TV/Movies Megathread

[Malthus]

Also, regarding Disney still making good films, I liked Zootopia quite a bit.

Zootopia was great, I also liked Coco. But the new is few and far between in their line-up, compared to how many they make.

[Malthus]

Hmm. I am disappointed in the film viewing audience. Or was the money made in china? can I blame china? i'd be ok with that

But I guess I shouldn't be surprised, things go in cycles. a bunch of hollywood movies are just remakes 9even some of their great movies)

Movies in general are losing out in terms of originality to TV, have been for years.

[frunk]

Zootopia was great, I also liked Coco. But the new is few and far between in their line-up, compared to how many they make.

Coco was Pixar.

[Valmy]

Hmm. I am disappointed in the film viewing audience. Or was the money made in china? can I blame china? i'd be ok with that

But I guess I shouldn't be surprised, things go in cycles. a bunch of hollywood movies are just remakes 9even some of their great movies)

Movies in general are losing out in terms of originality to TV, have been for years.

I think the streaming services and their competition for exclusive shows is slowly strangling the gold age of TV. Golden gooses will be flogged to death.

But hey, just like with movies, plenty of good stuff will still be made and really that is they only thing that really gets remembered.

[Malthus]

Zootopia was great, I also liked Coco. But the new is few and far between in their line-up, compared to how many they make.

Coco was Pixar.

Isn't Pixar owned by Disney though?

[dps]

I can't wait for the live action uncanny valley grotesque that will be Pinocchio. 

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/tom-hanks-play-geppetto-disneys-live-action-pinocchio-1164553

Interestingly, IMDB says that Roberto Benigni is playing Geppetto.  At least they aren't letting him play Pinocchio this time.

[celedhring]

Zootopia was great, I also liked Coco. But the new is few and far between in their line-up, compared to how many they make.

Coco was Pixar.

Isn't Pixar owned by Disney though?

They have lots of creative control, same for Marvel. Lucasfilm they keep on a shorter leash.

[Valmy]

Isn't Pixar owned by Disney though?

Yes. That is why Pixar produces so much sequel garbage.

[frunk]

Isn't Pixar owned by Disney though?

Marvel Studios (particularly the MCU) and Pixar have a lot of freedom compared to the rest of the Disney empire, so there's usually a distinction drawn between the two.

[Admiral Yi]

Watched The Ballad of Buster Scruggs.  The Cohens certainly like to get their weird on once in a while.

[Habbaku]

Watched The Ballad of Buster Scruggs.  The Cohens certainly like to get their weird on once in a while.

I seem to recall once that either they or some of their friends commented that they make Hollywood movies that make tons of money so that, every once in a while, they can make something insane and indulgent that they really like.

[celedhring]

Isn't Pixar owned by Disney though?

Yes. That is why Pixar produces so much sequel garbage.

They are one of the few studios (actually, maybe the only one*) that routinely come up with great original material though. Coco was great, and there are no sequels (yet) in their upcoming schedule. I see the sequels as sure-fire cash grabs to keep the Disney people happy.


*There's Laika too. Some of their films are great (in particular, I loved Kubo & the two strings), but they all fail commercially.

[frunk]

There's Studio Ghibli, although I suppose you could quibble over the routinely part.

[celedhring]

There's Studio Ghibli, although I suppose you could quibble over the routinely part.

Was talking Hollywood only. I'm sure there are non-American studios out there pumping out nice stuff consistently, but can't really pretend I know many of them.

Interestingly all 3 examples so far (Pixar, Laika, Ghibli) are animation.

[Josquius]

Good Omens was pretty good.
Shame there's no sequel.