Quote from: Richard Hakluyt on July 07, 2025, 12:37:33 AMThat's fair enough Raz and I agree with you. Annoyingly that also means I agree with JD Vance's criticisms on the state of free speech in the UK.
Quote from: Richard Hakluyt on July 07, 2025, 12:37:33 AMThat's fair enough Raz and I agree with you. Annoyingly that also means I agree with JD Vance's criticisms on the state of free speech in the UK.
Quote from: Solmyr on July 06, 2025, 11:44:25 PMToo big of a construction sector can be a source of runaway expenses, yes, especially if your construction goods are not dirt-cheap yet.
Also, don't incorporate places like Beijing. It doesn't give anything useful and just allows them to vote in your elections. Generally you only need to incorporate your core areas unless you are going really multicultural utopia.
Quote from: Jacob on July 06, 2025, 11:44:39 PMIn a Liberal Western context- LLM cannot be relied upon to not endorse ethnic cleansing or undermining the rule of law and the like.
Quote from: Admiral Yi on July 06, 2025, 07:59:43 PMQuote from: Sheilbh on July 06, 2025, 01:05:14 PMInteresting piece on the FT with a slightly provocative argument (that I think could be right)...QuoteThe White House favours gutting any effective regulation of artificial intelligence, even as more and more experiments confirm that existing large language models are not safely aligned with acceptable political and social norms.
Can you tell me what this means Shelf?
Quote from: Sheilbh on July 06, 2025, 01:05:14 PMInteresting piece on the FT with a slightly provocative argument (that I think could be right)...QuoteThe White House favours gutting any effective regulation of artificial intelligence, even as more and more experiments confirm that existing large language models are not safely aligned with acceptable political and social norms.
Page created in 0.053 seconds with 16 queries.