News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

Iran War?

Started by Jacob, February 16, 2025, 02:00:06 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

mongers

Quote from: crazy canuck on Today at 07:23:49 PMwho was going to counter attack the sub off the coast of Sri Lanka?

It gives them enough wriggle room, 'look the Brits didn't stop to help people'.

Which I kinda misses the point about the Belgrano being with 100-150 miles of the Falklands and in a conflict zone vs this ship, which might have been what more than 1000 miles away from US navy surface ships??
"We have it in our power to begin the world over again"

viper37

Quote from: Neil on Today at 06:27:30 PM
Quote from: OttoVonBismarck on Today at 01:35:23 PMSomething that I think may rise to being criminal are reports that after we sunk Iran's ship that was leaving India, we made no effort to save the surviving sailors. My understanding is we are signatory to the 1949 convention that requires us to at least attempt to render aid in such circumstances (and while I think there are some exceptions, I don't believe any apply to that situation.)
There's an exemption for ship safety.  A submarine in wartime being so vulnerable to counterattack is typically the argument used.  Like when the British sank Belgrano in the Falklands. 
https://www.military.com/daily-news/investigations-and-features/2026/03/05/iranian-ship-was-leaving-indian-naval-exercise-when-sunk-raising-concerns-new-delhi.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ships_present_at_International_Fleet_Review_2026
See USS Pinckney.

The US Navy attacked a defenseless ship.  This is what Hegseth boasted about.
I don't do meditation.  I drink alcohol to relax, like normal people.

If Microsoft Excel decided to stop working overnight, the world would practically end.

Neil

Quote from: viper37 on Today at 08:18:05 PM
Quote from: Neil on Today at 06:27:30 PM
Quote from: OttoVonBismarck on Today at 01:35:23 PMSomething that I think may rise to being criminal are reports that after we sunk Iran's ship that was leaving India, we made no effort to save the surviving sailors. My understanding is we are signatory to the 1949 convention that requires us to at least attempt to render aid in such circumstances (and while I think there are some exceptions, I don't believe any apply to that situation.)
There's an exemption for ship safety.  A submarine in wartime being so vulnerable to counterattack is typically the argument used.  Like when the British sank Belgrano in the Falklands. 
https://www.military.com/daily-news/investigations-and-features/2026/03/05/iranian-ship-was-leaving-indian-naval-exercise-when-sunk-raising-concerns-new-delhi.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ships_present_at_International_Fleet_Review_2026
See USS Pinckney.

The US Navy attacked a defenseless ship.  This is what Hegseth boasted about.
Attacking defenceless ships is what submarines are for.  That's the entire point of them.  It's predatory warfare.
I do not hate you, nor do I love you, but you are made out of atoms which I can use for something else.

Neil

Quote from: crazy canuck on Today at 07:23:49 PMwho was going to counter attack the sub off the coast of Sri Lanka?
Presumably any other Iranian ship or aircraft.  It's pretty paper thin, but it's enough. 
I do not hate you, nor do I love you, but you are made out of atoms which I can use for something else.

Razgovory

Quote from: Zanza on Today at 05:58:55 PM
Quote from: Richard Hakluyt on Today at 02:17:32 PMRight now a large proportion of Iran's population support the attacks by the USA...
Is that really so? Honest question. Obviously there are Iranians that support it, but "a large proportion"?
Probably not that big a portion.  It's weird juxtaposition.  The urban leftists of Iran support the American regime while the urban left in America support the Iranian regime.  Conservatives in both countries support their regime.
I've given it serious thought. I must scorn the ways of my family, and seek a Japanese woman to yield me my progeny. He shall live in the lands of the east, and be well tutored in his sacred trust to weave the best traditions of Japan and the Sacred South together, until such time as he (or, indeed his house, which will periodically require infusion of both Southern and Japanese bloodlines of note) can deliver to the South it's independence, either in this world or in space.  -Lettow April of 2011

Raz is right. -MadImmortalMan March of 2017

The Minsky Moment

I'm seeing reports the US has used more than 800 Patriot missile interceptors in the war. Any verification on this?
We have, accordingly, always had plenty of excellent lawyers, though we often had to do without even tolerable administrators, and seen destined to endure the inconvenience of hereafter doing without any constructive statesmen at all.
--Woodrow Wilson