News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

TV/Movies Megathread

Started by Eddie Teach, March 06, 2011, 09:29:27 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Maladict

Quote from: Barrister on November 12, 2024, 03:50:48 PM
Quote from: Maladict on November 12, 2024, 02:30:03 PM
Quote from: Barrister on November 12, 2024, 10:42:16 AM
Quote from: celedhring on November 10, 2024, 08:40:30 AMSo, I'm watching Mrs Davies - and enjoying it - but there's this episode where they supposedly travel to Rome. The episode is shot in Barcelona, which very much can't pass as Rome if you have any sense of Rome as a city, and one of the key plotpoints is that the protagonist has to acquire what they call a "King's cake" in a local bakery - which is revealed to be a Spanish roscón de reyes, very much NOT an Italian thing.

I hate when yank shows do this kind of thing -- "I don't know... it's Europe! Look... European stuff!·"  :lol:

Just as a flip side - I remember watching the movie Angels & Demons, staring Tom Hanks and based on the Dan Brown book.

It is not a very good movie.

But it was set in Rome, filmed in Rome, and its very Roman-ness just shone through, so it was enjoyable in a travelogue sort of way.

Terrible movie, terrible book. Watch The Great Beauty if you're looking for an ode to Rome.

So I literally said "It is not a very good movie".

But it is still a Ron Howard movie starring Tom Hanks.  It's very competently made, and Hanks is always watchable.  But yes the story is stupid.  Enjoy it for being a movie all about Rome and it's history.

I was agreeing with you  :)

Tonitrus

Quote from: The Minsky Moment on November 12, 2024, 12:46:23 PM
Quote from: grumbler on November 11, 2024, 08:22:16 PM
Quote from: Baron von Schtinkenbutt on November 11, 2024, 07:40:51 PM
Quote from: Syt on November 10, 2024, 04:45:39 AMFinally watched The Hunt For Red October.  :blush:

It's a good film. :)

:banned:

HFRO was a good movie and the best Clancy adaptation. 

Detailed and realistic cinematic treatment that had tragic consequences in real life, as a panicked Soviet high command dismissed all Scotsmen from the Soviet Navy.

And in a great but of unintentionality...Sean Connery kills Putin (the name of the political officer) early in the film.  :P

grumbler

Quote from: Syt on November 12, 2024, 01:43:04 AMAlso, not having read any Clancy books (not really into spy thrillers and such) - how much of the silliness was intentional? :P

Clancy took himself very seriously.

Here's an interesting tidbit about him that isn't well-known:  when he wrote Red Storm Rising, he included the idea that the Soviets would keep their SSBNs in an Artic "bastion" to free up more SSNs for the attack on the Atlantic Sea Lines of Communication.  This was not at all what our intelligence was predicting.  I was a team leader in the 1987 Strategic ASW review (basically, a big annual paper wargame looking at USN needs in Antisubmarine Warfare five, ten, and twenty years into the future) and we originally didn't have the Soviets using that strategy. 

Admiral Bobby Inman, by then retired, had preached for several years as head of the NSA and then CIA that the Soviet use of such a strategy would greatly alter USN ASW needs, but the CNO's office (that ran the study) had never tasked us to look at it.  The came Red Storm Rising, proposing exactly what Inman thought was the most dangerous Soviet strategy, and, since everyone in the business read it, the CNO's office was forced to add it to the study.  The result showed a massive capability gap in the speed with which the USN could attrite the Soviet sub threat, and that led directly to the greatly accelerated plan to replace older SSNs with the $3 billion-per-copy Seawolf and then Virginia class submarines.

My boss was convinced that Inman set Clancy up to send exactly the message he had been preaching inside the Navy. It was a rather peculiar coincidence, if it wasn't deliberate.
The future is all around us, waiting, in moments of transition, to be born in moments of revelation. No one knows the shape of that future or where it will take us. We know only that it is always born in pain.   -G'Kar

Bayraktar!

celedhring

Quote from: grumbler on November 12, 2024, 08:06:32 PM
Quote from: Syt on November 12, 2024, 01:43:04 AMAlso, not having read any Clancy books (not really into spy thrillers and such) - how much of the silliness was intentional? :P

Clancy took himself very seriously.

Here's an interesting tidbit about him that isn't well-known:  when he wrote Red Storm Rising, he included the idea that the Soviets would keep their SSBNs in an Artic "bastion" to free up more SSNs for the attack on the Atlantic Sea Lines of Communication.  This was not at all what our intelligence was predicting.  I was a team leader in the 1987 Strategic ASW review (basically, a big annual paper wargame looking at USN needs in Antisubmarine Warfare five, ten, and twenty years into the future) and we originally didn't have the Soviets using that strategy. 

Admiral Bobby Inman, by then retired, had preached for several years as head of the NSA and then CIA that the Soviet use of such a strategy would greatly alter USN ASW needs, but the CNO's office (that ran the study) had never tasked us to look at it.  The came Red Storm Rising, proposing exactly what Inman thought was the most dangerous Soviet strategy, and, since everyone in the business read it, the CNO's office was forced to add it to the study.  The result showed a massive capability gap in the speed with which the USN could attrite the Soviet sub threat, and that led directly to the greatly accelerated plan to replace older SSNs with the $3 billion-per-copy Seawolf and then Virginia class submarines.

My boss was convinced that Inman set Clancy up to send exactly the message he had been preaching inside the Navy. It was a rather peculiar coincidence, if it wasn't deliberate.

I love when you share this kind of stories. Thanks.

Just catching up with Fall of the House of Usher throughout Halloween. It's quite trashy, which is not without its fun, but overall I'm finding it to be among the weakest Flanagan efforts.

Syt

Quote from: celedhring on November 13, 2024, 01:45:39 AMI love when you share this kind of stories. Thanks.

Same, thank you for sharing! :)
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein's brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops.
—Stephen Jay Gould

Proud owner of 42 Zoupa Points.

Norgy

I really liked the first few seasons of "The Walking Dead". These sequels they have made, I could probably not be more underwhelmed after a few episodes of each one.

Even Darryl Dixon is not interesting anymore. And how the fuck did he get himself to France?


Josquius

Quote from: Norgy on November 13, 2024, 07:08:53 AMI really liked the first few seasons of "The Walking Dead". These sequels they have made, I could probably not be more underwhelmed after a few episodes of each one.

Even Darryl Dixon is not interesting anymore. And how the fuck did he get himself to France?



I lost it all with the Neegan flash forward.
That sounds just bizarre. I guess France is where the show was still doing well?
██████
██████
██████

Maladict


Josephus

Quote from: Norgy on November 13, 2024, 07:08:53 AMI really liked the first few seasons of "The Walking Dead". These sequels they have made, I could probably not be more underwhelmed after a few episodes of each one.

Even Darryl Dixon is not interesting anymore. And how the fuck did he get himself to France?



A boat. Carol took a plane with a stop over in Greenland.

Civis Romanus Sum<br /><br />"My friends, love is better than anger. Hope is better than fear. Optimism is better than despair. So let us be loving, hopeful and optimistic. And we'll change the world." Jack Layton 1950-2011

Norgy

Yeah, with 20 years of walking undead, I am sure there was plenty of fuel just sitting around.

Sheilbh

Quote from: celedhring on November 13, 2024, 01:45:39 AMJust catching up with Fall of the House of Usher throughout Halloween. It's quite trashy, which is not without its fun, but overall I'm finding it to be among the weakest Flanagan efforts.
Agree - loved Hill House especially. But House of Usher was, I felt, the weakest of the bunch.
Let's bomb Russia!

garbon

Quote from: Sheilbh on November 13, 2024, 04:34:42 PM
Quote from: celedhring on November 13, 2024, 01:45:39 AMJust catching up with Fall of the House of Usher throughout Halloween. It's quite trashy, which is not without its fun, but overall I'm finding it to be among the weakest Flanagan efforts.
Agree - loved Hill House especially. But House of Usher was, I felt, the weakest of the bunch.

I thought Midnight Club was the worst, I gave up.

Actually I started and never finished basically all of them. Only completed Bly Manor and I think that's because I like T'Nia Miller. :blush:
"I've never been quite sure what the point of a eunuch is, if truth be told. It seems to me they're only men with the useful bits cut off."
I drank because I wanted to drown my sorrows, but now the damned things have learned to swim.

Sheilbh

I liked Bly Manor and Hill House - also Midnight Mass.

Didn't know Midnight Club was him to be honest. I don't think I've watched it or it doesn't stick in my mind.
Let's bomb Russia!

celedhring

Haven't watched Midnight Club either, but I liked the other ones - Hill House in particular. Also, I enjoyed Doctor Sleep more than I probably should have.  :Embarrass:

Savonarola

The Maltese Falcon (1941)

This is the third version of The Maltese Falcon made.  The first, in 1931, was competently made, but wasn't really memorable.  (Strangely Bebe Daniels, Harold Lloyd's leading lady and ex-fiancee, is the femme fatale.)  The second "Satan Made A Lady" (1936) was more lighthearted and comic than either the 1931 or 1941 versions; it has Bette Davis in the Mary Astor role, but it isn't very good.  The 1941 version is the masterpiece.  You couldn't ask for a better cast, snappier dialog or better cinematography.  Had Bogart not been been Rick Blaine a year later he would forever have been Sam Spade.
In Italy, for thirty years under the Borgias, they had warfare, terror, murder and bloodshed, but they produced Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci and the Renaissance. In Switzerland, they had brotherly love, they had five hundred years of democracy and peace—and what did that produce? The cuckoo clock