News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

Scottish Independence

Started by Sheilbh, September 05, 2014, 04:20:20 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

How will Scotland vote on independence?

Yes (I'd also vote yes)
16 (24.2%)
Yes (I'd vote no)
8 (12.1%)
No (I'd vote yes)
4 (6.1%)
No (I'd also vote no)
38 (57.6%)

Total Members Voted: 64

Josquius

Quote from: Sheilbh on September 20, 2014, 11:37:36 AM
I don't underestimate but I think devolution works better if it runs with identities people have not artificial ones drawn up by bureaucrats - we're not France :P

England is such an identity, so are the councils. I don't think these regions have any reality for people - I mean look at the map you posted and the partition of Wiltshire :P
I couldn't tell you which county on the map is Wiltshire. :p
That was just a loose sketch by me, not the way things definitely and absolutely should be. I'd hope that communities would be given a choice of which side of the boundaries they would prefer to be in- for instance my guess of parts of North Yorkshire being more sensible grouped in with their local city, Middlesbrough, than the far away York, but maybe their Yorkshire identity holds more sway over the 'sensible' choice of being in the same Land as their local city.


QuoteNot really. The only general elections that were swung by Scotland were in 64, 74 and 2010. You'd get the same sort of swings you normally get in UK elections in England - though other forces may emerge - in a similar way as Scotland will probably swing between Labour and SNP.
My point though is you wouldn't really get the same sort of local issues representation you get in Scotland and Wales. You'd also miss out on the benefits of strong regional groups to fight their side  rather than cities constantly competing with each other and London always coming out on top.
I just don't see an English parliament offering any more feeling of representation than the current UK parliament does.

Quote
I've not seen any support anywhere outside the Labour-think tanks for regional assemblies and I think Labour's current policy offer of massively increased power for the Scottish Parliament and no settlement of the West Lothian one is bold.
Its there. I've seen a few articles about bringing back the council of the north and a few months ago I remember seeing a news story about the founding of a north east party- I looked into going to some of their meetings last month but they were in pretty inaccessible places for car-less me.




I think we need a total overhaul of the way we organise our government in the UK.
I think a three(ish) tier model to replace the current mishmash would be best.
On the lowest level we can have municipalities/boroughs- generally equivalent to parliamentary seats (though in huge and sparsely populated places like the highlands exceptions could be needed). They pretty much replace town councils and that sort of thing, and handle low down local issues. They should also have freedom to merge functions with their neighbours as much as they want, so cities can still be cities, and critically, to try and avoid the current situation of satellite towns and cities having nothing to do with each other. For areas to be able to cooperate with multiple cities would be great too, so towns caught between two cities can have a say in both places of interest.
Second level- regional governments.
Third level- UK government
██████
██████
██████

Sheilbh

Quote from: Tyr on September 21, 2014, 11:06:56 AM
My point though is you wouldn't really get the same sort of local issues representation you get in Scotland and Wales. You'd also miss out on the benefits of strong regional groups to fight their side  rather than cities constantly competing with each other and London always coming out on top.
That's started to change though - see that project by Northern cities, backed by Osborne, to build infrastructure between and within them. I don't see why an English Parliament wouldn't be able to coexist with greater devolution to the cities and the counties.

From what I can see the biggest divide between cities (and boroughs) who are succeeding or look like they might is political willing. I think it's present in London, but also Liverpool, Manchester, Sheffield, Bristol for example while it's lacking in other cities that seem to be stagnating like Hull, Portsmouth or Southampton. That wouldn't change with regional assemblies.

QuoteIts there. I've seen a few articles about bringing back the council of the north and a few months ago I remember seeing a news story about the founding of a north east party- I looked into going to some of their meetings last month but they were in pretty inaccessible places for car-less me.
There's a Wessex regionalist party too. It doesn't necessarily mean a great deal. According to the last 'Future of England' survey down by the British Social Attitudes Survey, regional assemblies were the least popular option with 8%. A third want English MPs to vote on English laws, 20% want an English Parliament, a quarter are fine with things as they are and 15% don't know.

Incidentally the areas with a strongest sense of 'English' identity are in the North: Yorkshire, North-East and North-West.
http://www.ippr.org/assets/media/images/media/files/publication/2013/07/england-two-unions_Jul2013_11003.pdf

I just don't think it's a plausible option and, given the constitutional nightmare of English MPs voting on English laws, I think the only alternative is an English Parliament. It's probably my least favourite, but there you go.

Agree on a total overhaul. I think we need directly elected mayors who are far more accountable than leaders of city councils who are anonymous and often replaced in internal party coups. Far stronger powers for all councils - including full powers over council tax - and ideally I'd make an executive figure electable rather than a council leader with, an often very well paid, council CEO too. The mayors we have also need to have greater responsibility. I'd also abolish PCCs (:bleeding:) and give some power over police forces to the relevant council leaders.

In addition I'd back full income tax powers and welfare, education and health powers to Scotland and, if they want it, Wales and Northern Ireland. But I think that would also necessitate an English Parliament. But given all that I'd probably cut the number of MPs in half too and curtail the number of working peers. With the UK government responsible for pensions, business/trade, foreign policy, defence and the environment and, possibly, some element of fiscal transfers from richer members - England and Scotland - to the poorer two.
Let's bomb Russia!

mongers

I thought this was done and dust, we can all now move on to a United upland of sunlight and flowers?  :bowler:
"We have it in our power to begin the world over again"

Jacob

Quote from: Richard Hakluyt on September 21, 2014, 02:35:34 AM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on September 21, 2014, 01:19:44 AM
A girl can get knocked up from a todger in her fanny? :unsure:

In the UK she can  :bowler:

Either I'm more mid-atlantic than I thought or the phrase "knocking up" has the American slang meaning in the UK too.

I've heard the phrase used in the non-pregnant way by Irish and Scots, but not English.

grumbler

Quote from: Admiral Yi on September 21, 2014, 01:19:44 AM
A girl can get knocked up from a todger in her fanny? :unsure:
:secret:  The British fanny is located in the opposite hemisphere from the American one.
The future is all around us, waiting, in moments of transition, to be born in moments of revelation. No one knows the shape of that future or where it will take us. We know only that it is always born in pain.   -G'Kar

Bayraktar!

Richard Hakluyt

Quote from: Jacob on September 21, 2014, 05:19:39 PM
Quote from: Richard Hakluyt on September 21, 2014, 02:35:34 AM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on September 21, 2014, 01:19:44 AM
A girl can get knocked up from a todger in her fanny? :unsure:

In the UK she can  :bowler:

Either I'm more mid-atlantic than I thought or the phrase "knocking up" has the American slang meaning in the UK too.

I've heard the phrase used in the non-pregnant way by Irish and Scots, but not English.

It might be more prevalent in the (former) industrial north of England where factories with strict time discipline preceded cheap and reliable clocks  :hmm:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knocker-up

I can recall elderly relatives talking about it as a real thing, as in their father had a knocker-upper, but probably haven't used the term myself for 30 years - it may be a (often unknown) historical curiousity for the youth of today.

Viking

Quote from: Admiral Yi on September 21, 2014, 01:19:44 AM
A girl can get knocked up from a todger in her fanny? :unsure:

eh... only if done in the toilet of a trans-atlantic flight from heathrow to jfk and ONLY if consummation happens at the moment the stewardess turns into a flight attendant.
First Maxim - "There are only two amounts, too few and enough."
First Corollary - "You cannot have too many soldiers, only too few supplies."
Second Maxim - "Be willing to exchange a bad idea for a good one."
Second Corollary - "You can only be wrong or agree with me."

A terrorist which starts a slaughter quoting Locke, Burke and Mill has completely missed the point.
The fact remains that the only person or group to applaud the Norway massacre are random Islamists.

grumbler

Quote from: Viking on September 22, 2014, 02:23:35 AM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on September 21, 2014, 01:19:44 AM
A girl can get knocked up from a todger in her fanny? :unsure:

eh... only if done in the toilet of a trans-atlantic flight from heathrow to jfk and ONLY if consummation happens at the moment the stewardess turns into a flight attendant.
or so you hope...
The future is all around us, waiting, in moments of transition, to be born in moments of revelation. No one knows the shape of that future or where it will take us. We know only that it is always born in pain.   -G'Kar

Bayraktar!

Viking

Quote from: grumbler on September 22, 2014, 05:04:52 AM
Quote from: Viking on September 22, 2014, 02:23:35 AM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on September 21, 2014, 01:19:44 AM
A girl can get knocked up from a todger in her fanny? :unsure:

eh... only if done in the toilet of a trans-atlantic flight from heathrow to jfk and ONLY if consummation happens at the moment the stewardess turns into a flight attendant.
or so you hope...

I'm a bit confused, what is the insult here. It feels a bit like me saying it would be nice if my next bowel movement would be enjoyable and you retorting or so you hope. Of course I do. I have a penis. Go troll somebody else.
First Maxim - "There are only two amounts, too few and enough."
First Corollary - "You cannot have too many soldiers, only too few supplies."
Second Maxim - "Be willing to exchange a bad idea for a good one."
Second Corollary - "You can only be wrong or agree with me."

A terrorist which starts a slaughter quoting Locke, Burke and Mill has completely missed the point.
The fact remains that the only person or group to applaud the Norway massacre are random Islamists.

The Minsky Moment

I know of one significant precedent for a "lopsided" federation structure: the State of Prussia in the Weimar Republic had about 2/3 of the population and land.
So, really nothing to worry about.  ;)
The purpose of studying economics is not to acquire a set of ready-made answers to economic questions, but to learn how to avoid being deceived by economists.
--Joan Robinson

garbon

Quote from: The Minsky Moment on September 22, 2014, 01:29:26 PM
I know of one significant precedent for a "lopsided" federation structure: the State of Prussia in the Weimar Republic had about 2/3 of the population and land.
So, really nothing to worry about.  ;)

:hmm:
"I've never been quite sure what the point of a eunuch is, if truth be told. It seems to me they're only men with the useful bits cut off."
I drank because I wanted to drown my sorrows, but now the damned things have learned to swim.

Admiral Yi

What difference did that make?

Would WWII not have started if Prussia-Brandenburg had been chopped into 4 or 5 states?

Zanza

Quote from: The Minsky Moment on September 22, 2014, 01:29:26 PM
I know of one significant precedent for a "lopsided" federation structure: the State of Prussia in the Weimar Republic had about 2/3 of the population and land.
So, really nothing to worry about.  ;)
The existence of Prussia as the biggest federal state was hardly the reason why the Weimar Republic failed though. It was a bastion of the democratic forces in Germany. The "Preußenschlag" was one of the first measures of the Gleichschaltung that happened even before the election of Hitler as chancellor.

Another example of a lopsided federation was the Soviet Union, which was dominated by the Russian SFSR.

derspiess

Quote from: grumbler on September 21, 2014, 05:58:40 PM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on September 21, 2014, 01:19:44 AM
A girl can get knocked up from a todger in her fanny? :unsure:
:secret:  The British fanny is located in the opposite hemisphere from the American one.

One of the more amusing differences between Britspeak and American, for sure.
"If you can play a guitar and harmonica at the same time, like Bob Dylan or Neil Young, you're a genius. But make that extra bit of effort and strap some cymbals to your knees, suddenly people want to get the hell away from you."  --Rich Hall

grumbler

Quote from: Viking on September 22, 2014, 08:14:56 AM
I'm a bit confused, what is the insult here. It feels a bit like me saying it would be nice if my next bowel movement would be enjoyable and you retorting or so you hope. Of course I do. I have a penis. Go troll somebody else.

Maybe you should consider the possibility that some of the rest of us don't post just to insult.  Trolls see insults where none are present.
The future is all around us, waiting, in moments of transition, to be born in moments of revelation. No one knows the shape of that future or where it will take us. We know only that it is always born in pain.   -G'Kar

Bayraktar!