News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

Scottish Independence

Started by Sheilbh, September 05, 2014, 04:20:20 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

How will Scotland vote on independence?

Yes (I'd also vote yes)
16 (24.2%)
Yes (I'd vote no)
8 (12.1%)
No (I'd vote yes)
4 (6.1%)
No (I'd also vote no)
38 (57.6%)

Total Members Voted: 64

Josquius

#285
The country would remain the uk.
It is a well established brand with meaning beyond when it was first invented. Most countries have names that aren't particularly relevant to the modern country.
██████
██████
██████

Jacob

I wonder what would happen to the flag. I've seen some pretty ghastly suggestions.

garbon

Quote from: Jacob on September 12, 2014, 11:37:22 AM
I wonder what would happen to the flag. I've seen some pretty ghastly suggestions.

If I were a citizen, I'd vote to just keep it as is.
"I've never been quite sure what the point of a eunuch is, if truth be told. It seems to me they're only men with the useful bits cut off."
I drank because I wanted to drown my sorrows, but now the damned things have learned to swim.

garbon

Quote from: Tyr on September 12, 2014, 11:33:23 AM
Most countries have names that aren't particularly relevant to the modern country.

Some examples?
"I've never been quite sure what the point of a eunuch is, if truth be told. It seems to me they're only men with the useful bits cut off."
I drank because I wanted to drown my sorrows, but now the damned things have learned to swim.

Josquius

Quote from: garbon on September 12, 2014, 11:41:04 AM
Quote from: Tyr on September 12, 2014, 11:33:23 AM
Most countries have names that aren't particularly relevant to the modern country.

Some examples?

Belgium . There's no celts there.
China. It's not in the centre of anything.
Bolivia. Bolivar is dead. And was hardly particular to Bolivia.
██████
██████
██████

Jacob

Quote from: garbon on September 12, 2014, 11:40:24 AM
Quote from: Jacob on September 12, 2014, 11:37:22 AM
I wonder what would happen to the flag. I've seen some pretty ghastly suggestions.

If I were a citizen, I'd vote to just keep it as is.

The St. Andrew's Cross would bother me.

Duque de Bragança

Quote from: Tyr on September 12, 2014, 12:02:03 PM
Quote from: garbon on September 12, 2014, 11:41:04 AM
Quote from: Tyr on September 12, 2014, 11:33:23 AM
Most countries have names that aren't particularly relevant to the modern country.

Some examples?

Belgium . There's no celts there.

So Walloons are French-speaking Germanic people as said by Degrelle?  :hmm:

Barrister

Quote from: Tyr on September 12, 2014, 12:02:03 PM
Quote from: garbon on September 12, 2014, 11:41:04 AM
Quote from: Tyr on September 12, 2014, 11:33:23 AM
Most countries have names that aren't particularly relevant to the modern country.

Some examples?

Belgium . There's no celts there.
China. It's not in the centre of anything.
Bolivia. Bolivar is dead. And was hardly particular to Bolivia.

Canada - from the Iroquois word for village -kanata.
Posts here are my own private opinions.  I do not speak for my employer.

Eddie Teach

Chad- sounds like a fellow who belongs in a country club with a golf course and rich white people, not one with Sudan and Mali.
To sleep, perchance to dream. But in that sleep of death, what dreams may come?

derspiess

Quote from: garbon on September 12, 2014, 11:40:24 AM
Quote from: Jacob on September 12, 2014, 11:37:22 AM
I wonder what would happen to the flag. I've seen some pretty ghastly suggestions.

If I were a citizen, I'd vote to just keep it as is.

I'd keep it as is-- too cool of an icon to see it go.  If it had to change to reflect reality I'd go for the one design that had the red criss-cross and then a background split with the upper half white and lower half green.
"If you can play a guitar and harmonica at the same time, like Bob Dylan or Neil Young, you're a genius. But make that extra bit of effort and strap some cymbals to your knees, suddenly people want to get the hell away from you."  --Rich Hall

garbon

Quote from: Barrister on September 12, 2014, 12:10:40 PM
Quote from: Tyr on September 12, 2014, 12:02:03 PM
Quote from: garbon on September 12, 2014, 11:41:04 AM
Quote from: Tyr on September 12, 2014, 11:33:23 AM
Most countries have names that aren't particularly relevant to the modern country.

Some examples?

Belgium . There's no celts there.
China. It's not in the centre of anything.
Bolivia. Bolivar is dead. And was hardly particular to Bolivia.

Canada - from the Iroquois word for village -kanata.

I don't think I'd really consider those to be names not relevant to their given countries, anymore so than saying my name isn't relevant to me as I'm not a narrow or strait. :D
"I've never been quite sure what the point of a eunuch is, if truth be told. It seems to me they're only men with the useful bits cut off."
I drank because I wanted to drown my sorrows, but now the damned things have learned to swim.

MadImmortalMan

Quote from: Reuters
Capital flows out of UK before Scots vote on independence, report shows
Fri, Sep 12 14:18 PM BST

By Jamie McGeever

LONDON, Sept 12 (Reuters) - Investors pulled $27 billion out of UK financial assets last month - the biggest capital outflow since the Lehman crisis in 2008 - as concern mounted about the economic and financial consequences if Scotland left the UK, a report showed on Friday.

People in Scotland will vote in a referendum on independence on Sept 18, and the decision is on a knife edge after the pro-independence campaign overcame a 20-point deficit in the polls since the start of August. The most recent ICM/Gaurdian poll released on Friday put the gap at just 51 percent intending to vote "No" to 49 percent in favour of "Yes".

Data compiled by London-based consultancy CrossBorder Capital said financial outflows from the UK totaled $27 billion in August, compared with inflows of $8.9 billion the same month last year.

That's the biggest monthly outflow since the white heat of the financial crisis in 2008, when giant U.S. bank Lehman Brothers went bust. It exceeded the selling of UK assets seen around the 2010 general election, when an inconclusive result led to several days of uncertainty.

"Sterling outflows have been an issue since the end of June, but they really gathered pace in August and now look like intensifying again with the possibility of Scottish independence coming to the front of investors' minds,", said Michael Howell, the managing director of CrossBorder Capital, which compiles the index.

The UK outflow was more than double the combined outflow from Germany and Australia. France, the United States, Canada and Japan all attracted net inflows.

Also on Friday, Morgan Stanley said daily equity flow data pointed to "some of the largest UK equity selling on record, demonstrating investor concerns ahead of the Scottish referendum next week."

Concern over the financial, economic and political effects if the UK breaks up has also weighed on sterling, triggering a surge in exchange rate volatility to its highest since the 2010 general election. In addition, selling pressure has mounted as speculation grew that the Bank of England would soon raise interest rates.

Volatility also swept through global markets this summer, a result of the deepening Russia-Ukraine crisis. According to CrossBorder Capital data, some $26 billion flowed out of UK financial assets in July.

CrossBorder Capital analyses published data on equity, bond and banking flows from a range of sources, including the Bank for International Settlements, exchange traded funds and national current account records. Foreign direct investment flows are excluded.

It uses the data to compile its "Global Liquidity Index". The UK component of this index fell to 28.6 in August from 33.8 a month earlier and an annual high of 62.3 in February. A reading above 50 denotes expansion, a reading below 50 a contraction.

"The sterling index has effectively collapsed and the UK is second only to Japan in terms of financial market outflows," Howell said.

So far this year, there has been a net $206 billion outflow from the UK. Last year, there was a net annual inflow of $63 billion, Howell said. (Reporting by Jamie McGeever; Editing by Larry King)

I don't see why Scotland voting yes would be a huge problem for UK equities, so maybe it's just general political uncertainty selling.
"Stability is destabilizing." --Hyman Minsky

"Complacency can be a self-denying prophecy."
"We have nothing to fear but lack of fear itself." --Larry Summers

grumbler

Quote from: Admiral Yi on September 11, 2014, 03:57:56 PM
Heard on NPR that Lloyds and RBS have announced they will move their HQs to England if Scotland becomes independent.
Not exactly.  The NPR report was that they would re-incorporate in the (new) UK if Scotland goes independent.  Most of the existing jobs would stay where they are, but the senior staff would have to relocate.
The future is all around us, waiting, in moments of transition, to be born in moments of revelation. No one knows the shape of that future or where it will take us. We know only that it is always born in pain.   -G'Kar

Bayraktar!

grumbler

Quote from: Tyr on September 12, 2014, 12:02:03 PM
Belgium . There's no celts there.
China. It's not in the centre of anything.
Bolivia. Bolivar is dead. And was hardly particular to Bolivia.

China is named after the Chin dynasty.  Why is that suddenly not relevant?

Why can countries only be named for living people?  What sense does that make?
The future is all around us, waiting, in moments of transition, to be born in moments of revelation. No one knows the shape of that future or where it will take us. We know only that it is always born in pain.   -G'Kar

Bayraktar!

Martinus

Tyr as always shows himself to be silly. The United Kingdom is not a geographical or a historical name - it is a name specifically relevant to the political structure of the state. If the United Kingdom uses the name after Scotland leaves, it would be like modern Poland using the name of the Commonwealth of Poland and Lithuania.