News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

Why the Navy Needs Disruption Now

Started by Baron von Schtinkenbutt, July 29, 2016, 05:52:45 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Ed Anger

Stay Alive...Let the Man Drive

Berkut

Quote from: grumbler on August 06, 2016, 08:01:36 PM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on August 06, 2016, 03:16:21 AM
I still say the Phantom had twice the charisma of the F14 and F15.  Thing looked like a flying muscle car.

It was a good-looking plane (not as good looking as the F-14 or F-15) but not a very good fighter.  The Navy had to take F-8s back from the reserves to get a front-line fighter in Vietnam.

It was really more of an interceptor, right?

Didn't they actually deploy it without a gun at first? Which of course did not work out so well when you don't have a free fire zone and have to actually ID your targets by Mk 1 eyeball before shooting...
"If you think this has a happy ending, then you haven't been paying attention."

select * from users where clue > 0
0 rows returned

MadBurgerMaker

#62
I always thought the Vigilante was pretty cool. Interesting way of delivering nukes too:  Just dump them out the ass end.  Sure, they might accidentally fall out on the carrier deck on launch, but hey, that's the price you pay for innovation.  :smarty:

The tiny bit of the wingtips that would fold was a nice touch too.  Now the wingspan is only gigantic, instead of absurdly stupid!  The "nose" wheel was set like 20 feet back as well.  Must have been fun to roll around on a flight deck in that.  Get an RA-5 in the air though, and it's slick as shit.

Tonitrus

Why did everything that is awesome about airpower come out of the 50's?  :(

Admiral Yi


MadBurgerMaker

Quote from: Admiral Yi on August 07, 2016, 01:04:31 AM
WTF?  The A4 was the Yugo of strike aircraft.

The A-4 is a cool little plane.

celedhring

The first airplane models I owned as a kid were a Phantom and a Stratojet. I concur that 1950s planes kicked ass. Huge fan of the B-47s rocket-assisted takeoff.

CountDeMoney

The A-6 should still be in service, goddammit.

grumbler

Quote from: Berkut on August 06, 2016, 09:36:36 PM
It was really more of an interceptor, right?

Didn't they actually deploy it without a gun at first? Which of course did not work out so well when you don't have a free fire zone and have to actually ID your targets by Mk 1 eyeball before shooting...

It was originally designed as a strike fighter, then redesigned as an interceptor when the A-7 was adopted by the Navy (its original strike fighter size meant it could carry the big radar and second crewman needed for that role), then adopted by the Air Force as a strike fighter.  It was never intended as a subsonic dogfighter because the Five-Sided Playpen was convinced back then that missiles and radar made subsonic gun fights obsolete.  That, obviously, was in error.
The future is all around us, waiting, in moments of transition, to be born in moments of revelation. No one knows the shape of that future or where it will take us. We know only that it is always born in pain.   -G'Kar

Bayraktar!

grumbler

Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on August 07, 2016, 01:44:10 AM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on August 07, 2016, 01:04:31 AM
WTF?  The A4 was the Yugo of strike aircraft.

The A-4 is a cool little plane.

And still in service, more than 60 years after its IOC.
The future is all around us, waiting, in moments of transition, to be born in moments of revelation. No one knows the shape of that future or where it will take us. We know only that it is always born in pain.   -G'Kar

Bayraktar!

celedhring

Quote from: CountDeMoney on August 07, 2016, 09:03:15 AM
The A-6 should still be in service, goddammit.

The Prowler is still in service. Doesn't that count?

grumbler

Quote from: celedhring on August 07, 2016, 01:28:59 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on August 07, 2016, 09:03:15 AM
The A-6 should still be in service, goddammit.

The Prowler is still in service. Doesn't that count?
(a) It's only in service with the USMC,
(b) it's not an A-6, it's an electronic warfare aircraft, so,
(c) no, it doesn't count. 
The future is all around us, waiting, in moments of transition, to be born in moments of revelation. No one knows the shape of that future or where it will take us. We know only that it is always born in pain.   -G'Kar

Bayraktar!

CountDeMoney


11B4V

Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on August 06, 2016, 10:37:52 PM
I always thought the Vigilante was pretty cool. Interesting way of delivering nukes too:  Just dump them out the ass end.  Sure, they might accidentally fall out on the carrier deck on launch, but hey, that's the price you pay for innovation.  :smarty:

The tiny bit of the wingtips that would fold was a nice touch too.  Now the wingspan is only gigantic, instead of absurdly stupid!  The "nose" wheel was set like 20 feet back as well.  Must have been fun to roll around on a flight deck in that.  Get an RA-5 in the air though, and it's slick as shit.

Sexy looking aircraft.
"there's a long tradition of insulting people we disagree with here, and I'll be damned if I listen to your entreaties otherwise."-OVB

"Obviously not a Berkut-commanded armored column.  They're not all brewing."- CdM

"We've reached one of our phase lines after the firefight and it smells bad—meaning it's a little bit suspicious... Could be an amb—".

grumbler

Quote from: 11B4V on August 07, 2016, 06:45:03 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on August 06, 2016, 10:37:52 PM
I always thought the Vigilante was pretty cool. Interesting way of delivering nukes too:  Just dump them out the ass end.  Sure, they might accidentally fall out on the carrier deck on launch, but hey, that's the price you pay for innovation.  :smarty:

The tiny bit of the wingtips that would fold was a nice touch too.  Now the wingspan is only gigantic, instead of absurdly stupid!  The "nose" wheel was set like 20 feet back as well.  Must have been fun to roll around on a flight deck in that.  Get an RA-5 in the air though, and it's slick as shit.

Sexy looking aircraft.

Another plane that looked good without being good.  The Vigilante had the highest loss rate of any US aircraft employed in Vietnam, even though, for much of the war, the navy refused to fly them over the north.  The Navy stopped production after 120 had been built, but was then forced to order 36 more because of the high loss rate.  Vigilante squadrons were not happy squadrons.
The future is all around us, waiting, in moments of transition, to be born in moments of revelation. No one knows the shape of that future or where it will take us. We know only that it is always born in pain.   -G'Kar

Bayraktar!