News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

The EU thread

Started by Tamas, April 16, 2021, 08:10:41 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Tonitrus

I would think a civil war would require some pretty motivated sections/factions among the population.  The only segment of the population that I see would likely be highly motivated are those that are even more extreme than Putin and the current government.  Given that most of them are probably already in/adjacent to the security apparatuses, I tend to think that a "civil war" would limited to those echelons of power for control of said apparatuses.

How messy that would turn out to be would depend on how overlapped they are with the military, or with each other, but my impression is that there are plenty of separate Russian security organizations around for things to get slightly messy.

I wonder if Putin has a posthumous "succession plan" (which could be easily ignored, of course), or if he is ok with everything rolling into chaos when he croaks. :hmm:

Zoupa

Quote from: Tamas on December 12, 2025, 04:37:00 PMYeah one remarkable thing for me during the Ukrainian Kursk incursion was the seeming complete passivity of the local Russian population. The Ukrainian civilians tried to resist initially before being discouraged by the Russians but I didn't see any such reports from the Russian peasants.

russians have this weird national conception, or lack thereof. Borders don't really mean anything for the rusky mir. If somehow in a peace deal Ukraine got Kursk and Belgorod, there'd be very little reaction from the population in the rest of russia. There'd be no civil resistance in the new Ukrainian regions. The population is incredibly depoliticized, by design.

Tamas

Quote from: Tonitrus on December 12, 2025, 04:53:22 PMI would think a civil war would require some pretty motivated sections/factions among the population.  The only segment of the population that I see would likely be highly motivated are those that are even more extreme than Putin and the current government.  Given that most of them are probably already in/adjacent to the security apparatuses, I tend to think that a "civil war" would limited to those echelons of power for control of said apparatuses.

How messy that would turn out to be would depend on how overlapped they are with the military, or with each other, but my impression is that there are plenty of separate Russian security organizations around for things to get slightly messy.

I wonder if Putin has a posthumous "succession plan" (which could be easily ignored, of course), or if he is ok with everything rolling into chaos when he croaks. :hmm:

A convincing argument I have heard from analysts is that de ody like Putin would not name an heir because a clear heir is also a potential rival, and also a clear succession means it is safer for the elites to get rid of him.

Zoupa

Also I don't think our job is to worry about what happens inside russian borders once they lose or Putin dies or whatever. Our job is to make sure Ukraine wins. What happens inside russia is for russians to figure out. It's not like we did anything when Prigozin was 100 miles from Moscow.

Jacob

Quote from: Zoupa on December 12, 2025, 05:22:39 PMAlso I don't think our job is to worry about what happens inside russian borders once they lose or Putin dies or whatever. Our job is to make sure Ukraine wins. What happens inside russia is for russians to figure out. It's not like we did anything when Prigozin was 100 miles from Moscow.

I generally agree. That said, I reckon there are two motivations for meddling in a post-Putin Russian collapse:

  • Let's try to minimize the risk of nukes ending up going bad places.
  • There's a way for my particular clique to make a bunch of money.

I expect the appetite for "let us try to help make a better Russia for Russians via democracy and economic growth" to be fairly low.

Tonitrus

Quote from: Jacob on December 12, 2025, 05:29:59 PM
Quote from: Zoupa on December 12, 2025, 05:22:39 PMAlso I don't think our job is to worry about what happens inside russian borders once they lose or Putin dies or whatever. Our job is to make sure Ukraine wins. What happens inside russia is for russians to figure out. It's not like we did anything when Prigozin was 100 miles from Moscow.

I generally agree. That said, I reckon there are two motivations for meddling in a post-Putin Russian collapse:

  • Let's try to minimize the risk of nukes ending up going bad places.
  • There's a way for my particular clique to make a bunch of money.

I expect the appetite for "let us try to help make a better Russia for Russians via democracy and economic growth" to be fairly low.

Agreed...certainly far lower than after the fall of the USSR.


Tonitrus

Quote from: Zoupa on December 12, 2025, 05:22:39 PMAlso I don't think our job is to worry about what happens inside russian borders once they lose or Putin dies or whatever. Our job is to make sure Ukraine wins. What happens inside russia is for russians to figure out. It's not like we did anything when Prigozin was 100 miles from Moscow.

At least except or insofar as how those two things might be connected.

That said, excluding outside direct intervention, I don't see how Ukraine wins (if defined as a return to 2022/2014 borders) except from internal Russian disruption.  And a strong risk that a new government might feel a need to intensify the war or take more desperate measures to accelerate things.

Right now, the Russia/Ukraine war feels an imperfect analogy of the American Civil War might apply...in the sense of the power/population imbalance (certainly not any of the moral/slavery elements). Russia got off to an energetic and sloppy start, got their nose bloodied a lot, and then switched to a slow, methodical ramping up of manpower.  And realizing that they throwing all their armor/tanks was ineffective, went to matching and exceeding Ukraine's capabilities in small drone warfare. 

The Kursk offensive was a king of Gettysburg...and I am not sure if Russia would still be in the Peninsula campaign or slogging through the equivalent of Grant's Overland campaign...and we certainly haven't seen a Battle of Atlanta yet.  But I fear it may be coming.

Jacob

Big Lithium deposit found in Germany: https://dailygalaxy.com/2026/01/germany-discovers-massive-lithium-deposit/

... well, it's been found for a while. I guess the story is that it's moving closer to being a productive deposit.

Sheilbh

So I have family in Cornwall. They own a small holding - one horse, a few pigs, many dogs.

A local guy is buying up all the land around them - at a very high price - and they can't think that there's any real development potential for it.

Their theory is lithium because there's been big lithium finds in Cornwall. Weirdly like that German story I think a lot of it has been found with the old in mines too.

(FWIW my family's assumption is that he'll make a big offer for them at some point to at which point they retire to a house by the sea as running a small-holding is really hard work :lol:)
Let's bomb Russia!

Zanza

Quote from: Jacob on January 07, 2026, 07:05:11 PMBig Lithium deposit found in Germany: https://dailygalaxy.com/2026/01/germany-discovers-massive-lithium-deposit/

... well, it's been found for a while. I guess the story is that it's moving closer to being a productive deposit.
Doubtful that it's competitive. And that's just one piece of the value chain. There is no refinery capacity or cell factories.

Crazy_Ivan80

Quote from: Zanza on January 08, 2026, 12:44:33 AM
Quote from: Jacob on January 07, 2026, 07:05:11 PMBig Lithium deposit found in Germany: https://dailygalaxy.com/2026/01/germany-discovers-massive-lithium-deposit/

... well, it's been found for a while. I guess the story is that it's moving closer to being a productive deposit.
Doubtful that it's competitive. And that's just one piece of the value chain. There is no refinery capacity or cell factories.

With the way things are going it'll be about strategic resources rather than profitability. But with the rest of the chain it doesn't matter of course.
Eu should also leverage our recycling tech much more.

crazy canuck

Quote from: Sheilbh on January 07, 2026, 07:39:46 PMSo I have family in Cornwall. They own a small holding - one horse, a few pigs, many dogs.

A local guy is buying up all the land around them - at a very high price - and they can't think that there's any real development potential for it.

Their theory is lithium because there's been big lithium finds in Cornwall. Weirdly like that German story I think a lot of it has been found with the old in mines too.

(FWIW my family's assumption is that he'll make a big offer for them at some point to at which point they retire to a house by the sea as running a small-holding is really hard work :lol:)

And what will happen to the dogs  :mad:
Awarded 17 Zoupa points

In several surveys, the overwhelming first choice for what makes Canada unique is multiculturalism. This, in a world collapsing into stupid, impoverishing hatreds, is the distinctly Canadian national project.

Crazy_Ivan80

those could run for parliament?


Tamas