Languish.org

General Category => Off the Record => Topic started by: Martinus on July 04, 2009, 06:00:34 AM

Title: Hey heteros, what's your "no fats, no fems" equivalent?
Post by: Martinus on July 04, 2009, 06:00:34 AM
Ok, so as far as gay online dating goes, the most common mantra is "no fats, no fems" (i.e. no fat or effeminate guys). I have seen it in Poland, Belgium, UK etc. The other most common requirement is "Must be between [here enter age between X-10 and X where X is the poster's age]". :P

So how is it with you, heteros? What are the constants? :P
Title: Re: Hey heteros, what's your "no fats, no fems" equivalent?
Post by: Norgy on July 04, 2009, 06:08:16 AM
I'm not sure, Marty.

Maybe BBW/black/white/skinny...

My only constant is D-cup plus.  :P
Title: Re: Hey heteros, what's your "no fats, no fems" equivalent?
Post by: DisturbedPervert on July 04, 2009, 06:09:26 AM
Vagina + pulse
Title: Re: Hey heteros, what's your "no fats, no fems" equivalent?
Post by: Norgy on July 04, 2009, 06:18:15 AM
Quote from: DisturbedPervert on July 04, 2009, 06:09:26 AM
Vagina + pulse

Heh
Title: Re: Hey heteros, what's your "no fats, no fems" equivalent?
Post by: Josquius on July 04, 2009, 06:39:05 AM
Fat is my big put off. When drunk though I've came mighty close to breaking this until better judgment clicked in- resulting in one occasion in hiking 3 miles home through a snow storm just to escape.

And x-10 to x is not at all a rule. If they're 35, hot and willing I'd do it.
Title: Re: Hey heteros, what's your "no fats, no fems" equivalent?
Post by: Razgovory on July 04, 2009, 07:10:26 AM
This seems silly because there is nothing more effeminate then wanting to fuck a guy.
Title: Re: Hey heteros, what's your "no fats, no fems" equivalent?
Post by: CountDeMoney on July 04, 2009, 07:15:38 AM
Quote from: Martinus on July 04, 2009, 06:00:34 AM
Ok, so as far as gay online dating goes, the most common mantra is "no fats, no fems" (i.e. no fat or effeminate guys). I have seen it in Poland, Belgium, UK etc. The other most common requirement is "Must be between [here enter age between X-10 and X where X is the poster's age]". :P

So how is it with you, heteros? What are the constants? :P

Height/Weight proportionate. :lol:

Of course, for hetero women, it's "6' tall or more".  Cunts.
Title: Re: Hey heteros, what's your "no fats, no fems" equivalent?
Post by: Norgy on July 04, 2009, 07:15:54 AM
Was Plato effiminate? I think not. He is the father of all authoritarianism and racism, yet he enjoyed a nice teen boy ass as much as the next bearded philosopher.
Title: Re: Hey heteros, what's your "no fats, no fems" equivalent?
Post by: Norgy on July 04, 2009, 07:17:00 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on July 04, 2009, 07:15:38 AM


Height/Weight proportionate. :lol:

Of course, for hetero women, it's "6' tall or more".  Cunts.

As a big boobs man, I can easily take a bit of overweight. As long as we're not talking Berlin Wall ass.
Title: Re: Hey heteros, what's your "no fats, no fems" equivalent?
Post by: Razgovory on July 04, 2009, 07:21:59 AM
Quote from: Norgy on July 04, 2009, 07:15:54 AM
Was Plato effiminate? I think not. He is the father of all authoritarianism and racism, yet he enjoyed a nice teen boy ass as much as the next bearded philosopher.

Oh I bet he put on his best chiton and hung around bars down by the docks to pick up sailors.  He was probably the J. Edgar Hoover or ancient greece.
Title: Re: Hey heteros, what's your "no fats, no fems" equivalent?
Post by: Razgovory on July 04, 2009, 07:22:35 AM
Quote from: Norgy on July 04, 2009, 07:17:00 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on July 04, 2009, 07:15:38 AM


Height/Weight proportionate. :lol:

Of course, for hetero women, it's "6' tall or more".  Cunts.

As a big boobs man, I can easily take a bit of overweight. As long as we're not talking Berlin Wall ass.

We all can learn alot from you Norgy.
Title: Re: Hey heteros, what's your "no fats, no fems" equivalent?
Post by: Caliga on July 04, 2009, 07:32:10 AM
Quote from: Norgy on July 04, 2009, 07:17:00 AM
As a big boobs man, I can easily take a bit of overweight. As long as we're not talking Berlin Wall ass.
:thumbsup:
Title: Re: Hey heteros, what's your "no fats, no fems" equivalent?
Post by: Martinus on July 04, 2009, 07:35:45 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on July 04, 2009, 07:15:38 AM
Quote from: Martinus on July 04, 2009, 06:00:34 AM
Ok, so as far as gay online dating goes, the most common mantra is "no fats, no fems" (i.e. no fat or effeminate guys). I have seen it in Poland, Belgium, UK etc. The other most common requirement is "Must be between [here enter age between X-10 and X where X is the poster's age]". :P

So how is it with you, heteros? What are the constants? :P

Height/Weight proportionate. :lol:

Of course, for hetero women, it's "6' tall or more".  Cunts.
:lol:

Btw, are homos elsewhere also shorter than the average? I mean, here in Poland 90% of homos are shorter than me, and most of them are significantly shorter (I'm about 6' tall). This unfortunately translates into size of their package too.

A guy I dated recently had such a small wiener it looked like my middle finger. I tried giving him a handjob and he like came without me even realising it's over.  <_<
Title: Re: Hey heteros, what's your "no fats, no fems" equivalent?
Post by: Neil on July 04, 2009, 07:39:51 AM
How can gays say 'no fems', given that gay men are effeminate?
Title: Re: Hey heteros, what's your "no fats, no fems" equivalent?
Post by: Martinus on July 04, 2009, 07:40:41 AM
Oh another thing. Are heteros also so fucking hyperactive when it comes to texting? I mean, I treat texting like non-instant communication (akin to e-mails). I.e. unless from the context it looks like it's urgent, I do not feel a need to reply (or get a reply) immediately after receiving/sending a message.

However, many homos seem to disagree.

A guy I was dating recently was all:

8:30 a.m. "Hey, what's up?"

Me: scrambling around my flat, getting ready for work, taking shower, trying to get my shirt ironed asap, putting stuff into the dishwasher, setting up laundry for while I'm at work...

8:44 a.m. "I see you do not reply. I guess you do not want to meet anymore."

WTF.
Title: Re: Hey heteros, what's your "no fats, no fems" equivalent?
Post by: Martinus on July 04, 2009, 07:41:28 AM
Quote from: Neil on July 04, 2009, 07:39:51 AM
How can gays say 'no fems', given that gay men are effeminate?
Not really. The visible ones are and they are turn-offs to most people. People who met me can (hopefully) confirm I'm not effeminate for example. :P
Title: Re: Hey heteros, what's your "no fats, no fems" equivalent?
Post by: Cerr on July 04, 2009, 07:45:52 AM
Quote from: Martinus on July 04, 2009, 07:41:28 AM
Quote from: Neil on July 04, 2009, 07:39:51 AM
How can gays say 'no fems', given that gay men are effeminate?
Not really. The visible ones are and they are turn-offs to most people. People who met me can (hopefully) confirm I'm not effeminate for example. :P
Didn't you say that you wear chokers, sweater vests and white jeans?  :P
Title: Re: Hey heteros, what's your "no fats, no fems" equivalent?
Post by: Martinus on July 04, 2009, 07:46:30 AM
Quote from: Cerr on July 04, 2009, 07:45:52 AM
Quote from: Martinus on July 04, 2009, 07:41:28 AM
Quote from: Neil on July 04, 2009, 07:39:51 AM
How can gays say 'no fems', given that gay men are effeminate?
Not really. The visible ones are and they are turn-offs to most people. People who met me can (hopefully) confirm I'm not effeminate for example. :P
Didn't you say that you wear chokers, sweater vests and white jeans?  :P
But not AT THE SAME TIME.  :mad:

But seriously, by 'effeminate' I consider the demeanor, not necessarily clothes. You know, lisp, limp wrist, kind of stuff.
Title: Re: Hey heteros, what's your "no fats, no fems" equivalent?
Post by: Neil on July 04, 2009, 07:54:23 AM
Quote from: Martinus on July 04, 2009, 07:41:28 AM
Quote from: Neil on July 04, 2009, 07:39:51 AM
How can gays say 'no fems', given that gay men are effeminate?
Not really. The visible ones are and they are turn-offs to most people. People who met me can (hopefully) confirm I'm not effeminate for example. :P
The fact that you would, under any circumstances, wear a choker, and the fact that you love the cock are two feminine traits.
Title: Re: Hey heteros, what's your "no fats, no fems" equivalent?
Post by: The Brain on July 04, 2009, 07:56:53 AM
Quote from: Martinus on July 04, 2009, 07:40:41 AM
Oh another thing. Are heteros also so fucking hyperactive when it comes to texting? I mean, I treat texting like non-instant communication (akin to e-mails). I.e. unless from the context it looks like it's urgent, I do not feel a need to reply (or get a reply) immediately after receiving/sending a message.

However, many homos seem to disagree.

A guy I was dating recently was all:

8:30 a.m. "Hey, what's up?"

Me: scrambling around my flat, getting ready for work, taking shower, trying to get my shirt ironed asap, putting stuff into the dishwasher, setting up laundry for while I'm at work...

8:44 a.m. "I see you do not reply. I guess you do not want to meet anymore."

WTF.

Maybe it's not a gay thing but a Polish thing.
Title: Re: Hey heteros, what's your "no fats, no fems" equivalent?
Post by: Cerr on July 04, 2009, 07:59:21 AM
Quote from: Martinus on July 04, 2009, 07:46:30 AM
Quote from: Cerr on July 04, 2009, 07:45:52 AM
Quote from: Martinus on July 04, 2009, 07:41:28 AM
Quote from: Neil on July 04, 2009, 07:39:51 AM
How can gays say 'no fems', given that gay men are effeminate?
Not really. The visible ones are and they are turn-offs to most people. People who met me can (hopefully) confirm I'm not effeminate for example. :P
Didn't you say that you wear chokers, sweater vests and white jeans?  :P
But not AT THE SAME TIME.  :mad:

But seriously, by 'effeminate' I consider the demeanor, not necessarily clothes. You know, lisp, limp wrist, kind of stuff.
Aren't those effiminate mannerisms used consciously or subconsciously to help gay men to identify (and possibly attract) each other? With online dating it probably isn't needed anymore.
Title: Re: Hey heteros, what's your "no fats, no fems" equivalent?
Post by: Josquius on July 04, 2009, 08:03:58 AM
Quote from: Neil on July 04, 2009, 07:39:51 AM
How can gays say 'no fems', given that gay men are effeminate?
Relativity.
Title: Re: Hey heteros, what's your "no fats, no fems" equivalent?
Post by: Norgy on July 04, 2009, 08:14:17 AM
Quote from: Razgovory on July 04, 2009, 07:22:35 AM
Quote from: Norgy on July 04, 2009, 07:17:00 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on July 04, 2009, 07:15:38 AM


Height/Weight proportionate. :lol:

Of course, for hetero women, it's "6' tall or more".  Cunts.

As a big boobs man, I can easily take a bit of overweight. As long as we're not talking Berlin Wall ass.

We all can learn alot from you Norgy.

Not trying to be mean, but yeah, Raz, you seriously need a few hours of fucking.
I suggest a nice warm black prossy, she'll be nice and kind and do your bidding.
Just wear a condom.
Title: Re: Hey heteros, what's your "no fats, no fems" equivalent?
Post by: CountDeMoney on July 04, 2009, 08:36:38 AM
Quote from: Norgy on July 04, 2009, 07:17:00 AMAs a big boobs man, I can easily take a bit of overweight. As long as we're not talking Berlin Wall ass.

Well, there's a difference between "Curvy", "Cherubic and Reubenesque", and "Is that a Japanese whaling fleet following us?"
Title: Re: Hey heteros, what's your "no fats, no fems" equivalent?
Post by: Norgy on July 04, 2009, 08:41:31 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on July 04, 2009, 08:36:38 AM
Quote from: Norgy on July 04, 2009, 07:17:00 AMAs a big boobs man, I can easily take a bit of overweight. As long as we're not talking Berlin Wall ass.

Well, there's a difference between "Curvy", "Cherubic and Reubenesque", and "Is that a Japanese whaling fleet following us?"

Indeed. When she has a bigger gut than you, it's time to eject.

With some cloning, women will grow D-cups AND flat stomachs.

Title: Re: Hey heteros, what's your "no fats, no fems" equivalent?
Post by: garbon on July 04, 2009, 09:59:37 AM
How embarrassing. I'm sorry everyone.
Title: Re: Hey heteros, what's your "no fats, no fems" equivalent?
Post by: Strix on July 04, 2009, 10:13:39 AM
Quote from: Martinus on July 04, 2009, 07:40:41 AM
Oh another thing. Are heteros also so fucking hyperactive when it comes to texting? I mean, I treat texting like non-instant communication (akin to e-mails). I.e. unless from the context it looks like it's urgent, I do not feel a need to reply (or get a reply) immediately after receiving/sending a message.

However, many homos seem to disagree.

A guy I was dating recently was all:

8:30 a.m. "Hey, what's up?"

Me: scrambling around my flat, getting ready for work, taking shower, trying to get my shirt ironed asap, putting stuff into the dishwasher, setting up laundry for while I'm at work...

8:44 a.m. "I see you do not reply. I guess you do not want to meet anymore."

WTF.

It's a chick thing around where I live. They feel that since it isn't verbal that the party receiving the text should be able to answer regardless of what they are doing. The chicks also don't realize it's rude (and dangerous) to start reading/responding to texts in the middle of work.   
Title: Re: Hey heteros, what's your "no fats, no fems" equivalent?
Post by: BuddhaRhubarb on July 04, 2009, 11:56:48 AM
Quote from: Neil on July 04, 2009, 07:39:51 AM
How can gays say 'no fems', given that gay men are effeminate?

:rolleyes:
Title: Re: Hey heteros, what's your "no fats, no fems" equivalent?
Post by: BuddhaRhubarb on July 04, 2009, 11:58:09 AM
oh PS marti the rude phrase you are looking for is "No Fat Chicks"
Title: Re: Hey heteros, what's your "no fats, no fems" equivalent?
Post by: CountDeMoney on July 04, 2009, 01:12:09 PM
Quote from: BuddhaRhubarb on July 04, 2009, 11:58:09 AM
oh PS marti the rude phrase you are looking for is "No Fat Chicks"

How are statements of fact considered rude?
Title: Re: Hey heteros, what's your "no fats, no fems" equivalent?
Post by: Sophie Scholl on July 04, 2009, 01:16:27 PM
Quote from: BuddhaRhubarb on July 04, 2009, 11:58:09 AM
oh PS marti the rude phrase you are looking for is "No Fat Chicks"
Title: Re: Hey heteros, what's your "no fats, no fems" equivalent?
Post by: BuddhaRhubarb on July 04, 2009, 03:08:52 PM
Quote from: Judas Iscariot on July 04, 2009, 01:16:27 PM
Quote from: BuddhaRhubarb on July 04, 2009, 11:58:09 AM
oh PS marti the rude phrase you are looking for is "No Fat Chicks"


:lol: Peter Griffin has never steered me wrong, except that one time he talked me into taking peyote in the middle of a Yanni concert......
Title: Re: Hey heteros, what's your "no fats, no fems" equivalent?
Post by: Siege on July 05, 2009, 12:40:48 AM
Does Martinus looks like Bruno?

Title: Re: Hey heteros, what's your "no fats, no fems" equivalent?
Post by: Viking on July 05, 2009, 01:05:59 AM
No Parents and No Smokers
Title: Re: Hey heteros, what's your "no fats, no fems" equivalent?
Post by: Viking on July 05, 2009, 01:07:57 AM
Quote from: Norgy on July 04, 2009, 08:14:17 AM

Not trying to be mean, but yeah, Raz, you seriously need a few hours of fucking.
I suggest a nice warm black prossy, she'll be nice and kind and do your bidding.
Just wear a condom.

Now that Slargos has move to Trondheim you seem to have taken over his role in the economy?
Title: Re: Hey heteros, what's your "no fats, no fems" equivalent?
Post by: Norgy on July 05, 2009, 02:52:09 AM
 :lol:

No whores in Gjøvik, mate.
Title: Re: Hey heteros, what's your "no fats, no fems" equivalent?
Post by: Viking on July 05, 2009, 03:07:33 AM
Quote from: Norgy on July 05, 2009, 02:52:09 AM
:lol:

No whores in Gjøvik, mate.

but good commuting to oslo :contract:
Title: Re: Hey heteros, what's your "no fats, no fems" equivalent?
Post by: Norgy on July 05, 2009, 03:07:58 AM
 :Embarrass:
Title: Re: Hey heteros, what's your "no fats, no fems" equivalent?
Post by: BuddhaRhubarb on July 05, 2009, 12:10:58 PM
Quote from: Siege on July 05, 2009, 12:40:48 AM
Does Martinus looks like Bruno?



He wishes!
Title: Re: Hey heteros, what's your "no fats, no fems" equivalent?
Post by: garbon on July 05, 2009, 12:45:32 PM
Quote from: BuddhaRhubarb on July 05, 2009, 12:10:58 PM
He wishes!

Wishes or swishes? :unsure:
Title: Re: Hey heteros, what's your "no fats, no fems" equivalent?
Post by: PDH on July 05, 2009, 07:25:25 PM
I am partial to the "no crazy chicks" idea...
Title: Re: Hey heteros, what's your "no fats, no fems" equivalent?
Post by: BuddhaRhubarb on July 05, 2009, 08:23:51 PM
Quote from: garbon on July 05, 2009, 12:45:32 PM
Quote from: BuddhaRhubarb on July 05, 2009, 12:10:58 PM
He wishes!

Wishes or swishes? :unsure:

alittle from column A and a little from Column B... but it's a Polish swish so... :unsure:
Title: Re: Hey heteros, what's your "no fats, no fems" equivalent?
Post by: BuddhaRhubarb on July 05, 2009, 08:24:21 PM
Quote from: PDH on July 05, 2009, 07:25:25 PM
I am partial to the "no crazy chicks" idea...

yeah.
good luck with that.
Title: Re: Hey heteros, what's your "no fats, no fems" equivalent?
Post by: Viking on July 06, 2009, 06:27:33 AM
Quote from: PDH on July 05, 2009, 07:25:25 PM
I am partial to the "no crazy chicks" idea...

how does that help you deal with the batshit ones which look sane for long enough for you to say something stupid?
Title: Re: Hey heteros, what's your "no fats, no fems" equivalent?
Post by: Brazen on July 06, 2009, 06:39:17 AM
It's all relative. No-one older than me, fatter or me or poorer than me would do. Which isn't much of a constraint to be honest :(
Title: Re: Hey heteros, what's your "no fats, no fems" equivalent?
Post by: Viking on July 06, 2009, 06:42:33 AM
Quote from: Brazen on July 06, 2009, 06:39:17 AM
It's all relative. No-one older than me, fatter or me or poorer than me would do. Which isn't much of a constraint to be honest :(

Being female you will reject a guy older than you?


in other news

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/men_shealth/5426895/Men-live-longer-if-they-marry-a-younger-woman.html

Quote
Men 'live longer' if they marry a younger woman
Men are likely to live longer if they marry a younger woman, new research suggests.


A man's chances of dying early are cut by a fifth if their bride is between 15 and 17 years their junior.

The risk of premature death is reduced by 11 per cent if they marry a woman seven to nine years younger.

The study at Germany's Max Planck Institute also found that men marrying older women are more likely to die early.

The results suggest that women do not experience the same benefits of marrying a toy boy or a sugar daddy.

Wives with husbands older or younger by between seven and nine years increase their chances of dying early by 20 per cent.


This rises to 30 per cent if the age difference is close to 15 and 17 years.

Scientists say the figures for men may be the result of natural selection – that only the healthiest, most successful older men are able to attract younger mates.

"Another theory is that a younger woman will care for a man better and therefore he will live longer," said institute spokesman Sven Drefahl.

The study examined deaths between 1990 and 2005 for the entire population of Denmark.

On average in Europe, most men marry women around three years younger.
Title: Re: Hey heteros, what's your "no fats, no fems" equivalent?
Post by: DisturbedPervert on July 06, 2009, 07:01:22 AM
Quote
Scientists say the figures for men may be the result of natural selection – that only the healthiest, most successful older men are able to attract younger mates.

"Another theory is that a younger woman will care for a man better and therefore he will live longer," said institute spokesman Sven Drefahl.

Maybe they just have something to live for.
Title: Re: Hey heteros, what's your "no fats, no fems" equivalent?
Post by: Ed Anger on July 06, 2009, 07:46:04 AM
Quote from: Viking on July 06, 2009, 06:42:33 AM



in other news

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/men_shealth/5426895/Men-live-longer-if-they-marry-a-younger-woman.html

Quote
Men 'live longer' if they marry a younger woman
Men are likely to live longer if they marry a younger woman, new research suggests.


A man's chances of dying early are cut by a fifth if their bride is between 15 and 17 years their junior.

The risk of premature death is reduced by 11 per cent if they marry a woman seven to nine years younger.

The study at Germany's Max Planck Institute also found that men marrying older women are more likely to die early.

The results suggest that women do not experience the same benefits of marrying a toy boy or a sugar daddy.

Wives with husbands older or younger by between seven and nine years increase their chances of dying early by 20 per cent.


This rises to 30 per cent if the age difference is close to 15 and 17 years.

Scientists say the figures for men may be the result of natural selection – that only the healthiest, most successful older men are able to attract younger mates.

"Another theory is that a younger woman will care for a man better and therefore he will live longer," said institute spokesman Sven Drefahl.

The study examined deaths between 1990 and 2005 for the entire population of Denmark.

On average in Europe, most men marry women around three years younger.

I AM IMMORTAL! THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE!