News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

TV/Movies Megathread

Started by Eddie Teach, March 06, 2011, 09:29:27 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

HVC

i share sheilbh's memory, that he just sound scottish... but angrier. much like his highlander role where he's a Spaniard with a Scottish accent, but a carefree Scott.
Being lazy is bad; unless you still get what you want, then it's called "patience".
Hubris must be punished. Severely.

Barrister

Quote from: HVC on September 27, 2021, 12:03:03 PM
i share sheilbh's memory, that he just sound scottish... but angrier. much like his highlander role where he's a Spaniard with a Scottish accent, but a carefree Scott.

I was just watching a couple of clips.  I definitely agree he mostly sounds scottish, but it does sound like he's trying to do something with his accent.
Posts here are my own private opinions.  I do not speak for my employer.

The Brain

Connery's character is Lithuanian. Luckily they sound Scottish.
Women want me. Men want to be with me.

Syt

Connery faked a Scottish accent in The Longest Day, IIRC.

:P
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein's brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops.
—Stephen Jay Gould

Proud owner of 42 Zoupa Points.

crazy canuck

Quote from: HVC on September 27, 2021, 10:24:14 AM
Quote from: Eddie Teach on September 26, 2021, 09:55:14 PM
Squid Game. Pretty messed up.

i watched it too. can't decide if i like it. [spoiler] i did guess right that the old man was involved some how, he just seemed too out of place [/spoiler]

I really liked the blunt social commentary and character development. [spoiler]but I think it would have been better to end it with the one season.   Not sure where they go from here.  I thought it would have been better if the brother had been the host - he was after all a multimillionaire and no longer had to work.  Why he bothered running the thing was never explained.[/spoiler]

Duque de Bragança

#49400
Quote from: Tyr on September 27, 2021, 11:02:54 AM
Quote from: Duque de Bragança on September 27, 2021, 10:22:13 AM
Quote from: Tyr on September 27, 2021, 07:18:40 AM

Its funny that this in this alternative near-future most people seem to speak French.

Tyr's bigotry is hilarious.  :lol:

:unsure:
You think it realistic a European space mission would be French speaking and that an American mission would conveniently have 3 French speakers?

In a French series, yes. Not so many Anglo actors available. Plus, a European space mission can't rely only on the residual Anglophones (Irish). It's post-Brexit, remember.  :P

Duque de Bragança

Quote from: Sheilbh on September 27, 2021, 11:46:41 AM
Quote from: Barrister on September 27, 2021, 11:44:40 AM
Been a long time but I thought Red October's use of Russian subjected the audience to Connery's really bad fake Russian accent.  I don't otherwise recall how they "handled" the language question.

Although Harrison Ford's Russian accent in K-19 was even worse!
They start in Russian and then casually segue into English - so we were exposed to Connery's really bad fake Russian. Tragically Russians were exposed to Connery's, what I can only imagine was even worse, actual Russian :lol:

Segue into English was better handled IMO in a movie by the same director, the 13th Warrior.

crazy canuck

Quote from: Duque de Bragança on September 27, 2021, 01:12:26 PM
Quote from: Sheilbh on September 27, 2021, 11:46:41 AM
Quote from: Barrister on September 27, 2021, 11:44:40 AM
Been a long time but I thought Red October's use of Russian subjected the audience to Connery's really bad fake Russian accent.  I don't otherwise recall how they "handled" the language question.

Although Harrison Ford's Russian accent in K-19 was even worse!
They start in Russian and then casually segue into English - so we were exposed to Connery's really bad fake Russian. Tragically Russians were exposed to Connery's, what I can only imagine was even worse, actual Russian :lol:

Segue into English was better handled IMO in a movie by the same director, the 13th Warrior.

A great scene in a not great movie.

Duque de Bragança

Quote from: crazy canuck on September 27, 2021, 02:54:03 PM
Quote from: Duque de Bragança on September 27, 2021, 01:12:26 PM
Quote from: Sheilbh on September 27, 2021, 11:46:41 AM
Quote from: Barrister on September 27, 2021, 11:44:40 AM
Been a long time but I thought Red October's use of Russian subjected the audience to Connery's really bad fake Russian accent.  I don't otherwise recall how they "handled" the language question.

Although Harrison Ford's Russian accent in K-19 was even worse!
They start in Russian and then casually segue into English - so we were exposed to Connery's really bad fake Russian. Tragically Russians were exposed to Connery's, what I can only imagine was even worse, actual Russian :lol:

Segue into English was better handled IMO in a movie by the same director, the 13th Warrior.

A great scene in a not great movie.

That movie had a troubled story, could have been much better but I still like it.

Josquius

Quote from: Duque de Bragança on September 27, 2021, 01:10:39 PM
Quote from: Tyr on September 27, 2021, 11:02:54 AM
Quote from: Duque de Bragança on September 27, 2021, 10:22:13 AM
Quote from: Tyr on September 27, 2021, 07:18:40 AM

Its funny that this in this alternative near-future most people seem to speak French.

Tyr's bigotry is hilarious.  :lol:

:unsure:
You think it realistic a European space mission would be French speaking and that an American mission would conveniently have 3 French speakers?

In a French series, yes. Not so many Anglo actors available. Plus, a European space mission can't rely only on the residual Anglophones (Irish). It's post-Brexit, remember.  :P

The dude running it is Swiss. I don't think Britain need be excluded :p
It strikes me realistically even excluding Brits (one of the main Americans is obviously British.) and having no native anglophones on the ship they'd be chatting in English.

But yes. It being a French series is the reason why. Just funny to take it seriously.
██████
██████
██████

The Brain

A Classic Horror Story. In the vein of The Ritual and Midsommar. Not essential viewing, it's kind of hamfisted and doesn't maintain energy. But the chicks are hot.

I often get the feeling when I watch movies that the moviemakers haven't thought through what the purpose is of each scene, and if it actually does its job efficiently and effectively. A movie is like a dogfight, you must maintain energy and every move must have a purpose. Some moviemakers seem to think "OK in this scene this and this will happen". NO! What happens is just a means to an end, you must keep your eyes on the purpose of the scene.
Women want me. Men want to be with me.

Eddie Teach

Quote from: crazy canuck on September 27, 2021, 01:03:25 PM
Quote from: HVC on September 27, 2021, 10:24:14 AM
Quote from: Eddie Teach on September 26, 2021, 09:55:14 PM
Squid Game. Pretty messed up.

i watched it too. can't decide if i like it. [spoiler] i did guess right that the old man was involved some how, he just seemed too out of place [/spoiler]

I really liked the blunt social commentary and character development. [spoiler]but I think it would have been better to end it with the one season.   Not sure where they go from here. [/spoiler]

But, Money!
To sleep, perchance to dream. But in that sleep of death, what dreams may come?

crazy canuck

Quote from: Eddie Teach on September 27, 2021, 05:34:42 PM
Quote from: crazy canuck on September 27, 2021, 01:03:25 PM
Quote from: HVC on September 27, 2021, 10:24:14 AM
Quote from: Eddie Teach on September 26, 2021, 09:55:14 PM
Squid Game. Pretty messed up.

i watched it too. can't decide if i like it. [spoiler] i did guess right that the old man was involved some how, he just seemed too out of place [/spoiler]

I really liked the blunt social commentary and character development. [spoiler]but I think it would have been better to end it with the one season.   Not sure where they go from here. [/spoiler]

But, Money!

[spoiler]Yeah, I especially liked how everyone freaked out when they realized what the game was, voted to end it (with the old guy casting the deciding vote) and then most everyone decided to come back when they realized just how shit their debt burdened lives were.  The old guy had seen it all before and so knew it would be better for them to come back with full knowledge of what they were getting into.  It was a great analogy for the poor selling themselves into slavery[/spoiler]

Syt

https://www.theverge.com/2021/9/27/22696836/babylon-5-reboot-j-michael-straczynski-warner-bros-the-cw

QuoteThe beloved Babylon 5 is getting rebooted, and series creator JMS is running the show

We thought it would never happen, but here we go

In 1994, J. Michael Straczynski (Sense8, Changeling) brought the world a science fiction show like nothing we'd ever seen. Babylon 5 told a single five-year story, filled with foreshadowing, deep political intrigue, and characters who grew and evolved, at a time when most TV shows still reset the agenda after every single episode. He wrote the vast majority of the award-winning show himself, and it appears he may be about to do it again — Warner Bros. Television is now in development on a "from-the-ground-up reboot" of Babylon 5 with Straczynski as writer and showrunner, designed to air on the CW.

Here's the full description Warner Bros. provided to The Verge:

In a from-the-ground-up reboot of the original series, John Sheridan, an Earthforce officer with a mysterious background, is assigned to Babylon 5, a five-mile-long space station in neutral space, a port of call for travelers, smugglers, corporate explorers and alien diplomats at a time of uneasy peace and the constant threat of war. His arrival triggers a destiny beyond anything he could have imagined, as an exploratory Earth company accidentally triggers a conflict with a civilization a million years ahead of us, putting Sheridan and the rest of the B5 crew in the line of fire as the last, best hope for the survival of the human race.

That's pretty much a dead-on description of the original show, minus some big surprises. So as a long-time fan myself, I have extremely mixed feelings!

In one sense, it's pretty exciting because Straczynski told fans for years that Warner Bros. wanted nothing to do with the show ever again. "They literally told my agent 'We have no plans, and no intentions, of letting anything else be done in terms of television with Babylon 5,'" he tweeted in 2018, and that seemed to be that.

So if Warner Bros. and Straczynski have now abandoned their feud and might expand on the intriguing universe JMS built nearly three decades ago, that's pretty exciting. But if it's just a straight reboot rather than a sequel or spin-off, one aimed at the CW at that, it makes me wonder why bother — particularly when the excellent original series has a newly remastered version you can stream on HBO Max and purchase via Amazon and iTunes since January of this year.

A few hours after we published this post, Straczynski tweeted his answer:

To answer all the questions, yes, it's true, Babylon 5 is in active development as a series for the CW. We have some serious fans over at the network, and they're eager to see this show happen. I'm hip deep into writing the pilot now, and will be running the series upon pickup. The network understands the uniqueness of Babylon 5 and is giving me a great deal of latitude with the storytelling.

As noted in the announcement, this is a reboot from the ground up rather than a continuation, for several reasons. Heraclitus wrote "You cannot step in the same river twice, for the river has changed, and you have changed." In the years since B5, I've done a ton of other TV shows and movies, adding an equal number of tools to my toolbox, all of which I can bring to bear on one singular question: if I were creating Babylon 5 today, for the first time, knowing what I now know as a writer, what would it look like? How would it use all the storytelling tools and technological resources available in 2021 that were not on hand then?

How can it be used to reflect the world in which we live, and the questions we are asking and confronting every day? Fans regularly point out how prescient the show was and is of our current world; it would be fun to take a shot at looking further down the road. So we will not be retelling the same story in the same way because of what Heraclitus said about the river. There would be no fun and no surprises. Better to go the way of Westworld or Battlestar Galactica where you take the original elements that are evergreens and put them in a blender with a ton of new, challenging ideas, to create something fresh yet familiar. To those asking why not just do a continuation, for a network series like this, it can't be done because over half our cast are still stubbornly on the other side of the Rim.

How do you telling continuing story of our original Londo without the original Vir? Or G'Kar? How do you tell Sheridan's story without Delenn? Or the story of B5 without Franklin? Garibaldi? Zack?

The original Babylon 5 was ridiculously innovative: the first to use CGI to create ships and characters, and among the very first to shoot widescreen with a vigorous 5.1 mix. Most of all, for the first time, Babylon 5 introduced viewers accustomed to episodic television to the concept of a five-year arc with a pre-planned beginning, middle and end...creating a brand new paradigm for television storytelling that has subsequently become the norm. That tradition for innovation will continue in this new iteration, and I hope to create additional new forms of storytelling that will further push the television medium to the edge of what's possible.

Let me conclude by just saying how supportive and enthusiastic everyone at the CW has been and is being with this project. They understand the unique position Babylon 5 occupies both in television and with its legions of fans, and are doing everything they can to ensure the maximum in creative freedom, a new story that will bring in new viewers while honoring all that has come before.

Onward!


I should add that the remastered version still has its issues. Engadget has a great story about why the original Babylon 5 will never look its best, partly due to aging CGI that might have looked groundbreaking at the time. Some of the early episodes feature hamfisted plots, scenery-chewing actors and a general lack of subtlety, and I can see how they might turn off a modern audience used to shows like The Expanse. (Straczynski certainly still seems to feel the first season is worth it, and I think you'd lose a lot by skipping it.)

And while the remaster's 4:3 transfer does an excellent job of cleaning up old artifacts and counteracting the bonkers decision to zoom in on the low-quality CG (see examples above and below), the noisy footage still doesn't necessarily look great on a 4K TV.

Still, there's never been a better time to watch Babylon 5 in the modern era than this remaster, which is so much better than the DVDs. You just might want this guide to the agreed-upon proper viewing orders since HBO Max and co. seem to have ordered the episodes in a new way entirely.

I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein's brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops.
—Stephen Jay Gould

Proud owner of 42 Zoupa Points.

The Brain

Will they have enough budget for decent lighting this time?
Women want me. Men want to be with me.