive shaped charges. They concentrate the explosion on the impact point for maximum penetration, leaving a little hole on the outside and the damage inside is by expanding amd sending fragmentation from the own tanks armor flying in all directions.
It would definitely not do the damage on the show.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Admiral Yi on April 12, 2016, 06:11:40 AM
I know what a HEAT round is.

That's why I asked the question.  I thought RPGs were knock offs of Panzerfausts, which definitely had shaped charge warheads.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tonitrus on April 27, 2016, 04:51:31 PM
Watched the first couple episodes of the new season of FTWD.

Very "meh" so far.

And if you're going to last on a boat during the End of the World...you're better off with a sailing yacht.  :P

And why be lame and make/give Catalina Island a fictional place/name?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: The Minsky Moment on April 27, 2016, 08:54:28 PM
Quote from: Siege on April 10, 2016, 09:12:28 PM
Anyway, if by some reason i were to ask for tribute, half your shit is too punitive for empire building, no matter what's your style. I think a 3rd or less.

Siege knows his classics.  1/3 is what the Barbs took from the Romans according to the traditional sources.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: citizen k on April 28, 2016, 12:09:29 AM
Quote from: Tonitrus on April 27, 2016, 04:51:31 PM
And why be lame and make/give Catalina Island a fictional place/name?

It's an alternative universe. There's bound to be discrepancies.

Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tonitrus on April 28, 2016, 12:11:06 AM
Quote from: citizen k on April 28, 2016, 12:09:29 AM
Quote from: Tonitrus on April 27, 2016, 04:51:31 PM
And why be lame and make/give Catalina Island a fictional place/name?

It's an alternative universe. There's bound to be discrepancies.

It's not like they altered names for Los Angeles, Atlanta, or Alexandria (except that Alexandria looks like rural Georgia, when it obviously shouldn't).
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: lustindarkness on April 28, 2016, 08:31:45 AM
BTW, the latest Fear was pretty good, the show still has a chance.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on April 28, 2016, 12:59:41 PM
Quote from: lustindarkness on April 28, 2016, 08:31:45 AM
BTW, the latest Fear was pretty good, the show still has a chance.

For some reason I can't get interested in any of the characters. They're all annoying.

Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: crazy canuck on April 28, 2016, 03:45:21 PM
Quote from: Josephus on April 28, 2016, 12:59:41 PM
Quote from: lustindarkness on April 28, 2016, 08:31:45 AM
BTW, the latest Fear was pretty good, the show still has a chance.

For some reason I can't get interested in any of the characters. They're all annoying.

Yeah, I keep mistaking the son for one of the Walkers.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: viper37 on April 29, 2016, 08:40:47 AM
Quote from: Tonitrus on April 27, 2016, 04:51:31 PM
And if you're going to last on a boat during the End of the World...you're better off with a sailing yacht.  :P
true, but eventually, you'll need fuel.  They should start thinking about that while it's still time.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on May 24, 2016, 08:55:21 AM
So yeah, Fear TWD isn't resonating with me as much as TWD.

I understand the need for the writers to do something different with it, rather than the same story set in L.A., but , while the strength of TWD is that it's not JUST about zombies, in this one they've pretty much removed the zombies all together. Now it's just a bunch of whining people going around from place to place encountering bad people.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tonitrus on October 11, 2016, 01:15:07 PM
It appears that Maggie (Lauren Cohan) is the one that gets bludgeoned to death.  :(
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on October 11, 2016, 02:54:29 PM
Quote from: Tonitrus on October 11, 2016, 01:15:07 PM
It appears that Maggie (Lauren Cohan) is the one that gets bludgeoned to death.  :(

Source?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: HVC on October 11, 2016, 03:05:44 PM
Quote from: Josephus on October 11, 2016, 02:54:29 PM
Quote from: Tonitrus on October 11, 2016, 01:15:07 PM
It appears that Maggie (Lauren Cohan) is the one that gets bludgeoned to death.  :(

Source?

She broke down crying at a convention so the rumour is her character is the one who dies
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tonitrus on October 11, 2016, 06:37:39 PM
Quote from: HVC on October 11, 2016, 03:05:44 PM
Quote from: Josephus on October 11, 2016, 02:54:29 PM
Quote from: Tonitrus on October 11, 2016, 01:15:07 PM
It appears that Maggie (Lauren Cohan) is the one that gets bludgeoned to death.  :(

Source?

She broke down crying at a convention so the rumour is her character is the one who dies

And clues from a recent S7 scene that was shown.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on October 11, 2016, 08:03:02 PM
Well, apparently two people are going to die in the first episode.
But I wonder how much these clues, including a crying actress, are red herrings?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: HVC on October 11, 2016, 08:08:17 PM
After watching the show for a few season I don't think she's that good an actress to pull that off :D
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Eddie Teach on October 12, 2016, 03:48:13 AM
Quote from: Tyr on April 04, 2016, 12:13:48 PM
At least they didn't just kill one of the no-name characters; black chick no 2. and the guy from Alexandria.

Dude, Sasha's been around forever.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tonitrus on October 12, 2016, 11:03:14 AM
Quote from: HVC on October 11, 2016, 08:08:17 PM
After watching the show for a few season I don't think she's that good an actress to pull that off :D

Hey now...Lauren Cohan is the show's prime HOTTie.  :mad:
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: HVC on October 12, 2016, 11:16:25 AM
Quote from: Tonitrus on October 12, 2016, 11:03:14 AM
Quote from: HVC on October 11, 2016, 08:08:17 PM
After watching the show for a few season I don't think she's that good an actress to pull that off :D

Hey now...Lauren Cohan is the show's prime HOTTie.  :mad:

She's pretty. She was pretty on supernatural too. But she ain't got the chops to pull of the fake cry switcharoo :contract: :D
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: viper37 on October 12, 2016, 02:06:44 PM
Quote from: Josephus on October 11, 2016, 08:03:02 PM
Well, apparently two people are going to die in the first episode.
But I wonder how much these clues, including a crying actress, are red herrings?
If it's written on the internet, it must be true!
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: HVC on October 12, 2016, 02:19:43 PM
Quote from: viper37 on October 12, 2016, 02:06:44 PM
Quote from: Josephus on October 11, 2016, 08:03:02 PM
Well, apparently two people are going to die in the first episode.
But I wonder how much these clues, including a crying actress, are red herrings?
If it's written on the internet, it must be true!

Let's see if that works. I'm a well hung millionaire!

... Hmm, well one out of two ain't bad :P
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Valmy on October 12, 2016, 02:22:38 PM
Quote from: HVC on October 12, 2016, 02:19:43 PM
... Hmm, well one out of two ain't bad :P

Congrats on your vast fortune!
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: HVC on October 12, 2016, 02:24:11 PM
Quote from: Valmy on October 12, 2016, 02:22:38 PM
Quote from: HVC on October 12, 2016, 02:19:43 PM
... Hmm, well one out of two ain't bad :P

Congrats on your vast fortune!

Haha. I actually laughed. I like you, you're one of the good ones.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on October 12, 2016, 04:25:19 PM
Quote from: HVC on October 12, 2016, 02:24:11 PM
Quote from: Valmy on October 12, 2016, 02:22:38 PM
Quote from: HVC on October 12, 2016, 02:19:43 PM
... Hmm, well one out of two ain't bad :P

Congrats on your vast fortune!

Haha. I actually laughed. I like you, you're one of the good ones.

It was a pretty obvious joke, especially for Languish
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Eddie Teach on October 12, 2016, 05:41:31 PM
Yeah I was going to make it too.  :P
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: HVC on October 12, 2016, 05:57:04 PM
Quote from: Josephus on October 12, 2016, 04:25:19 PM
Quote from: HVC on October 12, 2016, 02:24:11 PM
Quote from: Valmy on October 12, 2016, 02:22:38 PM
Quote from: HVC on October 12, 2016, 02:19:43 PM
... Hmm, well one out of two ain't bad :P

Congrats on your vast fortune!

Haha. I actually laughed. I like you, you're one of the good ones.

It was a pretty obvious joke, especially for Languish

just because its obvious does not mean its not good. like early to mid series walking dead (except for the god damn farm).
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: lustindarkness on October 23, 2016, 08:35:45 PM
Holy shit, what an episode already.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Grey Fox on October 23, 2016, 08:46:01 PM
FFS stop killing Michael Cudlitz characters. Dude needs the work.

Also not watching this season.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on October 24, 2016, 08:02:55 AM
Maggie is a good actress afterall  :lol:
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josquius on October 24, 2016, 04:18:49 PM
An hour before finishing work I had a conversation with my coworker on who we think will die

Him: I think the moutache guy. The ginger hair one.
Me: hmm....that would be kind of a let down I think since he's suicidal anyway. I think it'll be Glenn.

What do you know. We're both right.
It seems they set it up this way intentionally that you think "oh, so I waited all that time for the guy who was going to die anyway to die?" then *poof*
At least they didn't cop out with the nobodies.

Overall....I must say I didn't like this episode. Felt like torture porn. For people who are into films like the Human Centipede. Bleh.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: lustindarkness on October 24, 2016, 04:26:05 PM
The most difficult thing to watch for me was the breaking of Rick.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Zoupa on October 24, 2016, 06:00:52 PM
Episode sucked.  They desperately need new ideas/new writers. Fuck following the comics. Kirkman is a hack anyways.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: 11B4V on October 24, 2016, 06:38:28 PM
Quote from: Zoupa on October 24, 2016, 06:00:52 PM
Episode sucked.  They desperately need new ideas/new writers. Fuck following the comics. Kirkman is a hack anyways.

This I agree with.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Zoupa on October 24, 2016, 08:48:27 PM
Season synopsis for the last 3-4 seasons: roam around, find a safe place, group gets split, face a new enemy, gets reunited, wins, somebody dies. Rinse and repeat. Bleh.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: viper37 on October 25, 2016, 12:06:58 PM
Quote from: HVC on October 11, 2016, 08:08:17 PM
After watching the show for a few season I don't think she's that good an actress to pull that off :D
Maybe you were right...

TWD: an alternative scene shows Negan killing Maggie (http://pix-geeks.com/the-walking-dead-scene-alternative-montre-negan-entrain-tuer-maggie/)

Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Solmyr on October 25, 2016, 06:39:28 PM
Quote from: Zoupa on October 24, 2016, 06:00:52 PM
Episode sucked.  They desperately need new ideas/new writers. Fuck following the comics. Kirkman is a hack anyways.

:huh: Pretty much everyone everywhere agrees that this was a fantastic episode with great acting from Morgan and Lincoln.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: 11B4V on October 25, 2016, 06:46:52 PM
Quote from: Solmyr on October 25, 2016, 06:39:28 PM
Quote from: Zoupa on October 24, 2016, 06:00:52 PM
Episode sucked.  They desperately need new ideas/new writers. Fuck following the comics. Kirkman is a hack anyways.

:huh: Pretty much everyone everywhere agrees that this was a fantastic episode with great acting from Morgan and Lincoln.

No. So Solly
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Habbaku on October 25, 2016, 07:13:49 PM
Quote from: Solmyr on October 25, 2016, 06:39:28 PM
Quote from: Zoupa on October 24, 2016, 06:00:52 PM
Episode sucked.  They desperately need new ideas/new writers. Fuck following the comics. Kirkman is a hack anyways.

:huh: Pretty much everyone everywhere agrees that this was a fantastic episode with great acting from Morgan and Lincoln.

:huh:  https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/the_walking_dead/s07/e01/
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Zoupa on October 25, 2016, 09:21:51 PM
Quote from: Solmyr on October 25, 2016, 06:39:28 PM
Quote from: Zoupa on October 24, 2016, 06:00:52 PM
Episode sucked.  They desperately need new ideas/new writers. Fuck following the comics. Kirkman is a hack anyways.

:huh: Pretty much everyone everywhere agrees that this was a fantastic episode with great acting from Morgan and Lincoln.

Ok? I'm just giving my opinion, man. Acting is usually not the problem with this show. The writing is.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Eddie Teach on October 25, 2016, 09:27:20 PM
Don't call Negan Morgan, that's just confusing.

Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Solmyr on October 26, 2016, 04:52:31 AM
GoT, a show about knights and dragons and political intrigue, has pregnant women stabbed in the stomach and little girls burned alive: everyone is fine.

Walking Dead, a show about apocalypse and zombies with loads of gore, has two people get their heads bashed in: everyone loses their shit.

IMO this episode shows brilliantly the breaking of Rick and what kind of threat Negan is.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Solmyr on October 26, 2016, 05:22:07 AM
https://gfycat.com/MildLimitedBurro

:D
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Zoupa on October 26, 2016, 06:17:08 PM
Quote from: Solmyr on October 26, 2016, 04:52:31 AM
GoT, a show about knights and dragons and political intrigue, has pregnant women stabbed in the stomach and little girls burned alive: everyone is fine.

Walking Dead, a show about apocalypse and zombies with loads of gore, has two people get their heads bashed in: everyone loses their shit.

IMO this episode shows brilliantly the breaking of Rick and what kind of threat Negan is.

I recall plenty of outrage following certain episodes of GoT, most notably the ones graphically showing rape scenes.

Nobody is "losing their shit" over TWD's season opener. Critics are pointing out that it was gore for the sake of gore, that it was lazy, phoned in, and just plain bad writing.

Everybody knew they're not going to show a man beating a woman to death with a baseball bat. Same with the gay guy, same with the kid. They're also not going to kill Rick. So that leaves the redhead, Glenn, Eugene and fan favourite Daryl.

They picked redhead, ok I guess? Relatively new character, bah, humbug. Then they picked Glenn, which should have been dead last season during another shitty/lazy cliffhanger/surprise of an episode.

So after alienating a bunch of their viewers with that fake-out, they kill Glenn 6 episodes later, and people had to wait 6-7 months for that.

In conclusion: the writing is crap, and instead of tearing up, I burst out laughing when Glenn was babbling with his eye hanging out. Not a great send-off for a character that's been there since the 2nd episode of the whole series...
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: lustindarkness on October 26, 2016, 07:04:53 PM
Do not agree with all you posted.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Grey Fox on October 26, 2016, 08:35:58 PM
I agree with Zoupa's conclusion but not how he gets there. Not at all.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on October 26, 2016, 08:48:32 PM
Quote from: Solmyr on October 26, 2016, 04:52:31 AM
GoT, a show about knights and dragons and political intrigue, has pregnant women stabbed in the stomach and little girls burned alive: everyone is fine.

Walking Dead, a show about apocalypse and zombies with loads of gore, has two people get their heads bashed in: everyone loses their shit.

IMO this episode shows brilliantly the breaking of Rick and what kind of threat Negan is.

Could use nudity though
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josquius on October 27, 2016, 01:54:34 AM
Glenn is the lady's favourite. Hence the upset
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Solmyr on October 27, 2016, 05:21:26 AM
Quote from: Zoupa on October 26, 2016, 06:17:08 PM
Nobody is "losing their shit" over TWD's season opener. Critics are pointing out that it was gore for the sake of gore, that it was lazy, phoned in, and just plain bad writing.

The victims were leaked months ago, that's not the point. As I posted, the head-bashing is used to establish what kind of threat Negan is. He does not fuck around, compared to, say, the Governor who did fuck all. And the scene is pretty much directly taken from the comic, so I don't see why the gore is somehow reason to complain.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Grey Fox on October 27, 2016, 10:41:38 AM
I watched multiple clips on youtube.

I love Negan.

As the promo shows Negan is in charge now.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Habbaku on October 27, 2016, 10:54:21 AM
Quote from: Solmyr on October 27, 2016, 05:21:26 AM
Quote from: Zoupa on October 26, 2016, 06:17:08 PM
Nobody is "losing their shit" over TWD's season opener. Critics are pointing out that it was gore for the sake of gore, that it was lazy, phoned in, and just plain bad writing.

The victims were leaked months ago, that's not the point. As I posted, the head-bashing is used to establish what kind of threat Negan is. He does not fuck around, compared to, say, the Governor who did fuck all. And the scene is pretty much directly taken from the comic, so I don't see why the gore is somehow reason to complain.

What works in a comic doesn't necessarily work in TV.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Grey Fox on October 27, 2016, 11:08:56 AM
Well, yeah. That's why Rick, Carl, Michonne, Carol, Morgan & Daryl are not losing a limb anytime soon. No one wants to pay for that level of CGI.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on October 27, 2016, 11:39:14 AM
Quote from: Solmyr on October 27, 2016, 05:21:26 AM
Quote from: Zoupa on October 26, 2016, 06:17:08 PM
Nobody is "losing their shit" over TWD's season opener. Critics are pointing out that it was gore for the sake of gore, that it was lazy, phoned in, and just plain bad writing.

The victims were leaked months ago, that's not the point. As I posted, the head-bashing is used to establish what kind of threat Negan is. He does not fuck around, compared to, say, the Governor who did fuck all. And the scene is pretty much directly taken from the comic, so I don't see why the gore is somehow reason to complain.

Were they? I thought they did a pretty good job of not leaking. Even Langusih was saying Maggie just a week ago.
Sure, many people thought Glenn would die based on the comic book.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tamas on October 27, 2016, 11:49:02 AM
 :yawn:
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Habbaku on October 27, 2016, 11:58:55 AM
Quote from: Tamas on October 27, 2016, 11:49:02 AM
:yawn:

The show, in essence.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josquius on October 27, 2016, 12:41:47 PM
I wonder... was the Glenn dead/not dead stupidity earlier in the series purely a red herring for the negan incident to counteract the obvious comic evidence ?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Solmyr on October 28, 2016, 05:39:07 AM
Quote from: Josephus on October 27, 2016, 11:39:14 AM
Were they? I thought they did a pretty good job of not leaking. Even Langusih was saying Maggie just a week ago.
Sure, many people thought Glenn would die based on the comic book.

Well, not "leaked" per se, but JDM accidentally mentioned "deaths" (multiple) in an interview and people noted the two actors not filming anymore after the first episode was done.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Zoupa on October 29, 2016, 04:42:03 AM
Quote from: Tyr on October 27, 2016, 12:41:47 PM
I wonder... was the Glenn dead/not dead stupidity earlier in the series purely a red herring for the negan incident to counteract the obvious comic evidence ?

I think at this point the showrunners just like to take a dump on their viewers for giggles. Like an abused and addicted crackwhore, we keep coming back anyway. Why not fuck with us just for the hell of it?  :lol:
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Eddie Teach on October 29, 2016, 10:34:49 AM
Why can't Jon Snow be dead instead of Glenn?  :(
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Solmyr on October 30, 2016, 04:57:56 PM
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1374.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fag401%2FBSUTOP25%2F4D904CFD-93D4-41BB-BEB0-6D9315887656_zps0maflvqc.jpg&hash=9c41629bae34d2b25014177631a083b8369efb4a)
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: lustindarkness on October 30, 2016, 09:59:54 PM
Interesting episode, and nice change of pace after that last one.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: crazy canuck on November 01, 2016, 08:38:38 AM
Watched the two episodes back to back last night.  I agree with the comment made here about the breaking of Rick.  Great writing and better acting. 

For the complainers, to paraphrase Nagen, do you even understand what just happened  :P
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josquius on November 01, 2016, 12:01:16 PM
Tiger man.
Wins rule of cool.
But oh so silly.

I hope they explain someday how the Negan gang got so big they could do all this.

And pigs eating zombies. Didn't know that was a thing. How come bears and wolves aren't running rampant.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Zoupa on November 01, 2016, 02:36:05 PM
Because it's set in Georgia.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: viper37 on November 01, 2016, 04:20:54 PM
Quote from: Tyr on November 01, 2016, 12:01:16 PM
And pigs eating zombies. Didn't know that was a thing. How come bears and wolves aren't running rampant.
we have seen wild animals eating zombies before, if I recall correctly.  Might have been dogs, but I thought it was wolves, in S1 or S2, I think.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Crazy_Ivan80 on November 01, 2016, 04:49:53 PM
Quote from: Tyr on November 01, 2016, 12:01:16 PM

And pigs eating zombies.

pigs eat virtually everything. Good method to get rid of a corpse, if you have them available. Corpse doesn'thave to be dead for it to work either.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josquius on November 01, 2016, 04:57:56 PM
Quote from: Crazy_Ivan80 on November 01, 2016, 04:49:53 PM
Quote from: Tyr on November 01, 2016, 12:01:16 PM

And pigs eating zombies.

pigs eat virtually everything. Good method to get rid of a corpse, if you have them available. Corpse doesn'thave to be dead for it to work either.
Yeah but in most zombie settings animals stay clear of them . They're not regular dead things.

Though if viper is right (I remember some dogs but not eating something) then fair enough
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Eddie Teach on November 01, 2016, 05:06:22 PM
You know, it could be a very bad thing for the pigs to eat zombies- those pigs were handed over to the Saviors after all. Perhaps they were tired of paying tribute.  :hmm:
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tonitrus on November 01, 2016, 07:48:27 PM
Quote from: Zoupa on November 01, 2016, 02:36:05 PM
Because it's set in Georgia.

Still filmed in Georgia, but the setting is supposed to be in DC/Northern Virginia area now.

Also...saw more bears (wild) in the panhandle of Florida in a month than in my first 3 years in Alaska (this second time around has been more bear-ful  :P)
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: viper37 on November 01, 2016, 10:57:46 PM
Quote from: Crazy_Ivan80 on November 01, 2016, 04:49:53 PM
Quote from: Tyr on November 01, 2016, 12:01:16 PM

And pigs eating zombies.

pigs eat virtually everything. Good method to get rid of a corpse, if you have them available. Corpse doesn'thave to be dead for it to work either.
Hannibal taught us that.   :shifty:
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: HVC on November 02, 2016, 12:53:41 AM
Quote from: viper37 on November 01, 2016, 10:57:46 PM
Quote from: Crazy_Ivan80 on November 01, 2016, 04:49:53 PM
Quote from: Tyr on November 01, 2016, 12:01:16 PM

And pigs eating zombies.

pigs eat virtually everything. Good method to get rid of a corpse, if you have them available. Corpse doesn'thave to be dead for it to work either.
Hannibal taught us that.   :shifty:

And the lesson was reinforced by picton.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Solmyr on November 02, 2016, 05:50:34 AM
Quote from: Eddie Teach on November 01, 2016, 05:06:22 PM
You know, it could be a very bad thing for the pigs to eat zombies- those pigs were handed over to the Saviors after all. Perhaps they were tired of paying tribute.  :hmm:

The main trapper guy pretty much says that is the reason.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on November 02, 2016, 12:00:05 PM
I guess it's the equivalent of the waiter spitting in your soup if he doesn't like you
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: viper37 on November 02, 2016, 12:45:58 PM
Quote from: Tyr on November 01, 2016, 04:57:56 PM
Though if viper is right (I remember some dogs but not eating something) then fair enough
Come to think of it, I don't think we've seen wolves in that show.  Dogs, I'm pretty sure.  Zombies eating a dear, yes.  But wolves, no, it didn't happen.  I must be thinking of something else.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Siege on November 02, 2016, 07:26:54 PM
Where is the anime thread?
I cannot see it anywhere.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: viper37 on November 02, 2016, 11:11:05 PM
The saddest thing is, after being introduced to such a great character, they'll likely kill Shiva before the end of the season :(
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on November 03, 2016, 06:04:57 AM
Quote from: viper37 on November 02, 2016, 11:11:05 PM
The saddest thing is, after being introduced to such a great character, they'll likely kill Sheba before the end of the season :(

Shiva  ;)
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Valmy on November 03, 2016, 07:59:48 AM
Quote from: Siege on November 02, 2016, 07:26:54 PM
Where is the anime thread?
I cannot see it anywhere.

Here you go buddy: http://languish.org/forums/index.php/topic,11163.msg1026551.html#msg1026551
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: viper37 on November 03, 2016, 09:09:22 AM
Quote from: Josephus on November 03, 2016, 06:04:57 AM
Quote from: viper37 on November 02, 2016, 11:11:05 PM
The saddest thing is, after being introduced to such a great character, they'll likely kill Sheba before the end of the season :(

Shiva  ;)
duh! 
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josquius on November 04, 2016, 03:43:02 AM
It's shiva?
Oh. Sheba is much more fitting, being a stereotypical pussy cat name and all.



___


Most recent ep- ....not sure what was going on with those guys in the letter clothes messing around with the zombies.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: lustindarkness on November 07, 2016, 02:13:55 PM
I think those Z's on the fence are maybe to keep their prisoners from jumping said fence? Either that or just Halloween decorations.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: derspiess on November 07, 2016, 02:32:41 PM
Quote from: viper37 on November 02, 2016, 12:45:58 PM
Quote from: Tyr on November 01, 2016, 04:57:56 PM
Though if viper is right (I remember some dogs but not eating something) then fair enough
Come to think of it, I don't think we've seen wolves in that show.  Dogs, I'm pretty sure.  Zombies eating a dear, yes.  But wolves, no, it didn't happen.  I must be thinking of something else.

There are no wolves in the Eastern US.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Zoupa on November 07, 2016, 09:55:28 PM
I'm pretty sure the Carolinas have wolves no?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: derspiess on November 07, 2016, 09:58:31 PM
No.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tonitrus on November 07, 2016, 10:05:01 PM
Apologies for the small map:

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.endangered.org%2Fcms%2Fassets%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F07%2Fmapwolf.jpg&hash=56cf0f52e3da01e7d0e7eb65f1617daa193bd2d6)

There has apparently, been an effort to reintroduce red wolves to the east coast area (namely in North Carolina).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_wolf#History_and_extirpation_in_the_wild

Still, there are very few (about 50, according to the US FWS)...and red wolves can probably be easily mixed/confused with coyotes.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: derspiess on November 07, 2016, 10:09:07 PM
How many?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tonitrus on November 07, 2016, 10:09:53 PM
Quote from: derspiess on November 07, 2016, 10:09:07 PM
How many?

Edited into the above, according to FWS, only about 50.

https://www.fws.gov/redwolf/
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Zoupa on November 07, 2016, 10:31:28 PM
 :showoff:
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: derspiess on November 07, 2016, 11:40:29 PM
So basically none.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Zoupa on November 08, 2016, 02:12:08 AM
1 > 0
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Syt on November 08, 2016, 02:22:13 AM
Quote from: Tonitrus on November 07, 2016, 10:05:01 PM
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.endangered.org%2Fcms%2Fassets%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F07%2Fmapwolf.jpg&hash=56cf0f52e3da01e7d0e7eb65f1617daa193bd2d6)

There, wolf?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: viper37 on November 08, 2016, 03:04:04 PM
Quote from: derspiess on November 07, 2016, 02:32:41 PM
Quote from: viper37 on November 02, 2016, 12:45:58 PM
Quote from: Tyr on November 01, 2016, 04:57:56 PM
Though if viper is right (I remember some dogs but not eating something) then fair enough
Come to think of it, I don't think we've seen wolves in that show.  Dogs, I'm pretty sure.  Zombies eating a dear, yes.  But wolves, no, it didn't happen.  I must be thinking of something else.

There are no wolves in the Eastern US.
There are no zombies either, yet they are in the show, so... ;)
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Eddie Teach on November 08, 2016, 03:07:57 PM
Escaped zoo lions should be spreading out. :hmm:
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: viper37 on November 08, 2016, 03:13:15 PM
Quote from: Eddie Teach on November 08, 2016, 03:07:57 PM
Escaped zoo lions should be spreading out. :hmm:
they were locked in cages with no food.  It could be a bad idea to open the door to a starving lion.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: viper37 on November 08, 2016, 04:47:54 PM
Quote from: lustindarkness on November 07, 2016, 02:13:55 PM
I think those Z's on the fence are maybe to keep their prisoners from jumping said fence? Either that or just Halloween decorations.
I vote for Halloween decorations ;)

Actually, I think it is to deter an attack on the homebase.  Anyone who wishes to sneak on the Saviors would need to kill all the zombies first, if they ever hope of reaching the fort.  And there would be excitement from the zombies, which would raise alarm at some of the guards.  Kinda like a moat for a castle, makes storming the castle more difficult.  I don't know if it was always like that, or if they adapted after their first confrontations with Rick's group.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: crazy canuck on November 14, 2016, 09:18:16 AM
So, Rick had thought of hiding some guns but didnt think about getting rid of the inventory list?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: viper37 on November 14, 2016, 09:42:40 AM
Quote from: crazy canuck on November 14, 2016, 09:18:16 AM
So, Rick had thought of hiding some guns but didnt think about getting rid of the inventory list?
It could be that Negan's surprise visit took him off guard.  Which was the point of it.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josquius on November 14, 2016, 01:40:56 PM
Is it just me or is this week's Walking Dead really along the lines of the current political zeitgeist?

From the Trumpist POV of course.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: derspiess on November 14, 2016, 02:03:48 PM
Quote from: Zoupa on November 08, 2016, 02:12:08 AM
1 > 0

I saw a wolf at the zoo yesterday.  OMG OHIO HAS WOLFS
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Grey Fox on November 14, 2016, 02:10:04 PM
Is Maggie dead? I'm confused.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: viper37 on November 14, 2016, 03:31:49 PM
Quote from: Grey Fox on November 14, 2016, 02:10:04 PM
Is Maggie dead? I'm confused.
Nope, she's alive.  She stayed behind at the scene of their first encouter with Negan, with someone else.  The previews for nextweek shows her at Hilltop.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tonitrus on December 05, 2016, 02:38:24 AM
I appreciated Michonne's homage to Omar.  :P
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Solmyr on December 06, 2016, 11:02:18 AM
Father Gabriel ftw.

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FFejbNjJ.gif&hash=fe5705313cdf58eceab3b116f777c25c16930f86)
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on December 06, 2016, 12:01:26 PM
I guess Fr. Gabriel isn't Catholic...cause sins of thought are sins.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: crazy canuck on December 07, 2016, 11:48:50 AM
Quote from: Josephus on December 06, 2016, 12:01:26 PM
I guess Fr. Gabriel isn't Catholic...cause sins of thought are sins.

Yeah, I didnt understand why that wasn't a sin.

Also, Negan has a point.  Why are there so many fat people in a world short of food.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on December 07, 2016, 07:43:58 PM
Quote from: crazy canuck on December 07, 2016, 11:48:50 AM
Quote from: Josephus on December 06, 2016, 12:01:26 PM
I guess Fr. Gabriel isn't Catholic...cause sins of thought are sins.

Yeah, I didnt understand why that wasn't a sin.

Also, Negan has a point.  Why are there so many fat people in a world short of food.

She's big-boned.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: derspiess on December 07, 2016, 08:54:10 PM
I don't usually watch the show, but Negan had a few good one-liners in this one.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Eddie Teach on December 09, 2016, 01:08:16 AM
Frankly, I think Negan's a bit too cartoonish.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on December 09, 2016, 08:30:08 AM
Quote from: Eddie Teach on December 09, 2016, 01:08:16 AM
Frankly, I think Negan's a bit too cartoonish.

You know it is based on a comic, right.  :contract:
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Eddie Teach on December 09, 2016, 08:45:50 AM
They've been pretty good up to now at avoiding the pitfalls of the medium.

But seriously, no way he's ruled this way for this long and nobody's shot him in the back.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josquius on December 09, 2016, 04:12:20 PM
I don't know what to make of Neegan. He really does have something odd about him. I guess that's what makes him creepy.
I hope they do his back story at some point and show how his presumable biker gang core came to save and enslave so many.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Pedrito on December 09, 2016, 04:24:40 PM
Quote from: Eddie Teach on December 09, 2016, 08:45:50 AM
But seriously, no way he's ruled this way for this long and nobody's shot him in the back.
My same thought.

L.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: crazy canuck on December 09, 2016, 05:05:10 PM
Quote from: Eddie Teach on December 09, 2016, 08:45:50 AM
They've been pretty good up to now at avoiding the pitfalls of the medium.

But seriously, no way he's ruled this way for this long and nobody's shot him in the back.

I think they are modelling him after a typical warlord who rules through fear pretty well.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on December 09, 2016, 05:34:32 PM
Quote from: Eddie Teach on December 09, 2016, 08:45:50 AM
They've been pretty good up to now at avoiding the pitfalls of the medium.

But seriously, no way he's ruled this way for this long and nobody's shot him in the back.

He's no different than, say, Stalin.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Eddie Teach on December 09, 2016, 06:16:37 PM
Did Stalin keep Beria's wife as his mistress?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on December 09, 2016, 07:48:28 PM
Quote from: Eddie Teach on December 09, 2016, 06:16:37 PM
Did Stalin keep Beria's wife as his mistress?

have you ever seen beria's wife?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tonitrus on December 09, 2016, 09:27:20 PM
Quote from: Tyr on December 09, 2016, 04:12:20 PM
I don't know what to make of Neegan. He really does have something odd about him. I guess that's what makes him creepy.
I hope they do his back story at some point and show how his presumable biker gang core came to save and enslave so many.

His comic backstory is a former high school physical education/gym teacher.

Which in the context of American culture, explains his character pretty well.  :P
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on April 02, 2017, 06:51:15 AM
Did you guys forget about this? :huh:
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tonitrus on April 02, 2017, 10:09:43 PM
Nah. 

Still watching...this season has been kinda dragging.  I know it's following the comic, but it feels like just another Governor plot line, just on a larger scale.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tonitrus on April 03, 2017, 01:08:50 AM
And as it was the season finale...

With all of its faults, at least they didn't crap out another cliffhanger this time (just a lead up to the next level of the story).

The whole exercise of bringing around the junk-pile people, only to dispose of them as turncoats seemed silly and pointless. 

Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on April 03, 2017, 11:55:04 AM
[spoiler][It was a fairly weak finale. I'm bothered with plots that don't make sense. Why did Negan even bother with the whole Sasha in the coffin trick? What advantage was it supposed to give him? Force Rick to give in to his demands? Um...all he had to do was say, "Rick, do this or i'll kill [anyone]." It was a very weak set up.

And yeah, the Scavengers. Why did chief Scavenger keep her gun on Rick for the whole battle? Meh...thank god for the tiger.[/spoiler]
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josquius on April 03, 2017, 01:05:05 PM
I'm watching but Meh.
Really no getting how they just suddenly trusted these dump people.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: The Minsky Moment on April 03, 2017, 03:16:18 PM
The junk people . . . it's supposed to something be 3 years or so after Z-day?  Would a whole group of adult people completely forget how to speak in sentences in such a short time period?  The whole talk in a one-word sentences thing seemed very cheesy.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tonitrus on April 03, 2017, 07:32:09 PM
Quote from: The Minsky Moment on April 03, 2017, 03:16:18 PM
The junk people . . . it's supposed to something be 3 years or so after Z-day?  Would a whole group of adult people completely forget how to speak in sentences in such a short time period?  The whole talk in a one-word sentences thing seemed very cheesy.

Yeah, I was going to mention that too.  Humanity isn't far enough removed from this "apocalypse" to be that way yet.  This ain't freakin' Mad Max.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: crazy canuck on April 03, 2017, 11:07:34 PM
Josephus, this is a spoilers thread  ;)

I thought the deal with the trash people not well thought out.  Rick made a deal with a group that makes no secret of the fact they are all about their own self interest (a tribe of Yi if you will); Rick gives them everything the want up front; and then expects them to live up to their end.  I would have been more disappointed if they had written the ending with the tribe of Yi honouring Rick's deal because there was no reason for them to do it and stay in character.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: crazy canuck on April 03, 2017, 11:08:40 PM
Quote from: The Minsky Moment on April 03, 2017, 03:16:18 PM
The junk people . . . it's supposed to something be 3 years or so after Z-day?  Would a whole group of adult people completely forget how to speak in sentences in such a short time period?  The whole talk in a one-word sentences thing seemed very cheesy.


A group of social rejects who found eachother.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: The Minsky Moment on April 04, 2017, 01:14:10 AM
Quote from: crazy canuck on April 03, 2017, 11:08:40 PM
A group of social rejects who found eachother.

OK but I'm talking about The Walking Dead, not languish.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josquius on April 04, 2017, 02:55:02 AM
Quote from: crazy canuck on April 03, 2017, 11:07:34 PM
Josephus, this is a spoilers thread  ;)

I thought the deal with the trash people not well thought out.  Rick made a deal with a group that makes no secret of the fact they are all about their own self interest (a tribe of Yi if you will); Rick gives them everything the want up front; and then expects them to live up to their end.  I would have been more disappointed if they had written the ending with the tribe of Yi honouring Rick's deal because there was no reason for them to do it and stay in character.

Agreed.
Especially when I saw their actual plan, letting these people who out number them into their town.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on April 04, 2017, 07:42:56 AM
Quote from: Tonitrus on April 03, 2017, 07:32:09 PM
Quote from: The Minsky Moment on April 03, 2017, 03:16:18 PM
The junk people . . . it's supposed to something be 3 years or so after Z-day?  Would a whole group of adult people completely forget how to speak in sentences in such a short time period?  The whole talk in a one-word sentences thing seemed very cheesy.

Yeah, I was going to mention that too.  Humanity isn't far enough removed from this "apocalypse" to be that way yet.  This ain't freakin' Mad Max.

I just figure they were just trailer trash types BEFORE the apocalypse
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: crazy canuck on November 07, 2017, 10:13:40 AM
I think I am going to stop watching this. 

last episode Rick and a number of others could have died but the episode lacked any tension or suspense.  One guy did die - big emotional scene (or at least it was supposed to be I guess).  Didn't even know his name.  The biggest issue was whether the Savior prisoners should be killed or not.   :zzz
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Grey Fox on November 07, 2017, 11:13:48 AM
Morales.

I read recaps, takes 5 minutes & it's way more enjoyable than just watching the show.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: The Minsky Moment on November 07, 2017, 11:17:43 AM
This is an interesting TV show about dueling bands of militia groups.  It takes place in an economically depressed and deindustrialized region of present day Virginia, where apparently local budget cuts have forced disbandment of police forces, leaving the violent militias free to run rampant.  The militia groups on both sides follow some sort of survivalist philosophy, growing their own food, and recycling materials from abandoned factories and gas stations.  Due to lax state gun laws automatic weapons are plentiful, but because of the economic downturn there don't seem to be many well functioning hospitals or health clinics.  One of the militia groups follows a Christian millenarian worldview (the "Saviours"), the other is more eclectic but for some reason abuses zoo animals.  Basically it's like the Hatfields & McCoys but with more ethnic diversity.

Oh also there are some zombies around.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on November 07, 2017, 05:57:12 PM
You're not the only one CC. This season so far has been one long drawn out battle with very little emotional impact.

The gay guy dying was supposed to be impactful, certainly they made a big deal on Talking Dead, but I was....whatever.

This season could be a big turning point for the show.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josquius on November 08, 2017, 02:43:36 AM
The start of the last episode with a bunch of disjointed scenes of the kingdom lot including their being ambushed.... Ugh.
And the ending too. Blahh
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Tonitrus on November 08, 2017, 05:24:13 PM
I am in agreement with ya'll.  The first few episodes has been impressive in making gun battles tired and boring. 

TWD has definitely entered that lazy/entitled phase that catches most well-performing series'.

And there is probably a good reason the best quality shows lately have been ones that practically had an end-state already in place (e.g. Breaking Bad), and not as open-ended as TWD is.

And the TWD will have, at some point, that ticking time bomb coming of a declining successful series/actor contract negotiations.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Eddie Teach on November 08, 2017, 06:04:59 PM
I'm still enjoying TWD. Could do without the speeches and montages of people looking determined though.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: KRonn on November 12, 2017, 12:19:38 PM
I still really enjoy TWD, one of my favorite shows. But I'm a bit mixed on this season as it's going to be all battles. That can be good, exciting and given how events have progressed it certainly makes sense. Just that it seems a bit over done for what is probably an entire season. That said, society is in an anarchist stage, different groups trying to survive and gain power and even  early on the show was more about the interactions of survivors and their groups more so than the walkers. This clash is the biggest, very much dwarfing even the Governor vs the Prison.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josquius on November 13, 2017, 12:25:13 PM
Jesus that was one of the dumbest things I ever saw.

First random saviour guy over acting to hell.
Then the ditch of death.
King decides to randomly shout go on without me when they were in no immediate danger and could have just walked away....
Then in comes the tiger to kill itself for no good reason.
Contrived attempt to cut the special effects budget
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: citizen k on November 13, 2017, 05:05:28 PM
Quote from: KRonn on November 12, 2017, 12:19:38 PM
That said, society is in an anarchist stage,

I would say it's in more of a warlord stage. Not much voluntary cooperation going on in the Dark Ages 2.0.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: KRonn on November 16, 2017, 03:10:43 PM
Quote from: citizen k on November 13, 2017, 05:05:28 PM
Quote from: KRonn on November 12, 2017, 12:19:38 PM
That said, society is in an anarchist stage,

I would say it's in more of a warlord stage. Not much voluntary cooperation going on in the Dark Ages 2.0.

Yeah, right. I was going to say Feudal stage but they haven't yet progressed to that.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on November 28, 2017, 01:09:37 PM
So looks like Morgan is crossing over to Fear The Walking Dead...or as the actor calls it Fear Of The Walking Dead.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Eddie Teach on November 28, 2017, 02:25:27 PM
I'm a bit curious where each show is on the timeline.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on November 29, 2017, 08:34:52 AM
They must be caught up now, if Morgan's joining the other.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josquius on November 29, 2017, 10:08:08 AM
Fear has gone past the collapse of civilization now?
I watched the first episode or two of that but never got into it.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Eddie Teach on November 29, 2017, 10:12:43 AM
Honestly Fear still feels like it should be in the first year. There haven't been any points where it feels like everyone is settled in and they can skip a few months or years.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: crazy canuck on November 29, 2017, 10:23:56 AM
Quote from: Eddie Teach on November 29, 2017, 10:12:43 AM
Honestly Fear still feels like it should be in the first year. There haven't been any points where it feels like everyone is settled in and they can skip a few months or years.

Yeah, escape from LA was a few weeks; cruise to Mexico a matter of days; escape from what seemed to be a safe haven; a few weeks wondering about; a few weeks at the resort; then a few months with the survivalists.  Add in a few more months to be generous for other miscellaneous side plots.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Eddie Teach on December 03, 2017, 11:34:22 PM
Ok, that (lack of a) play with the junkyard people was really dumb. Great, so Rick's a badass. He's still an idiot for walking in there alone.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on December 04, 2017, 09:15:52 AM
Quote from: Eddie Teach on December 03, 2017, 11:34:22 PM
Ok, that (lack of a) play with the junkyard people was really dumb. Great, so Rick's a badass. He's still an idiot for walking in there alone.

Yeah that whole thing was weak. There was no reason after Rick let her go, for her to stick to her word either.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: crazy canuck on December 04, 2017, 12:27:08 PM
This whole season is full of stupid.

They go to great lengths to plan out the perfect attack plan; take days to execute it; the plan works; the compound is surrounded as planned; the attempt to save the compound with the speaker truck is thwarted; and then a group who knows the plan and schedule decides to freelance because they are concerned something might go wrong?

Yeah, the thing that went wrong is not sticking to the plan.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: KRonn on December 04, 2017, 06:35:41 PM
Quote from: crazy canuck on December 04, 2017, 12:27:08 PM
This whole season is full of stupid.

They go to great lengths to plan out the perfect attack plan; take days to execute it; the plan works; the compound is surrounded as planned; the attempt to save the compound with the speaker truck is thwarted; and then a group who knows the plan and schedule decides to freelance because they are concerned something might go wrong?

Yeah, the thing that went wrong is not sticking to the plan.

I found the truck plan out of whack too, but I tried to understand their thinking that the Saviors could do something to escape if things dragged out. But driving the truck into the building just let the walkers go in to slaughter then the Saviors could escape.

What I didn't understand or maybe I missed the pretense, but why did Rick go into the heapsters compound alone? If he wanted to bargain he should have had a few people with him and asked for a parlay outside the heapster compound in a more neutral setting.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josquius on December 06, 2017, 12:24:08 PM
What happened to all the snipers is my wonder. Something I missed?
And Eugene's plan was... Shoot all the zombies?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: crazy canuck on December 06, 2017, 12:35:03 PM
Quote from: Tyr on December 06, 2017, 12:24:08 PM
What happened to all the snipers is my wonder. Something I missed?
And Eugene's plan was... Shoot all the zombies?

Yep, apparently he didnt think about that plan when the zombies were safely outside the walls.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: KRonn on December 06, 2017, 03:18:38 PM
Quote from: Tyr on December 06, 2017, 12:24:08 PM
What happened to all the snipers is my wonder. Something I missed?
And Eugene's plan was... Shoot all the zombies?

I assume that once the walkers were killed inside the building, enough ot Negan's people got out and were able to kill the snipers.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: 11B4V on December 10, 2017, 09:19:21 PM
This show is a pile
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on December 11, 2017, 07:45:20 AM
What was Eugene's escape plan? Did they ever say? Whatever it was it worked really well. Kinda made the first five episodes pointless.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Zoupa on December 11, 2017, 03:51:08 PM
You know how in season 2, when they escaped the farm, and mostly in season 4 when they escaped the prison, it took the group days/weeks to find each other again?

How the fuck are the Saviors able to bust out of the sanctuary, rally hundreds of soldiers even though the first 7 episodes show us how all their outposts are destroyed, and mount a 3 pronged attack, simultaneously, on all 3 communities?

How do they even know that the Hilltop group would be on that road? Why don't they at least capture or kill Maggie?

This shit makes no fucking sense. The writing has really went to shit. Oh and good thing Rick went to the trash people and spent like 3 episodes there. Then they bail in the first 5 minutes and aren't seen again. Jesus Christ what a mess. I'm not even touching the Carl dying thing, it's even dumber. Yeah guys, let's have him die from an off-screen bite to random walkers he met in the forest. Sounds like a super cool way to go out, the kid's only been with us for half his life, no biggie. Oh he just bought a house in Georgia and is applying to colleges in the area? Oh we told him at the beginning of the season we wanted him for at least another 3 years minimum? Lol yeah fuck that. Let's just kill him for the shock value. What's that you say? How can Rick go on, it'd be out of character for him not to lose his shit and go on a murdering rampage? Who cares dude. People will keep watching anyways.

AMC: "We are trying to do 20 years of the Walking Dead!"

-The Walking Dead kills Carl-

Narrator: They did not do 20 years.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on December 11, 2017, 04:25:01 PM
Letting Maggie go doesn't make sense. Neagan specifically said he wanted Rick, The Widow and the King.

And yeah, escaping and then co-ordinating a massive three-pronged attack defies belief (in a show where I can believe dead people can walk and get hungry). But I wish they explained the escape better...maybe we'll get a flashback next episode.

There has to be something to CArl's death....I wonder if they're gonna weaponize him...but wait the writers did that with Sasha alredy.

Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: 11B4V on December 11, 2017, 06:31:58 PM
Quote from: Zoupa on December 11, 2017, 03:51:08 PM
You know how in season 2, when they escaped the farm, and mostly in season 4 when they escaped the prison, it took the group days/weeks to find each other again?

How the fuck are the Saviors able to bust out of the sanctuary, rally hundreds of soldiers even though the first 7 episodes show us how all their outposts are destroyed, and mount a 3 pronged attack, simultaneously, on all 3 communities?

How do they even know that the Hilltop group would be on that road? Why don't they at least capture or kill Maggie?

This shit makes no fucking sense. The writing has really went to shit. Oh and good thing Rick went to the trash people and spent like 3 episodes there. Then they bail in the first 5 minutes and aren't seen again. Jesus Christ what a mess. I'm not even touching the Carl dying thing, it's even dumber. Yeah guys, let's have him die from an off-screen bite to random walkers he met in the forest. Sounds like a super cool way to go out, the kid's only been with us for half his life, no biggie. Oh he just bought a house in Georgia and is applying to colleges in the area? Oh we told him at the beginning of the season we wanted him for at least another 3 years minimum? Lol yeah fuck that. Let's just kill him for the shock value. What's that you say? How can Rick go on, it'd be out of character for him not to lose his shit and go on a murdering rampage? Who cares dude. People will keep watching anyways.

AMC: "We are trying to do 20 years of the Walking Dead!"

-The Walking Dead kills Carl-

Narrator: They did not do 20 years.

Wholeheartedly agree with this.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josquius on December 12, 2017, 01:28:47 AM
Quote from: Josephus on December 11, 2017, 04:25:01 PM
Letting Maggie go doesn't make sense. Neagan specifically said he wanted Rick, The Widow and the King.

And yeah, escaping and then co-ordinating a massive three-pronged attack defies belief (in a show where I can believe dead people can walk and get hungry). But I wish they explained the escape better...maybe we'll get a flashback next episode.

There has to be something to CArl's death....I wonder if they're gonna weaponize him...but wait the writers did that with Sasha alredy.



He meant Carol no?


But yes. The whole thing is dumb. Saviours pulling extra guys out of nowhere like a video game villain
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Eddie Teach on December 12, 2017, 01:44:53 AM
Carol wasn't a key figure in the uprising and Negan wouldn't have a clue she'd been married.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on March 11, 2019, 08:19:21 AM
Walking Dead is getting stupid.

It always annoyed me in Fear the Walking Dead, that that one character would put on a coat of blood and merge with the herd unharmed. It had been explained in Walking Dead earlier, although they had to literally cover themselves in blood and guts to get away with it.

But now in Walking Dead the Whisperers merely have to wear a Zombie Halloween mask and get away with it. Seems to me like they've found a good loophole. All living humans should carry Zombie masks in their pockets in case of Zombie attack. Problem solved.

Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: viper37 on March 11, 2019, 12:57:08 PM
Quote from: Josephus on March 11, 2019, 08:19:21 AM
Walking Dead is getting stupid.

It always annoyed me in Fear the Walking Dead, that that one character would put on a coat of blood and merge with the herd unharmed. It had been explained in Walking Dead earlier, although they had to literally cover themselves in blood and guts to get away with it.

But now in Walking Dead the Whisperers merely have to wear a Zombie Halloween mask and get away with it. Seems to me like they've found a good loophole. All living humans should carry Zombie masks in their pockets in case of Zombie attack. Problem solved.

They said something about having their scent on them.  Presumably, they cover themselves in blood, don't wash, and the mask is the extra when the herd comes to you.
They whisper, they smell like them, they look like them, they walk like them.  I think it's a combination of everything.

But yeah, lots of it doesn't make much sense.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: crazy canuck on March 11, 2019, 01:56:02 PM
Quote from: viper37 on March 11, 2019, 12:57:08 PM
Quote from: Josephus on March 11, 2019, 08:19:21 AM
Walking Dead is getting stupid.

It always annoyed me in Fear the Walking Dead, that that one character would put on a coat of blood and merge with the herd unharmed. It had been explained in Walking Dead earlier, although they had to literally cover themselves in blood and guts to get away with it.

But now in Walking Dead the Whisperers merely have to wear a Zombie Halloween mask and get away with it. Seems to me like they've found a good loophole. All living humans should carry Zombie masks in their pockets in case of Zombie attack. Problem solved.

They said something about having their scent on them.  Presumably, they cover themselves in blood, don't wash, and the mask is the extra when the herd comes to you.
They whisper, they smell like them, they look like them, they walk like them.  I think it's a combination of everything.

When they were in their camp they were all clean (ie not smeared in blood).  The only thing they did with the dead attacked the camp was put on their masks and start walking like the dead.  The most silly part was when they were returning with the daughter back to their camp, she was completely clean and had no mask, but she still walked along like she was one of the dead.

The dead are not even dangerous anymore.  They are more of a nuisance.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: viper37 on March 11, 2019, 03:19:10 PM
Quote from: crazy canuck on March 11, 2019, 01:56:02 PM
The most silly part was when they were returning with the daughter back to their camp, she was completely clean and had no mask, but she still walked along like she was one of the dead.
that's when she said something about scent.  or they did.  Like walking close to them, she was covered by their scent.

Even if they don't appear covered in blood, something could be left of it.  There's no stream to wash themselves near there.  And walkers don't seem to attack living animals that make no noise.

I don't even know how they could put on walkers mask and not be infected by residual blood.  IIRC, Rick&co covered themselves with raincoats before applying blood and made sure there were no wounds.

I Don't really know and I don't really care.  "Rules" seems to change every year or so.  It's still a good show, but I miss Rick and Neagan.  Mostly Neagan.  Best villain ever.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: KRonn on March 11, 2019, 06:03:14 PM
There always seems to be some group, often and odd one, that shows up. But I guess these Whisperers are in the comic books, and the show follows the comics to some extent. It's not so out of whack though, as people who have little contact with others could digress into any kind of grouping and way of life to survive. But yeah, they do seem to be following too strange a way of living to be sensible for long term survivable. Alpha and Beta have them severely cowed and it probably wasn't so hard to do at first with very desperate people. Probably something like how Neegan welded his group and power together.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on March 12, 2019, 07:01:22 AM
Quote from: viper37 on March 11, 2019, 03:19:10 PM
Quote from: crazy canuck on March 11, 2019, 01:56:02 PM
The most silly part was when they were returning with the daughter back to their camp, she was completely clean and had no mask, but she still walked along like she was one of the dead.
that's when she said something about scent.  or they did.  Like walking close to them, she was covered by their scent.

Yeah but that's bull shit and has never been the case before. You couldn't just walk among them and assume you were covered by their scent. If you remember, earlier, they pretty much had to cover themselves head to toe in blood and guts, and even then it wasn't guaranteed. Remember the episode where Carl lost an eye, I think; the other kid who was so covered in blood and guts, but let out a small whimper and that was enough for the herd to turn on him.
They're bending the rules of the universe too much.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on March 12, 2019, 07:05:17 AM
Quote from: viper37 on March 11, 2019, 03:19:10 PM
Quote from: crazy canuck on March 11, 2019, 01:56:02 PM
The most silly part was when they were returning with the daughter back to their camp, she was completely clean and had no mask, but she still walked along like she was one of the dead.
I Don't really know and I don't really care.  "Rules" seems to change every year or so.  It's still a good show, but I miss Rick and Neagan.  Mostly Neagan.  Best villain ever.

yeah Rick's missed. I think that's the other issue I'm having. One of the appeals was the characters on the show, and watching them survive against the odds. But now there's a lot of new people I'm not as invested in anymore. It's only Carol and Daryll from the original crew left, I believe.

Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: viper37 on March 12, 2019, 09:24:03 AM
Quote from: Josephus on March 12, 2019, 07:01:22 AM
Yeah but that's bull shit and has never been the case before. You couldn't just walk among them and assume you were covered by their scent.
She is walking with her band surrounding her.  I assumed their scent covered her from the other walkers.

Quote
If you remember, earlier, they pretty much had to cover themselves head to toe in blood and guts, and even then it wasn't guaranteed.
I remember that.  As soon as there was some rain, they were fucked.

Quote
Remember the episode where Carl lost an eye, I think; the other kid who was so covered in blood and guts, but let out a small whimper and that was enough for the herd to turn on him.
I don't remember that part. I mean, I remember Carl losing an eye, but not much beyond that.

Quote
They're bending the rules of the universe too much.
tottally.  they're writing a post-apocalyptic show with zombies and not much else now.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: KRonn on March 12, 2019, 07:17:40 PM
Quote from: Josephus on March 12, 2019, 07:05:17 AM
Quote from: viper37 on March 11, 2019, 03:19:10 PM
Quote from: crazy canuck on March 11, 2019, 01:56:02 PM
The most silly part was when they were returning with the daughter back to their camp, she was completely clean and had no mask, but she still walked along like she was one of the dead.
I Don't really know and I don't really care.  "Rules" seems to change every year or so.  It's still a good show, but I miss Rick and Neagan.  Mostly Neagan.  Best villain ever.

yeah Rick's missed. I think that's the other issue I'm having. One of the appeals was the characters on the show, and watching them survive against the odds. But now there's a lot of new people I'm not as invested in anymore. It's only Carol and Daryll from the original crew left, I believe.

Rick is missed but I think the show was moving beyond his character, changing, not sure. His going was a shocker but his work as leader was changing so much. However one thing that gets me is that they kill off some excellent and well liked fan favorites, such as Jesus. He had a much shorter time than Rick and was just coming into his own. That came as a big surprise as he was one of the main leaders, especially after Rick was gone. That all said though, the show is and will remain a huge favorite with me.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: The Minsky Moment on March 12, 2019, 07:29:27 PM
Zombie flicks have never been about zombies - it's always been social commentary of some kind.  That's Romero's legacy and Walking Dead is very much in the Romero tradition even if the premise is built a bit differently.  The problem with this whispering plot is not that it messes up the internal consistency of the lore, it's just not a very compelling plot line.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: The Minsky Moment on March 12, 2019, 07:31:07 PM
Also it's appears that the crossbow totin' mountain man guy - who IIRC is not in the comics - is filling the Rick role while the blacksmith kid is filling in for Carl.  Always smart for a TV show to build in extra characters like that.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Solmyr on March 14, 2019, 11:50:59 AM
Quote from: KRonn on March 12, 2019, 07:17:40 PM
Rick is missed but I think the show was moving beyond his character, changing, not sure. His going was a shocker but his work as leader was changing so much. However one thing that gets me is that they kill off some excellent and well liked fan favorites, such as Jesus. He had a much shorter time than Rick and was just coming into his own. That came as a big surprise as he was one of the main leaders, especially after Rick was gone. That all said though, the show is and will remain a huge favorite with me.

Jesus's actor wanted to quit the show, so they killed him off.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Valmy on March 14, 2019, 11:53:50 AM
Was he sacrificed to redeem the show's sins?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on March 14, 2019, 12:00:25 PM
Quote from: Solmyr on March 14, 2019, 11:50:59 AM
Quote from: KRonn on March 12, 2019, 07:17:40 PM
Rick is missed but I think the show was moving beyond his character, changing, not sure. His going was a shocker but his work as leader was changing so much. However one thing that gets me is that they kill off some excellent and well liked fan favorites, such as Jesus. He had a much shorter time than Rick and was just coming into his own. That came as a big surprise as he was one of the main leaders, especially after Rick was gone. That all said though, the show is and will remain a huge favorite with me.

Jesus's actor wanted to quit the show, so they killed him off.

Same with Maggie.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: crazy canuck on March 14, 2019, 12:02:13 PM
Quote from: Josephus on March 14, 2019, 12:00:25 PM
Quote from: Solmyr on March 14, 2019, 11:50:59 AM
Quote from: KRonn on March 12, 2019, 07:17:40 PM
Rick is missed but I think the show was moving beyond his character, changing, not sure. His going was a shocker but his work as leader was changing so much. However one thing that gets me is that they kill off some excellent and well liked fan favorites, such as Jesus. He had a much shorter time than Rick and was just coming into his own. That came as a big surprise as he was one of the main leaders, especially after Rick was gone. That all said though, the show is and will remain a huge favorite with me.

Jesus's actor wanted to quit the show, so they killed him off.

Same with Maggie.

Well, she was having a pay dispute with them.  Why did Jesus want to leave?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Solmyr on March 15, 2019, 02:04:08 AM
Quote from: crazy canuck on March 14, 2019, 12:02:13 PM
Quote from: Josephus on March 14, 2019, 12:00:25 PM
Quote from: Solmyr on March 14, 2019, 11:50:59 AM
Quote from: KRonn on March 12, 2019, 07:17:40 PM
Rick is missed but I think the show was moving beyond his character, changing, not sure. His going was a shocker but his work as leader was changing so much. However one thing that gets me is that they kill off some excellent and well liked fan favorites, such as Jesus. He had a much shorter time than Rick and was just coming into his own. That came as a big surprise as he was one of the main leaders, especially after Rick was gone. That all said though, the show is and will remain a huge favorite with me.

Jesus's actor wanted to quit the show, so they killed him off.

Same with Maggie.

Well, she was having a pay dispute with them.  Why did Jesus want to leave?

He wasn't happy with his character being so underdeveloped and underused.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: KRonn on March 15, 2019, 09:25:49 AM
I didn't realize Maggie had left, though I knew she had "gone on a journey" or something. Jesus seemed to be finally coming into his own, the character doing well, having room to expand. It's curious that he still felt underused.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on March 15, 2019, 10:24:11 AM
Quote from: KRonn on March 15, 2019, 09:25:49 AM
I didn't realize Maggie had left, though I knew she had "gone on a journey" or something. Jesus seemed to be finally coming into his own, the character doing well, having room to expand. It's curious that he still felt underused.

Yeah she had a contract dispute. I think the show runners were so pissed off they didn't even give her a noble death.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: viper37 on March 15, 2019, 10:39:37 AM
I thought she was supposed to come back for a few episodes?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: crazy canuck on March 15, 2019, 10:52:22 AM
Quote from: viper37 on March 15, 2019, 10:39:37 AM
I thought she was supposed to come back for a few episodes?

No, last season she was in only a few episodes because of the pay dispute.  She has a different show now.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: KRonn on March 15, 2019, 06:20:49 PM
Yeah, I saw that she's on another show "Whiskey Cavalier".
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Admiral Yi on March 15, 2019, 09:41:42 PM
Never fuck with the Jesus.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: 11B4V on March 17, 2019, 08:42:56 PM
WTF with this latest episode. :huh:
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: viper37 on March 18, 2019, 07:46:37 AM
It was awful.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Zoupa on March 18, 2019, 01:50:57 PM
It was awful in a good way.

Look at the flowers Lizzie.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: KRonn on March 18, 2019, 08:37:25 PM
Tough, rugged episode but in this dystopian world very little surprises me anymore.  One of the producers, Denise Huth, was on the Talking Dead show right after the episode. She explained how they chose to show as little as possible of the kids being killed.

Michonne suffered a huge betrayal by a good friend from the pre-dead world. We saw what that friend did with those kids, how she trained them to be so nasty. We finally see the reason Michonne didn't want to allow any new people into Alexandria, wanted to keep separate from the other villages. But it looks like now she's coming out of it, changing her outlook on things.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Solmyr on March 19, 2019, 04:34:18 AM
It was good. Great acting from Michonne's and Judith's actors (the latter may be one of the best child actors around at the moment).
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: crazy canuck on March 19, 2019, 10:44:17 AM
Quote from: viper37 on March 18, 2019, 07:46:37 AM
It was awful.

It was filling in some of the gap of what occurred between the two seasons and explained why Michonne was turning into, but thankfully turned away from becoming, an isolationist dictator.  There were several time shifts that occurred which may have been confusing but I thought it was one of the better episodes they have had recently.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: crazy canuck on March 19, 2019, 10:44:49 AM
Quote from: Solmyr on March 19, 2019, 04:34:18 AM
It was good. Great acting from Michonne's and Judith's actors (the latter may be one of the best child actors around at the moment).

Agreed, that little girl can act!
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on March 19, 2019, 03:06:03 PM
It was a necessary episode to explain why Michone and Daryll, but especially Michone, are the way they are.And yes, that little girl sure can act. If she were a stock I'd invest heavily in her.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: viper37 on March 19, 2019, 09:47:43 PM
Quote from: crazy canuck on March 19, 2019, 10:44:49 AM
Quote from: Solmyr on March 19, 2019, 04:34:18 AM
It was good. Great acting from Michonne's and Judith's actors (the latter may be one of the best child actors around at the moment).

Agreed, that little girl can act!
I said so the first time I saw her making an entrance Last of the Mohicans style ;)
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on March 24, 2019, 10:03:15 PM
They certainly like to cull the cast off this show don't they.

An unexpected ending to an otherwise terrible, and extremely unbelievable episode.

I know, I know, it's a show about dead people that walk and chew on living people. I'm supposed to throw believability out the window but...

... are we expected to believe that Alpha skinned that young pretty woman, put her face on her own seamlessly and was able to get away with it. Seriously? What did she do? Perform a skin graft?

Come on.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: crazy canuck on March 25, 2019, 10:08:27 AM
She didnt put her face on.  She put her hair on, because Alpha is bald and would easily be recognized.

edit: as for the cast culling - yeah, lets just casually kill off a bunch of characters we spent a few seasons developing because, you know, pay roll.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: viper37 on March 25, 2019, 10:21:42 AM
I don't mind the culling.

I don't mind Alpha wearing a wig.

I do mind how they are going to eliminate that threat.

One episode left, I guess it will be resolved next year.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on March 25, 2019, 11:26:39 AM
yeah, I take my rant back.

I thought she put the face on; but it was just the hair. I stand corrected. :blush:
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on March 25, 2019, 11:29:04 AM
Quote from: crazy canuck on March 25, 2019, 10:08:27 AM
She didnt put her face on.  She put her hair on, because Alpha is bald and would easily be recognized.

edit: as for the cast culling - yeah, lets just casually kill off a bunch of characters we spent a few seasons developing because, you know, pay roll.

thing is since the big  shocking deaths of...um, Japanese guy and red hair, I'm no longer shocked by deaths. Partly because i'm no longer invested in the characters. I mean, really, they were all supporting characters except for the one. (Sorry, I suck at remembering names.) And, of course, we've become desensitized.

REally the only characters I'm vested in are CArol and Daryll.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: crazy canuck on March 25, 2019, 01:57:41 PM
Quote from: Josephus on March 25, 2019, 11:29:04 AM
REally the only characters I'm vested in are CArol and Daryll.

Same.  i want to see bad ass Carol back though.  Domestic bliss does not fit too well with her story arc.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: viper37 on March 25, 2019, 02:37:21 PM
Quote from: crazy canuck on March 25, 2019, 01:57:41 PM
Quote from: Josephus on March 25, 2019, 11:29:04 AM
REally the only characters I'm vested in are CArol and Daryll.

Same.  i want to see bad ass Carol back though.  Domestic bliss does not fit too well with her story arc.
she did put a few guys on fire in the first episode of this season.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on March 26, 2019, 06:36:54 AM
Yeah she put a few guys on fire cause they threatened her son. Imagine what she's gonna do now ...
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: viper37 on March 26, 2019, 01:47:03 PM
Quote from: Josephus on March 26, 2019, 06:36:54 AM
Yeah she put a few guys on fire cause they threatened her son. Imagine what she's gonna do now ...
according to the preview, they will finally have a winter and will move into the bad guys territory.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Zoupa on March 27, 2019, 01:39:51 PM
Felt bad for Enid. JSS  :(
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on March 27, 2019, 04:10:12 PM
Quote from: Zoupa on March 27, 2019, 01:39:51 PM
Felt bad for Enid. JSS  :(

yeah she was the only character i'll miss; but they've been using her very sparingly of late.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: viper37 on March 27, 2019, 11:35:00 PM
seems there wasn't much thought placed on who was going to die.
https://www.thisisinsider.com/the-walking-dead-katelyn-nacon-interview-2019-3 (https://www.thisisinsider.com/the-walking-dead-katelyn-nacon-interview-2019-3)
I think this is gonna be my last season.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on February 25, 2020, 08:21:32 AM
Aaaaargh....this show has become irritating.

I've said this before. The writers introduced a thing several seasons ago where covering yourself in some zombie blood can act as a deterrent to zombie bites...kinda like mosquito repellant.

The characters know this. But often refuse to consider this.

If I'm trapped in a cave with a million zombies, and am looking for a way out. First thing to do. Put on some zombie blood. Will make the whole experience easier.

Also, [spoiler]they killed off only two remaining eye candies.[/spoiler]
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: viper37 on February 25, 2020, 04:10:14 PM
this is used to be a very busy thread every Sunday nights...  Oh how the mighty have fallen...

So, Maggie's dead?  Or she never came back?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: The Minsky Moment on February 25, 2020, 04:34:55 PM
Quote from: viper37 on February 25, 2020, 04:10:14 PM
So, Maggie's dead? 

No just her acting career.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on February 26, 2020, 09:22:39 AM
Quote from: The Minsky Moment on February 25, 2020, 04:34:55 PM
Quote from: viper37 on February 25, 2020, 04:10:14 PM
So, Maggie's dead? 

No just her acting career.
:lmfao:
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on February 26, 2020, 09:28:44 AM
Quote from: viper37 on February 25, 2020, 04:10:14 PM
this is used to be a very busy thread every Sunday nights...  Oh how the mighty have fallen...

So, Maggie's dead?  Or she never came back?


It was a great show. It has fallen fast and quickly.

We no longer care about the characters. When Glen and Abraham died we drowned in our sorrows. Now we don't care. The core of the cast is gone. Only Daryl and Carol remain from the originals. (Daryl wasn't even an original). Michone is allegedly leaving this year too. We got introduced to a whole bunch of new characters...but none seem interesting. At end of previous season when a whole bunch of them got their heads spiked, I was like "who were they again?"

They move from one BadAss guy to another. Governor, Neegan, Alpha, but all seem carbon copies of the other, with slight modifications.

It's run its course

Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: crazy canuck on February 26, 2020, 10:23:03 AM
Neegan actually made the case to Alpha that he had been just like her.  I caught that scene while flicking through the episode to see if there was anything interesting.  Nope.  They killed off the two that had the potential of becoming interesting characters.  Even Daryl and Carol have become bland.  I don't even know the names of most of the characters on the show now - not the actors' names, the characters' names.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead spoilers thread
Post by: Josephus on March 24, 2020, 05:13:22 PM
well...looks like the final episode is still in editing phase and won't be completed. So the season won't end for a while. Also, April spinoff has been delayed.