If you could quit your job tomorrow and be financially okay, would you?

Started by merithyn, September 17, 2013, 01:22:52 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Read the OP before voting to see what "financially okay" means.

Ab-so-LUTE-ly!
I'd have to seriously think about it, but probably, yeah
50/50 - I could stay or leave
Not likely
No way! Not nearly enough
No amount is enough. I'd be far too bored.

merithyn

When I say "financially okay", I don't mean that you've won the lottery or that you get a full-pay retirement package. I mean that you would be pulling in about 4 times the poverty line and would stay at that rate until you died.

Would you leave your job?
Yesterday, upon the stair,
I met a man who wasn't there
He wasn't there again today
I wish, I wish he'd go away...

MadBurgerMaker



Barrister

I have kids to raise, and the amount you list is much less than what I currently earn.  So no, not now.
Posts here are my own private opinions.  I do not speak for my employer.

Ideologue

$50,000 a year?  Yeah.  Fuck yeah.

However: I would probably try continue to work in some capacity, just not my non-job job.
Kinemalogue
Current reviews: The 'Burbs (9/10); Gremlins 2: The New Batch (9/10); John Wick: Chapter 2 (9/10); A Cure For Wellness (4/10)

Grey Fox

I don't currently make 4 times the poverty line. I'm willing to get that & still work.
Colonel Caliga is Awesome.

The Brain

Women want me. Men want to be with me.

Ideologue

I did vote "would have to think about it" and by that I mean I'd have to look at the tax implications.

If I'm earning $50k for jack shit, I'm going to be paying the rich person rate for $35/40/45k/$? of tedium.  While taxes are important, I've always felt that they very unfairly impact people who actually work more.  I don't mean are more valuable, but literally labor more severely.  This doesn't really apply here, but there's still a serious disincentive issue.

In any event, what I mean is I'd have to see how much my take-home on my wages would be.  If it's less than $10hr, ha ha, no fucking way.
Kinemalogue
Current reviews: The 'Burbs (9/10); Gremlins 2: The New Batch (9/10); John Wick: Chapter 2 (9/10); A Cure For Wellness (4/10)

Jacob

It sort of depends what you mean...

I might take a look at my financial obligations, this guaranteed income, and my free time and attempt to grow that into something larger.

If the question is - would you take $40K - $60K/year (depending on how we define poverty line; this could also apply to an individual) and not earn any other income for the rest of your life, then no.

If the question is - would you take that amount and not ever draw a salary again, except from a company you own, then yes (assuming my wife can still work, if not, then fuck no).

merithyn

Quote from: Jacob on September 17, 2013, 01:35:41 PM

If the question is - would you take $40K - $60K/year (depending on how we define poverty line; this could also apply to an individual) and not earn any other income for the rest of your life, then no.

This
Yesterday, upon the stair,
I met a man who wasn't there
He wasn't there again today
I wish, I wish he'd go away...

Eddie Teach

I've never had a job that either payed that much or was enjoyable, so definitely.
To sleep, perchance to dream. But in that sleep of death, what dreams may come?

Jacob

Quote from: merithyn on September 17, 2013, 01:37:28 PM
Quote from: Jacob on September 17, 2013, 01:35:41 PM

If the question is - would you take $40K - $60K/year (depending on how we define poverty line; this could also apply to an individual) and not earn any other income for the rest of your life, then no.

This

Okay.

I'll go vote no then.

Jacob

... or rather "not likely" 'cause I like to hedge my bets a bit.

MadImmortalMan

Not if it's free. If I'm drawing that income from the investing I've done then yes.
"Stability is destabilizing." --Hyman Minsky

"Complacency can be a self-denying prophecy."
"We have nothing to fear but lack of fear itself." --Larry Summers

crazy canuck

Based on Jacob's clarification of the question.  No way.  Not nearly enough.