TV/Movies Megathread

[Ideologue]

I really liked Lost in Translation. Only seen it once though, maybe I'd feel differently after a second viewing.

I find watching it hard though because Scarlett makes me weep for what I cannot have.

Word. Any film that begins with a long take on Miss Johansson's bum in panties deserves praise.

This.

You know they make pornography for what's ailing you, right?

You can see Scarlett Johansson's bum in luscious pink  panties in a porno? Which one?

There are plenty of asses in pornography that meet or exceed Johanssen spec.

[Tonitrus]

I really liked Lost in Translation. Only seen it once though, maybe I'd feel differently after a second viewing.

I find watching it hard though because Scarlett makes me weep for what I cannot have.

Word. Any film that begins with a long take on Miss Johansson's bum in panties deserves praise.

This.

You know they make pornography for what's ailing you, right?

You can see Scarlett Johansson's bum in luscious pink  panties in a porno? Which one?

There are plenty of asses in pornography that meet or exceed Johanssen spec.

Yeah, but those all have some other dude's cock stuck in them.

[Admiral Yi]

Just saw Too Big to Fail.

Good cast, excellent production values.  Not at all flattering to McCain.

[CountDeMoney]

Just saw Too Big to Fail.

Good cast, excellent production values.  Not at all flattering to McCain.

Yeah, I really liked that.  Giamatti made a more interesting Bernanke than Bernanke.

[Ideologue]

I really liked Lost in Translation. Only seen it once though, maybe I'd feel differently after a second viewing.

I find watching it hard though because Scarlett makes me weep for what I cannot have.

Word. Any film that begins with a long take on Miss Johansson's bum in panties deserves praise.

This.

You know they make pornography for what's ailing you, right?

You can see Scarlett Johansson's bum in luscious pink  panties in a porno? Which one?

There are plenty of asses in pornography that meet or exceed Johanssen spec.

Yeah, but those all have some other dude's cock stuck in them.

Traditionally, audiences have demanded an identifiable protagonist.

[Eddie Teach]

I prefer a girl by herself and looking at the camera. 

[The Brain]

I prefer a girl by herself and looking at the camera. 

Sunny D and rum... yum yum??

[Duque de Bragança]

Saw most of Dinner for Chumps.  Bleh.  No pace, lines not that funny.  Love interest is very easy on the eyes though.

That's a remake, right? Serves you well.

[viper37]

yes. it's a bad remake of Le Diner de Con.

Yi, have you seen the French original?  That was funny

[viper37]

Priest.

Not a bad movie but far from great either.
I can't say I got bored, but I never felt any kind of suspense either, or any emotional attachment to any of the characters.

Characters are blend.  The story is trying to be some Judge Dredd with Vampires, but it fails, miserably.

I don't recommend viewing this unless you're an avid fan of pre-Twilight vampires.

[Admiral Yi]

yes. it's a bad remake of Le Diner de Con.

Yi, have you seen the French original?  That was funny

I'll keep a look out for it on cable.

[viper37]

yes. it's a bad remake of Le Diner de Con.

Yi, have you seen the French original?  That was funny

I'll keep a look out for it on cable.

It's from 1998.  Better look for it on the web
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119038/

[Admiral Yi]

It's from 1998.  Better look for it on the web
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119038/

Dail up. 

IFC and Sundance show old ferenghi flics once in a while.

[Neil]

Just saw Too Big to Fail.

Good cast, excellent production values.  Not at all flattering to McCain.

Yeah, I really liked that.  Giamatti made a more interesting Bernanke than Bernanke.

Yeah.  And they made excellent use of James Woods.

[Admiral Yi]

Monk and the dothead supermarket guy kind of threw me.