Iran Nuclear Deal Highlights: The Good, the Bad, the Complicated

Started by jimmy olsen, July 14, 2015, 07:33:12 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

crazy canuck

Quote from: Malthus on July 16, 2015, 04:57:14 PM
Quote from: crazy canuck on July 16, 2015, 04:40:37 PM
Quote from: Malthus on July 16, 2015, 03:17:38 PM
The problem is that we may be looking at a "30 Year's War - Islamic Style" situation developing.

Yeah, but that is a better problem than ISIL winning in 5.

Maybe, maybe not. 

The 'best case' is that, with increased support from Iran, Shi'ite militias and Sunni opponents put down ISIS like rabid dogs, and then work out some sort of peace among themselves.

The 'worst case' is that Iranian support for Shi'ia militias discredits the existing Sunni opposition to ISIS, leading to an increase in ISIS support from Sunnis generally - that is, gives a boost to Sunni radicalism led by its current champions, ISIS, who are able to position themselves as the only real armed response to Shi'ism. That would suck, as it may well widen the conflict and end up with ISIS being even stronger than it is now.

Yeah, that is possible.  One this is certain.  The Islamic religious war was long predicted and I am not sure why the West has been backing the most radical form of the Sunni side in that war.

Valmy

Quote from: Malthus on July 16, 2015, 04:02:58 PM
My impression is that the Deal is a move towards more of that; that prior to the Deal, the US mood was closer to the notion that both sides were 'bad' in their own way. The Deal, it strikes me, indicates not "normalization" exactly but more of a sense that the Iranians should be taken off the leash.

Even after we did so much for them in Iraq and Afghanistan? Seems to me we have clearly been saying they are better than the alternative for a long time. And we tried to have better relations with them for awhile but then they elected that nutcase.
Quote"This is a Russian warship. I propose you lay down arms and surrender to avoid bloodshed & unnecessary victims. Otherwise, you'll be bombed."

Zmiinyi defenders: "Russian warship, go fuck yourself."

PJL

ISIS taking over Saudi Arabia would make no difference, mainly because Saudi Arabia IS ISIS, just in another guise. Or rather it's vice versa.

Razgovory

Quote from: PJL on July 16, 2015, 05:47:06 PM
ISIS taking over Saudi Arabia would make no difference, mainly because Saudi Arabia IS ISIS, just in another guise. Or rather it's vice versa.

I rather think it would bother all the foreign workers there.  Cutting off the heads of 9 million people would probably be noticed.
I've given it serious thought. I must scorn the ways of my family, and seek a Japanese woman to yield me my progeny. He shall live in the lands of the east, and be well tutored in his sacred trust to weave the best traditions of Japan and the Sacred South together, until such time as he (or, indeed his house, which will periodically require infusion of both Southern and Japanese bloodlines of note) can deliver to the South it's independence, either in this world or in space.  -Lettow April of 2011

Raz is right. -MadImmortalMan March of 2017

Archy

Quote from: Malthus on July 16, 2015, 04:57:14 PM
Quote from: crazy canuck on July 16, 2015, 04:40:37 PM
Quote from: Malthus on July 16, 2015, 03:17:38 PM
We need zombie Kitchener and some maxim guns. That'll teach those Savage neo-mahdists.
The problem is that we may be looking at a "30 Year's War - Islamic Style" situation developing.

Yeah, but that is a better problem than ISIL winning in 5.

Maybe, maybe not. 

The 'best case' is that, with increased support from Iran, Shi'ite militias and Sunni opponents put down ISIS like rabid dogs, and then work out some sort of peace among themselves.

The 'worst case' is that Iranian support for Shi'ia militias discredits the existing Sunni opposition to ISIS, leading to an increase in ISIS support from Sunnis generally - that is, gives a boost to Sunni radicalism led by its current champions, ISIS, who are able to position themselves as the only real armed response to Shi'ism. That would suck, as it may well widen the conflict and end up with ISIS being even stronger than it is now.

jimmy olsen

It begins!  :ph34r:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_east/carter-vows-to-help-saudi-arabia-contain-irans-regional-ambitions/2015/07/22/db535af8-2ff3-11e5-a879-213078d03dd3_story.html

QuoteCarter vows to help Saudi Arabia contain Iran's regional ambitions

By Missy Ryan July 22 at 3:58 PM    


JIDDAH, Saudi Arabia — Saudi and U.S. leaders agreed Wednesday to curb Iran's military reach across the Middle East, amid fears that last week's nuclear deal with Tehran would encourage it to pursue more aggressive regional ambitions.

Defense Secretary Ashton B. Carter held talks with Saudi Arabia's king and its defense minister in the seaside city of Jiddah, where Saudi officials have decamped for the Muslim holiday of Eid al-Fitr, as he tours Middle Eastern nations that are anxious about the Iran accord.

As the region's largest Sunni power, Saudi Arabia has privately issued warnings about the deal, which would curb Shiite Iran's nuclear program in exchange for the easing of economic sanctions, and those warnings carry weight in Washington. At the end of the Iran nuclear talks, the Saudi government threatened "harsh and determined responses" if Tehran used the proceeds of sanctions relief to enhance support for proxy groups in the region, including Shiite Houthi rebels in Yemen.


But U.S. officials said King Salman voiced solid support for the Iran agreement in his talks with Carter. The monarch noted, however, that the accord must be accompanied by a strong inspections program and measures to put sanctions back in place should Iran violate its terms.

The talks, the first face-to-face encounter between a top Obama administration official and the Saudi leader since the deal was struck July 14, also addressed the deepening conflict in Yemen. More than 3,000 people have been killed there since a Saudi-led coalition began airstrikes in late March against the Houthis, who Riyadh says receive backing from Iran.

In recent days, forces loyal to Saudi Arabia and embattled Yemeni President Abed Rabbo Mansour Hadi have made major gains against the Houthis, boosting Saudi efforts to reinstall the exiled president.

Carter, speaking to reporters after talks with the Saudi leaders, said he shared their fears about Iran's influence in Yemen. But he noted that a political solution is crucial.

"The Iranian influence with the Houthis is real," Carter said, but he insisted that "what Yemen needs is a political settlement that allows peace to be restored."

Richard LeBaron, a former U.S. ambassador to Kuwait who is a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council, said the military campaign against the Houthis offers Saudi leaders an opportunity to evaluate the post-deal realities in the region.

"It's a test case of their ability to project power against what they see as an Iranian proxy with direct Iranian involvement . . . especially as, in their view, Iran emerges from the shadows because of the nuclear deal," he said. "It's also a test case of U.S. support for Saudi Arabia."

Washington has sought to reassure friendly Persian Gulf nations that it is a reliable ally despite their misgivings about the Iran deal, which the United States pursued alongside five other world powers. In recent months, the U.S. military has provided intelligence and logistical support to the Saudi campaign in Yemen and has placed personnel at a Saudi operations center where targets are selected.

It also is accelerating weapons shipments and continuing sales of military hardware, including Seahawk maritime helicopters and Patriot missile defense systems.

But whether the Saudi-led coalition will prevent the spread of Iranian influence on the Arabian Peninsula remains unknown.

A Western diplomat, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss the conflict, said that Iran and Hezbollah, the Tehran-backed Shiite armed movement in Lebanon, have sent advisers to Yemen. He declined to say how many but noted that even a dozen could have a notable effect by teaching Houthis to operate sophisticated weapons.

Last month, Houthi forces fired a Scud missile into Saudi Arabia. The missile was shot down, but the attack underscored that the group could adopt more sophisticated military technology.

"Over the last four months, the conditions have really allowed Iran to flood the zone," the diplomat said.

U.S. officials, however, have been hesitant to embrace the Saudi assertion that the Houthis provide Iran with a proxy force that could easily become a permanent military power akin to Hezbollah or Shiite militias in Iraq. "They are essentially Yemeni, and they are part of the spectrum of Yemeni political parties," the diplomat said.

Advertisement


U.S. officials also hope that Saudi Arabia will prove a strong partner in combating the Islamic State, whose advances have pulled the Obama administration back into Iraq, and other extremist groups such as al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), which has a strong presence in Yemen.

U.S. objectives may diverge from those of Saudi Arabia when it comes to the groups in Yemen, where AQAP has plotted attacks on U.S. soil but Houthi rebels, despite their distaste for the United States, have not.

The diplomat said Saudi Arabia remains "deeply concerned" about al-Qaeda and the Islamic State but prefers to save that fight until the defeat of the Iranian-allied rebels is assured. "They see that the first order of business is restoring a legitimate government" in Yemen, he said.

It is far better for the truth to tear my flesh to pieces, then for my soul to wander through darkness in eternal damnation.

Jet: So what kind of woman is she? What's Julia like?
Faye: Ordinary. The kind of beautiful, dangerous ordinary that you just can't leave alone.
Jet: I see.
Faye: Like an angel from the underworld. Or a devil from Paradise.
--------------------------------------------
1 Karma Chameleon point

Savonarola

From Ayatollah Ali Khamenei twitter account this weekend:



It seems Iran has emerged winner of friends and influencer of people from the negotitaions.
In Italy, for thirty years under the Borgias, they had warfare, terror, murder and bloodshed, but they produced Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci and the Renaissance. In Switzerland, they had brotherly love, they had five hundred years of democracy and peace—and what did that produce? The cuckoo clock

The Brain

Women want me. Men want to be with me.

Barrister

Quote from: The Brain on July 28, 2015, 03:18:00 PM
Why is the president black?

He has lots of melanin in his skin, but that's not important right now.
Posts here are my own private opinions.  I do not speak for my employer.

Valmy

What the hell did we do to justify that? Or does he just regularly call for our deaths as some kind of traditional form of communication? I don't pretend to understand foreign cultures.
Quote"This is a Russian warship. I propose you lay down arms and surrender to avoid bloodshed & unnecessary victims. Otherwise, you'll be bombed."

Zmiinyi defenders: "Russian warship, go fuck yourself."

Razgovory

Quote from: Valmy on July 28, 2015, 03:33:22 PM
What the hell did we do to justify that? Or does he just regularly call for our deaths as some kind of traditional form of communication? I don't pretend to understand foreign cultures.

I think that's how they break the ice there.
I've given it serious thought. I must scorn the ways of my family, and seek a Japanese woman to yield me my progeny. He shall live in the lands of the east, and be well tutored in his sacred trust to weave the best traditions of Japan and the Sacred South together, until such time as he (or, indeed his house, which will periodically require infusion of both Southern and Japanese bloodlines of note) can deliver to the South it's independence, either in this world or in space.  -Lettow April of 2011

Raz is right. -MadImmortalMan March of 2017

derspiess

"If you can play a guitar and harmonica at the same time, like Bob Dylan or Neil Young, you're a genius. But make that extra bit of effort and strap some cymbals to your knees, suddenly people want to get the hell away from you."  --Rich Hall

Admiral Yi

Barry pardoned Jonathon Pollard.  He promised it had nothing to do with the nukalar deal.

Barrister

Quote from: Admiral Yi on July 28, 2015, 04:46:10 PM
Barry pardoned Jonathon Pollard.  He promised it had nothing to do with the nukalar deal.

I was about to be outraged, but a quick google suggests that Pollard is being granted his statutory parole, and has NOT been pardoned.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/29/world/middleeast/jonathan-pollard-spy-for-israel-to-be-released-on-parole-in-november.html?_r=0
Posts here are my own private opinions.  I do not speak for my employer.