The Great Debate Megathread! Black Lincoln versus whiter, richer Douglas!

Started by Sheilbh, October 02, 2012, 10:02:37 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Admiral Yi

Quote from: Peter Wiggin on October 03, 2012, 05:59:44 PM
A cap on deductions affects those who have been able to deduct high amounts more than people who haven't. :smarty:

Exactly.   Generally people who have large mortgage interest payments, big medical bills, and give a lot to charity.

DGuller

I'm strangely unexcited about tonight's debate.  These debates are like NASCAR races:  they're largely very tedious affairs that are made exciting only by the possibility of a spectacular crash.  I don't think Romney is going to shit himself on live TV, and I won't be too excited in seeing Obama do it if that happens.

Jacob

Yeah, the fun part about the debate is finding live bloggers and message boards watching them and follow the reactions to whatever is going on.

Eddie Teach

Quote from: DGuller on October 03, 2012, 06:05:50 PM
I'm strangely unexcited about tonight's debate.

That's completely normal. The strange thing is that you think you should be excited.  :hmm:
To sleep, perchance to dream. But in that sleep of death, what dreams may come?

FunkMonk

Quote from: Peter Wiggin on October 03, 2012, 04:35:22 PM
Quote from: FunkMonk on October 03, 2012, 04:03:56 PM
Quote from: Sheilbh on October 03, 2012, 03:56:57 PM
Based on Maggie, Golda and Indira I kind of admire and fear successful female politicians.

What about Sarah? (Palin)

He didn't say anything about successful reality tv stars.

She was a state governor and vice presidential candidate on a major party ticket. That qualifies as successful politician to me.
Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

CountDeMoney

Quote from: crazy canuck on October 03, 2012, 05:30:07 PM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on October 03, 2012, 05:27:55 PM
Just heard on CNN that Romney has proposed a $17K cap on deductions.


Works great for Mittens.  Only penalizes those poor smucks who make their money earning wages.  Doesnt touch those who can get paid through dividends, share options etc.

Mittens makes so much money, I don't think he can even conceive the value of $17,000.  It needs two more zeros for him to even comprehend the concept.

FunkMonk

Quote from: CountDeMoney on October 03, 2012, 06:24:37 PM
Quote from: crazy canuck on October 03, 2012, 05:30:07 PM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on October 03, 2012, 05:27:55 PM
Just heard on CNN that Romney has proposed a $17K cap on deductions.


Works great for Mittens.  Only penalizes those poor smucks who make their money earning wages.  Doesnt touch those who can get paid through dividends, share options etc.

Mittens makes so much money, I don't think he can even conceive the value of $17,000.  It needs two more zeros for him to even comprehend the concept.

To be fair, it seems his minimum bets are about $10,000 so I'm sure $17,000 registers somewhere in the Romnocracy.
Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

CountDeMoney

Quote from: FunkMonk on October 03, 2012, 06:31:17 PM
To be fair, it seems his minimum bets are about $10,000 so I'm sure $17,000 registers somewhere in the Romnocracy.

$10K is country club couch change to sink the putt on the 4th green, so perhaps it does.

CountDeMoney

Quote from: FunkMonk on October 03, 2012, 06:10:07 PM
She was a state governor that never completed her first and only term and vice presidential candidate on a major party ticket that lost. That qualifies as an unsuccessful politician to me.

FYP.

Admiral Yi

Quote from: FunkMonk on October 03, 2012, 06:31:17 PM
To be fair, it seems his minimum bets are about $10,000 so I'm sure $17,000 registers somewhere in the Romnocracy.

:mellow: You guys seem to be a little lost on the concept of capping deductions.

CountDeMoney

Quote from: Admiral Yi on October 03, 2012, 06:44:06 PM
Quote from: FunkMonk on October 03, 2012, 06:31:17 PM
To be fair, it seems his minimum bets are about $10,000 so I'm sure $17,000 registers somewhere in the Romnocracy.

:mellow: You guys seem to be a little lost on the concept of capping deductions.

I'm all for caps for rich people, but $17,000 sounds arbitrary.  How was it arrived at?  A percentage of projection?  An average?  To what income ceiling?  Single or married?  Up to $250K income earners? What, then?

DGuller

I think capping deductions is a band-aid solution that misses the problem, like almost all caps do.  If you have to use capping, then you probably fucked up somewhere in one of the previous steps. 

If people are taking too many deductions, then maybe deductions should be looked at rather than just saying "all right, we'll let you bullshit, but only by so much".  Invariably you'll run into cases where huge deduction are completely warranted (if, for example, you're an amateur gambler who wins and loses thousands each night), but the cap is going to lead to >100% tax on profits.

derspiess

Quote from: CountDeMoney on October 03, 2012, 06:47:07 PM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on October 03, 2012, 06:44:06 PM
Quote from: FunkMonk on October 03, 2012, 06:31:17 PM
To be fair, it seems his minimum bets are about $10,000 so I'm sure $17,000 registers somewhere in the Romnocracy.

:mellow: You guys seem to be a little lost on the concept of capping deductions.

I'm all for caps for rich people, but $17,000 sounds arbitrary.  How was it arrived at?  A percentage of projection?  An average?  To what income ceiling?  Single or married?  Up to $250K income earners? What, then?

Tune in and see!
"If you can play a guitar and harmonica at the same time, like Bob Dylan or Neil Young, you're a genius. But make that extra bit of effort and strap some cymbals to your knees, suddenly people want to get the hell away from you."  --Rich Hall

CountDeMoney

Quote from: derspiess on October 03, 2012, 06:55:38 PM
Tune in and see!

QuoteBen Ginsberg, Romney's campaign legal counsel, said at a Politico Live 2012 debate event in Denver that Romney will provide more details "in the next five weeks."

:lol: Of course.

DGuller

One other thing:  the concept of simplifying the tax code, and the concept of putting in more caps in the tax code, are kind of contradictory.  Caps create all sorts of discontinuities, and discontinuities are exactly the things that makes things very not simple to analyze.

EDIT:  Or lack-of-smoothness, I forgot which math term applies here.