News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

Pope Benedict XVI 'is to resign'

Started by Martinus, February 11, 2013, 06:03:35 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Drakken

#90
Quote from: Barrister on February 11, 2013, 01:55:55 PM
Catholicism has shown that it can be endlessly flexible.  There's the theology and doctrine, of course (and by the way the evangelicals do have those as well), but there's also how it is presented.

I don't think the RCC will get more adherents by being more liberal is all I'm saying.

What you don't get, is that once you are Catholic you are always a Catholic, even if lapsed. We've learned the catechism and made most of the sacraments when we were kids. We've grown with and inside the Church.

Most still have some threads left with the Catholic Church, even when steadfast in disagreement around it. Most Catholics become lasped because they feel either kicked out of the Church, out of touch, or without understanding inside the Church because of their secularism.

Barrister

Quote from: Drakken on February 11, 2013, 01:58:29 PM
Quote from: Barrister on February 11, 2013, 01:55:55 PM
Catholicism has shown that it can be endlessly flexible.  There's the theology and doctrine, of course (and by the way the evangelicals do have those as well), but there's also how it is presented.

I don't think the RCC will get more adherents by being more liberal is all I'm saying.

What you don't get, is that once you are Catholic you are always a Catholic, even if lapsed. We've learned the catechism and  made most of the sacraments when we were kids.

Most still have some threads left with the Catholic Church, even when steadfast in disagreement around it. Most Catholics become lasped because they feel kicked out of the Church because of their secularism.

Drakken, I "get that".  I dare say my jesuit education gives me some idea how the RCC works.
Posts here are my own private opinions.  I do not speak for my employer.

Iormlund

Quote from: Drakken on February 11, 2013, 01:53:33 PM
Quote from: Iormlund on February 11, 2013, 01:48:54 PM
By the way, a lot of people call themselves Catholic. The problem for the Church is few of those truly are.

Yes, it's the attitude of "picking and choosing" what doctrine we'd like to follow, from many lapsed Catholics myself included, that turns off even the Catholic Church from even trying in the first place.

I was aiming along Zanza's "don't give a fuck" rather than "picking and choosing". In my experience the only time anyone my age visits a church is on weddings, funerals and the like. I've had a grand total of two conversations about religion with my friends. Religion is just irrelevant. Which might be why I find Atheist vs Religious flame wars so amusing. It's something nobody cares about here.

Viking

Quote from: Iormlund on February 11, 2013, 02:02:27 PM
Quote from: Drakken on February 11, 2013, 01:53:33 PM
Quote from: Iormlund on February 11, 2013, 01:48:54 PM
By the way, a lot of people call themselves Catholic. The problem for the Church is few of those truly are.

Yes, it's the attitude of "picking and choosing" what doctrine we'd like to follow, from many lapsed Catholics myself included, that turns off even the Catholic Church from even trying in the first place.

I was aiming along Zanza's "don't give a fuck" rather than "picking and choosing". In my experience the only time anyone my age visits a church is on weddings, funerals and the like. I've had a grand total of two conversations about religion with my friends. Religion is just irrelevant. Which might be why I find Atheist vs Religious flame wars so amusing. It's something nobody cares about here.

First Maxim - "There are only two amounts, too few and enough."
First Corollary - "You cannot have too many soldiers, only too few supplies."
Second Maxim - "Be willing to exchange a bad idea for a good one."
Second Corollary - "You can only be wrong or agree with me."

A terrorist which starts a slaughter quoting Locke, Burke and Mill has completely missed the point.
The fact remains that the only person or group to applaud the Norway massacre are random Islamists.

garbon

Quote from: Iormlund on February 11, 2013, 02:02:27 PM
Which might be why I find Atheist vs Religious flame wars so amusing. It's something nobody cares about here.

They are funny because they are irrelevant to you? :hmm:
"I've never been quite sure what the point of a eunuch is, if truth be told. It seems to me they're only men with the useful bits cut off."
I drank because I wanted to drown my sorrows, but now the damned things have learned to swim.

Zanza

Quote from: garbon on February 11, 2013, 02:20:48 PM
Quote from: Iormlund on February 11, 2013, 02:02:27 PM
Which might be why I find Atheist vs Religious flame wars so amusing. It's something nobody cares about here.

They are funny because they are irrelevant to you? :hmm:
I wouldn't call it amusing or funny, but it sure is interesting to see that religion causes so much controversy and emotion in debates elsewhere when your own position is and that of the society you live in mostly seems to be indifference.

Iormlund

Exactly. One of the things that got to me when I first ventured on the Interwebs was how Americans would constantly define people by their religious denomination. It was so very alien.

Valmy

Quote from: Iormlund on February 11, 2013, 02:35:44 PM
Exactly. One of the things that got to me when I first ventured on the Interwebs was how Americans would constantly define people by their religious denomination. It was so very alien.

In what sense?  Unless somebody is super religious, like old school Fahdiz, I do not really think we do this.
Quote"This is a Russian warship. I propose you lay down arms and surrender to avoid bloodshed & unnecessary victims. Otherwise, you'll be bombed."

Zmiinyi defenders: "Russian warship, go fuck yourself."

Josephus

Quote from: Drakken on February 11, 2013, 01:53:33 PM
Quote from: Iormlund on February 11, 2013, 01:48:54 PM
By the way, a lot of people call themselves Catholic. The problem for the Church is few of those truly are.

Yes, it's the attitude of "picking and choosing" what doctrine we'd like to follow, from many lapsed Catholics myself included, that turns off even the Catholic Church from even trying in the first place.

With the Catholic Church, either you believe the full dogma, or you don't. If you don't believe in miracles, or the resurrection of Christ, or Transubstantation, or that every sperm is sacred, or that salvation comes through both grace and works, or that one mortal sin left is enough to leave you suffering in Hell in the total absence from God, then you are lapsed.

As a Catholic myself, I say that makes sense. If you don't believe resurrection of Christ or whatever then pick a church that does.

Civis Romanus Sum<br /><br />"My friends, love is better than anger. Hope is better than fear. Optimism is better than despair. So let us be loving, hopeful and optimistic. And we'll change the world." Jack Layton 1950-2011

Viking

Quote from: Josephus on February 11, 2013, 02:46:16 PM
Quote from: Drakken on February 11, 2013, 01:53:33 PM
Quote from: Iormlund on February 11, 2013, 01:48:54 PM
By the way, a lot of people call themselves Catholic. The problem for the Church is few of those truly are.

Yes, it's the attitude of "picking and choosing" what doctrine we'd like to follow, from many lapsed Catholics myself included, that turns off even the Catholic Church from even trying in the first place.

With the Catholic Church, either you believe the full dogma, or you don't. If you don't believe in miracles, or the resurrection of Christ, or Transubstantation, or that every sperm is sacred, or that salvation comes through both grace and works, or that one mortal sin left is enough to leave you suffering in Hell in the total absence from God, then you are lapsed.

As a Catholic myself, I say that makes sense. If you don't believe resurrection of Christ or whatever then pick a church that does.

I gotta say that if you don't believe in the resurrection of Christ you can hardly call yourself a christian today.
First Maxim - "There are only two amounts, too few and enough."
First Corollary - "You cannot have too many soldiers, only too few supplies."
Second Maxim - "Be willing to exchange a bad idea for a good one."
Second Corollary - "You can only be wrong or agree with me."

A terrorist which starts a slaughter quoting Locke, Burke and Mill has completely missed the point.
The fact remains that the only person or group to applaud the Norway massacre are random Islamists.

Valmy

Quote from: Viking on February 11, 2013, 02:48:04 PM
I gotta say that if you don't believe in the resurrection of Christ you can hardly call yourself a christian today.

:(
Quote"This is a Russian warship. I propose you lay down arms and surrender to avoid bloodshed & unnecessary victims. Otherwise, you'll be bombed."

Zmiinyi defenders: "Russian warship, go fuck yourself."

derspiess

Quote from: Valmy on February 11, 2013, 02:44:47 PM
In what sense?  Unless somebody is super religious, like old school Fahdiz, I do not really think we do this.

Yeah, I don't really see that either.  Athiests really seem to like to stake out their positions here on Languish, but most of the ones I've known in real life haven't been quite as talkative about it.
"If you can play a guitar and harmonica at the same time, like Bob Dylan or Neil Young, you're a genius. But make that extra bit of effort and strap some cymbals to your knees, suddenly people want to get the hell away from you."  --Rich Hall

Viking

Quote from: Valmy on February 11, 2013, 02:49:37 PM
Quote from: Viking on February 11, 2013, 02:48:04 PM
I gotta say that if you don't believe in the resurrection of Christ you can hardly call yourself a christian today.

:(

That bit about him being sacrificed for our salvation and returning to life is sort of the entire point of the religion. It's actually the only bit you can't leave out.
First Maxim - "There are only two amounts, too few and enough."
First Corollary - "You cannot have too many soldiers, only too few supplies."
Second Maxim - "Be willing to exchange a bad idea for a good one."
Second Corollary - "You can only be wrong or agree with me."

A terrorist which starts a slaughter quoting Locke, Burke and Mill has completely missed the point.
The fact remains that the only person or group to applaud the Norway massacre are random Islamists.

Iormlund

Quote from: Valmy on February 11, 2013, 02:44:47 PM
Quote from: Iormlund on February 11, 2013, 02:35:44 PM
Exactly. One of the things that got to me when I first ventured on the Interwebs was how Americans would constantly define people by their religious denomination. It was so very alien.

In what sense?  Unless somebody is super religious, like old school Fahdiz, I do not really think we do this.

Yes you do (maybe not you personally). Quite a few times I see people described as Catholics, Mormons, Jews, Baptists and so on. You probably don't notice. I know don't anymore. But back then it was something that sounded strange.

To put it into perspective, I have been at this job for five years and I don't know whether anyone at the place is religious at all. It hasn't come up even once.

Martinus

Quote from: Syt on February 11, 2013, 11:36:20 AM
Quote from: Grey Fox on February 11, 2013, 11:32:09 AM
Quote from: Drakken on February 11, 2013, 11:00:23 AM
Quote from: OttoVonBismarck on February 11, 2013, 10:24:36 AM
I'm hearing talk about the Cardinal Ouellet of Quebec and previous "primate of Canada" / Archbishop of Quebec as an early frontrunner, though.

You know the saying, who enters a conclave as Pope usually gets out as Cardinal.

But who knows. "Poor Canada", as John Paul II is told to have said when he was told the third secret of Fatima. So maybe the election of Ouellet as last Pope was foretold by the prophecies  :P

Any speculation what the secret was?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Secrets_of_F%C3%A1tima#Third_secret

QuoteJ.M.J.

The third part of the secret revealed at the Cova da Iria-Fátima, on 13 May 1917.

I write in obedience to you, my God, who command me to do so through his Excellency the Bishop of Leiria and through your Most Holy Mother and mine.

After the two parts which I have already explained, at the left of Our Lady and a little above, we saw an Angel with a flaming sword in his left hand; flashing, it gave out flames that looked as though they would set the world on fire; but they died out in contact with the splendour that Our Lady radiated towards him from her right hand: pointing to the earth with his right hand, the Angel cried out in a loud voice: 'Penance, Penance, Penance!'. And we saw in an immense light that is God: 'something similar to how people appear in a mirror when they pass in front of it' a Bishop dressed in White 'we had the impression that it was the Holy Father'. Other Bishops, Priests, men and women Religious going up a steep mountain, at the top of which there was a big Cross of rough-hewn trunks as of a cork-tree with the bark; before reaching there the Holy Father passed through a big city half in ruins and half trembling with halting step, afflicted with pain and sorrow, he prayed for the souls of the corpses he met on his way; having reached the top of the mountain, on his knees at the foot of the big Cross he was killed by a group of soldiers who fired bullets and arrows at him, and in the same way there died one after another the other Bishops, Priests, men and women Religious, and various lay people of different ranks and positions. Beneath the two arms of the Cross there were two Angels each with a crystal aspersorium in his hand, in which they gathered up the blood of the Martyrs and with it sprinkled the souls that were making their way to God.

Well, that's pretty clear.