News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

The Off Topic Topic

Started by Korea, March 10, 2009, 06:24:26 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

CountDeMoney

Quote from: PRC on February 11, 2014, 11:52:34 PM
The fashion, hairstyles and artwork is way too late 90's / early 2000's to be called an 80's version of Star Wars High.

How so?  You've got your standard issue Michael J. Fox issued uniform right there:  the Back To The Future vest (mine was dark blue, IIRC), your Alex P. Keaton rolled sleeves plus untucked Oxford over a tee with jeans, your feathered yet long in the back 'do, along with the skateboard that says "I'm a skater but not a threat."

The chick is pure Pat Benatar loose tunic with one shoulder exposed and tights, circa 1982, with sash belt and clunky cassette Walkman sold separately.

Don't see what the problem is, what with me being there.

Phillip V

Chuckled at this for some reason.


Josquius

██████
██████
██████

Syt

#36123
Interesting ruling from a German Federal Court.

A father broke off all contact to his son four decades ago. The son tried to stay in touch, but the father refused. As a matter of fact, he disinherited his son.

The father required care and died years ago in an institution. The insurance tried to get the cost of unpaid bills from the son. The Federal Court has now ruled that the son has to pay, even though his father has basically broken off all ties.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein's brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops.
—Stephen Jay Gould

Proud owner of 42 Zoupa Points.

Ideologue

Quote from: Syt on February 12, 2014, 06:05:44 AM
Interesting ruling from a German Federal Court.

A father broke off all contact to his son four decades ago. The son tried to stay in touch, but the father refused. As a matter of fact, he disinherited his son.

The father required care and died years ago in an institution. The insurance tried to get the cost of unpaid bills from the son. The Federal Court has now ruled that the son has to pay, even though his father has basically broken off all ties.

Sure, unfathomable evil is interesting. :(
Kinemalogue
Current reviews: The 'Burbs (9/10); Gremlins 2: The New Batch (9/10); John Wick: Chapter 2 (9/10); A Cure For Wellness (4/10)

garbon

"I've never been quite sure what the point of a eunuch is, if truth be told. It seems to me they're only men with the useful bits cut off."
I drank because I wanted to drown my sorrows, but now the damned things have learned to swim.

Tonitrus


lustindarkness

Grand Duke of Lurkdom

jimmy olsen

It is far better for the truth to tear my flesh to pieces, then for my soul to wander through darkness in eternal damnation.

Jet: So what kind of woman is she? What's Julia like?
Faye: Ordinary. The kind of beautiful, dangerous ordinary that you just can't leave alone.
Jet: I see.
Faye: Like an angel from the underworld. Or a devil from Paradise.
--------------------------------------------
1 Karma Chameleon point

Habbaku

Quote from: Syt on February 12, 2014, 06:05:44 AM
The father required care and died years ago in an institution. The insurance tried to get the cost of unpaid bills from the son. The Federal Court has now ruled that the son has to pay, even though his father has basically broken off all ties.

:wacko:  Since when are debts the responsibility of heirs?  Christ, I agree with Ide on this.
The medievals were only too right in taking nolo episcopari as the best reason a man could give to others for making him a bishop. Give me a king whose chief interest in life is stamps, railways, or race-horses; and who has the power to sack his Vizier (or whatever you care to call him) if he does not like the cut of his trousers.

Government is an abstract noun meaning the art and process of governing and it should be an offence to write it with a capital G or so as to refer to people.

-J. R. R. Tolkien

Syt

Quote from: Habbaku on February 12, 2014, 12:14:04 PM
Quote from: Syt on February 12, 2014, 06:05:44 AM
The father required care and died years ago in an institution. The insurance tried to get the cost of unpaid bills from the son. The Federal Court has now ruled that the son has to pay, even though his father has basically broken off all ties.

:wacko:  Since when are debts the responsibility of heirs?  Christ, I agree with Ide on this.

They are in Germany. When my Dad died he left quite a bit of debt (not least thanks to a failed attempt to build a family house). We all had to reject the inheritance in order to not be liable (except my Mom, she got stuck with the failed loan, because they signed it jointly).

This is not the issue here, though. The father had disinherited his son and he *still* had to pay. I have a gut feeling that unless the case was grossly misrepresented by the papers that this is more a political decision by the judges on the grounds that otherwise you might see a wave of cases where people get disinherited and the state is stuck with bad debt. Which would be scandalous on behalf of the judges.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein's brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops.
—Stephen Jay Gould

Proud owner of 42 Zoupa Points.

Grey Fox

I wonder if I'll have to reject my father's inheritance. He has a lot of debt. Kinda sad, I'd like to have his book & car collection.
Colonel Caliga is Awesome.

Barrister

Quote from: Grey Fox on February 12, 2014, 12:48:53 PM
I wonder if I'll have to reject my father's inheritance. He has a lot of debt. Kinda sad, I'd like to have his book & car collection.

You aren't liable for your father's debts, but his estate is.  You (and any siblings) get whatever is left over after his estate pays off those debts.  If his debts are worth more than everything he owns, including his book and car collection, then you get nothing.

Unless it's extremely valuable, I doubt anyone will care about a bunch of books.  Cars might be a different story.
Posts here are my own private opinions.  I do not speak for my employer.

Grey Fox

Oh that's good.

I erased a word in my typo fixing.

Model cars.
Colonel Caliga is Awesome.

Zanza

Quote from: Habbaku on February 12, 2014, 12:14:04 PM
Quote from: Syt on February 12, 2014, 06:05:44 AM
The father required care and died years ago in an institution. The insurance tried to get the cost of unpaid bills from the son. The Federal Court has now ruled that the son has to pay, even though his father has basically broken off all ties.

:wacko:  Since when are debts the responsibility of heirs?  Christ, I agree with Ide on this.
The ruling is not about the estate of the father, but about costs he incurred while still alive. Basically the German social state always expects the family to pay first before it becomes a matter of state. That makes children liable for their parents old-age care. My grandmother had to pay a senior citizens home for her father that she hadn't seen for decades too.