
QuoteI agree this is clearly not drafted by diplomats or anyone who cares about the details. But it also struck me as the first Russian proposal that looks even close to the area of what a final deal might look like so I don't think this is the deal - but I think it may be start of serious talks on what that is.
Quote from: Josquius on Today at 03:10:10 PMAh you meant focusing on the ad part directly vs focusing on the front end services.
It's breaking up the front end that usually gets the attention but it is the back end that is absolutely the problem.
It is heavily reliant on the front end however so say forcing Google to sell youtube for example would damage the actual ad monopoly.
HVCs figures sound like what I've seen for what Google actually owns.
The actual ads on Google, on the space that it owns directly, is only a small part of its operations and alone wouldn't be an issue.
Quote from: Admiral Yi on Today at 02:41:21 PMSeven posts up, fourth line down, fifth word.Ah you meant focusing on the ad part directly vs focusing on the front end services.
If you've been clear what the issue is, the answers to my questions should be simple.
Google is the owner of a small fraction of the billboards in the world, owns a small fraction of the printing machines, and employs a small fraction of the guys who put the posters up.
Googled it and turns out the own 29.7% of the *digital* ad market, which is not the total ad market.
Quote from: Razgovory on Today at 01:57:40 PMQuote from: Valmy on Today at 12:57:56 PMThey aren't our allies. They voted for Trump last time. Friendship over.Lot of people disagree. Especially in Europe. I can't get help but think that J.K. Rowling would get a pass if she wore a hijab.
Page created in 0.018 seconds with 11 queries.