Where do you finish?

[Ideologue]

I do 'cause it looks cool, 'cause it's intimate

Ah yeah, nothing beats that intimate, jizzed on the face look...

Sarcastically stated, but essentially correct.

Not in the least. Actually I was thinking about and I think if someone went to do that to me, I'd be tempted to bite it.

Your sexual non-dynamism has been noted.  When the arks are filled, and we need a young gay urban professional who went to an elite school, I'm afraid we're going to have to go with Sheilbh.

[garbon]

Like I'd get on your ghetto ass ark. No beds and the chance that you'll just decide to start punching me? Thanks for not inviting me.

[Ed Anger]

These arks sounds like Lettow's arks filled with Frenchmen served by niggerbots.

[Ideologue]

Like I'd get on your ghetto ass ark. No beds and the chance that you'll just decide to start punching me? Thanks for not inviting me.

You have some pretty strange ideas, my friend.

Anyway, more seriously, what is the objection?  I wish to understand the arguments.

I've heard "being gross" cited by women, but that's really kind of retarded given the same women will take semen internally, which is more difficult to control and thus potentially messier (I mean viz. sheets and carpets, but, yes, also pregnancy).  This line of reasoning only seems valid when it comes to the prospect of semen getting in the hair, which is a totally manageable risk with two experienced partners (and mega-hot too, but that's another story).

Is it indeed because it seems--as appears to be the majority opinion amongst folks here--overtly submissive and therefore hits that kind of hard limit for some people?

[Ideologue]

These arks sounds like Lettow's arks filled with Frenchmen served by niggerbots.

They're just regular end of the world arks.

[CountDeMoney]

These arks sounds like Lettow's arks filled with Frenchmen served by niggerbots.

They're just regular end of the world arks.

With no beds in the fucking bedrooms.

[11B4V]

I do 'cause it looks cool, 'cause it's intimate

Ah yeah, nothing beats that intimate, jizzed on the face look...

Bukkake

[Ed Anger]

These arks sounds like Lettow's arks filled with Frenchmen served by niggerbots.

They're just regular end of the world arks.

With no beds in the fucking bedrooms.

The interstellar Big Lots furniture was closed.

[garbon]

I do 'cause it looks cool, 'cause it's intimate

Ah yeah, nothing beats that intimate, jizzed on the face look...

Bukkake

I generally don't live my life like a porn shoot.

[garbon]

Anyway, more seriously, what is the objection?  I wish to understand the arguments.

I've heard "being gross" cited by women, but that's really kind of retarded given the same women will take semen internally, which is more difficult to control and thus potentially messier (I mean viz. sheets and carpets, but, yes, also pregnancy).  This line of reasoning only seems valid when it comes to the prospect of semen getting in the hair, which is a totally manageable risk with two experienced partners (and mega-hot too, but that's another story).

Is it indeed because it seems--as appears to be the majority opinion amongst folks here--overtly submissive and therefore hits that kind of hard limit for some people?

Nothing gross about but why the fuck would I want that. I can't think of anything enjoyable about having someone's cum on my face that I'll then have to clean off. Messy enough in other places that stuff is. Also, I don't see how it is intimate at all.

[11B4V]

 

[Malthus]

Wrong. Facials are not DS.

Your unwillingness to admit it is the funny part. 

Wrong.  There is nothing funny.  This is a serious matter.

I was at work, so couldn't go into it, but yes, for some, it's a DS thing.  DS has its place, but is also bound by rules and honesty; men who are using it to stealth dom are basically bitter people who hate women (e.g., CdM, HVC, fahdiz).  Mens is important.

I do 'cause it looks cool, 'cause it's intimate, and 'cause it can't cause pregnancy.  If you're doing it because you think you've marked out some kind of territory, so when you see her years later and your seed has been washed away, died, and decayed, and so has every cell in her face, you can still make-pretend and call a woman yours, you're doing it wrong.  Follow that logic all the way, and madness lies; soon you'll be deliberately giving women foolish enough to open themselves to your predations herpes.  But at least then her next beau might care.

It's really sad.  Nevertheless, I've been immensely cheered up, because by mere dint of possessing a healthy sexuality uncorrupted by hate, I can look down on others with pity.  And that's all I ever wanted for Christmas.

CdM has his own ... issues. 

But fact is, you may not think it has anything to do with DS, maybe for you it has some other, subjective meaning, but I'm inclined to doubt; if you looked behind "it's intimate" and "it looks cool", I'd bet you'd find "it's a turn-on"; and why is it a turn-on? Because someone is willingly allowing it to be done to them.

No doubt there are Germans out there who say pissing in the face of their partners is all about the aesthetics of splash and flow, but we don't have to believe that's the whole of the matter.