BLM: Israel guilty of genocide of Palestinians, stop US aid

[Hamilcar]

It's not. It's just that the idea of a political group of African-Americans haunts the nightmares of white supremacists.

Is it possible to be critical of the BLM without being a white supremacist?

According to modern intersectional race theory, no.

[garbon]

It's not. It's just that the idea of a political group of African-Americans haunts the nightmares of white supremacists.

Is it possible to be critical of the BLM without being a white supremacist?

According to modern intersectional race theory, no.

Oh, sweetie, don't use terms that you don't understand.

[Hamilcar]

It's not. It's just that the idea of a political group of African-Americans haunts the nightmares of white supremacists.

Is it possible to be critical of the BLM without being a white supremacist?

According to modern intersectional race theory, no.

Oh, sweetie, don't use terms that you don't understand.

Why? Hasn't stopped the insane postmodern "scholars" which gave birth to the garbage the BLM people quote.

[Josquius]

Black lives matter is a racial supremacist group?

Their demands include free college education and minimum guaranteed income (not wage!) for all black people, special subsidies for businesses owned by blacks, special funding for majority-black universities, etc. That's pretty racist/racial supremacist to me. In fact the only country I can think of with similar law-enshrined discriminatory treatment based on race is apartheid South Africa.

....All I've seen from them is stop shooting black people for no reason.
Didn't even realise it was a centralised political party.

They have announced a platform. You could know that if you read the article I posted in the first post. 

You didn't read the article? Seriously?

The point is there is no they. They're not a single united party.
And no matter what typical stuff they say about Israel or other silly stuff in the BLM name it doesn't mean they don't have valid points otherwise.

[garbon]

It's not. It's just that the idea of a political group of African-Americans haunts the nightmares of white supremacists.

Is it possible to be critical of the BLM without being a white supremacist?

According to modern intersectional race theory, no.

Oh, sweetie, don't use terms that you don't understand.

Why? Hasn't stopped the insane postmodern "scholars" which gave birth to the garbage the BLM people quote.

And that's what you aim to be?

[Valmy]

You didn't read the article? Seriously?

The point is there is no they. They're not a single united party.
And no matter what typical stuff they say about Israel or other silly stuff in the BLM name it doesn't mean they don't have valid points otherwise.

If there is no they and there is no single united party with an agenda and points then how exactly can the bolded part follow?

[grumbler]

You didn't read the article? Seriously?

The point is there is no they. They're not a single united party.
And no matter what typical stuff they say about Israel or other silly stuff in the BLM name it doesn't mean they don't have valid points otherwise.

If there is no they and there is no single united party with an agenda and points then how exactly can the bolded part follow?

  I don't think Tyr has actually thought through that position:  "there is no they, but they have valid points."

[CountDeMoney]

  I don't think Tyr has actually thought through that position:  "there is no they, but they have valid points."

So because "Black Lives Matter" doesn't have a charter or home office, black lives really don't matter?  Whew.  Hear that, derspieß?  You were right after all!

lol #Make501c3StrongAgain

[grumbler]

So because "Black Lives Matter" doesn't have a charter or home office, black lives really don't matter?  Whew.  Hear that, derspieß?  You were right after all!

lol #Make501c3StrongAgain

I didn't know that.  Hell, i didn't even know you were the person who decided that. 

[Valmy]

So because "Black Lives Matter" doesn't have a charter or home office, black lives really don't matter?

If they don't then they clearly don't think so, since they cannot be bothered to even do the minimal shit to be effective. Must not be very important.

But they have, so far as I can tell.

[garbon]

So because "Black Lives Matter" doesn't have a charter or home office, black lives really don't matter?

If they don't then they clearly don't think so, since they cannot be bothered to even do the minimal shit to be effective. Must not be very important.

[CountDeMoney]

Black Lives Matter:  No, It Wasn't What You Thought It Meant

[Savonarola]

I once went to an anti-WTO protest where a number of people got up to speak out against police brutality; so I guess it all balances out. 

[Josquius]

You didn't read the article? Seriously?

The point is there is no they. They're not a single united party.
And no matter what typical stuff they say about Israel or other silly stuff in the BLM name it doesn't mean they don't have valid points otherwise.

If there is no they and there is no single united party with an agenda and points then how exactly can the bolded part follow?

There is no "they" determining overall policy.
There is however a broad mass of people protesting against racism; generally and group by group against specific incidents. Usually pretty validly.

[CountDeMoney]

I once went to an anti-WTO protest where a number of people got up to speak out against police brutality; so I guess it all balances out.

Considering how Seattle PD went up in them Tiananmen Square donkey dick-style, I can appreciate how it made the agenda.