News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

New political tool: hunger strikes

Started by BVN, April 10, 2009, 04:10:20 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

BVN

QuoteBolivian President Evo Morales has said he will refuse to eat until the upper house of parliament, the Senate, passes a new electoral law

The opposition-controlled Senate is blocking a bill that would give greater political power to Bolivia's indigenous majority, to which Mr Morales belongs.
Fourteen special indigenous electoral districts would be created in places where Indian groups are in a minority.

The opposition says the bill would help the re-election of Mr Morales.

QuoteWe think that the president is blackmailing via the strike

Walter Guiteras
Opposition senator

Tensions flared last week when members of the governing party, which controls the lower house, clashed with the opposition over the bill.
The Andean nation has been marked by decades of political upheaval.

A new constitution designed to give more rights and a greater share of the land and resources to the country's indigenous majority was approved by more than 60% of voters in late January.

But tensions and deep division between the poorer, indigenous majority located in the highlands, and the wealthier and mixed-race lowlanders, have increased since Mr Morales took office three years ago, the BBC's Andres Schipani reports from La Paz.

'Blackmail'

"Faced with the negligence of a group of neoliberal lawmakers, we have to take this step," Mr Morales told reporters at the presidential palace in La Paz on Thursday.

A joint session of the Bolivian Congress saw heated exchanges

"Now is the best time to force opposition senators in the National Congress to approve the new law."
The electoral law would set the next presidential election for 6 December.

Members of the presidential cabinet pledged to join Mr Morales in his hunger protest but a palace spokesman ruled out a solidarity strike, to ensure the country continued to function.

Fernando Mesmer, a member of the influential centre-right opposition party Podemos, dismissed the president's hunger strike as "ridiculous".
He said that the ruling Movement for Socialism wanted to ensure the president's re-election in order to "cover up the massive corruption".

An opposition senator, Walter Guiteras, called Mr Morales' action "shameless".
"Congress is absolutely independent of the executive branch," he said.
"We think that the president is blackmailing via the strike. Hunger strikes can't be used within the logic and dynamics of democracy, within the terms of the coherence of law, to try to get something. It seems absolutely shameless to me."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7993274.stm

What the hell...?

A president going on a hunger strike because the parlement doesn't do what he wants?  :huh:

The Brain

Women want me. Men want to be with me.

Eochaid

It's been a while

The Brain

So it was good enough for Gandhi but isn't for Morales? OK.
Women want me. Men want to be with me.

Eochaid

Quote from: The Brain on April 10, 2009, 04:32:39 AM
So it was good enough for Gandhi but isn't for Morales? OK.

Gandhi wasn't the president of India, a hunger strike is the weapon of the underdog.

This is just blackmail.

Kevin
It's been a while

Viking

While not fat, Evo Morales might benefit from losing a few pounds.
First Maxim - "There are only two amounts, too few and enough."
First Corollary - "You cannot have too many soldiers, only too few supplies."
Second Maxim - "Be willing to exchange a bad idea for a good one."
Second Corollary - "You can only be wrong or agree with me."

A terrorist which starts a slaughter quoting Locke, Burke and Mill has completely missed the point.
The fact remains that the only person or group to applaud the Norway massacre are random Islamists.

The Brain

Quote from: Eochaid on April 10, 2009, 05:35:04 AM
Quote from: The Brain on April 10, 2009, 04:32:39 AM
So it was good enough for Gandhi but isn't for Morales? OK.

Gandhi wasn't the president of India, a hunger strike is the weapon of the underdog.

This is just blackmail.

Kevin

I don't see Gandhi as an underdog in 1947.
Women want me. Men want to be with me.

Crazy_Ivan80

just wait him out: he'll cave or die. Either way is  win for the opposition since dead men can't be re-elected

Eochaid

Quote from: The Brain on April 10, 2009, 05:48:09 AMI don't see Gandhi as an underdog in 1947.

In 1947 Gandhi was not a member of Government and opposed the Government's attitude towards Pakistan.

Kevin
It's been a while

Octavian

Quote from: Viking on April 10, 2009, 05:39:04 AM
While not fat, Evo Morales might benefit from losing a few pounds.

From now on he will be known as Emo Morales.

Let it be known throughout the land!
If you let someone handcuff you, and put a rope around your neck, don't act all surprised if they hang you!

- Eyal Yanilov.

Forget about winning and losing; forget about pride and pain. Let your opponent graze your skin and you smash into his flesh; let him smash into your flesh and you fracture his bones; let him fracture your bones and you take his life. Do not be concerned with escaping safely - lay your life before him.

- Bruce Lee

Martinus

I wonder if later he could put the MPs in prison for "endangering the life of the Head of State". :P

Caliga

0 Ed Anger Disapproval Points

Martinus


Caliga

0 Ed Anger Disapproval Points