News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

Gadafi addresses the UN General Council

Started by Savonarola, September 23, 2009, 02:49:36 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Sheilbh

Quote from: Barrister on September 23, 2009, 06:32:59 PM
I thought we were boycotting A-jad's speech.
The EU tends to walk out when his speeches get extreme.  It makes for good TV :)
Let's bomb Russia!

Valmy

Quote from: Hansmeister on September 23, 2009, 06:12:45 PM
Ghaddafi's speech was almost as bad as Obama's, now the question is if Ahmedinejad can top them both.

I find it hard to believe he was able to outdo Stalinobamahitler.
Quote"This is a Russian warship. I propose you lay down arms and surrender to avoid bloodshed & unnecessary victims. Otherwise, you'll be bombed."

Zmiinyi defenders: "Russian warship, go fuck yourself."

KRonn

Quote from: The Minsky Moment on September 23, 2009, 04:10:36 PM
He has a point.

If the Security Council was properly doing its job, it would have bombed the living bejeezus out of Libya for its brutal war of aggression against Chad.
He probably wasn't thinking that of course....  :lol:

KRonn

Was it a large walk out on the Iranian President? I missed it, must have been watching Glenn Beck or Kieth Olberman...   ;)

DontSayBanana

Isn't it obvious? He's lining up to smite his enemies with the Gadafi-stick:



:nerd:
Experience bij!

Mr.Penguin

Real men drag their Guns into position

Spell check is for losers

Admiral Yi

Bad time to get your panties wedged up your ass.

Martinus

Quote from: Ed Anger on September 23, 2009, 06:14:42 PM
Quote from: Hansmeister on September 23, 2009, 06:12:45 PM
Ghaddafi's speech was almost as bad as Obama's, now the question is if Ahmedinejad can top them both.

Good job dropping Obama in there.



God I love that clip. :D

Razgovory

Quote from: The Minsky Moment on September 23, 2009, 04:10:36 PM
He has a point.

If the Security Council was properly doing its job, it would have bombed the living bejeezus out of Libya for its brutal war of aggression against Chad.

It was brutal all right.  His army got it's ass kicked by guys in pick up trucks.
I've given it serious thought. I must scorn the ways of my family, and seek a Japanese woman to yield me my progeny. He shall live in the lands of the east, and be well tutored in his sacred trust to weave the best traditions of Japan and the Sacred South together, until such time as he (or, indeed his house, which will periodically require infusion of both Southern and Japanese bloodlines of note) can deliver to the South it's independence, either in this world or in space.  -Lettow April of 2011

Raz is right. -MadImmortalMan March of 2017

Monoriu

Quote from: Razgovory on September 24, 2009, 02:31:00 AM
Quote from: The Minsky Moment on September 23, 2009, 04:10:36 PM
He has a point.

If the Security Council was properly doing its job, it would have bombed the living bejeezus out of Libya for its brutal war of aggression against Chad.

It was brutal all right.  His army got it's ass kicked by guys in pick up trucks.

Not just pick-up trucks.  TOYOTA pick-up trucks.

Mr.Penguin

Quote from: Monoriu on September 24, 2009, 03:10:09 AM
Quote from: Razgovory on September 24, 2009, 02:31:00 AM
Quote from: The Minsky Moment on September 23, 2009, 04:10:36 PM
He has a point.

If the Security Council was properly doing its job, it would have bombed the living bejeezus out of Libya for its brutal war of aggression against Chad.

It was brutal all right.  His army got it's ass kicked by guys in pick up trucks.

Not just pick-up trucks.  TOYOTA pick-up trucks.

And everyone knows that Toyota pick-up trucks are indestructable, havnt you seen top-gear?...
Real men drag their Guns into position

Spell check is for losers

Caliga

Quote from: Admiral Yi on September 24, 2009, 12:38:51 AM
Bad time to get your panties wedged up your ass.
Those chicks must be from his chick commando bodyguard unit.  :cool:
0 Ed Anger Disapproval Points

Maximus


Savonarola

Quote from: Hansmeister on September 23, 2009, 06:12:45 PM
Ghaddafi's speech was almost as bad as Obama's, now the question is if Ahmedinejad can top them both.

From Al-Jazeera:

QuoteIran hits out at Western 'terror' 



Iran's president has launched a scathing attack on Western powers, accusing them of spreading "war, bloodshed, aggression, terror and intimidation" in the Middle East and Afghanistan.

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad told the UN General Assembly on Wednesday that Tehran was "prepared to warmly shake all those hands which are honestly extended to us".

But he accused the West of hypocrisy - saying it preached democracy yet violated its fundamental principles - and added that it was time for the world to respond.

"The awakening of nations and the expansion of freedom worldwide will no longer allow them to continue their hypocrisy and vicious attitudes," he said.

'Inhuman policies'

He also spoke out against Israel for its "barbaric" attack on the Gaza Strip, "inhuman policies" in the Palestinian territories and what he called its domination of world political and economic affairs.

"How can crimes of the occupiers against defenceless women and children and destruction of their homes, farms, hospitals and schools be supported unconditionally by certain governments?"

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Iran's president

"How can crimes of the occupiers against defenceless women and children and destruction of their homes, farms, hospitals and schools be supported unconditionally by certain governments?

"It is no longer acceptable that a small minority would dominate the politics, economy and culture of major parts of the world by its complicated networks, and establish a new form of slavery, and harm the reputation of other nations, even European nations and the US, to attain its racist ambitions," he said.

Already speaking to a half-empty chamber, his attacks on Israel prompted walkouts by several delegations, including the US one.

Under increasing pressure over his country's nuclear programme, Ahmadinejad did not directly address the issue, calling only for the "eradication of arms race and elimination of all nuclear, chemical and biological weapons to pave the way for all nations to have access to advanced and peaceful technologies".

Moments before he spoke, foreign ministers of six global powers demanded Iran prepare a "serious response" by October 1 to demands it halt its nuclear programme or face serious consequences.

'Seize the opportunity'

Earlier in the day, Barack Obama, the US president, took Iran to task for its nuclear ambitions, warning that Tehran was running short of time and urging it to "seize the opportunity" at the talks with the five permanent UN Security Council members and Germany.


Ahmadinejad has said he will not negotiate on Iran's right to enrich uranium [EPA]
Hillary Mann Leverett, who has worked with the US National Security Council and state department, told Al Jazeera that Ahmadinejad had "very forcefully" taken on Obama in his address.

"I think Ahmadinejad really put the issue of double standards on the table - double standards over nuclear, double standards over what he called 'military occupation'," she said.

The International Atomic Energy Agency says Iran has not been forthcoming about its nuclear programme and the UN Security Council has imposed sanctions against Iran three times since 2006 for its refusal to freeze uranium enrichment.

Tougher sanctions against Iran are being considered if the October 1 talks between the six powers and Iran do not yield results.

Russian move

In a sign that Russian and the US could be moving closer on how to deal with Iran's nuclear programme, Moscow, which has stood in the way of stronger action against Tehran in the past, also came out on Wednesday to say Iran should not be allowed to develop nuclear weapons.

Dmitry Medvedev, the Russian president, also appeared to suggest that Moscow was moving closer to backing fresh sanctions against Iran, saying that while such tactics were rarely productive, "in some cases sanctions are inevitable".

"Our task is to maintain a system of incentives allowing Iran to use peaceful nuclear energy but [we] will not allow the creation of nuclear weapons," Medvedev said after meeting Obama on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly.

He added that the world should offer incentives "to help Iran make the right decision".

The US and its allies believe Iran is trying to produce nuclear weapons, while Tehran maintains that it is only building a peaceful nuclear energy programme.

Ahmadinejad has said he expects "free and open" discussions at the October 1 meeting but insists that Iran will not negotiate uranium enrichment.

Crazy, yes, but I've got to give Mad Mo the Gold.  Bringing up the JFK assassination is refreshing and different; while "Jews rule the world" is what I expected out of Ahmadinejad.
In Italy, for thirty years under the Borgias, they had warfare, terror, murder and bloodshed, but they produced Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci and the Renaissance. In Switzerland, they had brotherly love, they had five hundred years of democracy and peace—and what did that produce? The cuckoo clock

The Minsky Moment

Quote from: FunkMonk on September 23, 2009, 06:55:49 PM
Would it kill Ahmadinejad to wear a goddamn tie every now and then?  :bowler:

Yes - contrary to the policy of the Islamic republic.
The purpose of studying economics is not to acquire a set of ready-made answers to economic questions, but to learn how to avoid being deceived by economists.
--Joan Robinson