Elementary school shooting gun control pissing contest

[DGuller]

That's what professional courtesy is for.

[CountDeMoney]

Figured you'd find a way to defend it.  If funding is what's really preventing them from enforcing this law, why haven't I seen anything from Obama to specifically address it?  I'd have to think that would meet with little opposition.  Also, how would the BATF be able to enforce new gun laws if it can't deal with something relatively easy like this?

No reason to defend it;  it's a statement of fact.  I'm sure you're more than happy that NRA-sponsored Congressional legislation ensures that an agency manned by only 2,500 agents is only allowed to audit over the 132,000+ holders of federal firearms dealer licenses no more than once a year.

And besides, enforcing manufacturing and import bans on specific weaponry is a hell of a lot easier than trying to chase down individuals that provide erroneous or falsified information on forms that require background checks THAT ARE REQUIRED BY LAW TO BE DESTROYED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF SUBMISSION AS DICTATED BY THE TIARHT AMENDMENTS OF 2003, YOU COCKSUCKING NRA WHOREBEAST.

But I suspect you knew that anyway, and are looking for a troll fight.

[CountDeMoney]

I see nothing wrong with that.

They should all go back to revolvers anyway.

[Neil]

I see nothing wrong with that.

They should all go back to revolvers anyway.

Doesn't the Colt .45 1911 have a 7 round magazine clip?

[11B4V]

  Whoops!

http://abclocal.go.com/wabc/story?section=news%2Flocal%2Fnew_york&id=8958116

NEW YORK (WABC) -- A troubling oversight has been found within New York State's sweeping new gun laws.

The ban on having high-capacity magazines, as it's written, would also include law enforcement officers.

Magazines with more than seven rounds will be illegal under the new law when that part takes effect in March.

Damn Bloomberg didnt think of that.

[11B4V]

Figured you'd find a way to defend it.  If funding is what's really preventing them from enforcing this law, why haven't I seen anything from Obama to specifically address it?  I'd have to think that would meet with little opposition.  Also, how would the BATF be able to enforce new gun laws if it can't deal with something relatively easy like this?

THAT ARE REQUIRED BY LAW TO BE DESTROYED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF SUBMISSION AS DICTATED BY THE TIARHT AMENDMENTS OF 2003,

Hehe.....yea.

[CountDeMoney]

Still wouldn't stop it from the accidental discharges semi-autos can suffer from at the hands of a nitwit and blowing up the sink in the ready room.  Never liked that grip safety/trigger safety feature, either.

Revolvers are operationally safer and more idiot-proof, IMHO.

[11B4V]

Revolvers are operationally safer and more idiot-proof, IMHO.

This is true.

[derspiess]

I'm sure criminals would prefer that LEOs go back to revolvers as well

[CountDeMoney]

I'm sure criminals would prefer that LEOs go back to revolvers as well

I'm sure finance departments that have to pay out damages for accidental discharges and shootings because nitwit cops are given semi-automatic handguns designed for combat instead of a revolver that forces an officer to actually think about his actions before pulling the trigger would prefer it, too.

[CountDeMoney]

Figured you'd find a way to defend it.  If funding is what's really preventing them from enforcing this law, why haven't I seen anything from Obama to specifically address it?  I'd have to think that would meet with little opposition.  Also, how would the BATF be able to enforce new gun laws if it can't deal with something relatively easy like this?

THAT ARE REQUIRED BY LAW TO BE DESTROYED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF SUBMISSION AS DICTATED BY THE TIARHT AMENDMENTS OF 2003,

Hehe.....yea.

I hope they raid your compound and set your beer fridge in the garage on fire.

[derspiess]

I'm sure criminals would prefer that LEOs go back to revolvers as well

I'm sure finance departments that have to pay out damages for accidental discharges and shootings because nitwit cops are given semi-automatic handguns designed for combat instead of a revolver that forces an officer to actually think about his actions before pulling the trigger would prefer it, too.

Sounds like a training issue.  And chillax.

[CountDeMoney]

Eat me, derHeston.

[derspiess]

Eat me, derHeston.

Save it for Sunday, champ.

[lustindarkness]

You know, if criminals would follow the current laws, we would not need any new ones. I think we need to sit down with criminals over a beer and talk to them about that.