News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

What does a TRUMP presidency look like?

Started by FunkMonk, November 08, 2016, 11:02:57 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Valmy

Don't be friends with us.

But Trump already betrayed the Kurds in his first term. So it wasn't like they wouldn't have seen this coming.
Quote"This is a Russian warship. I propose you lay down arms and surrender to avoid bloodshed & unnecessary victims. Otherwise, you'll be bombed."

Zmiinyi defenders: "Russian warship, go fuck yourself."

Jacob

The Swedish pension fund Alecta has sold off ~$7.5B Euro worth of US Treasuries.

In isolation it's probably not much, but if it's the beginning of a trend then... well, then it's the beginning of a trend.

Actually, I'm curious. There's been talk of Europe collectively dumping US treasuries in one go and that that would be a big knock to the US economy (putting it into a massive recession, inflation, and/ or a depression).

What's the outlook if holders of US treasuries start selling them in a less co-ordinated fashion but still wanting to get rid of them over time? What's the likely impact on the US economy? On the world economy?

The Minsky Moment

#42227
Jacob: the short answer is not much; longer answer is it depends.

There are over 30 trillion in US Treasuries outstanding. Average daily trading volume is around 1 trillion.

So a dump of 7.5 billion is no big deal.  It's not insignificant but the market can absorb it.  Even a bigger dump can be handled and the Fed is available to backstop.

Less than 1/3 of the Treasuries outstanding are in foreign hands.*  Japan is the biggest holder, followed by the UK and the PRC.  Europe ex the UK doesn't have huge holdings, even in the aggregate. Probably less than 2 trillion. Probably a bit over 2 trillion with the UK and inching towards 3 if you add Canada.

A gradual sell off of 2-3 trillion would represent less than 10 percent of total outstanding. Would that be enough to crash the market?  Probably not, ASSUMING other buyers would pick up the slack.  The question would be if a Euro sell off, combined with other factors, would be a triggering factor for a broader market re-evaluation. That is possible but it depends on lots of other considerations.


*US treasuries in "domestic hands" may include US funds and institutions holding the bonds in the US but for the benefit of foreign nationals.
We have, accordingly, always had plenty of excellent lawyers, though we often had to do without even tolerable administrators, and seen destined to endure the inconvenience of hereafter doing without any constructive statesmen at all.
--Woodrow Wilson

Baron von Schtinkenbutt

I read a post on Reddit from someone who claims to be a bond trader speculating that, in the event of a European selloff, the Fed would basically hand out free money to US banks specifically to pick up the slack.  On one hand, that sounds dicey to me.  On the other, a lot of modern finance at that level sounds dicey to me, yet it works somehow.  What do you think on that?

Zanza

You can do that for a while, but it will normally lead to higher inflation, which in turn increases interest on the debt, which in turn means you need to "print" more. If you continue down that road, you end up with hyperinflation.

Jacob

Quote from: The Minsky Moment on January 21, 2026, 03:17:06 PMJacob: the short answer is not much; longer answer is it depends.

There are over 30 trillion in US Treasuries outstanding. Average daily trading volume is around 1 trillion.

So a dump of 7.5 billion is no big deal.  It's not insignificant but the market can absorb it.  Even a bigger dump can be handled and the Fed is available to backstop.

Less than 1/3 of the Treasuries outstanding are in foreign hands.*  Japan is the biggest holder, followed by the UK and the PRC.  Europe ex the UK doesn't have huge holdings, even in the aggregate. Probably less than 2 trillion. Probably a bit over 2 trillion with the UK and inching towards 3 if you add Canada.

A gradual sell off of 2-3 trillion would represent less than 10 percent of total outstanding. Would that be enough to crash the market?  Probably not, ASSUMING other buyers would pick up the slack.  The question would be if a Euro sell off, combined with other factors, would be a triggering factor for a broader market re-evaluation. That is possible but it depends on lots of other considerations.


*US treasuries in "domestic hands" may include US funds and institutions holding the bonds in the US but for the benefit of foreign nationals.

Thanks for the explanation :cheers:

HVC

European powers really need to get their hands on the Epstein files.
Being lazy is bad; unless you still get what you want, then it's called "patience".
Hubris must be punished. Severely.

The Minsky Moment

Quote from: Baron von Schtinkenbutt on January 21, 2026, 03:54:44 PMI read a post on Reddit from someone who claims to be a bond trader speculating that, in the event of a European selloff, the Fed would basically hand out free money to US banks specifically to pick up the slack. 

Free money not exactly, but they could act as the buyer of last resort.  That can work to smooth the market in the event of a quick sell off but only for a time.  If the Treasury market doesn't settle down, then it would be a serious problem for the USA.  As Zanza points out, Fed purchases inject liquidity into the banking system and thus can be inflationary if made on sufficient scale.  The US would become a "normal" high debt nation, having to decide between austerity, default, and inflation.
We have, accordingly, always had plenty of excellent lawyers, though we often had to do without even tolerable administrators, and seen destined to endure the inconvenience of hereafter doing without any constructive statesmen at all.
--Woodrow Wilson

Tonitrus

https://apnews.com/article/ice-arrests-warrants-minneapolis-trump-00d0ab0338e82341fd91b160758aeb2d

QuoteImmigration officers assert sweeping power to enter homes without a judge's warrant, memo says

WASHINGTON (AP) — Federal immigration officers are asserting sweeping power to forcibly enter people's homes without a judge's warrant, according to an internal Immigration and Customs Enforcement memo obtained by The Associated Press, marking a sharp reversal of longstanding guidance meant to respect constitutional limits on government searches.

The memo authorizes ICE officers to use force to enter a residence based solely on a more narrow administrative warrant to arrest someone with a final order of removal, a move that advocates say collides with Fourth Amendment protections and upends years of advice given to immigrant communities.

...

The memo itself has not been widely shared within the agency, according to a whistleblower complaint, but its contents have been used to train new ICE officers who are being deployed into cities and towns to implement the president's immigration crackdown. New ICE hires and those still in training are being told to follow the memo's guidance instead of written training materials that actually contradict the memo, according to the whistleblower disclosure.

...

The memo, signed by the acting director of ICE, Todd Lyons, and dated May 12, 2025, says: "Although the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has not historically relied on administrative warrants alone to arrest aliens subject to final orders of removal in their place of residence, the DHS Office of the General Counsel has recently determined that the U.S. Constitution, the Immigration and Nationality Act, and the immigration regulations do not prohibit relying on administrative warrants for this purpose."

Grey Fox

I don't remember, but I think it was Valmy, that explain if the President wants something and Congress won't stop him, it will happen. Death squads are coming soon.

Getting ready to make IEDs against American Occupation Forces.

"But I didn't vote for him"; they cried.

HVC

Being lazy is bad; unless you still get what you want, then it's called "patience".
Hubris must be punished. Severely.