Terminator 4 sucks

[jimmy olsen]

The Providence Journal gave it 4 stars and I usually agree with him!

it must be nice not to have to think and to rely on others for every single opinion.

anyhow, your treasured RT only gives T4 34%

You don't what you're talking about. Our tastes merely coincide most of the time. So if I know he liked a movie there's a good chance I'll like a movie.

Anyways I often don't agree with the majority of the critics so that doesn't bother me. I only reference them when they back me up.

[saskganesh]

proof is needed.

[Savonarola]

proof is needed.

[jimmy olsen]

proof is needed.

I don't see how I can win. If I like T4 I'll have bucked Rotten Tomatoes but you can say I'm parroting my hometown critic. If I don't like it you'll say I'm parroting Rotten Tomatoes.

You want me to go typing random movies in at Rotten Tomatoes and see how my perception matches up with the critics?

[Neil]

Rottentomatoes has it at 33%. Not hopeful.

Using Rottentomatoes?  I'm going to have your last name changed to Ortiz.

[Malthus]

Rottentomatoes has it at 33%. Not hopeful.

Using Rottentomatoes?  I'm going to have your last name changed to Ortiz.

Why not? Gives a good indication. May not be accurate of course.

[Barrister]

rottentomatoes is not a half-bad way to assess popular movies. 

[Ed Anger]

Rottentomatoes has it at 33%. Not hopeful.

Using Rottentomatoes?  I'm going to have your last name changed to Ortiz.

Why not? Gives a good indication. May not be accurate of course.

Only Timmays and their ilk use Rotten Tomatoes to validate their shitty movies.

[Malthus]

Only Timmays and their ilk use Rotten Tomatoes to validate their shitty movies.

But I'm not "validating" the movie - I'm pointing out that chances are it sucks.

[Neil]

Rottentomatoes has it at 33%. Not hopeful.

Using Rottentomatoes?  I'm going to have your last name changed to Ortiz.

Why not? Gives a good indication. May not be accurate of course.

Unfortunately for you, Tim tainted the site during the King Kong affair.

[Ed Anger]

Only Timmays and their ilk use Rotten Tomatoes to validate their shitty movies.

But I'm not "validating" the movie - I'm pointing out that chances are it sucks.

STOP CHANGING THE SUBJECT.

[saskganesh]

proof is needed.

I don't see how I can win. If I like T4 I'll have bucked Rotten Tomatoes but you can say I'm parroting my hometown critic. If I don't like it you'll say I'm parroting Rotten Tomatoes.

You want me to go typing random movies in at Rotten Tomatoes and see how my perception matches up with the critics?

neither. just develop your own critical capabilities and apply them.

you have like 100 posts a day. eventually, you'll show signs of original, creative thought.

[garbon]

while it might be fun to exaggerate, it's also intellectually dishonest

[Savonarola]

proof is needed.

I provided Proof and it was ignored.   

[Syt]

proof is needed.

I don't see how I can win. If I like T4 I'll have bucked Rotten Tomatoes but you can say I'm parroting my hometown critic. If I don't like it you'll say I'm parroting Rotten Tomatoes.

But ... but ... that's how internet debate works.