Canada to firmly re-assess its status as a British colony

Started by viper37, August 15, 2011, 08:08:42 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Viking

Quote from: Ideologue on August 17, 2011, 09:23:08 AM
I'd thought it had something to do with how fire is apparently somewhat related to arson, so weapons which deliberate cause fires = "arsonal." -_-

http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=arsenal

from dar as-sina'ah or house of manufacture

arson has a latin root

http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=arson

First Maxim - "There are only two amounts, too few and enough."
First Corollary - "You cannot have too many soldiers, only too few supplies."
Second Maxim - "Be willing to exchange a bad idea for a good one."
Second Corollary - "You can only be wrong or agree with me."

A terrorist which starts a slaughter quoting Locke, Burke and Mill has completely missed the point.
The fact remains that the only person or group to applaud the Norway massacre are random Islamists.

Razgovory

Quote from: Viking on August 17, 2011, 09:26:42 AM
Quote from: Ideologue on August 17, 2011, 09:23:08 AM
I'd thought it had something to do with how fire is apparently somewhat related to arson, so weapons which deliberate cause fires = "arsonal." -_-

http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=arsenal

from dar as-sina'ah or house of manufacture

arson has a latin root

http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=arson

Huh, I always figured it was from "ars" an Indo-European root for fitting to together.  We get the words Art, artisan, and arms from that.  Possibly the gods Ares and Mars and the national names Iran and Aryan.

I R: Surprised.
I've given it serious thought. I must scorn the ways of my family, and seek a Japanese woman to yield me my progeny. He shall live in the lands of the east, and be well tutored in his sacred trust to weave the best traditions of Japan and the Sacred South together, until such time as he (or, indeed his house, which will periodically require infusion of both Southern and Japanese bloodlines of note) can deliver to the South it's independence, either in this world or in space.  -Lettow April of 2011

Raz is right. -MadImmortalMan March of 2017

viper37

Quote from: Viking on August 17, 2011, 09:02:19 AM
Canada is no longer a colony, but she is, however, still a Monarchy.
with a foreign Monarch, from wich we should seek to distance ourself.  You can't be truly independant if your head of state is foreign.  I now understand better why English Canadians see Quebec's independance with such a bad idea.  They themselves can't get over the fact that Canada is a seperate nation from England and need to re-assess their attachment to the crown at every opportunity.  For fuck sake, what's next?  The Royal Post Corporation?  The Royal Canadian National Bank?

If the Canadian army corps can't existe without reminding everyone that they are really the Queen's army, might as well not have a distinct army and merge it back with the British Empire.  They have that military tradition wich seem so important (curious that no soldier ever talked about it when you asked them what kind of problems they face or what they need to be done differently).

I'm pretty sure all those veterans without pension or without decent care will feel better now that they are part of the Royal army :)
I mean, how can it not solve all the problems the Canadian Armed Forces faces?  They will have tradition now :)  They will be anchored to the past and everyone will be constantly reminded we are still a British Colony, a part of their mighty Empire, governed by a foreign ruler.

I believe a country should look to the future, not constantly look at the past.  I tought the Conservatives clearly understood that, but it seems they really don't grasp something that simple.
I don't do meditation.  I drink alcohol to relax, like normal people.

If Microsoft Excel decided to stop working overnight, the world would practically end.

Malthus

Quote from: viper37 on August 17, 2011, 12:30:28 PM
Quote from: Viking on August 17, 2011, 09:02:19 AM
Canada is no longer a colony, but she is, however, still a Monarchy.
with a foreign Monarch, from wich we should seek to distance ourself.  You can't be truly independant if your head of state is foreign.  I now understand better why English Canadians see Quebec's independance with such a bad idea.  They themselves can't get over the fact that Canada is a seperate nation from England and need to re-assess their attachment to the crown at every opportunity.  For fuck sake, what's next?  The Royal Post Corporation?  The Royal Canadian National Bank?

If the Canadian army corps can't existe without reminding everyone that they are really the Queen's army, might as well not have a distinct army and merge it back with the British Empire.  They have that military tradition wich seem so important (curious that no soldier ever talked about it when you asked them what kind of problems they face or what they need to be done differently).

I'm pretty sure all those veterans without pension or without decent care will feel better now that they are part of the Royal army :)
I mean, how can it not solve all the problems the Canadian Armed Forces faces?  They will have tradition now :)  They will be anchored to the past and everyone will be constantly reminded we are still a British Colony, a part of their mighty Empire, governed by a foreign ruler.

I believe a country should look to the future, not constantly look at the past.  I tought the Conservatives clearly understood that, but it seems they really don't grasp something that simple.

The vast majority of English Canadians could not give a toss either way. Though this one finds the over-the-top hysteria on the issue amusing.  :D
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane—Marcus Aurelius

Viking

Quote from: viper37 on August 17, 2011, 12:30:28 PM
Quote from: Viking on August 17, 2011, 09:02:19 AM
Canada is no longer a colony, but she is, however, still a Monarchy.
with a foreign Monarch, from wich we should seek to distance ourself.  You can't be truly independant if your head of state is foreign.  I now understand better why English Canadians see Quebec's independance with such a bad idea.  They themselves can't get over the fact that Canada is a seperate nation from England and need to re-assess their attachment to the crown at every opportunity.  For fuck sake, what's next?  The Royal Post Corporation?  The Royal Canadian National Bank?

If the Canadian army corps can't existe without reminding everyone that they are really the Queen's army, might as well not have a distinct army and merge it back with the British Empire.  They have that military tradition wich seem so important (curious that no soldier ever talked about it when you asked them what kind of problems they face or what they need to be done differently).

I'm pretty sure all those veterans without pension or without decent care will feel better now that they are part of the Royal army :)
I mean, how can it not solve all the problems the Canadian Armed Forces faces?  They will have tradition now :)  They will be anchored to the past and everyone will be constantly reminded we are still a British Colony, a part of their mighty Empire, governed by a foreign ruler.

I believe a country should look to the future, not constantly look at the past.  I tought the Conservatives clearly understood that, but it seems they really don't grasp something that simple.

To misquote Hume, you can't get an "is" from a "should". Canada is a Monarchy and it is consistent with all other monarchies to give the armed forces fancy royal names. If you are against the monarchy you should oppose the monarchy. I can't, however, consider it disingenuous to argue against making the monarchy as good and effective as possible given that you have one. I think you should agree with me, as a fellow republican living in a monarchy, that a well run monarchy that uses it's advantages is better than a badly run monarchy that pretends it's not there. As a democrat you should accept the fact, and it is a fact, that the monarchy retains democratic legitimacy as the system of government in Canada.

I am a republican. I do however see that there are some advantages to Monarchy, though, obviously on the whole I think the benefits of a good Republic far outweigh the benefits of a good Monarchy. These advantages include the humbling of professional politicians and the ability to take advantage of traditions in military and administration (where the politicians choose not to "reform" them). I think that putting "Royal" in front of the names of the military branches not only remind the soldiers but also the politicians that the military is not a plaything of government, but rather an institution of the "crown" (that is to say the country).
First Maxim - "There are only two amounts, too few and enough."
First Corollary - "You cannot have too many soldiers, only too few supplies."
Second Maxim - "Be willing to exchange a bad idea for a good one."
Second Corollary - "You can only be wrong or agree with me."

A terrorist which starts a slaughter quoting Locke, Burke and Mill has completely missed the point.
The fact remains that the only person or group to applaud the Norway massacre are random Islamists.

Barrister

Quote from: viper37 on August 17, 2011, 12:30:28 PM
You can't be truly independant if your head of state is foreign.

Why not?

Seems to me we have the best of both worlds - we have the tradition and stability that the monarchy brings, without having to actually pay for it. :)
Posts here are my own private opinions.  I do not speak for my employer.

HVC

Being lazy is bad; unless you still get what you want, then it's called "patience".
Hubris must be punished. Severely.

Barrister

Posts here are my own private opinions.  I do not speak for my employer.

HVC

Being lazy is bad; unless you still get what you want, then it's called "patience".
Hubris must be punished. Severely.

Valmy

Quote"This is a Russian warship. I propose you lay down arms and surrender to avoid bloodshed & unnecessary victims. Otherwise, you'll be bombed."

Zmiinyi defenders: "Russian warship, go fuck yourself."

HVC

Being lazy is bad; unless you still get what you want, then it's called "patience".
Hubris must be punished. Severely.

Viking

Quote from: Valmy on August 17, 2011, 01:36:23 PM
Quote from: HVC on August 17, 2011, 01:30:50 PM
Queens german anyway.

She is as British as Queen Victoria!

Given that the Queen Mum is Scottish, I'm pretty sure that QE2 is much more British (but no more English) than Vicky.
First Maxim - "There are only two amounts, too few and enough."
First Corollary - "You cannot have too many soldiers, only too few supplies."
Second Maxim - "Be willing to exchange a bad idea for a good one."
Second Corollary - "You can only be wrong or agree with me."

A terrorist which starts a slaughter quoting Locke, Burke and Mill has completely missed the point.
The fact remains that the only person or group to applaud the Norway massacre are random Islamists.

Palisadoes

Quote from: HVC on August 17, 2011, 01:36:03 PM
Quote from: Barrister on August 17, 2011, 01:35:05 PM
Worse yet - she's married to a Greek. :o


i try to forget that cause he's cool. damn you!

He's not *really* that Greek at all. Yes, he was born in Greece, but his formative years were not spent there.

HVC

Man when all these people find out their monarches are foreigners they're going to be pissed.
Being lazy is bad; unless you still get what you want, then it's called "patience".
Hubris must be punished. Severely.

Barrister

Quote from: Palisadoes on August 17, 2011, 01:40:54 PM
Quote from: HVC on August 17, 2011, 01:36:03 PM
Quote from: Barrister on August 17, 2011, 01:35:05 PM
Worse yet - she's married to a Greek. :o


i try to forget that cause he's cool. damn you!

He's not *really* that Greek at all. Yes, he was born in Greece, but his formative years were not spent there.

Killjoy. :rolleyes:

He's more Greek than Liz is German.
Posts here are my own private opinions.  I do not speak for my employer.