News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

Ukraine's European Revolution?

Started by Sheilbh, December 03, 2013, 07:39:37 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Queequeg

Quote from: Valmy on March 19, 2014, 02:14:20 PM

By the way what is the difference between a Cossack and a Ukrainian?  For some reason I thought they were the same thing.
A lot of Ukrainians are Cossacks and most would have some Cossack blood in them, but Ukrainian includes Halychians and Volhynians and Rusyns who were hundreds of miles from the steppes and hills of the Pontic-Caspian steppe that the Cossacks called home.
Quote from: PDH on April 25, 2009, 05:58:55 PM
"Dysthymia?  Did they get some student from the University of Chicago with a hard-on for ancient Bactrian cities to name this?  I feel cheated."

Admiral Yi

I thought Cossacks were escaped serfs, i.e. Russians.

Queequeg

That's what a lot of Ukrainians are.  Kharkiv, Donetsk and the surrounding region had been either Turkic or Iranian for several thousand years before the establishment of the various Cossack sichs. 
Quote from: PDH on April 25, 2009, 05:58:55 PM
"Dysthymia?  Did they get some student from the University of Chicago with a hard-on for ancient Bactrian cities to name this?  I feel cheated."

Valmy

Quote from: Queequeg on March 19, 2014, 02:14:30 PM
United States of Central America broke up and has generally been fine. I think there were a lot worse solutions than the partition of Germany. 

Oh yeah Central America has been awesome ever since.
Quote"This is a Russian warship. I propose you lay down arms and surrender to avoid bloodshed & unnecessary victims. Otherwise, you'll be bombed."

Zmiinyi defenders: "Russian warship, go fuck yourself."

Queequeg

I'm not sure having it politically united and between Colombia and Mexico would have made it a whole lot better.
Quote from: PDH on April 25, 2009, 05:58:55 PM
"Dysthymia?  Did they get some student from the University of Chicago with a hard-on for ancient Bactrian cities to name this?  I feel cheated."

Kleves

Quote
Bowing to the reality of the Russian military occupation of Crimea a day after Russia announced it was annexing the disputed peninsula, the Ukrainian government said on Wednesday that it had drawn up plans to evacuate all of its military personnel and their families and was prepared to relocate as many as 25,000 of them to mainland Ukraine.

Thousands of Ukrainian soldiers and sailors have been trapped on military bases and other installations here for more than two weeks, surrounded by heavily armed Russian military forces and loosely organized local militia.

While the provisional government in Kiev has insisted that Russia's annexation of Crimea is illegal and has appealed to international supporters for help, the evacuation announcement by the head of the national security council, Andriy Parubiy, effectively amounted to a surrender of Crimea, at least from a military standpoint.
My aim, then, was to whip the rebels, to humble their pride, to follow them to their inmost recesses, and make them fear and dread us. Fear is the beginning of wisdom.

Admiral Yi

Smart move Ukraine.  Very grown up.

We're playing a long game here.

Viking

Quote from: Queequeg on March 19, 2014, 02:17:21 PM
Sweden-Norway did okay, and Iceland-Denmark.

Sweden-Norway was a Royal Union without any integrated institutions apart from the diplomatic service, and that wasn't true for the last 20 years of the union.

Denmark-Iceland was a case of one province (iceland) being run like a viceroyalty. Any institutions that iceland had were locally established with royal ascent. Furthermore the separation of Iceland from Denmark started in 1874 and finished in 1944 and was a cooperative process for the most part (except the last bit when denmark was under german occupation.

Both of these cases are mutually agreed separations by governments motivated to see the process happen peacefully and cordially. Thats why scandies all love each other, they did this peacefully and respectfully after having fought like cats and dogs since the first viking chieftains called themselves kings.
First Maxim - "There are only two amounts, too few and enough."
First Corollary - "You cannot have too many soldiers, only too few supplies."
Second Maxim - "Be willing to exchange a bad idea for a good one."
Second Corollary - "You can only be wrong or agree with me."

A terrorist which starts a slaughter quoting Locke, Burke and Mill has completely missed the point.
The fact remains that the only person or group to applaud the Norway massacre are random Islamists.

Valmy

Quote from: Queequeg on March 19, 2014, 02:33:23 PM
I'm not sure having it politically united and between Colombia and Mexico would have made it a whole lot better.

We are talking about a short period of time when what post-Spanish America was going to look like was up in the air.  It was going to be messy regardless of how things went.  I was just amused that was your example of a success story.  'Look at how great things went for Haiti and the Dominican Republic!'
Quote"This is a Russian warship. I propose you lay down arms and surrender to avoid bloodshed & unnecessary victims. Otherwise, you'll be bombed."

Zmiinyi defenders: "Russian warship, go fuck yourself."

DGuller


Valmy

Quote"This is a Russian warship. I propose you lay down arms and surrender to avoid bloodshed & unnecessary victims. Otherwise, you'll be bombed."

Zmiinyi defenders: "Russian warship, go fuck yourself."

Barrister

Quote from: Admiral Yi on March 19, 2014, 02:15:25 PM
Quote from: Barrister on March 19, 2014, 02:11:45 PM
Is there any historical example, ever, where partition of a country was the easy and sensible solution?

The partition of Czechoslovakia didn't solve any pressing problem but it was definitely easy.

Maybe there's the makings of a generalizable principle of international relations in there somewhere.  :hmm:

The partition of Czechoslovakia was comparatively painless, but Czechoslovakia was always seen as the union of two separate groups - the Czechs and the Slovaks, with a clear line of demarcation between the two.

I see others covered the various scandi splits.
Posts here are my own private opinions.  I do not speak for my employer.

The Brain

Quote from: Barrister on March 19, 2014, 02:57:26 PM

I see others covered the various scandi splits.

The most epic of splits?
Women want me. Men want to be with me.

garbon

Quote from: The Brain on March 19, 2014, 02:59:33 PM
Quote from: Barrister on March 19, 2014, 02:57:26 PM

I see others covered the various scandi splits.

The most epic of splits?

You haven't seen me do a split. :perv:
"I've never been quite sure what the point of a eunuch is, if truth be told. It seems to me they're only men with the useful bits cut off."
I drank because I wanted to drown my sorrows, but now the damned things have learned to swim.

Barrister

Quote from: Admiral Yi on March 19, 2014, 02:23:10 PM
I thought Cossacks were escaped serfs, i.e. Russians.

My understanding was that being a cossack was more a way of life than a specific ethnicity or language.
Posts here are my own private opinions.  I do not speak for my employer.