ZERO percent of British muslims believe in tolerance for gays

[Martinus]

You don't have that many Muslims and they are probably scattered. Also they are surely richer and more educated than your average Euro Muslim.

Ah, yes. Ours are special. That's the entire problem.

American Muslims are often highly educated and non theistic, people who left their homelands for political reasons.  European Muslims are more likely to be economic migrants, who moved solely for better jobs and wish to retaint their original culture and are more likely to be highly religious.

I thought the Languish accepted wisdom (tm) has always been the opposite - American Muslims were the entrepreneurial ones and Europe is the one getting the political asylum seekers.

[Martinus]

According to Wiki Sweden has roughly 400,000 Muslims. Sweden's total population is 9 million.

America can wake me up when they have the same percentage.

Why did you guys allow such a state of affairs?

[The Brain]

According to Wiki Sweden has roughly 400,000 Muslims. Sweden's total population is 9 million.

America can wake me up when they have the same percentage.

Why did you guys allow such a state of affairs?

We are not a people who thought that there were still too many Jews in Poland in 1946.

[Martinus]

According to Wiki Sweden has roughly 400,000 Muslims. Sweden's total population is 9 million.

America can wake me up when they have the same percentage.

Why did you guys allow such a state of affairs?

We are not a people who thought that there were still too many Jews in Poland in 1946.

Well then you have noone but yourself to blame.

[Sheilbh]

Two things really surprised me about that and they're not to do with Muslims.  Only 58% of Brits believe homosexuality is morally acceptable is incredible.  I never would have put that figure so low, especially when you consider that we got civil unions and gay adoption with very little anti campaign

Secondly 1% of Brits believe in honour killings? 

[The Brain]

Two things really surprised me about that and they're not to do with Muslims.  Only 58% of Brits believe homosexuality is morally acceptable is incredible.  I never would have put that figure so low, especially when you consider that we got civil unions and gay adoption with very little anti campaign

Secondly 1% of Brits believe in honour killings? 

That's still less than lizard power and sky spirits.

[Grinning_Colossus]

1% of Brits claim that they condone honor killings in an opinion poll, anyway.


The real percentage could be much higher.

[vinraith]

1% of Brits claim that they condone honor killings in an opinion poll, anyway.


The real percentage could be much higher.

Who the fuck are you?

Also, didn't I killl you by burning a rope?

[Admiral Yi]

That's still less than lizard power and sky spirits.

Aren't you supposed to be asleep?

[The Brain]

That's still less than lizard power and sky spirits.

Aren't you supposed to be asleep?

Indeed I am, 12:30 is way too late on a Saturday night.

[Slargos]

In a recent survey it was revealed that 100% of slargoses worldwide believe in tolerance for homo bashing.

Hey!

I'm just reporting the polling results, I can't be held responsible for what the public answers. 

[DontSayBanana]

You are a retard. Most opinion polls that are quoted and used as a basis for political decisions, for example, use the same kind of samples. And even a 5% margin of error (even if we assume that the error is indeed as big as the entire margin and IN FAVOUR of acceptance of homosexuality) does not invalidate my claims.

Seriously, why don't you ban yourself.

Polls below a sample size of 10,000 have a high potential for inaccuracy. That margin for error means there's a 95% probability the number will be within 5% when applied to another sample group of the same size. To inflate the number to the magic 10,000, that margin for error would apply to 9,500 of the sample size. Of that 9,500, 475 of them could swing under the margin for error. 975 unreliable polls per 10,000 is just not accurate.

[Slargos]

You are a retard. Most opinion polls that are quoted and used as a basis for political decisions, for example, use the same kind of samples. And even a 5% margin of error (even if we assume that the error is indeed as big as the entire margin and IN FAVOUR of acceptance of homosexuality) does not invalidate my claims.

Seriously, why don't you ban yourself.

Polls below a sample size of 10,000 have a high potential for inaccuracy. That margin for error means there's a 95% probability the number will be within 5% when applied to another sample group of the same size. To inflate the number to the magic 10,000, that margin for error would apply to 9,500 of the sample size. Of that 9,500, 475 of them could swing under the margin for error. 975 unreliable polls per 10,000 is just not accurate.

I don't think I've ever seen a poll quote anything above ~1100 in size.

[DontSayBanana]

I don't think I've ever seen a poll quote anything above ~1100 in size.

Major academic research entities usually have access to much larger samples, take more time, and have more reliable results. Incidentally, Wikifail claims pollsters go for 500-1,000 participants as a tradeoff between accuracy and expediency, but 1,000-2,000, with most falling between 1,000 and 1,500 is what I usually run across.

[Slargos]

I don't think I've ever seen a poll quote anything above ~1100 in size.

Major academic research entities usually have access to much larger samples, take more time, and have more reliable results. Incidentally, Wikifail claims pollsters go for 500-1,000 participants as a tradeoff between accuracy and expediency, but 1,000-2,000, with most falling between 1,000 and 1,500 is what I usually run across.

Fair enough.

Still, we don't need massively sized polls to learn that muslims are massively sized assholes.

Arabia must be destroyed with all hands. Glassed if possible.