Couldn't find the previous thread or posts on this we had before, so here:
QuoteJudges say Calif. middle school teacher can't shake porn past, must not return to classroom
By Associated Press, Published: January 15 | Updated: Wednesday, January 16, 4:36 AM
OXNARD, Calif. — A middle-school science teacher fired after students learned she had appeared in pornographic movies had hoped not just to get her job back, but to set a precedent for people looking to escape an embarrassing personal history.
A three-judge commission put a decisive stop to both, saying firmly and unanimously that Stacie Halas should not be in the classroom.
"We were hoping we could show you could overcome your past," Halas lawyer Richard Schwab said Tuesday. "I think she's representative of a lot of people who may have a past that may not involve anything illegal or anything that hurts anybody."
Judge Julie Cabos-Owen said such a past matters in an age when technology makes porn easy to access and hard to bury.
"Although her pornography career has concluded, the ongoing availability of her pornographic materials on the Internet will continue to impede her from being an effective teacher and respected colleague," Cabos-Owen said in the 46-page decision issued Friday by the Commission on Professional Competence.
Halas, 32, was continually deceitful about her nine-month career in porn before she went to work at the school, the judges said.
Schwab said Halas "was being honest and forthright, but was embarrassed and humiliated by her past experience in the adult industry."
Halas was fired in April from her job as a science teacher at Haydock Intermediate School in Oxnard after online videos of her in porn were discovered by students and teachers.
Student claims that the teacher was moonlighting as a porn star were initially dismissed after school officials said they couldn't find any images of her on the Internet — but they were using the school's computers, which don't allow access to porn.
Teachers then showed administrators downloads of Halas' sex videos from their smartphones.
In hearings, former assistant principal Wayne Saddler testified that at the start of a sex video, Halas talked about being a teacher and he felt her effectiveness in the classroom had been compromised.
After rumors of her performance surfaced, profanity was etched on Halas' classroom window, a teacher testified.
Schwab has said Halas did not star in pornographic movies while teaching in any district. He said she took parts only during an eight-month period from 2005 to 2006 because of financial problems after her boyfriend abandoned her.
District superintendent Jeff Chancer applauded the commission's ruling.
Halas' decision to "engage in pornography was incompatible with her responsibilities as a role model for students," Chancer said in a statement.
Man that is pretty horrible.
I guess Rex Ryan will never be able to be a High School coach if this Jets thing doesn't work out now.
Boo-hoo. Should realize that that shit will follow you around the rest of your life before you participate in it.
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 10:46:18 AM
Boo-hoo. Should realize that that shit will follow you around the rest of your life before you participate in it.
But it was a traditional gender role, d.
Quote from: CountDeMoney on January 16, 2013, 10:50:00 AM
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 10:46:18 AM
Boo-hoo. Should realize that that shit will follow you around the rest of your life before you participate in it.
But it was a traditional gender role, d.
Weak.
I'm sorry, but that seems ridiculous.
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 10:46:18 AM
Boo-hoo. Should realize that that shit will follow you around the rest of your life before you participate in it.
Well now everything will follow you around the rest of your life thanks to the internet. You should probably go through life with an alias from about age 14 to 28 just to be safe.
Quote from: merithyn on January 16, 2013, 10:51:14 AM
I'm sorry, but that seems ridiculous.
I entirely agree with you.
Quote from: Valmy on January 16, 2013, 10:51:25 AM
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 10:46:18 AM
Boo-hoo. Should realize that that shit will follow you around the rest of your life before you participate in it.
Well now everything will follow you around the rest of your life thanks to the internet. You should probably go through life with an alias from about age 14 to 28 just to be safe.
Yeah, that or just be mindful of what you do.
Quote"Although her pornography career has concluded, the ongoing availability of her pornographic materials on the Internet will continue to impede her from being an effective teacher and respected colleague," Cabos-Owen said in the 46-page decision issued Friday by the Commission on Professional Competence.
This is entirely out of line for the commission to say that. It's one thing for them to say the school had a right to fire her because they made their decision, but ruling her effectively unable to hold a teaching job because of her legal job she performed in the past is outrageous.
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 10:58:35 AM
Quote from: Valmy on January 16, 2013, 10:51:25 AM
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 10:46:18 AM
Boo-hoo. Should realize that that shit will follow you around the rest of your life before you participate in it.
Well now everything will follow you around the rest of your life thanks to the internet. You should probably go through life with an alias from about age 14 to 28 just to be safe.
Yeah, that or just be mindful of what you do.
A lot of stuff you say on this board would get you fired in a lot of places.
That's pretty idiotic. Not surprised that our resident Taliban member approves of it, though.
Quote from: Martinus on January 16, 2013, 10:59:17 AM
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 10:58:35 AM
Quote from: Valmy on January 16, 2013, 10:51:25 AM
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 10:46:18 AM
Boo-hoo. Should realize that that shit will follow you around the rest of your life before you participate in it.
Well now everything will follow you around the rest of your life thanks to the internet. You should probably go through life with an alias from about age 14 to 28 just to be safe.
Yeah, that or just be mindful of what you do.
A lot of stuff you say on this board would get you fired in a lot of places.
What? And from what places?
This decision is beyond stupid.
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 11:10:25 AM
Quote from: Grey Fox on January 16, 2013, 11:07:22 AM
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 11:01:54 AM
What? And from what places?
Quote from: derspiess on March 11, 2009, 10:04:45 PM
A discrete waterboarding is my solution, then.
:lol: That all you got?
You're in favor of torture! Fired!
You have a lot of posts, I'm not going thru them all.
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 11:01:54 AM
Quote from: Martinus on January 16, 2013, 10:59:17 AM
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 10:58:35 AM
Quote from: Valmy on January 16, 2013, 10:51:25 AM
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 10:46:18 AM
Boo-hoo. Should realize that that shit will follow you around the rest of your life before you participate in it.
Well now everything will follow you around the rest of your life thanks to the internet. You should probably go through life with an alias from about age 14 to 28 just to be safe.
Yeah, that or just be mindful of what you do.
A lot of stuff you say on this board would get you fired in a lot of places.
What? And from what places?
You've made no effort to hide your work for the Bengals. Some employers might worry that you've been tainted by association with the Brown family and failure.
That would have been funnier a couple years back when the Bengals were always worthless. At least now they're adequate, and better than the Steelers.
Quote from: Grey Fox on January 16, 2013, 11:22:56 AM
You're in favor of torture! Fired!
Actually I think I had a conversation at work with some guys and we all favored enhanced interrogation techniques.
QuoteYou have a lot of posts, I'm not going thru them all.
;)
I see gay fox is being his nosy self.
"Teachers then showed administrators downloads of Halas' sex videos from their smartphones."
I'd prefer shits like that to stay away from my kids over a former porn actress.
Quote from: Richard Hakluyt on January 16, 2013, 11:48:04 AM
"Teachers then showed administrators downloads of Halas' sex videos from their smartphones."
I'd prefer shits like that to stay away from my kids over a former porn actress.
:lol: We're a nation of Gladys Kravitzes. Just gotta be all up in everybody else's shit.
Quote from: Martinus on January 16, 2013, 10:58:41 AM
Quote“Although her pornography career has concluded, the ongoing availability of her pornographic materials on the Internet will continue to impede her from being an effective teacher and respected colleague,” Cabos-Owen said in the 46-page decision issued Friday by the Commission on Professional Competence.
This is entirely out of line for the commission to say that. It's one thing for them to say the school had a right to fire her because they made their decision, but ruling her effectively unable to hold a teaching job because of her legal job she performed in the past is outrageous.
I gotta agree with Marti on this one. I think a reasonable argument can be made that the school board was within its rights to fire her, but the court going beyond that and outright ruling that she's unfit to teach? No, that's not a good ruling at all.
Quote from: dps on January 16, 2013, 12:09:17 PM
Quote from: Martinus on January 16, 2013, 10:58:41 AM
Quote"Although her pornography career has concluded, the ongoing availability of her pornographic materials on the Internet will continue to impede her from being an effective teacher and respected colleague," Cabos-Owen said in the 46-page decision issued Friday by the Commission on Professional Competence.
This is entirely out of line for the commission to say that. It's one thing for them to say the school had a right to fire her because they made their decision, but ruling her effectively unable to hold a teaching job because of her legal job she performed in the past is outrageous.
I gotta agree with Marti on this one. I think a reasonable argument can be made that the school board was within its rights to fire her, but the court going beyond that and outright ruling that she's unfit to teach? No, that's not a good ruling at all.
:yes:
Quote from: dps on January 16, 2013, 12:09:17 PM
Quote from: Martinus on January 16, 2013, 10:58:41 AM
Quote“Although her pornography career has concluded, the ongoing availability of her pornographic materials on the Internet will continue to impede her from being an effective teacher and respected colleague,” Cabos-Owen said in the 46-page decision issued Friday by the Commission on Professional Competence.
This is entirely out of line for the commission to say that. It's one thing for them to say the school had a right to fire her because they made their decision, but ruling her effectively unable to hold a teaching job because of her legal job she performed in the past is outrageous.
I gotta agree with Marti on this one. I think a reasonable argument can be made that the school board was within its rights to fire her, but the court going beyond that and outright ruling that she's unfit to teach? No, that's not a good ruling at all.
Her moral authority is compromised, and it would be extremely difficult for her to control a class where everyone is snickering all the time-- sounds like one big continuous classroom distraction. I just don't see her being a very effective teacher with that hanging over her head all the time.
It'd be a different story if she were a college prof (hell I'd bet some programs at certain schools might even require that experience). But in a situation where she's having to teach kids, yeah I'd say she's unfit.
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 12:34:21 PM
Her moral authority is compromised, and it would be extremely difficult for her to control a class where everyone is snickering all the time-- sounds like one big continuous classroom distraction. I just don't see her being a very effective teacher with that hanging over her head all the time.
It'd be a different story if she were a college prof (hell I'd bet some programs at certain schools might even require that experience). But in a situation where she's having to teach kids, yeah I'd say she's unfit.
Well yeah maybe for continuing to teach Middle School but you think like 6 and 7 year olds would be snickering? Kindergartners?
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 12:34:21 PM
It'd be a different story if she were a college prof (hell I'd bet some programs at certain schools might even require that experience).
Weak.
Quote from: Valmy on January 16, 2013, 12:36:23 PM
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 12:34:21 PM
Her moral authority is compromised, and it would be extremely difficult for her to control a class where everyone is snickering all the time-- sounds like one big continuous classroom distraction. I just don't see her being a very effective teacher with that hanging over her head all the time.
It'd be a different story if she were a college prof (hell I'd bet some programs at certain schools might even require that experience). But in a situation where she's having to teach kids, yeah I'd say she's unfit.
Well yeah maybe for continuing to teach Middle School but you think like 6 and 7 year olds would be snickering? Kindergartners?
No. I can imagine quite a few parents throwing a fit, though.
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 12:39:14 PM
No. I can imagine quite a few parents throwing a fit, though.
Oh fine move the goal posts on me.
Quote from: Valmy on January 16, 2013, 12:40:23 PM
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 12:39:14 PM
No. I can imagine quite a few parents throwing a fit, though.
Oh fine move the goal posts on me.
Just figured I'd add that in there.
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 12:44:57 PM
Quote from: Valmy on January 16, 2013, 12:40:23 PM
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 12:39:14 PM
No. I can imagine quite a few parents throwing a fit, though.
Oh fine move the goal posts on me.
Just figured I'd add that in there.
Well point taken. I guess she better prepare for that career in Higher Ed. Maybe Community College.
Quote from: Valmy on January 16, 2013, 12:50:16 PM
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 12:44:57 PM
Quote from: Valmy on January 16, 2013, 12:40:23 PM
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 12:39:14 PM
No. I can imagine quite a few parents throwing a fit, though.
Oh fine move the goal posts on me.
Just figured I'd add that in there.
Well point taken. I guess she better prepare for that career in Higher Ed. Maybe Community College.
Or the obvious.
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 12:52:58 PM
Quote from: Valmy on January 16, 2013, 12:50:16 PM
Well point taken. I guess she better prepare for that career in Higher Ed. Maybe Community College.
Or the obvious.
Back to porn!
Derspiess shows his usual "traditional gender role" colors. That's the only thing she's qualified for.
Quote from: CountDeMoney on January 16, 2013, 12:55:25 PM
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 12:52:58 PM
Quote from: Valmy on January 16, 2013, 12:50:16 PM
Well point taken. I guess she better prepare for that career in Higher Ed. Maybe Community College.
Or the obvious.
Back to porn!
Derspiess shows his usual "traditional gender role" colors. That's the only thing she's qualified for.
From his perspective, that's probably not far from the truth. Once sullied, forever sullied. :sleep:
Quote from: merithyn on January 16, 2013, 12:58:42 PM
From his perspective, that's probably not far from the truth. Once sullied, forever sullied. :sleep:
Not as an ex-porn star, of course, but as a woman. Professional Fuckhole & Baby Maker.
Hey now. He's not Siegebreaker.
Don't think you're getting a pass either, Ed. I'm watching you, you roast beef platter maker, you.
Quote from: merithyn on January 16, 2013, 12:58:42 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on January 16, 2013, 12:55:25 PM
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 12:52:58 PM
Quote from: Valmy on January 16, 2013, 12:50:16 PM
Well point taken. I guess she better prepare for that career in Higher Ed. Maybe Community College.
Or the obvious.
Back to porn!
Derspiess shows his usual "traditional gender role" colors. That's the only thing she's qualified for.
From his perspective, that's probably not far from the truth. Once sullied, forever sullied. :sleep:
:ph34r:
From an objective perspective I think she could still do reasonably well teaching elementary school. On the other hand as a parent I would rather not place my children in the care of an ex-porn actress.
Quote from: CountDeMoney on January 16, 2013, 01:00:23 PM
Quote from: merithyn on January 16, 2013, 12:58:42 PM
From his perspective, that's probably not far from the truth. Once sullied, forever sullied. :sleep:
Not as an ex-porn star, of course, but as a woman. Professional Fuckhole & Baby Maker.
I love and respect women, particularly the more virtuous ones :)
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 01:07:46 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on January 16, 2013, 01:00:23 PM
Quote from: merithyn on January 16, 2013, 12:58:42 PM
From his perspective, that's probably not far from the truth. Once sullied, forever sullied. :sleep:
Not as an ex-porn star, of course, but as a woman. Professional Fuckhole & Baby Maker.
I love and respect women, particularly the more virtuous ones :)
Ok, lettow.
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 01:07:46 PM
I love and respect women, particularly the more virtuous ones :)
How Catholic of you.
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 01:07:46 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on January 16, 2013, 01:00:23 PM
Quote from: merithyn on January 16, 2013, 12:58:42 PM
From his perspective, that's probably not far from the truth. Once sullied, forever sullied. :sleep:
Not as an ex-porn star, of course, but as a woman. Professional Fuckhole & Baby Maker.
I love and respect women, particularly the more virtuous ones :)
To each their own. I particularly love and respect the slutty women, because they were more likely to sleep with me. :)
Quote from: Barrister on January 16, 2013, 01:20:04 PM
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 01:07:46 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on January 16, 2013, 01:00:23 PM
Quote from: merithyn on January 16, 2013, 12:58:42 PM
From his perspective, that's probably not far from the truth. Once sullied, forever sullied. :sleep:
Not as an ex-porn star, of course, but as a woman. Professional Fuckhole & Baby Maker.
I love and respect women, particularly the more virtuous ones :)
To each their own. I particularly love and respect the slutty women, because they were more likely to sleep with me. :)
that's the mother of your children you're talking about!
:P
I agree with most that the ruling went too far.
Quote from: dps on January 16, 2013, 12:09:17 PM
I gotta agree with Marti on this one. I think a reasonable argument can be made that the school board was within its rights to fire her, but the court going beyond that and outright ruling that she's unfit to teach? No, that's not a good ruling at all.
This isn't a court, though, it is an administrative commission. I agree that it is a poor decision, but suspect that it won't survive if there is a legal challenge. I also suspect that this woman could never get a job teaching in California as a result of this series of events; what principal would want to deal with this kind of thing?
Doesn't California have any of those new age-y alternative schools? She'd probably be a shoe in for one of those.
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 12:34:21 PM
Her moral authority is compromised, and it would be extremely difficult for her to control a class where everyone is snickering all the time-- sounds like one big continuous classroom distraction. I just don't see her being a very effective teacher with that hanging over her head all the time.
It'd be a different story if she were a college prof (hell I'd bet some programs at certain schools might even require that experience). But in a situation where she's having to teach kids, yeah I'd say she's unfit.
This would be an issue for about a week, and then the kids would move on. Parents, though are much more self-righteous (see: your post) and, I suspect, would not have the ability to move on.
Quote from: HVC on January 16, 2013, 01:30:26 PM
...She'd probably be a shoe in for one of those.
Unless she feels de-feeted.
America is retarded and California even more so.
Quote from: grumbler on January 16, 2013, 01:31:08 PM
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 12:34:21 PM
Her moral authority is compromised, and it would be extremely difficult for her to control a class where everyone is snickering all the time-- sounds like one big continuous classroom distraction. I just don't see her being a very effective teacher with that hanging over her head all the time.
It'd be a different story if she were a college prof (hell I'd bet some programs at certain schools might even require that experience). But in a situation where she's having to teach kids, yeah I'd say she's unfit.
This would be an issue for about a week, and then the kids would move on. Parents, though are much more self-righteous (see: your post) and, I suspect, would not have the ability to move on.
That's kind of what I was thinking, too. There might be one or two kids who would continue to make an issue of it, but they'd find something else if not that. There are just those kinds of kids. But the adults.... Oy!
Quote from: grumbler on January 16, 2013, 01:33:28 PM
Quote from: HVC on January 16, 2013, 01:30:26 PM
...She'd probably be a shoe in for one of those.
Unless she feels de-feeted.
Don't be a heel, grumbler. The woman deserves a toe-st for all that she's gone through.
Quote from: Valmy on January 16, 2013, 10:30:31 AM
Man that is pretty horrible.
I guess Rex Ryan will never be able to be a High School coach if this Jets thing doesn't work out now.
Did I miss something? :unsure:
Not sure that I want to run a Goggle search on that subject.
Quote from: merithyn on January 16, 2013, 01:46:04 PM
That's kind of what I was thinking, too. There might be one or two kids who would continue to make an issue of it, but they'd find something else if not that. There are just those kinds of kids. But the adults.... Oy!
Right, right. We can trust adolescents to be mature and reasonable in a situation like this, can't we? :lol:
Quote from: grumbler on January 16, 2013, 01:31:08 PM
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 12:34:21 PM
But in a situation where she's having to teach kids, yeah I'd say she's unfit.
This would be an issue for about a week, and then the kids would move on. Parents, though are much more self-righteous (see: your post) and, I suspect, would not have the ability to move on.
Funny how parents would have a problem with an ex-porn star as a teacher for their kid, yet their very same kid has enough porn stashed on his hard drive in their own home to start his own adult website.
But there's you usual parents for you. ITS NEVER MY KID HES A GOOD BOY AN ANGEL ITS OBVIOUS THAT WHORE TEACHER IS OVERSEXUALIZING HIM
I watched some videos of her in action while I was eating breakfast this morning and I have to say I was pretty impressed. I think she made a big mistake switching careers. :(
Quote from: grumbler on January 16, 2013, 01:31:08 PM
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 12:34:21 PM
Her moral authority is compromised, and it would be extremely difficult for her to control a class where everyone is snickering all the time-- sounds like one big continuous classroom distraction. I just don't see her being a very effective teacher with that hanging over her head all the time.
It'd be a different story if she were a college prof (hell I'd bet some programs at certain schools might even require that experience). But in a situation where she's having to teach kids, yeah I'd say she's unfit.
This would be an issue for about a week, and then the kids would move on. Parents, though are much more self-righteous (see: your post) and, I suspect, would not have the ability to move on.
I generally defer to your experience in these matters, but my recollection is that if we, as kids, did get ahold of something that we knew would get under a teacher's skin, we would keep coming back to it time after time...
Derspiess, if you found out your wife did porn in her past would you divorce her?
Also, damn you punners.
Quote from: Caliga on January 16, 2013, 01:51:07 PM
I watched some videos of her in action while I was eating breakfast this morning and I have to say I was pretty impressed. I think she made a big mistake switching careers. :(
A quick google search and I'm not that impressed. She's all right, but by porn standards I dunno.
Quote from: HVC on January 16, 2013, 01:53:28 PM
Derspiess, if you found out your wife did porn in her past would you divorce her?
Also, damn you punners.
Dunno. She'd turn out to be a different person than the one I knew if something like that came up, so I'd consider it.
If my wife did porn in the past, I'd want her to introduce me to some people. :D
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 01:49:16 PM
Quote from: merithyn on January 16, 2013, 01:46:04 PM
That's kind of what I was thinking, too. There might be one or two kids who would continue to make an issue of it, but they'd find something else if not that. There are just those kinds of kids. But the adults.... Oy!
Right, right. We can trust adolescents to be mature and reasonable in a situation like this, can't we? :lol:
It's not that they'll be mature, but they'll be bored. People tend to get used to and desensitized to single person's nudity fairly quickly. You already know what they look like naked, what's new? In a week's time, they'll be searching the Internet for something fresh.
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on January 16, 2013, 01:59:53 PM
If my wife did porn in the past, I'd want her to introduce me to some people. :D
No shit. And she better have kept some copies.
Quote from: CountDeMoney on January 16, 2013, 10:20:36 AM
Couldn't find the previous thread or posts on this we had before, so here:
QuoteHalas was fired in April from her job as a science teacher at Haydock Intermediate School in Oxnard after online videos of her in porn were discovered by students and teachers.
Student claims that the teacher was moonlighting as a porn star were initially dismissed after school officials said they couldn't find any images of her on the Internet — but they were using the school's computers, which don't allow access to porn.
Teachers then showed administrators downloads of Halas' sex videos from their smartphones.
Only for professional reasons of course. Probably all the male staff in that school had fun with their smartphones at home next evening.(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rooshvforum.com%2Fimages%2Fsmilies%2Fnew%2Ftard.gif&hash=28e4ddbe4fc3ce4c012750729d69ec00246c4751)
Not to mention the students. (https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rooshvforum.com%2Fimages%2Fsmilies%2Fnew%2Ftard.gif&hash=28e4ddbe4fc3ce4c012750729d69ec00246c4751)
Quote from: DGuller on January 16, 2013, 02:11:35 PM
It's not that they'll be mature, but they'll be bored. People tend to get used to and desensitized to single person's nudity fairly quickly. You already know what they look like naked, what's new? In a week's time, they'll be searching the Internet for something fresh.
If we were talking about adults I'd agree with you.
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 02:23:46 PM
Quote from: DGuller on January 16, 2013, 02:11:35 PM
It's not that they'll be mature, but they'll be bored. People tend to get used to and desensitized to single person's nudity fairly quickly. You already know what they look like naked, what's new? In a week's time, they'll be searching the Internet for something fresh.
If we were talking about adults I'd agree with you.
Adults don't get bored. They talk about old shit for years and years.
Quote from: Legbiter on January 16, 2013, 02:21:57 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on January 16, 2013, 10:20:36 AM
Couldn't find the previous thread or posts on this we had before, so here:
QuoteHalas was fired in April from her job as a science teacher at Haydock Intermediate School in Oxnard after online videos of her in porn were discovered by students and teachers.
Student claims that the teacher was moonlighting as a porn star were initially dismissed after school officials said they couldn't find any images of her on the Internet — but they were using the school's computers, which don't allow access to porn.
Teachers then showed administrators downloads of Halas' sex videos from their smartphones.
Only for professional reasons of course. Probably all the male staff in that school had fun with their smartphones at home next evening.(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rooshvforum.com%2Fimages%2Fsmilies%2Fnew%2Ftard.gif&hash=28e4ddbe4fc3ce4c012750729d69ec00246c4751)
Not to mention the students. (https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rooshvforum.com%2Fimages%2Fsmilies%2Fnew%2Ftard.gif&hash=28e4ddbe4fc3ce4c012750729d69ec00246c4751)
The part I'm trying to figure out is why the school officials were trying to use school computers with filtered internet access to try to find pictures of her on the internet. Either they didn't think that one through, or they just wanted to say they looked for it & couldn't find anything in hopes that it would just go away.
Quote from: The Brain on January 16, 2013, 02:25:01 PM
Adults don't get bored. They talk about old shit for years and years.
Because we're bored with how things are now :contract:
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 02:26:36 PM
Quote from: Legbiter on January 16, 2013, 02:21:57 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on January 16, 2013, 10:20:36 AM
Couldn't find the previous thread or posts on this we had before, so here:
QuoteHalas was fired in April from her job as a science teacher at Haydock Intermediate School in Oxnard after online videos of her in porn were discovered by students and teachers.
Student claims that the teacher was moonlighting as a porn star were initially dismissed after school officials said they couldn't find any images of her on the Internet — but they were using the school's computers, which don't allow access to porn.
Teachers then showed administrators downloads of Halas' sex videos from their smartphones.
Only for professional reasons of course. Probably all the male staff in that school had fun with their smartphones at home next evening.(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rooshvforum.com%2Fimages%2Fsmilies%2Fnew%2Ftard.gif&hash=28e4ddbe4fc3ce4c012750729d69ec00246c4751)
Not to mention the students. (https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rooshvforum.com%2Fimages%2Fsmilies%2Fnew%2Ftard.gif&hash=28e4ddbe4fc3ce4c012750729d69ec00246c4751)
The part I'm trying to figure out is why the school officials were trying to use school computers with filtered internet access to try to find pictures of her on the internet. Either they didn't think that one through, or they just wanted to say they looked for it & couldn't find anything in hopes that it would just go away.
They are probably educators.
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 02:26:36 PM
The part I'm trying to figure out is why the school officials were trying to use school computers with filtered internet access to try to find pictures of her on the internet. Either they didn't think that one through, or they just wanted to say they looked for it & couldn't find anything in hopes that it would just go away.
Probably tried to do it first without asking the Board of Ed's IT people. A school's regulated internet access isn't managed by the school.
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 02:23:46 PM
Quote from: DGuller on January 16, 2013, 02:11:35 PM
It's not that they'll be mature, but they'll be bored. People tend to get used to and desensitized to single person's nudity fairly quickly. You already know what they look like naked, what's new? In a week's time, they'll be searching the Internet for something fresh.
If we were talking about adults I'd agree with you.
Yeah, boredom with old things is something that you only get to know when you reach adulthood.
Quote from: The Brain on January 16, 2013, 02:25:01 PM
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 02:23:46 PM
Quote from: DGuller on January 16, 2013, 02:11:35 PM
It's not that they'll be mature, but they'll be bored. People tend to get used to and desensitized to single person's nudity fairly quickly. You already know what they look like naked, what's new? In a week's time, they'll be searching the Internet for something fresh.
If we were talking about adults I'd agree with you.
Adults don't get bored. They talk about old shit for years and years.
:hmm:
Quote from: DGuller on January 16, 2013, 02:31:20 PM
Quote from: The Brain on January 16, 2013, 02:25:01 PM
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 02:23:46 PM
Quote from: DGuller on January 16, 2013, 02:11:35 PM
It's not that they'll be mature, but they'll be bored. People tend to get used to and desensitized to single person's nudity fairly quickly. You already know what they look like naked, what's new? In a week's time, they'll be searching the Internet for something fresh.
If we were talking about adults I'd agree with you.
Adults don't get bored. They talk about old shit for years and years.
:hmm:
STFU Blueberry.
Quote from: jimmy olsen on January 16, 2013, 01:48:49 PM
Did I miss something? :unsure:
Not sure that I want to run a Goggle search on that subject.
The foot fetish pornos he was in with his wife.
Quote from: Ed Anger on January 16, 2013, 11:44:14 AM
I see gay fox is being his nosy self.
I am who I am, old man.
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 02:26:36 PM
Quote from: Legbiter on January 16, 2013, 02:21:57 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on January 16, 2013, 10:20:36 AM
Couldn't find the previous thread or posts on this we had before, so here:
QuoteHalas was fired in April from her job as a science teacher at Haydock Intermediate School in Oxnard after online videos of her in porn were discovered by students and teachers.
Student claims that the teacher was moonlighting as a porn star were initially dismissed after school officials said they couldn't find any images of her on the Internet — but they were using the school's computers, which don't allow access to porn.
Teachers then showed administrators downloads of Halas' sex videos from their smartphones.
Only for professional reasons of course. Probably all the male staff in that school had fun with their smartphones at home next evening.(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rooshvforum.com%2Fimages%2Fsmilies%2Fnew%2Ftard.gif&hash=28e4ddbe4fc3ce4c012750729d69ec00246c4751)
Not to mention the students. (https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rooshvforum.com%2Fimages%2Fsmilies%2Fnew%2Ftard.gif&hash=28e4ddbe4fc3ce4c012750729d69ec00246c4751)
The part I'm trying to figure out is why the school officials were trying to use school computers with filtered internet access to try to find pictures of her on the internet. Either they didn't think that one through.....
Yep. I'd bet that's exactly it. Maybe the IT guy was home sick.
Quote from: jimmy olsen on January 16, 2013, 01:48:49 PM
Quote from: Valmy on January 16, 2013, 10:30:31 AM
Man that is pretty horrible.
I guess Rex Ryan will never be able to be a High School coach if this Jets thing doesn't work out now.
Did I miss something? :unsure:
Not sure that I want to run a Goggle search on that subject.
Search for "Rex Ryan feet" and you'll get the gist.
Quote from: merithyn on January 16, 2013, 10:51:14 AM
I'm sorry, but that seems ridiculous.
I agree with you and Valmy. She did nothing illegal, and she was not a pornstar while teaching.
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 12:39:14 PM
No. I can imagine quite a few parents throwing a fit, though.
Many fathers would then have an interest in parent-teacher meetings.
If Mom and Dad's sex movies ever reach the internet, will their kids be taken away?
Quote from: viper37 on January 16, 2013, 03:56:05 PM
She did nothing illegal, and she was not a pornstar while teaching.
What difference does that make? Honest question.
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 04:03:46 PM
Quote from: viper37 on January 16, 2013, 03:56:05 PM
She did nothing illegal, and she was not a pornstar while teaching.
What difference does that make? Honest question.
She didn't do anything wrong, I think, is the point.
Quote from: CountDeMoney on January 16, 2013, 01:04:36 PM
Don't think you're getting a pass either, Ed. I'm watching you, you roast beef platter maker, you.
:lol:
Punishing someone for prior legal protected speech is pretty damn outrageous. Violating someone's right to earn a living because of it is even worse.
Quote from: merithyn on January 16, 2013, 04:22:43 PM
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 04:03:46 PM
Quote from: viper37 on January 16, 2013, 03:56:05 PM
She did nothing illegal, and she was not a pornstar while teaching.
What difference does that make? Honest question.
She didn't do anything wrong, I think, is the point.
To clarify, I was asking about the "while teaching" part.
Quote from: Scipio on January 16, 2013, 04:33:04 PM
Punishing someone for prior legal protected speech is pretty damn outrageous. Violating someone's right to earn a living because of it is even worse.
Take it to the Supreme Court, Scip! :w00t:
:bleeding:
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 04:34:42 PM
To clarify, I was asking about the "while teaching" part.
Personally, I have no issue with her making money - in a legal fashion - however she wants, while teaching or otherwise. However, I can see a school board having more leeway if she made the movies while she was actually teaching for them. Something like a "keep it clean" clause in their contracts or something.
This women needs some help rehabilitating back into society; if necessary I'm willing to volunteer. :rolleyes:
Quote from: mongers on January 16, 2013, 05:39:20 PM
This women needs some help rehabilitating back into society; if necessary I'm willing to volunteer. :rolleyes:
Well you better work on your grammar. I hear she's a stickler for that.
Quote from: Scipio on January 16, 2013, 04:33:04 PM
Punishing someone for prior legal protected speech is pretty damn outrageous. Violating someone's right to earn a living because of it is even worse.
The credited response. You're alright, Scip. Unlike SOME librarytarians, you don't use it to badly cloak authoritarian impulses.
The school districts in Oxnard sure as hell weren't like that when I went through them. :P
Quote from: MadImmortalMan on January 16, 2013, 01:55:38 PM
A quick google search and I'm not that impressed. She's all right, but by porn standards I dunno.
Meaning you just looked at pics or did you actually watch her at work also? What I'm saying is that I thought she was a decent performer. :)
Quote from: Scipio on January 16, 2013, 04:33:04 PM
Punishing someone for prior legal protected speech is pretty damn outrageous. Violating someone's right to earn a living because of it is even worse.
While I agree that she should not have been terminated, I think it would have been pretty tough for her to continue to teach effectively with her students knowing she used to be a porn star. I think she made a bad decision trying to pursue a teaching career. Plenty of other options where it would have been much easier for her to preserve her anonymity.
I forget if I ever brought this theory up on here, or if it was somewhere else, but there must be an awful lot of former pornographic actresses (and actors). I mean, let's assume I've seen 1% of the porn ever made in the U.S. This is unlikely as fuck, but let's go with that. I've seen at least 10,000 individual women. That suggests, taking into account actresses I have seen doing movies I have never seen, perhaps hundreds of thousands or even over a million.
I can't wait for the day when, after downloading Girls Gone Wild: Ohio State Spring Break Vol XXII, Ed sees his girls doing the Michigan back court.
It could happen.
That's cold man.
Then raise 'em right, dammit.
That way, it'll only be the Creighton back court.
Quote from: Ideologue on January 16, 2013, 09:05:20 PM
I forget if I ever brought this theory up on here, or if it was somewhere else, but there must be an awful lot of former pornographic actresses (and actors). I mean, let's assume I've seen 1% of the porn ever made in the U.S. This is unlikely as fuck, but let's go with that. I've seen at least 10,000 individual women. That suggests, taking into account actresses I have seen doing movies I have never seen, perhaps hundreds of thousands or even over a million.
I kinda have a feeling most of the time when people wash out of porn they end up in very menial jobs. It's probably unusual that they manage to get a job that requires a degree like this particular girl did.
However, I remember a case like this happening before someplace near me (either Kentucky or Missouri), and I think she was also fired by the school.
Even worse, the Butler backcourt.
Supposedly Felicia Fox wants to become a nurse back in her hometown of Enon Ohio.
She'll stick out a bit.
Quote from: Caliga on January 16, 2013, 09:11:05 PM
Quote from: Ideologue on January 16, 2013, 09:05:20 PM
I forget if I ever brought this theory up on here, or if it was somewhere else, but there must be an awful lot of former pornographic actresses (and actors). I mean, let's assume I've seen 1% of the porn ever made in the U.S. This is unlikely as fuck, but let's go with that. I've seen at least 10,000 individual women. That suggests, taking into account actresses I have seen doing movies I have never seen, perhaps hundreds of thousands or even over a million.
I kinda have a feeling most of the time when people wash out of porn they end up in very menial jobs.
Well, that's true of a lot of positions. The thing is, most porno jobs (hell, like most law jobs--or, I imagine, nursing jobs or doctor jobs or comic book artist jobs or whatever) aren't really providing you with marketable skills outside of that industry. I don't think it's something you can singularly criticize pornography for.
QuoteIt's probably unusual that they manage to get a job that requires a degree like this particular girl did.
But I thought you said they usually got jobs in menial positions? ZING!
Quote from: Ed Anger on January 16, 2013, 09:13:37 PM
Supposedly Felicia Fox wants to become a nurse back in her hometown of Enon Ohio.
She'll stick out a bit.
I've read that Nikki Rhodes either dropped out of law school, or withdrew before matriculating, to become a pornographic sensation. Smart lady.
(Though I've not been able to get serious confirmation on that, i.e. where she attended or at least which school admitted her.)
Quote from: Ideologue on January 16, 2013, 09:14:31 PM
Well, that's true of a lot of positions. The thing is, most porno jobs (hell, like most law jobs--or, I imagine, nursing jobs or doctor jobs or comic book artist jobs or whatever) aren't really providing you with marketable skills outside of that industry. I don't think it's something you can singularly criticize pornography for.
Yeah, but the difference is that it's kind of hard to do porno for your entire 'career', unlike medicine, law, etc. because it's basically a form of modeling. On the other hand, the big uptick in MILF porn is good for the female stars since it does allow them to keep going for quite a while.
Quote from: Ideologue on January 16, 2013, 09:15:55 PM
I've read that Nikki Rhodes either dropped out of law school, or withdrew before matriculating, to become a pornographic sensation. Smart lady.
(Though I've not been able to get serious confirmation on that, i.e. where she attended or at least which school admitted her.)
I think alot of that stuff is probably BS. Emma Starr claims she used to be an attorney, which I find very hard to believe.... and since usually you don't know their real names, it'd be impossible to verify anyway.
Quote from: Caliga on January 16, 2013, 09:17:32 PM
Quote from: Ideologue on January 16, 2013, 09:14:31 PM
Well, that's true of a lot of positions. The thing is, most porno jobs (hell, like most law jobs--or, I imagine, nursing jobs or doctor jobs or comic book artist jobs or whatever) aren't really providing you with marketable skills outside of that industry. I don't think it's something you can singularly criticize pornography for.
Yeah, but the difference is that it's kind of hard to do porno for your entire 'career', unlike medicine, law, etc. because it's basically a form of modeling. On the other hand, the big uptick in MILF porn is good for the female stars since it does allow them to keep going for quite a while.
I shouldn't have brought it up because it's my personal axe to grind and no one else's, but just to be clear it's very hard to do law your entire career, too.
Anyway, re: MILF porn, indeed. And it's good to have for the culture, too. Compared to other forms of mainstream entertainment, pornography really does do a pretty decent job of depicting all different kinds of women. I mean, how many fat chicks do you see on TV? Even kinda fat? Whereas how many more slightly-to-seriously overweight chicks are in porn? Racially diverse too--blacks, Asians, Indians. Does porn objectify women? Maybe a little, but the nature of the genre is sexual objectification, for men and women, as much as science fiction is about setting up a counter-factual universe or slashers are about gore; that can't really be blamed on it. And, more positively and more importantly, it also gives young men (and young women) a cross-section of what real women in real life look like and doesn't, for the most part, set up unrealistic standards of beauty.
I actually think that mainstream porn objectifies men more than it does women. Think about it: in alot of the gonzo style porn, you literally see nothing more than the guy's weiner.... and usually the women are the big stars in porn, not the men.
She should be allowed to work as a teacher but must wear a large red "A", at all times.
And only an "A".
I think she'd need to wear a P, wouldn't she?
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 10:13:01 PM
I think she'd need to wear a P, wouldn't she?
Most pornography is also adultery.
Quote from: Ed Anger on January 16, 2013, 10:08:56 PM
And only an "A".
I'd have to see what she looked like first.
Quote from: viper37 on January 16, 2013, 03:56:05 PM
Quote from: merithyn on January 16, 2013, 10:51:14 AM
I'm sorry, but that seems ridiculous.
I agree with you and Valmy. She did nothing illegal, and she was not a pornstar while teaching.
There are plenty of things that aren't illegal that will get you fired.
If she does go back to porn, her marketability just went way up.
Quote from: dps on January 16, 2013, 11:11:19 PM
Quote from: viper37 on January 16, 2013, 03:56:05 PM
Quote from: merithyn on January 16, 2013, 10:51:14 AM
I'm sorry, but that seems ridiculous.
I agree with you and Valmy. She did nothing illegal, and she was not a pornstar while teaching.
There are plenty of things that aren't illegal that will get you fired.
If she does go back to porn, her marketability just went way up.
I'm guessing she has a big pay day as long as she doesn't wait too long. Of course it would invalidate her whole stated desire to put her past behind her :lol:
Quote from: Ideologue on January 16, 2013, 09:30:43 PMDoes porn objectify women? Maybe a little, but the nature of the genre is sexual objectification, for men and women, as much as science fiction is about setting up a counter-factual universe or slashers are about gore; that can't really be blamed on it.
It can't be blamed for objectifying women because it is a genre predicated on objectification?
Quote from: Ideologue on January 16, 2013, 09:30:43 PMAnd, more positively and more importantly, it also gives young men (and young women) a cross-section of what real women in real life look like and doesn't, for the most part, set up unrealistic standards of beauty.
Not sure I buy that - but even so, it often gives young people unrealistic expectations of what sex is like and how one goes about procuring it.
Quote from: Ideologue on January 16, 2013, 09:05:20 PM
I forget if I ever brought this theory up on here, or if it was somewhere else, but there must be an awful lot of former pornographic actresses (and actors). I mean, let's assume I've seen 1% of the porn ever made in the U.S. This is unlikely as fuck, but let's go with that. I've seen at least 10,000 individual women. That suggests, taking into account actresses I have seen doing movies I have never seen, perhaps hundreds of thousands or even over a million.
Well, if it's any indicator, gay pornstars end up either on tv, dead from drug overdose/STDs or in prison after they have axed and eaten their boyfriends.
And that's why teachers need a union - to protect them from the moral panic of the intellectually and ethically limited.
Also:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08QH3rVqokw
QuoteAnd, more positively and more importantly, it also gives young men (and young women) a cross-section of what real women in real life look like and doesn't, for the most part, set up unrealistic standards of beauty.
I dunno. Milf stuff seems to set far more unrealistic standards of what to expect of women hovering around the 40 mark than regular porn does for 20ish girls. Most girls are hot around 20. For 40...particularly after kids...its hit and miss.
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 12:52:58 PM
Quote from: Valmy on January 16, 2013, 12:50:16 PM
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 12:44:57 PM
Quote from: Valmy on January 16, 2013, 12:40:23 PM
Quote from: derspiess on January 16, 2013, 12:39:14 PM
No. I can imagine quite a few parents throwing a fit, though.
Oh fine move the goal posts on me.
Just figured I'd add that in there.
Well point taken. I guess she better prepare for that career in Higher Ed. Maybe Community College.
Or the obvious.
TESL?
Quote from: Pitiful Pathos on January 17, 2013, 07:20:11 AM
And that's why teachers need a union - to protect them from the moral panic of the intellectually and ethically limited.
Pretty sure California teachers have a union. What is this one doing for her?
Quote from: derspiess on January 17, 2013, 10:05:03 AM
Quote from: Pitiful Pathos on January 17, 2013, 07:20:11 AM
And that's why teachers need a union - to protect them from the moral panic of the intellectually and ethically limited.
Pretty sure California teachers have a union. What is this one doing for her?
That's my question too.
Quote from: garbon on January 17, 2013, 10:20:47 AM
Quote from: derspiess on January 17, 2013, 10:05:03 AM
Quote from: Pitiful Pathos on January 17, 2013, 07:20:11 AM
And that's why teachers need a union - to protect them from the moral panic of the intellectually and ethically limited.
Pretty sure California teachers have a union. What is this one doing for her?
That's my question too.
It's whacking off to some video on the phone.
Quote from: DGuller on January 17, 2013, 10:34:54 AM
Quote from: garbon on January 17, 2013, 10:20:47 AM
Quote from: derspiess on January 17, 2013, 10:05:03 AM
Quote from: Pitiful Pathos on January 17, 2013, 07:20:11 AM
And that's why teachers need a union - to protect them from the moral panic of the intellectually and ethically limited.
Pretty sure California teachers have a union. What is this one doing for her?
That's my question too.
It's whacking off to some video on the phone.
:lmfao:
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/live-chat-avn-awards-changing-economics-adult-entertainment-151828774--finance.html
Quote from: Caliga on January 16, 2013, 09:35:41 PM
and usually the women are the big stars in porn, not the men.
Don't let your rage consume you. :(
What is wrong with you people! Languish is dying! I scanned the first few pages and NOT ONE "worthless without pics" comment!
Quote from: crazy canuck on January 17, 2013, 01:23:09 PM
What is wrong with you people! Languish is dying! I scanned the first few pages and NOT ONE "worthless without pics" comment!
That's because everybody did it on their own. No prodding necessary. :P
Quote from: CountDeMoney on January 17, 2013, 01:24:36 PM
Quote from: crazy canuck on January 17, 2013, 01:23:09 PM
What is wrong with you people! Languish is dying! I scanned the first few pages and NOT ONE "worthless without pics" comment!
That's because everybody did it on their own. No prodding necessary. :P
:yeahright:
Quote from: crazy canuck on January 17, 2013, 01:23:09 PM
"worthless without pics"
Here ya go.
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fs1.ibtimes.com%2Fsites%2Fwww.ibtimes.com%2Ffiles%2Fstyles%2Farticle_large%2Fpublic%2F2013%2F01%2F16%2Fstacie-halas.jpg&hash=90fc074ee7f5ee73100802b1e0b5dee281e51e52)
And Raz is like, "Mom?"
That's not a very good pic of her. Er, so I'm told.
Here's one that's not so fuzzy.
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmrpopat.com%2Fadmin%2Fupload%2Fwallpaper%2F201210271351340774772403585.jpg&hash=57a073e6009a73d0c4f7e57c2a16ca23b5cc5f66)
Cant see elbows to see if they are too pointy!
I'd say she's pretty hot. Probably not much tread left on the tires, but I admire the lack of silicone.
I'm at work, so I'm kind of afraid to look too deeply for "better" pics. That one is scary enough. :ph34r:
Quote from: CountDeMoney on January 17, 2013, 01:33:19 PM
And Raz is like, "Mom?"
Dude, I'm probably older then this chick.
Quote from: Razgovory on January 17, 2013, 02:56:31 PM
Dude, I'm probably older then this chick.
I was gonna make a Back to the Future joke, but it turns out Lea Thompson is 9 days older than Michael J Fox. :(
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on January 17, 2013, 03:10:44 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on January 17, 2013, 02:56:31 PM
Dude, I'm probably older then this chick.
I was gonna make a Back to the Future joke, but it turns out Lea Thompson is 9 days older than Michael J Fox. :(
Damn, now she was hot back in the day. I think she peaked in "Dennis the Menace"
Quote from: derspiess on January 17, 2013, 02:27:14 PM
Probably not much tread left on the tires, but I admire the lack of silicone.
Is that actually the case? Based on what I've seen, which is nothing at all, her case is a bit questionable. Nothing apparently fake, but there is a bit of "too big and tight to be true".
Quote from: DGuller on January 17, 2013, 03:50:24 PM
Quote from: derspiess on January 17, 2013, 02:27:14 PM
Probably not much tread left on the tires, but I admire the lack of silicone.
Is that actually the case? Based on what I've seen, which is nothing at all, her case is a bit questionable. Nothing apparently fake, but there is a bit of "too big and tight to be true".
Find a pic of her lying on her back (it's not difficult, trust me). They're real.
What name does she go by?
Quote from: Razgovory on January 17, 2013, 04:14:53 PM
What name does she go by?
Don't remember, but that's also not hard to find if you just google her real name. Not gonna help you with that while I'm at work :P
Or you could ask Ide or Cal-- they seem to know a lot of names.
Just google her real name with the word vidoes, warning NSFW!
yuk.
Quote from: Razgovory on January 17, 2013, 04:14:53 PM
What name does she go by?
Tiffany Six IIRC, and yes her tits are real.
Never heard of her.
Quote from: Jaron on January 16, 2013, 08:50:02 PM
The school districts in Oxnard sure as hell weren't like that when I went through them. :P
Heh I just noticed that the OP mentioned she taught in Oxnard.
Jaron: did you tap that ass ese
Quote from: Caliga on January 17, 2013, 06:30:42 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on January 17, 2013, 04:14:53 PM
What name does she go by?
Tiffany Six IIRC, and yes her tits are real.
Still too big for my liking. It isn't just about size, everything should be in proportion.
Quote from: DGuller on January 17, 2013, 06:49:14 PM
Quote from: Caliga on January 17, 2013, 06:30:42 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on January 17, 2013, 04:14:53 PM
What name does she go by?
Tiffany Six IIRC, and yes her tits are real.
Still too big for my liking. It isn't just about size, everything should be in proportion.
DGuller is Tiny Tim :hmm:
Quote from: Ed Anger on January 17, 2013, 05:16:27 PM
yuk.
Took a look at her. She's not really attractive. I'm not talking about internet standards, I'm talking about normal standards. She looks like they coked her up for some of those shots. Maybe she's better looking in person. Ide does bring up a good point though. There are lots of those chicks who do a few scenes and then drop out of the business. I wonder where they all end up. I figure most of them work as strippers, but there isn't a great deal of future in that industry.
Well, she said she did it when she was broke and hard up for cash. One is rarely at their glamorous best at that particular point in life.
Checked out a clip of her. Not bad, but not particularly memorable either.
Quote from: derspiess on January 17, 2013, 04:23:03 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on January 17, 2013, 04:14:53 PM
What name does she go by?
Don't remember, but that's also not hard to find if you just google her real name. Not gonna help you with that while I'm at work :P
Or you could ask Ide or Cal-- they seem to know a lot of names.
Not so many as I know this chick. She's blonde, though, so it's bound to be less likely. P.S.: I think the "not much tread left on the tires" thing is a myth? Unsure. It's likely to be less destructive than pushing out babies, especially in rapid succession. BUT IT'S MORALLY OKAY TO HAVE A BABY SO WE DON'T MAKE FUN OF THAT
Quote from: RazTook a look at her. She's not really attractive. I'm not talking about internet standards, I'm talking about normal standards. She looks like they coked her up for some of those shots. Maybe she's better looking in person. Ide does bring up a good point though. There are lots of those chicks who do a few scenes and then drop out of the business. I wonder where they all end up. I figure most of them work as strippers, but there isn't a great deal of future in that industry.
In the absence of any evidence one way or the other, I'd assume most of them wind up doing normal service industry bullshit, like most of the rest of the country.