2016 elections - because it's never too early

[11B4V]

It's obvious he didn't want to so, SFU already.

[Ed Anger]

It's obvious he didn't want to so, SFU already.

I'll allow the Tim bashing. Objection overruled!

[alfred russel]

It's obvious he didn't want to so, SFU already.

Go fuck yourself B4. Tim has trolled me over the bet proposal, which was dumb considering a) I proposed the bet to highlight he was bringing BS to the forum, and while I was stupid to set terms that may well be met, the prediction Tim brought is turning out to really bad, and b) he never took the bet anyway.

[11B4V]

It's obvious he didn't want to so, SFU already.

Go fuck yourself B4. Tim has trolled me over the bet proposal, which was dumb considering a) I proposed the bet to highlight he was bringing BS to the forum, and while I was stupid to set terms that may well be met, the prediction Tim brought is turning out to really bad, and b) he never took the bet anyway.

Obviously he didn't want to take the bet. What's she up 1.5 mil?

[Phillip V]

It's obvious he didn't want to so, SFU already.

Go fuck yourself B4. Tim has trolled me over the bet proposal, which was dumb considering a) I proposed the bet to highlight he was bringing BS to the forum, and while I was stupid to set terms that may well be met, the prediction Tim brought is turning out to really bad, and b) he never took the bet anyway.

Obviously he didn't want to take the bet. What's she up 1.5 mil?

1.7 million and counting

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_2016

[jimmy olsen]

It's obvious he didn't want to so, SFU already.

Go fuck yourself B4. Tim has trolled me over the bet proposal, which was dumb considering a) I proposed the bet to highlight he was bringing BS to the forum, and while I was stupid to set terms that may well be met, the prediction Tim brought is turning out to really bad, and b) he never took the bet anyway.

Obviously he didn't want to take the bet. What's she up 1.5 mil?

Bingo. I have no interest in making him stop posting for a month.

[garbon]

It's obvious he didn't want to so, SFU already.

Go fuck yourself B4. Tim has trolled me over the bet proposal, which was dumb considering a) I proposed the bet to highlight he was bringing BS to the forum, and while I was stupid to set terms that may well be met, the prediction Tim brought is turning out to really bad, and b) he never took the bet anyway.

Obviously he didn't want to take the bet. What's she up 1.5 mil?

Bingo. I have no interest in making him stop posting for a month.

Fuck you too.

[Eddie Teach]

Maybe he should take time off on his own, to reflect and dwell on that "eat his words" comment. Ouch.

[dps]

What's interesting is that there are projections that Hillary will win California by more than 3 million votes.  Which would mean that even if she ends up with a 2 million vote edge, she will have lost the rest of the country by more than a million votes.

[Martinus]

Maybe he should take time off on his own, to reflect and dwell on that "eat his words" comment. Ouch.

I'd rather have Tim take time off than DGuller.

[garbon]

What's interesting is that there are projections that Hillary will win California by more than 3 million votes.  Which would mean that even if she ends up with a 2 million vote edge, she will have lost the rest of the country by more than a million votes.

Why is that interesting?

[Martinus]

What's interesting is that there are projections that Hillary will win California by more than 3 million votes.  Which would mean that even if she ends up with a 2 million vote edge, she will have lost the rest of the country by more than a million votes.

Why is that interesting?

I guess for the same reason why whoever wins the popular vote is interesting.

[garbon]

What's interesting is that there are projections that Hillary will win California by more than 3 million votes.  Which would mean that even if she ends up with a 2 million vote edge, she will have lost the rest of the country by more than a million votes.

Why is that interesting?

I guess for the same reason why whoever wins the popular vote is interesting.

I obviously can't say no as I don't know why excluding California is interesting (not sure why we'd exclude the most populous state) but gut feel says people are considering those two things interesting for different reasons.

[Eddie Teach]

Because Democrats' self-segregation is causing permanent minority status even when they get a majority of votes. (Also, residents of those enclaves tend to be well out of touch with Middle America.)

[Martinus]

Because Democrats' self-segregation is causing permanent minority status even when they get a majority of votes. (Also, residents of those enclaves tend to be well out of touch with Middle America.)

Well, I suppose preventing such enclaves from controlling the country was one of the goals in mind of those who invented the Electoral College. So I guess the system is working as designed.