Russo-Ukrainian War 2014-25

[Razgovory]

So many explanations there.

In large part I reckon there's a sense of "what could we do?", thinking it'd be their country against Russia alone whilst the US of course could handle Russia.

Then there's the less forgivable and more selfish let Americans do the dying.

And I guess to an extent there's also a lot who would see it as an American created problem.

I wonder if these are the same people they asked and other methodology qs.

There is one very large and obvious explanation:  They don't care if Russia eats up it's neighbors.

This would line up with no/no. Not somebody should stop them but not us.

Where does it say that?

[Jacob]

So that validates Jake's point.

[garbon]

Wasn't it a telephone interview where the should is asked first?

[Jacob]

About as much as you I would reckon.

Well you have a nice day, then

How rude!

I guess we did have different expectations from the conversation after all then.

[The Minsky Moment]

How much would should a wouldchuck chuck should a wouldchuck should chuck would.

[grumbler]

So that validates Jake's point.

  No, Jake is arguing that "I think comparing "should" to "should" or "would" to "would" would be more illustrative" and I am showing why that's not true.  Read what I wrote again, more carefully this time.

[Sheilbh]

Sorry I was typing when you posted - I was replying to Tyr.

[grumbler]

So that validates Jake's point.

  Read what I wrote once again, this time parsing the words.  You'll see that what I am actually doing there is refuting your point.  A would-would or should-should comparison would not tell us anything interesting.

[grumbler]

Sorry I was typing when you posted - I was replying to Tyr.

[Eddie Teach]

I would expect most people's answers would be contingent on what the US and others were doing. Nobody wants to face Russia alone.

[Admiral Yi]

Would and should are not a mismatch because in democracies a sufficient number of voters thiinking we should do something will translate into doing that thing.

[Tamas]

Well, Russia is ready to defuse tensions with Ukraine if NATO retreats to its 1997 borders:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/dec/17/russia-issues-list-demands-tensions-europe-ukraine-nato

Russia has put forward a highly contentious list of security guarantees it says it wants the west to agree to in order to lower tensions in Europe and defuse the crisis over Ukraine, including many elements that have already been ruled out.

The demands include a ban on Ukraine entering Nato and a limit to the deployment of troops and weapons to Nato's eastern flank, in effect returning Nato forces to where they were stationed in 1997, before an eastward expansion.

The eight-point draft treaty was released by Russia's foreign ministry as its forces massed within striking distance of Ukraine's borders. Moscow said ignoring its interests would lead to a "military response" similar to the Cuban missile crisis of 1962.

A Russian troop location in Yelna on 9 November.
Russia-Ukraine crisis: where are Putin's troops and what are his options?
Read more
Vladimir Putin has demanded that the west provide Russia "legal guarantees" of its security. But the Kremlin's aggressive proposals are likely to be rejected in western capitals as an attempt to formalise a new Russian sphere of influence over eastern Europe.

Advertisement
The demands, spelled out by Moscow in full for the first time, were handed over to the US this week. They include a demand that Nato remove any troops or weapons deployed to countries that entered the alliance after 1997, which would include much of eastern Europe, including Poland, the former Soviet countries of Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia, and the Balkan countries.

Russia has also demanded that Nato rule out further expansion, including the accession of Ukraine into the alliance, and that it does not hold drills without previous agreement from Russia in Ukraine, eastern Europe, in Caucasus countries such as Georgia or in Central Asia.

Those proposals are likely to be viewed extremely negatively by Nato countries, in particular Poland and the Baltic states. They have warned that Russia is attempting to re-establish a sphere of influence in the region and view the document as proof Moscow is seeking to limit their sovereignty.

The Nato head, Jens Stoltenberg, has already ruled out any agreements denying Ukraine the right to enter the military alliance, saying it is up to Ukraine and the 30 Nato countries. There are already major obstacles to Ukraine entering the alliance, including its territorial dispute with Russia over annexed Crimea.

The Russia document also calls for the two countries to pull back any short- or medium-range missile systems out of reach, replacing the previous intermediate-range nuclear forces (INF) treaty that the US left in 2018.

The White House press secretary, Jen Psaki, said the US had seen proposals from Russia to start talks and was speaking with its European allies and partners, Reuters reported.

"There will be no talks on European security without our European allies and partners," Psaki told reporters.

The Russian deputy foreign minister, Sergei Ryabkov, said on Friday that there was no deadline for talks but that Russia wants to begin negotiations "without delays and without stalling".

"We can go any place and any time, even tomorrow," he said in animated remarks.

Asked whether he thought the requests were unreasonable, he said no. "This is not about us giving some kind of ultimatum, there is none. The thing is that the seriousness of our warning should not be underestimated," he said.

Dmitri Trenin, the head of the Carnegie Moscow Center, wrote that Russia's public release of its proposed agreements "may suggest that Moscow [rightly] considers their acceptance by west unlikely".

"This logically means that [Russia] will have to assure its security single-handedly, most probably by mil-tech [military technical] means," he wrote.

Western countries have warned that Russia may be preparing an invasion of Ukraine in January as Russian tanks, artillery and missiles have massed near borders. The Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelenskiy, has called on the west for additional aid in case Russia decides to launch a broader offensive.

On Friday, Ukraine said one of its soldiers was killed during fighting with Russian-backed separatists in the east of the country. He was reportedly killed in an attack using grenade launchers and mortars.

The latest death brings Ukraine's toll in the simmering conflict to 65 since the start of the year, according to an AFP tally based on official figures, compared with 50 in 2020. The conflict in eastern Ukraine has so far left more than 13,000 people dead .

Russia has massed about 100,000 troops on its side of the border. Joe Biden has warned Putin of "sanctions like he's never seen" should his troops attack Ukraine. On Thursday, European Union leaders urged Moscow to halt its military buildup and return to talks led by France and Germany.

[DGuller]

That sounds like a demand designed to be rejected, as a prelude to an action you've already decided on.  This could get really, really ugly. 

[Tamas]

That sounds like a demand designed to be rejected, as a prelude to an action you've already decided on.  This could get really, really ugly. 

Yeah this is the first time I actually find likely there's going to be a proper war there. My wife and I will be touring Poland and Hungary during the holidays, I sincerely hope the Russians will wait until we are GTFO out of there in January.

[The Brain]

Biden's "mother of all sanctions" will have Putin trembling in his bare chest.