Gotcha!

[Eddie Teach]

This is the worst attention whoring thread ever.

You've clearly missed all my attention whoring threads. 

[LaCroix]

Eh, I don't think Raz is really whining about the insults, he just wants to know if others think there's merit to them.

nah, i don't mean this thread. i mean when he whined when grumbler insulted him

[Eddie Teach]

Ah, I've stopped paying attention to it when grumbler starts bullying somebody.

[Razgovory]

Eh, I don't think Raz is really whining about the insults, he just wants to know if others think there's merit to them.

nah, i don't mean this thread. i mean when he whined when grumbler insulted him

What did Grumbler call me?  He's always name calling,  I bring attention to it because he's always the first to accuse someone else of resorting to Ad Hominem.  I actually like Grumbler.  When he's not being an ass, he can provides some unique insights and does have a vast store of military and historical knowledge.  Still, he can be tiring and his current fit of ignoring me suits me fine.  The only person I can't really stand is Grallon someone I have a hard time finding positive things to say about.  I mock pretty much everyone here, but usually there's no real malice in it.  I mocked CdM once, then he banned me.  So I stopped that.  Marty banned me when he was a mod for mocking him, but he's no longer a mod so I'm free to do as I will.  Besides, I have a hard time believing that the barbs or criticisms from some loser on the net will bother someone overmuch.


Eddie is right about the purpose of this thread.  I genuinely didn't understand what Yi was going on about.  I don't always "get" things.  Berkut and I had a very heated discussion once because I misunderstood something he wrote.  It wasn't until much later when I rethought it, did I understood what he meant.  I did kinda feel embarrassed about that.

[Ideologue]

Grallon's fun because he's the Frenchest person on the forum.

[Razgovory]

Grallon's fun because he's the Frenchest person on the forum.

I think of Zoupa as the Frenchyiest person here.  And Zoups is fine.

[LaCroix]

What did Grumbler call me?  He's always name calling,  I bring attention to it because he's always the first to accuse someone else of resorting to Ad Hominem.

you seem to have a not horrible memory of when posters "attack you," so you ought to remember the post. if you don't, i'm too lazy to bring it up, so there we are. either way, in regard to this whole thread, i'll ask: since you yourself claim to be not so intelligent, why do you argue with posters who make very smart points? shouldn't your own humility allow you to concede every point made?

[Eddie Teach]

He didn't say he was a fucking moron who didn't understand that smart people are wrong sometimes too.

[LaCroix]

He didn't say he was a fucking moron who didn't understand that smart people are wrong sometimes too.

he did say he was the least intelligent person on this board, bar martinus (which i have doubts of, but that's another argument). that is quite a strong statement, and when we've quality posters such as yis around, it makes one wonder

[Razgovory]

Too dumb to know better, I reckon.  If I was smarter I suppose I would recognize the smartness of their posts.  As it is I merely an Idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.

  Grumbler has called me all sorts of things.  So you would have to be more specific with "Grumbler insulted you once".  That's like saying "Slargos said something racist once".

[Jaron]

Even though grumbler is a proper noun, it is not to be capitalized, even at the beginning of a sentence.

[LaCroix]

Grumbler has called me all sorts of things.  So you would have to be more specific with "Grumbler insulted you once".  That's like saying "Slargos said something racist once".

nope. i could be wrong, since i don't speak for grumbler, but i don't think he insults many posters too frequently. at least, not that i've seen. i do know that rather recently he posted a comment about you, and you responded that you preferred that he not randomly insult you. it struck me as rather hypocritical, since isn't that what you do with slargos, martinus?

[Ideologue]

Grallon's fun because he's the Frenchest person on the forum.

I think of Zoupa as the Frenchyiest person here.  And Zoups is fine.

Yeah, right.  Zoupa might have part-time metropolitanness in his favor, but where's the nihilism?  The defeatism?  The dead-end technocrat's job?  The paradoxical hatred of Muslims and the United States?

[Razgovory]

Oh, that was him ignoring me and not ignoring me.  He goes through phases of that.  I asked that if he was going to ignore me, please do so consistently, and not to simply belittle me and then when I respond say he's now ignoring me.  That's a bit annoying.  In particular he had been attacking every argument I made, and I was curious what his position on the subject was (I think it concerned Ron Paul).  It was right about then he decided he was going to ignore me.  That suited me fine, since he was starting to annoy me.  I found it amusing but not really insulting.  Yi was a bit different, since I didn't know what he was on about.  Yi has a his own debating method which involves asking lots of questions but makes it difficult to discern what he's supporting or not.  In fact, with Yi I often use his method to debate him.  Constantly asking questions about underlying assumptions.

[Razgovory]

Grallon's fun because he's the Frenchest person on the forum.

I think of Zoupa as the Frenchyiest person here.  And Zoups is fine.

Yeah, right.  Zoupa might have part-time metropolitanness in his favor, but where's the nihilism?  The defeatism?  The dead-end technocrat's job?  The paradoxical hatred of Muslims and the United States?

I dislike the Nihilism.  Surely that isn't a major facet of French Culture?