News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

2016 elections - because it's never too early

Started by merithyn, May 09, 2013, 07:37:45 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Barrister

Since apparently I need to burnish my #NeverTrump credentials...

http://www.redstate.com/jaycaruso/2016/09/06/fox-settle-gretchen-carlson-20m-include-apology/

So apparently Roger Ailes behaviour was so boorish, and Gretchen Carlson's proof of such so strong, that Fox News is going to pay her $20 million dollars AND issue a public apology.

Yet there's been nary a peep question why Roger Ailes is going to be a senior advisor for the Trump campaign?  Shouldn't any normal politician want nothing to do with Ailes at this point?
Posts here are my own private opinions.  I do not speak for my employer.

derspiess

http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/06/_politics-zone-injection/trump-vs-clinton-presidential-polls-election-2016/index.html

QuoteTrump tops Clinton 45% to 43% in the new survey, with Libertarian Gary Johnson standing at 7% among likely voters in this poll and the Green Party's Jill Stein at just 2%.
"If you can play a guitar and harmonica at the same time, like Bob Dylan or Neil Young, you're a genius. But make that extra bit of effort and strap some cymbals to your knees, suddenly people want to get the hell away from you."  --Rich Hall

Razgovory

Quote from: Barrister on September 06, 2016, 01:14:04 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on September 06, 2016, 01:08:17 PM
Quote from: Barrister on September 06, 2016, 01:04:04 PM
Quote from: Jacob on September 06, 2016, 12:48:55 PM
Quote from: Barrister on September 06, 2016, 12:34:10 PMShe has a long way to go before beating the greatest crook in modern political history.

:rolleyes:

While yes, once you start moving beyond the US you probably have to go to figures like Berlusconi or Gerhardt Schroder well before you get to Chretien and they're admittedly much bigger crooks.  (assuming you keep it to western democracies, because otherwise things get crazy).

But Chretien was still a master crook.

What crimes did he commit?  When was he charged and convicted.  What was his sentence?

http://www.cbc.ca/news2/background/groupaction/

Will be a start to your fall reading list.  And yes, just for you, there were criminal convictions for fraud (but of course not against JC - thats what fall guys are for).

You have a very different definition of "crook", than I do.  I use that for people who actually commit crimes, ideally with convictions.  I know that in your profession nobody is ever proven innocent, so perhaps that is what is all about.  Presumably you feel the same way about conservative figures as well.
I've given it serious thought. I must scorn the ways of my family, and seek a Japanese woman to yield me my progeny. He shall live in the lands of the east, and be well tutored in his sacred trust to weave the best traditions of Japan and the Sacred South together, until such time as he (or, indeed his house, which will periodically require infusion of both Southern and Japanese bloodlines of note) can deliver to the South it's independence, either in this world or in space.  -Lettow April of 2011

Raz is right. -MadImmortalMan March of 2017

Razgovory

Quote from: CountDeMoney on September 06, 2016, 01:14:20 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on September 06, 2016, 12:51:17 PM
Norway.

Considering how we already possess diplomatic relations--including, among other things, a mutual defense pact--how exactly did Norway have to "pay to play" with the State Department to deal with the US?

They donated money to Clinton Foundation.  Clearly, if they hadn't Clinton would have simply cut off relations with them.
I've given it serious thought. I must scorn the ways of my family, and seek a Japanese woman to yield me my progeny. He shall live in the lands of the east, and be well tutored in his sacred trust to weave the best traditions of Japan and the Sacred South together, until such time as he (or, indeed his house, which will periodically require infusion of both Southern and Japanese bloodlines of note) can deliver to the South it's independence, either in this world or in space.  -Lettow April of 2011

Raz is right. -MadImmortalMan March of 2017

Berkut

Quote from: Barrister on September 06, 2016, 01:39:44 PM
Since apparently I need to burnish my #NeverTrump credentials...

http://www.redstate.com/jaycaruso/2016/09/06/fox-settle-gretchen-carlson-20m-include-apology/

So apparently Roger Ailes behaviour was so boorish, and Gretchen Carlson's proof of such so strong, that Fox News is going to pay her $20 million dollars AND issue a public apology.

Yet there's been nary a peep question why Roger Ailes is going to be a senior advisor for the Trump campaign?  Shouldn't any normal politician want nothing to do with Ailes at this point?

You tell us - your the one carrying the water for Trump. Why doesn't things like this turn you off to him?
"If you think this has a happy ending, then you haven't been paying attention."

select * from users where clue > 0
0 rows returned


CountDeMoney

Quote from: Martinus on September 06, 2016, 02:05:54 PM
Turns out Kasich is a moron after all.

A lot of us closer to Ohio than you have known that for quite a while.  But thanks!

Barrister

Quote from: Razgovory on September 06, 2016, 01:56:30 PM

You have a very different definition of "crook", than I do.  I use that for people who actually commit crimes, ideally with convictions.  I know that in your profession nobody is ever proven innocent, so perhaps that is what is all about.  Presumably you feel the same way about conservative figures as well.

Apparently I do.

QuoteSimple Definition of crook
: a dishonest person
: a criminal
: the place where part of the body (such as an arm, leg, or finger) bends

I'm leaning more on the first definition while you're only looking at the second.
Posts here are my own private opinions.  I do not speak for my employer.

garbon

"I've never been quite sure what the point of a eunuch is, if truth be told. It seems to me they're only men with the useful bits cut off."
I drank because I wanted to drown my sorrows, but now the damned things have learned to swim.

Barrister

Quote from: Berkut on September 06, 2016, 01:58:54 PM
Quote from: Barrister on September 06, 2016, 01:39:44 PM
Since apparently I need to burnish my #NeverTrump credentials...

http://www.redstate.com/jaycaruso/2016/09/06/fox-settle-gretchen-carlson-20m-include-apology/

So apparently Roger Ailes behaviour was so boorish, and Gretchen Carlson's proof of such so strong, that Fox News is going to pay her $20 million dollars AND issue a public apology.

Yet there's been nary a peep question why Roger Ailes is going to be a senior advisor for the Trump campaign?  Shouldn't any normal politician want nothing to do with Ailes at this point?

You tell us - your the one carrying the water for Trump. Why doesn't things like this turn you off to him?

:huh:

It does. #NeverTrump
Posts here are my own private opinions.  I do not speak for my employer.

derspiess

"If you can play a guitar and harmonica at the same time, like Bob Dylan or Neil Young, you're a genius. But make that extra bit of effort and strap some cymbals to your knees, suddenly people want to get the hell away from you."  --Rich Hall

Barrister

Posts here are my own private opinions.  I do not speak for my employer.

alfred russel

Quote from: Barrister on September 06, 2016, 02:11:38 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on September 06, 2016, 01:56:30 PM

You have a very different definition of "crook", than I do.  I use that for people who actually commit crimes, ideally with convictions.  I know that in your profession nobody is ever proven innocent, so perhaps that is what is all about.  Presumably you feel the same way about conservative figures as well.

Apparently I do.

QuoteSimple Definition of crook
: a dishonest person
: a criminal
: the place where part of the body (such as an arm, leg, or finger) bends

I'm leaning more on the first definition while you're only looking at the second.

I'm focused on the third - it can serve as a good tiebreaker. Does JC meet that standard?
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.

There's a fine line between salvation and drinking poison in the jungle.

I'm embarrassed. I've been making the mistake of associating with you. It won't happen again. :)
-garbon, February 23, 2014

Barrister

Quote from: alfred russel on September 06, 2016, 02:36:46 PM
Quote from: Barrister on September 06, 2016, 02:11:38 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on September 06, 2016, 01:56:30 PM

You have a very different definition of "crook", than I do.  I use that for people who actually commit crimes, ideally with convictions.  I know that in your profession nobody is ever proven innocent, so perhaps that is what is all about.  Presumably you feel the same way about conservative figures as well.

Apparently I do.

QuoteSimple Definition of crook
: a dishonest person
: a criminal
: the place where part of the body (such as an arm, leg, or finger) bends

I'm leaning more on the first definition while you're only looking at the second.

I'm focused on the third - it can serve as a good tiebreaker. Does JC meet that standard?

:yes:



You can clearly see the crook between his thumb and forefinger.
Posts here are my own private opinions.  I do not speak for my employer.

Legbiter

Posted using 100% recycled electrons.