News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

NCAA football, 2013-14

Started by grumbler, March 21, 2013, 07:27:00 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

MadBurgerMaker

#390
Quote from: Berkut on September 15, 2013, 01:14:50 AM
Why are you being such a douchebag?

Fuck you, jerkoff.

QuoteI never said Arizona was awesome, I said they easily handled UTSA. Unless UTSA has some amazing offense, that doesn't make Arizona awesome.

The talking heads who are paid to blab were wrong. That is ok - they often are. Not agreeing with them doesn't make me delusional. They are paid to blab, and they have to say something, and in this case what they said was simply bullshit. As I've shown with actual stats and figures and such.

Why this is worthy of you getting your feelings all hurt about I do not know. It's not like anyone expected UTSA to go to Arizona and have a real shot. The game went pretty much as expected, right?

How about you tell me how there was no way it could have been 23-14 at the half like they were talking about.  That's all they were saying, and all I was really talking about just as an aside about the local team doing better than expected, and what you felt the need to start babbling about because ERMAGERD WRONG, you enormous tool.

MadBurgerMaker

#391
Quote from: BerkutArizona will win, in which case I will be happy.

Or Arizona will lose, in which case I won't be happy.

Either way, the guys paid to blab will blab, and likely say something that isn't really accurate, and I will disagree with them. Whether or not you get all butt hurt because someone disagrees with what a couple third rate announcers say or not we likely won't know, since it won't be a UTSA game, I suppose.

I dunno, someone might say something WRONG and you'll stroke out and be a bitch again.

Do you think I'm some sort of UTSA superfan?  Are you stupid?

Eddie Teach

Quote from: Berkut on September 15, 2013, 01:00:39 AM
50 yards is quite a lot though for a half.

That's much closer than it should be.
To sleep, perchance to dream. But in that sleep of death, what dreams may come?

Berkut

Quote from: Peter Wiggin on September 15, 2013, 01:25:02 AM
Quote from: Berkut on September 15, 2013, 01:00:39 AM
50 yards is quite a lot though for a half.

That's much closer than it should be.

Not really.

Arizona scored TDs on 3 of their 6 posessions. When you score a TD, you cannot get any more yards on that drive.

The only thing surprising was that opening UTSA drive, which was rather nice...but still did not get them into the endzone.

Otherwise, Arizona scored pretty much at will, and stopped UTSA everytime they had the ball.

I never felt like the game was even remotely in doubt after the first exchange of series. It was clear UTSA was outmatched.
"If you think this has a happy ending, then you haven't been paying attention."

select * from users where clue > 0
0 rows returned

MadBurgerMaker

#394
ANYWAYYYYS

Quote from: Berkut on September 15, 2013, 01:31:56 AM
It was clear UTSA was outmatched.

They were horribly outmatched.  I don't know a whole lot about C-USA this year, but I wouldn't be surprised if they were outmatched in every game this year.  They had to come from behind vs New Mexico of all teams.  I mean, I know they have Bob Davie out there now and all (heh), but I don't think New Mexico is all that good.  Then again...well shit they did win, and there's nothing wrong with that.

E: Bob Davie is 5-11 at New Mexico.  That's actually not that bad, considering that's more wins than they had in the previous like...5 years combined or something.

Berkut

Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on September 15, 2013, 01:20:45 AM
Quote from: BerkutArizona will win, in which case I will be happy.

Or Arizona will lose, in which case I won't be happy.

Either way, the guys paid to blab will blab, and likely say something that isn't really accurate, and I will disagree with them. Whether or not you get all butt hurt because someone disagrees with what a couple third rate announcers say or not we likely won't know, since it won't be a UTSA game, I suppose.

I dunno, someone might say something WRONG and you'll stroke out and be a bitch again.

If someone says something wrong, and I mention it, will you start cussing and screaming and going on and on and on and on about it?

The announcers were wrong. YOU were wrong. If me using actual stats to show that, rather than just ranting and raving like you are doing makes me "a bitch" I suppose I can live with that. I've been called worse by opther super tough internet dudes.
Quote
Do you think I'm some sort of UTSA superfan?  Are you stupid?

I have no idea. You sure seem to be getting really upset that I disagreed with your claim that "Arizona didn't dominate on D" and "UTSA was moving the ball just about as well as Arizona", both of which are rather clearly simply not true.

Is there some other reason you are so emotionally caught up in the comments that you are willing to act so unpleasant over them?
"If you think this has a happy ending, then you haven't been paying attention."

select * from users where clue > 0
0 rows returned

MadBurgerMaker

#396
Quote from: Berkut on September 15, 2013, 01:35:20 AM
If someone says something wrong, and I mention it, will you start cussing and screaming and going on and on and on and on about it?

I don't know.  Will it involve you calling me a douchebag?

QuoteThe announcers were wrong. YOU were wrong. If me using actual stats to show that, rather than just ranting and raving like you are doing makes me "a bitch" I suppose I can live with that. I've been called worse by opther super tough internet dudes.

You acting like a bitch makes you a bitch.  I don't know about super tough internet dudes or whatever, just that you're being a bitch.  Sorry, guy.  Sucks to be you, I guess.

QuoteI have no idea. You sure seem to be getting really upset that I disagreed with your claim that "Arizona didn't dominate on D" and "UTSA was moving the ball just about as well as Arizona", both of which are rather clearly simply not true.

Is there some other reason you are so emotionally caught up in the comments that you are willing to act so unpleasant over them?

Yeah, maybe next time don't be calling people douchebags and/or acting like a prick about a throwaway post.  OR, and this is just an idea, you could just go fuck yourself.  How's that?  Want to talk more about it, or do you want to move on?  Because I can keep pointing out that you're a bitch and telling you to go fuck yourself for....well I can keep that up for a while.

E:  And yeah, they were right, and you're dead-ass wrong.  It was a lot closer than it should have been, and could have been even closer.  Fuck you and fuck Arizona.  :)

Berkut

Well, you certainly have proven that you can in fact go on and on acting like a douchebag. Congrats on that at least.
"If you think this has a happy ending, then you haven't been paying attention."

select * from users where clue > 0
0 rows returned

MadBurgerMaker


Eddie Teach

Quote from: Berkut on September 15, 2013, 01:31:56 AM
Not really.

Arizona scored TDs on 3 of their 6 posessions. When you score a TD, you cannot get any more yards on that drive.

The only thing surprising was that opening UTSA drive, which was rather nice...but still did not get them into the endzone.

Otherwise, Arizona scored pretty much at will, and stopped UTSA everytime they had the ball.

I never felt like the game was even remotely in doubt after the first exchange of series. It was clear UTSA was outmatched.

Of course it wasn't in doubt. Of course UTSA was outmatched. That's why a UTSA fan can look at the silver lining that they allowed 3 touchdowns instead of 5 or 6.
To sleep, perchance to dream. But in that sleep of death, what dreams may come?

MadBurgerMaker

#400
So Wisconsin got hosed?  I'm starting to see some angry posts in various places.

Something about a player giving himself up, but Arizona State players jumping on the ball and not moving while time ran out or some such?

E: And something about Arizona State players trying to call a time out with Wisconsin in FG range?  What the hell was going on in that game?

E2: Here it is: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-ELRub8n7s

Whistle blows, ASU dudes jump all over the ball, ref takes all remaining time to set the ball.  Seems like.....seems like it shouldn't have taken 14 seconds for them to get the ball spotted, and those ASU players shouldn't be able to jump on the ball and delay things like that.  Delay of game?

katmai

Quote from: Berkut on September 15, 2013, 12:09:28 AM
Quote from: katmai on September 14, 2013, 11:39:26 PM
The only important Pac-12 teams already won today (Oregon and Washington :P )

Dude, you cannot be a fan of them both. That isn't right.
i hate the ducks, just was trolling you.
Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son

Berkut

Quote from: katmai on September 15, 2013, 02:08:06 AM
Quote from: Berkut on September 15, 2013, 12:09:28 AM
Quote from: katmai on September 14, 2013, 11:39:26 PM
The only important Pac-12 teams already won today (Oregon and Washington :P )

Dude, you cannot be a fan of them both. That isn't right.
i hate the ducks, just was trolling you.

OK, fair enough. You caught me.

Fucking Oregon. At least they bitch slapped a SEC team.
"If you think this has a happy ending, then you haven't been paying attention."

select * from users where clue > 0
0 rows returned

Berkut

Quote from: Peter Wiggin on September 15, 2013, 01:57:32 AM
Quote from: Berkut on September 15, 2013, 01:31:56 AM
Not really.

Arizona scored TDs on 3 of their 6 posessions. When you score a TD, you cannot get any more yards on that drive.

The only thing surprising was that opening UTSA drive, which was rather nice...but still did not get them into the endzone.

Otherwise, Arizona scored pretty much at will, and stopped UTSA everytime they had the ball.

I never felt like the game was even remotely in doubt after the first exchange of series. It was clear UTSA was outmatched.

Of course it wasn't in doubt. Of course UTSA was outmatched. That's why a UTSA fan can look at the silver lining that they allowed 3 touchdowns instead of 5 or 6.

OK. I thought the UTSA run defense looked pretty good. They had some good interior linemen.

Their pass defense, not so much.
"If you think this has a happy ending, then you haven't been paying attention."

select * from users where clue > 0
0 rows returned

MadBurgerMaker

Quote from: Berkut on September 15, 2013, 02:16:52 AM
OK. I thought the UTSA run defense looked pretty good. They had some good interior linemen.

Their pass defense, not so much.

Their DBs suuuuuck (I think they're just small and slow. "just"). 

The team as a whole seems a bit undersized too.  I don't follow them except to check in on games and such, but they have a lot of little dudes running around out there, it seems like.  They were talking about their 165lb safety during this game, IIRC.  That's crazy.