News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

[de Blasio] Living in a post-Bloomberg era

Started by garbon, January 30, 2014, 12:59:19 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

garbon

Quote from: Capetan Mihali on May 21, 2014, 09:26:27 AM
A police officer, a paramedic, a rabbi, a nurse, and a Boy Scout leader walk into the Protective Custody Unit on Riker's Island... :unsure:

The idea of some sort of walking into a bar joke did cross my mind when I first read the article. :D
"I've never been quite sure what the point of a eunuch is, if truth be told. It seems to me they're only men with the useful bits cut off."
I drank because I wanted to drown my sorrows, but now the damned things have learned to swim.

DGuller

Quote from: garbon on May 21, 2014, 09:26:28 AM
Quote from: DGuller on May 21, 2014, 09:22:19 AM
As disgusting is at is to view child porn, I have real problems with putting people in prison merely for viewing it.  It seems dangerously close to a thought crime, and another one of those punishments thought up by people who think of the children.  If someone is wired to be perverted in such a way, I'd much rather have them look at images of naked children than actual naked children they have authority over.

Without getting too far into, that last defendant was certainly guilty of more than a thought crime.
I wasn't talking about everyone charged, just the vast majority.  It did say right before that "Authorities say some of the defendants had access to young children, though there were no reports of abuse."

CountDeMoney

Quote from: DGuller on May 21, 2014, 09:22:19 AM
As disgusting is at is to view child porn, I have real problems with putting people in prison merely for viewing it.

Well I dont, so fuck you and your Martinusesque rationalizing.  Fuckhead.

Barrister

Quote from: DGuller on May 21, 2014, 09:22:19 AM
As disgusting is at is to view child porn, I have real problems with putting people in prison merely for viewing it.  It seems dangerously close to a thought crime, and another one of those punishments thought up by people who think of the children.  If someone is wired to be perverted in such a way, I'd much rather have them look at images of naked children than actual naked children they have authority over.

But someone generated those pictures of naked children, and those children are continuously re-victimized as those pictures are re-downloaded.
Posts here are my own private opinions.  I do not speak for my employer.

DGuller

Quote from: Barrister on May 21, 2014, 10:42:07 AM
Quote from: DGuller on May 21, 2014, 09:22:19 AM
As disgusting is at is to view child porn, I have real problems with putting people in prison merely for viewing it.  It seems dangerously close to a thought crime, and another one of those punishments thought up by people who think of the children.  If someone is wired to be perverted in such a way, I'd much rather have them look at images of naked children than actual naked children they have authority over.

But someone generated those pictures of naked children, and those children are continuously re-victimized as those pictures are re-downloaded.
That is true, but should we also punish pot smokers for mass murders in Mexico?

Razgovory

Quote from: DGuller on May 21, 2014, 10:48:23 AM
Quote from: Barrister on May 21, 2014, 10:42:07 AM
Quote from: DGuller on May 21, 2014, 09:22:19 AM
As disgusting is at is to view child porn, I have real problems with putting people in prison merely for viewing it.  It seems dangerously close to a thought crime, and another one of those punishments thought up by people who think of the children.  If someone is wired to be perverted in such a way, I'd much rather have them look at images of naked children than actual naked children they have authority over.

But someone generated those pictures of naked children, and those children are continuously re-victimized as those pictures are re-downloaded.
That is true, but should we also punish pot smokers for mass murders in Mexico?

Yes! Also Barrister has the right of it.
I've given it serious thought. I must scorn the ways of my family, and seek a Japanese woman to yield me my progeny. He shall live in the lands of the east, and be well tutored in his sacred trust to weave the best traditions of Japan and the Sacred South together, until such time as he (or, indeed his house, which will periodically require infusion of both Southern and Japanese bloodlines of note) can deliver to the South it's independence, either in this world or in space.  -Lettow April of 2011

Raz is right. -MadImmortalMan March of 2017

Valmy

Quote from: Barrister on May 21, 2014, 10:42:07 AM
But someone generated those pictures of naked children, and those children are continuously re-victimized as those pictures are re-downloaded.

So forms of child porn that do not involve actual children are fine then?
Quote"This is a Russian warship. I propose you lay down arms and surrender to avoid bloodshed & unnecessary victims. Otherwise, you'll be bombed."

Zmiinyi defenders: "Russian warship, go fuck yourself."

Valmy

Quote"This is a Russian warship. I propose you lay down arms and surrender to avoid bloodshed & unnecessary victims. Otherwise, you'll be bombed."

Zmiinyi defenders: "Russian warship, go fuck yourself."

Sheilbh

Quote from: DGuller on May 21, 2014, 10:48:23 AM
That is true, but should we also punish pot smokers for mass murders in Mexico?
No. We should punish them for possession of pot, just like people with child porn are punished for possession of child porn - not child abuse.
Let's bomb Russia!

Valmy

Quote from: Sheilbh on May 21, 2014, 10:59:30 AM
Quote from: DGuller on May 21, 2014, 10:48:23 AM
That is true, but should we also punish pot smokers for mass murders in Mexico?
No. We should punish them for possession of pot, just like people with child porn are punished for possession of child porn - not child abuse.

That is the plan.  So far we have the highest incarceration rate in the world and drug use is not seriously being impacted....

Plan B?
Quote"This is a Russian warship. I propose you lay down arms and surrender to avoid bloodshed & unnecessary victims. Otherwise, you'll be bombed."

Zmiinyi defenders: "Russian warship, go fuck yourself."

Sheilbh

Quote from: Valmy on May 21, 2014, 11:01:56 AM
That is the plan.  So far we have the highest incarceration rate in the world and drug use is not seriously being impacted....

Plan B?
Fine. Whatever.

My point was that DGuller's child porn analogy is wrong not a comment on drug policy :P
Let's bomb Russia!

DGuller

Quote from: Sheilbh on May 21, 2014, 10:59:30 AM
Quote from: DGuller on May 21, 2014, 10:48:23 AM
That is true, but should we also punish pot smokers for mass murders in Mexico?
No. We should punish them for possession of pot, just like people with child porn are punished for possession of child porn - not child abuse.
Except the punishment for possession of child porn is idiotically extreme under the theory that your possession of porn abuses some child.

Sheilbh

Quote from: DGuller on May 21, 2014, 11:24:30 AM
Except the punishment for possession of child porn is idiotically extreme under the theory that your possession of porn abuses some child.
How is it idiotically extreme?

It doesn't work fully but a better analogy is perhaps poaching and trade of products from endangered species.
Let's bomb Russia!

DGuller

Years in prison and sex offender registry for life extreme.

Syt

Quote from: DGuller on May 21, 2014, 11:24:30 AM
Quote from: Sheilbh on May 21, 2014, 10:59:30 AM
Quote from: DGuller on May 21, 2014, 10:48:23 AM
That is true, but should we also punish pot smokers for mass murders in Mexico?
No. We should punish them for possession of pot, just like people with child porn are punished for possession of child porn - not child abuse.
Except the punishment for possession of child porn is idiotically extreme under the theory that your possession of porn abuses some child.

A strong aspect of this is also victim protection. By sharing/selling pictures of a child being abused you basically repeat the abuse. By declaring possession legal, it could be argued that in hindsight you validate the abuse.

Time for some roleplaying.

Let's say you were abused as a child by a close friend or relative who taped the whole thing and sold it to whoever wanted. Add the trauma and counselling on your side. And that the images or videos of it are floating around the internet, 20 years later. And that they may very well continue to do so till the day you die, and that possession of videos of you sucking cock with tears running down your cheeks is completely legal (or tolerated).

A gray area (and many countries seem to handle it differently) are cases of fiction - either in drawing or word.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein's brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops.
—Stephen Jay Gould

Proud owner of 42 Zoupa Points.