What does a TRUMP presidency look like?

[Habbaku]

It's hilarious that this is the POTUS Americans want to have.

Not the majority of Americans.

But the better organised or the most easily manipulated ones won, take you pick.

Alternatively the less well organised or most individualistic ones lost.

The more geographically concentrated ones in specific, tactically important areas.

[mongers]

It's hilarious that this is the POTUS Americans want to have.

Not the majority of Americans.

But the better organised or the most easily manipulated ones won, take you pick.

Alternatively the less well organised or most individualistic ones lost.

The more geographically concentrated ones in specific, tactically important areas.

How significant was the 'anyone but Hilary crowd', both in numbers turning out and those simply not voting for a democrat or woman.


As an aside, they sure did strike gold with what they got.

[The Brain]

It's hilarious that this is the POTUS Americans want to have.

I bet you have a parliament. 

But not Parliament.

[dps]

It's hilarious that this is the POTUS Americans want to have.

Not the majority of Americans.

But the better organised or the most easily manipulated ones won, take you pick.

Alternatively the less well organised or most individualistic ones lost.

The more geographically concentrated ones in specific, tactically important areas.

How significant was the 'anyone but Hilary crowd', both in numbers turning out and those simply not voting for a democrat or woman.

The numbers of those who simply won't vote for a Democrat (or who simply won't vote for a Republican, for that matter) are fairly stable, though I don't know if their turnout is.  I'm sure that simple sexism played a part, though not to the extent Seedy would have you believe.  I don't really know how big the "anyone but Hilary" crowd was, or how much they turned out, but I'd say they were smaller than the "anyone but Trump" crowd.

[Legbiter]

Now that Russian collusion, after one year of intense study, has proven to be a total hoax on the American public, the Democrats and their lapdogs, the Fake News Mainstream Media, are taking out the old Ronald Reagan playbook and screaming mental stability and intelligence.........Actually, throughout my life, my two greatest assets have been mental stability and being, like, really smart. Crooked Hillary Clinton also played these cards very hard and, as everyone knows, went down in flames. I went from VERY successful businessman, to top T.V. Star.........to President of the United States (on my first try). I think that would qualify as not smart, but genius....and a very stable genius at that!

The last part really ties the whole thing together. 

[Sophie Scholl]

How significant was the 'anyone but Hilary crowd', both in numbers turning out and those simply not voting for a democrat or woman.


As an aside, they sure did strike gold with what they got.

One of the big problems, to my mind, is that by running Hillary instead of any other candidate, the Republicans were able to use the ghost of Bill Clinton and the warchest of Hillary hate and possible negative information they'd been building since the 2008 primary campaign or before against her.  Add in that she actually held positions of power that required making tough choices that resulted in real world implications and you've got a candidate that could do the impossible: lose to Donald Trump.  If any almost other candidate had been run by the Democrats, male or female, I think they would have won.  Hillary was most definitely qualified, but she also had the most Republican hate baggage to drag her campaign down.

[mongers]

It's hilarious that this is the POTUS Americans want to have.

Not the majority of Americans.

But the better organised or the most easily manipulated ones won, take you pick.

Alternatively the less well organised or most individualistic ones lost.

The more geographically concentrated ones in specific, tactically important areas.

How significant was the 'anyone but Hilary crowd', both in numbers turning out and those simply not voting for a democrat or woman.

The numbers of those who simply won't vote for a Democrat (or who simply won't vote for a Republican, for that matter) are fairly stable, though I don't know if their turnout is.  I'm sure that simple sexism played a part, though not to the extent Seedy would have you believe.  I don't really know how big the "anyone but Hilary" crowd was, or how much they turned out, but I'd say they were smaller than the "anyone but Trump" crowd.

Thanks for that.

[mongers]

How significant was the 'anyone but Hilary crowd', both in numbers turning out and those simply not voting for a democrat or woman.


As an aside, they sure did strike gold with what they got.

One of the big problems, to my mind, is that by running Hillary instead of any other candidate, the Republicans were able to use the ghost of Bill Clinton and the warchest of Hillary hate and possible negative information they'd been building since the 2008 primary campaign or before against her.  Add in that she actually held positions of power that required making tough choices that resulted in real world implications and you've got a candidate that could do the impossible: lose to Donald Trump.  If any almost other candidate had been run by the Democrats, male or female, I think they would have won.  Hillary was most definitely qualified, but she also had the most Republican hate baggage to drag her campaign down.

Thanks, I guess much of the answer lies with the mix you've and dps has described.

Also I think you're right that anyone but Hilary running for Democrats would have dumped Trump.

[garbon]

About time we got to the Bernie myth again.

On a different note, really the name he picked is Sloppy Steve?

[11B4V]

About time we got to the Bernie myth again.

On a different note, really the name he picked is Sloppy Steve?

I think King called him a disheveled drunk.

[dps]

Also I think you're right that anyone but Hilary running for Democrats would have dumped Trump.

To be honest, I don't think Bernie would have.

At any rate, keep in mind that almost all of us thought that there was no way Trump would even win the Republican nomination.  We kept waiting for him to implode or the voters to come to their senses, but it never happened.

[mongers]

I'm glad Trump now knows the contempt, that most people close to him, hold him in.

Though not such a good situation for the rest of us.

[mongers]

Also I think you're right that anyone but Hilary running for Democrats would have dumped Trump.

To be honest, I don't think Bernie would have.

At any rate, keep in mind that almost all of us thought that there was no way Trump would even win the Republican nomination.  We kept waiting for him to implode or the voters to come to their senses, but it never happened.

Which raise the question, what would have been the odds in a Bernie-Trump race?

[dps]

Also I think you're right that anyone but Hilary running for Democrats would have dumped Trump.

To be honest, I don't think Bernie would have.

At any rate, keep in mind that almost all of us thought that there was no way Trump would even win the Republican nomination.  We kept waiting for him to implode or the voters to come to their senses, but it never happened.

Which raise the question, what would have been the odds in a Bernie-Trump race?

I don't know;  how do you handicap a 'tard fight?

[Razgovory]

About time we got to the Bernie myth again.

On a different note, really the name he picked is Sloppy Steve?

We have an known and an unknown.  We know Clinton loses in an Election against Trump.  We honestly don't know how Bernie would do.