This is the kind of thing that could only happen in New York, I guess :)
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/427075_10100216771260516_6509830_42016702_977299453_n.jpg)
"Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned." :nerd:
Are you kidding? She's as happy right now as she could possibly be. Look at all the drama. Chicks love drama.
Quote from: Admiral Yi on January 31, 2012, 12:11:20 PM
"Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned." :nerd:
Thank you for catching that, so I didn't have to.
if you wanna be nitpicky it's really
"Heaven has no rage like love to hatred turned. Nor Hell a fury, like a woman scorned"
well, with modern spelling.
Quote from: Neil on January 31, 2012, 12:14:32 PM
Are you kidding? She's as happy right now as she could possibly be. Look at all the drama. Chicks love drama.
Yes, they do, and yes now, she's happy. But before the message, she was furious ;)
Another possibility is that the ad's a fake, put up by the company that owns the billboards to plug advertising space. ;)
Lack of personally identifying details ...
Quote from: Malthus on January 31, 2012, 04:33:06 PM
Another possibility is that the ad's a fake, put up by the company that owns the billboards to plug advertising space. ;)
Lack of personally identifying details ...
Damn, we are both so cynical; I was going to suggest it was her shot at 15 seconds of fame. :cheers:
Quote from: Malthus on January 31, 2012, 04:33:06 PM
Another possibility is that the ad's a fake, put up by the company that owns the billboards to plug advertising space. ;)
Lack of personally identifying details ...
BINGO! It's a fake.
http://www.snopes.com/love/revenge/emily.asp Fortunately not all Canadians are that gullible.
Not only is a fake, but it's a fake from five years ago.
Ed's rules of marriage:
-Never cede complete control of your finances. Maintain at least 50% of your paycheck for your purposes. She can't handle that, dump the bitch.
-Never EVER hand over per-marriage bank accounts to the spouse or merge them with hers. NEVER
Quote from: Ed Anger on January 31, 2012, 07:29:50 PM
Ed's rules of marriage:
-Never cede complete control of your finances. Maintain at least 50% of your paycheck for your purposes. She can't handle that, dump the bitch.
-Never EVER hand over per-marriage bank accounts to the spouse or merge them with hers. NEVER
Fuck that.
A marriage is a 50/50 partnership.
I do maintain my own credit card, but that is it. Everything else is joint.
You're a lawyer so you probably know all the best ways to hide your assets should the need arise :D
How on earth were people reading this fake blog by a woman just muttering about mundane life in the first place?
Lazy PR not to change each billboard just a little.
I've never heard of the TV show concerned.
Quote from: HVC on January 31, 2012, 08:12:03 PM
You're a lawyer so you probably know all the best ways to hide your assets should the need arise :D
Nein.
I am all in on this marriage.
I just know that my sweetie knows she'll never do better than me. :cool:
I do hope you're right. But you know, just in case, start some off shore accounts :D
Quote from: HVC on January 31, 2012, 08:18:30 PM
I do hope you're right. But you know, just in case, start some off shore accounts :D
Like I said - fuck that.
Once you start thinking like that your marriage is over.
Yea there's such a thing as a self-fulfilling prediction.
I stand by my rules.
Quote from: Barrister on January 31, 2012, 08:20:53 PM
Quote from: HVC on January 31, 2012, 08:18:30 PM
I do hope you're right. But you know, just in case, start some off shore accounts :D
Like I said - fuck that.
Once you start thinking like that your marriage is over.
I go further than Ed but my marriage is going strong :contract:
Of course your marriage is strong Mono, you are contractually obligated.
Quote from: viper37 on January 31, 2012, 12:09:15 PM
This is the kind of thing that could only happen in New York, I guess :)
:huh:
Quote from: garbon on January 31, 2012, 11:43:27 PM
Quote from: viper37 on January 31, 2012, 12:09:15 PM
This is the kind of thing that could only happen in New York, I guess :)
:huh:
Well the signs appeared in other major metropolitan areas, so who knows.
I believe in 100% control of my assets. Which is why I am 100% divorce-proof.
Quote from: CountDeMoney on February 01, 2012, 12:40:54 AM
I believe in 100% control of my assets. Which is why I am 100% divorce-proof.
I hate to say it Money, but...
you are also 100% alone.
:console:
Quote from: Barrister on February 01, 2012, 01:26:22 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on February 01, 2012, 12:40:54 AM
I believe in 100% control of my assets. Which is why I am 100% divorce-proof.
I hate to say it Money, but...
you are also 100% alone.
:console:
I prefer to think of it as 100% sabateur-proof. There will never be any sappers behind my wire, man.
Quote from: CountDeMoney on February 01, 2012, 01:32:50 AM
Quote from: Barrister on February 01, 2012, 01:26:22 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on February 01, 2012, 12:40:54 AM
I believe in 100% control of my assets. Which is why I am 100% divorce-proof.
I hate to say it Money, but...
you are also 100% alone.
:console:
I prefer to think of it as 100% sabateur-proof. There will never be any sappers behind my wire, man.
Hey man - you can think of it however makes you get through the night. :hug:
Can't help it if I am strong, and you are weak.
Quote from: CountDeMoney on February 01, 2012, 01:36:17 AM
Can't help it if I am strong, and you are weak.
Really, I don't mean to be cruel...
But when my little guy goes "daddy! Daddy!" with a big grin on his face when I come to pick him up I certainly don't feel weak. :cool:
Of course as is the way with little guys, immediately after going "daddy!" he goes back to playing with matchbox cars, and cries when I try and take him away from them. <_<
Thanks for the collateral damage, man.
Quote from: Ideologue on February 01, 2012, 01:56:08 AM
Thanks for the collateral damage, man.
The conceits of breeders know no bounds. LULZ MY LIFE HAS MOR VALU THAN YOURS PWN3D
Quote from: viper37 on January 31, 2012, 12:09:15 PM
This is the kind of thing that could only happen in New York, I guess :)
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/427075_10100216771260516_6509830_42016702_977299453_n.jpg)
One of the reasons "NOT" to have a joint bank account.
I'm with BB and CdM on the financial arrangements, both make sense. What doesn't make sense to me is "sharing" one's life with someone and not sharing the finances. Ah well, 25 years coming up for me and the missus this year, nearly all our arrangements are based around our marriage and children, I now find it hard to imagine the single state :hmm:
Quote from: Ideologue on February 01, 2012, 01:56:08 AM
Thanks for the collateral damage, man.
Weren't you planning on getting a vastectomy? :unsure:
Quote from: HVC on January 31, 2012, 08:18:30 PM
I do hope you're right. But you know, just in case, start some off shore accounts :D
Nothing like imbezzeling your own finances. :lol:
Of course, on the flip side...allowing my ex-wife to run off with the money made it far, far, easier for her to go.
Quote from: PDH on February 01, 2012, 08:22:26 AM
Of course, on the flip side...allowing my ex-wife to run off with the money made it far, far, easier for her to go.
That would enrage me and I'd hunt her down.
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fbigdaddyseashell.files.wordpress.com%2F2007%2F12%2Fjavierbardem2-no-country-for-old-men.jpg&hash=3c5643bf4e28f7aea32e9b7eddfd4a50b5197f71)
Quote from: Ed Anger on February 01, 2012, 08:34:53 AM
That would enrage me and I'd hunt her down.
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fbigdaddyseashell.files.wordpress.com%2F2007%2F12%2Fjavierbardem2-no-country-for-old-men.jpg&hash=3c5643bf4e28f7aea32e9b7eddfd4a50b5197f71)
If you love someone, set them free.
If they stay, they are yours forever.
If they leave,
hunt them down with extreme prejudice.
Quote from: Richard Hakluyt on February 01, 2012, 03:19:16 AM
What doesn't make sense to me is "sharing" one's life with someone and not sharing the finances.
Because it can bite you in the ass if you don't end up sharing your whole life?
Quote from: Malthus on January 31, 2012, 04:33:06 PM
Another possibility is that the ad's a fake, put up by the company that owns the billboards to plug advertising space. ;)
Lack of personally identifying details ...
doesn't matter, it's a great ad. though I'd swear I saw something like that somewhere.
Quote from: CountDeMoney on February 01, 2012, 12:40:54 AM
I believe in 100% control of my assets. Which is why I am 100% divorce-proof.
it's the only way to live dude.
Quote from: CountDeMoney on February 01, 2012, 01:36:17 AM
Can't help it if I am strong, and you are weak.
I can't wait till he divorces.
Quote from: Martinus on February 01, 2012, 10:43:40 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on February 01, 2012, 01:36:17 AM
Can't help it if I am strong, and you are weak.
I can't wait till he divorces.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7QtYGsqbbM (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7QtYGsqbbM)
Quote from: Ed Anger on January 31, 2012, 07:29:50 PM
Ed's rules of marriage:
-Never cede complete control of your finances. Maintain at least 50% of your paycheck for your purposes. She can't handle that, dump the bitch.
-Never EVER hand over per-marriage bank accounts to the spouse or merge them with hers. NEVER
Are you against sharing finances with your wife if she brings more assets to the relationship than you do?
Quote from: Jacob on February 01, 2012, 11:24:37 AM
Are you against sharing finances with your wife if she brings more assets to the relationship than you do?
Considering he bought her at Gap Kids, I doubt that ever came into play.
Quote from: CountDeMoney on February 01, 2012, 11:38:58 AM
Quote from: Jacob on February 01, 2012, 11:24:37 AM
Are you against sharing finances with your wife if she brings more assets to the relationship than you do?
Considering he bought her at Gap Kids, I doubt that ever came into play.
Correct!
Didn't she at least have a few bucks saved from the Tooth Fairy?
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on February 01, 2012, 03:56:55 AM
Quote from: Ideologue on February 01, 2012, 01:56:08 AM
Thanks for the collateral damage, man.
Weren't you planning on getting a vastectomy? :unsure:
I don't need one. People who accidentally cum inside chicks are dumb.
But no, I planned on never having a biological kid, short of Gattaca technology, because I don't want some innocent to be potentially saddled with depression. Also there was some concern Korea might not have been capable of having kids, and in any event she didn't want to get knocked up, so we were going to adopt instead once we got financially stable.
Well, even forgetting the obvious problem with that, financial stability is something I'll basically never have, because I doubt I'll ever be rich, and even if I get a decent job at some point, I'll always be in debt, till the day I die, or ten or twenty five years out, whichever comes first. I doubt I would be allowed to adopt. There's also the question of whether I'll ever get a new permanent girlfriend. Or temporary girlfriend. Let alone one whom I feel is capable of helping me raise a kid. if the prospect came up, however, I wouldn't be opposed to being a stepfather to an existing child.
In any event, I'm more qualified to be the uncle you should have, who is nice, but demonstrates what not to do with your life. Heh, although my sister will probably never have kids either, so my father's line is basically dead--declared only 25 years out.
Quote from: Ideologue on February 01, 2012, 04:07:15 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on February 01, 2012, 03:56:55 AM
Quote from: Ideologue on February 01, 2012, 01:56:08 AM
Thanks for the collateral damage, man.
Weren't you planning on getting a vastectomy? :unsure:
I don't need one. People who accidentally cum inside chicks are dumb.
that's the line of reasoning that leads to being a baby daddy. condoms. they're your friend.
Condoms are for sailors and whores. They are not for people in relationships, who don't have premature ejaculation problems. You realize that my failure rate is 0 out of about 200 trials*, right?
*Or maybe a bit less. When I was keeping count, I counted blowjobs as .5. But you take the point.
Quote from: HVC on February 01, 2012, 04:12:06 PM
Quote from: Ideologue on February 01, 2012, 04:07:15 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on February 01, 2012, 03:56:55 AM
Quote from: Ideologue on February 01, 2012, 01:56:08 AM
Thanks for the collateral damage, man.
Weren't you planning on getting a vastectomy? :unsure:
I don't need one. People who accidentally cum inside chicks are dumb.
that's the line of reasoning that leads to being a baby daddy. condoms. they're your friend.
Yeah not surprising that Ide would adopt such a foolish method.
Quote from: Ideologue on February 01, 2012, 04:16:52 PM
Condoms are for sailors and whores. They are not for people in relationships, who don't have premature ejaculation problems. You realize that my failure rate is 0 out of about 200 trials*, right?
*Or maybe a bit less. When I was keeping count, I counted blowjobs as .5. But you take the point.
pre-cum, drunk nights, oops moments. they never happen until they do. If you think your school loan is taking a hit to your finances wait until you add a baby.
Pre-cum does not, or should not, contain sperm in any significant quantity unless one has not urinated between ejaculations, and even then it's not exactly a heavy load. That it does in an old wives' tale. I have a study. I also have my experience.
Drunkenness makes it all the more difficult to ejaculate. I've never come
close through vaginal sex while intoxicated, even the first couple of times; and maybe only about two dozen times while sober. I'd say at most three times where it was a near-run thing.
Thus even sober, "oops moments" strike me as highly unlikely, given the above.
Also, conception is not ensured even with complete failure of all safety procedures.
I will concede: it's better to use a condom when having sex with a partner for the first time or two, to test the waters (she might have some kind of dynamite vagina, one wouldn't know). I would not rely solely on my experience and discipline in that situation (anymore -_- ); although there are of course other, more compelling, reasons to use barrier birth control in that situation, anyway.
Quote from: garbonYeah not surprising that Ide would adopt such a foolish method.
Supported by science.
Granted, I would like to have a greater sample size than 6.