Alex Salmond to let 16-year-olds vote in bid to secure independence

[Razgovory]

Of course I am.  You don't read well.

well you propose an alliance of all anglos.  Not the creation of one big country for all culture.  Or one where english-speakers would be a minority.

An Anglo Union would simply be righting a historical wrong (American independence).

But I'm flexible.  The opportunity to join the European Union would suit just as well (which a union of the Anglo countries under the auspices of the United Kingdom would achieve by default, although obviously it'd probably break the EU entirely, since the outnumbering thing?  Not by my count).

Actually, even in a world state that let anyone in, English speakers would still form a plurality.  Over 400 million native speakers, some 2 billion total.  The language of world administration would not be Belgianese.

What are you, Neil now?  What what purpose would we want such a union?

[Neil]

What are you, Neil now?  What what purpose would we want such a union?

Hey now.  I hate the idea of a union, mainly because Americans are dangerous lunatics.

[Razgovory]

What are you, Neil now?  What what purpose would we want such a union?

Hey now.  I hate the idea of a union, mainly because Americans are dangerous lunatics.

So the American Revolution was a good thing?

[Neil]

What are you, Neil now?  What what purpose would we want such a union?

Hey now.  I hate the idea of a union, mainly because Americans are dangerous lunatics.

So the American Revolution was a good thing?

Not at all.  It let Americans run amok rather than being governed by more reasonable people.  It also permanently skewed you guys towards a dangerous extremism.

[Viking]

if you don't say you want a cock in your ass, you're homophobic.  So be it, I shall be the anti-gay then.

BTW, to be specific. If you don't want any cock in your ass you are a homophobe, if you don't want a specific cock in your ass you are a slut.

[garbon]

if you don't say you want a cock in your ass, you're homophobic.  So be it, I shall be the anti-gay then.

BTW, to be specific. If you don't want any cock in your ass you are a homophobe, if you don't want a specific cock in your ass you are a slut.

[Viking]

if you don't say you want a cock in your ass, you're homophobic.  So be it, I shall be the anti-gay then.

BTW, to be specific. If you don't want any cock in your ass you are a homophobe, if you don't want a specific cock in your ass you are a slut.

let me try the joke again... I think I screwed it up first time round

BTW, to be specific. If you don't want any cock in your ass you are a homophobe, if you somebody else's cock in your ass you are a slut.

[insert laugh track]

better?

[garbon]

If you somebody else's cock?

[Viking]

If you somebody else's cock?

sigh...

BTW, to be specific. If you don't want any cock in your ass you are a homophobe, if you want somebody else's cock in your ass you are a slut.

[Habbaku]

Nope, still not funny.  Maybe try again?

[garbon]

If you somebody else's cock?

sigh...

BTW, to be specific. If you don't want any cock in your ass you are a homophobe, if you want somebody else's cock in your ass you are a slut.

But what if you just want one cock to be monogamous with? How's that slutty?

[Ideologue]

If you somebody else's cock?

sigh...

BTW, to be specific. If you don't want any cock in your ass you are a homophobe, if you want somebody else's cock in your ass you are a slut.

But what if you just want one cock to be monogamous with? How's that slutty?

A theoretical construct, like a tachyon or closed timelike curve.  The equations permit such a phenomenon, but they have not yet been observed in nature.

[garbon]

If you somebody else's cock?

sigh...

BTW, to be specific. If you don't want any cock in your ass you are a homophobe, if you want somebody else's cock in your ass you are a slut.

But what if you just want one cock to be monogamous with? How's that slutty?

A theoretical construct, like a tachyon or closed timelike curve.  The equations permit such a phenomenon, but they have not yet been observed in nature.

I wasn't talking about me!

[Ideologue]

I'm sure there are some purely monogamous gay folk around, but I've never met one; the ones that have serious committed relationships are still pretty open about getting strange.  I assume they operate on some sort of honor system.  I think one of the great advantages is that there need be no tit-for-tat bedpost notching, or feeling of exploitation, since the whole family can enjoy, unlike heteros with open relationships who will need a finer tuned arrangement.

Oh, also, you don't have to deal with women.  That's the other great advantage.

[viper37]

Clearly you are easily fooled.  Your language policies communicate superiority over other groups.  Why aren't First Nation languages protected in Quebec?

In a way, they are.  Inside their communities, the native languages are sometimes taught in schools.  Nobody speaks Huron anymore, and I think it's the same for the Mohawk communities.  But other languages, like Montagnais are part of the education program in their communities.  They are semi-autonomous, so they pretty much decide what they want to do.  In the Huron village, signs are in some indian language as well as in French, depending on what they choose.

All the First Nation in Quebec!  They could have a bunch of little countries.  Francophones could have the St. Lawrence river valley (since there weren't any Indians there), the Indians can have the rest.  You know, to protect their cultural distinctiveness.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agreement_Respecting_a_New_Relationship_Between_the_Cree_Nation_and_the_Government_of_Quebec