The Cause of the American Civil War and the US Citizenship Test

Started by jimmy olsen, March 29, 2011, 06:49:46 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

jimmy olsen

Here's something new and exciting to discuss!  :D

http://www.salon.com/books/history/index.html?story=/politics/war_room/2011/03/29/barbour_civil_war_citizenship
QuoteHaley Barbour, slavery and the citizenship test
By Steven Lubet

Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour recently acknowledged that the Civil War was fought over slavery. As reported by Politico, Barbour recognized that "Slavery was the primary, central cause of secession." That may not seem like news, but many Southerners have insisted that the "War of Northern Aggression," as they call it, was fought over more palatable issues, such as states' rights or economic autonomy. That is nonsense, but it still took some courage for Barbour, in an interview with professor Robert S. McElvaine of Millsaps College, to repudiate a long-held myth about the nobility of the "Lost Cause."

Of course, Barbour's repudiation of secession is no doubt prompted, at least in part, by his all-but-declared candidacy for president. As a national candidate he will have to appeal beyond his Southern base, and that means rejecting Confederate apologia in favor of, well, actual history.

Now, if only the federal government would do the same thing.

Unbelievably, the official study guide for the U.S. citizenship test still lists three acceptable answers for the question about the causes of the Civil War: slavery, economic reasons and states' rights. The latter two answers, as Gov. Barbour now freely admits, are simply wrong. In fact, they are worse than wrong, because they obscure a central fact about American history. As Barbour put it, "the Civil War was necessary to bring about the abolition of slavery. Abolishing slavery was morally imperative and necessary, and it's regrettable that it took the Civil War to do it. But it did."

Needless to say, the Civil War, with its 600,000 casualties, would hardly have been necessary if it had been about nothing more than the division of power between the central government and the states, let alone some amorphous "economic reasons." And yet, that is precisely the lesson that will be learned by any aspiring citizen who diligently studies the government-provided model answers to the naturalization test.

The test is not equally agnostic about the causes of other American wars. There is only one correct answer -- "Communism" -- to the question about the United States' "main concern during the Cold War." Other quite plausible answers -- such as great power rivalry, third-world self-determination, or even Russian military expansion -- are evidently unacceptable. Even the ubiquitous "economic reasons" would be marked wrong.

Remarkably, the current version of the citizenship test is not simply an antiquated holdover from an unenlightened time. In fact, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) thoroughly revised and updated it in 2008. The test contains several other incorrect answers, but none that are as egregious as misidentification of the causes of the Civil War.

It would be tempting to think that the Civil War question -- with its absurd alternative answers -- was included only as a sop to the Bush administration's Southern supporters, but President Obama has been in office for over two years, and the test remains unchanged.

On the 150th anniversary of the Civil War, only a die-hard neo-Confederate could claim that secession was motivated by anything other than the desire to protect slavery. As Confederate Vice President Alexander Stephens put it in 1861, the Confederacy's "cornerstone [rested] upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery, subordination to the superior race, is his natural and normal condition."

The Union troops had a different and far more moving ideal, which was immortalized in one of the later stanzas of the Battle Hymn of the Republic: "Let us die to make men free." It is, frankly, an insult to their memory that the USCIS naturalization test fails to recognize the cause for which they gave their lives.

In the Gettysburg Address, President Lincoln eulogized the men who gave "the last full measure of devotion" to bring about the end of slavery, and he asked for the nation's resolve "that these dead shall not have died in vain." Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour has forthrightly honored their sacrifice, and it is not very much to ask the USCIS citizenship test to do the same.

Steven Lubet is the Williams Memorial Professor of Law at Northwestern. He is the author of "Fugitive Justice: Runaways, Rescuers, and Slavery on Trial."
It is far better for the truth to tear my flesh to pieces, then for my soul to wander through darkness in eternal damnation.

Jet: So what kind of woman is she? What's Julia like?
Faye: Ordinary. The kind of beautiful, dangerous ordinary that you just can't leave alone.
Jet: I see.
Faye: Like an angel from the underworld. Or a devil from Paradise.
--------------------------------------------
1 Karma Chameleon point

Admiral Yi

Quote from: jimmy olsen on March 29, 2011, 06:49:46 PM
The test is not equally agnostic about the causes of other American wars. There is only one correct answer -- "Communism" -- to the question about the United States' "main concern during the Cold War." Other quite plausible answers -- such as great power rivalry, third-world self-determination, or even Russian military expansion -- are evidently unacceptable. Even the ubiquitous "economic reasons" would be marked wrong.
Right Steve-o.

jimmy olsen

Quote from: Admiral Yi on March 29, 2011, 06:58:11 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on March 29, 2011, 06:49:46 PM
The test is not equally agnostic about the causes of other American wars. There is only one correct answer -- "Communism" -- to the question about the United States' "main concern during the Cold War." Other quite plausible answers -- such as great power rivalry, third-world self-determination, or even Russian military expansion -- are evidently unacceptable. Even the ubiquitous "economic reasons" would be marked wrong.
Right Steve-o.
Aside from 3rd world self-determination an argument can be easily made for all of those.
It is far better for the truth to tear my flesh to pieces, then for my soul to wander through darkness in eternal damnation.

Jet: So what kind of woman is she? What's Julia like?
Faye: Ordinary. The kind of beautiful, dangerous ordinary that you just can't leave alone.
Jet: I see.
Faye: Like an angel from the underworld. Or a devil from Paradise.
--------------------------------------------
1 Karma Chameleon point

Neil

I do not hate you, nor do I love you, but you are made out of atoms which I can use for something else.

Drakken

How asinine can it be: The South seceded because they wanted to keep their States' right to hold slaves, to pursue them running away even in the farthest regions of the North, and expand slavery into new territories. When the North dared to elect that "nigger-loving" Lincoln who wouldn't allow them to (except keeping their Slaves, Lincoln was of the house of letting slavery wither and die by itself), they run a collective temper tantrum and slammed the door.

Razgovory

The Cold War wasn't an actual war, nor was it exclusively between two powers.
I've given it serious thought. I must scorn the ways of my family, and seek a Japanese woman to yield me my progeny. He shall live in the lands of the east, and be well tutored in his sacred trust to weave the best traditions of Japan and the Sacred South together, until such time as he (or, indeed his house, which will periodically require infusion of both Southern and Japanese bloodlines of note) can deliver to the South it's independence, either in this world or in space.  -Lettow April of 2011

Raz is right. -MadImmortalMan March of 2017

CountDeMoney

Quote from: Drakken on March 29, 2011, 08:44:48 PM
How asinine can it be: The South seceded because they wanted to keep their States' right to hold slaves, to pursue them running away even in the farthest regions of the North, and expand slavery into new territories. When the North dared to elect that "nigger-loving" Lincoln who wouldn't allow them to (except keeping their Slaves, Lincoln was of the house of letting slavery wither and die by itself), they run a collective temper tantrum and slammed the door.

Preach it, brother.

Razgovory

Also they wanted to interfere with with the Postal service to prevent abolitionist documents from reaching the South.
I've given it serious thought. I must scorn the ways of my family, and seek a Japanese woman to yield me my progeny. He shall live in the lands of the east, and be well tutored in his sacred trust to weave the best traditions of Japan and the Sacred South together, until such time as he (or, indeed his house, which will periodically require infusion of both Southern and Japanese bloodlines of note) can deliver to the South it's independence, either in this world or in space.  -Lettow April of 2011

Raz is right. -MadImmortalMan March of 2017


sbr

QuoteThe Union troops had a different and far more moving ideal, which was immortalized in one of the later stanzas of the Battle Hymn of the Republic: "Let us die to make men free." It is, frankly, an insult to their memory that the USCIS naturalization test fails to recognize the cause for which they gave their lives.

Really?  Did that many Union soldiers join and fight to end slavery and free blacks, especially in the first year or two?

The Brain

Do Americans really want to make it 100% official that half the fucking country felt strongly enough about slavery that they fought a huge war for keeping it? Careful what you wish for, Amerikkka.
Women want me. Men want to be with me.

Martinus

Quote from: jimmy olsen on March 29, 2011, 07:44:44 PM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on March 29, 2011, 06:58:11 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on March 29, 2011, 06:49:46 PM
The test is not equally agnostic about the causes of other American wars. There is only one correct answer -- "Communism" -- to the question about the United States' "main concern during the Cold War." Other quite plausible answers -- such as great power rivalry, third-world self-determination, or even Russian military expansion -- are evidently unacceptable. Even the ubiquitous "economic reasons" would be marked wrong.
Right Steve-o.
Aside from 3rd world self-determination an argument can be easily made for all of those.

Is this a multiple choice test or you have to write in the answer?

Razgovory

Quote from: sbr on March 29, 2011, 11:10:18 PM
QuoteThe Union troops had a different and far more moving ideal, which was immortalized in one of the later stanzas of the Battle Hymn of the Republic: "Let us die to make men free." It is, frankly, an insult to their memory that the USCIS naturalization test fails to recognize the cause for which they gave their lives.

Really?  Did that many Union soldiers join and fight to end slavery and free blacks, especially in the first year or two?

Some certainly did.  No idea how many though.
I've given it serious thought. I must scorn the ways of my family, and seek a Japanese woman to yield me my progeny. He shall live in the lands of the east, and be well tutored in his sacred trust to weave the best traditions of Japan and the Sacred South together, until such time as he (or, indeed his house, which will periodically require infusion of both Southern and Japanese bloodlines of note) can deliver to the South it's independence, either in this world or in space.  -Lettow April of 2011

Raz is right. -MadImmortalMan March of 2017

Viking

Quote from: The Brain on March 30, 2011, 12:23:43 AM
Do Americans really want to make it 100% official that half the fucking country felt strongly enough about slavery that they fought a huge war for keeping it? Careful what you wish for, Amerikkka.

1/3 of the country. That's why they lost.
First Maxim - "There are only two amounts, too few and enough."
First Corollary - "You cannot have too many soldiers, only too few supplies."
Second Maxim - "Be willing to exchange a bad idea for a good one."
Second Corollary - "You can only be wrong or agree with me."

A terrorist which starts a slaughter quoting Locke, Burke and Mill has completely missed the point.
The fact remains that the only person or group to applaud the Norway massacre are random Islamists.

Admiral Yi

Quote from: jimmy olsen on March 29, 2011, 07:44:44 PM
Aside from 3rd world self-determination an argument can be easily made for all of those.

Aside from 3rd world self-determination they're all different characterizations of the same thing.