News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

Senate GOP seizes control in political coup

Started by Strix, June 08, 2009, 07:18:52 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

DontSayBanana

Quote from: Admiral Yi on June 09, 2009, 04:10:32 PM
UAW workers used to be paid $23/hour + another $17/hour in fringes.  West coast longshoremen make something like 180/year.  Unionized airline pilots make like 200/year.

Yeah. I remember; I was one of the ones who actually posted the breakdowns, at which point we found the difference was in healthcare and retirement costs, and that once we discounted VEBA, there was only a dollar or two discrepancy.
Experience bij!

DGuller

Quote from: DontSayBanana on June 09, 2009, 04:15:42 PM
For those of you saying to let the market set the price, that only works when all the actors are being scrupulous. Where there's a buck to be made, you can't count on anyone to be that virtuous.
So you're saying that free market doesn't work when people are trying to maximize profits?

Admiral Yi

Quote from: DontSayBanana on June 09, 2009, 04:18:25 PM
Yeah. I remember; I was one of the ones who actually posted the breakdowns, at which point we found the difference was in healthcare and retirement costs, and that once we discounted VEBA, there was only a dollar or two discrepancy.
What do you mean by discount VEBA, pretend it doesn't exist?

Plus there's the "job bank."

DontSayBanana

@DG: Not at all. I'm saying that free market doesn't work when an influential actor is unethical, and from the daily laundry list of BS that's been going on on this side of the pond, I don't think it's reasonable to assume all of those influential forces and actors will be ethical.

@Yi: VEBA is employee-contribution and voluntary. The CBA basically covers the employee's contribution, but considering the ones with higher earnings are more likely to buy in, I think it's reasonable to assume that it washes out when it comes to the take-home pay.
Experience bij!

Admiral Yi

Quote from: DontSayBanana on June 09, 2009, 04:34:47 PM
@Yi: VEBA is employee-contribution and voluntary. The CBA basically covers the employee's contribution, but considering the ones with higher earnings are more likely to buy in, I think it's reasonable to assume that it washes out when it comes to the take-home pay.
You've lost me.  I thought VEBA was the pension plan.  No?  What's CBA?

garbon

Quote from: DontSayBanana on June 09, 2009, 04:15:42 PM
Nothing to do with the availability. They might be in cracker jack boxes, but even assuming it's just from a cheap public four-year, that cracker jack box has cost an average of $6,500. In the case of a private four-year, that box of useless junk costs an average of $25K to someone who graduated in the past year or so.

Okay? :huh:
"I've never been quite sure what the point of a eunuch is, if truth be told. It seems to me they're only men with the useful bits cut off."
I drank because I wanted to drown my sorrows, but now the damned things have learned to swim.

Barrister

Quote from: DontSayBanana on June 09, 2009, 04:15:42 PM
I'm a little leery of letting the market set the value without oversight.

:bleeding:

QuoteThe market is an entity unto itself, but it's the same kind of entity as your average cornfield- the only way it has value is if it is properly watched over and tended.

:bleeding:

QuoteFor those of you saying to let the market set the price, that only works when all the actors are being scrupulous.

:bleeding:

QuoteWhere there's a buck to be made, you can't count on anyone to be that virtuous.

:frusty:
Posts here are my own private opinions.  I do not speak for my employer.

Jaron

Let the invisible hand guide us through these tough times. Down with Keynesian economics!
Winner of THE grumbler point.

MadImmortalMan

Contrary to popular myth, Adam Smith was not anything close to laissez faire.
"Stability is destabilizing." --Hyman Minsky

"Complacency can be a self-denying prophecy."
"We have nothing to fear but lack of fear itself." --Larry Summers

Jaron

Quote from: MadImmortalMan on June 09, 2009, 05:42:09 PM
Contrary to popular myth, Adam Smith was not anything close to laissez faire.

Oh ? On what do you base your statement?
Winner of THE grumbler point.

MadImmortalMan

Quote from: Jaron on June 09, 2009, 05:46:28 PM
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on June 09, 2009, 05:42:09 PM
Contrary to popular myth, Adam Smith was not anything close to laissez faire.

Oh ? On what do you base your statement?


I read books. Ones written by Adam Smith.   :P
"Stability is destabilizing." --Hyman Minsky

"Complacency can be a self-denying prophecy."
"We have nothing to fear but lack of fear itself." --Larry Summers

Jaron

Winner of THE grumbler point.

MadImmortalMan

Quote from: Jaron on June 09, 2009, 05:50:15 PM
Like?

The Theory of Moral Sentiments, for example? It is remarkably unlike what we think of as the selfish core of free-market economics. And written before The Wealth of Nations as I recall. "Laissez Faire" was invented by a small group of kooky Frenchmen. Smith was dismissive of them.
"Stability is destabilizing." --Hyman Minsky

"Complacency can be a self-denying prophecy."
"We have nothing to fear but lack of fear itself." --Larry Summers


Neil

Quote from: Admiral Yi on June 09, 2009, 04:10:32 PM
Unionized airline pilots make like 200/year.
And non-unionized airline pilots make $8k a year and crash their planes in order to escape the agony that is their lives.

The system works.
I do not hate you, nor do I love you, but you are made out of atoms which I can use for something else.