A much more interesting set of choices than just purging one of them...
Easy. CC, BB, Malthus.
I'd definitely marry Mal since he's got family money, duh.
I think I'd fuck CC since he's in private practice which means he'd fuck me over eventually anyway.
I don't really want to kill Beeb but he is with the government so down with DA MAN I guess :thumbsdown:
I think Malthus would be fun between the sheets. BB would be a good provider and give the stability you want in a family. CC I don't know enough, so sorry. :(
Also, I think grumbler, Yi, Martinus would have been a more interesting trio to do this with. :P
Quote from: Martinus on May 19, 2015, 02:47:15 PM
Easy. CC, BB, Malthus.
If a gay male insists on having sex with you, is it more straight to insist on being a top, or a bottom... :unsure:
Quote from: Barrister on May 19, 2015, 03:06:33 PM
Quote from: Martinus on May 19, 2015, 02:47:15 PM
Easy. CC, BB, Malthus.
If a gay male insists on having sex with you, is it more straight to insist on being a top, or a bottom... :unsure:
Top - there are and have been many cultures where being a top doesn't even really count as gay.
All three. F+M+K=profit.
Quote from: Barrister on May 19, 2015, 03:06:33 PM
Quote from: Martinus on May 19, 2015, 02:47:15 PM
Easy. CC, BB, Malthus.
If a gay male insists on having sex with you, is it more straight to insist on being a top, or a bottom... :unsure:
Sorry, I don't do anal. :contract:
Quote from: Martinus on May 19, 2015, 03:21:20 PM
Quote from: Barrister on May 19, 2015, 03:06:33 PM
Quote from: Martinus on May 19, 2015, 02:47:15 PM
Easy. CC, BB, Malthus.
If a gay male insists on having sex with you, is it more straight to insist on being a top, or a bottom... :unsure:
Sorry, I don't do anal. :contract:
And I don't do guys. :contract:
If you want to fuck me, there may have to be some compromises made...
Quote from: Richard Hakluyt on May 19, 2015, 03:15:42 PM
Quote from: Barrister on May 19, 2015, 03:06:33 PM
Quote from: Martinus on May 19, 2015, 02:47:15 PM
Easy. CC, BB, Malthus.
If a gay male insists on having sex with you, is it more straight to insist on being a top, or a bottom... :unsure:
Top - there are and have been many cultures where being a top doesn't even really count as gay.
Which doesn't really make much sense when you think about it. After all, to top, you actually have to be well aroused. You could be totally not into it and bottom.
Can you marry and kill the same person? :unsure: Can you kill more than one? :unsure:
Quote from: Syt on May 19, 2015, 03:02:42 PM
Also, I think grumbler, Yi, Martinus would have been a more interesting trio to do this with. :P
:unsure:
This might be in contention for "Worst Languish Thread Ever".
I am totally confused. All I know is that all three are insanely rich Canadian lawyers.
Quote from: Monoriu on May 19, 2015, 08:25:05 PM
I am totally confused. All I know is that all three are insanely rich Canadian lawyers.
I know, that's what makes it so tough to decide on two of the three actions. :(
Ugh, lawyers.
Quote from: Monoriu on May 19, 2015, 08:25:05 PM
I am totally confused. All I know is that all three are insanely rich Canadian lawyers.
I'm a public servant.
You above all other posters should know that means I am anything but "insanely rich". :contract:
Quote from: Barrister on May 19, 2015, 09:50:13 PM
Quote from: Monoriu on May 19, 2015, 08:25:05 PM
I am totally confused. All I know is that all three are insanely rich Canadian lawyers.
I'm a public servant.
You above all other posters should know that means I am anything but "insanely rich". :contract:
I am more than familiar with the HK civil service pay scale. But not the Canadian one :blush:
Mono's not rich. He just jets around the world every month staying in hotels that get rated with stars and eating at world-famous restaurants.
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on May 19, 2015, 09:55:26 PM
Mono's not rich. He just jets around the world every month staying in hotels that get rated with stars and eating at world-famous restaurants.
Most people on languish are better off than me :P I work in the civil service, and I am not a professional like BB.
Besides, you make a good point. I travel too much, and spend too much money. That's why I am not rich and will never be :glare:
Quote from: Monoriu on May 19, 2015, 10:07:56 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on May 19, 2015, 09:55:26 PM
Mono's not rich. He just jets around the world every month staying in hotels that get rated with stars and eating at world-famous restaurants.
Most people on languish are better off than me :P I work in the civil service, and I am not a professional like BB.
Besides, you make a good point. I travel too much, and spend too much money. That's why I am not rich and will never be :glare:
Trust me - the "civil service" part of the equation outweighs the "professional" part. <_<
I have a good income, don't get me wrong, but "insanely rich" is wildly wrong.
Okay, okay, you convinced me. You're definitely not marriage material.
Quote from: Monoriu on May 19, 2015, 10:07:56 PM
Besides, you make a good point. I travel too much, and spend too much money. That's why I am not rich and will never be :glare:
You live well. Anyway, you can't take it with you in your next incarnation. (No, this doesn't mean I think you're Buddhist. ;))
Quote from: Barrister on May 19, 2015, 03:22:39 PM
Quote from: Martinus on May 19, 2015, 03:21:20 PM
Quote from: Barrister on May 19, 2015, 03:06:33 PM
Quote from: Martinus on May 19, 2015, 02:47:15 PM
Easy. CC, BB, Malthus.
If a gay male insists on having sex with you, is it more straight to insist on being a top, or a bottom... :unsure:
Sorry, I don't do anal. :contract:
And I don't do guys. :contract:
If you want to fuck me, there may have to be some compromises made...
:lmfao:
Quote from: garbon on May 19, 2015, 04:23:13 PM
Quote from: Richard Hakluyt on May 19, 2015, 03:15:42 PM
Quote from: Barrister on May 19, 2015, 03:06:33 PM
Quote from: Martinus on May 19, 2015, 02:47:15 PM
Easy. CC, BB, Malthus.
If a gay male insists on having sex with you, is it more straight to insist on being a top, or a bottom... :unsure:
Top - there are and have been many cultures where being a top doesn't even really count as gay.
Which doesn't really make much sense when you think about it. After all, to top, you actually have to be well aroused. You could be totally not into it and bottom.
"Custom is king" as Herodotus wisely remarks, though the most interresting application of that maxim is when we look at our own customs for signs of weirdness and irrationality.
I don't think we have to stick to backwards ways of seeing things. :P
Quote from: garbon on May 19, 2015, 04:23:13 PM
Quote from: Richard Hakluyt on May 19, 2015, 03:15:42 PM
Quote from: Barrister on May 19, 2015, 03:06:33 PM
Quote from: Martinus on May 19, 2015, 02:47:15 PM
Easy. CC, BB, Malthus.
If a gay male insists on having sex with you, is it more straight to insist on being a top, or a bottom... :unsure:
Top - there are and have been many cultures where being a top doesn't even really count as gay.
Which doesn't really make much sense when you think about it. After all, to top, you actually have to be well aroused. You could be totally not into it and bottom.
according to the ancient greeks (and a whole lot of others I assume) it's because the top position is position of power (male) and the bottom the position of submission (female, slave, boy...). And no selfrespecting, free man would ever want to be in such a position was the idea and custom. iirc.
Quote from: Crazy_Ivan80 on May 20, 2015, 05:14:54 AM
Quote from: garbon on May 19, 2015, 04:23:13 PM
Quote from: Richard Hakluyt on May 19, 2015, 03:15:42 PM
Quote from: Barrister on May 19, 2015, 03:06:33 PM
Quote from: Martinus on May 19, 2015, 02:47:15 PM
Easy. CC, BB, Malthus.
If a gay male insists on having sex with you, is it more straight to insist on being a top, or a bottom... :unsure:
Top - there are and have been many cultures where being a top doesn't even really count as gay.
Which doesn't really make much sense when you think about it. After all, to top, you actually have to be well aroused. You could be totally not into it and bottom.
according to the ancient greeks (and a whole lot of others I assume) it's because the top position is position of power (male) and the bottom the position of submission (female, slave, boy...). And no selfrespecting, free man would ever want to be in such a position was the idea and custom. iirc.
Yeah, I get that. Just doesn't seem to make sense with regards to sexual arousal. Can totally see it down as you are "lesser" if bottoming but hard to say isn't most gay to be the one role where an erection is mandatory.
Quote from: garbon on May 20, 2015, 05:39:29 AM
Yeah, I get that. Just doesn't seem to make sense with regards to sexual arousal. Can totally see it down as you are "lesser" if bottoming but hard to say isn't most gay to be the one role where an erection is mandatory.
True but there are two key pieces of ancient culture to consider. First real men are so potent and virile they cannot help but be rock hard all the time. Two identities based on sexual preference are not really a thing.
Which is why the reasoning does not work any more.
Quote from: Martinus on May 20, 2015, 10:51:34 AM
Which is why the reasoning does not work any more.
Some of us believe in traditional values.
Quote from: Valmy on May 20, 2015, 09:34:01 AM
Quote from: garbon on May 20, 2015, 05:39:29 AM
Yeah, I get that. Just doesn't seem to make sense with regards to sexual arousal. Can totally see it down as you are "lesser" if bottoming but hard to say isn't most gay to be the one role where an erection is mandatory.
True but there are two key pieces of ancient culture to consider. First real men are so potent and virile they cannot help but be rock hard all the time. Two identities based on sexual preference are not really a thing.
If you are going to do that, probably doesn't make much sense to talk about gayness then. :contract:
Quote from: garbon on May 20, 2015, 12:56:46 PM
If you are going to do that, probably doesn't make much sense to talk about gayness then. :contract:
True. :hmm:
I think I mistakenly got all serious in what was a silly conversation :blush: