The DNC KenyanCommieMooselimbDidn'tBuildIt MegaThread!

Started by CountDeMoney, September 03, 2012, 10:11:04 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Viking

First Maxim - "There are only two amounts, too few and enough."
First Corollary - "You cannot have too many soldiers, only too few supplies."
Second Maxim - "Be willing to exchange a bad idea for a good one."
Second Corollary - "You can only be wrong or agree with me."

A terrorist which starts a slaughter quoting Locke, Burke and Mill has completely missed the point.
The fact remains that the only person or group to applaud the Norway massacre are random Islamists.

Viking

Quote from: mongers on September 12, 2012, 06:39:58 PM
Quote from: Viking on September 12, 2012, 06:16:52 PM
Quote from: DGuller on September 12, 2012, 05:38:09 PM
The ship thing is an easy mistake to make.  How many of you would actually be able to spot that mistake on your own?  It's not like with tanks, where most lay people would know that a T-72 tank is not Abrams, even if they wouldn't understand why T-72 is superior.

I'm a bit curious, how, in any metric is the T-72 superior to any version of the Abrams?
See my above post.

I'm confused. I know the ships were russian and not american. I just want to hear from the Uke how the T-72 is superior in any way to any version of the Abrams as he claims.
First Maxim - "There are only two amounts, too few and enough."
First Corollary - "You cannot have too many soldiers, only too few supplies."
Second Maxim - "Be willing to exchange a bad idea for a good one."
Second Corollary - "You can only be wrong or agree with me."

A terrorist which starts a slaughter quoting Locke, Burke and Mill has completely missed the point.
The fact remains that the only person or group to applaud the Norway massacre are random Islamists.

Grey Fox

Quote from: Viking on September 13, 2012, 07:30:55 AM
Quote from: mongers on September 12, 2012, 06:39:58 PM
Quote from: Viking on September 12, 2012, 06:16:52 PM
Quote from: DGuller on September 12, 2012, 05:38:09 PM
The ship thing is an easy mistake to make.  How many of you would actually be able to spot that mistake on your own?  It's not like with tanks, where most lay people would know that a T-72 tank is not Abrams, even if they wouldn't understand why T-72 is superior.

I'm a bit curious, how, in any metric is the T-72 superior to any version of the Abrams?
See my above post.

I'm confused. I know the ships were russian and not american. I just want to hear from the Uke how the T-72 is superior in any way to any version of the Abrams as he claims.

It's not, it's a joke, On SirHockey, from 2003.
Colonel Caliga is Awesome.

Viking

Quote from: CountDeMoney on September 12, 2012, 07:12:41 PM
Quote from: DGuller on September 12, 2012, 05:38:09 PM
It's not like with tanks, where most lay people would know that a T-72 tank is not Abrams, even if they wouldn't understand why T-72 is superior.

:lol:  EUOT 2003 SHOUTOUT

ah, oh... meh... I thought the claim was that the T-80 and T-90 were better than the Abrams?
First Maxim - "There are only two amounts, too few and enough."
First Corollary - "You cannot have too many soldiers, only too few supplies."
Second Maxim - "Be willing to exchange a bad idea for a good one."
Second Corollary - "You can only be wrong or agree with me."

A terrorist which starts a slaughter quoting Locke, Burke and Mill has completely missed the point.
The fact remains that the only person or group to applaud the Norway massacre are random Islamists.

Razgovory

Most old Soviet tanks have a hitch on the front so they can be towed into battle by teams of oxen.  Western Tanks lack this capability.
I've given it serious thought. I must scorn the ways of my family, and seek a Japanese woman to yield me my progeny. He shall live in the lands of the east, and be well tutored in his sacred trust to weave the best traditions of Japan and the Sacred South together, until such time as he (or, indeed his house, which will periodically require infusion of both Southern and Japanese bloodlines of note) can deliver to the South it's independence, either in this world or in space.  -Lettow April of 2011

Raz is right. -MadImmortalMan March of 2017

Capetan Mihali

Quote from: garbon on September 13, 2012, 07:14:46 AM
Quote from: Capetan Mihali on September 12, 2012, 11:08:04 PM
Quote from: garbon on September 09, 2012, 08:33:12 PM
Much in the same way that if I buy liquor at 6th and 8th, I'll pay a significant premium over a purchase of the same liquor at 6th and 23rd (and more dramatically over said purchase in BedStuy) in one part because people in the village can afford to pay more.

:secret:  (You say the street first, avenue second.)

Pretty sure I say whatever I please. :P

Well, you can pronounce Houston Street like the city in Texas if you want, too, doesn't mean it's right.   :P
"The internet's completely over. [...] The internet's like MTV. At one time MTV was hip and suddenly it became outdated. Anyway, all these computers and digital gadgets are no good. They just fill your head with numbers and that can't be good for you."
-- Prince, 2010. (R.I.P.)

Ed Anger

Quote from: Razgovory on September 13, 2012, 07:46:06 AM
Most old Soviet tanks have a hitch on the front so they can be towed into battle by teams of oxen.  Western Tanks lack this capability.

:lol:
Stay Alive...Let the Man Drive

CountDeMoney

Quote from: Viking on September 13, 2012, 07:33:15 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on September 12, 2012, 07:12:41 PM
:lol:  EUOT 2003 SHOUTOUT

ah, oh... meh... I thought the claim was that the T-80 and T-90 were better than the Abrams?

IIRC, it was the reactive armor of the T-62 that was superior to Abrhams chobham plating.

Viking

Quote from: CountDeMoney on September 13, 2012, 08:18:56 AM
Quote from: Viking on September 13, 2012, 07:33:15 AM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on September 12, 2012, 07:12:41 PM
:lol:  EUOT 2003 SHOUTOUT

ah, oh... meh... I thought the claim was that the T-80 and T-90 were better than the Abrams?

IIRC, it was the reactive armor of the T-62 that was superior to Abrhams chobham plating.

That was the dprk claim that Juche powered tanks from WWII could turn ROK K1 tanks into mincemeat.

BTW, that K2 seems to be a monster.. it's fascinating what you can do when you have a large economy and no need to airlift tanks.
First Maxim - "There are only two amounts, too few and enough."
First Corollary - "You cannot have too many soldiers, only too few supplies."
Second Maxim - "Be willing to exchange a bad idea for a good one."
Second Corollary - "You can only be wrong or agree with me."

A terrorist which starts a slaughter quoting Locke, Burke and Mill has completely missed the point.
The fact remains that the only person or group to applaud the Norway massacre are random Islamists.

garbon

Quote from: Capetan Mihali on September 13, 2012, 07:48:13 AM
Quote from: garbon on September 13, 2012, 07:14:46 AM
Quote from: Capetan Mihali on September 12, 2012, 11:08:04 PM
Quote from: garbon on September 09, 2012, 08:33:12 PM
Much in the same way that if I buy liquor at 6th and 8th, I'll pay a significant premium over a purchase of the same liquor at 6th and 23rd (and more dramatically over said purchase in BedStuy) in one part because people in the village can afford to pay more.

:secret:  (You say the street first, avenue second.)

Pretty sure I say whatever I please. :P

Well, you can pronounce Houston Street like the city in Texas if you want, too, doesn't mean it's right.   :P

Actually I can't a woman asked me how to get to Houston (with Tex pronunciation) and all I could think was I guess you should go to JFK. :blush:

Anyway, like I pointed out after that post - consistency seems to have died if those 3 institutions that I pointed out now are haphazard about what they say. :P
"I've never been quite sure what the point of a eunuch is, if truth be told. It seems to me they're only men with the useful bits cut off."
I drank because I wanted to drown my sorrows, but now the damned things have learned to swim.

Jacob

Quote from: Viking on September 13, 2012, 07:30:55 AM
I'm confused. I know the ships were russian and not american. I just want to hear from the Uke how the T-72 is superior in any way to any version of the Abrams as he claims.

:lol: again.

@ you.