11 dead in French satirical magazine shooting

[Admiral Yi]

So, there was no prior incidents against CH for their garbage?

Plenty of prior incidents.  Plenty of convenience store robberies.

[11B4V]

So, there was no prior incidents against CH for their garbage?

Plenty of prior incidents.  Plenty of convenience store robberies.

You have not answered how the convenience store is inflammatory. You continue to dodge.

[Razgovory]

I disagree that these guys are culpable for the shooting in any legal or morale way.  I will accept that offensive behavior has some consequences though I think it can only be limited to "protest behavior",  such as the aforementioned defecation in a postal repository.  I had suggested a punch in the nose, but I retract that.  I think should only be acceptable when some jerk gets in your face and starts insulting you.  For instance if someone were to come up to garbon, calling him a fag and making monkey sounds, I think the law could look the other way if he garbon kicked this guys ass.  If this guy just published a magazine that was racist and homophobic I don't think garbon could go over and kick the editors ass.

[11B4V]

I disagree that these guys are culpable for the shooting in any legal or morale way.  I will accept that offensive behavior has some consequences though I think it can only be limited to "protest behavior",  such as the aforementioned defecation in a postal repository.  I had suggested a punch in the nose, but I retract that.  I think should only be acceptable when some jerk gets in your face and starts insulting you.  For instance if someone were to come up to garbon, calling him a fag and making monkey sounds, I think the law could look the other way if he garbon kicked this guys ass.  If this guy just published a magazine that was racist and homophobic I don't think garbon could go over and kick the editors ass.

Of course he should not. He could and my money would be on him.

[Liep]

So, there was no prior incidents against CH for their garbage?

Plenty of prior incidents.  Plenty of convenience store robberies.

You have not answered how the convenience store is inflammatory. You continue to dodge.

Keeping cash stored "inflames" robbers.

[Razgovory]

Yeah, I bet garbon is a scrapper.

[11B4V]

So, there was no prior incidents against CH for their garbage?

Plenty of prior incidents.  Plenty of convenience store robberies.

You have not answered how the convenience store is inflammatory. You continue to dodge.

Keeping cash stored "inflames" robbers.

[Admiral Yi]

You have not answered how the convenience store is inflammatory. You continue to dodge.

No I don't.  This is the first time you've asked.

The convenience store is not inflammatory.  It is a high risk target for armed robbers.  If you operate a convenience store, robbers will find it tempting.  Perhaps you will die.  Perhaps a cop will die performing his duty.  That doesn't make the store owner culpable for those deaths. 

[Liep]

So, there was no prior incidents against CH for their garbage?

Plenty of prior incidents.  Plenty of convenience store robberies.

You have not answered how the convenience store is inflammatory. You continue to dodge.

Keeping cash stored "inflames" robbers.

Yes, that was basically my response to your avatar. :p

[Eddie Teach]

I don't think garbon should go around beating up retarded people.

[Razgovory]

I don't think garbon should go around beating up retarded people.

Oh, I don't know.  I think he might enjoy it.

[11B4V]

You have not answered how the convenience store is inflammatory. You continue to dodge.

No I don't.  This is the first time you've asked.

Christ almighty Yi Post #1260

The convenience store is not inflammatory. 

Of course it's not, hence you're attempt to tie it in to CH is stupid.

[crazy canuck]

If you can't accept that there is a link between what was published and the attack then I am not sure what can be done to remove that logical block.

Of course  there's a link. But even if it was a stupid decision to publish the cartoons in light of the known risk, that doesn't make CH morally culpable for the murders, and it certainly shouldn't make the magazine liable to other victims of the attacks for civil damages.

I agree.  And that is a very good counter argument to the claim made by B4.  My simple point was ignoring the link, whether one admires the decision to publish or not is a bit daft.  Indeed asserting there is no link devalues the heroic quality of the act because if they were not aware of the danger they were putting themselves in by publishing then there can be no heroism. 

[Admiral Yi]

Christ almighty Yi Post #1260

Woops.  My bad.

Of course it's not, hence you're attempt to tie it in to CH is stupid.

Maybe not much point in continuing if you're not even going to respond to my posts.

[Razgovory]

Hey, this thread got stupid and this time it wasn't my fault!