Brexit and the waning days of the United Kingdom

Started by Josquius, February 20, 2016, 07:46:34 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

How would you vote on Britain remaining in the EU?

British- Remain
12 (12%)
British - Leave
7 (7%)
Other European - Remain
21 (21%)
Other European - Leave
6 (6%)
ROTW - Remain
34 (34%)
ROTW - Leave
20 (20%)

Total Members Voted: 98

PJL

Scexit sound terrible, Scoxit is better.

Josquius

██████
██████
██████

Zanza

Just read a bit about WTO "schedules", which is the way the WTO defines the terms of trade (especialy tariffs) for its members. The UK doesn't have its own schedule, but rather is part of the European Union schedule. When it leaves the EU, it's unclear whether that schedule still applies to the UK or not. If not, they have to negotiate a new schedule with the rest of the world and as far as I can tell, it needs unanimous consent. If the EU schedule still applies, they would still have to renegotiate it at some point of time or otherwise they are still bound by whatever the EU once defined when it joined the WTO, hardly "taking back sovereignity".

Josquius

Unanimous consent from the world?
Jesus. There goes the kippers talk of the wto as some magic bullet default :lol:
Britain is truly fucked isn't it.
██████
██████
██████

Tamas

Quote from: Zanza on December 12, 2016, 04:48:38 PM
Just read a bit about WTO "schedules", which is the way the WTO defines the terms of trade (especialy tariffs) for its members. The UK doesn't have its own schedule, but rather is part of the European Union schedule. When it leaves the EU, it's unclear whether that schedule still applies to the UK or not. If not, they have to negotiate a new schedule with the rest of the world and as far as I can tell, it needs unanimous consent. If the EU schedule still applies, they would still have to renegotiate it at some point of time or otherwise they are still bound by whatever the EU once defined when it joined the WTO, hardly "taking back sovereignity".

:lol: :bleeding: :frusty:

celedhring

So, our government wants to revive the tax breaks (which the socialists had eliminated) for foreign high-earners moving to Spain, with the excuse of attracting Brexit economic immigrants. Back when it was in force it was derisively called "The Beckham Act" since it ended up favoring footballers signing for La Liga teams.  :glare:

Zanza

Quote from: Tyr on December 13, 2016, 02:11:18 AM
Unanimous consent from the world?
Jesus. There goes the kippers talk of the wto as some magic bullet default :lol:
Britain is truly fucked isn't it.
At least I can't see anything in the WTO descriptions that would describe a part of a customs union breaking away from the rest of the customs union and what that means for the schedules that were originally agreed by that customs union. I guess they just never defined this case, because it wasn't relevant. Other than the EU, only individual countries (or sometimes sub-country units, e.g. Hong Kong) are part of the WTO. And individual countries very rarely split up. The last I can think of, Sudan and Yugoslavia don't seem to have been members (Yugoslavia withdrew from GATT), so there is no reference.

PJL

Quote from: celedhring on December 13, 2016, 04:57:17 AM
So, our government wants to revive the tax breaks (which the socialists had eliminated) for foreign high-earners moving to Spain, with the excuse of attracting Brexit economic immigrants. Back when it was in force it was derisively called "The Beckham Act" since it ended up favoring footballers signing for La Liga teams.  :glare:

The EPL is a good example of how companies prefer to buy 'cheaper' foreigners rather than train up new domestic players. Something which is prevalent throughout British industry and where immigration is seen as the cheap option to training.

celedhring

#4568
Quote from: PJL on December 13, 2016, 01:42:08 PM
Quote from: celedhring on December 13, 2016, 04:57:17 AM
So, our government wants to revive the tax breaks (which the socialists had eliminated) for foreign high-earners moving to Spain, with the excuse of attracting Brexit economic immigrants. Back when it was in force it was derisively called "The Beckham Act" since it ended up favoring footballers signing for La Liga teams.  :glare:

The EPL is a good example of how companies prefer to buy 'cheaper' foreigners rather than train up new domestic players. Something which is prevalent throughout British industry and where immigration is seen as the cheap option to training.

I think it's more a case of the local talent just not being enough when you're the top player in an industry. We're talking about a pool of a single nation vs the entire footballing world; when you're at the top of the food chain (like the EPL is), you employ the absolute best, and no matter how hard you train local talent, most of the time the absolute best will be overseas. Top English players (even when they're not really that good), also sell for and earn absurd money in the EPL.

So like with most things Brexit... sure, turn your back on the world, you will be more English, but you no longer will be one of the best.

Richard Hakluyt

The industry around formula one racing is another area where the UK has done exceedingly well :

http://thejupital.com/the-british-formula-one-economy/

As with the premier league it is an incredibly international venture and relies on the UK being open to the world.

Duque de Bragança

Formula One racing is also far less popular that it used to be 20 years ago i.e Senna and Prost times.

Tamas

Quote from: Duque de Bragança on December 14, 2016, 06:47:09 AM
Formula One racing is also far less popular that it used to be 20 years ago i.e Senna and Prost times.

I am not sure. I certainly don't follow it anymore but seems to be a pretty big thing still.

Agelastus

Quote from: Tamas on December 14, 2016, 07:53:38 AM
Quote from: Duque de Bragança on December 14, 2016, 06:47:09 AM
Formula One racing is also far less popular that it used to be 20 years ago i.e Senna and Prost times.

I am not sure. I certainly don't follow it anymore but seems to be a pretty big thing still.

For broadcast rights I think you're right, for the moment. However, all too many of the "new" races (reflecting the move away from Europe) have trouble attracting race-day crowds.

When you've built a circuit that can accommodate 120000 over three days and you only get 40000 that's a hole in your financial plan right there.

With the costs of staging a race going up-and-up there's a real question of how long some of the new overseas races will last, and if F1 is forced to turn back to Europe due to a lack of venues overseas they're not going to get the prices they're currently charging for the privilege of hosting a race from the European circuits and organisers (not after the way they've been gradually priced out by Bernie.)
"Come grow old with me
The Best is yet to be
The last of life for which the first was made."

celedhring

#4573
What's also happening is that they are moving fully towards a pay model. So viewership figures are down, but they are earning more money. There's a question of whether this will reduce the exposure of the sport in the long run, as casual fans and potential fans will watch less races once they are all behind a paywall.

This is a trend in all sports though. Football is doing the same. MotoGP is doing the same.

Valmy

Quote from: celedhring on December 14, 2016, 08:21:03 AM
What's also happening is that they are moving fully towards a pay model. So viewership figures are down, but they are earning more money. There's a question of whether this will reduce the exposure of the sport in the long run, as casual fans and potential fans will watch less races once they are all behind a paywall.

This is a trend in all sports though. Football is doing the same. MotoGP is doing the same.

Yet another thing that started as the contemptible pastime of the plebs eventually becomes the exclusive playground of the rich.
Quote"This is a Russian warship. I propose you lay down arms and surrender to avoid bloodshed & unnecessary victims. Otherwise, you'll be bombed."

Zmiinyi defenders: "Russian warship, go fuck yourself."