big GOP masturbatory thread over Hillary's testimony today

[sbr]

Wasn't going to say anything about it here but since you brought it up--

Best parts were Rand Paul and John McCain ripping her. She did a poor job of defending herself, but who would in that position. Hearing Hillary say "I don't recall" takes me back to the 90s

You are easily impressed by pointless grandstanding.  What exactly did they prove?  What sort of terrible malfeasance did they uncover?

Right, Raz.  "Move along, nothing to see here..."

Ambassador and 3 others were killed by terrorists.  Worth exploring why it happened, who is responsible for the negligence, how it could have been prevented, and why the administration seemed to mislead the public as to the cause.  If this were a GOP administration I would have to think you would want the SoS to be called to account. 

I will say that she did score some points with me by throwing Susan Rice under the bus

Why does there have to be negligence involved in this particular terrorist attack?

EDITED TO AVOID SILLY ARGUMENTS.

[Razgovory]

Wasn't going to say anything about it here but since you brought it up--

Best parts were Rand Paul and John McCain ripping her. She did a poor job of defending herself, but who would in that position. Hearing Hillary say "I don't recall" takes me back to the 90s

You are easily impressed by pointless grandstanding.  What exactly did they prove?  What sort of terrible malfeasance did they uncover?

Right, Raz.  "Move along, nothing to see here..."

Ambassador and 3 others were killed by terrorists.  Worth exploring why it happened, who is responsible for the negligence, how it could have been prevented, and why the administration seemed to mislead the public as to the cause.  If this were a GOP administration I would have to think you would want the SoS to be called to account. 

I will say that she did score some points with me by throwing Susan Rice under the bus

Yeah, so again, what exactly did those two prove today?  I saw grandstanding intended to pander to well, you.  It is worth seeing why it happened, but that's not what Republicans were looking for, is it?  No, this was effort to look for someone to punish and blame and look good in front of the cameras.  I also saw that many of the Republicans were rather ignorant of whole situation, assuming she had a live feed (which she did not), unaware of the volume of documents that sent to the State Department, and one hapless Senator seemed to be under the impression that jets flying out of Italy could be used to for some kind of "non-lethal" measures to protect the Ambassador.

[CountDeMoney]

I will say that she did score some points with me by throwing Susan Rice under the bus

Only thing better would've been dragging her behind the pick-up truck, right?

[Razgovory]

Those are 2 pretty good people to be ripping into you if you want to prove your credibility on any issue these days.

McCain cannot be compared in anyway to that wackjob.

What problem do you have with Paul, Tim?

Well the opposition to the Civil Rights bill of 1964 for one thing.

[derspiess]

Why does there have to be negligence involved in this particular terrorist attack?

EDITED TO AVOID SILLY ARGUMENTS.

Seems pretty obvious to me.  Ambassador Stevens had expressed concerns about security prior to the attacks.  He had requested additional security.  He ended up getting hit on the 10th anniversary of 9/11/02 (when I would think you'd beef up security by default) and had just two guys to protect him at the time.  Seems like there was negligence somewhere on someone's part.

[sbr]

Those are 2 pretty good people to be ripping into you if you want to prove your credibility on any issue these days.

McCain cannot be compared in anyway to that wackjob.

What problem do you have with Paul, Tim?

Well the opposition to the Civil Rights bill of 1964 for one thing.

Why are we worried about the opinion of a 1 year old on Civil Rights?

[CountDeMoney]

What problem do you have with Paul, Tim?

Well the opposition to the Civil Rights bill of 1964 for one thing.

derspiess likes the fact that Paul attaches "Personhood Amendments" to his electric and phone bills.

[jimmy olsen]

I will say that she did score some points with me by throwing Susan Rice under the bus

Only thing better would've been dragging her behind the pick-up truck, right?

Over the top there.

[derspiess]

I will say that she did score some points with me by throwing Susan Rice under the bus

Only thing better would've been dragging her behind the pick-up truck, right?

Surprised you didn't make a "back of the bus" crack.  But yeah, go ahead & try to mask your own racism by throwing around baseless accusations against others.

[derspiess]

Those are 2 pretty good people to be ripping into you if you want to prove your credibility on any issue these days.

McCain cannot be compared in anyway to that wackjob.

What problem do you have with Paul, Tim?

Well the opposition to the Civil Rights bill of 1964 for one thing.

ARE YOU TIM?

[sbr]

Why does there have to be negligence involved in this particular terrorist attack?

EDITED TO AVOID SILLY ARGUMENTS.

Seems pretty obvious to me.  Ambassador Stevens had expressed concerns about security prior to the attacks.  He had requested additional security.  He ended up getting hit on the 10th anniversary of 9/11/02 (when I would think you'd beef up security by default) and had just two guys to protect him at the time.  Seems like there was negligence somewhere on someone's part.

OK that seems fair.

I really don't know much about the back story of Bengazi-gate.

[Razgovory]

Why does there have to be negligence involved in this particular terrorist attack?

EDITED TO AVOID SILLY ARGUMENTS.

Seems pretty obvious to me.  Ambassador Stevens had expressed concerns about security prior to the attacks.  He had requested additional security.  He ended up getting hit on the 10th anniversary of 9/11/02 (when I would think you'd beef up security by default) and had just two guys to protect him at the time.  Seems like there was negligence somewhere on someone's part.

Well if it seems obvious to you, I suppose that you are the one negligent.  You didn't warn the correct authorities.

[sbr]

Those are 2 pretty good people to be ripping into you if you want to prove your credibility on any issue these days.

McCain cannot be compared in anyway to that wackjob.

What problem do you have with Paul, Tim?

Well the opposition to the Civil Rights bill of 1964 for one thing.

ARE YOU TIM?

Over the top there.

[CountDeMoney]

I will say that she did score some points with me by throwing Susan Rice under the bus

Only thing better would've been dragging her behind the pick-up truck, right?

Surprised you didn't make a "back of the bus" crack.  But yeah, go ahead & try to mask your own racism by throwing around baseless accusations against others.

I'm not the one with a hard-on for professional black women.


That would be Ideologue.

[derspiess]

Why does there have to be negligence involved in this particular terrorist attack?

EDITED TO AVOID SILLY ARGUMENTS.

Seems pretty obvious to me.  Ambassador Stevens had expressed concerns about security prior to the attacks.  He had requested additional security.  He ended up getting hit on the 10th anniversary of 9/11/02 (when I would think you'd beef up security by default) and had just two guys to protect him at the time.  Seems like there was negligence somewhere on someone's part.

Well if it seems obvious to you, I suppose that you are the one negligent.  You didn't warn the correct authorities.

You forget your meds today?