News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

[Canada] Canadian Politics Redux

Started by Josephus, March 22, 2011, 09:27:34 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Grey Fox

The fact that the Federal government & the NCC can only look at english speaking contractors to provide services because having a french speaking contractors considered is too much of a burden and incurs delay is a god damn travesty.

French remains nothing but a burden to the RoC.
Getting ready to make IEDs against American Occupation Forces.

"But I didn't vote for him"; they cried.

crazy canuck

Quote from: Grey Fox on Today at 11:32:55 AMThe fact that the Federal government & the NCC can only look at english speaking contractors to provide services because having a french speaking contractors considered is too much of a burden and incurs delay is a god damn travesty.

French remains nothing but a burden to the RoC.

That is certainly the spin in the article.  But that is not consistent with the facts reported even in that newspaper.  The facts are that the companies who were shortlisted were all English speaking and so it made no sense to make the documentation bilingual. By the way, nobody selects a direct bid company on the basis of language, it is on the basis of the ability to do the job, but again that doesn't conform with the linguistic grievance narrative.

Awarded 17 Zoupa points

In several surveys, the overwhelming first choice for what makes Canada unique is multiculturalism. This, in a world collapsing into stupid, impoverishing hatreds, is the distinctly Canadian national project.

HVC

The article assumes that NCC choose English only bidders to avoid translation costs, but offers no evidence. Translating documents for no reason would be dumb. And I wouldn't expect English version for a bid procurement from all francophone companies.

Now, if NCC has a history of excluding francophone or bilingual companies that another issue, but the reporter offers no proof of that. Does NCC also work with francophone companies as well? Surely it would be easy for the reporter to find out. The fact that it's not mentioned leads me to believe that not the case as it would be a damning point easy to score for Mathilde.
Being lazy is bad; unless you still get what you want, then it's called "patience".
Hubris must be punished. Severely.

crazy canuck

Quote from: Oexmelin on Today at 11:21:11 AMIf the angle is always "commercial and practical realities", we may as well dispense with the fiction that Canada is bilingual.

The Civil Code in Quebec allows for contracts to be drafted in English if that is the intent of both parties.  Commercial and practical realities are not an "angle" they are "realities".
Awarded 17 Zoupa points

In several surveys, the overwhelming first choice for what makes Canada unique is multiculturalism. This, in a world collapsing into stupid, impoverishing hatreds, is the distinctly Canadian national project.

HVC

Don't forget to do your civic duty and fill out your census fellow Canadians  :contract:
Being lazy is bad; unless you still get what you want, then it's called "patience".
Hubris must be punished. Severely.

viper37

Quote from: crazy canuck on Today at 09:40:08 AMDirect bid processes are not uncommon and in fact make commercial sense.  If the companies selected for the direct bid process communicate in English, what would be the purpose of translating all of the contractual documentation into French? 
But it's always French that's a burden.  Somehow, English is never a burden?

Imagine if the Quebec govt decides no documents will be sent in English for large contracts.  Oh, the furor of the Globe and Mail, the National Post, the Toronto Star!
I don't do meditation.  I drink alcohol to relax, like normal people.

If Microsoft Excel decided to stop working overnight, the world would practically end.

Valmy

These days you can just run it through an AI translator. Some burden.
Quote"This is a Russian warship. I propose you lay down arms and surrender to avoid bloodshed & unnecessary victims. Otherwise, you'll be bombed."

Zmiinyi defenders: "Russian warship, go fuck yourself."

HVC

Quote from: Valmy on Today at 05:41:49 PMThese days you can just run it through an AI translator. Some burden.

I don't think we should encourage people or companies to use AI for legal documents. There there be dragons :P
Being lazy is bad; unless you still get what you want, then it's called "patience".
Hubris must be punished. Severely.

viper37

Quote from: HVC on Today at 03:11:28 PMDon't forget to do your civic duty and fill out your census fellow Canadians  :contract:
Done for both :)
I don't do meditation.  I drink alcohol to relax, like normal people.

If Microsoft Excel decided to stop working overnight, the world would practically end.

Valmy

Quote from: HVC on Today at 05:46:59 PM
Quote from: Valmy on Today at 05:41:49 PMThese days you can just run it through an AI translator. Some burden.

I don't think we should encourage people or companies to use AI for legal documents. There there be dragons :P

The federal Canadian government should fund a special AI just for lazy English speaking Canadian governments and companies to translate documents. The AI should be programmed to shame whomever uses it though.
Quote"This is a Russian warship. I propose you lay down arms and surrender to avoid bloodshed & unnecessary victims. Otherwise, you'll be bombed."

Zmiinyi defenders: "Russian warship, go fuck yourself."

HVC

Quote from: viper37 on Today at 05:28:29 PM
Quote from: crazy canuck on Today at 09:40:08 AMDirect bid processes are not uncommon and in fact make commercial sense.  If the companies selected for the direct bid process communicate in English, what would be the purpose of translating all of the contractual documentation into French? 
But it's always French that's a burden.  Somehow, English is never a burden?

Imagine if the Quebec govt decides no documents will be sent in English for large contracts.  Oh, the furor of the Globe and Mail, the National Post, the Toronto Star!

In a direct bid process to francophone companies? I doubt they'd care. Open bidding would be different, or if it was shown that the companies were picked specifically because they were francophone (something not shown in this case).
Being lazy is bad; unless you still get what you want, then it's called "patience".
Hubris must be punished. Severely.

HVC

Quote from: Valmy on Today at 05:50:14 PM
Quote from: HVC on Today at 05:46:59 PM
Quote from: Valmy on Today at 05:41:49 PMThese days you can just run it through an AI translator. Some burden.

I don't think we should encourage people or companies to use AI for legal documents. There there be dragons :P

The federal Canadian government should fund a special AI just for lazy English speaking Canadian governments and companies to translate documents. The AI should be programmed to shame whomever uses it though.

I hope you spell all your French text in larger bolded font, in solidarity :lol:
Being lazy is bad; unless you still get what you want, then it's called "patience".
Hubris must be punished. Severely.

viper37

Quote from: HVC on Today at 11:46:42 AMThe article assumes that NCC choose English only bidders to avoid translation costs, but offers no evidence. Translating documents for no reason would be dumb. And I wouldn't expect English version for a bid procurement from all francophone companies.

Now, if NCC has a history of excluding francophone or bilingual companies that another issue, but the reporter offers no proof of that. Does NCC also work with francophone companies as well? Surely it would be easy for the reporter to find out. The fact that it's not mentioned leads me to believe that not the case as it would be a damning point easy to score for Mathilde.
Contract rules specifies that the bidding process should be open to all, but they can have exception for emergencies.  They use emergencies loosely.

NCC should work with both francophone and anglophone companies, but it works either with everyone or anglophone companies only.
I don't do meditation.  I drink alcohol to relax, like normal people.

If Microsoft Excel decided to stop working overnight, the world would practically end.

HVC

Article says direct bid is an option under for projects under a certain dollar amount, not in emergency situations?
Being lazy is bad; unless you still get what you want, then it's called "patience".
Hubris must be punished. Severely.

viper37

Quote from: HVC on Today at 05:53:00 PM
Quote from: viper37 on Today at 05:28:29 PM
Quote from: crazy canuck on Today at 09:40:08 AMDirect bid processes are not uncommon and in fact make commercial sense.  If the companies selected for the direct bid process communicate in English, what would be the purpose of translating all of the contractual documentation into French? 
But it's always French that's a burden.  Somehow, English is never a burden?

Imagine if the Quebec govt decides no documents will be sent in English for large contracts.  Oh, the furor of the Globe and Mail, the National Post, the Toronto Star!

In a direct bid process to francophone companies? I doubt they'd care. Open bidding would be different, or if it was shown that the companies were picked specifically because they were francophone (something not shown in this case).
It is shown that the companies were selected on a per language basis.  Do you think they called Jacques Martin Construction Inc from Vanier to ask him if he's interested in bidding on their project?
I don't do meditation.  I drink alcohol to relax, like normal people.

If Microsoft Excel decided to stop working overnight, the world would practically end.