Brexit and the waning days of the United Kingdom

Started by Josquius, February 20, 2016, 07:46:34 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

How would you vote on Britain remaining in the EU?

British- Remain
12 (12%)
British - Leave
7 (7%)
Other European - Remain
21 (21%)
Other European - Leave
6 (6%)
ROTW - Remain
34 (34%)
ROTW - Leave
20 (20%)

Total Members Voted: 98

Valmy

In the event of no-deal is the British Army ready to re-deploy in Northern Ireland?
Quote"This is a Russian warship. I propose you lay down arms and surrender to avoid bloodshed & unnecessary victims. Otherwise, you'll be bombed."

Zmiinyi defenders: "Russian warship, go fuck yourself."

Valmy

Quote from: Liep on March 13, 2019, 02:33:19 PM
What does the no no-deal deal mean? How can the British parliament guarantee that there won't be a no-deal? If the EU doesn't agree to an extension beyond the election and May can't get a deal through in time, then there's only cancelling Brexit left, no?

I mean...logically. And maybe that is why the vote was so close.
Quote"This is a Russian warship. I propose you lay down arms and surrender to avoid bloodshed & unnecessary victims. Otherwise, you'll be bombed."

Zmiinyi defenders: "Russian warship, go fuck yourself."

The Minsky Moment

Quote from: Valmy on March 13, 2019, 02:32:55 PM
Parliament voted to reject a no-deal 312-308. Fucking 312-308? WTF is wrong with that country?

Well there is no way a delay is winning so...

Like I said, Cordorcet Paradox.
The purpose of studying economics is not to acquire a set of ready-made answers to economic questions, but to learn how to avoid being deceived by economists.
--Joan Robinson

Syt

This starts to feel like a Monty Python improv gone horribly wrong and lasting waaaay too long.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein's brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops.
—Stephen Jay Gould

Proud owner of 42 Zoupa Points.

The Minsky Moment

Quote from: Zanza on March 13, 2019, 01:25:14 PM
There are reports that some Brexiteers are actively lobbying Polish, Hungarian and Italian governments to veto an Article 50 extension.

Does Britain still use drawing and quartering as a penalty for treason?
The purpose of studying economics is not to acquire a set of ready-made answers to economic questions, but to learn how to avoid being deceived by economists.
--Joan Robinson

mongers

I'm coming around to the idea that there should be a 2nd referendum.

But it has to be in two parts, firstly Leave or Stay*. Then if the elector has chosen leave he/she gets a 2nd ballot to select May's deal (or whatever parliament agrees with EU_) or hard Brexit.


* people voting for stay don't get a 2nd ballot paper with the deal/no deal brexit options. 
"We have it in our power to begin the world over again"

PJL

The 'no deal' votes are meaningless since no deal is still the default option. It's probably the only thing the EU and Jacob Rees-Mogg agree on right now.

The Minsky Moment

Quote from: mongers on March 13, 2019, 02:47:39 PM
I'm coming around to the idea that there should be a 2nd referendum.

But it has to be in two parts, firstly Leave or Stay*. Then if the elector has chosen leave he/she gets a 2nd ballot to select May's deal (or whatever parliament agrees with EU_) or hard Brexit.


* people voting for stay don't get a 2nd ballot paper with the deal/no deal brexit options.

I coming around to the opinion that Britain should be colonized by another power with superior governance and working institutions, then run as a protectorate for a suitable period of time and then granted independence only when it is ready to handle the hard responsibilities of self-government.
The purpose of studying economics is not to acquire a set of ready-made answers to economic questions, but to learn how to avoid being deceived by economists.
--Joan Robinson

mongers

Quote from: The Minsky Moment on March 13, 2019, 02:50:40 PM
Quote from: mongers on March 13, 2019, 02:47:39 PM
I'm coming around to the idea that there should be a 2nd referendum.

But it has to be in two parts, firstly Leave or Stay*. Then if the elector has chosen leave he/she gets a 2nd ballot to select May's deal (or whatever parliament agrees with EU_) or hard Brexit.


* people voting for stay don't get a 2nd ballot paper with the deal/no deal brexit options.

I coming around to the opinion that Britain should be colonized by another power with superior governance and working institutions, then run as a protectorate for a suitable period of time and then granted independence only when it is ready to handle the hard responsibilities of self-government.

Like with Iraq?  ;)
"We have it in our power to begin the world over again"

Tamas

Quote from: Valmy on March 13, 2019, 02:32:55 PM
Parliament voted to reject a no-deal 312-308. Fucking 312-308? WTF is wrong with that country?

Well there is no way a delay is winning so...

No that vote was to amend the motion so that with the main motion they'd rule out no-deal forever, not just on the 29th of March as per the original amendment.

Now the main -amended- motion has been voted on with a bigger majority than that, to reject no-deal.

As I understand, May just offered 3 options:
-no deal
-short extension plus her deal
-long extension plus EU Parliament elections plus who knows what

Tamas

And neither Hungary nor Poland would veto an A50 extension. The grandkids of their core voters all live in the UK :P

The Larch

It is fucking crazy that almost half of parliament want a No Deal Brexit outright. It was supposed to be a fringe option and now it's the most plausible outcome.

celedhring

From The Guardian:

Quote
May promised MPs a free vote, but the motion was carefully worded, with the final sentence stating that, "leaving without a deal remains the default in UK and EU law unless this house and the EU ratify an agreement".

However, MPs voted by 312 to 308 to support a backbench amendment which struck out that last phrase so as to rule out a no-deal exit altogether.

Wait, so stricking that phrase out will somehow magically prevent a no-deal? It was stating a fact.  :huh:

The Brain

UK politicians are morans.
Women want me. Men want to be with me.

Tamas

QuoteThe government motion tabled for tomorrow sets next Wednesday as the deadline for MPs to pass a Brexit deal. It says, if a deal is passed by then, the government will seek an extension of article 50 until 30 June. But if the deal is not passed by then, then the government will need a longer extension, requiring the UK to take part in European elections, the motion says.


So in effect nothing has changed. May is still pushing her deal, except next time they'll vote on it 9 days before leaving.