Elementary school shooting reported in Newtown, Conn.

[derspiess]

I'm not going to defend Huck, but the article twists his words into something he didn't actually say.

[crazy canuck]

I'm not going to defend Huck, but the article twists his words into something he didn't actually say.

Ok, you have started defending him so go all the way.  What do you think he said?

[Admiral Yi]

I think he was talking about non-two parent families.

[garbon]

I'm not going to defend Huck, but the article twists his words into something he didn't actually say.

Ok, you have started defending him so go all the way.  What do you think he said?

Yeah I won't defend him except for the part where I will...

[Admiral Yi]

Yeah I won't defend him except for the part where I will...

I don't get this attitude that pointing out a misunderstanding or mischaracterization is somehow taking sides.

If someone were to claim that Huckabee says he's in favor of gassing all homos, and I point out he did in fact not say that, am I "defending Huckabee?"

[garbon]

Huckabee is reprehensible enough that I don't see the distinction mattering in this case.

[Valmy]

I think he was talking about non-two parent families.

Sounds pretty stupid to say society holds two parent families in contempt though.

"We diminish and even hold in contempt the natural family of a father and mother creating and then responsibly raising the next generation and then express dismay that kids feel no real connection to their families or even the concept of a family."

I am sure somebody does this.  Radical crazy lefties of certain flavors do, but 'we' do this as a society?

[Admiral Yi]

Huckabee is reprehensible enough that I don't see the distinction mattering in this case.

Very Huffington Post/Michael Moorish of you.

[Valmy]

Huckabee is reprehensible enough that I don't see the distinction mattering in this case.

Very Huffington Post/Michael Moorish of you.

If having an issue with Huck's statement is something only Huff Post or Michael Moore would do they are clearly more reasonable than I thought.

[Admiral Yi]

If having an issue with Huck's statement is something only Huff Post or Michael Moore would do they are clearly more reasonable than I thought.

Your premise is flawed.

[Neil]

I'm not going to defend Huck, but the article twists his words into something he didn't actually say.

I wouldn't sweat it too much.  Huck shot his mouth off a bit, true, but the article is from a gay blog, and thus not reputable.  It might as well have been written in one of Ron Paul's goldbug newsletters.

[derspiess]

I'm not going to defend Huck, but the article twists his words into something he didn't actually say.

Ok, you have started defending him so go all the way.  What do you think he said?

I think he's just saying the absence of religious morality leaves a vacuum in which massacres like this are more likely to happen.  I don't happen to agree with that (as much as I'm sure you'd love me to) but I don't think that is the same as blaming gay people for Sandy Hook.  The author of Marti's mystery article apparently thinks everything's always about him and should probably get over himself.

[Ed Anger]

I blame Perez Hilton.

[crazy canuck]

I blame Perez Hilton.

Is she Juwish?

[Grey Fox]

I blame Perez Hilton.

Is she Juwish?

he.