News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

Will the Left Survive the Millennials?

Started by Hamilcar, September 23, 2016, 01:08:58 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

The Minsky Moment

Quote from: Hamilcar on September 23, 2016, 02:00:41 PM
Well this is my question, being (I suspect) a bit younger than you. Did institutions back then yield so easily?

You had university campuses being occupied by force (not this softy OWS stuff), professors and administrators being harassed, physically blocked from their offices, loudly heckled and denounced in classrooms.  Far more serious stuff than some wimpy complaints about "micro-aggressions" prompting the uni to release some bureaucratic memo saying sing kumbaya like happens now.

As silly and annoying as this millennial whinyness and infantalism may be, it's a long way off from reaching the sheer zanyness and occasional menace of the New Left at its height in the late 60s and early 70s.
The purpose of studying economics is not to acquire a set of ready-made answers to economic questions, but to learn how to avoid being deceived by economists.
--Joan Robinson

Razgovory

Quote from: Berkut on September 23, 2016, 01:54:44 PM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on September 23, 2016, 01:35:07 PM
It's a reasonable argument.  Seems to me whenever you read about someone pushing back against PC idiocy it's almost always someone from an older generation, which raises the possibility that as Millenials age the idiocy will become an unchallenged orthodoxy, questioned only by alt-right "fuck her in the pussy" frat boy retards.

It's a completely reasonable argument.

It's one I've been making for a long, long time. If you insist that the moderates are evil because they refuse to bow to the radical extremism, what you will be left with is, well, Trump.

The left wants to blame the rise of Trumpism on the right, but in reality they are, at least, equally at fault, if not at greater fault. The demonization of the moderates in their own party (how many Blue Dogs are left?), and lumping all "Republicans" into the same bucket, has had as much to do with the polarization of discourse as anything Fox has done.

And the reverse is true as well - the loopy left sees how effective the rhetoric of exclusion and intolerance is from the far right, and they have decided they should give it a shot as well, but targetted at different groups is all, often their own.

It actually makes me kind of stunned that the crazy right might actually win this little culture war we are having, only because the regressive left is more worried about whether those on their own side are pure enough for their lofty "ideals" to be tolerated.

Yes, the Democratic party has shifted too far to the left.  That's why Bernie Sander's is now up against Trump.
I've given it serious thought. I must scorn the ways of my family, and seek a Japanese woman to yield me my progeny. He shall live in the lands of the east, and be well tutored in his sacred trust to weave the best traditions of Japan and the Sacred South together, until such time as he (or, indeed his house, which will periodically require infusion of both Southern and Japanese bloodlines of note) can deliver to the South it's independence, either in this world or in space.  -Lettow April of 2011

Raz is right. -MadImmortalMan March of 2017

The Minsky Moment

Quote from: Razgovory on September 23, 2016, 03:09:13 PM
Yes, the Democratic party has shifted too far to the left.  That's why Bernie Sander's is now up against Trump.

But his point is that the Democrats are now on the verge of defeat, in part because some of its potential supporters on the left are lukewarm and threatening to walk on the grounds of insufficient ideological purity.
The purpose of studying economics is not to acquire a set of ready-made answers to economic questions, but to learn how to avoid being deceived by economists.
--Joan Robinson

Razgovory

Quote from: The Minsky Moment on September 23, 2016, 01:58:56 PM
Quote from: Hamilcar on September 23, 2016, 01:36:32 PM
There is a lot to that but it seems to be (maybe the older ones here can correct me) is that in previous generation, society didn't indulge these kinds of tantrums.

We never had the New Left?  Radical chic?  Students occupying universities?  Manifestos denouncing capitalist rhetoric?

How quickly we forget.

Seriously.  The great movement of the left today, a handful of college kids camping in New York city to "Occupy Wallstreet".  The Great movement of the Left in the 1960's, riots and strikes that nearly cause the collapse of the French Government.
I've given it serious thought. I must scorn the ways of my family, and seek a Japanese woman to yield me my progeny. He shall live in the lands of the east, and be well tutored in his sacred trust to weave the best traditions of Japan and the Sacred South together, until such time as he (or, indeed his house, which will periodically require infusion of both Southern and Japanese bloodlines of note) can deliver to the South it's independence, either in this world or in space.  -Lettow April of 2011

Raz is right. -MadImmortalMan March of 2017

Razgovory

Quote from: The Minsky Moment on September 23, 2016, 03:11:12 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on September 23, 2016, 03:09:13 PM
Yes, the Democratic party has shifted too far to the left.  That's why Bernie Sander's is now up against Trump.

But his point is that the Democrats are now on the verge of defeat, in part because some of its potential supporters on the left are lukewarm and threatening to walk on the grounds of insufficient ideological purity.

Really?  He seems to be ranting on about how his beloved segregati- I mean, Blue Dogs are no longer a major part of the party. Something that has been true since the 1990's.

You'll have to ask him.  He won't talk to me.  He said I was too much of a radical leftist tribalist because in supporting Clinton over the moderate Sanders.
I've given it serious thought. I must scorn the ways of my family, and seek a Japanese woman to yield me my progeny. He shall live in the lands of the east, and be well tutored in his sacred trust to weave the best traditions of Japan and the Sacred South together, until such time as he (or, indeed his house, which will periodically require infusion of both Southern and Japanese bloodlines of note) can deliver to the South it's independence, either in this world or in space.  -Lettow April of 2011

Raz is right. -MadImmortalMan March of 2017

Valmy

Quote from: Razgovory on September 23, 2016, 03:18:24 PM
Really?  He seems to be ranting on about how his beloved segregati- I mean, Blue Dogs are no longer a major part of the party. Something that has been true since the 1990's.

How idiotic is it to announce that Berkut is a racist segregationist? This is just the kind of puritanical garbage he was talking about.

Quote"This is a Russian warship. I propose you lay down arms and surrender to avoid bloodshed & unnecessary victims. Otherwise, you'll be bombed."

Zmiinyi defenders: "Russian warship, go fuck yourself."

Duque de Bragança

Quote from: Razgovory on September 23, 2016, 03:14:06 PM
Quote from: The Minsky Moment on September 23, 2016, 01:58:56 PM
Quote from: Hamilcar on September 23, 2016, 01:36:32 PM
There is a lot to that but it seems to be (maybe the older ones here can correct me) is that in previous generation, society didn't indulge these kinds of tantrums.

We never had the New Left?  Radical chic?  Students occupying universities?  Manifestos denouncing capitalist rhetoric?

How quickly we forget.

Seriously.  The great movement of the left today, a handful of college kids camping in New York city to "Occupy Wallstreet".  The Great movement of the Left in the 1960's, riots and strikes that nearly cause the collapse of the French Government.

Nah, Moscow would never have allowed the Communist Trade Union to unite with mao/leftist/whatever students to topple De Gaulle. May '68 is more of a victory for individualism than anything else.

Martinus

Quote from: Valmy on September 23, 2016, 03:25:16 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on September 23, 2016, 03:18:24 PM
Really?  He seems to be ranting on about how his beloved segregati- I mean, Blue Dogs are no longer a major part of the party. Something that has been true since the 1990's.

How idiotic is it to announce that Berkut is a racist segregationist? This is just the kind of puritanical garbage he was talking about.

Raz is insane. He is desperately trying to fit in by embracing some bullshit extremist positions. He is better ignored than debated.

HVC

Quote from: Martinus on September 23, 2016, 03:30:15 PM
... is desperately trying to fit in by embracing some bullshit extremist positions. He is better ignored than debated.
kettle meet pot
Being lazy is bad; unless you still get what you want, then it's called "patience".
Hubris must be punished. Severely.

Admiral Yi

Quote from: HVC on September 23, 2016, 03:33:01 PM
kettle meet pot

You said you would hard return.  :mad:

Disagree that Marty is trying to fit in.  Seems to me he's pursuing some sophomoric strategy of antagonizing people to achieve some sort of iconoclastic ideal.

HVC

Quote from: Admiral Yi on September 23, 2016, 03:43:30 PM
Quote from: HVC on September 23, 2016, 03:33:01 PM
kettle meet pot

You said you would hard return.  :mad:


And I was doing so good :(

And I don't think he's doing it to fit into languish. He's doing it to fit into what he feels is a western counter culture so that he feels less like a backwoods Eastern European. That and because he's and an attention seeking ass :lol:
Being lazy is bad; unless you still get what you want, then it's called "patience".
Hubris must be punished. Severely.

Razgovory

#26
Quote from: Valmy on September 23, 2016, 03:25:16 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on September 23, 2016, 03:18:24 PM
Really?  He seems to be ranting on about how his beloved segregati- I mean, Blue Dogs are no longer a major part of the party. Something that has been true since the 1990's.

How idiotic is it to announce that Berkut is a racist segregationist? This is just the kind of puritanical garbage he was talking about.

Good thing I didn't say that, otherwise I'd be idiotic.  Berkut seems to have some odd idea about the conservative wing of the Democratic party that has migrated over to the Republicans since the 1940's. They are not noble fighters against the extreme left, they were segregationists.  I'm perfectly happy that the Strom Thurmond wing switched Republicans.  I think it comes with his obsessive interest in being "non-tribal".  Being a hard right member of a left-wing party doesn't make you noble or moderate or independent.  Likewise, blaming both democrats and republicans for Trump doesn't does not demonstrate your lack of tribe, only your lack of sense.
I've given it serious thought. I must scorn the ways of my family, and seek a Japanese woman to yield me my progeny. He shall live in the lands of the east, and be well tutored in his sacred trust to weave the best traditions of Japan and the Sacred South together, until such time as he (or, indeed his house, which will periodically require infusion of both Southern and Japanese bloodlines of note) can deliver to the South it's independence, either in this world or in space.  -Lettow April of 2011

Raz is right. -MadImmortalMan March of 2017

mongers

Damn, this thread topic is sub-par; come back Timmay all is forgiven.
"We have it in our power to begin the world over again"

Delirium

#28
Good topic and spot on. I was a lefty in the early 2000's but moved on from there. It is partly about growing up and becoming more conservative with age, but also because the left has changed over that time (not to mention since 1968).

The old left, at its best, was about changing society to create a better world for everyone. We were out campaigning against Shell in the late 80's for their supporting apartheid in South Africa (we were 15 years old).

The new left starts social media campaigns about multi-culturalism and that our differences should lead to respect. It leads to relativism. It is about defining groups, not creating societies.

If I were in a position of power and wanted to create a political radicalism for kids and dissidents to involve themselves with I would create a political movement that indulges completely in identity because it is in essence harmless and ultimately irrelevant to the big picture: namely economic distribution of wealth, something the new left do not care about more than selecting which minority should be getting a government grant this week.

The one thing the old and new left have in common is that everything is the United States' fault. And the Jews.

Come writers and critics who prophesize with your pen, and keep your eyes wide the chance won't come again; but don't speak too soon for the wheel's still in spin, and there's no telling who that it's naming. For the loser now will be later to win, cause the times they are a-changin'. -- B Dylan

Ed Anger

Stay Alive...Let the Man Drive